Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports

[Mimbres Communications]

We've had nearly zero issues with the UBNT connectors up to this point.
Preparing to hang our first two AF-5X's this month and I'm nervous. The
difference in fit between the AF-5X and every other Ubiquiti radio I have
here on the shelf is obvious.

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Ouch.  Solder...
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Mar 8, 2017 8:35 PM, "James Wilson"  wrote:
>
>> My question exactly, how do they make positive contact with the drain
>> wire...
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Kees H  wrote:
>>
>>> do they take a drain wire?
>>>
>>> *From:* Jeremy Smith
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:41 PM
>>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>>>
>>> I use the Panduit connectors.  They have a spring-loaded clip, and high
>>> quality offset gold crimps.  We stopped having issues when I switched to
>>> these.  They aren't cheap, and this is the cheapest place online to buy
>>> them that I have found.  https://www.anixter.com/en_us/
>>> products/MPS588-C/PANDUIT/Copper-Connectors/p/355197?utm_sou
>>> rce=google&utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_medium=cpc&utm_conten
>>> t=s_dc~106968659190~~&gclid=CMDcmPH8x9ICFUq5wAodHu8Fvg
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Kees H" 
>>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, March 8, 2017 2:24:12 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>>>
>>> For us the toughconnectors seem to work better than other brands
>>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2017 1:14 PM
>>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>>>
>>> The cable?  ToughCable (Ubnt) with ToughConnectors (Ubnt) going to AF5x
>>> (Ubnt).
>>>
>>> Is that what you're asking or are you talking about the AF5X unit?  I
>>> haven't opened any of them up.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Kees H  wrote:
>>>
 What brand are you using?

 *From:* Josh Luthman
 *Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2017 12:39 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports

 Well ya that's the whole issue here...


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
 Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Kees H  wrote:

> Sometimes I wonder about the quality of the connectors.
>
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2017 12:20 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Damn AF5X ports
>
> I ended up using zip ties to make the cable as solid as a rock.  By
> hand I can't make the link drop, so I'm sure these 40 mph winds won't be
> able to now.
>
> I was hoping there was a long term fix rather than "use more zip ties
> and use grease" like a better ethernet jack that doesn't have this problem
> (like what's found in WBMFG cards, Rockets, Epmp, etc).
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Shawn C. Peppers <
> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No fix but to try to rig it tightly somehow.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>> 480-287-9960 Fax
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> > On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:47 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Anyone found a solution to this?  Just climbed to find the cable
>> was slightly loose for Ethernet (power was fine).
>> >
>> > What do we need to do for an SFP???
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
> --
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>

Re: [Ubnt_users] Site Survey Tool

[Mimbres Communications]

I'm about to hang one of our IsoStation AC beta units (with a Milwaukee M18
battery) on an aluminum pole.  The built-in 2.4 GHz admin radio paired
UMobile seems almost like it was made for the job.  The lack of sidelobes
on the IsoStation is a big plus -- saw some errors using NanoBeams.  As
soon the 30° horns ship we'll swap in one of those.

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:38 PM,  wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> We're looking to create a second site survey tool for installers to check
> signal at potential customers' homes. Currently we have a drill battery
> wired to a passive POE attached to a PVC pipe with a strap for a handle.
> The POE powers an AirGateway and Powerbeam, also attached to PVC.
>
> This setup works pretty well, but in short it can be flaky sometimes, we
> have no way of monitoring battery life, and we feel there may be some
> better solutions out there. Does anyone have a recommendation for an
> inexpensive, reliable, sturdy survey tool setup? We will use AirGateway and
> Powerbeam regardless, so we're mostly looking for suggestions on the Power
> section.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shawn
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Site Survey Tool

[Mimbres Communications]

Have you had any problems with the AGWI powering the AC radios?  Saw a few
reports of those in the UBNT forum and cancelled our backorders until we
saw some resolution.


On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Aaron McKillip <
aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com> wrote:

> We use the Airgateway installer with a Cell phone battery pack charger and
> it works great. I have the AG setup as a bridge and once the radio is in
> Router mode our phone or tablet draw a address from the radio and we can
> survey the site.
>
>
>
> *Aaron McKillip |* *Hamilton Telecommunications*
>
> *O: 402-694-6655 <(402)%20694-6655> | aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com
>  | **www.hamilton.net
> *
>
> *[image:
> http://hamilton-link.ccs.local/images/social-media-icons/images_fb-icon.png]*
> * Hamilton Telecom
> *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Andy Trimmell
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 15, 2017 3:04 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Site Survey Tool
>
>
>
> We just got both of these today. http://www.balticnetworks.com/
> manufacturers/ideatronik.html
>
> I can let you know in a week how well they work.
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *sbur...@hderlink.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 15, 2017 2:38 PM
> *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] Site Survey Tool
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> We're looking to create a second site survey tool for installers to check
> signal at potential customers' homes. Currently we have a drill battery
> wired to a passive POE attached to a PVC pipe with a strap for a handle.
> The POE powers an AirGateway and Powerbeam, also attached to PVC.
>
> This setup works pretty well, but in short it can be flaky sometimes, we
> have no way of monitoring battery life, and we feel there may be some
> better solutions out there. Does anyone have a recommendation for an
> inexpensive, reliable, sturdy survey tool setup? We will use AirGateway and
> Powerbeam regardless, so we're mostly looking for suggestions on the Power
> section.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shawn
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...

[Mimbres Communications]

Perhaps here?
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-M-Beta/6-0-RC-set-CPU-speed-to-400MHz-XM-series/m-p/1733186/

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> I saw something similar to that...  somewhere.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Jesse DuPont" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Saturday, March 18, 2017 11:15:31 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...
>
> Well, I see on the UBNT downloads page there is a CPU 400 for XM... I
> swore I read in a release notes that all XM code was at CPU 400 now. My bad.
>
> *Jesse DuPont*
>
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
>
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> On 3/18/17 8:45 AM, Jesse Dupont wrote:
>
> And, starting in, I think, 6.0, all XM gear is at 400MHz CPU now anyway.
>
>
> --
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org 
>  on behalf of Mike Hammett
>  
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 18, 2017 7:35:22 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...
>
> If you're not interfering with Verizon LTE with the regular firmware,
> don't worry about it.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Dan Wyandt"  
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group"  
> *Sent: *Saturday, March 18, 2017 8:32:51 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...
>
> What is the firmware “CPU400” used on, or more appropriately, how do I
> know if I need that over the other XM board firmware?
>
>
>
> -Dan
>
>
>
> *From: *Kevin Lamothe 
> *Sent: *Friday, March 17, 2017 10:34 PM
> *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...
>
>
>
> Ubiquiti has released 1.3.4 for ToughSwitch and 6.0.1 for 802.11n gear
>
> earlier today.
>
>
>
> This bug has been fixed for a few weeks in the 8.0.1.
>
>
>
> On 3/17/2017 22:21, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/16/ubiquiti_networking_php_hole/
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ___
>
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2

[Mimbres Communications]

From
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-Updates-Blog/airOS-6-0-2-Has-Been-Released/ba-p/1880440


Version 6.0.2 (XM/XW) - Service Release (March 28, 2017)
---

New:
- New: OpenSSL update to v1.0.2k
- New: libevent update to v2.1.8
- New: libssh2 update to v1.8.0

Fixes:
- Fix: Security fixes and improvements
- Fix: Data rate module is not changed until device reboot
- Fix: In rare cases configuration is not saved
- Fix: Update x509 v3 to support new extensions used for WPA2 enterprise


On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Kees H  wrote:

> What is the difference?
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

[Mimbres Communications]

5.6.15 is out, and includes the recent airOS vulnerability fix.  There's a
CPU400 version as well..  Never saw an announcement.
https://www.ubnt.com/download/airmax-m

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Mitch  wrote:

> Anyone have the 5.6.9 (400) the verizon fix firmware?
>
> Mitch
>
> On 03/31/2017 09:13 AM, Chris Soiles wrote:
>
> I haven't upgraded any of my APs higher then 5.6.9, it seems when I do my
> clients start calling about buffering or slowness
>
> All my clients are 6.0.2, haven't done .3 yet
>
> I wish we could figure out what's up with the AP slowness
>
> Sent from iPhone 6S Plus
>
> Chris Soiles
> Owner
> Rio Cities
> csoi...@riocities.net
> 505-966-6389
>
> On Mar 30, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Rory Conaway  wrote:
>
> Started updating APs and backhauls to 6.03.
>
>
>
> Started getting calls, users dropping, NetFlix buffering, etc…  Found out
> throughput on backhauls went way down.  Checked the first backhaul which
> was Powerbeam M5 and PowerBeam 400, xm and xw firmware, it went from
> 130Mbps to 54Mbps on the backhaul even though signal levels were the same,
> -54/-55dBm.  Even worse, throughput went to 1Mbps or less.  We change it
> back to 6.0 and wham, everything goes back to normal.  Not sure what’s
> going on be we are going back to 6.0 on all APs and backhauls.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>
> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>
> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>*
>
> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>
> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*
>
>
>
> “An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist,
> half-empty; and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it
> needs to be”
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> --
> Mitch Koep
>
> A Better Wireless218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

[Mimbres Communications]

-CS firmware allows custom scripts to be installed that will survive a
reboot.  The MF worm took advantage of this 'feature' rather easily, so
standard firmware images now write their default scripts at boot time.

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:

> Can I get a verification what does the -cs allow?
>
>
>
> *Steve Barnes*
>
> Wireless Operations Manager
>
> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>
> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>
> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <(765)%20584-2288>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *James Craig via Ubnt_users
> *Sent:* Friday, March 31, 2017 12:54 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs
>
>
>
> Hi Mitch,
>
>
>
> You can find the -cs and non -cs (custom script) CPU400 versions HERE
> <https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airOS-Software-Configuration/airOS-5-6-with-Custom-Script-Support/m-p/1624488#U1624488>
> .
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Mitch  wrote:
>
> yup, Have that one
>
> Looking to get back to 5.6.9 (400) on APs down from 6.0.3
>
>
>
>
>
> On 03/31/2017 11:13 AM, Mimbres Communications wrote:
>
> 5.6.15 is out, and includes the recent airOS vulnerability fix.  There's a
> CPU400 version as well..  Never saw an announcement.
> https://www.ubnt.com/download/airmax-m
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Mitch  wrote:
>
> Anyone have the 5.6.9 (400) the verizon fix firmware?
>
> Mitch
>
>
>
> On 03/31/2017 09:13 AM, Chris Soiles wrote:
>
> I haven't upgraded any of my APs higher then 5.6.9, it seems when I do my
> clients start calling about buffering or slowness
>
>
>
> All my clients are 6.0.2, haven't done .3 yet
>
>
>
> I wish we could figure out what's up with the AP slowness
>
> Sent from iPhone 6S Plus
>
>
>
> Chris Soiles
>
> Owner
>
> Rio Cities
>
> csoi...@riocities.net
>
> 505-966-6389
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Rory Conaway  wrote:
>
> Started updating APs and backhauls to 6.03.
>
>
>
> Started getting calls, users dropping, NetFlix buffering, etc…  Found out
> throughput on backhauls went way down.  Checked the first backhaul which
> was Powerbeam M5 and PowerBeam 400, xm and xw firmware, it went from
> 130Mbps to 54Mbps on the backhaul even though signal levels were the same,
> -54/-55dBm.  Even worse, throughput went to 1Mbps or less.  We change it
> back to 6.0 and wham, everything goes back to normal.  Not sure what’s
> going on be we are going back to 6.0 on all APs and backhauls.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO*
>
> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>
> *602-426-0542 <%28602%29%20426-0542>*
>
> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>
> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*
>
>
>
> “An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist,
> half-empty; and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it
> needs to be”
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> --
>
> Mitch Koep
>
>
>
> A Better Wireless
>
> 218-851-8689 <%28218%29%20851-8689> cell
>
> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
> _______
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> --
>
> Mitch Koep
>
>
>
> A Better Wireless
>
> 218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Air Prism M5 Gen2 availability?

[Mimbres Communications]

No difference in (future) GPS capability between Gen1 and Gen2.  Some
discussion here
<https://community.ubnt.com/t5/Rocket5AC-Prism-Gen2/Swapped-Gen2-Rocket-Prism-in-Production-Impressive-Improvement/m-p/1852012>
.

On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Rory Conaway  wrote:

> Other than a 2.4GHz radio, is there any difference with the existing
> Prism.   And is there any difference, actual quantifiable documented
> specifications between the Prism or the AC-Lite other than a future GPS
> option?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Michael Clemons
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 8, 2017 5:12 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Air Prism M5 Gen2 availability?
>
>
>
> They are now. Double radius expects some this week.
>
> Sent with AquaMail for Android
> http://www.aqua-mail.com
>
> On April 7, 2017 8:19:54 PM Mike Lyon  wrote:
>
> Anyone know when it is supposed to start shipping?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mike Lyon
>
> 408-621-4826 <(408)%20621-4826>
>
> mike.l...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> _______
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

[Mimbres Communications]

Sweet.  Having a heck of a time with their website trying to get technical
data but I've emailed them for more info.

BTW, the RFIC that Ubiquiti is building for airFiber LTU is supposed to be
capable of 4096 QAM on a 100 MHz channel.  I'm thinking next-generation
AF-11 that can truly pack the pipe.


On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:56 AM, J Portman  wrote:

>
> For real data throughput and spectral efficiency, you can't beat something
> like SIAE AlfoPlus2 (4096) qam at 80MHZ) and can run XPIC so only using ONE
> frequency pair to push well over a gig with sub-millisecond latency. Sure,
> costs more, but YGWYPF.
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)

[Mimbres Communications]

Waking up a bit late here as well, and we're *seriously* rural  (second
least populated county in the sixth least populated state in the nation).
The power company and the mine both have all manner of dual-pol 40 MHz
links on 6 GHz and 11 GHz running hither and yon.  400+ mbits full duplex
to a substation?  Sure, why not?

AF-11FX at 56 MHz just meets the 101.147 efficiency requirements for an 80
MHz channel at 256 QAM.  Engineer your links at 1024 QAM and you can
probably secure the channel.  Upgrade that to 4096 QAM on the full 80 MHz
in a few years and you're golden.

The rules are probably due for a re-work at some point.  The traffic
loading requirements are ripe for a legal challenge and I suspect
somebody's likely to pull that lever in the next few years.



On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
wrote:

> "Conserve Spectrum" 
> "Waste of Resources"
> "Spectrum Efficiency".
>
> Where are you folks living ? Dream Land ? ..
>
> When are going to wake up and realize that the battle is purely about
> spectrum grab.
>
> My advice to you all newbies get the biggest chunk of 11ghz spectrum
> channels you can get and put up the radios that you can afford that will
> chew up the whole channel you can always get a better radio in the
> future (or when you can afford it).. but very surely you may not be so
> lucky in finding extra spectrum when you need it in the future
>
> Doing anything less, is very likely to endanger your future business well
> being.
>
> Can me whatever you like
> But take it from someone who is waking up to this rather late i.e.
> virtually impossible to find 6ghz paths, virtually impossible to find 11ghz
> paths, and 18ghz are going fast too... BTW, we are in Rain Zone N which
> means only 11ghz & 6ghz are practical for any reasonable distance...
>
> (BTW in our area, no 3.65, no CBRS, sprint is sitting on 2.5ahhh
> !...but we can use 24Ghz & 60Ghz & EBand ! )
>
>
> . you think your industry peers are going to play nice with conserving
> spectrum ' !!! Think again...
> e.g.   http://about.att.com/story/att_to_acquire_straight_path.html
> Follow the bigger story starting with the FCC & Straight Path ...
>
>
-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

[Mimbres Communications]

I'll say it again: The traffic loading requirements leave the squatters
open to a legal challenge.

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

> Wow, you are dead on Faisal.  Govnet is filing for everything they can
> find in Arizona now with absolutely no customers and no chance of getting
> customers.  Even if customers were there, they don't have a sales division,
> don't answer the phone, and don't respond to email.  This is what happens
> when bureaucratic morons give away $90M with no oversight and screw up real
> companies.
>
> Rory
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:36 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)
>
> "Conserve Spectrum" 
> "Waste of Resources"
> "Spectrum Efficiency".
>
> Where are you folks living ? Dream Land ? ..
>
> When are going to wake up and realize that the battle is purely about
> spectrum grab.
>
> My advice to you all newbies get the biggest chunk of 11ghz spectrum
> channels you can get and put up the radios that you can afford that will
> chew up the whole channel you can always get a better radio in the
> future (or when you can afford it).. but very surely you may not be so
> lucky in finding extra spectrum when you need it in the future
>
> Doing anything less, is very likely to endanger your future business well
> being.
>
> Can me whatever you like
> But take it from someone who is waking up to this rather late i.e.
> virtually impossible to find 6ghz paths, virtually impossible to find 11ghz
> paths, and 18ghz are going fast too... BTW, we are in Rain Zone N which
> means only 11ghz & 6ghz are practical for any reasonable distance...
>
> (BTW in our area, no 3.65, no CBRS, sprint is sitting on 2.5ahhh
> !...but we can use 24Ghz & 60Ghz & EBand ! )
>
>
> . you think your industry peers are going to play nice with conserving
> spectrum ' !!! Think again...
> e.g.   http://about.att.com/story/att_to_acquire_straight_path.html
> Follow the bigger story starting with the FCC & Straight Path ...
>
> --...
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

[Mimbres Communications]

By old school microwave standards, most modern links are running at 100%,
thanks to the continuously transmitted pseudorandom carriers.  I suspect
that defense has managed to refute some accusations of underutilized
links.  Nowadays, you'd need archived traffic data to prove anything (which
would be trivial to fake, if you happened to be faced with an unethical
turdbag).

On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

> I’m going to have our attorney check that out.  Thanks for the heads up.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Mimbres Communications
> *Sent:* Friday, April 14, 2017 9:40 PM
>
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)
>
>
>
> I'll say it again: The traffic loading requirements leave the squatters
> open to a legal challenge.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Rory Conaway 
> wrote:
>
> Wow, you are dead on Faisal.  Govnet is filing for everything they can
> find in Arizona now with absolutely no customers and no chance of getting
> customers.  Even if customers were there, they don't have a sales division,
> don't answer the phone, and don't respond to email.  This is what happens
> when bureaucratic morons give away $90M with no oversight and screw up real
> companies.
>
> Rory
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:36 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)
>
> "Conserve Spectrum" 
> "Waste of Resources"
> "Spectrum Efficiency".
>
> Where are you folks living ? Dream Land ? ..
>
> When are going to wake up and realize that the battle is purely about
> spectrum grab.
>
> My advice to you all newbies get the biggest chunk of 11ghz spectrum
> channels you can get and put up the radios that you can afford that will
> chew up the whole channel you can always get a better radio in the
> future (or when you can afford it).. but very surely you may not be so
> lucky in finding extra spectrum when you need it in the future
>
> Doing anything less, is very likely to endanger your future business well
> being.
>
> Can me whatever you like
> But take it from someone who is waking up to this rather late i.e.
> virtually impossible to find 6ghz paths, virtually impossible to find 11ghz
> paths, and 18ghz are going fast too... BTW, we are in Rain Zone N which
> means only 11ghz & 6ghz are practical for any reasonable distance...
>
> (BTW in our area, no 3.65, no CBRS, sprint is sitting on 2.5ahhh
> !...but we can use 24Ghz & 60Ghz & EBand ! )
>
>
> . you think your industry peers are going to play nice with conserving
> spectrum ' !!! Think again...
> e.g.   http://about.att.com/story/att_to_acquire_straight_path.html
> Follow the bigger story starting with the FCC & Straight Path ...
>
> --...
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> _______
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] WISPA Mailing list issues (was: Firmware V6.0)

[Mimbres Communications]

WISPA had some kind of mailing list database cockup a couple weeks back.  I
started getting emails from two state lists that are nowhere near here so I
called the office. Turns out I was on six extra states plus a couple of
other random lists that I'd never even heard of.

If what you see in your account online doesn't match what you're getting,
call or email Arielle and she'll fix it.



On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Ben Buie - Gosuto  wrote:

> Not a big deal (I actually like these discussions), but I randomly got
> added to this discussion list today (I have never seen these emails until
> today). I'm wondering if the same thing happened to Blake or others?
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] rf elements model number for use with Rocket M5

[Mimbres Communications]

There's no like-for-like replacement of a conventional 120° sector.  The
number and type of horns needed for optimal coverage would depend on the
client count and distribution (which clients lie in which portions of the
coverage area).

The new UBNT 60° horns (which work with the PrismStation AC and the
IsoStation M/AC) have a 30° vertical beamwidth and could potentially
actually be a better fit there, at least for some portion of the coverage
area (again depending on the geographic distribution).

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Ken Patrick  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We have traditionally worked just deployed Rocket M5 with the standard
> ubnt 120 degrees sector and want to replace with RF elements horns.
> PLease can anyone help with the model number for the RF elements horns and
> any adapters I would need to use them with a Rocket M5
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Air fiber 24 real world experiences feedback please

[Mimbres Communications]

AF-11FX w/ UBNT two foot dishes (should hit 10X on that link, which would
give you 500 mbits on a single 40 MHz channel) would run ~$4,300 with
coordination and licensing fees.  Given the reduced risk of rain fade and
the protection of a licensed link, that looks like a pretty good deal to me.

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Kurt Fankhauser 
wrote:

> the AF24 will work as long as you can live with a few minutes of downtime
> during storms, personally I would put it, much cheaper than licensed!!!
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:32 AM, can...@believewireless.net <
> p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
>
>> Too far for an AF24. Licensed is the only way to go. Look at an AF11X.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Eric Williams SDWISP 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello my flow Ubiquitiens.  I’m looking at installing an Air fiber 24
>>> {non HD} on an 8 mile link in south west California with a good line of
>>> sight. I’m looking for some feedback on real world experiences. I’m limited
>>> in space on the AP side so I’m looking at the non HD as it is smaller and
>>> cheaper than HD. Shooting for 500 Megs of true internet traffics download
>>> and 100 Megs up. Air link is showing signal of -68, 4X 16 QUM at 500 plus
>>> Megs
>>>
>>> I’m on the Daily digest list. Thanks for the feedback
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eric Williams W7EMW
>>>
>>> Network Administrator
>>>
>>> 619-698-3904 <(619)%20698-3904> Office
>>>
>>> 619-922-6001 <(619)%20922-6001> Support Hot Line
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 9740 Campo Road #211
>>>
>>> Spring Valley Ca 91977
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> WWW.SDWISP.COM
>>>
>>> SDWISP Begins Where Fiber Ends
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] new owner turning off power

[Mimbres Communications]

SolarBeam is priced right.  Three panels and an external SLA might get the
job done there.

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/SolarBeam/bd-p/SolarBeam-Beta


On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Jan-OOLLC 
wrote:

> Solar!!!  It's expensive and confusing and the few places I've talked to
> in the past about buying one seem to want to engineer the project to death
> where adding 1 more nano-amp would break their package.  There has got to
> be other WISPs with solutions.
>
> If only I can find a modular package ready for use.  Basic typical tower
> needs for us: 2 nanobeamM5-400, 1 switch RB260GSP, 1 Rocket M2 w/sector,
> some will use an ePMP.  Tower may need more gear later, so I would need
> more power in that event, hence a solar panel easy to add to.  Remote
> monitor the batteries, charger/controller that has an rj45 interface and
> not some damn thing in the cloud with an account.
>
> Can somebody out there throw some parts and suppliers at me?
>
> I would need a panel that performs well in overcast-conditions.  Sunny
> days are sort of rare around here, comes mostly in liquid form.  Sun for a
> day, clouds for 3-4, except last winter we had 148 days of rain (every day
> with very little of sun playing peek-a-boo).  High overcast much of the
> time.  It's almost rain-forest conditions here.
>
> Jan V
>
> On 06/06/2017 08:32 AM, can...@believewireless.net wrote:
>
> Solar an option?
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Josh Luthman  > wrote:
>
>> Can you just get your own meter installed?  Power should be like $10-20 a
>> month for a handful of devices.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Jan-OOLLC 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Relocating tower, yes obvious solution, is there a legal way to prevent
>>> power from being turned off in the meantime?  (FYI--a foreclosure that
>>> went backwards and had been one of the first tower locations in the area
>>> more than 10 years, so we believed the customer)
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Jan V
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF24 and -48VDC input?

[Mimbres Communications]

More info, yummy!

Thank you.


On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Salvador Bertenbreiter via Ubnt_users <
ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> Just updated the KB article to include more information about power input
> options for airFiber radios:
> https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/215999457?flash_digest=
> 39fe6fbf92d2e372f6764eb4ac73ac471636e8d5
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:42 PM Kristian Hoffmann 
> wrote:
>
>> Perfect.  Thanks Alex.
>>
>>
>> -Kristian
>>
>>
>> On 06/28/2017 05:19 PM, Alex Pavlos via Ubnt_users wrote:
>>
>> The AF-24 and AF-24HD *WILL* support -48VDC since its supply is
>> isolated.  AF-5(*not X* the large full duplex radio) also will support
>> -48VDC.
>>
>> *AF-5X, AF-4X, AF-3X, AF-2X and AF-11FX WILL NOT ACCEPT -48VDC (positive
>> on Earth/chassis/tower ground) AT ALL!  If an “X” radio has been powered by
>> -48VDC with respect to case (tower ground) it will surely be damaged!*
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 6:30 PM, Kristian Hoffmann 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Can someone from Ubnt answer this question?  I'm getting yes, no, and
>> maybe in even numbers.  To complicate matters, I did actually power one up
>> with -48V and it didn't explode.  And that wasn't on a bench, isolated from
>> ground.  That's on a metal tower with other -48V non-isolated radios.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Kristian
>>
>> On 06/27/2017 11:47 AM, Kristian Hoffmann wrote:
>>
>> I'm reading that as "yes, you can power it with -48VDC."
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Kristian
>>
>> On 06/27/2017 11:00 AM, jul...@netonix.com wrote:
>>
>> Input 48v is transformer isolated, individual on-board voltage converters
>> have DC negative directly coupled to chassis ground.
>>
>> AF24 reads 0 ohms from board DC- (also digital ground) to chassis
>> plate, “no” path between input DC- and chassis plate.
>>
>> 24HD shares the same PCB, so the same applies for that.
>>
>> *From:* Kristian Hoffmann 
>> *Sent:* ‎Tuesday‎, ‎June‎ ‎27‎, ‎2017 ‎1‎:‎52‎ ‎PM
>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is the AF24's internal power supply isolated in such a way that it can
>> be powered with -48VDC, like other telco equipment with a positive
>> ground, or will this cause a short when mixed with other -48VDC
>> equipment on the same ground plane?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Kristian Hoffmann
>> Fire2Wire
>> kh...@fire2wire.com
>> http://www.fire2wire.com
>>
>> Office - 209-543-1800 <(209)%20543-1800> | Fax - 209-545-1469
>> <(209)%20545-1469> | Toll Free - 800-905-FIRE
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT 6.0.6 WARNING

[Mimbres Communications]

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-M-Beta/Limit-on-downgrades-from-6-0-6Beta/m-p/1945657#M26903
seems to indicate you should be able to downgrade to an earlier 6.0 FW
version, then again from there if needed.

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 3:58 AM,  wrote:

> Everyone
>
> Heads up if you upgrade to 6.0.6 it will NOT allow
>
> you to down grade firmware and seems to break
>
> the LAN side of the radio.
>
> Allows POE but no data and no LAN Graph
>
> Have opened a support ticket but so far not much help
>
> Looks like truck rolls to change radios so be careful
>
> Mitch Koep
>
> 218-851-8689 cell
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT 6.0.6 WARNING

[Mimbres Communications]

I think I may have found the source of some potential confusion here:

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-M-Beta/6-0-6-on-official-download-is-it-beta-or-release-REAL-JUNK/m-p/1985788
claims that 6.0.6-BETA

 *does* allow downgrades -- and can itself be uploaded to radios running
6.0.6 GA .
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

[Mimbres Communications]

Routers only have to comply with Part 15 Subpart B (Unintentional
Radiators).




On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> Of course I also saw a ruling saying router vendors couldn't block open
> source firmware like DD-WRT, so I'm not sure how the conflict resolves.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Mike Hammett" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:58:33 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick
>
> I do remember seeing something about this in the last round of 5 GHz
> concerns.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Rory Conaway" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:39:38 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick
>
> Can you clarify what regulatory requirement states that you have to
> prevent other software from running on your hardware?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *UBNT SNK
> *Sent:* Monday, July 10, 2017 5:55 PM
> *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick
>
>
>
> Let me be very clear - this has nothing to do with preventing you from
> putting specific software (Cambium or otherwise) on your device, nor is it
> driven by lawyers in any way. Radios are also not bricked, nor are they
> sabotaged at all. No one is forced to upgrade and there is no modification
> of the user agreement here.
>
> It is a regulatory requirement to prevent software which is not ours
> running on our devices, and also improves airMAX system security. These
> same protections are implemented on other products and by other vendors.
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert 
> *Date:* July 10, 2017 at 12:51:13 PM PDT
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* *Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick*
> *Reply-To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
>
> When you can't compete technically, you compete legally...   Shortly
> thereafter you wonder why your foot has a hole in it...
>
> On 07/10/2017 12:45 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
>
> It seems that this upgrade isn't an upgrade at all.  It's driven by
>
> lawyers requiring that you do an electronic signature that you agree to
>
> not use Cambium Elevate software on this device. Pretty odd since it's
>
> my radio, well past warranty so I can do what I want to it.  Is this the
>
> direction UBNT is going, turn your radio into a brick if you don't
>
> modify your use agreement with them?  Well Robert DID come from Apple so
>
> I guess I shouldn't be surprised about sabotaging product to force you
>
> into newer gear, guess 6.04 is the last update I'll do for my radios,
>
> sad. #patheticdirection
>
>
>
> Forbes Mercy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

[Mimbres Communications]

Right, of course.  I was thinking of Ethernet routers.

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> I'm not sure that's accurate for a wireless router, which is intending to
> transmit. Consumer routers are almost exclusively wireless routers.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Mimbres Communications" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:12:34 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick
>
> Routers only have to comply with Part 15 Subpart B (Unintentional
> Radiators).
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
>> Of course I also saw a ruling saying router vendors couldn't block open
>> source firmware like DD-WRT, so I'm not sure how the conflict resolves.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> --
>> *From: *"Mike Hammett" 
>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:58:33 PM
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick
>>
>> I do remember seeing something about this in the last round of 5 GHz
>> concerns.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> --
>> *From: *"Rory Conaway" 
>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:39:38 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick
>>
>> Can you clarify what regulatory requirement states that you have to
>> prevent other software from running on your hardware?
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> *On Behalf Of *UBNT SNK
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 10, 2017 5:55 PM
>> *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick
>>
>>
>>
>> Let me be very clear - this has nothing to do with preventing you from
>> putting specific software (Cambium or otherwise) on your device, nor is it
>> driven by lawyers in any way. Radios are also not bricked, nor are they
>> sabotaged at all. No one is forced to upgrade and there is no modification
>> of the user agreement here.
>>
>> It is a regulatory requirement to prevent software which is not ours
>> running on our devices, a

Re: [Ubnt_users] why limit the mcs rate ?

[Mimbres Communications]

Wow, that's truly ugly.


It would help if we had some knobs for the rate algorithm.  If we could set
thresholds and times required (separately, to move up and down) I think we
could craft a sane auto mode that worked with local conditions.



On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Randy Cosby  wrote:

> We recently came across a similar situation. The previous ISP was using
> low modulation rates as a way to limit the customer bandwidth because they
> lacked any other mechanism for doing so. So a customer with a 10M commit
> rate plan was being set to MCS1. 20M got MCS3, etc.
>
>
>
> So wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *CBB - Jay Fuller
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 13, 2017 8:17 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] why limit the mcs rate ?
>
>
>
>
>
> ok, i'd buy this.  but i'd say 80% of the clients were "fixed" to the
> lowest modulation.
>
> there are a few i could understand this being done for.
>
> thanks Jonathan - I did not think of that.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> *From:* Jonathan Taylor 
>
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 13, 2017 9:11 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] why limit the mcs rate ?
>
>
>
> I would do this on fringe clients with low signal so it would stabilize
> the modulation.  When the modulation jumps around the throughput was worse.
>
>
> *Jonathan Taylor*
>
> *WiSouth Networks, LLC*
>
> jtay...@wisouth.net
>
> *(334) 595-9521 <(334)%20595-9521>*
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:06 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <
> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> We have a 2.4 network we recently acquired - in going through some of the
> radios - we find several of them have
>
> Max TX Rate locked in at MCS 1 - auto is unchecked.
>
>
>
> I've never seen a configuration like this nor have I ever heard of it
> being done.
>
>
>
> Why would someone do this?  What possible benefit could this have been?
>
>
>
> I think it is related to interference mitigation but several of the
> clients I have undone this setting on are already modulating
>
> much better (obviously)
>
>
>
> thoughts?
>
>
>
> Thanks :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC Prism PtMP and nanobeams

[Mimbres Communications]

Are these Gen1 NBE's?

The Gen2 NBE-19's are supposed to have significant pattern improvements.

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Chris J. Ruschmann 
wrote:

> We see very odd issues with Nano beams in general. A lot of chain
> mismatch's. lower signals compared to lesser nanostations M5's and AC's.
> Just overall not a very good product and we are getting grid of them and
> replacing with light beams.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:18 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC Prism PtMP and nanobeams
>
> Nothing we have seen either.  With that firmware combination, things seem
> solid.   However, we haven't done any hard testing back to an speedtest
> source though, only the internal tests.
>
> Rory
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 9:15 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC Prism PtMP and nanobeams
>
> We have not noticed any issues like this.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> > On Jul 13, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Scott Lambert 
> wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone aware of known issues with R5AC Prisms, first gen, talking to
> nanobeams in a PtMP setup? We replaced 11 R5Ms with R5AC Prisms.
> >
> > 8.3 and 6.0.4
> >
> > Some of the nanobeam users are now complaining of poor upload speeds.
> > --
> > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] 24V PoE powering EP-R6

[Mimbres Communications]

The EP-R6 can utilize 4-pair PoE input (like that provided by the included
brick).



On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:

> Caution Hijacking thread. 😊
>
> I need to power the Edgepoint 6 with a 24 VDC POE.  Is there such a beast
> to do it.  I have a Texas WiFi injector but pins 1236 are reversed pol from
> what UBNT supplies..
>
>
>
> Steve Barnes
>
> Wireless Ops Manager
>
> New Lisbon Broadband and Comunications
>
> NLBC.com
>
>
>
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] solar powered towers

[Mimbres Communications]

The MPPT version is more like $600 -- and only the 60A includes onboard
Ethernet.

Their smaller MPPT controllers can be paired with a MeterBus to Ethernet
converter (EMC-1)

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:13 AM,  wrote:

>
> https://www.solar-electric.com/tr60amp12244.html?gclid=
> EAIaIQobChMIlISgm-ez1QIVC2p-Ch0ZNwITEAQYASABEgLmRPD_BwE
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 08:09, James Wilson  wrote:
>
> We use Morningstar for this...
>
> On Jul 31, 2017 11:05 AM, "Jan-OOLLC"  wrote:
>
>> looking for a source to acquire mppt charge controller w/IP addressable
>> LAN port for panel/battery monitoring
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jan V
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] solar powered towers

[Mimbres Communications]

The EMC-1
<https://www.morningstarcorp.com/products/ethernet-meterbus-converter/> does
support 100baseTX.

There are quite a few third party ModBus to Ethernet converters out there.
Not sure how that would work, but might be a possibility.

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:56 AM,  wrote:

> Doh! My bad! I posted the wrong one! I have their mppt-60 one.
>
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 09:41, Mimbres Communications 
> wrote:
>
> The MPPT version is more like $600 -- and only the 60A includes onboard
> Ethernet.
>
> Their smaller MPPT controllers can be paired with a MeterBus to Ethernet
> converter (EMC-1)
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:13 AM,  wrote:
>
>>
>> https://www.solar-electric.com/tr60amp12244.html?gclid=EAIaI
>> QobChMIlISgm-ez1QIVC2p-Ch0ZNwITEAQYASABEgLmRPD_BwE
>>
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 08:09, James Wilson  wrote:
>>
>> We use Morningstar for this...
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2017 11:05 AM, "Jan-OOLLC"  wrote:
>>
>>> looking for a source to acquire mppt charge controller w/IP addressable
>>> LAN port for panel/battery monitoring
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Jan V
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
> ___________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS Sync in AC Gen 2

[Mimbres Communications]

GPS sync works quite well -- even on Gen1 Prisms.

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 4:55 PM, RickG  wrote:

> Any news? Has Ubiquiti finally been able to get GPS to work with Gen2 or
> should I give up and switch to Cambium?
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Mitch  wrote:
>
>> Planning on testing this next week
>>
>> I Hope
>>
>> Mitch
>>
>> On 7/18/2017 10:44 AM, alex phillips wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone had any experience running GPS sync yet in UBNT  Gen2 AC
>> products?
>>
>> please share if you have information.
>>
>> thanks
>> *Alex Phillips*
>> CEO and General Manager
>> RBNS.net
>> HighSpeedLink.net
>> *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2017)*
>> *WISPA President (2015-2017)*
>> *540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -RickG
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS Sync in AC Gen 2

[Mimbres Communications]

Call Arielle at the office tomorrow and she'll make sure it gets done.

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:01 PM, p...@pliinc.com 
wrote:

> Stop this spam shitI have told this list manager to stop sending to
> this email. ...stop!
> On Aug 6, 2017 8:57 PM, "RickG"  wrote:
>
>> http://www.wispa.org/Resources/Email-Lists
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:56 PM, p...@pliinc.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Remove from list
>>> On Jul 18, 2017 11:44 AM, "alex phillips" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has anyone had any experience running GPS sync yet in UBNT  Gen2 AC
>>>> products?
>>>>
>>>> please share if you have information.
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> *Alex Phillips*
>>>> CEO and General Manager
>>>> RBNS.net
>>>> HighSpeedLink.net
>>>> *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2017)*
>>>> *WISPA President (2015-2017)*
>>>> *540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -RickG
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti out of step password rules

[Mimbres Communications]

They got a huge amount of pushback on that and will be making changes
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-AC/8-3-admin-password-requirements/m-p/1991884#M23145

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Roy  wrote:

> I recently updated software on one of my units and found the Ubiquiti
> changed the password rules.  They now require Upper/lower case letters,
> numbers, and the wonderful special characters.
>
> The NIST has finally admitted their mistake in recommending those
> password rules
>
> "The Man Who Wrote Those Password Rules Has a New Tip: N3v$r M1^d!"
>
> https://www.wsj.com/article_email/the-man-who-wrote-those-
> password-rules-has-a-new-tip-n3v-r-m1-d-1502124118-
> lMyQjAxMTA3ODA5ODIwMDg3Wj/
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] WISPA listserv issues again

[Mimbres Communications]

I spoke with Trina last night.  WISPA is aware of the problem and is
currently flogging their software provider.



On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Trey Scarborough  wrote:

> It is interesting though I have not subscribed to this list yet I some
> how became a member as well. I subscribe to the members, but not this
> one. I will attempt to remove myself not no @holes needed other than the
> one I am sitting on ;)
>
>
> On 8/7/2017 11:08 AM, alex phillips wrote:
> > Trina has talked with the fella and its all taken care of.
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Prisim capacity

[Mimbres Communications]

Currently limited in software to 85 stations for all airMAX AC APs.  We are
told there is a possibility of raising that (on the Prism only) in the
future.

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Forbes Mercy 
wrote:

> I know the Titaniums were 35-50 capacity (we don't go over 40 on them)
> but what about the Prisim2's?  How many can we put on those of average
> 10mbps customers?  Just wondering if their processor is stronger and can
> handle more in AP mode?
>
> Thanks,
> Forbes
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] pbe-m5-400 what's with the different power levels?

[Mimbres Communications]

I've got three first generation M5-400's (with the GigE ports) NIB if
anyone is interested.

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Different certification.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Aug 17, 2017 8:22 PM, "Jan Van Kort" 
> wrote:
>
>> I've got 2 of these, they look the same, have the same firmware, were
>> meant to connect across 3 miles and are useless.  The power out of one
>> gets 25db and the max out of the other seems to be 17db and none of the
>> channels I'd like to use have any useful power at all.
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
> _______
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400

[Mimbres Communications]

Shaping works best on egress interfaces.  Tower router controls download
speeds, upload speeds are shaped on the WAN port of the CPE radio.

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net 
wrote:

> Steve,
>
> Thats a good idea to test.  Never set one up on the CPE.   I see the area
> on the network tab, but not 100% how to set up and down limits on it.  Is
> there a protocol to use so the settings function correctly?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Troy
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>  Original message 
> From: Steve Barnes 
> Date: 8/21/17 10:40 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400
>
> Try taking the queue off the Mtik and settIng it on the cpe
>
> Steve Barnes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of t...@byhalia.net
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 2:33 PM
> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400
>
> Time to ask the experts as I cannot figure out this issue!!  This CPE
> worked perfect until a recent storm, but I have replaced the AP and CPE
> radios at this point too.
>
> I have one customer that reports erratic download and uploads.  Actually
> sometimes going above the set rate in my Tik router, CCR1009-7G-1C+PC,
> Firmware Bugfix 6.38.7.  This CPE is connected to an AP that is feed from
> routers that are directly connected to my fiber line in my Data Center in
> this area, so everything is at the base of the tower that feeds this AP
> directly, no jumps to other towers first.
>
> I spent a lot of time connected to this CPE at the customers house testing
> with and without airmax, changing radio firmware, decreasing and increasing
> power, but get the same erratic behavior.  I changed the POE,
> M5 cone tested the cable (tested good), but still the same.  I finally
> tested multiple channels at the AP and found a stable solution/temp fix,
> not perfect, but stable.  I had to leave the CPE unlimited as it was still
> not behaving correctly so for the trouble I left it unlimited to buy time
> to figure this out.  I even stopped at some other customers on that same
> road and AP and those tested like it should at the rate it was set to in
> the Tik router.
>
> Customer has been great during this time and sending me samples of
> speedtests at different times in the day.  Still getting big swings in
> speeds that vary and when I check AirControl it does not even match the
> speeds they are reporting.  I'm using AC 2.1 beta 7.  I realize the
> unlimited setup could impact their tests, but why is AC2 not showing
> anything even close to their speedtests?
>
> Below are the radio stats for this CPE.  I attached a word file of the M5
> radio stats as the copied image would not paste correctly on this email.
>
> Signal:  -56dBm
> H/V:  -59/-58 dBm
>
> Transmit CCQ:  93%
> TX/RX:  72.222mbps/72.222mbps
> Firmware 5.6.15 XW
>
> Airmax is enabled and shows 96% for both.
>
> Channel Width:  10mhz
> Channel Freq:  5805
> Distance is 1.7 miles
> TX power 26
>
> Access Point is on 5.6.15 XW firmware
>
> Thank you for your support!!
>
> Troy Gibson
>
> Byhalia.net, LLC
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400

[Mimbres Communications]

It's far easier for a network device to limit its output than its input.
When inputs are throttled, the upstream device may or may not listen to the
requests (if such requests are even possible -- streaming UDP protocols
come to mind).

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Steve Barnes  wrote:

> Sam Why only Egress?  We use Egress and Ingress both and have no issue.
>
>
>
> *Steve Barnes*
>
> Wireless Operations Manager
>
> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>
> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>
> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <(765)%20584-2288>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Sam Tetherow
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:37 AM
> *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400
>
>
>
> Use egress only.  LAN egress is download, WLAN egress is upload.
>
>
>
> On 08/22/2017 08:59 AM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
>
>
> Thats a good idea to test.  Never set one up on the CPE.   I see the area
> on the network tab, but not 100% how to set up and down limits on it.  Is
> there a protocol to use so the settings function correctly?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Troy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>
>
>  Original message 
>
> From: Steve Barnes  
>
> Date: 8/21/17 10:40 PM (GMT-05:00)
>
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group  
>
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400
>
>
>
> Try taking the queue off the Mtik and settIng it on the cpe
>
> Steve Barnes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> ] On Behalf Of t...@byhalia.net
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 2:33 PM
> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Erratic downloads and uploads, PBE-M5-400
>
> Time to ask the experts as I cannot figure out this issue!!  This CPE
> worked perfect until a recent storm, but I have replaced the AP and CPE
> radios at this point too.
>
> I have one customer that reports erratic download and uploads.  Actually
> sometimes going above the set rate in my Tik router, CCR1009-7G-1C+PC,
> Firmware Bugfix 6.38.7.  This CPE is connected to an AP that is feed from
> routers that are directly connected to my fiber line in my Data Center in
> this area, so everything is at the base of the tower that feeds this AP
> directly, no jumps to other towers first.
>
> I spent a lot of time connected to this CPE at the customers house testing
> with and without airmax, changing radio firmware, decreasing and increasing
> power, but get the same erratic behavior.  I changed the POE,
> M5 cone tested the cable (tested good), but still the same.  I finally
> tested multiple channels at the AP and found a stable solution/temp fix,
> not perfect, but stable.  I had to leave the CPE unlimited as it was still
> not behaving correctly so for the trouble I left it unlimited to buy time
> to figure this out.  I even stopped at some other customers on that same
> road and AP and those tested like it should at the rate it was set to in
> the Tik router.
>
> Customer has been great during this time and sending me samples of
> speedtests at different times in the day.  Still getting big swings in
> speeds that vary and when I check AirControl it does not even match the
> speeds they are reporting.  I'm using AC 2.1 beta 7.  I realize the
> unlimited setup could impact their tests, but why is AC2 not showing
> anything even close to their speedtests?
>
> Below are the radio stats for this CPE.  I attached a word file of the M5
> radio stats as the copied image would not paste correctly on this email.
>
> Signal:  -56dBm
> H/V:  -59/-58 dBm
>
> Transmit CCQ:  93%
> TX/RX:  72.222mbps/72.222mbps
> Firmware 5.6.15 XW
>
> Airmax is enabled and shows 96% for both.
>
> Channel Width:  10mhz
> Channel Freq:  5805
> Distance is 1.7 miles
> TX power 26
>
> Access Point is on 5.6.15 XW firmware
>
> Thank you for your support!!
>
> Troy Gibson
>
> Byhalia.net, LLC
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Nanostation replacement

[Mimbres Communications]

Not yet, but they're working on it.

The NanoSwitch ($39 PoE powered, has three ports with PoE out) should be in
the channel soon.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Roy  wrote:

> Hi
>
> The Nanostation M5 has the feature of two ethernet ports and POE passthru.
>
> Are there any replacements?
>
> Roy
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Nanostation replacement

[Mimbres Communications]

I have been told there is a radio in the works with two Ethernet ports and
PoE passthrough, I believe it will have a NanoStation-like form factor.  I
used 'like' because the new Locos have rounded corners and are thinner than
the old ones.  Quite attractive, actually


On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Roy  wrote:

>
> Would have liked it in a radio but the Nanoswitch will do.
> Unfortunately, I need one in the next few weeks so am stuck with a
> Nanobridge solution for now
>
> On 10/24/2017 10:30 AM, Mimbres Communications wrote:
>
> Not yet, but they're working on it.
>
> The NanoSwitch ($39 PoE powered, has three ports with PoE out) should be
> in the channel soon.
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Roy  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> The Nanostation M5 has the feature of two ethernet ports and POE passthru.
>>
>> Are there any replacements?
>>
>> Roy
>> ___
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 18Ghz Airfiber?

[Mimbres Communications]

>From what I hear, the AF-11FX business case is still being evaluated there.

They have a lot on their plate (and a mountain of money tied up) with LTU.

I'd be surprised to see another licensed product (other than perhaps a 10
GHz variant for EU) in the short term.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Jon Langeler 
wrote:

> Are these in the future?
>
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Nanostation replacement

[Mimbres Communications]

To wit
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-AC/What-s-the-AC-solution-for-my-micro-micro-pops/m-p/2113312#M26131

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Mimbres Communications 
wrote:

> Not yet, but they're working on it.
>
> The NanoSwitch ($39 PoE powered, has three ports with PoE out) should be
> in the channel soon.
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Roy  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> The Nanostation M5 has the feature of two ethernet ports and POE passthru.
>>
>> Are there any replacements?
>>
>> Roy
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Power Station 5

[Mimbres Communications]

Quite a few.  What's the link distance and use case?

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Roger Clifton 
wrote:

> Greeting
>
>
>
> Does anyone have a solution to upgrade the Power Station 5 .
>
>
>
> Roger Clifton
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Power Station 5

[Mimbres Communications]

I assume you have clear line of sight there, in which case there are
several potential 5 GHz options.  If the spectrum is crowded there, I'd
start with a pair of IsoStaion 5AC's -- if not, I'd probably use either
NanoBeam 5AC-16's or NS-5AC Locos (once those show up in the channel).

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Roger Clifton 
wrote:

> Would like to connect to home office which is about ½ mile from me
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Mimbres Communications
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2017 2:57 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Power Station 5
>
>
>
> Quite a few.  What's the link distance and use case?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Roger Clifton 
> wrote:
>
> Greeting
>
>
>
> Does anyone have a solution to upgrade the Power Station 5 .
>
>
>
> Roger Clifton
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
>
> _______
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] R2AC

[Mimbres Communications]

2XC.v8.4.3-beta on the AP and 6.1.3-beta on the stations.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> I would assume if 8.x firmware was on the AC and 6.x was on the Ms, you'd
> be okay.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Mike Lyon" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Monday, October 30, 2017 5:18:27 PM
> *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] R2AC
>
>
> Anyone know if if the R2AC is backwards compatible with standard Rocket
> M2s and powerbeams and such?
>
> Thank You,
> Mike
>
>
> --
> Mike Lyon
> mike.l...@gmail.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Radios won't operate on the same channel

[Mimbres Communications]

Do you have an unlock code for the NBM5?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Roy  wrote:

>
> I have a Nanobridge running 6.1.3 trying to connect to a Nanostation
> also running 6.1.3
>
> The Nanostation is the AP and set for 5630 Mhz.  The Nanobridge won't
> connect since it doesn't seem to allow operation on that channel?
>
> A check of allowed channels has the Nanobridge missing 5585 to 5655 Mhz
>
> Any ideas on how to fix this?
>
> Roy
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Radios won't operate on the same channel

[Mimbres Communications]

Right -- the old codes were for v5 firmware.  Once the activation is
complete, the v6 update will retain it.

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Roy  wrote:

>
>
> I have several codes but there is no "Activate" button.  At the suggestion
> of another member of the mailing list, I regressed the Nanobridge to 5.6.9
> and then the "Activate" button appeared.  I did than and then reinstalled
> 6.1.3.  Luckily I had a copy of 5.6.9 in my library
>
> To save anyone the digging to find out how to regress, I think these are
> the steps I used.
>
> 1) install 6.0.6
> 2) Install 6.0.6 beta
> 3) reboot
> 4) install 5.6.9
>
> Roy
>
>
>
>
> On 11/28/2017 9:55 PM, Mimbres Communications wrote:
>
> Do you have an unlock code for the NBM5?
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Roy  wrote:
>
>>
>> I have a Nanobridge running 6.1.3 trying to connect to a Nanostation
>> also running 6.1.3
>>
>> The Nanostation is the AP and set for 5630 Mhz.  The Nanobridge won't
>> connect since it doesn't seem to allow operation on that channel?
>>
>> A check of allowed channels has the Nanobridge missing 5585 to 5655 Mhz
>>
>> Any ideas on how to fix this?
>>
>> Roy
>> ___________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] cannot find interference source

[Mimbres Communications]

Have you done an extended (like hours) airView run?

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Aaron McKillip <
aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com> wrote:

> Dual Band router?
>
> Aaron McKillip
> Hamilton Telecommunications
> 402-694-6655 <(402)%20694-6655>
>
> On Dec 6, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Jan Van Kort 
> wrote:
>
> It's just the one customer.  Neighbors to each side are just fine.
> Neighbors are about 1/4 mile away on same hillside in quasi-rural area.
> There are no other WISPs in area, no airFiber that I've found.  AirView
> shows nothing worth getting excited about when problem isn't happening,
> when problem is happening Airview is not accessible as unit is not
> responding.  Rarely has problem occurred while I'm on the premises and goes
> away before I can zero in on it.   I'm suspecting large pumps, old
> transformers, bad neutral?  How to prove and stop wasting time and money on
> one customer?  Pulling hair time!
>
> On 2017-12-06 09:17 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Spectrum Analyzer and AirView both show real noise.
>
> You said you changed bands at the customer site, are there other customers
> on those APs that are having issues or is it this one guy?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Phil Curnutt  wrote:
>
>> I have on two occasions tried to cross the path of an AirFiber5 and had
>> the signal completely blocked.  Like Rory said they don't show up on Site
>> Surveys or noise figures, but are very apparent in AirView.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Rory Conaway 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Could still be noise.  Canopy and AFx equipment won't show up in the
>>> noise figures.
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>>> On Behalf Of Jan-OOLLC
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 11:07 PM
>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
>>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] cannot find interference source
>>>
>>> Have a client that is difficult to login to at times, service for them
>>> seems to quit.  Has good signal strength.  Have changed the radio to
>>> different models and frequencies and connected to different towers. It's
>>> like some kind of barrier at random times is erected between house and
>>> tower.  Site survey and spectrum analyzer never show anything remotely
>>> definitive as to possible cause or source of trouble.  Could problem be
>>> noisy electrical transformers or well pumps and what low-cost equipment
>>> would I need to find it?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This email and any attachments are confidential and
> may be protected by legal privilege. If you have received this email in
> error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete all
> copies of this email.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This email and any attachments are confidential and
> may be protected by legal privilege. If you have received this email in
> error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete all
> copies of this email.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] cannot find interference source

[Mimbres Communications]

>> J
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> -RickG
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -RickG
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC in 4.9ghz

[Mimbres Communications]

The airMAX AC products do not have 4.9 band approvals.

The LTU (PtMP) hardware is capable of operating in that band, but AFAIK the
business case for FCC approvals is still under discussion.

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Kevin Sullivan  wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> We have a city that is currently using AF4 links for what is really a very
> low bandwidth application. They need to add a few more sites, but the PtP
> nature of AF is making it difficult. I know Mimosa says that all of their
> 5ghz products are legal for use in the 4.9ghz band, (
> http://mimosa.co/publicsafety).
>
>
>
>  Does anyone know if the ubnt AC 5ghz line is legal to use in 4.9?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] cameras 1000ft through a forest

[Mimbres Communications]

How dense a forest?

2.4 GHz airMAX AC is cheap enough to test with.  7.5W max on the CPEs.

UVC Gen3 draws 4W max (less during the day when the IR is off).



On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan-OOLLC 
wrote:

> I have to get cameras up and have a forest in the way.  Range is a
> little over 1000ft from house, need to live monitor the road and catch
> dumpers.  What radios, how to keep them powered and what cameras should
> I think about for first attempt?
>
> --
>
> Jan V
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC in 4.9ghz

[Mimbres Communications]

 In the event that comment was directed at me, I will point out that my
name and phone number are in my .sig


On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:44 AM, Faisal Imtiaz 
wrote:

> 
>
> Love replies on a public forum from generic email address and no
> identifier as to who is the poster...
>
> Fake News ! .. Russian Trolls !.. or maybe it is just  "Figment" from
> Disney/Epcot !
>
> 
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Mimbres Communications" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Thursday, January 25, 2018 2:53:53 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AC in 4.9ghz
>
> The airMAX AC products do not have 4.9 band approvals.
> The LTU (PtMP) hardware is capable of operating in that band, but AFAIK
> the business case for FCC approvals is still under discussion.
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Kevin Sullivan <
> kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>>
>>
>> We have a city that is currently using AF4 links for what is really a
>> very low bandwidth application. They need to add a few more sites, but the
>> PtP nature of AF is making it difficult. I know Mimosa says that all of
>> their 5ghz products are legal for use in the 4.9ghz band, (
>> http://mimosa.co/publicsafety).
>>
>>
>>
>>  Does anyone know if the ubnt AC 5ghz line is legal to use in 4.9?
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Decisions... decisions - Switches

[Mimbres Communications]

Worth noting that going forward, UniFi switches will no longer support
passive PoE.

Regardless, as a WISP, I would choose EdgeSwitch.  The ES-8-150W
includes a barrier
strip for DC input. EdgeSwitch can be managed using UNMS (not feature
complete by any means, but it's evolving quickly).

I'm looking forward to some redundant PSU options (currently available in
two pre-release models of UniFi switch) for  EdgeSwitch.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:44 AM, ralph  wrote:

> I love the fact that some Ubiquiti switches can provide both 802.3af and
> passive 24V. I like the management and the fact that (I think) SNMP
> actually works, unlike the Toughswitches.  I am not interested in Netonix
> products.
>
>
>
> There are 2 versions of the 150 watt 8 port Edgeswitch:  The Unifi one and
> the “regular” one.
>
> My dilemma has to do with the type of management.
>
>
>
> ·   I think the Unifi one is nice in that it can be managed by a
> controller.  The problem is that what do I do if I go away from Unifi
> stuff, or UBNT kills the Unifi line.  I don’t know if it can also be
> managed by SSH or a web GUI.   Does it become a boat anchor? Any idea
> anyone?
>
>
>
> ·   The non-Unifi one looks like it is the exact same switch without
> the Unifi management. I know it has a GUI and probably an SSH ability as
> well.
>
>
>
> I would love you guys’ opinion.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Ralph
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Decisions... decisions - Switches

[Mimbres Communications]

Yes, EdgeSwitches have onboard config tools, both WebUI and SSH/console.

UNMS can monitor, backup configs, and upgrade firmware on EdgeSwitches and
ToughSwitches (recently rebranded as EdgeSwitch XP) currently.Full
configuration support might be 2019.   Roadmap is at the bottom of
https://unms.com/ (scroll down a bit).



On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:24 PM, ralph  wrote:

> UNMS- OK. I am playing with it already.
>
> Web GUI- It has, correct?
>
> SSH- It has, correct.
>
>
>
> And thanks for the heads up on the passive POE. That probably rules it out
> right there!
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Mimbres Communications
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 14, 2018 1:59 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Decisions... decisions - Switches
>
>
>
> Worth noting that going forward, UniFi switches will no longer support
> passive PoE.
>
>
>
> Regardless, as a WISP, I would choose EdgeSwitch.  The ES-8-150W includes
> a barrier strip for DC input. EdgeSwitch can be managed using UNMS (not
> feature complete by any means, but it's evolving quickly).
>
>
>
> I'm looking forward to some redundant PSU options (currently available in
> two pre-release models of UniFi switch) for  EdgeSwitch.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:44 AM, ralph  wrote:
>
> I love the fact that some Ubiquiti switches can provide both 802.3af and
> passive 24V. I like the management and the fact that (I think) SNMP
> actually works, unlike the Toughswitches.  I am not interested in Netonix
> products.
>
>
>
> There are 2 versions of the 150 watt 8 port Edgeswitch:  The Unifi one and
> the “regular” one.
>
> My dilemma has to do with the type of management.
>
>
>
> ·   I think the Unifi one is nice in that it can be managed by a
> controller.  The problem is that what do I do if I go away from Unifi
> stuff, or UBNT kills the Unifi line.  I don’t know if it can also be
> managed by SSH or a web GUI.   Does it become a boat anchor? Any idea
> anyone?
>
>
>
> ·   The non-Unifi one looks like it is the exact same switch without
> the Unifi management. I know it has a GUI and probably an SSH ability as
> well.
>
>
>
> I would love you guys’ opinion.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Ralph
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] unifi replacement mounting brackets

[Mimbres Communications]

The plastic mounting brackets, or the metal plates that go behind a ceiling
tile?
I have a number of the metal plates here.

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:29 PM, Kurt Fankhauser 
wrote:

> Does anyone have any spare mounting plates for the old Unifi AP LR's? I
> need about 3 of the plates.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airrouter

[Mimbres Communications]

We installed two airCube ISPs at a customer site in January (as soon as
router mode became available).  One is in router mode doing NAT and the
second is in bridge mode behind it, connected via Netgear HomePlug that the
customer had on hand (straw bale house, plenty of attenuation).  Customer
is very happy with the coverage.

The firmware is evolving quickly at this point -- once they have wireless
client mode, we can start putting them into entertainment centers as a
remote hub.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

> We are testing the Aircubes.  Two of the smaller units cost the same as an
> Airrouter HP and coverage should be the same.  I can’t get over the idea
> that Mimosa and Ubiquiti don’t think external antennas are important but
> that’s just me.  We kept some 3-4dBi big antennas in stock for upgrading
> the AirRouter HPs for more range and they work.  Have to be careful with
> some crappy units on the market though.  We found some garbage ones.
>
> Either way, we are moving to the AirCubes.  The G2’s from Mimosa work fine
> with relaying so we expect the same thing from the AirCubes.  We have been
> testing them and other than few features missing that we don’t need yet, we
> have them working with UNMS so we are moving forward with them when the
> Airrouters run out.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org  *On
> Behalf Of *RickG
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2018 5:11 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Airrouter
>
>
>
> Are those user-friendly via smart-phone? I've had 80 year old women who
> admit they know nothing set up their google wifi.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Shawn C. Peppers <
> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hap Lite AC
>
> :: // Shawn Peppers
>
> :: // DirectlinkAdmin.com
>
>
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 7:31 PM, RickG  wrote:
>
> Google WiFi Mesh points (3-pack).
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
>
> Since AirRouters are gone, and the new cubes are too poor in coverage and
> you need an APP on cell phone to program them, for those who have been
> using them, what are you going to for replacements that are as good as the
> HP model AirRouter, and has that price point?
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -RickG
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -RickG
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Buying fees horns

[Mimbres Communications]

AFAIK they are still 'coming soon'
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-AC/Purchase-Feedhorn-Only/m-p/2294839#M29928

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:

> Ugh
>
> On Apr 17, 2018, at 22:28, alex phillips  wrote:
>
> We need a distributor to ask for them so we can buy them otherwise no one
> has them in stock.
>
> *Alex Phillips*
> CEO and General Manager
> RBNS.net
> HighSpeedLink.net
> *540-908-3993*
> Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
> September 6-8th 2018
> #AMP18
> @PriorityConf Twitter
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Matt Hoppes  rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>
>> Can you still buy just the AC fees horn?
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgerouter Infinity BGP

[Mimbres Communications]

ISTR some reports on the UBNT forum of users running BIRD on EdgeOS with
better results than the default (ZebOS IIRC) routing daemon.

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> You'll need to do your homework on this. A lot of people think CCRs are
> okay for BGP full tables, but they're not. If they think it's okay, then
> they simply don't realize they're being screwed over.
>
> So you'll have to make sure that whomever says the Infinity is good
> actually knows what they're talking about. The platforms (CCR and Infinity)
> have little to nothing in common, but it reminds us all to be cautious.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Tim Densmore" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:45:22 PM
> *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] Edgerouter Infinity BGP
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Can anyone share experiences with the er infinity in regards to BGP
> performance?  I've read several places that it'll take several full
> feeds with no problem, which is obviously great.  However, the few
> reports I've seen that discuss convergence performance are fairly
> pessimal.  Can anyone shed light on their real world experience with
> running the er infinity in an environment with eBGP, iBGP, and OSPF?  Is
> it actually taking 15 min to re-converge after a peer is lost?  That
> seems absurdly long to me, but I have zero experience in the $1500-3000
> BGP router market so maybe my expectations are unreasonable.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim Densmore
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgerouter Infinity BGP

[Mimbres Communications]

You might check out the Link Technologies PowerRouter series if you want a
pre-built, fully supported option.



On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Tim Densmore <
tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com> wrote:

>
> Some of
> the places we'd be putting these we need them to be 1 or 2 RU, rack
> mountable, and/or DC.  Do you have a vendor you recommend?  I have
> basically zero clue in the whitebox switch/router/appliance world.  I'm
> guessing folks aren't sticking full blown rack-mountable Dell or HPE
> servers at their towers.



-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Replacement PBE-5AC Feedhorns

[Mimbres Communications]

No 2AC replacements feedhorns (yet).

The 300mm and 400mm feedhorns are physically and electrically identical.
There is something in there (low level firmware or perhaps a jumper) that
tells the firmware what the antenna gain is -- thus limiting EIRP and
tweaking the DFS sensitivity.

UBNT was looking into adding a software switch to the firmware, but I
haven't seen an update for several months.





On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Kees H.  wrote:

> is there a different between 300 and 400 in the horn itself?  (other than
> name?)
>
> *From:* Phil Curnutt
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 07, 2018 9:54 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Warning UBNT did it again
>
> You can buy 400 horns from the Ubnt Store, qty. of 5 at $75 each.  But, no
> 300's or 620"s.  I asked Collin at Streakwave and he said he thought the
> minimum order for any of them was 200, so they don't stock them.  Guess
> Ubnt wants it to be worth there time to make them up.
>
> Phil
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:33 AM, alex phillips 
> wrote:
>
>> I would like to follow this up with, can I just buy the Horns?
>>
>> It would be great if we could just buy the parts we need.
>>
>> *Alex Phillips*
>> CEO and General Manager
>> RBNS.net
>> HighSpeedLink.net
>> *540-908-3993*
>>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirCube programming

[Mimbres Communications]

Once the management VLAN is enabled, you can access it from tagged packets
on the WAN port.

UNMS Mobile is capable of allowing untagged management access from the WAN
port.  It was not able to set a management VLAN the last time I tried.

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 12:00 PM Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> It shouldn't be accessible from the WAN port.  ;-)
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Kees H." 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Thursday, September 13, 2018 12:34:33 PM
> *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] AirCube programming 
>
> Now that the AirGateways LRs are EOL.
>
> How does one program the AirCube from the WAN port?
>
> Don't tell me to program it wirelessly, and that the password and WPA2
> keys
> are on the bottom.  Those are so small I can not read them and I will not
> spend the time to go the wireless route to program.  Whatever happened to
> ubnt & ubnt as login and password.
>
> Someone with too much time on their hands decided how to set up this
> router
> with out asking the wisps what they needed?
>
> Unless this cube is as easy to program as the AirGateway ( from the wan
> port) I will have to find another router that will program from the wan
> port.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS antenna

[Mimbres Communications]

AFAIK all of the current UBNT radios use the same passive antenna.

Some early AF units had active pucks, but I don't recall when that changed.


On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:12 AM Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> That's a hard NO!  I can't remember which ones don't interchange but I
> know between AF and Rockets they weren't (maybe the latest ones do but not
> back in the day).
>
> There's also multiple generations on AF5x/HD from what I've got in storage.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 11:10 AM Kees H.  wrote:
>
>> Which begs the question are all UBNT GPS antennas the same and
>> interchangeable?
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Blair Davis
>> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:40 PM
>> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] GPS antenna
>>
>> Anybody know of a replacement GPS antenna for UBNT 2AC units?
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Support?

[Mimbres Communications]

Have to admit I've never actually used that email.

We get fast enough response (generally from someone with a clue) via the
Community.

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:57 AM Nick Bright  wrote:

> Does anybody know how long it usually takes supp...@ubnt.com to respond
> to an inquiry? I emailed them 5 days ago and it's been radio silence.
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti LBE-5AC

[Mimbres Communications]

Any chance you forgot to activate the revised U-NII rules?
[image: lbe-unii-rules.PNG]

On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:28 AM RickG  wrote:

> Anyone here know what's the deal with the LBE-5AC units? I've got several
> that will not select the UNII bands. I've tried upgrading the firmware.
> -RickG
>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Old 5 and 8 port tough switches

[Mimbres Communications]

Yes, mixing was required.
The switch chip buffer design was suboptimal.


On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:50 PM Blair Davis  wrote:

> My understanding on throughput problem with these was that it only
> occurred when port speeds were mixed...
>
> Some 100tx and some 1000Tx.
>
> If all were 100Tx or 1000Tx the problem did not happen...
>
> Is this right?
>
> --
>
> --
> West Michigan Wireless ISP
> Allegan, Michigan  49010
> 269-686-8648
>
> A Division of:
> Camp Communication Services, INC
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] F-POE gen2 issue

[Mimbres Communications]

What's it connected to on the copper side?  The F-POE does not support
10/100baseTX Ethernet.

Is this an indoor or an outdoor application?

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:27 AM Clay Stewart 
wrote:

> Been working an issue for  couple days, thinking we had a fiber run issue
> in new run, lateral, SFP, etc...
>
> But emulating the setup on a table, I find the issue is the gen2 is
> connecting 1g on fiber end, and 100Mbps on cat5 side and NOT passing any
> traffic.
>
> Anyone have any experience with this? We have dozens of 1st gens setup for
> years with zero issues using same SFP and setup.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>


-- 

Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users