[DOC]:baremetal kickstart document was old
recently i have test the CS + baremetal kickstart, found the baremetal kickstart document was old , https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+KickStart i want to have the right to update it , can someone give me the right to do that? My account name is my email address. -- Thanks, Jijun
Re: could not register iso
Thank you all for your responses. After refering logs and logging into console through virsh, seen that there is no link-local ip even though the link ip address is listed in web console. there is only 127.0.0.1 configure in ssvm. So where i'm missing. I'm using basic network, no vlans. only one subnet. Also pls note I skipped totally 8.1.7.2. Configuring the network bridges from the installation guide for kvm hypervisor. But cloudstack itself has created cloud0, cloudbr0 and vnet interfaces. -Raj On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.comwrote: Did you reboot the SSVM as well ? You might have to do this to take into affect. Let me know if that resolves it for you. On 16/10/13 6:22 AM, raj kumar rajkumar600...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, while registering iso, registration is successful, but it is not ready for use. after 20 to 30sec, it vanishes. I've added the http server in global settings secstorage.allowed.internal.sites. still no luck. both secodary and console system vms are running.
RE: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start
Did you allow ping traffic in ingress rules in the guest network? -Original Message- From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 2:44 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start So after changing my gateway to public address my System VMs started, I was able to download a ISO install an instance but I'm unable to ping the instance, or the VR, guest CIDR 10.1.1.0/24 guest traffic is in the same network as public traffic using vlan 100. this is how eth0 public interface looks like DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr0 DEVICE=eth0.99 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes VLAN=yes DEVICE=eth0.100 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes VLAN=yes I'm not sure if this is correct? Thanks, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much, my gateway was set to local network, Thanks, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Amogh Vasekar amogh.vase...@citrix.comwrote: Possibly - Your default gateway on the host is set to your internal 192.* gateway? What does route -n say? Thanks, Amogh On 10/11/13 9:18 AM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your reply, I blow out my installation, started from scratch; you mentioned that we don't configure bridge for guest VLAN traffic but Cloudstack did not configure it automatically. Also, I noticied after installed cloudstack-agent and configure advance zone four new interfaces appear vnet0 - vnet3. I don't know what that is. root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces cloud0 8000.fe00a9fe025f no vnet0 cloudbr08000.0015177b6765 no eth0 vnet2 cloudbr18000.0015177b6764 no eth1 vnet1 vnet3 virbr0 8000.525400643b18 yes virbr0-nic after re-installing Cloudstack-management on the management server and Cloudstack-agent on the KVM host configure two bridge cloudbr0 for public/guest and Cloudbr1 for managemen/storage, now my system VMs are running but when trying to download and iso, I get the follwoing error No route to host, here is my cloudbr0 bridge for public/guest traffic [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-cloudbr0 DEVICE=cloudbr0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge IPADDR=xxx..xxx GATEWAY=...xxx NETMASK=255.255.255.0 DNS1=8.8.8.8 base on eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr0 Thanks again, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Please post management server log and agent log from kvm (with debug enabled) to find out the issue . We don't have to created bridge with guest vlan for guest traffic. Cloudstack will configure it automatically on kvm when required. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:50 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start Hi, I posted this problem in the past and got no help, so I'm trying my luck again I install CS 4.2, configure advance zone for KVM cluster here is my brctl [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces cloud0 8000.fe00a9fe0212 no vnet0 cloudbr08000.0015177b6765 no eth0 vnet1 vnet3 cloudbr18000.0015177b6764 no eth1 vnet2 cloudbr99 8000.0015177b6764 no eth1.99 virbr0 8000.52540089a4da yes virbr0-nic I'm using inteface eth0 for management [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr0 here is bridge for eth0 DEVICE=cloudbr0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge IPADDR=192.168.0.10 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY=192.168.0.1 DNS1=8.8.8.8 I'm using eth1 for public/guest [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr1 here is bridge to public network untag in vlan 1 by default DEVICE=cloudbr1 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge IPADDR=98.234.34.208 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 I created VLAN 99 for guest traffic DEVICE=eth1.99 ONBOOT=yes VLAN=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr99 DEVICE=cloudbr99 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge IPADDR=10.1.1.2 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 DNS1=8.8.8.8 I'm using CLVM
Re: DevCloud-KVM
On Oct 16, 2013, at 7:57 PM, CK cloudw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi How is the nested visualization configured in the DevCloud appliance for VirtualBox? I have been trying to build my own DevCloud using Centos instead of Debian with KVM as the hypervisor in the DevCloud, but it looks like VirtualBox does not pass thru the Intel VMX flag to the Centos VM. hardware virtualization is not supported on Vbox. If you want to use KVM you need Vmware workstation or Fusion if you are on OSX. So how does the Xen nested virtualisation work in the Debian based DevCloud2? Xen works because it's a pv kernel. Regards
RE: Secondary Storage IP Subnet: Is it Optional or Mandatory?
Hi Rob, Even in 4.2 defining storage traffic is not mandatory while creating physical network. If you opt to have storage network then you have to specify IP range. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Rob C. [mailto:iose...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 4:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Secondary Storage IP Subnet: Is it Optional or Mandatory? Hi, According to some (possibly old) documentation I read, I have the impression that it is *optional* to define a secondary storage IP subnet. Note, my questions are all in the context of: - CloudStack 4.2 - ESXi hosts / vSphere 5.1 - Primary Storage is VMFS via fiber channel - Advanced Networking Here is the document to which I am referring, along with the relevant quotes: CloudStack System VMs: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/30149076/Cloudstack+System+VMs.pdf *Network Terminology - Storage: As it relates to CloudStack, this is an optional network dedicated to secondary storage. If not specified, the management network will be assumed for this role.* *SSVM - eth3 (storage): Note if a physical storage interface was not specified when creating the zone this interface will not exist. Storage traffic will assume the management interface* My Questions: 1. Is the above-referenced document accurate for CloudStack 4.2? 2. Do I interpret correctly that I don't need to define an IP subnet for Secondary Storage? 3. I have noticed that the CloudStack 4.2 Installation Guide, section 2.8.3 Advanced Zone Network Traffic Types, for the type Storage says: *You must configure the IP range to use for the storage network.* http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#advanced-zone-network-traffic-types How am I to interpret the quoted statement? Is it saying that I must configure a range regardless, or only if I *opt* to have a Secondary Storage network? If there is no Secondary Storage IP subnet, would I enter a range selected from the Management IP subnet? I am aware of the redundancy and performance benefits to using separate interfaces, this is not my concern here. My idea is to have a simplified CloudStack architecture by using a single IP subnet for CloudStack Management, and putting the NFS server on the same subnet (NFS to be used for Secondary Storage only). If your response is that a defined Secondary Storage IP subnet is a mandatory requirement, then I have a few other questions regarding this network: 4. I haven't found any documentation that helps with planning the size of the Secondary Storage network -- besides the NFS server and the SSVM, what other devices must have an IP address on this network? 5. How are IP addresses for devices on the Secondary Storage network assigned? In the case of the SSVM it must be dynamic, but if I were to manually put a CloudStack host onto this network (for convenience), what assures that the same IP address won't also get handed out to an SSVM? 6. Is it permitted to place the Secondary Storage traffic onto its own dedicated vSwitch on ESXi? According to the Installation Guide under section 8.3.5.1.1 Separating Traffic: *CloudStack allows you to use vCenter to configure three separate networks per ESXi host. *...* The allowed networks for configuration are public, guest, and private (for management and usually storage traffic).* This would suggest that storage traffic must share the same vSwitch as management traffic. If I am missing something fundamental, and/or asking the wrong questions, please correct me! Same goes if you have some general insight into the pros and cons of having a Secondary Storage IP subnet. Many thanks! Rob
Re: Secondary Storage IP Subnet: Is it Optional or Mandatory?
Hi Rob, The 'storage' network is indeed optional so your plan to not use it is perfectly valid. Simply put the NFS server on the management network or ensure there is a route to it via the management network. The SSVM will still get a virtual interface dedicated to storage, but it will be assigned an additional IP address from the management ip range. There is no need to configure any ip range for storage, and if using the add zone wizard it will not prompt you for one. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS On 17 Oct 2013, at 01:08, Rob C. iose...@gmail.commailto:iose...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, According to some (possibly old) documentation I read, I have the impression that it is *optional* to define a secondary storage IP subnet. Note, my questions are all in the context of: - CloudStack 4.2 - ESXi hosts / vSphere 5.1 - Primary Storage is VMFS via fiber channel - Advanced Networking Here is the document to which I am referring, along with the relevant quotes: CloudStack System VMs: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/30149076/Cloudstack+System+VMs.pdf *Network Terminology - Storage: As it relates to CloudStack, this is an optional network dedicated to secondary storage. If not specified, the management network will be assumed for this role.* *SSVM - eth3 (storage): Note if a physical storage interface was not specified when creating the zone this interface will not exist. Storage traffic will assume the management interface* My Questions: 1. Is the above-referenced document accurate for CloudStack 4.2? 2. Do I interpret correctly that I don't need to define an IP subnet for Secondary Storage? 3. I have noticed that the CloudStack 4.2 Installation Guide, section 2.8.3 Advanced Zone Network Traffic Types, for the type Storage says: *You must configure the IP range to use for the storage network.* http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#advanced-zone-network-traffic-types How am I to interpret the quoted statement? Is it saying that I must configure a range regardless, or only if I *opt* to have a Secondary Storage network? If there is no Secondary Storage IP subnet, would I enter a range selected from the Management IP subnet? I am aware of the redundancy and performance benefits to using separate interfaces, this is not my concern here. My idea is to have a simplified CloudStack architecture by using a single IP subnet for CloudStack Management, and putting the NFS server on the same subnet (NFS to be used for Secondary Storage only). If your response is that a defined Secondary Storage IP subnet is a mandatory requirement, then I have a few other questions regarding this network: 4. I haven't found any documentation that helps with planning the size of the Secondary Storage network -- besides the NFS server and the SSVM, what other devices must have an IP address on this network? 5. How are IP addresses for devices on the Secondary Storage network assigned? In the case of the SSVM it must be dynamic, but if I were to manually put a CloudStack host onto this network (for convenience), what assures that the same IP address won't also get handed out to an SSVM? 6. Is it permitted to place the Secondary Storage traffic onto its own dedicated vSwitch on ESXi? According to the Installation Guide under section 8.3.5.1.1 Separating Traffic: *CloudStack allows you to use vCenter to configure three separate networks per ESXi host. *...* The allowed networks for configuration are public, guest, and private (for management and usually storage traffic).* This would suggest that storage traffic must share the same vSwitch as management traffic. If I am missing something fundamental, and/or asking the wrong questions, please correct me! Same goes if you have some general insight into the pros and cons of having a Secondary Storage IP subnet. Many thanks! Rob This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under
XenServer Core and ACS 4.1 issue
Hello guys,
I was wondering if anyone managed to add the XenServer Core to ACS?
I was trying to setup the XenServer + ceph cluster and add it to ACS and
frankly not having much luck with the adding to ACS part. I am currently on ACS
4.1.1. To setup the XenServer + Ceph I've used the following guide:
http://xenserver.org/blog/entry/tech-preview-of-xenserver-libvirt-ceph.html
After sorting out a few issues not covered in this guide I've managed to add
Ceph cluster to my XenServer Core - I can see my Ceph Cluster as SR. However,
adding to ACS would give me the following error in the console:
2013-10-17 09:29:37,251 INFO [cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-6:null) Trying to add a new host at http://192.168.169.11 in
data center 1
2013-10-17 09:29:37,337 DEBUG [xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool]
(catalina-exec-6:null) Slave logon to 192.168.169.11
2013-10-17 09:29:37,398 DEBUG [xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool]
(catalina-exec-6:null) Logging on as the master to 192.168.169.11
2013-10-17 09:29:37,567 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) Seq 56-527224240: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
110514943262, via: 56, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{NetworkUsageAnswer:{routerName:r-638-VM,bytesSent:19552411933,bytesReceived:1162622661,result:true,details:,wait:0}}]
}
2013-10-17 09:29:37,567 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (RouterMonitor-1:null)
Seq 56-527224240: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 110514943262, via: 56, Ver: v1,
Flags: 10, { NetworkUsageAnswer } }
2013-10-17 09:29:37,567 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(RouterMonitor-1:null) Details from executing class
com.cloud.agent.api.NetworkUsageCommand:
2013-10-17 09:29:37,568 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (RouterMonitor-1:null)
Router stats changed from the time NetworkUsageCommand was sent. Ignoring
current answer. Router: r-638-VM Rcvd: 1162622661Sent: 19552411933
2013-10-17 09:29:37,568 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction]
(RouterMonitor-1:null) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name =
-VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl$NetworkUsageTask.run:883-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:471-FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset:351-FutureTask.runAndReset:178-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201:165-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run:267-ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker:1146-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:615-Thread.run:679;
called by
-Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl$NetworkUsageTask.run:938-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:471-FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset:351-FutureTask.runAndReset:178-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201:165-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run:267-ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker:1146-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:615-Thread.run:679
2013-10-17 09:29:37,804 DEBUG [xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer]
(catalina-exec-6:null) other exceptions: java.lang.NullPointerException
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer.createServerResource(XcpServerDiscoverer.java:417)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer.find(XcpServerDiscoverer.java:278)
at
com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHostsFull(ResourceManagerImpl.java:801)
at
com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHosts(ResourceManagerImpl.java:619)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.AddHostCmd.execute(AddHostCmd.java:143)
at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:162)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:505)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:355)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:302)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doPost(ApiServlet.java:71)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:555)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor.java:889)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:721)
at
Re: could not register iso
configured manually link-local ip listed in the web in ssvm with gateway ip(hypervisor link local ip) stopped iptables in both hypervisor and ssvm. I can able to ssh. if iptables is running i can't ssh. tried adding iso. but not successful. log shows [storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-2:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:03 PM, raj kumar rajkumar600...@gmail.comwrote: Thank you all for your responses. After refering logs and logging into console through virsh, seen that there is no link-local ip even though the link ip address is listed in web console. there is only 127.0.0.1 configure in ssvm. So where i'm missing. I'm using basic network, no vlans. only one subnet. Also pls note I skipped totally 8.1.7.2. Configuring the network bridges from the installation guide for kvm hypervisor. But cloudstack itself has created cloud0, cloudbr0 and vnet interfaces. -Raj On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.comwrote: Did you reboot the SSVM as well ? You might have to do this to take into affect. Let me know if that resolves it for you. On 16/10/13 6:22 AM, raj kumar rajkumar600...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, while registering iso, registration is successful, but it is not ready for use. after 20 to 30sec, it vanishes. I've added the http server in global settings secstorage.allowed.internal.sites. still no luck. both secodary and console system vms are running.
cloudstack4.2.0 network configuration - ssvm has no IP
Hi, I'd like to use basic network configuration. No vlans in the network. I've two networks. one is primary used for all cloudstack servers(guest, system vms, management server, hypervisor, etc). another one is connected to storage. only hypervisors(kvm) have access to this network. my questions. 1. what should be my network configuration in hypervisors. I've used eth0, and cloudstack automatically created cloud0, cloudbr0, etc. 2. Even though ssvm is up, it didn't get any IP. Hence I could not connect the console from web or can't add any iso. please let me know what should be my configuration and how to fix the ssvm issue.
Public IP Address attached to Instance: Where does it reside?
Hi CS Users. Simple question I think. I've acquired a Public IP and created some port forwarding rules to an instance. (KVM, Advanced Setup). My question is where does this Public IP actually reside? I've checked the Virtual Router for the network it's been assigned to but cannot see it bound to an interface on the VR. Regards Ronald
RE: Public IP Address attached to Instance: Where does it reside?
The Public IP is assigned to the Public Interface of the VR Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: ronald higgins [mailto:ronald.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 October 2013 11:30 To: users Subject: Public IP Address attached to Instance: Where does it reside? Hi CS Users. Simple question I think. I've acquired a Public IP and created some port forwarding rules to an instance. (KVM, Advanced Setup). My question is where does this Public IP actually reside? I've checked the Virtual Router for the network it's been assigned to but cannot see it bound to an interface on the VR. Regards Ronald This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Public IP Address attached to Instance: Where does it reside?
Hi, The public ip address is assigned to public interface of the VR. You can't see using ifconfig command. To see the ip addresses assigned use the below command. ip addr show Thanks, Jayapal On 17-Oct-2013, at 3:59 PM, ronald higgins ronald.higg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi CS Users. Simple question I think. I've acquired a Public IP and created some port forwarding rules to an instance. (KVM, Advanced Setup). My question is where does this Public IP actually reside? I've checked the Virtual Router for the network it's been assigned to but cannot see it bound to an interface on the VR. Regards Ronald
Re: XenServer Core and ACS 4.1 issue
Xenserver core is not a supported hypervisor. For ACS 4.1 the supported XS
versions are 5.6 sp2, 6.0, 6.0.2, 6.1.
On 17-Oct-2013, at 2:04 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Hello guys,
I was wondering if anyone managed to add the XenServer Core to ACS?
I was trying to setup the XenServer + ceph cluster and add it to ACS and
frankly not having much luck with the adding to ACS part. I am currently on
ACS 4.1.1. To setup the XenServer + Ceph I've used the following guide:
http://xenserver.org/blog/entry/tech-preview-of-xenserver-libvirt-ceph.html
After sorting out a few issues not covered in this guide I've managed to add
Ceph cluster to my XenServer Core - I can see my Ceph Cluster as SR. However,
adding to ACS would give me the following error in the console:
2013-10-17 09:29:37,251 INFO [cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-6:null) Trying to add a new host at http://192.168.169.11 in
data center 1
2013-10-17 09:29:37,337 DEBUG [xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool]
(catalina-exec-6:null) Slave logon to 192.168.169.11
2013-10-17 09:29:37,398 DEBUG [xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool]
(catalina-exec-6:null) Logging on as the master to 192.168.169.11
2013-10-17 09:29:37,567 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) Seq 56-527224240: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
110514943262, via: 56, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{NetworkUsageAnswer:{routerName:r-638-VM,bytesSent:19552411933,bytesReceived:1162622661,result:true,details:,wait:0}}]
}
2013-10-17 09:29:37,567 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(RouterMonitor-1:null) Seq 56-527224240: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
110514943262, via: 56, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { NetworkUsageAnswer } }
2013-10-17 09:29:37,567 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(RouterMonitor-1:null) Details from executing class
com.cloud.agent.api.NetworkUsageCommand:
2013-10-17 09:29:37,568 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (RouterMonitor-1:null)
Router stats changed from the time NetworkUsageCommand was sent. Ignoring
current answer. Router: r-638-VM Rcvd: 1162622661Sent: 19552411933
2013-10-17 09:29:37,568 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction]
(RouterMonitor-1:null) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 1 Name =
-VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl$NetworkUsageTask.run:883-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:471-FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset:351-FutureTask.runAndReset:178-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201:165-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run:267-ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker:1146-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:615-Thread.run:679;
called by
-Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl$NetworkUsageTask.run:938-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:471-FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset:351-FutureTask.runAndReset:178-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201:165-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run:267-ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker:1146-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:615-Thread.run:679
2013-10-17 09:29:37,804 DEBUG [xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer]
(catalina-exec-6:null) other exceptions: java.lang.NullPointerException
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer.createServerResource(XcpServerDiscoverer.java:417)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer.find(XcpServerDiscoverer.java:278)
at
com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHostsFull(ResourceManagerImpl.java:801)
at
com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHosts(ResourceManagerImpl.java:619)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.AddHostCmd.execute(AddHostCmd.java:143)
at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:162)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:505)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:355)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:302)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doPost(ApiServlet.java:71)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:555)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at
Re: Public IP Address attached to Instance: Where does it reside?
Awesome. Thanks Jayapal :) On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, The public ip address is assigned to public interface of the VR. You can't see using ifconfig command. To see the ip addresses assigned use the below command. ip addr show Thanks, Jayapal On 17-Oct-2013, at 3:59 PM, ronald higgins ronald.higg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi CS Users. Simple question I think. I've acquired a Public IP and created some port forwarding rules to an instance. (KVM, Advanced Setup). My question is where does this Public IP actually reside? I've checked the Virtual Router for the network it's been assigned to but cannot see it bound to an interface on the VR. Regards Ronald
Re: could not register iso
Hi Raj, You don't have to configure bridges on the host in the first place, as you pointed out cloudstack does that, check if the version of system template you have added is correct. As pointed out reboot ssvm once. The above log is a warning not an error, I am not sure about the reason as I am getting this warning, but everything else seems to work fine, I added KVM and Xen hosts, created instances. Can you post detailed logs from management server , cloud agent logs and the ssvm logs. Regards, On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:05 PM, raj kumar rajkumar600...@gmail.com wrote: configured manually link-local ip listed in the web in ssvm with gateway ip(hypervisor link local ip) stopped iptables in both hypervisor and ssvm. I can able to ssh. if iptables is running i can't ssh. tried adding iso. but not successful. log shows [storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-2:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:03 PM, raj kumar rajkumar600...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you all for your responses. After refering logs and logging into console through virsh, seen that there is no link-local ip even though the link ip address is listed in web console. there is only 127.0.0.1 configure in ssvm. So where i'm missing. I'm using basic network, no vlans. only one subnet. Also pls note I skipped totally 8.1.7.2. Configuring the network bridges from the installation guide for kvm hypervisor. But cloudstack itself has created cloud0, cloudbr0 and vnet interfaces. -Raj On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: Did you reboot the SSVM as well ? You might have to do this to take into affect. Let me know if that resolves it for you. On 16/10/13 6:22 AM, raj kumar rajkumar600...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, while registering iso, registration is successful, but it is not ready for use. after 20 to 30sec, it vanishes. I've added the http server in global settings secstorage.allowed.internal.sites. still no luck. both secodary and console system vms are running. -- Chirag Choudhary, Software Engineer
hackathons so far
Users and developers, So far the list of hackathons on CCC Europe has taken a serious shape. Don't forget to check and make sure your personal or company interest is represented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CCC+Europe: h2. hackathon proposals || chair || subject || description || | Daan/? | automated testing | Improve the quality of releases by adding more unit and integration tests to our automated test-suites. Discuss whether the present suites of unit tests and bvt are enough or we might need more classes of tests (i.e. component level and a seperation of integration from functional tests) | | Daan/? | modularization and plug-ability | make cloudstack more plug-able and maintainable by 3rd party vendors. At the moment several mudularization efforts are on the way. The UI guys are working on splitting css, the storare guys are driving towards a better plug-model for drivers and at a system level work is being done on better organizing the injection framework. These might be worth separate hackathons but a measure of communication is no luxury. | |wido| Review Ceph integration | Further review and improve the Ceph RBD integration for KVM and also look at Xen | |Sebastien ? | API Interfaces | (AWS refactor, GCE, OCCICIMI standard): Discuss the state of our interfaces, plans for future, needs etc. AWS interface might need a refactor, GCE is a new interface, OCCI is a standard and Isaac Chiang has developed an interface. We are missing a CIMI interface. | |Sebastien ? | DOCs | We are having lots of talks about docs, they have been split in a separate repo, we need to discuss format, release life cycle, format etc. | |Sebastien /Wido ? | KVM Agent re-factor | There has been discussions/wishes to re-write the KVM agent in something else than Java. Review architecture, define a plan, find developers :) | |Sebastien ? | Ecosystem support | The are lots of tools in the cloud ecosystem, we should talk about docker, ansible, cloud foundry/bosh…etc.and define a plan to have great cloudstack support in all of those. | |Abhinandan/Jayapal | Virtual Router | Hacking various services running on the virtual router and the services configuration via management server. | |Kishan Kavala | Usage | Creating a flexible usage framework so that new usage entities could be added easily. | regards, Daan
Re: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start
Thank you Sanjeev, that was solved my problem! On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote: Did you allow ping traffic in ingress rules in the guest network? -Original Message- From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 2:44 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start So after changing my gateway to public address my System VMs started, I was able to download a ISO install an instance but I'm unable to ping the instance, or the VR, guest CIDR 10.1.1.0/24 guest traffic is in the same network as public traffic using vlan 100. this is how eth0 public interface looks like DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr0 DEVICE=eth0.99 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes VLAN=yes DEVICE=eth0.100 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes VLAN=yes I'm not sure if this is correct? Thanks, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much, my gateway was set to local network, Thanks, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Amogh Vasekar amogh.vase...@citrix.comwrote: Possibly - Your default gateway on the host is set to your internal 192.* gateway? What does route -n say? Thanks, Amogh On 10/11/13 9:18 AM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your reply, I blow out my installation, started from scratch; you mentioned that we don't configure bridge for guest VLAN traffic but Cloudstack did not configure it automatically. Also, I noticied after installed cloudstack-agent and configure advance zone four new interfaces appear vnet0 - vnet3. I don't know what that is. root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces cloud0 8000.fe00a9fe025f no vnet0 cloudbr08000.0015177b6765 no eth0 vnet2 cloudbr18000.0015177b6764 no eth1 vnet1 vnet3 virbr0 8000.525400643b18 yes virbr0-nic after re-installing Cloudstack-management on the management server and Cloudstack-agent on the KVM host configure two bridge cloudbr0 for public/guest and Cloudbr1 for managemen/storage, now my system VMs are running but when trying to download and iso, I get the follwoing error No route to host, here is my cloudbr0 bridge for public/guest traffic [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-cloudbr0 DEVICE=cloudbr0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge IPADDR=xxx..xxx GATEWAY=...xxx NETMASK=255.255.255.0 DNS1=8.8.8.8 base on eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr0 Thanks again, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Please post management server log and agent log from kvm (with debug enabled) to find out the issue . We don't have to created bridge with guest vlan for guest traffic. Cloudstack will configure it automatically on kvm when required. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:50 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start Hi, I posted this problem in the past and got no help, so I'm trying my luck again I install CS 4.2, configure advance zone for KVM cluster here is my brctl [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces cloud0 8000.fe00a9fe0212 no vnet0 cloudbr08000.0015177b6765 no eth0 vnet1 vnet3 cloudbr18000.0015177b6764 no eth1 vnet2 cloudbr99 8000.0015177b6764 no eth1.99 virbr0 8000.52540089a4da yes virbr0-nic I'm using inteface eth0 for management [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr0 here is bridge for eth0 DEVICE=cloudbr0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge IPADDR=192.168.0.10 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY=192.168.0.1 DNS1=8.8.8.8 I'm using eth1 for public/guest [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr1 here is bridge to public network untag in vlan 1 by default DEVICE=cloudbr1 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge
Re: DevCloud with Centos and Xen
For my host, I have Xen(XCP) running on Centos6.4, is there a plugin or something that I also need to setup/configure on this host for it to be recoginised by CloudStack 4.2? At the moment when I try to Add Host it does not find it, what does cloudstack look for on the host to identify it is a Xen host? On 10 October 2013 19:35, Travis Graham tgra...@tgraham.us wrote: I have no real idea of how the LXC implementation works, but it's layered on top of libvirt and it's KVM/QEMU drivers. Would tapping into libvirt in the same way with it's Xen driver be possible? And I ask that having zero idea of how CS uses QEMU and libvirt to get its hooks into KVM or KVM itself or LXC. Travis On Oct 10, 2013, at 2:27 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:15 PM, CK cloudw...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone know if Centos 4.2 running Xen (not xenserver) hypervisor work with CloudStack 4.2? In a few words; not easily. CloudStack talks to the XenAPI - which CentOS doesn't have by default. There was some work to build XAPI on EL6 with the CentOS + Xen work that was happening, but I don't know where that stands. If you did get XAPI on CentOS, you'd still likely need to fake the version information. --David
Re: [cloudmonkey] username / password support
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Fixed pep8 and other issues (with flake8). Does this warrant a new release? The idea of fast iteration and release process was to get even smallest feature that is tested and works out in the public, so yes let's test it, fix/add docs and whatnot, and release it. If you insist we can have weekly/monthly release windows (but no longer than that please), so we won't end up releasing for every single feature. Advise? Cheers. On 10/16/13 11:13 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Passwords can be changed too. No difference in security, IMO. Plus the api key option is always there. In fact I first wrote it as an option ( --populate-api-keys USERNAME:PASSWORD), but decided that it didn't buy anything. The original code didn't pass pep8 (imports not being used etc), that's probably a separate patch. -Original Message- From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 10:50 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [cloudmonkey] username / password support I never intended to have support for password as I thought people will end up using and storing plain text username/password, keys (specific for cloudmonkey) are revokable :) Maybe we can use usernames/password initially to create keys or maybe let users decided what they want. If this could be refactored as a reusable module Prasanna can use this for Marvin. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Sorry, urllib2 and cookiejar looked just too painful. Totally agree, we should throw away painful things for better ones. With requests as dependency in setup.py so no one has to install it manually. You just do pip install --upgrade stuff and pip would get all the deps from setup.py. Thanks Prasanna for adding that, maybe specify a minimum or maximum version? Initially my idea was to use least possible dependency, like have cloudmonkey pure python 2.6 program that just uses standard libs but eventually added prettytable and pygments. We should have more good stuff, remove painful libs. Lastly, could the code be pep8'd, tested and released :) Cheers, bhaisaab On 10/15/13 9:26 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: I fixed this temporarily by adding the requests as a dependency. But may be we could do the login using urllib2 itself to avoid the requests dependency. +1 to username,password login. I need to add that to marvin too. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:38:40AM +0800, Ryan Lei wrote: I was unable to run cloudmonkey after applying your update. My commands were: $ git checkout username_password_support $ git pull $ python setup.py build $ python setup.py install $ cloudmonkey Then I got this import error: Import error in cloudmonkey.requester : No module named requests Switching back to master branch runs fine, however. - -- Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Researcher Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory ryan...@cht.com.tw https://email.cht.com.tw/owa/redir.aspx?C=-wE1FEC3G0SW YpVkiWo8SsDdf3ZqO9AIuAPTzRnFYCUi-z4YljtI_hyVKkNHfn9F1Bn-vUWJnQ4.URL =mail to%3aryanlei%40cht.com.tw or ryanlei750...@gmail.com On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Hi folks, I modified cloudmonkey to work off of username and password. Feedback and testing required. The code is in the branch username_password_support http://goo.gl/5xTgo5 Thanks -- Chiradeep -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Doc Updates
Fred, The updated doc I saw was this one: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/index.html If you look at this section: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#prepare-system-vm-template You will see the updated templates. Not sure what else changed. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Fred Messinger fredmessin...@gmail.comwrote: David, Would you mind posting the url for the update you reference? I'm looking at the 4.2 view on buildacloud.com and the last update there was a month ago. So I assume I'm looking in the wrong place. Thanks, Fred On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:07 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: And just as a heads up, thanks for help from Prasanna and Travis, I've published an updated version of the IG for 4.2, hopefully that at least gets us 'installable'. --David On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:10 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Travis Graham tgra...@tgraham.us wrote: What's an acceptable/expected timeframe for rolling out the published fixes once a patch has made it's way in? Is that something that can be automated after a successful Jenkins run? Travis It depends on the scope of changes. For a document like the release notes, assuming someone already has an updated SVN tree, it shouldn't take more than 30 minutes to update, and it could happen pretty regularly. If it's every document in a single release, that's historically taken the better part of a day. I don't think we'll get away with getting it to happen in an automated fashion, simply because it requires commit access to SVN, which is tied to an individual, which means someone would need to expose their creds, which would be a bad thing. --David
Re: Missing jar vmware-lib-jaxrpc.jar?
Fred, Attachements are stripped from maila to the list. It sounds like this is your problem yes. Why don't you try adding the jar and restarting the ms? regards, Daan On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Fred Messinger fredmessin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2 using vmware. And I think I am SO close! My management server log file is attached. It describes some deserialization problems and it also shows that a VMware resource class file cannot be loaded. From googling the exception, I found this jira ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-211 Is the reason I can't start my ssvm because of this? Thanks, Fred
Public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0
All, Now I'm curious about public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0. I have one IPv4 /27 for Public IPs and that's working fine. Now what I want to do is assign a live IP address from another /27 to a Guest VM, which appears to work but can't actually touch the default gateway. So here's the rub: The default gateway is actually provided as a virtual IP on two VRRP nodes (for A/B redundancy) by my upstream provider. I can ping the two VRRP routers, I can see the VM has the proper IP address, netmask, and default gateway; and I can configure the VM with a proper IP config which never finds the default gateway IP. The arp cache sees the local MAC address and incomplete for the gateway. So now I'm thinking; according to cloudstack, is the default gateway plumbed on a virtual router? If so, how does THAT route out to the world? I also have a /64 of IPv6 space, /96 of which I have configured in a network offering which has the same upstream infrastructure situation. Same lack of functionality there. So how do I configure my Guest real IP netblocks? Is it okay to be looking for a default gateway IP on a my provider's core router or do I need to have them statically route that netblock to something like the cloudstack management host? Of course I could also have the network offering wrong or incomplete. Any thoughts or pointers to documentation would be appreciated. I can tell I'm making progress because I keep dealing with progressively higher level errors. :) Thanks. Bryan Manske --- Earnest falsehoods left unchallenged risk being accepted as fact. -- Monty xiphmont Montgomery - Xiph Foundation, on the Ogg format ---
CS 4.2 System VMs not starting
Hello, install Cloudstack 4.2 with KVM hypervisors, Console Proxy MV started but I am not able to ping the private or public IP, second VM won't start. When I ran the command [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# virsh list IdName State 2 v-2-VM running 4 s-3-VM running [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# I see both VMs running; I configured zone with advance network, guest/public network on eth0, management/storage on eth1 any ideas or suggestions? Thanks,
Re: CS 4.2 System VMs not starting
Hello! I stucked something like this in Xen. The problem was the networks (and vlans) on sysvm. Can you ssh it (in xen, ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 169.254.X.Y from the xen host machine, which own the guest), and check the network avaibility of the system vm? Best regards, Peter 2013.10.17. 22:31 keltezéssel, motty cruz írta: Hello, install Cloudstack 4.2 with KVM hypervisors, Console Proxy MV started but I am not able to ping the private or public IP, second VM won't start. When I ran the command [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# virsh list IdName State 2 v-2-VM running 4 s-3-VM running [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# I see both VMs running; I configured zone with advance network, guest/public network on eth0, management/storage on eth1 any ideas or suggestions? Thanks,
Re: CS 4.2 System VMs not starting
Thanks Peter, I tried the command you suggested, [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 169.254.3.53 Warning: Identity file .ssh/id_rsa.cloud not accessible: No such file or directory. ssh: connect to host 169.254.3.53 port 3922: No route to host [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# do you mind providing the config file of your vlans? I believe VLANs are not configure properly here is my management/storage bridge less ifcfg-eth1: DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:25:90:88:51:5D ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr1 [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-cloudbr1: DEVICE=cloudbr1 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge IPADDR=10.107.0.7 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 DNS1=8.8.8.8 DNS2=10.0.10.0 Thank you for your support! On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote: Hello! I stucked something like this in Xen. The problem was the networks (and vlans) on sysvm. Can you ssh it (in xen, ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 169.254.X.Y from the xen host machine, which own the guest), and check the network avaibility of the system vm? Best regards, Peter 2013.10.17. 22:31 keltezéssel, motty cruz írta: Hello, install Cloudstack 4.2 with KVM hypervisors, Console Proxy MV started but I am not able to ping the private or public IP, second VM won't start. When I ran the command [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# virsh list IdName State --**-- 2 v-2-VM running 4 s-3-VM running [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# I see both VMs running; I configured zone with advance network, guest/public network on eth0, management/storage on eth1 any ideas or suggestions? Thanks,
Re: CS 4.2 System VMs not starting
Hi, use the key file at /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud If it not found, locate key file Thanks, Jayapal On 18-Oct-2013, at 2:41 AM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Peter, I tried the command you suggested, [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 169.254.3.53 Warning: Identity file .ssh/id_rsa.cloud not accessible: No such file or directory. ssh: connect to host 169.254.3.53 port 3922: No route to host [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# do you mind providing the config file of your vlans? I believe VLANs are not configure properly here is my management/storage bridge less ifcfg-eth1: DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:25:90:88:51:5D ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr1 [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-cloudbr1: DEVICE=cloudbr1 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge IPADDR=10.107.0.7 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 DNS1=8.8.8.8 DNS2=10.0.10.0 Thank you for your support! On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote: Hello! I stucked something like this in Xen. The problem was the networks (and vlans) on sysvm. Can you ssh it (in xen, ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 169.254.X.Y from the xen host machine, which own the guest), and check the network avaibility of the system vm? Best regards, Peter 2013.10.17. 22:31 keltezéssel, motty cruz írta: Hello, install Cloudstack 4.2 with KVM hypervisors, Console Proxy MV started but I am not able to ping the private or public IP, second VM won't start. When I ran the command [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# virsh list IdName State --**-- 2 v-2-VM running 4 s-3-VM running [root@kvm1 network-scripts]# I see both VMs running; I configured zone with advance network, guest/public network on eth0, management/storage on eth1 any ideas or suggestions? Thanks,
RE: cloudstack4.2.0 network configuration - ssvm has no IP
Hi, While creating a zone you must specify guest and management traffic with ip ranges from your primary network. If you want to use dedicated storage network then add the storage traffic to physical network (during zone creation) and specify ip range from your second network. This should work find. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: raj kumar [mailto:rajkumar600...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:39 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: cloudstack4.2.0 network configuration - ssvm has no IP Hi, I'd like to use basic network configuration. No vlans in the network. I've two networks. one is primary used for all cloudstack servers(guest, system vms, management server, hypervisor, etc). another one is connected to storage. only hypervisors(kvm) have access to this network. my questions. 1. what should be my network configuration in hypervisors. I've used eth0, and cloudstack automatically created cloud0, cloudbr0, etc. 2. Even though ssvm is up, it didn't get any IP. Hence I could not connect the console from web or can't add any iso. please let me know what should be my configuration and how to fix the ssvm issue.
RE: Public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0
Hi, If you are creating isolated network with your /27 cidr and deploying vm in that , default gateway on the vm will always points to ip address configured on the virtual routers guest interface. So for the vms to point to the gateway in /27 cidr, create a shared network and deploy vm in that. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Bryan Manske [mailto:br...@manske.org] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 1:20 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0 All, Now I'm curious about public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0. I have one IPv4 /27 for Public IPs and that's working fine. Now what I want to do is assign a live IP address from another /27 to a Guest VM, which appears to work but can't actually touch the default gateway. So here's the rub: The default gateway is actually provided as a virtual IP on two VRRP nodes (for A/B redundancy) by my upstream provider. I can ping the two VRRP routers, I can see the VM has the proper IP address, netmask, and default gateway; and I can configure the VM with a proper IP config which never finds the default gateway IP. The arp cache sees the local MAC address and incomplete for the gateway. So now I'm thinking; according to cloudstack, is the default gateway plumbed on a virtual router? If so, how does THAT route out to the world? I also have a /64 of IPv6 space, /96 of which I have configured in a network offering which has the same upstream infrastructure situation. Same lack of functionality there. So how do I configure my Guest real IP netblocks? Is it okay to be looking for a default gateway IP on a my provider's core router or do I need to have them statically route that netblock to something like the cloudstack management host? Of course I could also have the network offering wrong or incomplete. Any thoughts or pointers to documentation would be appreciated. I can tell I'm making progress because I keep dealing with progressively higher level errors. :) Thanks. Bryan Manske --- Earnest falsehoods left unchallenged risk being accepted as fact. -- Monty xiphmont Montgomery - Xiph Foundation, on the Ogg format ---
Re: Public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0
Create share network with your ip ranges and add vm nic to in the share network. -Jayapal On 18-Oct-2013, at 10:51 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, If you are creating isolated network with your /27 cidr and deploying vm in that , default gateway on the vm will always points to ip address configured on the virtual routers guest interface. So for the vms to point to the gateway in /27 cidr, create a shared network and deploy vm in that. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Bryan Manske [mailto:br...@manske.org] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 1:20 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0 All, Now I'm curious about public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0. I have one IPv4 /27 for Public IPs and that's working fine. Now what I want to do is assign a live IP address from another /27 to a Guest VM, which appears to work but can't actually touch the default gateway. So here's the rub: The default gateway is actually provided as a virtual IP on two VRRP nodes (for A/B redundancy) by my upstream provider. I can ping the two VRRP routers, I can see the VM has the proper IP address, netmask, and default gateway; and I can configure the VM with a proper IP config which never finds the default gateway IP. The arp cache sees the local MAC address and incomplete for the gateway. So now I'm thinking; according to cloudstack, is the default gateway plumbed on a virtual router? If so, how does THAT route out to the world? I also have a /64 of IPv6 space, /96 of which I have configured in a network offering which has the same upstream infrastructure situation. Same lack of functionality there. So how do I configure my Guest real IP netblocks? Is it okay to be looking for a default gateway IP on a my provider's core router or do I need to have them statically route that netblock to something like the cloudstack management host? Of course I could also have the network offering wrong or incomplete. Any thoughts or pointers to documentation would be appreciated. I can tell I'm making progress because I keep dealing with progressively higher level errors. :) Thanks. Bryan Manske --- Earnest falsehoods left unchallenged risk being accepted as fact. -- Monty xiphmont Montgomery - Xiph Foundation, on the Ogg format ---
