[Bug 1164016] Re: restore type-ahead find
Best workaround so far is to install nautilus 3.4 in 13.04: http://www.webupd8.org/2013/04/get-nautilus-34-features-back-in-ubuntu.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164016 Title: restore type-ahead find To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1164016/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1164016] Re: restore type-ahead find
I would say that this is a long way from Low Importance. As a desktop user I hit this bug dozens of times per day, and over time this is incredibly frustrating to the point of having installed several alternatives, and even considering dropping Unity/Gnome in favor of KDE (or something sane). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164016 Title: restore type-ahead find To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1164016/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879950] Re: pidgin not showing up
The fact that this bug is such a big problem, affects all Ubuntu pidgin users, and still isn't fixed, after almost a year, completely baffles me. No, I will not change to empathy because it's simply daunting from a functional perspective. If that was the intended underlying motivation to not fix this, it's just plain awkward. Since at the pace of things, this isn't going away any time soon (yey for quality control), I accept suggestions on a non-QT instant messenger that has a decent behavior on Ubuntu. Or perhaps some indication as to whether this happens on other distros, since a fresh change might be the way to go. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879950 Title: pidgin not showing up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/879950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled
After 4 years of bug, moved on to Thunderbird more than two years ago. Unsubscribing from this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 Title: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/275952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 751174] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free()
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751174 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/751174/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #562912 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562912 ** Changed in: evolution Importance: High => Unknown ** Changed in: evolution Status: Invalid => Unknown ** Changed in: evolution Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #546637 => GNOME Bug Tracker #562912 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 Title: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/275952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 819925] Re: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink
I can confirm that this fixes the problem. I'm not seeing anymore packets being transferred to userspace! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819925 Title: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/819925/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 819925] Re: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink
I've tested it, and it indeed the kernel you shared packets are not transferred over the netlink interface. I would just point out that you shared a 2.6.39, while oneiric is on 3.0 :). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819925 Title: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/819925/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 819925] Re: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink
** Attachment added: "Kernel configuration file, with the offending option activated." https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819925/+attachment/2249865/+files/config-3.0.0-7-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819925 Title: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/819925/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 819925] [NEW] iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink
Public bug reported: A new option present in Kernel 3.0 enables exporting all wifi packets on the iwlwifi driver through (generic) netlink, for debug purposes (an intel undisclosed svtool). This should not be enabled by default, as it forces all wifi packet to be delivered through netlink (causing a large amount of netlink operations, leading to cpu overhead, and battery overhead). The offending option is: CONFIG_IWLWIFI_DEVICE_SVTOOL=y This should be disabled in production systems, as it only matters for development/testing. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) Status: In Progress ** Tags: iwlwifi linux mac80211 oneiric wifi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819925 Title: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/819925/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 815847] Re: LightDM not loading/working (only blank screen) on Oneiric Alpha 2
Could it be the missing dependency as seen in Bug #816646 ? Try installing lightdm-gtk-greeter -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815847 Title: LightDM not loading/working (only blank screen) on Oneiric Alpha 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/815847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816809] Re: lightdm does not start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 816646 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816646 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 816646 new update in oneiric broke start-up -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816809 Title: lightdm does not start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/816809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816885] Re: Lightdm isn't staring after the update this morning
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 816646 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816646 To fix it just install lightdm-gtk-greeter on a console: sudo apt-get install lightdm-gtk-greeter ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 816646 new update in oneiric broke start-up -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816885 Title: Lightdm isn't staring after the update this morning To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/816885/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 751174] [NEW] compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Random compiz crashes with unity. E.g. Resizing a window with alt +middle-mouse-button. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: compiz-core 1:0.9.4git20110322-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Tue Apr 5 10:20:47 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Alpha amd64 (20110302) InstallationMedia_: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Alpha amd64 (20110302) ProcCmdline: compiz ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature_: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7f8a7fa678c3 :lock cmpxchg %esi,(%rbx) PC (0x7f8a7fa678c3) ok source "%esi" ok destination "(%rbx)" (0x7f8a381f) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! SegvReason: writing unknown VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: compiz StacktraceTop: free () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 g_value_unset () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-crash natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751174 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 751174] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free()
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751174 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled
After I deleted the Unread search folder and created it again, it worked. It seems that the unread status is back up. What changed was evolution-data-server to version 2.24.2-0ubuntu1. This is step in the right direction, although other criteria don't work. -- Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled
Just updated to proposed using the following packages: evolution 2.24.1.1-0ubuntu1 evolution-data-server 2.24.1.1-0ubuntu1 The problem still persists. Upstream also doesn't seem to be fixed, despite a tentative fix released. Is there a 2.24.2 update coming through the pipe ? -- Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled
In spite of being marked as fix release upstream, it has not been, it was a poor hack that doesn't actually work. So this bug is very much alive and annoying, making search folders both useless and annoying. ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled
I have a search folder called 'Unread' with a single rule: status if not read for all Local and Active Remote Folders. This doesn't work either. So I'm not sure to which use case you are referring, since nothing workings. -- Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled
I agree. It doesn't work at all. It just removes the messages when marked read. I have the following evolution packages: evolution 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 evolution-common2.24.1-0ubuntu2 evolution-data-server 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 evolution-data-server-common2.24.1-0ubuntu1 -- Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled
I'm running 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 and this is not fixed. This is not even released in upstream stable release. -- Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 192888] Re: firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:10 +, alecwh wrote: > So, how would an Ubuntu Hardy user upgrade Flash from 9 to 10 (in order > to fix this bug)? > > Can a tutorial/wiki be setup for this? > Just enable hardy-backports for multiverse. This line on your /etc/apt/sources.list should suffice: deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-backports restricted main multiverse universe -- firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 192888] Re: firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport
> Since beta 1, Flash 10 is compatible with PulseAudio > sans libflashsupport, as long as you set the correct PulseAudio device > as per bug #198453 (which should be considered mandatory for a proper > PulseAudio setup anyway). Yes! It works. I agree with Alexander, it should be present in the bug description. Conn, just one question. Along the way, the packages from https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/+archive , created by John Vivirito, that fix a couple of bugs in pulse audio (?). Are these still required as part of the fix ? Or just correctly configuring asoundrc ? Thanks! -- firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 192888] Re: firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport
4 months into the hardy releasy and six into this bug, and flash is still not working. I've seen some possible fixes in this bugreport, but no definitive solutions. I have seen many new users change back to Windows or to other distros because of this bug. Sorry guys, but this really needs fixing... IMHO it should be marked as *Critical*. It's sad to see newly converted users leaving linux and ubuntu because they can't see youtube. I don't really understand the status of the affected packages, since I see several fix released, but it's still not working. It would be great if someone could explain this, because it's a bit confusing (especially for someone trying to learn its ways around proper bug managing) But i have two questions from an average user's perspective: - Is there at least a recommended workaround for this ? If there is, it deserves front and center attention on the bug report and on the wiki at least (possibly also in the forums: "How to Fix your crashing Flash") - Is there any way to contribute to this ? Package testing ? Further bug information ? Anything to speed this up ? (I don't think Ubuntu can afford 4 more months of this, and we should all pitch in.) Thanks. -- firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin
Moving libflashsupport.so out of the way fixes my issues. Thanks a lot. The problem is that it is not easy to debug firefox, and apport is failing (invalid retrace). So it would it would be nice to have some understanding of how to provide useful backtraces, even if just to tell apart bugs. If not, then most of these bugs just look all the same. Open Flash => crash firefox... -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin
This is currently being followed up elsewhere also, I believe. See bug 212877. -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197898] Re: Website get rerouted to a Japanese version
Hi. Thanks for reporting this behavior, but this is a Google "feature" which detects the connecting IP address and redirects to the localization it thinks is best suited. Pressing the go to Google.com in English button fixes this. There is currently no way for the browser to hide you current IP address, unless some extensive privacy mechanisms are used, which are mostly not available in today's networks. You can try to user Tor, which is an onion router implementation. -- Website get rerouted to a Japanese version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212877] Re: [hardy] [regression] Firefox 3 Beta 5 SEGFAULTs constantly when switching flash pages
Is this the same as bug 213948 ? Looks quite similar... -- [hardy] [regression] Firefox 3 Beta 5 SEGFAULTs constantly when switching flash pages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212877 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin
I think we need to reopen this, since it is so easily reproducible. I don't see any debug symbols for firefox-3.0, what are the steps to get proper debug information for firefox+flashplugin ? ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin
I do not agree with closing this bug as invalid. The apport stack trace might not have yield the necessary results. But this is still a very important and annoying bug. I am prepared to provide more info than just the apport information. Please note that this has 7 duplicates, and possibly more, see bug 192070 and bug 196248. This is definitely not a random won't debug won't fix bug. What more is needed to debug this ? -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209516] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
Ok. So, since this is not reproducible anymore, and no full details are available to mark it as fixed release, I will mark it as invalid. Thanks for your time in reporting this bug, and please do not hesitate to report it again if you see a similar behavior in the future. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 213948 firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209516 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192070] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
bug 196248 also seems to be a duplicate. Maybe merge all of them together ? -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192070] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
This also looks like a duplicate of bug 213948 . There seem to be a lot of them. This also happens in epiphany, so it might be a xulrunner-1.9 bug ? As steps to reproduce in other bugs, I just put a URL that crashes firefox/epiphany every time. http://www.bwin.com seems to crash every time, since it's all flash. Just a matter of clicking or minimizing the browser window. -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209516] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 213948, so it is being marked as such, since it seems to be the bug that is gathering more subscribers (even though it is now the original bug with such information). Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find. -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209516 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin
** Tags added: epiphany firefox flashplugin-nonfree gecko -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209516] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 Any special reason to ignore this ? This has been seen in other reports. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 213948 firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209516 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin
Ok, my bad then. Maybe it's a feature. -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin
>From the bugs marked as duplicate: Steps to reproduce this bug 1. Go to http://www.bwin.com (for example) 2. Wait a few seconds or try to click on any flash button Also, i don't believe it's very friendly to mark the original bug reports as duplicates of your report, which is actually more recent. Shouldn't it be the other way around ? -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212883] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() - Flashplugin nonfree
** Visibility changed to: Public -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() - Flashplugin nonfree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148711] Re: SCSI HardDisk Not Detected on Toshiba RAID controller in Toshiba Qosmio G20 Laptop
I tried Alpha2 (http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/hardy/alpha2) and it properly recognized the hard drives, so it's working up to that point. It's not my laptop, so i cannot test a clean install on it. I say this because the feisty install also required some major tricking to boot once installed. On a side a note, nvidia driver never worked on feisty, my friend is stuck on nv or vesa. Not sure why, but i never managed to fix it for him... -- SCSI HardDisk Not Detected on Toshiba RAID controller in Toshiba Qosmio G20 Laptop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148711 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148711] Re: SCSI HardDisk Not Detected on Toshiba RAID controller in Toshiba Qosmio G20 Laptop
Also, this bug relates to bugs: Bug #139790 - Installed successfully (Gutsy Tribe 5) but failed to boot , Qosmio G20 (ata_piix problem) Bug #133892 - Failed to boot after upgrade edgy to fesity - Qosmio G20 (ata_piix problem) And is possibly a resurface of: Bug #26013 - Toshiba Qosmio G20 hard drive not detected -- SCSI HardDisk Not Detected on Toshiba RAID controller in Toshiba Qosmio G20 Laptop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148711 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148711] Re: SCSI HardDisk Not Detected on Toshiba RAID controller in Toshiba Qosmio G20 Laptop
Smacked against the same problem on the Qosmio G20. Gutsy Beta 1 will not recognize the hard drives out of the box. I managed to get it to recognize the hard drives as follows: Press F6 on the Grub menu while over the first menu option (Other Options): Append the following options to the boot line and then boot (Enter): blacklist=piix,ata_piix This enabled me to have the drives recognized properly. I'm moving on to the Install. If something goes wrong I'll check back. -- SCSI HardDisk Not Detected on Toshiba RAID controller in Toshiba Qosmio G20 Laptop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148711 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110151] Re: mplayer not compiled with nas audio support
mplayer (2:1.0~rc1-0ubuntu11) gutsy; urgency=low * Added Network Audio System (NAS) support (LP: #110151) -- Alfredo Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:53:04 +0100 ** Changed in: mplayer (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- mplayer not compiled with nas audio support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112188] Re: screen saver bug in dual-head setup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 96440 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96440 Thank you for your bug report. The behavior you mention is already described in Bug #96440 . Feel free to follow up the discussion on that bug. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 96440 Do not detect Mouse activity on Second screen while on Dual Desktop Configuration -- screen saver bug in dual-head setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112188 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119244] Re: Wake-up from suspend not working, Thinkpad z61m
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84991 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84991 Thank you for you bug report. There has been some activity regarding fglrx recovering from suspend. It's discussed on Bug #84991 . Feel free to try the mentioned setups or add more information if you don't manage to enable proper suspend/wake behavior. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 84991 Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX -- Wake-up from suspend not working, Thinkpad z61m https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119244 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79135] Re: gnome-power-manager and a problem with the brightness
I can see this bug also on a T60. But, gnome-power-manager adjusts the slider and the OSD through information received through hal, therefore this bug relates to HAL and ibm-acpi. HAL is capable of picking up the information supplied by gnome-power-manager, but does not pickup the correct level from ibm-acpi when the brightness changes. Digging deeper, when changing the brightness through the hotkeys, the ibm-acpi does not pickup the change in spite of the brightness changing, and therefore /proc/acpi/ibm/brightness level does not change. Since the ibm-acpi is part of the vanilla source, i would say that this is a linux-source-2.6.20 bug. ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: gnome-power-manager => linux-source-2.6.20 Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- gnome-power-manager and a problem with the brightness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89245] Re: brightness-applet does not move slider when hardware keys used
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 79135 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79135 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 79135 gnome-power-manager and a problem with the brightness -- brightness-applet does not move slider when hardware keys used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114950] Re: brightness applet doesn't show changing brightness levels
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 79135 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79135 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 79135 gnome-power-manager and a problem with the brightness -- brightness applet doesn't show changing brightness levels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 39614] Re: Mouse Pointer in kind of underlined.
Latest ATI driver releases properly fall back to 2D support when acceleration fails to load, without display artifacts. ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Mouse Pointer in kind of underlined. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39614 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110151] Re: mplayer not compiled with nas audio support
Sorry, did not refresh my browser before posting the new debdiff. Using bzr is a whole new ball game for me. Couldn't a maintainer pick up the debdiff and push into the mplayer bzr tree ? -- mplayer not compiled with nas audio support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110151] Re: mplayer not compiled with nas audio support
Added the debdiff between -ubuntu10 and -ubuntu11 versions of mplayer, as request. Built on a gusty machine and on a gutsy pbuilder chroot. ** Attachment added: "mplayer.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8021637/mplayer.debdiff -- mplayer not compiled with nas audio support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110151] Re: mplayer not compiled with nas audio support
This should be sufficient. Not much of an achievement, but i'm practicing my packaging skills and pbuilder cycles. Besides the enable flag, a new dependency on libaudio-dev is required. Check the attached debdiff. ** Attachment added: "debiff" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7639474/mplayer.debdiff -- mplayer not compiled with nas audio support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114057] Re: [apport] evolution-2.10 crashed with SIGSEGV in e_memchunk_free()
** Tags added: need-i386-retrace ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- [apport] evolution-2.10 crashed with SIGSEGV in e_memchunk_free() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114057 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops"
The linux-2.6.20-11 kernel release fixes the kvm problems. ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops" https://launchpad.net/bugs/92159 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops"
Added uname -a log, as requested in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelProblems ** Attachment added: "uname-a" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823973/uname-a.log ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops" https://launchpad.net/bugs/92159 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops"
Added lspci -vvnn log as requested in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelProblems ** Attachment added: "lspci-vvn" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823971/lspci-vvnn.log -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops" https://launchpad.net/bugs/92159 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92291] Re: modprobe kvm-intel fails
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 92159 *** Marked this bug as duplicate of Bug 92159 because it is in fact the same problem, since after a while kernel oops occur even though people may not notice it. -- modprobe kvm-intel fails https://launchpad.net/bugs/92291 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops"
Attached the Oops dmesg trace so we can cleanup the bug description. ** Attachment added: "dmesg-oops" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823929/dmesg-oops.txt ** Description changed: Binary package hint: kvm Hi, This on Core 2 Duo E6600, Asrock 775-VSTA, nvidia-glx and Atheros. Linux 2.6.20-10-generic #2 SMP Mon Mar 12 00:02:49 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux kvm | 16-1ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com feisty/universe Packages - First I tried to load kvm: - - + Modprobe of kvm-intel fails: + --- $ sudo modprobe kvm-intel Password: WARNING: Error inserting kvm (/lib/modules/2.6.20-10-generic/kernel/drivers/kvm/kvm.ko): Is a directory FATAL: Error inserting kvm_intel (/lib/modules/2.6.20-10-generic/kernel/drivers/kvm/kvm-intel.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) - - + --- - As suggested, I checked dmesg: - - - [ 151.446292] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol gfn_to_memslot - [ 151.446342] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol set_cr3 - [ 151.446411] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol segment_base - [ 151.446450] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_get_msr_common - [ 151.446494] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_mmu_free_some_pages - [ 151.446533] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol load_msrs - [ 151.446577] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_write_guest - [ 151.446616] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_exit_arch - [ 151.446655] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol emulate_instruction - [ 151.446700] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol fx_init - [ 151.446749] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol set_cr4 - [ 151.446797] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol lmsw - [ 151.446837] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_hypercall - [ 151.446898] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_init_arch - [ 151.446950] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol set_cr0 - [ 151.446988] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_stat - [ 151.447037] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol set_cr8 - [ 151.447076] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_read_guest - [ 151.447129] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_set_msr_common - [ 151.447177] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol save_msrs - [ 151.447217] kvm_intel: Unknown symbol kvm_resched - - + dmesg present Unknown symbols, check attached dmesg-modprobe. - Then after a while I got "oops" and a hard lockup (no key combos would work): - - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935743] Oops: [#1] - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935744] SMP - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935844] CPU:0 - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935845] EIP:0060:[get_filesystem_list+39/128] Tainted: P VLI - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935846] EFLAGS: 00010293 (2.6.20-10-generic #2) - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935853] EIP is at get_filesystem_list+0x27/0x80 - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935856] eax: 0012 ebx: f8d41180 ecx: 000b edx: 0012 - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935859] esi: 0117 edi: d9d5b000 ebp: esp: db4c7f10 - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935861] ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935864] Process groupmod (pid: 6493, ti=db4c6000 task=d9e66a90 task.ti=db4c6000) - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935866] Stack: d9d5b105 c0366b20 c0366bc3 f8ce740f db4c7f64 0c00 d9d5b000 c01aeae7 - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935874]db4c7f60 c01aeac0 0c00 d9d5b000 c01acf2f 0c00 db4c7f64 - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935881] 0fff 08057958 dfffc640 e25728c0 08057958 - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935888] Call Trace: - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935909] [filesystems_read_proc+39/96] filesystems_read_proc+0x27/0x60 - - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Mar 14 09:34:02 2007 ... - localhost kernel: [ 380.935917] [filesystems_read_proc+0/96] filesys
[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops"
Also attached a cpuinfo for information. ** Attachment added: "cpuinfo" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823723/cpuinfo.txt -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops" https://launchpad.net/bugs/92159 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops"
I can confirm this. modprobe kvm fails, kvm-intel fails, and a subsequent oops is bound to happen (and did). Attaching dmesg of the failed symbols ** Attachment added: "dmesg" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823721/dmesg.txt -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops" https://launchpad.net/bugs/92159 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92291] Re: modprobe kvm-intel fails
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 92159 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 92159 Cannot load kvm and subsequent "oops" -- modprobe kvm-intel fails https://launchpad.net/bugs/92291 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
Added these findings to http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Feisty_Installation_Guide and to the upstream bug report, so that users can find them, not just here. -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
** Description changed: Running Feisty with all updates and using latest xorg-fglrx-driver on an ATI X700 graphics card. Laptop will suspend via buttons on power manager or when closing the the laptop, however, it will not resume from suspend to ram. All I get is a black screen and only a hard reboot via power switch will bring it back. - Potential Fix (works for X1300 at least): - In /etc/default/acpi-support replace - POST_VIDEO=true - by - POST_VIDEO=false + FIX + + Successful sleep state is obtained by setting by modifying options in + /etc/default/acpi-support + + Options for ATI X700: + + SAVE_VBE_STATE=false + POST_VIDEO=true + USE_DPMS=false + + Options for ATI X1300: + + POST_VIDEO=false -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info => Fix Released -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87687] Re: New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty
After some code checking, the Xinerama stuff is already in the git package that John Dong put together. The patch fails to apply because it's already there. After some investigation along with John, Xinerama works !great!. There is an explicit need to +xinerama to the XGL startup script, but after that, working great. In my case the following does the trick: Xgl :1 -fullscreen -ac -accel xv:pbuffer -accel glx:pbuffer -nolisten tcp +xinerama & Having this fixed also, just gives me one more strong reason to support the UVF bypass for this package. Thanks J.Dong. -- New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/87687 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87687] Re: New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty
John Dong, i tried your package, it work great (and fast too). But you seem to have dropped the Xinerama stuff. Could this be why my windows (gnome-panel, splash, etc) are appearing between screens ? My dual monitors are like one big screen, with windows and panels spanning across both screens. Thanks. -- New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/87687 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87687] Re: New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty
What is the status of this ? Is the new package going to pass the UVF or not ? -- New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/87687 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90883] Re: Cannot turn off wireless
** Changed in: ipw2100 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Alfredo Matos => (unassigned) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed -- Cannot turn off wireless https://launchpad.net/bugs/90883 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90883] Re: Cannot turn off wireless
Filled Upstream: http://bughost.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1238 Feel free to comment on the upstream also, adding valuable information. Thanks. -- Cannot turn off wireless https://launchpad.net/bugs/90883 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90883] Re: Cannot turn off wireless
Can you post kernel version and ipw2100 driver version please ? To get the kernel version: uname -r For ipw2100 try: cat /var/log/message | grep 2100 | grep driver this should yield some information ** Changed in: ipw2100 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alfredo Matos Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- Cannot turn off wireless https://launchpad.net/bugs/90883 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90883] Re: Cannot turn off wireless
I can confirm this behavior on a ipw3945 also. But it seems that it's more a sysfs problem of the driver rather then permissions... -- Cannot turn off wireless https://launchpad.net/bugs/90883 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74908] Re: Thinkpad wireless hotkey won't work
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 90833 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 90833 Some spelling errors -- Thinkpad wireless hotkey won't work https://launchpad.net/bugs/74908 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89141] Re: fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Assignee: Alfredo Matos => (unassigned) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed -- fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60 https://launchpad.net/bugs/89141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
Ok thanks. Could their be a note on that on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess ? Because I tried to follow the process and add the motu-uvf as explained... -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
Is it necessary to have packages handy and ready for upload even for binary packages that affect the restricted-modules ? -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
** Attachment added: "Attached a diffstat from ATI provided install packages." http://librarian.launchpad.net/6722145/diffstat.txt -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90961] UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
Public bug reported: Upstream release contains fixes that solve reported suspend failures on some devices (ex. ATI X700, See Bug #84991), and supports more ATI hardware Release notes contain: - introduces support for the ATI Xpress™ 1250 IGP for AMD based motherboards - A system hang no longer occurs when attempting to resume from hibernation mode. Further details can be found in topic number 737-22059 - Loading the XVideo Extension on 64-bit Xorg 6.9+ systems no longer results in the X Server segfaulting when launching. This issue was known to occur with Radeon X1K products. Further details and the workaround can be found in topic number 737-22837 - Running aticonfig--dtop=(horizontal|vertical) no longer results in clone mode being activated when attempting to enable big desktop mode ** Affects: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: MOTU UVF Team Status: Unconfirmed -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
We should probably open a UVF Exception. -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU UVF Team -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
Submited an UVF Exception see Bug #90961 Feel free to edit/add/comment on it. -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89141] Re: fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60
Could you post your package version from gnome-power-manager ? You can get in a terminal or in synaptic (terminal follows): dpkg -l | grep gnome-power-manager ** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: acpi-support => gnome-power-manager -- fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60 https://launchpad.net/bugs/89141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90591] Re: UVF: gimmie 0.2.1 -> 0.2.4
+1. I was hit by: * Fix bug with missing .gtk-bookmarks file Now i'm with: * Fix crash opening People pane (bug #404909) Hope this bypasses the freeze... -- UVF: gimmie 0.2.1 -> 0.2.4 https://launchpad.net/bugs/90591 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
Nice catch. If that doesn't work, i can only assume that it is X700 specific. I would recommend that you take the following steps: 1. Try the new driver release 8.34.8 and see if it works. You can find information on how to install here: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Feisty_Installation_Guide 2. If nothing works, file an issue on the ATI Customer Care as already shown on this thread, or even on the unofficial bug report database http://ati.cchtml.com/ Other than this, we should probably close this bug, since it is a binary driver and cannot be fixed in Ubuntu. -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89141] Re: fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60
There isn't any attachment on the bug report, could you directly upload it here on launchpad ? Did you manage to put the laptop to sleep using Fn+F4 and the sleep.sh script ? It would be nice to get everything going through g-p-m, since it is already working here, and for most people. But we can cease and desist if this works for you and nobody else complains... -- fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60 https://launchpad.net/bugs/89141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
$ gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbose &> g-p-m.log (had a typo) -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbose > g-p-m.log Well, guess g-p-m uses stderr: Try instead: $ gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbos &> g-p-m.log After having g-p-m running, suspend the laptop. Then check the file for errors. If you need to paste the entire log file, please use the attachment tool. -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
Can you check what's going on in gnome-power-manager ? killall -9 gnome-power-manager gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbose > g-p-m.log And then please report back with what is going on. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Needs Info -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
** Description changed: Running Feisty with all updates and using latest xorg-fglrx-driver on an ATI X700 graphics card. Laptop will suspend via buttons on power manager or when closing the the laptop, however, it will not resume from suspend to ram. All I get is a black screen and only a hard reboot via power switch will bring it back. - Fix: + Potential Fix (works for X1300 at least): In /etc/default/acpi-support replace POST_VIDEO=true by POST_VIDEO=false -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
** Description changed: Running Feisty with all updates and using latest xorg-fglrx-driver on an ATI X700 graphics card. Laptop will suspend via buttons on power manager or when closing the the laptop, however, it will not resume from suspend to ram. All I get is a black screen and only a hard reboot via power switch will bring it back. + + Fix: + In /etc/default/acpi-support replace + POST_VIDEO=true + by + POST_VIDEO=false -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX
Could you try editing the following file, and the mentioned changes: /etc/default/acpi-support POST_VIDEO=true to POST_VIDEO=false And then test if it works ? -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving
s/clause/closed -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving
Feisty is to supported by the ATI installer yet. Only the following: Ubuntu Packages: Ubuntu/warty Ubuntu/4.10 Ubuntu/hoary Ubuntu/5.04 Ubuntu/breezy Ubuntu/5.10 Ubuntu/dapper Ubuntu/6.06 Ubuntu/edgy Ubuntu/6.10 I'm beginning to think that this bug should be clause in favor of a new spec (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+specs). -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89141] Re: fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60
Works fine here on a T60, through g-p-m and Fn+F4: [Sun Mar 4 23:56:05 2007] received event "ibm/hotkey HKEY 0080 1004" [Sun Mar 4 23:56:05 2007] notifying client 5163[107:112] [Sun Mar 4 23:56:05 2007] notifying client 4991[0:0] [Sun Mar 4 23:56:05 2007] executing action "/etc/acpi/sleepbtn.sh" [Sun Mar 4 23:56:05 2007] BEGIN HANDLER MESSAGES [Sun Mar 4 23:56:05 2007] END HANDLER MESSAGES [Sun Mar 4 23:56:05 2007] action exited with status 0 [Sun Mar 4 23:56:05 2007] completed event "ibm/hotkey HKEY 0080 1004" Could you try getting more info from g-p-m ? Do the following: killall -9 gnome-power-manager and the run gnome-power-manager --verbose --no-daemon And compare the outputs, and paste here any relevant findings ** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alfredo Matos Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60 https://launchpad.net/bugs/89141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving
After a few hours messing about with xorg-driver-fglrx, linux- restricted-modules and the ATI driver installer, I don't see that the package tries to pack the files in question. But I also missed to see that being done in Edgy packages. One question, did you by any chance install the driver in Edgy manually using the ATI installer? -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving
Requires further info to determine if this is a wishlist item or a bug. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving
Were those files present on Edgy ? -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving
** Tags added: ati fglrx laptop -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving
I can confirm this. Both files are missing. /etc/acpi/fglrx-powermode.sh /etc/default/fglrx And while on Battery I'm in default state, not powersave: core/mem [flags] - 1: 128/135 MHz [low voltage] 2: 324/135 MHz * 3: 392/324 MHz [default state] -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84766] Re: F-spot (not gthumb) should be used to import photos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 80856 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 80856 F-Spot as default for importing photos -- F-spot (not gthumb) should be used to import photos https://launchpad.net/bugs/84766 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
