Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Nicolò Chieffo
I totally agree that it's confusing

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Mat Tomaszewski
Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
 I totally agree that it's confusing

   
Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used to?
I know it's not a justification, but OSX have been using exactly the 
same metaphor for many years now and it seems to be working out very well.

There was a significant problem with the old icon (2 monitors), it was 
*totally* mysterious (what 2 monitors have to do with network 
connection?) and we had many complaints.
There were couple of other reasons for trying out this new solution:

1. The *only* way to connect to a wireless network (which is the essence 
of connectivity these days) is by clicking on the network icon. 
Therefore it should be something that users would associate with 
wireless networking.
2. Having 0 signal = not connected may not be true from technical 
perspective, but it is true from practical perspective. You have no 
signal, therefore you won't be able to browse the web. Click on the icon 
to do something about it (check what's going on, connect to a different 
network, etc).


I appreciate critical voices, but please be constructive. One thing I'm 
sure of is that we will not bring back the old icon. :)
Any suggestions as to how to improve the current situation are more than 
welcome!

Many thanks,
Mat

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Nicolò Chieffo
 I appreciate critical voices, but please be constructive. One thing I'm sure
 of is that we will not bring back the old icon. :)
 Any suggestions as to how to improve the current situation are more than
 welcome!

Ok, I will be constructive: we need to find a generic icon that
represent all types of connections:
the 2 monitors icon was introduced to look like windows I think.

I have a question: when you connect to a GPRS connection, do you have
the same icon as the wifi?

if a common icon can't be found, the current one plus a red cross in
the bottom right is ok for me.

Now I'm doing a search at icons in gnome-look

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Max Bowsher
Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
 I totally agree that it's confusing

   
 Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used to?
 I know it's not a justification, but OSX have been using exactly the
 same metaphor for many years now and it seems to be working out very well.
 
 There was a significant problem with the old icon (2 monitors), it was
 *totally* mysterious (what 2 monitors have to do with network
 connection?) and we had many complaints.
 There were couple of other reasons for trying out this new solution:
 
 1. The *only* way to connect to a wireless network (which is the essence
 of connectivity these days) is by clicking on the network icon.
 Therefore it should be something that users would associate with
 wireless networking.
 2. Having 0 signal = not connected may not be true from technical
 perspective, but it is true from practical perspective. You have no
 signal, therefore you won't be able to browse the web. Click on the icon
 to do something about it (check what's going on, connect to a different
 network, etc).
 
 
 I appreciate critical voices, but please be constructive. One thing I'm
 sure of is that we will not bring back the old icon. :)
 Any suggestions as to how to improve the current situation are more than
 welcome!


There *is* a difference between 0 signal and not connected, even from a
practical perspective - 0 signal means you need to move closer to the
access point, not connected means you have to initiate a connection -
they're different failure modes with different practical action required.


I agree that it's a problem that there is no obvious icon to represent
the abstract concept of network. In absence of any better suggestions,
I agree with Nicolò Chieffo's suggestion - a red cross overlaid on the
existing icon would be a reasonable solution.


Max.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Nils Kassube
(``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
 human-icon-theme (0.33.2) jaunty; urgency=low

   * Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0%
 signal strength icon

  -- Kenneth Wimer kw...@ubuntu.com  Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:36:53 +0100


 Can this be reverted?
 The new icon is very deceiving, making me think I have my WiFi On,
 but with no signal. I rather have the old icon back.

Not only deceiving but really wrong, IMHO. I have a WLAN USB stick which 
has no signal strength indication. How can I distinguish between WiFi 
on and network offline?


Nils

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Mat Tomaszewski
Max Bowsher wrote:
 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
   
 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
 
 I totally agree that it's confusing

   
   
 Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used to?
 I know it's not a justification, but OSX have been using exactly the
 same metaphor for many years now and it seems to be working out very well.

 There was a significant problem with the old icon (2 monitors), it was
 *totally* mysterious (what 2 monitors have to do with network
 connection?) and we had many complaints.
 There were couple of other reasons for trying out this new solution:

 1. The *only* way to connect to a wireless network (which is the essence
 of connectivity these days) is by clicking on the network icon.
 Therefore it should be something that users would associate with
 wireless networking.
 2. Having 0 signal = not connected may not be true from technical
 perspective, but it is true from practical perspective. You have no
 signal, therefore you won't be able to browse the web. Click on the icon
 to do something about it (check what's going on, connect to a different
 network, etc).


 I appreciate critical voices, but please be constructive. One thing I'm
 sure of is that we will not bring back the old icon. :)
 Any suggestions as to how to improve the current situation are more than
 welcome!
 


 There *is* a difference between 0 signal and not connected, even from a
 practical perspective - 0 signal means you need to move closer to the
 access point, not connected means you have to initiate a connection -
 they're different failure modes with different practical action required.
   

It's a corner case (when your signal strenght is 0 you're likely to get 
disconnected anyway), but yes, agreed :)


 I agree that it's a problem that there is no obvious icon to represent
 the abstract concept of network. In absence of any better suggestions,
 I agree with Nicolò Chieffo's suggestion - a red cross overlaid on the
 existing icon would be a reasonable solution.

   
+1 from me.

Thanks!

Mat

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Nicolò Chieffo
are you going to change also nm-connection-editor.png ?
what is the offline icon in KDE?

proposal 1: we have 4 kind of network devices in the system (eth,
wifi, gprs, modem). It's not a good idea to forget the other icons.
So the best proposal for me would be a 'morphing' icon that is before
a cable + red cross (if an ethernet device is available), then the 0
signal wifi + red cross (if a wifi device is available), the the 0
signal gprs + red cross (if a gprs device is available), then a modem
+ red cross (if a modem device is available).

proposal 2:
Type  ---  Icon
folder  folder
file  file
email  mail
trash   trash
network   net?
In fact the meaning of network is that your computer is connected with
other computers creating a logical net.
Simple proposal: one computer in the bottom right, over a net (drawn
with dotted or dashed lines)

[O.T. starts here]

 the 2 monitors icon was introduced to look like windows I think.
 Yes, and that kinda answers the question why we didn't particularily like it 
 ;)

Windows is not bad... it's just different.
Apple is worse (philosophically speaking): closed source + closed
hardware licences only + price really overcharged = devil (for me)

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Mat Tomaszewski
Alexander Sack wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:17:32AM +, Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
   
 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
 
 I totally agree that it's confusing

   
   
 Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used to?
 I know it's not a justification, but OSX have been using exactly the 
 same metaphor for many years now and it seems to be working out very well.
 

 I have no strong opinion about this, except that its a coin flip which
 trades new confusion by exising users with no confusion for mac users
 migrating to ubuntu. Personally, I think there is no clear win with
 this new approach.

 However, i think there is a better solution available and if we think
 that that solution is the right way to go, we might consider to skip
 the current 00_signal step and wait for the right fix; which could be like:

  1. if no wireless card is available use the wired disconnected icon
   

+1
  2. if wireless card is available and you are not connected, use a
  searching icon if no APs are in reach/known or if there APs visible
  use a proper signal strength but indicate that we are not connected
  by using a grey/inactive appearence.

   

I'm more in favour of a simple solution - 0 signal+red x for not 
connected and then various signal strengths when connected.

Mat

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo
Olá Nicolò e a todos.

On Saturday 07 March 2009 13:11:29 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
 proposal 1: we have 4 kind of network devices in the system (eth,
 wifi, gprs, modem). It's not a good idea to forget the other icons.
 So the best proposal for me would be a 'morphing' icon that is before
 a cable + red cross (if an ethernet device is available), then the 0
 signal wifi + red cross (if a wifi device is available), the the 0
 signal gprs + red cross (if a gprs device is available), then a modem
 + red cross (if a modem device is available).

I like the idea of the red cross!

-- 
Hi, I'm BUGabundo, and I am Ubuntu (whyubuntu.com)
(``-_-´´)   http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
ps. My emails tend to sound authority and aggressive. I'm sorry in advance. 
I'll try to be more assertive as time goes by...


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo
Olá Mat e a todos.

On Saturday 07 March 2009 11:17:32 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
 Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used to?
 I know it's not a justification, but OSX have been using exactly the 
 same metaphor for many years now and it seems to be working out very well.

Never used a mac so i cant say, but i like the old icon, thats why i emailed 
the list in the 1st place! took me a few ours and reading the change log to 
understand why the heck my wifi was at zero, even though I hadnt connected it 
yet.. even restarted NM daemon and nm-applet to be sure.

 There was a significant problem with the old icon (2 monitors), it was 
 *totally* mysterious (what 2 monitors have to do with network 
 connection?) and we had many complaints.

mysterious?? it works *very* well to me. are we starting another UM word war? 
why do u guys feel the need to change what is *already* great?
Complains? can you give us one LP bug please?

 1. The *only* way to connect to a wireless network (which is the essence 
 of connectivity these days) is by clicking on the network icon. 
 Therefore it should be something that users would associate with 
 wireless networking.

I use wired everyday... how about that.. how wait... where do I press now to 
setup a manual IP? I only see and antena icon enh?

 I appreciate critical voices, but please be constructive. One thing I'm 
 sure of is that we will not bring back the old icon. :)
 Any suggestions as to how to improve the current situation are more than 
 welcome!

Earlier I saw one: red cross!!!

-- 
Hi, I'm BUGabundo, and I am Ubuntu (whyubuntu.com)
(``-_-´´)   http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
ps. My emails tend to sound authority and aggressive. I'm sorry in advance. 
I'll try to be more assertive as time goes by...


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Saturday 07 March 2009 6:17:32 am Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
  I totally agree that it's confusing
 

 Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used to?
 I know it's not a justification, but OSX have been using exactly the 
 same metaphor for many years now and it seems to be working out very well.
 
 There was a significant problem with the old icon (2 monitors), it was 
 *totally* mysterious (what 2 monitors have to do with network 
 connection?) and we had many complaints.

What about a greyed-out icon?

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Saturday 07 March 2009 11:15:29 am (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
  There was a significant problem with the old icon (2 monitors), it was 
  *totally* mysterious (what 2 monitors have to do with network 
  connection?) and we had many complaints.
 
 mysterious?? it works *very* well to me. are we starting another UM word 
war? why do u guys feel the need to change what is *already* great?
 Complains? can you give us one LP bug please?

If you don't think of a monitor as being the entire computer (maybe they 
should be iMacs?), 2 monitors connected could just be a KVM switch.

Also, that network monitor applet looks similar so it then it gets confusing 
for new users.  They delete the notification area and nm-applet disappears.  
Then they try to add it back with network monitor applet and can't figure out 
why it doesn't show networks anymore.  I'm sure you've seen this in #ubuntu 
before.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Saturday 07 March 2009 8:11:29 am Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
 are you going to change also nm-connection-editor.png ?
 what is the offline icon in KDE?

It's an unplugged cable.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-07 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On 07/03/2009 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:

 There was a significant problem with the old icon (2 monitors), it 
 was 
 *totally* mysterious (what 2 monitors have to do with network 
 connection?)

Two monitors represent two connected or disconnected computers 
(depending on other factors, e.g. the icon having a red cross on it).

 2. Having 0 signal = not connected may not be true from technical 
 perspective, but it is true from practical perspective. You have no 
 signal, therefore you won't be able to browse the web. Click on the 
 icon 
 to do something about it (check what's going on, connect to a 
 different 
 network, etc).

Everything these days can be argumented by saying that one should not 
take the practical point of view, but this change is extremely wrong, if 
you pass me the term. If there is no connection, there is no connection 
and I should try to connect. This I can do by looking at available 
wireless networks, or by plugging ethernet in.

If there is low signal, I have to improve the signal, e.g. by moving the 
laptop.

As usual, what I can say is do whatever you want with ubuntu, it's 
yours. However, I used to think that ubuntu was also mine, so let me 
spend a sentence on this. In my opinion, this change makes you think 
that you are connected and signal is low, even though you are not 
connected. Hence, you may not realise that you *have to* connect. If you 
travel a lot (as I do), it happens to have bad connections that 
sometimes don't work at all. Having a way to distinguish the two cases 
is very important in this case.

Vincenzo









-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss