Re: [Bug 252418] Re: gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: Please, reply to Luca's question. Sorry, I forgot about this bug. I'll have to retake a look, but that won't happen before Tuesday (have some other stuff to do). -- gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413164] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor mozilla-livehttpheaders 0.15-0ubuntu1
Public bug reported:
Hello,
Upstream released new release 0.15 which is officially compatible with
Firefox 3.5.
The packaging is also updated. Here are the changelog entries:
* Add .bzr-builddeb/default.conf
* Use med-xpi-pack from mozilla-devscripts package
- remove debian/med-xpi-pack
- remove MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND from debian/rules
- Build-Depend on mozilla-devscripts (= 0.10), since we didn't have
med-xpi-pack in previous versions
- remove zip from Build-Depends, since it was needed for debian/med-xpi-pack
* Remove alternate dependencies firefox-3.0 | firefox-2, they are not present
in karmic
* Add alternate dependency to abrowser
* Update Maintainer field in debian/control, as per DebianMaintainerField
specification
* Update Vcs-{Browser,Bzr} fields in debian/control
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.2
* Upstream doesn't incorrectly ship files as executables, remove chmod lines
in debian/rules
* Update path to GPL2 in debian/copyright to make Lintian happy
** Affects: livehttpheaders (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor mozilla-livehttpheaders 0.15-0ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413164
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411740] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu2
** Summary changed: - REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu1 + REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu2 ** Description changed: Hello, I've prepared an update for nspluginwrapper, which includes new upstream release 1.3.0. This is a development version, but it is already in Debian unstable repository. I have tested it a bit, and it behaves nicely. I will also push it to my PPA [1], so a reviewer can easily test it. I also updated a few patches, as mentioned in the changelog, and added one from Debian package. I didn't prepare a merge, since we're way over Debian import freeze. - Here are changelog entries, which describe the work on this version: + Here are changelog entries, which describe the work on 1.3.0-0ubuntu1: * Update Maintainer field in debian/control, as proposed by DebianMaintainerField spec * Update debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff - change short option for nosymlinks from n to x to avoid collision with option native - add option nosymlinks to print_usage() * Update debian/patches/003_update_help_info.diff because of change in debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff * Update debian/patches/use_syslsb.patch because of different Makefile * Add patch debian/patches/004_system_only_update.diff from Debian version 1.2.2-1 * Refresh patches + Changelog entries for 1.3.0-0ubuntu2: + * Add debian/patches/000_allow_empty_short_option.diff to allow no short option for some parameter (patch by Alexander Sack a...@ubuntu.com). + * Increment indices in the name of all previous patches. + * Refresh patches. + * Remove short option x for nosymlinks option in debian/patches/001_debian_make_symlinks.diff + + The prepared update is located in the linked branch. [1] https://edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/+archive/ppa -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413164] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor mozilla-livehttpheaders 0.15-0ubuntu1
** Branch linked: lp:~jazzva/firefox-extensions/mozilla- livehttpheaders-0.15 -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor mozilla-livehttpheaders 0.15-0ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413164 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411740] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu1
Public bug reported: Hello, I've prepared an update for nspluginwrapper, which includes new upstream release 1.3.0. This is a development version, but it is already in Debian unstable repository. I have tested it a bit, and it behaves nicely. I will also push it to my PPA [1], so a reviewer can easily test it. I also updated a few patches, as mentioned in the changelog, and added one from Debian package. I didn't prepare a merge, since we're way over Debian import freeze. Here are changelog entries, which describe the work on this version: * Update Maintainer field in debian/control, as proposed by DebianMaintainerField spec * Update debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff - change short option for nosymlinks from n to x to avoid collision with option native - add option nosymlinks to print_usage() * Update debian/patches/003_update_help_info.diff because of change in debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff * Update debian/patches/use_syslsb.patch because of different Makefile * Add patch debian/patches/004_system_only_update.diff from Debian version 1.2.2-1 * Refresh patches The prepared update is located in the linked branch. [1] https://edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/+archive/ppa ** Affects: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411740] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu1
** Branch linked: lp:~jazzva/nspluginwrapper/1.3.0 -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 306836]
Hello Andrea, On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Andrea Veri wrote: you should also update maintainer field with this mail: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com not the old one as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField Thanks, I didn't know about new DebianMaintainerField spec. I updated that and bumped Standards-Version to 3.8.2. I can add misc:Depends, but I don't think it's needed in this package. As for the extra-license-file, I think it's not a big issue. If you want, I can fix it, but I would need your help to tell me how to remove it from the package. New revisions are located in the linked branch. If you ask me, I would say it's ready for the upload. Thanks for your sponsorship. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
Hello Andrea, I just noticed that I have forgot to change target from UNRELEASED to karmic in debian/changelog. I pushed a new revision with just that change. Should I bump version to -0ubuntu2 instead? Or will it be OK with UNRELEASED (e.g. archive administrators will fix that)? Sorry for this. ** Changed in: firefox-extensions Status: Fix Committed = In Progress -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
Hello Andrea, On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Andrea Veri wrote: ok, just let me know when you have a working package ready and I'll take a look at it. It's ready, you can get it from the linked branch and run bzr builddeb. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
Hello Andrea, On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Andrea Veri wrote: you said me the current version doesnt work. Did upstream already fixed the issue you were talking about? Yes, I received response from him few hours ago that he fixed the problem, and uploaded the new version to addons.mozilla.org. ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
Hello Andrea, Sorry for the delay (been pretty busy in the past few months). The new version (1.6) is detected in Thunderbird 2.0.0.22, but it's not really showing up in bug mails. Could you (or someone other) test (building with bzr builddeb) the current revision in the linked branch before uploading, because I would like to be sure that it's not just my configuration that is causing the extension to not work, before reporting this upstream. Thanks. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete = In Progress -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
Saša Bodiroža wrote: The new version (1.6) is detected in Thunderbird 2.0.0.22, but it's not really showing up in bug mails. I have found the bug, and will e-mail upstream developer. With version 1.5, I can see the box with bug data, but it's collapsed (so, that's still not usable). -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
Hello Andrea, Just give me a day or two to update the branch. I have checked now, and version 1.5, which is available on addons.mozilla.org, contains a license file. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 379847] Re: [needs-packaging] long-url-please
Hello Nathan, Changelog version is still 0.1-0ubuntu1, I suppose it should be 0.4.1-0ubuntu1. Also, please fix mozilla to Mozilla in description field. After those minor changes are pushed, feel free to upload the package. Thanks for packaging it. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [needs-packaging] long-url-please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 355725] Re: firefox-greasemonkey should be upgraded to 0.8.20090123.1
Looks good to me. Alexander said that we should remove firefox- prefix, so you're free to do that in binary package name and provide a dummy package. -- firefox-greasemonkey should be upgraded to 0.8.20090123.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345606] Re: list_plugin() doesn't take NSPLUGINDIRS in consideration
** Description changed: Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper The current implementation doesn't take in consideration wrappers which are installed in directory specified with NSPLUGIN_DIR environment variable. This is needed in order to be able to update all wrappers in nspluginwrapper's postinst script. This would be done by plugin packages providing a meta-file in /var/lib/nspluginwrapper/dirs.d/. For example, flashplugin-nonfree would provide /var/lib/nspluginwrapper/dirs.d/flashplugin-nonfree which would contain its NSPLUGIN_DIR. - list_plugin() would read files in that directory, and see if any - directory specified in a file contains a wrapper. If there is a wrapper, - then it would be listed. The output of nspluginwrapper -l would be - provided to nspluginwrapper -u which would then update the plugins. + update-wrapper script would read those files and form an env variable + NSPLUGIN_DIRS which would contain a list of directories separated by : + character. (update-wrapper will be tracked by another bug report, the + specificaction for that script is still being discussed) + + get_env_plugin_dirs() would split the list in NSPLUGIN_DIRS, and return + it. get_mozilla_plugin_dirs() would append the split list to the end of + the current list of default directories. ** Branch linked: lp:~jazzva/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu.1.2.2-0ubuntu3 ** Summary changed: - list_plugin() doesn't take NSPLUGINDIRS in consideration + nspluginwrapper doesn't take NSPLUGIN_DIRS in consideration -- nspluginwrapper doesn't take NSPLUGIN_DIRS in consideration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set
I have pushed a new revision that contains the fix for this bug. It will not install wrappers to default dirs if NSPLUGIN_DIR environment variable is specified. Alexander, I'll open a new bug for implementation of list_plugins which take those nspluginwrapper's meta-files in consideration. ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Jaunty) Status: New = Invalid -- nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345606] [NEW] list_plugin() doesn't take NSPLUGINDIRS in consideration
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper The current implementation doesn't take in consideration wrappers which are installed in directory specified with NSPLUGIN_DIR environment variable. This is needed in order to be able to update all wrappers in nspluginwrapper's postinst script. This would be done by plugin packages providing a meta-file in /var/lib/nspluginwrapper/dirs.d/. For example, flashplugin-nonfree would provide /var/lib/nspluginwrapper/dirs.d/flashplugin-nonfree which would contain its NSPLUGIN_DIR. list_plugin() would read files in that directory, and see if any directory specified in a file contains a wrapper. If there is a wrapper, then it would be listed. The output of nspluginwrapper -l would be provided to nspluginwrapper -u which would then update the plugins. ** Affects: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: New = Confirmed -- list_plugin() doesn't take NSPLUGINDIRS in consideration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set
I pushed it to the branch linked to this bug report [1]. If I understood correctly, beta freeze applies only to the packages in main and restricted. nspluginwrapper is in multiverse. [1] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu.1.2.2-0ubuntu2 -- nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set
I attached the branch that contains partial fix for this bug. I removed the Iceweasel dir from debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff and it doesn't create links /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins anymore. ** Also affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set
Also, it seems this bug is located in flashplugin-nonfree's prerm script. nspluginwrapper is called in its postinst script and the wrapper is installed. The call to nspluginwrapper to uninstall the wrapper is missing in flashplugin-nonfree's prerm script. I added the f-n task to the bug report. -- nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set
There is a part in debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff which is used to install these default symlinks. We can remove it and just use NSPLUGIN_DIR env var, or keep it and add nspluginwrapper -r call in flashplugin-nonfree's prerm script. Alexander, if I understood correctly, we don't need the default symlinks. If that's correct, I think we can safely drop that part. -- nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321814] Re: nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set
I'll fix it later tonight, or tomorrow if that's not too late. Sorry for the delay, I was supposed to fix it in the first place. ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu Jaunty) Assignee: Alexander Sack (asac) = Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) -- nspluginwrapper creates default links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 205218] Re: [unmet dependencies] glife requires libglade-gnome0, but that doesn't exists
Hello philps, On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:36 PM, philps wrote: - a few things concerning the packaging: - glife (0.2.1-1build2) intrepid - glife (0.2.1-1ubuntu1) jaunty Does this mean you want me to rename the package to 0.2.1-1ubuntu1 for jaunty? I suppose he meant that you should change version in debian/changelog from 0.2.1-1build2 to 0.2.1-1ubuntu1, and targeted release from intrepid to jaunty. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [unmet dependencies] glife requires libglade-gnome0, but that doesn't exists https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 316305] Re: please sync deluge/1.1.2.dfsg-1 from debian-experimental
Hello André, On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:18 PM, André Gondim wrote: I just want do know why we sync from debian this 1.1.2 version. Why we just not mantaner? Because that's the way it is done. There is no need to do the same thing twice (packaging work). We regularly sync/merge packages from Debian, so in this way we minimize the diff between our and Debian's version. It is possible afterwards to update the package to 1.1.4, until Feature freeze (which is on February 19th, if I remember correctly). So, the main point is that we tend not to differ a lot, if we really don't need to. I hope this answer clarifies the situation a bit. Here are some possibly useful links: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/ReleaseProcess https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#SyncingAndMerging -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- please sync deluge/1.1.2.dfsg-1 from debian-experimental https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316305 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 316305] please sync only from debian
Hello Cristian, On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Cristian Greco wrote: Who is the actual maintainer for Ubuntu? Why don't you wait for sync with Debian instead of forking packaging work? That's what I said few posts before, and that's the way we should do this. I'm really interested in cooperating with the actual maintainer. We don't have an actual maintainer for the package, and everyone can work on it (provide new upstream versions, preparing syncs/merges from Debian, preparing patches). But it is possible that one person is doing the most of the work on some package. You can check the changelog [1]. It seems that in past Deluge has been directly synced from Debian with no changes to the packaging. If no one files a sync request I'll do it myself later. Actually, this bug report can be just modified so it states that we should sync 1.1.2 from Debian. [1] http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/d/deluge/deluge_1.0.7.dfsg-3/changelog -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- Please upgrade deluge to version 1.1.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316305 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 323409] Re: sasl2-bin broken, segfaulting during install
Same here... Jaunty 32bit -- sasl2-bin broken, segfaulting during install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 323409] Re: sasl2-bin broken, segfaulting during install
Same here... Jaunty 32bit -- sasl2-bin broken, segfaulting during install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316305] Re: please sync to deluge 1.1.0
Take a look at bug #275375 [1]. I can see from the changelog that this package isn't based on the one from Debian. We are trying to not diverge a lot, if that isn't needed. Maybe it would be good if the version from Debian gets synced first, and then upgraded to 1.1.0 in Ubuntu. I'm not sure if it's ok to do it in one upload (one diff file for both tasks), but it might be. It would be good to ask someone else for opinion before working on 1.1.0 upgrade. [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deluge- torrent/+bug/275375 -- please sync to deluge 1.1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316305 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 311817] Re: External microphone jack not working on Dell Inspiron 1525
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Daniel T Chen wrote: Sorry, I reread the docs. You need to set your 'Input Source's to 'Front Mic' to use the _external mic jack_. 'Digital Input Source' needs to be set to 'Analog Inputs'. That is exactly how I tested if the external mic works with all three patches. For the first patch it worked, but it also started fading out the sound when headphones are plugged in (as we discussed on IRC). -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- External microphone jack not working on Dell Inspiron 1525 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311817] [NEW] External microphone jack not working on Dell Inspiron 1525
Public bug reported: Hello, I'm currently running Jaunty on Dell Inspiron 1525 and the external microphone jack is not working. I also used Intrepid on this laptop, and it didn't work there too. Here is the output of alsa-info.sh: http://www.alsa- project.org/db/?f=2133fc2a82c8209b27fb78e45b23e37dab3dc8a8 If there's anything else I need to submit, please ask and I'll do so. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- External microphone jack not working on Dell Inspiron 1525 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 309335] Re: .bzr-builddeb/default.conf doesnt export-upstream in some cases
Hello James, Here is the output for both cases. s...@cakana:~/Devel/bugmail/bugmail.ubuntu$ bzr bd Building using working tree Preparing the build area: ../build-area Looking for ../bugmail-extension_1.3.orig.tar.gz to use as upstream source For compatibility looking for ../tarballs/bugmail-extension_1.3.orig.tar.gz to use as upstream source There is no debian/watch file, so can't use that to retrieve upstream tarball bzr: ERROR: A Debian packaging error occurred: Could not find upstream tarball at ../bugmail-extension_1.3.orig.tar.gz s...@cakana:~/Devel/bugmail/bugmail.ubuntu$ bzr bd --merge --export-upstream=. --export-upstream-revision=revid:jaz...@gmail.com-20081210110900-3ia3rnb68n44qrsr Building using working tree Running in merge mode Preparing the build area: ../build-area Exporting to ../build-area/bugmail-extension-1.3 in merge mode Exporting upstream source from ., revision jaz...@gmail.com-20081210110900-3ia3rnb68n44qrsr bugmail-extension-1.3 Exporting debian/ part to ../build-area/bugmail-extension-1.3 Building the package in ../build-area/bugmail-extension-1.3, using dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot ... -- Saša -- .bzr-builddeb/default.conf doesnt export-upstream in some cases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306229] Re: [Jaunty] Please remove all iceweasel packages
Hello, Scrapbook is provided by scrapbook package. iceweasel-scrapbook is a transitional package that depends on it. It was merged from Debian, which uses iceweasel-scrapbook as the package name. -- [Jaunty] Please remove all iceweasel packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
Alexander Sack wrote: Was the licensing ok? - Alexander Yep, GPL. It was confirmed by mail. I'll ask him to provide a license fail for the next upload, if that's ok. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306836] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
Public bug reported: Hello, Please review and sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird. This extension adds bug status to the header pane. It currently supports Bugzilla, Trac, Flyspray and Launchpad. It is licensed under GPL v3. ** Affects: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
** Also affects: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Assignee: (unassigned) = Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: New = In Progress -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306836] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird
** Changed in: firefox-extensions Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: firefox-extensions Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 243466] Re: [needs-packaging] Chatzilla
Hello, On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Pander wrote: See screenshot to what kind of icons I'm referring to. Probably its more a generic Mozilla addon packaging checklist item. Some people tell me that I need help, some people can fuck off and go to hell. -- Cypress Hill ** Attachment added: screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20320651/screenshot.png I think that should be set in the extension itself, so the upstream should be contacted about this. It's not done in the packaging. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [needs-packaging] Chatzilla https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 227945] Re: [needs packaging] Please package FireGPG extension for Firefox
Hello Lionel, On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:11:45AM -, John Vivirito wrote: On 12/08/2008 09:21 AM, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote: Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 01:56:01, John Vivirito a écrit : Added Ubuntu task and assigned asac to review and push as needed There is already iceweasel-firegpg in unstable/main and jaunty/universe. Isn't it a better idea to merge it instead of repackaging it from scratch? We dont use iceweasel we use abrowser. We shouldnt have to fix each of Where did I say that we use iceweasel? the iceweasel packages to support other browsers since at this time it only depends on iceweasel and the packages are not updated but ours are. Right, I understand (this looks like duplicate work though). Then you may want to drop from the archive several iceweasel-* packages that landed in jaunty. We dont merge any mozilla apps from debian and we havee it so they get our packages. it == firegpg? they == debian? Why would Debian get our firegpg package? I see your point, but we (Mozilla team) are currently using scripts provided by mozilla-devscripts package for extensions packaging, in particular xpi.mk and med-xpi-pack, to make the process easier to the packager. The package is not available in Debian, and we are working on the solution to include some part of that package in Debian too. Until that happens, our and Debian's way of extension packaging heavily differs, so it is not possible to reuse their packaging. Also, asac and Volans are working on set of scripts which would automatically check for newer versions of all our extensions and try to auto-update packages. That is why we are maintaining packaging in bzr branches. I'm not sure whether that will be included in Debian. We are doing all of this in order to try to bring more extensions into the archive, and to be able to give regularly updated extensions to the user. So, for now, some of the extensions are merged, those on which we haven't worked on. In case firegpg has relatively newer version in Debian, we could use that package, but I think it will be adapted at some point to make use of scripts in mozilla-devscripts and auto-update scripts. I agree that diverge from Debian's packaging and double work are not good in case they're not needed, but I think it's not the case here. I hope that we will be able to include some of our work in Debian, making the merging process a lot easier, at least with Debian using mozilla-devscripts for extensions. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [needs packaging] Please package FireGPG extension for Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303974] Re: [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8
** Description changed: - SVN trunk represents nspluginwrapper 1.1.8 with the following changes: + The current revision 52 in the linked branch contains code from SVN + revision 805, which is tagged as 1.1.10 in revision 806. - * Delay NPN_ReleaseObject() if there is incoming RPC - * Improve plugins restart machinery (Martin Stransky) - * Close npviewer.bin sockets on exec() - * Close all open files on fork() (initial patch by Dan Walsh) - * Make `which` failures silent for soundwrappers (Stanislav Brabec) + Changes from 1.1.8 to 1.1.10: + * Fix NPPVpluginScriptableNPObject::Invalidate() + * Fix condition for delayed NPN_ReleaseObject() call + * Fix XEMBED (rework for lost events/focus regressions) + * Fix RPC for calls initiated by the plugin (SYNC mode) + * Fix invalid RPC after the plugin was NPP_Destroy()'ed + + Note, because of the RPC changes, it's mandatory to re-wrap your + plugins. Please update the package in jaunty -- [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303974] Re: [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8
** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184882] Re: Dependencies correct but Synaptic does not warn of incompatability
Hello, Is this bug still valid? According to Stumbleupon extension, it should be compatible with Firefox 1.0 up to 3.0.*. ** Changed in: mozilla-stumbleupon (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Incomplete -- Dependencies correct but Synaptic does not warn of incompatability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184882 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303974] [NEW] [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8
Public bug reported: SVN trunk represents nspluginwrapper 1.1.8 with the following changes: * Delay NPN_ReleaseObject() if there is incoming RPC * Improve plugins restart machinery (Martin Stransky) * Close npviewer.bin sockets on exec() * Close all open files on fork() (initial patch by Dan Walsh) * Make `which` failures silent for soundwrappers (Stanislav Brabec) Please update the package in jaunty ** Affects: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: New = In Progress -- [jaunty] Please update nspluginwrapper to 1.1.8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 303628] [NEW] Please update gnome-voice-control package to version 0.3+SVN
As far as I know, it is not possible to update to 0.3, until pocketsphinx and sphinxbase get to the repositories. David Huggins-Daines prepared the packages few months ago, and I tried to help him to get advocates for it, but we had no luck in getting them in. I contacted people on #cmusphinx on Freenode and they said it is not possible to compile g-v-c 0.3 with sphinx, meaning this task is blocked by pocketsphinx and sphinxbase. -- Please update gnome-voice-control package to version 0.3+SVN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 297169] Re: mozvoikko depends on iceweasel, should depend on firefox
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Heikki Mäntysaari wrote: And yes I also have a branch which I use to store my packaging. If you use a branch to maintain your packaging, you should mention it in debian/control, like in the template [1]. If you're not familiar with the branch naming, take a look at the extension packaging wiki page [2]. This is not necessary for the current upload. I haven't seen any document telling who should I request to sponsor this kind of patch (mozillateam or universe sponsors?) I think you should subscribe universe sponsors. AFAIK, there is no rule that Mozilla team is sponsor for Mozilla-related uploads. The debdiff has an ack from Mozilla team. If you can, please mention in the changelog that it optionally depends on abrowser. Thanks. [1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox-extensions/XPI.TEMPLATE/annotate/13?file_id=control-20080221120129-aifetlupiq8reqgv-4 [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/Packaging#Packaging%20Procedure -- mozvoikko depends on iceweasel, should depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184882] Re: Dependencies correct but Synaptic does not warn of incompatability
** Changed in: mozilla-stumbleupon (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) Status: New = In Progress -- Dependencies correct but Synaptic does not warn of incompatability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184882 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
The process should be the same as for the other uploads. Subscribe u-u-s and someone should upload it. I think the process doesn't require a debdiff, as it's maintained in a bzr branch and afaik MOTU should handle that too. It has an ack from Mozilla Extensions team. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297169] Re: mozvoikko depends on iceweasel, should depend on firefox
Hello, As of intrepid, there is package abrowser, which provides unbranded Firefox. Please add an optional dependency for it. It should be like abrowser (= 3) | firefox (= 3). Thank you for your contribution. -- mozvoikko depends on iceweasel, should depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)
Looks good to me. Could you just add (LP: #297708) to the new upstream item in the changelog? I think it's ready for the archive after that. Thanks. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar
Hello, Following the link in copyright file, I see that the source is obtained as xpi file. You could use med-xpi-unpack and med-xpi-pack scripts provided by mozilla-devscripts package. It would require a slight change to debian/rules. First you prepare the source tree using med-xpi-unpack, by calling it with something like this: ~$ med-xpi-unpack aios.xpi aios Previous command assumes that the name of xpi file is aios.xpi, and that it's located in your home dir. That will unpack the contents of xpi file to aios directory. Then copy over your debian/ directory to it. Replace the MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND to med-xpi-pack . aios.xpi Add mozilla-devscripts package to the list of build-dependencies in debian/control. Try to build the package, everything should work. Thank you for your contribution. -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 153777] Re: Firefox becomes inactive While Watching Videos
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Daniel T Chen wrote: Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10? I can't reproduce it anymore... Using flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.12.36ubuntu1. -- Firefox becomes inactive While Watching Videos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 290014] Re: clamdrib needs-packaging
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: I like that idea. howveer, we should then rename the page from firefox3extensions to mozillaextensions ;) i guess. It's already redirecting to w.u.c/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List. I think that is generic enought and can include TB extensions, and later SeaMonkey, Songbird, ... extensions. We can continue this on #ubuntu-mozillateam if there's a need, since it's a bit off topic on this bug report :). -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- clamdrib needs-packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290014 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 95670] Re: [needs-packaging] Jabbin
Hello, On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:43 PM, oss_test_launchpad wrote: Saša, we are still waiting for you to contact the launchpad admins and have the address removed. You produced this mess, so tidy it up. No change on this issue so far. I posted a question [1] on Launchpad answer tracker and one of the members of the Launchpad development said that it is not possible. Sorry for the mess, but I'm not sure if I can do anything else right now. [1] https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/37825 -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- [needs-packaging] Jabbin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 290014] Re: clamdrib needs-packaging
Sure thing. I'll add the extension to the list and contact upstream. I'm not sure if we need a special table for Thunderbird, since some of the extensions work both with FF and TB. Maybe we could add icons next to the name, which should represent the programs they are compatible with. I think there was a suggestion to do that before. That would be a nice thing. -- clamdrib needs-packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290014 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95670] Re: [needs-packaging] Jabbin
Hello, I have asked on #launchpad IRC channel and I got the answer that it would be the best if you contact them (via mail, answer tracker on Launchpad I guess). I have tried to help you as much as I can. I'm sorry that this problem occurred in the first place. -- [needs-packaging] Jabbin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285321] Re: [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (= 2.0.0.3-1) but it is not installable
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Siegfried-Angel wrote: But that debdiff wasn't uploaded, so as the version currently in Intrepid only depends on Iceweasel it doesn't make sense to list Removed Firefox 2 dependency from the changelog. Right, sorry. I skipped that detail. Everything is ok with this debdiff then [1]. fabrice_sp, sorry for the unneeded additional work. [1] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18756491/itsalltext_0.8.5-1ubuntu1-version2.debdiff -- [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (= 2.0.0.3-1) but it is not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 285321] Re: [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (= 2.0.0.3-1) but it is not installable
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: Sasa, is that ok now? Looks good to me, except that Firefox 2 removal isn't mentioned in the changelog. fabrice_sp, could you add that to your changelog entry? Thanks again. -- [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (= 2.0.0.3-1) but it is not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287253] [NEW] diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox
Public bug reported: Current version in intrepid depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox package. The attached debdiff fixes this bug. ** Affects: diggler (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287253 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287253] Re: diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox
** Attachment added: diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18783069/diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff ** Changed in: diggler (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Attachment removed: diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18783081/diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to- ubuntu2.diff -- diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287253 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287253] Re: diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox
** Attachment added: diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18783113/diggler-0.9-16ubuntu1-to-ubuntu2.diff -- diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 depends on firefox-3 instead on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287253 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 286225] Re: [intrepid] iceweasel-vimperator: Depends: iceweasel (= 3.0~) but it is not instalable
Hello fabrice_sp, There is abrowser package, which is unbranded Firefox 3. Please add optional dependency to it, along other suggested changes. Thank you. -- [intrepid] iceweasel-vimperator: Depends: iceweasel (= 3.0~) but it is not instalable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 285321] Re: [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (= 2.0.0.3-1) but it is not installable
Hello fabrice_sp, Firefox 2 has been removed from the archive some time ago. Please remove the link to its directory, /usr/firefox/extensions/. Also, there is abrowser package, which is unbranded Firefox 3. Please add optional dependency to it. Thank you. -- [Intrepid] iceweasel-itsalltext: Depends: iceweasel (= 2.0.0.3-1) but it is not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285281] Re: Gnome Voice Contol cannot be displayed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 252418 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252418 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 252418 gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy -- Gnome Voice Contol cannot be displayed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 273849] [NEW] Capture Page Ctrl+shift+L conflits with LiveHTTPHeaders
Hello arky, This is something that should be reported upstream. I'll make sure they hear of this, and find a solution. Thank you for reporting a bug. -- Capture Page Ctrl+shift+L conflits with LiveHTTPHeaders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox
** Also affects: bookmarksftp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox
** Changed in: bookmarksftp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Also affects: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: gecko-mediaplayer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gecko-mediaplayer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: mozplugger (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mozplugger (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: useragentswitcher (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: useragentswitcher (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: speeddial (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: speeddial (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: scrapbook (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: scrapbook (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: stanford-pwdhash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: stanford-pwdhash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: mozilla-stumbleupon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mozilla-stumbleupon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: nukeimage (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nukeimage (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: livehttpheaders (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: livehttpheaders (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: imagezoom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: imagezoom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: ctxextensions (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ctxextensions (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: mozgest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mozgest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: foxyproxy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: foxyproxy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: flashblock (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: flashblock (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: webdeveloper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: webdeveloper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: ubuntu-it-menu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-it-menu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: firefox-showcase (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: firefox-showcase (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: greasemonkey (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: greasemonkey (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: firebug (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: firebug (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: adblock-plus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: adblock-plus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: ubufox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Confirmed -- Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272959] [NEW] Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox
Public bug reported: Hello, Some of the packages (mostly Mozilla extensions and plugins) depend on both firefox and firefox-2, or just on firefox-2. Regarding planned Firefox 2 removal from the archives, we should change the dependencies by removing optional firefox-2 dependency, or investigating if there is an update, respectively. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 257307] Re: On installation netbeans-ide tries to overwrite a file contained in netbeans package
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Yulia Novozhilova wrote: Hello, why do you want them both? I don't. I hadn't used them before I tried to install them, so I didn't know if they're the same. Anyway, it may be a little confusing, so I think adding Conflicts line to debian/rules, as you suggest, would be a good thing. -- Best regards, Saša Bodiroža -- On installation netbeans-ide tries to overwrite a file contained in netbeans package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250769] Re: Firefox opens new popup window when leaving any page with swfdec content
** Also affects: firefox via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548993 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Firefox opens new popup window when leaving any page with swfdec content https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250769] Re: Firefox opens new popup window when leaving any page with swfdec content
Hello, Are you using nspluginwrapper? It seems to me that this was happening with nspluginwrapper 1.0.0. Version 1.1.0 should fix this bug, and it's available in Intrepid. If you are using nspluginwrapper, please upgrade it, and report if it works. Thank you. -- Firefox opens new popup window when leaving any page with swfdec content https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 254649] Re: Please merge scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable (main)
Hello,
I would like if you could improve this a bit more:
* additional dependency should be firefox-3.0, as firefox-3 package
doesn't exist. Please update that in the changelog entry, too.
* it seems that you missed to include few more remaining changes,
specifically Change iceweasel-scrapbook transitional package's arch
to all. from 1.3.2.5-2ubuntu2 and Modify Maintainer value to match
the DebianMaintainerField specification. from 1.3.2.5-2ubuntu1
* you can safely remove the line usr/share/scrapbook
usr/lib/iceweasel/extensions/{53A03D43-5363-4669-8190-99061B2DEBA5}
from debian/links, because we're not shipping Iceweasel. Pleas mention
that as a new change in the changelog.
Also, in case scrapbook 1.3.3.4 is compatible with Firefox 2, please
add firefox-2 package as additional dependency.
Thank you for your work.
--
Please merge scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254649
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257307] [NEW] On installation netbeans-ide tries to overwrite a file contained in netbeans package
Public bug reported: Hello, I have just tried installing both netbeans and netbeans-ide. I received this error: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/netbeans-ide_6.0.1+dfsg-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/applications/netbeans.desktop', which is also in package netbeans Maybe this can be fixed by replacing netbeans.desktop with netbeans- ide.desktop in netbeans-ide package. Thanks for looking into this bug. ** Affects: netbeans-ide (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- On installation netbeans-ide tries to overwrite a file contained in netbeans package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254649] Re: Please sync scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable
Hello, I think there are more changes from previous versions that need to be mentioned. There are a lot of changes to debian/control from version 1.3.2.5-2ubuntu1, which aren't mentioned in remaining changes. Please add them. Thanks for your work. -- Please sync scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254649] Re: Please sync scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable
Sorry, I mentioned changes only to debian/control file, but there are also some more. For example, this one: * Remove the iceweasel-scrapbook. prefix from file names. -- Please sync scrapbook-1.3.3.4-1(universe) from debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Hello Sveinung, I have look into this debdiff and it looks good. The needed changes are mostly correction of typos and maybe rewording in changelog entry in order to make it more clear: 1.) I would change debian/iceweasel-torbutton.* are still debian/firefox-torbutton.*. In previous upload, we changed them to torbutton-extension.*, so you can keep that message: * Modification of debian/iceweasel-torbutton.dirs, debian/iceweasel-torbutton.install and debian/iceweasel-torbutton.links to take into account firefox extensions directory and renaming them to the new binary package schema (torbutton-extension.*) In this upload, we are removing iceweasel-torbutton.*, so that shouldn't be mentioned in Remaining Ubuntu changes part, but as a new change: * Remove iceweasel-torbutton.*, since Ubuntu doesn't ship Iceweasel 2.) Link into where Firefox, not Iceweacel, looks has a typo. Should be Iceweasel 3.) Depend on Firfox 3 and 2 instead of Iceweacel has typos. Should be Firefox and Iceweasel. Also, I think it's correct to say Firefox 3 or 2, instead of using and. 4.) Check if the debdiff has an empty line at the end (line #162). If it has, please remove it. Thank you for your work :). -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Looks good. Ack from Mozilla Extensions team. Please resubscribe ubuntu- universe-sponsors, unassign yourself and set the status to Confirmed. Thanks for the merge :). About the change for iceweasel-torbutton.* and torbutton-extension.*... Moving of iceweasel-torbutton.* to torbutton-extension.* happened in the previous upload, so that is fine to keep it in remaining Ubuntu changes. But, according to previous changelog entry there were still iceweasel- torbutton.* files, which we removed now. That's why I asked you to indicate that as a new change :). -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219303] Re: Problem with OAFIID:GNOME_VoiceControlApplet while adding VoiceControl to GNOME Panel
Hello, I have uploaded gnome-voice-control for Gutsy and Hardy that solve these issues to my PPA [1], until they are published as stable release updates (see bug 252424 for Gutsy [2] and bug 252418 for Hardy [3]). The versions are OK, so once SRU's are published to primary Ubuntu archives, the versions from my PPA will be replaced with the usual update. [1] https://launchpad.net/~jazzva/+archive [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252424 [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252418 -- Problem with OAFIID:GNOME_VoiceControlApplet while adding VoiceControl to GNOME Panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219303 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration
This is a bug, known upstream, so I'm making this a bug report again in order to track status of the upstream bug. ** Summary changed: - Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration + Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration on amd64 ** Changed in: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High Status: Invalid = Confirmed ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #474376 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474376 ** Also affects: gnome-voice-control via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474376 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 243902] Re: mountnfs has wrong path for ifstate (should be under /var/run)
Moved to Intrepid last night, and I'm experiencing this bug. It seems to me that the problem occurs because in /etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs on line 120 it tries to grep /etc/network/run/ifstate, which doesn't exist. Changing that to /var/run/network/ifstate solved this for me. Although, I'm not sure if that's totally right. -- mountnfs has wrong path for ifstate (should be under /var/run) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 243902] Re: mountnfs has wrong path for ifstate (should be under /var/run)
Ah, sorry. I haven't noticed the same is reported in attachment in comment #3. -- mountnfs has wrong path for ifstate (should be under /var/run) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration
Hello Ben, As far as I can see, the problem might be that your sound card is recording only left channel, when it's recording in mono. Try right clicking on Volume control, then open the controls. Click on Settings. I have a Mix mono switch to select. That maybe enables mixing of both left and right channel into one, when recording in mono. Also, check with other sound devices. Some of theme have two volume controls for recording, so maybe one of them is muted. -- Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration
Hello Ben, Look under the recording tab for the muted channel. Also, check out the options inside File menu. I switched to 8.10 alpha 3 last night, and the volume control is a bit different. I suppose there should be options or settings under the File menu. Try changing the devices and see if any of the recording controls are muted. Unrelated to this, I'll switch this bug report to a question, since I don't think this actually qualifies as a bug. We'll see if we need to open another bug report and against which program after we solve your problem. -- Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration
I think this is not a bug. Some setting should be changed in volume control to fix this. After the problem is solved, we can open another bug report for this, in case it's really a bug. ** Changed in: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** bug changed to question: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-voice-control/+question/40773 -- Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252793] Re: xulrunner ships some images as executables
Hello Paolo, Thank you for your patch. It is applied to the development branch, so marking as Fix committed. The bug will auto-close once it gets published. ** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- xulrunner ships some images as executables https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253105] Re: Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration
Hello Ben, Thank you for your report. I have heard about this problem, and I'll see with upstream developers if it is fixed, and if it's a bug in gnome- voice-control, or something else. As a workaround, I might suggest this from comment #10 from bug 219303: I finally managed to fix this other bug : when recording with Audacity, it appeared than only the left channel was recorded. After some changes in the volume mixer, Audacity recorded then both left and right channel, and Voice Control has now its normal behavior (Init - Calibration - Ready). I'm sorry for this inconvenience. -- Gnome-Voice-Control: Stuck on Calibration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252793] Re: xulrunner ships some images as executables
** Summary changed: - xulrunner should not be executable + xulrunner ships some images as executables -- xulrunner ships some images as executables https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252418] Re: gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy
** Attachment added: gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352671/gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-voice-control
Hello,
gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, because it removes gnome-
- doc-utils.make on make distclean. It also fails to start because it
+ doc-utils.make on make distclean. It also fails to start because it
installs in /usr/libexec, instead of /usr/lib/gnome-voice-control.
- This bug has been addresed in development version by:
+ This bug has been addresed in development version (see LP #219303 [1]) by:
* removing gnome-doc-utils.make from DISTCLEANFILES in Makefile.{am,in}.
* changing the APPLET_LOCATION from $(prefix)/libexec/voice_control_applet
to $(libexecdir)/voice_control_applet. $(libexecdir) is set in debian/rules to
be /usr/lib/gnome-voice-control. This has been applied in 0.2-0ubuntu2, but has
been reverted back in some later version.
Also, automake call in debian/rules has been removed, in order to make sure
these changes won't be reverted again. I would leave it like this, until
upstream provides better make files. This, and previous bug will also be
discussed with the upstream.
To reproduce a bug, install gnome-voice-control 0.2-0ubuntu5, which is
currently in Hardy, and try to add it to the Gnome's panel. It will fail to
start.
To reproduce multibuild failing, run make distclean after build, and try to
build it again. It will fail, because of missing gnome-doc-utils.make.
As far as I can see, this patch has no regression potential.
+
+ [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219303
--
gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252418
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252418] [NEW] gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-voice-control
Hello,
gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, because it removes gnome-
doc-utils.make on make distclean. It also fails to start because it
installs in /usr/libexec, instead of /usr/lib/gnome-voice-control.
This bug has been addresed in development version (see LP #219303 [1]) by:
* removing gnome-doc-utils.make from DISTCLEANFILES in Makefile.{am,in}.
* changing the APPLET_LOCATION from $(prefix)/libexec/voice_control_applet to
$(libexecdir)/voice_control_applet. $(libexecdir) is set in debian/rules to be
/usr/lib/gnome-voice-control. This has been applied in 0.2-0ubuntu2, but has
been reverted back in some later version.
Also, automake call in debian/rules has been removed, in order to make sure
these changes won't be reverted again. I would leave it like this, until
upstream provides better make files. This, and previous bug will also be
discussed with the upstream.
To reproduce a bug, install gnome-voice-control 0.2-0ubuntu5, which is
currently in Hardy, and try to add it to the Gnome's panel. It will fail to
start.
To reproduce multibuild failing, run make distclean after build, and try to
build it again. It will fail, because of missing gnome-doc-utils.make.
As far as I can see, this patch has no regression potential.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219303
** Affects: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252418
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252424] Re: gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running
** Attachment added: gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352820/gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff ** Changed in: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252418] Re: gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy
** Attachment removed: gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352671/gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff ** Attachment added: gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352818/gvc_sru_hardy.debdiff ** Changed in: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe, and crashes in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252424] Re: gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running
** Attachment added: gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352800/gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff ** Attachment removed: gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352800/gvc_sru_gutsy.debdiff -- gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252424] [NEW] gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-voice-control
Hello,
gnome-voice-control build depends on automake-1.9, which doesn't exist
in gutsy. gnome-voice-control is not multibuild safe (after removed
automake-1.9 build-dependency and automake call in debian/rules),
because it removes gnome-doc-utils.make on make distclean. It also
fails to start because it installs in /usr/libexec, instead of /usr/lib
/gnome-voice-control.
This bugs have been addresed in development version (see LP #219303 [1]) by:
* removing gnome-doc-utils.make from DISTCLEANFILES in Makefile.{am,in}.
* changing the APPLET_LOCATION from $(prefix)/libexec/voice_control_applet to
$(libexecdir)/voice_control_applet. $(libexecdir) is set in debian/rules to be
/usr/lib/gnome-voice-control. This has been applied in 0.2-0ubuntu2, but has
been reverted back in some later version.
* automake call in debian/rules, and automake build-dependency have been
removed in order to make sure these changes won't be reverted again. I would
leave it like this, until upstream provides better make files. This, and
previous bug will also be discussed with the upstream.
To reproduce a FTBFS, grab gnome-voice-control 0.2-0ubuntu4 [2], and try to
build it. It will report unsatisfiable build-dependency.
To reproduce multibuild failing (once automake call is removed from
debian/rules, and automake-1.9 is removed from Build-deps), run make
distclean after build, and try to build it again. It will fail, because of
missing gnome-doc-utils.make.
To reproduce applet crash, once 0.2-0ubuntu4 is installed (after first change),
try to add it to the Gnome's panel. It will fail to start.
As far as I can see, this patch has no regression potential.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219303
[2]
https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/gnome-voice-control/0.2-0ubuntu4
** Affects: gnome-voice-control (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
--
gnome-voice-control FTBFS in Gutsy, crashes on running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Hello David, We're not shipping Iceweasel, so you can safely remove iceweasel dependency. We're also trying not to mention Iceweasel and Icedove in Description fields, in order not to confuse users. Changing Iceweasel to Firefox and Icedove to Thunderbird would be nice. You don't need to remove a part of description. It's usable, and by removing it we are making diff bigger than needed. You don't need to create usr/lib/iceweasel/extensions dir in torbutton-extension.dirs file, and link it in torbutton-extension.links file. Also, it looks like iceweasel-torbutton.* files are still in the debian/ dir. I think they are useless, since that package doesn't exist. I'll ask for another opinion. As far as I can see, you should remove them. The rest looks good. -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Hello David, Few more corrections are needed. src/install.rdf mentions that torbutton is compatible with Firefox 2 - 3.0a1pre. Please try to bump maxVersion for Firefox to 3.* in install.rdf and test if it works well in Firefox 3. If it doesn't we need to remove firefox package from Depends, as it provides Firefox 3. Also, you should add possible firefox-2 dependency, since that is the name of the package that provides Firefox 2. So, possible version of Depends line are: firefox | firefox-3.0 | firefox-2 - in case it works both with Firefox 3 and 2 firefox-2 - in case it's not working with latest Firefox 3 in intrepid. Thunderbird dependency should be dropped. It seems that this extensions is compatible with TB up to 1.5 version. Intrepid currently ships Thunderbird 2, so this extension won't work in it. Please make additional changes in torbutton-extensions.dirs and torbutton-extension.links file, which will reflect the changes in Depends. Firefox 2 extensions are in /usr/lib/firefox/extensions and Firefox 3 extensions are in /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions, so be sure to use that directories in .links file. Thank you for your work on this package. ** Changed in: torbutton (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Assignee: (unassigned) = David Futcher (bobbo) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251156] [NEW] Please update firefox-sage to 1.4.2
Public bug reported: Hello, I have prepared an update for firefox-sage package. It is located in my bzr branch, which is linked to this report. It brings the new update for Sage, which is compatible with Firefox 3. On the other hand, it's not compatible with Firefox 2, so the packaging had to be updated to reflex these changes. Additionally, I have updated packaging to make use of med-xpi-pack script which will be available soon in mozilla-devscripts package. ** Affects: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: firefox-sage (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: firefox-sage (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Status: New = Confirmed -- Please update firefox-sage to 1.4.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246275] Re: Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3
Here is the .diff.gz for the new upstream version. .tar.gz can be obtained with watch file. ** Attachment added: gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16203969/gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: gnome-mplayer (Ubuntu) Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246275] Re: Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3
I have just noticed that packaging date for Debian is in debian/copyright, instead of the old one. I'll upload the new .diff.gz soon. -- Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246275] Re: Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3
This one should be good. ** Attachment added: gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16204401/gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246275] Re: Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3
New diff.gz, with applied patch. ** Attachment added: gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16205065/gnome-mplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Please update gnome-mplayer to 0.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246276] Re: Please update gecko-mediaplayer to 0.6.3
Here is the .diff.gz for the new upstream version. .tar.gz can be obtained with watch file. ** Attachment added: gecko-mediaplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16205127/gecko-mediaplayer_0.6.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: gecko-mediaplayer (Ubuntu) Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- Please update gecko-mediaplayer to 0.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
