Re: [Ubnt_users] Airrouter

[Tyson]

mikrotik and cambium both have a cost effective router that would be a good 
replacement.


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Josh Luthman 
 Date: 4/12/18  8:16 AM  (GMT-06:00) To: Ubiquiti 
Users Group  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Airrouter 
I went with cnPilot in this situation.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, 9:15 AM Clay Stewart  wrote:
Since AirRouters are gone, and the new cubes are too poor in coverage and you 
need an APP on cell phone to program them, for those who have been using them, 
what are you going to for replacements that are as good as the HP model 
AirRouter, and has that price point?
___

Ubnt_users mailing list

Ubnt_users@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Power Beam M5 question

[tyson]

The nanobridge will almost for sure be an xm board and highest firmware I've 
been running on xm is 5.6.15 I think is what it is.  It's the one that also has 
the Verizon 400mhz fix as an option as well.  On xw I've been running 6.04.  I 
know they have 6.07 out but I haven't even looked into newer than 6.04 yet.  
But regardless of their firmware they should link upl as long as you set so to 
a channel and width that the station is able to connect to.  I'd double check 
to add uniI rules under system to both sides before throwing them up if it was 
me.


Sent from my Galaxy Tab® S2
 Original message From: Eduardo  Date: 
9/16/17  8:32 AM  (GMT-06:00) To: Ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: [Ubnt_users] 
Power Beam M5 question 



Hi,
 
Does anyone know if a PowerBeam M5-400 as a CEP will work with a NanoBridge 
M5-400 as an AP?
 
NanoBridge M5-400 is out of production and I wonder if PowerBeam M5-400 can 
work as a replacement.
 
Thanks,
Eduardo Mejia
Webjogger
www.webjogger.net
 ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[tyson]

 
lol.  I almost said..never had to use that feature before not really sure 
how it will work but I was definitely curious.
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation
From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" 
Date: 7/27/17 6:35 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

  
um, no, it won't ;)
 
 - Original Message -
From: CBB - Jay Fuller
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:18 PM
Subject: [Ubnt_users] client isolation
 
 
 
Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in 
backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to other 
businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the access 
point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
There are only two people on the access point in question.
 
Thanks :)
 
 
  
 ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  ___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] changing channels on me?

[Tyson]

i answered to quick earlier.  i hadn't read back far enough to understand your 
problem.  I'm actually still confused some what your problem is.  A ss of your 
wireless tab of a radio that your talking about would help.  So your saying 
that on a power beam  m5 it's set to an auto channel or a channel in the wrong 
range you normally use after a firmware update to 6.04. Is that right?  That 
doesn't make a lot of sense unless the pbe m5 is the AP as the AP dictates the 
channel.  that's where I'm confused the most.


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Jan Van Kort 
<j.vank...@oregononline.net> Date: 7/26/17  3:36 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: 
ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] changing channels on me? 

using pbe-m5-400, 6.04 at present, most of the m5 gear are pbe. 
  Am wondering if the update to 6.04 put any of them into auto
  channel mode?




On 07/26/2017 12:58 PM, Tyson wrote:



  
  pretty sure Josh is right on.  on the stations that don't
have the channels that the newer ones have update the firmware.
 can't remember what version is the oldest that accepts it, but
5.6.2 kind of rings a bell.  we have 6.0.4  and I know that
works.  to add more channels need to  activate
  UNII rules under the system tab on all our m5 gear so that
  doesn't happen.  Nanostation m5s throw me off the most since
  they do some eds channels but not all so it's easier to get
  lucky and work out of the box and forget on them.
  

  
  

  
  

  
  
Sent from my
  Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
  
  

  
  
 Original message 
From: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
Date: 7/26/17 3:08 PM (GMT-05:00) 
To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org> 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] changing channels on me? 



  
  Are you saying the station's frequency is only
doing the upper channels?  Depending on which m5 radio it is,
you might not have access to 5.1 or 5.4 (pre/post an FCC key...)
  


  

  

  
  Josh Luthman

  Office: 937-552-2340

  Direct: 937-552-2343

  1100 Wayne St

  Suite 1337

  Troy, OH 45373
  



On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Jan
  Van Kort <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
  wrote:

  

  channel 37 does not have a (DFS) next to it in the list

  
   

On
  07/26/2017 11:55 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:


  
  

  
DFS channels it will have to vacate,
  yes.
  

  
  I suggest setting multiple frequencies on the
AP so it cycles through them.



  

  



Josh Luthman

Office: 937-552-2340

Direct: 937-552-2343

1100 Wayne St

Suite 1337

Troy, OH 45373

  
  

  On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at
2:53 PM, Jan Van Kort <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
wrote:

two issues: I've got
  some m5 gear that seem able to change channels

  after install on their own.  I've found a
  couple that were in auto mode

  (never allowed here) and a few more that were
  in not normal channel

  selections.  Does this happen as a result of
  firmware updates?

  

  I've noticed on the newer radios they have a
  wider range of channel

  selections, but this seems weird as another
  new one out of same parts

  order pile won't have the same range.  I'll
  set the access point for

  channel 37 and go over to the receive station
  and it won't see it.

  Cannot connect them, the station will only go
  

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 2AC Prism Firmware compatibility

[tyson]

ok.  Just read it correctly.  Ricks right.  xm firmware on any xm hardware.  xw 
firmware on any xw hardware.  You can see what it is under the system tab where 
you upload the firmware at.  failsafe is it wont let you flash the wrong one on 
it.
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 2AC Prism 
Firmware compatibility
From: "RickG" 
Date: 7/18/17 11:24 am
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

 You may need both depending on your mix of CPE.

 On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Jay Weekley  
wrote:
 I'm upgrading the firmware for some clients for compatibility with the
 Rocket 2AC Prism.  Do I need the XW.v.6.0.4 or XM.v.6.0.4 firmware versions?
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 


  
-- 
   -RickG



___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 2AC Prism Firmware compatibility

[tyson]

havent done any 2's yet.  But for 5.8 it needs to be 6.0 or higher.  Ive been 
using 6.0.4 personally.
 
- Original Message - Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 2AC Prism 
Firmware compatibility
From: "Jay Weekley" 
Date: 7/18/17 11:02 am
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

I'm upgrading the firmware for some clients for compatibility with the 
 Rocket 2AC Prism. Do I need the XW.v.6.0.4 or XM.v.6.0.4 firmware versions?
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 2nd request Fwd: wifi cell phone content blocked? Access Point generates insecure warnings

[tyson]

Definitely a awkward issue.  The router wont be able to tell the difference 
between a tablet/phone and a pc that I know of.  Id try to take off security 
and see if that helped or try a new router.  I like the idea of duplicating the 
settings on a different router if hose 2 things dont help.  There was a 
customer a few years ago who reported a similar issue but was just one tablet 
and what was happening was loading youtube videos from cache or preload option 
and they was not even connected to their router so couldn't load any other 
content.  Good Luck curious as to what the issue ends up being.
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2nd request Fwd: 
wifi cell phone content blocked? Access Point generates insecure warnings
From: "Tommy Adams" 
Date: 7/17/17 11:36 am
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

 Duplicate your settings on a TP-Link or some such router and see it issue 
remains. 


 
Tommy A.
Digitex.com
 
817.558.6230 V
817.558.1204 F


On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Jan-OOLLC  wrote:


   
 
 
  Forwarded Message    Subject: wifi cell phone content 
blocked? Access Point generates insecure warnings  Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 
08:42:47 -0700  From: Jan-OOLLC   To: 'Ubiquiti 
Users Group'    
 
 
 Are the 2 related? I'm getting user complaints over cell-phone wifi 
 content being blocked. Laptops connecting to same ubiquiti router don't 
 exhibit same problem. Notably facebook and twitter videos won't load 
 and run on cell phones/tablets, youtube seems to work. Have called the 
 cell phone providers and UBNT support, nothing helpful occurred.
 
 -- 
 
 Jan V
 
 

  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?

[tyson]

I had 2 go out in a storm last Friday.  Was actually a weird scenario because 
both poe units blinked indicating a short i think.  Either way swapped out the 
prisms and working again.  I as well had them up less than a month and none of 
the other AC or Motorola equipment on tower affected though.  Just the gen 2 
Prisms.
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 
AC Gen2 dead LAN port?
From: "James Craig via Ubnt_users" 
Date: 7/11/17 5:19 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
Cc: "Principal WISPA Member List" 

 Hi Mike,  
I'd like to get this one back, sending you an email.
 
 
 


 On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Mike Lyon  wrote:
  Anyone seen a LAN port die on a Rocket M5 AC Gen2 radio? deployed one about a 
month ago and then suddenly, the LAN port died on it. LAN light on radio lights 
up but I don't get any link to an device I plug it into. I tried resetting it, 
still no love. PoE still works and all lights light up on it.  
It only lasted a month :(
 
-Mike

  
-- 
Mike Lyon
mike.l...@gmail.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
 
 
 






___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  

___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] New RP-5AC-Gen2 with a AM5G20-90 sector antenna

[Tyson]

also an important note, you can't have an ac client with a regular m5 rocket 
ap.  you can use an a.c. prism rocket gen 2 (or any ac rocket) on a regular 
ubnt 5Ghz sector as ap though and have an ac or regular m5 client and that 
scenario would work just fine.  I do wish it was backwards compatible both ways 
but its not.  you have to have the a.c. as the AP not station unless both sides 
are ac.  


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Jeremy Austin  
Date: 6/29/17  5:05 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New RP-5AC-Gen2 with a 
AM5G20-90 sector antenna 
How long is a piece of string?
This wold be hard to say without more info… Missing parameters, among others:
Output power (related to center frequency)Bandwidth in megahertz (e.g., 10, 20, 
40)Distance to client(s), client antenna gain, client output powerNoise 
floorNumber of expected clients
Care to share any other details about how you wish to deploy, and whether you 
are comparing it to something you're already using?
If you're wanting something quick-and-dirty, Ubiquiti has a calculator at 
airlink.ubnt.com — but it does require some 'interpretation'. For instance, it 
does not calculate a fade margin — you have to do that yourself.

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Eduardo  wrote:




Does anybody has tried this combination? 
 
I wan to know how much bandwidth can I expect with this combination.
 
Thanks,
Eduardo Mejia
 

___

Ubnt_users mailing list

Ubnt_users@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users





-- 
Jeremy Austin
(907) 895-2311 office(907) 803-5422 celljhaus...@gmail.com
Heritage NetWorksWhitestone Power & CommunicationsVertical Broadband, LLC

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Multiple APs with same SSID

[tyson]

 
Ive left it like that with multiple ssids for a few weeks before even, but in 
the end it always pays to bite the bullet and switch the appropriate people 
over to the newly named sector.  Copy and pasting ssids while at same time 
rebooting the other ap is sometimes the only way to get it right if they have a 
poor signal yet connected to the wrong ap.
- Original Message - Subject: [Ubnt_users] Multiple APs with 
same SSID
From: "Josh Luthman" 
Date: 6/26/17 10:05 am
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

 I had an AP with a bit too many people on it and we put up a second AP to 
overlap the coverage.  The customers all rebooted and they've been 
appropriately connected to the correct AP for the last few days.  
Has anyone ever changed the SSIDs to make sure they're locked to the right AP?  
(I'm not willing to do lock to MAC).  Or have you just left multiple APs with 
the same SSID and things turned out all right?
 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373




___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Need help with System Log readings

[tyson]

If you have clear los and its a half mile link at a -70 signal there is 
definitely an issue.  you should have a much better signal.  I have had some 
strange scenarios with a high signal and what appeared to be clear los but 
elevation, or the tilt on the ap was off and I needed to lower the antennae at 
the client side as low as I could go or the opposite, raise it as high as I 
safely can to get the best possible signal.  I agree its probably a little bit 
of interference causing havoc on a mediocre signal.  Get that signal better and 
your problem will most likely go away.   
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Need help with 
System Log readings
From: "Chris Fabien" 
Date: 8/24/12 12:34 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

My experience says interference can cause the WPA keying errors. Might
 fire up airview next time it happens, if you could get airview of the
 client side it would probably help a lot, since it seems only this CPE
 is affected?
 
 On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Rodger Lewis
  wrote:
 > What are your signal levels between 5am-8am?
 > Do you have fog?
 >
 > -70 and -72 are not the best signals. A little bit of rain or fog
 > would disconnect them.
 >
 > Are shooting across a highway that might have more traffic during that
 > time period?
 >
 > The authentication was showing it was having problems in the logs.
 > This is indicative of poor connection or interference causing bad
 > packets and retries over the air.
 >
 > Rodger Lewis, VP
 > Velocity Online
 > 850-205-4638 x201
 >
 >
 >
 > Quoting "Joey Craig"  on Fri 24 Aug 2012
 > 11:01:24 AM EDT:
 >
 >> We have one client off of an AP that continually get disassociated from it
 >> every morning between 5am-8am. A different client coming off the same AP
 >> lives next door and has no issues.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> The client in question was struck by lightning approximately a month ago and
 >> we went out and replaced the NS2/POE with a Bullet2-hp/flat panel antenna.
 >> (They had signal issues previously to the strike. Went ahead and upgraded at
 >> this time.)
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> After about 2 weeks, they started having connection problems between 5am-8am
 >> every day. Both clients are located on a large farming operation, not to
 >> rule out interference issue. Yesterday, we went out early and did a spectrum
 >> analysis which showed no issues with interference. We replaced the problem
 >> client's radio, antenna, POE and all new wiring. That improved the signal by
 >> 8db at the time.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> Currently, the client sees the AP at a -70 signal, 100% ccq and -95 noise.
 >> The AP is seeing the client at -72, 100% ccq, noise -96. Clear line of site
 >> at a distance of half mile between units.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> Again this morning, the client called having the same issue. In checking the
 >> logs on the CPE and AP, I am seeing the same items as before.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> Client Side
 >>
 >> Aug 24 07:28:17 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: Trying to associate with
 >> 00:15:6d:ea:e8:76 (SSID='Dutchman96' freq=2412 MHz)
 >> Aug 24 07:28:17 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: Associated with
 >> 00:15:6d:ea:e8:76
 >> Aug 24 07:28:20 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: WPA: 4-Way Handshake failed
 >> - pre-shared key may be incorrect
 >> Aug 24 07:28:20 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED -
 >> Disconnect event - remove keys
 >> Aug 24 07:28:22 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
 >> Aug 24 07:28:22 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: Trying to associate with
 >> 00:15:6d:ea:e8:76 (SSID='Dutchman96' freq=2412 MHz)
 >> Aug 24 07:28:32 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: Authentication with
 >> 00:15:6d:ea:e8:76 timed out.
 >> Aug 24 07:28:34 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
 >> Aug 24 07:28:34 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: Trying to associate with
 >> 00:15:6d:ea:e8:76 (SSID='Dutchman96' freq=2412 MHz)
 >> Aug 24 07:28:41 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
 >> Aug 24 07:28:41 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: Associated with
 >> 00:15:6d:ea:e8:76
 >> Aug 24 07:28:41 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: WPA: Key negotiation
 >> completed with 00:15:6d:ea:e8:76 [PTK=TKIP GTK=TKIP]
 >> Aug 24 07:28:41 Limerick Farms user.info syslog: CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED -
 >> Connection to 00:15:6d:ea:e8:76 completed (reauth) [id=0 id_str=]
 >> Aug 24 07:30:59 Limerick Farms syslog.info -- MARK -
 >>
 >>
 >> AP Side
 >> Aug 24 07:26:25 Rusty Dutchman South syslog.info -- MARK --
 >> Aug 24 07:26:29 Rusty Dutchman South daemon.info hostapd: ath0: STA
 >> 00:15:6d:f8:7e:66 WPA: group key handshake completed (RSN)
 >> Aug 24 07:28:17 Rusty Dutchman South daemon.info hostapd: ath0: STA
 >> 00:27:22:8a:15:91 IEEE 802.11: associated
 >> Aug 24 07:28:20 Rusty Dutchman South daemon.info hostapd: ath0: STA
 >> 00:27:22:8a:15:91 IEEE 802.11: deauthenticated due to local deauth 

Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions

[tyson]

airos.  i saw your ipv6 comment and was looking at release notes on firmware 
when i stopped to read mail so my mind was on airos and just responded without 
thinking.  :-)
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions
From: "Josh Luthman" 
Date: 5/24/17 12:35 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

 Ipv6 or Airos v6?

 Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


 On May 24, 2017 12:29 PM,  wrote:
  So, now that its been brought up is anyone having good luck with any v6 in 
ptmp?  I've put very little on v6 yet honestly.
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
From: "Mathew Howard" 
Date: 5/24/17 12:21 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

  or they're all just done complaining about bugs in v6... :p
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of 
Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:00 AM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
 
 
Everyone's busy updating to v6
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373


 On May 24, 2017 9:55 AM, "Kevin Melson"  wrote:
yeah it appears to be workingloli thought it was just me since i 
havent seen anything in several days
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kevin Melson
 Eagle One Wireless\PC Station
 2007 Hwy 72 E
 Corinth, MS 38834
 662-287-1722
 e...@e1w.com
 www.e1w.com
  
 
 
 
 From:  ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of ty...@wigi.us
 Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 8:52 AM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
 
  
 
Im just glad to see mine is working.  I thought my lists seemed pretty inactive.
 
 - Original Message -
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
 From: "Bob Greene" 
 Date: 5/24/17 9:47 am
 To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
  I think it is working.
  
   From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Kevin Melson
 Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:45 AM
 To:  ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Subject: [Ubnt_users] test
 


 test
 havent gotten any emails from this group in like a week
 just making sure it works
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kevin Melson
 Eagle One Wireless\PC Station
 2007 Hwy 72 E
 Corinth, MS 38834
 662-287-1722
 e...@e1w.com
 www.e1w.com
  
 
 
 
 
___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 




___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  

___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions

[tyson]

I should have been more clear.  firmware 6.0 to 6.0.4 for regular m5 and m2 gear
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions
From: "Shawn C. Peppers" 
Date: 5/24/17 12:31 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

 With ubnt its only gonna work if you bridge the customers station.  Also i 
dont even think the v8+ supports ipv6last i checked.

Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv


On May 24, 2017, at 11:28 AM, ty...@wigi.us wrote:


  So, now that its been brought up is anyone having good luck with any v6 in 
ptmp?  I've put very little on v6 yet honestly.
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
From: "Mathew Howard" 
Date: 5/24/17 12:21 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

  or they're all just done complaining about bugs in v6... :p
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of 
Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:00 AM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
 
 
Everyone's busy updating to v6
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373


 On May 24, 2017 9:55 AM, "Kevin Melson"  wrote:
yeah it appears to be workingloli thought it was just me since i 
havent seen anything in several days
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kevin Melson
 Eagle One Wireless\PC Station
 2007 Hwy 72 E
 Corinth, MS 38834
 662-287-1722
 e...@e1w.com
 www.e1w.com
  
 
 
 
 From:  ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of ty...@wigi.us
 Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 8:52 AM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
 
  
 
Im just glad to see mine is working.  I thought my lists seemed pretty inactive.
 
 - Original Message -
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
 From: "Bob Greene" 
 Date: 5/24/17 9:47 am
 To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
  I think it is working.
  
   From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Kevin Melson
 Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:45 AM
 To:  ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Subject: [Ubnt_users] test
 


 test
 havent gotten any emails from this group in like a week
 just making sure it works
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kevin Melson
 Eagle One Wireless\PC Station
 2007 Hwy 72 E
 Corinth, MS 38834
 662-287-1722
 e...@e1w.com
 www.e1w.com
  
 
 
 
 
___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 




___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] test

[tyson]

 
Im just glad to see mine is working.  I thought my lists seemed pretty inactive.
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
From: "Bob Greene" 
Date: 5/24/17 9:47 am
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

  I think it is working.
  
   From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Kevin Melson
 Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:45 AM
 To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Subject: [Ubnt_users] test
 


 test
 havent gotten any emails from this group in like a week
 just making sure it works
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kevin Melson
 Eagle One Wireless\PC Station
 2007 Hwy 72 E
 Corinth, MS 38834
 662-287-1722
 e...@e1w.com
 www.e1w.com
  
 
 
 
 
___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2

[tyson]

They are sold out in the Beta store to  :-/  I missed the bandwagon on that one 
myself.
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2
From: "Mathew Howard" 
Date: 3/29/17 3:42 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

  2.4ghz AC is still in beta, but they do exist.
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of 
Steve D [bigd...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:38 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2
 
 
Isn't AC 5GHz only?  Or have I been living under a rock?  
-Steve D


 On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Mathew Howard   wrote:
I upgraded a few 2.4ghz XM radios to 6.0.2 yesterday (needed AC 
compatibility)... so far so good, I haven't run into any problem yet.
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of 
Nick Bright [nick.bri...@valnet.net]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 10:28 PM
 To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2
 
 
Mitch, asking the real questions!
 Has anybody tried out 6.0.1/2 on 2.4Ghz XM Hardware? That's what most of my 
stuff is.
 
 On 3/28/2017 8:11 PM, Mitch wrote:
 Any Idea on how close a fix for crashing radios? 
 
 On 03/28/2017 08:01 PM, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
I'm seeing it on most products:New: - New: SNMP OIDs for CPU and Memory 
utilisation
 - New: Update dropbear to v2016.74
 - New: OpenSSL update to v1.0.2k
 - New: libevent update to v2.1.8
 
 Fixes:
 - Fix: PTP mode stability and performance improvements
 - Fix: Security fixes and improvements
 - Fix: ATPC fast restart added
 - Fix: Restore initial TX power on AP/PTP when ATPC is turned off
 - Fix: Revert Device Name strictness for DHCP Client (escape only hashtag 
# symbol which breaks DHCP Client 
operation)
 - Fix: Station fails re-authentication with AP when the same SSID is used for 
other APs
 - Fix: Stations start disassociating from AP (PTMP)
 - Fix: ATPC feature enable/disable and ATPC target signal change interrupts 
wireless link
 - Fix: Wrong distance (100km) reporting after switching from Fixed to Auto 
Distance in airMAX PTP mode
 - Fix: Flow Control fix for WA products
 
 WEB UI:
 - WEB UI: Don't allow to remove BRIDGE0 interface containing WLAN0
 - WEB UI: "(Auto)" label missing on STA's Remote statistics in case ATPC is 
enabled on AP (PTP mode only)
 - WEB UI: Show more detailed error messages when upgrading invalid firmware
 - WEB UI: Improved Station List for small screens like mobile
 - WEB UI: Change status.cgi output type from text/html to application/json
 - WEB UI: Password change validation fix  
 On Mar 28, 2017, at 8:59 PM, Mitch  wrote:

   I think it's the vulnerability fix 
 
 On 03/28/2017 07:54 PM, James Wilson wrote:
 I was wondering that too,  didn't see any release notes...

 On Mar 28, 2017 8:52 PM, "Kees H"  wrote:
 What is the difference?




 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  
 -- 
 Mitch Koep
 
 A Better Wireless
 218-851-8689 cell 
___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  
 -- 
 Mitch Koep
 
 A Better Wireless
 218-851-8689 cell 

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  
 -- 
 ---
 - Nick Bright -
 - Vice President of Technology -
 - Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
 - Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
 - Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
 ---
 - Are your files safe? -
 - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup -
 - More information & 30 day free trial at -
 - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
 ---
 
 This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information 
that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited 
from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise 
using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please 
promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message 
from your system. 






 ___
 

Re: [Ubnt_users] Https:

[tyson]

 
Wish I knew of one curious if anyone does.  :-)
- Original Message - Subject: [Ubnt_users] Https:
From: "Steve Barnes" 
Date: 2/3/17 10:04 am
To: "'Ubiquiti Users Group (ubnt_users@wispa.org)'" 

Having several thousand UBNT devices that use HTTPS, is there any way to get 
around the: Your Connection is not private, then clicking advanced and then 
Proceed to 10.0.0.1 (unsafe).
 
 Some I have turned the HTTPS off but would like the extra security when doing 
updates and the like.
 
 I have 6 techs and 10 systems that access all these and wanted to know if 
there was a work around.
 
 Steve Barnes
 Wireless Operations Manager
 New Lisbon Broadband
 NLBC.COM
 PCSWIN.COM
 765-584-2288 ext:1101
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5GHz UBNT Issue

[tyson]

My money is remote management is disabled.  I don't know why they make it 
disabled automatically after you upgrade it then make a change on some devices 
but not all, but there is a pop up warning you that it is disabled after you 
hit change.  I haven't paid enough attention maybe its a certain fw version 
that does this but i have seen it happen on a few.
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5GHz UBNT Issue
From: "Mitch" 
Date: 2/2/17 3:19 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

 Are these AC?
 
 On 02/02/2017 01:21 PM, Jorge Santiago wrote:
  Don't think is virus. Will reboot units later today to check.
 
Thanks 
 

  On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:35 PM Gino Villarini  wrote:
  Virus? 
 
From:  on behalf of Steve Barnes 

 
 
 Gino Villarini
President   Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968   
 
 Reply-To: Ubiquiti Group 
 Date: Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 2:30 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Group 


 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5GHz UBNT Issue

 
Did any updates get applied lately.  
  
 Check and see if the disable remote management was applied during update.  Had 
that happen a few times.  Can you ssh into them. 
  
 Steve Barnes
 Wireless Operations Manager
 NLBC.com
 PCSWIN.com
  
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 12:47 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5GHz UBNT Issue
 
  Noise floor has always been fake, I'd ignore it.
  Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 


  On Feb 2, 2017 12:45 PM, "Jorge Santiago"  wrote:
  Rebooting won't fix.  
 

  On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Justin Wilson  wrote:
 Reboots fix it?
 
 Justin Wilson
 j...@mtin.net
 
 ---
 http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
 xISP Solutions- Consulting - Data Centers - Bandwidth
 
 http://www.midwest-ix.com  COO/Chairman
 Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
   
 > On Feb 2, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Jorge Santiago  wrote:
 >
 > I have two customers, relatively close to our tower, and cannot log into 
 > their CPE. Starting happening a few days ago customer will complain of slow 
 > speeds.
 >
 >
 > Any idea?
 >
 > Jorge
 

> <5GHz UBNT.png>___
 > Ubnt_users mailing list
 > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 

 

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 





___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 




 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  
 -- 
 Mitch Koep
 
 A Better Wireless
 218-851-8689 cell ___ Ubnt_users 
mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp

[tyson]

Im no expert on the matter so probably shouldnt chime inBut, Ive 
never gone off of what a ubnt speed test shows, always considered not very 
accurate.  Ive put cheaper mikrotiks at my problem childs house (customers who 
complain) before and tested connections that way though cause mikrotiks use 
iperf which in my experience is more accurate.  That being said I personally 
like to go to the customers house having the problem and take their que out to 
see what kind of speed they are capable of not metered.  Also as stated earlier 
95% of the time when a whole AP isnt performing up to par doing an airview and 
picking a cleaner channel or swapping channels has resolved most of our issues. 
 Especially on 2.4  I wish all of our stuff was 5.8 not half the problems with 
interference or performance.
 
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. 
gotta love being a wisp
From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" 
Date: 1/5/17 12:03 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

  
Ok - I appreciate your opinion.  I did provide my bandwidth graphs - they are 
no where near 40-50 meg - although I am using 10 mhz channels, so i am assuming 
I could expect 25 meg or so.  In theory, no one is goin to be maxxing out their 
connection.  They may have 10 meg available to them but they're going to be 
using 4 meg.  Sometimes 6 if they're streaming more than one tv.  Lets say 6 of 
the 14 are streaming - that is 24 meg - and the usage graph does not show 
they're getting there. 
 
Let me ask this in a different way.  During "peak" times - lets say 9 pm at 
night - should the ubnt speed test to the customer in duplex mode be more or 
less accurate?  
 
Thanks :)
 
 
 - Original Message -
From: Tim Kerns
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp
 
In my opinion, anyone  that is selling 10 meg packages on UBNT AP's (except 5 
gig AC's) is pushing it.
 
In a point to point I can get 100 meg between the 2 radios. In a Multipoint 
environment, the best you will see is 40-50 megs aggregate (using 20 meg 
channels) for the AP.
So how many 10 meg customers can you put on it? and if the ones on there are 
streaming video, and HD Net flick @ 6 megs.
 
I just love the WISP selling 40 megs to customers using UBNT gear and then 
expect to get 10-20 clients on it.
 
Also, remember the Rocket M's have 100 meg Ethernet and it won't pass more 
than 100 megs.
 
From: CBB - Jay Fuller
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 8:17 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp


 

 
will play with 5.6.9 later today - anyone else able to comment on this?
back to the initial question - am i trying too hard with 10 meg packages on 2.4 
rockets with these numbers?
should the radios be able to do that?

do i need to go post in ubnt forums? :)
 
maybe i will lol
 
 
 - Original Message -
From: RickG
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp
 
Yes and the time frame matches the 5.6.x FW suspicion. It comes & goes and so 
far I have not been able to pinpoint it.
 
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Ken Patrick  wrote:
  Jay,  
We get these complaints from customers and I have always ignored it as long as 
everything looks fine from our end.
But this has increased significantly since the Virus and 5.6.x firmware and I 
think we need to critically look at it and not dismiss it. There is no way a 
ton of customers can be hallucinating at the same time
 
The complaints are usually in the form of its slow or  the internet goes off 
and on especially if you are on the DFS band.
 
Is anyone else experiencing this kinds of complaints ??
 
 
Regards
 

 
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:45 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller  
wrote:

oh, if you're wondering, management downgraded him to our lowest package today 
and said "do not upgrade him even if he asks"
we suspect he'll visit his parents more :)
base package is 3 meg
 
 
 - Original Message -
From: CBB - Jay Fuller
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 9:40 PM
Subject: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp
 
 
We've got an average of 14 users on our 2.4 rockets.  10 mhz channels.  some 
are sectors, some are omnis.
 
Currently one 2.4 rocket has 13 connections (one guy dropped for t-mobile??!!)  
 I guess that makes sense, no one
else has t-mobile down here - so here are the current stats :
 
airmax quality - 83%
airmax capacity - 80%
 
here is the stations list and their signals - 
 

 
Access point is running 6.0 ; stations are 5.6.3  
That'll change soon - maybe end of January.
 
 
I have a 2nd 2.4 rocket we are also monitoring - it also has 14 users on it
 
airmax quality is 75%
airmax capacity is 70%
 
also running 6.0  

Re: [Ubnt_users] Reboot problem when connecting to AP

[Tyson]

So multiple clients all reboot at the same time or just every different kind of 
ubnt gear you use at this particular location reboots when it associates.  
Either way...sounds like u have done a clean install at this location so 
should work unless the ap is the problem.  If its just one location off an Ap 
and you think the AP is good then even though you said you already have changed 
wires, poe, ect major stumpers like you are describing usually lead back to a 
wire in my exp or even possibly a poe.  Id double check the wire tho if its 
isolated to one location and tried a handful of different cpe's


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Rory Conaway  
Date: 12/27/16  9:42 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
 Subject: [Ubnt_users] Reboot problem when connecting to 
AP 


We tried 3 different PB400 nose cones, a NB19, and different versions of 
firmware from 5.6.2 to 5.6.9 and a couple of beta versions including v6.0 beta 
15 and as soon as the client connects to the AP, the PB400’s and NB19’s reboot. 
 We
 have used different cables, power supplies, etc… Putting on 6.0 right now but 
this is just weird.  We have also tried multiple IP addresses in case there was 
an IP conflict.   Any ideas are welcome.
 
Rory Conaway
• Triad Wireless • CEO
4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040
602-426-0542
r...@triadwireless.net
www.triadwireless.net
 
"I led the league in go get 'em next time." -

Bob Uecker
 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 AC

[tyson]

 
There was 4 at one time.  The AC Lite, AC ptp, AC ptmp, and ac prism.  They may 
have stopped making one of these models though.
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 AC
From: "Kees H" 
Date: 12/23/16 12:39 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

   Are you saying there are only 3 RM5 AC models?
 
Lite
Airprism in upper
Airprism in all bands?
 
 
From: Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:36 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 AC


 

Spec sheet attached..
 
These units have airprism, but will not do lower 5ghz due to hardware/filter 
limitation.
 
 
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
 
  From: "Kees H." 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:01:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 AC 
   I was hoping UBNT would chime in on this one.  As I don't want to climb our 
130ft tower and put up the wrong AP.
As you can see from the attached picture, mine does not look like your 
description.  I suspect it is because this is an earlier (first) version.  This 
was from a spare.  But we have several that have been removed from ptp links.  
And I need a way to identify them from non prism RM5s.
 
 
From: Phil Curnutt
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 4:28 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 AC


 

Prisms are longer, more square edged, and in a metallic case (tap the case with 
your finger nail) as compared to all the other Rocket AC's.   Oh, and they say 
"PRISM" across the front and have a GPS port between the Antenna ports.  
Phil

 
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Kees H  wrote:
 Are you sure that Prisms are metal case only.  I know I ordered some 
Prisms, but we have only plastic case.
How can one identify between them?
 
 
From: Phil Curnutt
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 3:47 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 AC


 

There are: Rocket AC Lites:  All UNII bands, but not filters, plastic case.
Rocket AC PtP:  All UNII bands, but no filters, plastic case.  These were 
originally PtP only, but after some early   firmware update also could do 
PtMP.
Rocket AC PtMP:  No UNII-Lower band, no filters, plastic case, became both PtP 
and PtMP after above
   firmware upgrade.
Rocket AC Prism:  All UNII bands, filters all bands, metal case, both PtP and 
PtMP.
 
Phil

 
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Kees H  wrote:
  We used a mix of Lite and RM5 AC for PTP before AF5x.  So I have several 
units on the shelves.  Trying to figure out which ones are the prisms.

So all non Lites have Prisms?

 

 
 
 
No.  I remember an M5 AC Lite Rocket that i was considering getting but was 
told for the extra money the prism had noise filtering tech in it that was 
worth the money for performance gained.  Not an expert on AC stuff dont have 
any ptmp setups yet just ptps
- Original Message - Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 AC
From: "Kees H" 
Date: 12/22/16 4:29 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 


Are all RM5 AC prisms?
 
 
 
 



___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users





___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

 
 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users






___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

 
 

 ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 



___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 

 ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 


___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 AC

[tyson]

 
No.  I remember an M5 AC Lite Rocket that i was considering getting but was 
told for the extra money the prism had noise filtering tech in it that was 
worth the money for performance gained.  Not an expert on AC stuff dont have 
any ptmp setups yet just ptps
- Original Message - Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket M5 AC
From: "Kees H" 
Date: 12/22/16 4:29 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 


Are all RM5 AC prisms?
 
 
 
 



___ Ubnt_users mailing list 
Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Air Grid M2 to Rocket M2 lousy connection

[tyson]

Id suggest running a spectrum analyzer on the AP side find the cleanest 
channel.  Normally with lopsided rates and a good signal this fixes that kind 
of situation for me.  Ive never personally been a fan of the grids though.  I 
think they are not dual pol. so if that doesnt help swap the grid around. 
(havent used one in years this may have changed)
 
- Original Message - Subject: [Ubnt_users] Air Grid M2 to 
Rocket M2 lousy connection
From: "Jan Van Kort" 
Date: 11/10/16 12:34 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 

Got a Rocket M2 with 120sector array as an AP. Cannot seem to get an 
 Air Grid HP to connect properly. TX/RX will show 6.5Mbps/130Mbps, pings 
 will either timeout or give 50-500ms range. (have grid mounted with 
 wide part being horizontal and device with narrow part vertical, as per 
 user guide instructions.) Do I have 2 airgrids out of the box that are 
 defective, or do I need to rotate the arrays to get a good connection?
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] M5 Rocket XM to XW issue

[tyson]

 
We have had some quirky issues similar to what you are explaining.  It seems to 
have happened on both xw and xm radios.  We use pppoe as a form of 
authentication in the cpe and the client radio will stay connected to the ap 
but they stop passing traffic and drop their pppoe connection.  I still haven't 
found a real good solution, but luckily its 2 small sites and i threw ping 
watchdog on the rocket ap to a client pppoe ip address and made that customer 
aware of it so they don't unplug during a storm for example.  Not a great 
solution but its definitely better than hopping on every time to reboot the ap. 
- Original Message - Subject: [Ubnt_users] M5 Rocket XM to XW 
issue
From: t...@byhalia.net
Date: 9/26/16 8:36 am
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org

I have a M5 rocket on a AMO-5G13 omni that was running XM 5.6.4 and was
 running great. It just started to disconnect randomly and need a hard
 reboot to reconnect the client radios (Powerbeam-M5-400). A simple power
 cycle was all that was needed to get fully operational again. Happened
 twice this month, so I thought it needed updated. Since it was an older
 M5 I replaced it this weekend with a new M5, XW version 5.6.4.
 
 Also, I read on a UBNT forum about running the new XW CPE's on XW AP's as
 they worked better, but that is not what I am seeing. So now the AP and
 all the CPE's (Powerbeam-M5-400) are on the XW version 5.64 and I am
 seeing terrible signals only on my CPE's that are near the tower. The
 CPE's farther away are fine, but anything less than a mile is showing
 signals in the 80's and previously they were in the low 60's to 50's. 
 Some CPE's have perfect line of sight too.
 
 Not sure what is causing it and hope somebody knows. At this point I'm
 ready to deal with the reboots and put the old XM radio back up! Hope
 somebody has a fix and I was thinking of firmware, but scared to change
 too much until I troubleshoot more as I read horror stories on all the
 firmware changes.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Troy
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users