RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverse on Windows
If I understand you correctly, you are saying that your reverse proxy does not serve the documents that you expect it to, but that any document requested is served by the backend. That is because of the ProxyPass directive that passes all requests having the URL path prefix / to the backend. If you give a more specific path as the first argument to ProxyPass, only requests for URL paths starting with that prefix will be passed to the backend. You can also specify exceptions that are to be served by the reverse proxy by adding the following line to the top of your list of ProxyPass directives: ProxyPass /path/to/exception ! -ascs -Original Message- From: Avraham Shapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 10:05 PM To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV; users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverse on Windows Importance: Low ** Low Priority ** Yes. I tried and: At this point the ip address works as reverse proxy the DNS address works as reverse proxy hardcoding address 192.168.0.2 works. For some strange reason 192.168.0.1 (the local host) doesn't work (i.e. get served by the connected host). I'm looking into that one, though we really wont have much need for it, given the above Thanks. Avi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/18/06 5:54 AM Replace ProxyPass http://tswwma.lib.loc.gov/ http://192.168.0.2/ ProxyPassReverse http://tswwma.lib.loc.gov/ http://192.168.0.2/ with ProxyPass/ http://192.168.0.2/ ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.0.2/ -ascs -Original Message- From: Avraham Shapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 8:48 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverse on Windows Importance: Low ** Low Priority ** Brian I read the applicable part of the doc and tried ProxyPassReverse with and without dns names and with and without the proxy section but I still can't get reverse proxy to work. When I fire up my browser I always get the local Apache server. Here's the relevant part of my httpd.conf: == ServerName tswwma.lib.loc.gov UseCanonicalName On ProxyRequests Off Proxy * Order deny,allow Allow from all /Proxy ProxyPass http://tswwma.lib.loc.gov/ http://192.168.0.2/ ProxyPassReverse http://tswwma.lib.loc.gov/ http://192.168.0.2/ = There's nothing in my error log when I use a domain name and proxy section. as abpve. But when I omit them it actually seems to come close to executing the proxy. Then I get the following in error.log: [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [notice] Apache/2.2.2 (Win32) configured -- resuming normal operations [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [notice] Server built: Apr 29 2006 18:32:31 [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [notice] Parent: Created child process 588 [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [debug] mpm_winnt.c(481): Parent: Sent the scoreboard to the child [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [notice] Child 588: Child process is running [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [debug] mpm_winnt.c(402): Child 588: Retrieved our sc oreboard from the parent. [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [info] Parent: Duplicating socket 208 and sending it to child process 588 [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [debug] mpm_winnt.c(599): Parent: Sent 1 listeners to child 588 [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [debug] mpm_winnt.c(558): Child 588: retrieved 1 list eners from parent [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1625): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 588 for worker http://192.168.0.2/ [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1708): proxy: initialized worker 0 in child 588 for (192.168.0.2) min=0 max=250 smax=250 [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1625): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 1 in child 588 for worker proxy:reverse [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1708): proxy: initialized worker 1 in child 588 for (*) min=0 max=250 smax=250 [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [notice] Child 588: Acquired the start mutex. [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [notice] Child 588: Starting 250 worker threads. [Tue May 16 15:30:15 2006] [notice] Child 588: Starting thread to listen on port 80. It seems to be attempting the reverse proxy but fails. I noticed someone else in the mail list using VirtualHost to do ProxyPassReverse. But I didn't see the doc instructing me to do it that way. Also, I don't remember the scoreboard, which is prominent in the log, being discussed in the docs. BTW if I didn't already mention it, this is 2.2. Any ideas? Thanks in advance! Avi Brian Rectanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/16/06 11:31 AM On 5/16/06, Avraham Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Low Priority ** I loaded mod_proxy, and it no longer complains about the ProxyPassReverse line. But when I open http://localhost in my browser the reverse proxy doesn't happen. Instead it says can't find server.
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url reformat - howto
Brian Rectanus wrote: What you had will strip the mydir off at the backend. ProxyRequests off ProxyPass /mydir/ http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir/ -B On 5/18/06, Oliver A. Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Krist van Besien wrote: On 5/18/06, Oliver A. Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all! Im running Java pages on my server. Basically, all pages will have a direct url like http://mydomain.com:8080/mydir What I did is for user not to type a long url by simply typing the normal domain such as http://www.mydomain.com and redirecting to http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir. What appears to be my problem is how to avoid the whole http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir url appear on the browser which is when I type in the absolute domain, http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir url will just map into http://www.mydomain.com which will eventually appear on the client's browser. This is what happens when you do a redirect: - Browser requests http://www.mydomain.com - Server answers with I don't have this, but try http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir in stead. - Browser requests http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir And for this reason the new URL apears on the adress line of the browser. This is by design. If you want to hide the fact that resources are not where they apear to be you need to use reverse proxying, not redirection. Krist Ok what I did is: ProxyRequests off ProxyPass /mydir http://www.mydomain.com:8080 But it didn't worked at all -- Oliver A. Rojo __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ok this is my whole config... VirtualHost 69.16.199.98 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /var/www/html ServerName mydomain.com.com ServerAlias www ProxyRequests off ProxyPass /mydir http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/ ErrorLog logs/mydomain.com-error_log CustomLog logs/mydomain.com-access_log combined /VirtualHost Still not workin'. By the way, what will be the content of my index.html? thanks again! -- Oliver A. Rojo __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules
I had a similiar problem with the mod_proxy modules, but even specifiying these modules during the ./configure phase did not work properly for me. Try this: cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *.c R. --- JP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. My question is: Is there a proper method to adding delivered modules to httpd 2.2.2 after the initial run of configure, make, and install? That is, should I be able to use apxs to add modules, as DSOs, after the initial build, or should I be using configure to compile and add them? I'm using AIX 5.2ML7, C for AIX 5.2.0.9. Initially, I'd like to build httpd to use all shared objects, so I used this configure command: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --with-ssl=/usr/linux --enable-mods-shared=all --disable-deflate --without-berkeley-db Later, I tried to add mod_proxy, and mod_proxy_ajp using apxs: executed from $source_dir/modules/proxy apxs -i -a -c mod_proxy.c apxs -i -a -c mod_proxy_ajp.c They compiled and seemed to build/install correctly, but I got the following error when testing the config: /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -t httpd: Syntax error on line 102 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/apache/modules/mod_proxy.so into server: rtld: 0712-001 Symbol ap_proxy_lb_workers was referenced\n from module /usr/local/apache/modules/mod_proxy.so(), but a runtime definition\n of the symbol was not found. ... So, I eventually found the problem was that a library, proxy_util, was not being linked into mod_proxy.so by the apxs commands I used. It turns out that if the proxy modules are specified explicitly in the configure command, then the build is performed correctly. It occurred to me that maybe apxs is doing exactly what I told it to, and that I might be left up to the user to sort out dependencies. If I'm missing a flag or something in the apxs command, please let me know. Thanks for your help, JP - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hacked Web Site
--- Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I would tend to agree with you, except for the fact that the 3 sites did not use any SQL, they were all simple html sites with very little content. I did find something that referenced hidden field injections as well, but again, none of the sites had hidden fields. This is why I am puzzled as to what could be going on here. I wasn't looking at the sites you arehosting, I was looking at the 3000+ sites listed as being hacked by them. Most of them are database driven sites, making sql injection the most propable vector. for static html, apache configuration for the hosting server will very much dictate what happened and how, the server logs for the time the hack happened will contain a lot of data to point you at where they found entry to hack the site. The error log to show the fails, the access log to show sucessful traffic, look for ip numbers in the error log that are requesting action that is not appropriate, then look in the access log for the same ones. this will show what they tried, and how they succeded. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rotatelogs and rewriteLog
Hello everyone, Is it possible to use rotatelogs with a rewriteLog on a Windows OS? If so, how. TIA - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rotatelogs and rewriteLog
On 5/19/06, Browne, Anthony A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, Is it possible to use rotatelogs with a rewriteLog on a Windows OS? If so, how. I've never tried it, but I don't believe this is possible. But you shouldn't need to rotate the RewriteLog. This should be used for debugging only. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rotatelogs and rewriteLog
It didn't appear to be possible when I tried it, but I was wondering if someone knew a way to do it. We need to use the rewriteLog if our customers, who will use a gui to change the verbosity, experience problems. Our goal was to rotate the logs when they reached a certain size so they could be compressed and sent to us for analysis. Also, if they get too big, the gui takes a long time to load them into the log viewer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 10:47 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rotatelogs and rewriteLog On 5/19/06, Browne, Anthony A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, Is it possible to use rotatelogs with a rewriteLog on a Windows OS? If so, how. I've never tried it, but I don't believe this is possible. But you shouldn't need to rotate the RewriteLog. This should be used for debugging only. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules
Ok, how about cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *proxy*.c I know I got it to work using some sort of wildcards. I'll try to see if I can find it back in my shell's history. --- JP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a similiar problem with the mod_proxy modules, but even specifiying these modules during the ./configure phase did not work properly for me. Try this: cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *.c R. Hey. Here's what I get: Put apxs in PATH. cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apxs -i -a -c *.c /usr/local/apache/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -prefer-pic -U__STR__ -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_USE_IRS -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -g -qHALT=E -I/usr/local/apache/include -I/usr/local/apache/include -I/usr/local/apache/include -c -o ajp_header.lo ajp_header.c touch ajp_header.slo ... /usr/local/apache/build/libtool --silent --mode=link cc -o ajp_header.la -rpath /usr/local/apache/modules -module -avoid-version -Wl,-brtl proxy_util.lo mod_proxy_http.lo mod_proxy_ftp.lo mod_proxy_connect.lo mod_proxy_balancer.lo mod_proxy_ajp.lo mod_proxy.lo ajp_msg.lo ajp_link.lo ajp_header.lo apxs:Error: Sorry, cannot determine bootstrap symbol name. apxs:Error: Please specify one with option `-n'. I think it's hanging up on the libraries that aren't modules themselves like proxy_util, ajp_msg, etc. JP - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6
We are now using Apache 1.3.31 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on Unix. We want to upgrade the Apache to 2.0. Just wondering if anyone has done this, or if this will cause problems with Tomcat. Thanks Colleen
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6
Colleen, I strongly recommend going straight to Apache 2.2 and Tomcat 5.5. You can get rid of the (in my opinion horrible) mod_jk setups and all the tricky stuff involved with setting up Tomcat connectors. Over the past 4 years of working with Apache and Tomcat, I wasted 2 days getting Apache 1.3 to talk to Tomcat 3, 1 day getting Apache 2.0 on Unix to talk to Tomcat 4 (never did get it to work in Windows). It only took about an hour to connect Apache 2.2 to Tomcat 5.5 . Tomcat 5.5 also supports separate files to configure each webapp instead of glomming it all in server.xml, a huge win for the configuration management and risk management camps. Bill From: Colleen Cubitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 11:00 AMTo: users@httpd.apache.orgSubject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6 We are now using Apache 1.3.31 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on Unix. We want to upgrade the Apache to 2.0. Just wondering if anyone has done this, or if this will cause problems with Tomcat. Thanks Colleen
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6
Tribley William-cwt010 wrote: It only took about an hour to connect Apache 2.2 to Tomcat 5.5 . Tomcat 5.5 also supports separate files to configure each webapp instead of glomming it all in server.xml, a huge win for the configuration management and risk management camps. Bill ** One hour ??? How about 5 minutes. If you compile and enable mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp, you then simply add a one line to your config like below, and you have apache talking to tomcat !!! ProxyPass /servlets-examples ajp://127.0.0.1:8009/servlets-examples My .02... -- °(((=((===°°°(((=== begin:vcard fn:Ricardo Stella n:Stella;Ricardo org:Rider University adr;dom:;;2083 Lawrenceville Rd;Lawrenceville;NJ;08648 version:2.1 end:vcard - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules
Ok, how about cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *proxy*.c That compiles, but produces the symbol resolution error at runtime. I was wondering if I am missing something obvious. The docs say to use apxs to compile modules outside of the source tree, so I was wondering if one is only supposed to use configure to compile modules that are delivered (inside the source tree). Or, maybe there's an issue with apxs. I was thinking on filing a bug report, but wanted to ask some more experienced users about this before doing that. Thanks for your help, JP - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6
Hi Ricardo, You are right. I was thinking that if you are used to the Apache 1.3 world and have to read the new material on 2.2, Tomcat 5.5 and the way they connect, then install and test it, an hour will go by. Frankly I was amazed at how easy it was. I am a big Apache 2.2/Tomcat 5.5 fan. In my opinion, this is the first combo that you can install really easily and administer without being a semi-expert. Bill -Original Message- From: Ricardo Stella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 11:27 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6 Tribley William-cwt010 wrote: It only took about an hour to connect Apache 2.2 to Tomcat 5.5 . Tomcat 5.5 also supports separate files to configure each webapp instead of glomming it all in server.xml, a huge win for the configuration management and risk management camps. Bill -- -- ** One hour ??? How about 5 minutes. If you compile and enable mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp, you then simply add a one line to your config like below, and you have apache talking to tomcat !!! ProxyPass /servlets-examples ajp://127.0.0.1:8009/servlets-examples My .02... -- °(((=((===°°°(((=== - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url reformat - howto
On 5/19/06, Oliver A. Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok this is my whole config... VirtualHost 69.16.199.98 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /var/www/html ServerName mydomain.com.com ServerAlias www ProxyRequests off ProxyPass /mydir http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/ ErrorLog logs/mydomain.com-error_log CustomLog logs/mydomain.com-access_log combined /VirtualHost You ought to use ProxyPass /mydir/ http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/ (Mind the slashes). Make sure that http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/whatever works, before you use http://mydomain.com/mydir/whatever Furthermore you might have made an error in configuring your virtual host. Still not workin'. By the way, what will be the content of my index.html? thanks again! The content of index.html will be whatever you put in in. Krist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Solothurn, Switzerland - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] piped log on Windows 2003 doesn't work
Hi,
I'm trying to use the piped log on Windows 2003 (apache httpd 2.2), but it
doesn't work. I tried it out on linux and it works great. My log.exe
program is called 5 times when server starts, and were not killed after
server stops. And my log.exe program doesn't seem to capture the logs. My
log.exe is as simple as this:
while (cin) {
cin.getline(buf, MAX_BUF_SIZE);
if (!cin) {
break;
} else {
fprintf(file, %s\n, buf);
fflush(file);
}
}
Can anyone help? Thanks.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache
Is there a better list to use for questions about core modules? I'm using mod_cache on Apache 2.0.55 (Debian Sid) with the following config: ProxyViaOn CacheRoot /var/cache/apache2/proxy CacheSize 1000 CacheMaxExpire 300 CacheIgnoreHeaders Set-Cookie ProxyReceiveBufferSize 16384 CacheEnable disk / proxy * allow from all /proxy And I'm using a reverse proxy to connect to the back end machine. The back end machine provides Last-Modified, Expires, and Cache-Control headers. When I first start up Apache files are cached. But, once they expire then they are no longer cached and *always* fetch from the back end server. It's as if the front end mod_cache server is not updating it's Expires date. Maybe I don't understand CacheMaxExpire setting?? For example here's two requests that were handled by the cache (note the Age: header. The back end server was not accessed for these requests. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/WS2$ HEAD http://bumby:82/css/style.css 200 OK Cache-Control: max-age=300 Connection: close Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:35:57 GMT Via: 1.1 localhost:82 Age: 223 Server: Apache/2.0.55 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.0.55 OpenSSL/0.9.8a Content-Length: 2264 Content-Type: text/css Expires: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:37:14 GMT Last-Modified: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:59:44 GMT Client-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:35:57 GMT Client-Peer: 192.168.1.2:82 Client-Response-Num: 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/WS2$ date -u Fri May 19 20:36:19 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/WS2$ HEAD http://bumby:82/css/style.css 200 OK Cache-Control: max-age=300 Connection: close Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:36:21 GMT Via: 1.1 localhost:82 Age: 247 Server: Apache/2.0.55 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.0.55 OpenSSL/0.9.8a Content-Length: 2264 Content-Type: text/css Expires: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:37:14 GMT Last-Modified: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:59:44 GMT Client-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:36:21 GMT Client-Peer: 192.168.1.2:82 Client-Response-Num: 1 Now, once it got to 300 seconds the front-end server (running mod_cache) *always* fetches the document from the back-end server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/WS2$ HEAD http://bumby:82/css/style.css 200 OK Cache-Control: max-age=300 Connection: close Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:37:41 GMT Via: 1.1 localhost:82 Server: Apache/2.0.55 (Debian) mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8 Content-Length: 2264 Content-Type: text/css Expires: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:42:41 GMT Last-Modified: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:59:44 GMT Client-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:37:42 GMT Client-Peer: 192.168.1.2:82 Client-Response-Num: 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/WS2$ HEAD http://bumby:82/css/style.css 200 OK Cache-Control: max-age=300 Connection: close Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:37:47 GMT Via: 1.1 localhost:82 Server: Apache/2.0.55 (Debian) mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8 Content-Length: 2264 Content-Type: text/css Expires: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:42:47 GMT Last-Modified: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:59:44 GMT Client-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:37:47 GMT Client-Peer: 192.168.1.2:82 Client-Response-Num: 1 Note that the back-end server returns both Cache-Control and Expires headers without regard to http/1.0 vs http/1.1. Not sure if that might be a problem or not. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] piped log on Windows 2003 doesn't work
Have you enabled some exception handling that would bypass exceptions
on cin? cin should be closed on the write end of the pipe, before or
as the parent process exits. The only way this would fail is if somehow
the write end of the pipe is inhereted by the child process.
Launching your program 5x isn't a bug, depending on your config. Both
the parent process and child process will launch during startup. That
behavior is unique to windows because child isn't forked.
Bill
DEBIN GAO wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the piped log on Windows 2003 (apache httpd 2.2), but
it doesn't work. I tried it out on linux and it works great. My
log.exe program is called 5 times when server starts, and were not
killed after server stops. And my log.exe program doesn't seem to
capture the logs. My log.exe is as simple as this:
while (cin) {
cin.getline(buf, MAX_BUF_SIZE);
if (!cin) {
break;
} else {
fprintf(file, %s\n, buf);
fflush(file);
}
}
Can anyone help? Thanks.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (c lient socket)
I've spent hours googling and asked about this error message on a PHP list and was directed here. Every time I gracefully restart Apache 2.2.2, the error log reports: [Thu May 18 19:59:29 2006] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Thu May 18 19:59:29 2006] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket) [Thu May 18 19:59:30 2006] [notice] Apache configured -- resuming normal operations [Thu May 18 19:59:30 2006] [warn] long lost child came home! (pid 2881) On rare occasion, Apache 2.2.2 is crashing with: [Fri May 19 17:29:05 2006] [notice] child pid 11243 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) (Long list, all the child pids different of course.) I've searched the bug list and found nothing for apr_socket_accept. From googling, I've found messages about errors with apr_socket_accept in very old versions of Apache, but none seemed helpful. Since I see client socket, it certainly sounds like it's an interaction with something else that's causing the problem, but I don't know how to determine what that something else is. I could include my strace, but it's long and I'm not a progammer so I can't really get anywhere with it. I get the same error even if I take out the only external module I use (PHP5.1.4). I've tried using a totally stripped-down version of httpd.conf as well, with the same results. I've tried building Apache without some of the standard modules, with the same results. (The list of modules is below.) It seems possibly related to my operating/build environment: gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13) ReiserFS on (software) RAID-1 Linux version 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic Debian Stable dmesg reports no file system errors. I did reboot the system once, and ReiserFS reported no problems. The only thing left that I can think of is to bring down the server and run reiserfsck. It's a production server, so I very much dislike doing it unless someone believes that this error points towards the file system. Any suggestions appreciated. Thank you, Jeff Hill # apachectl -l core.c mod_authn_file.c mod_authn_default.c mod_authz_host.c mod_authz_groupfile.c mod_authz_user.c mod_authz_default.c mod_auth_basic.c mod_cache.c mod_mem_cache.c mod_include.c mod_filter.c mod_deflate.c mod_log_config.c mod_env.c mod_usertrack.c mod_setenvif.c mod_ssl.c prefork.c http_core.c mod_mime.c mod_status.c mod_autoindex.c mod_asis.c mod_info.c mod_cgi.c mod_negotiation.c mod_dir.c mod_actions.c mod_speling.c mod_userdir.c mod_alias.c mod_rewrite.c mod_so.c - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] piped log on Windows 2003 doesn't work
Thanks for the reply.
The same log.exe works well in accepting inputs in, e.g., dir | log, so I
don't see why it would fail when launched by httpd.
As far as I know, httpd on windows is multi-threaded, meaning there is only
one child that creates all the threads to handle requests. (There should be
another parent child, which doesn't create threads.) So are you saying that
each thread launched its own log.exe process? Doesn't sound right to me...
Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
Debin
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:24 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] piped log on Windows 2003 doesn't work
Have you enabled some exception handling that would bypass exceptions
on cin? cin should be closed on the write end of the pipe, before or
as the parent process exits. The only way this would fail is if somehow
the write end of the pipe is inhereted by the child process.
Launching your program 5x isn't a bug, depending on your config. Both
the parent process and child process will launch during startup. That
behavior is unique to windows because child isn't forked.
Bill
DEBIN GAO wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the piped log on Windows 2003 (apache httpd 2.2), but
it doesn't work. I tried it out on linux and it works great. My
log.exe program is called 5 times when server starts, and were not
killed after server stops. And my log.exe program doesn't seem to
capture the logs. My log.exe is as simple as this:
while (cin) {
cin.getline(buf, MAX_BUF_SIZE);
if (!cin) {
break;
} else {
fprintf(file, %s\n, buf);
fflush(file);
}
}
Can anyone help? Thanks.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache
On 5/19/06, Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a better list to use for questions about core modules? Nope. This is the one. When I first start up Apache files are cached. But, once they expire then they are no longer cached and *always* fetch from the back end server. It's as if the front end mod_cache server is not updating it's Expires date. I can't directly help you, but you should note two things: 1. mod_disk_cache is vastly improved in 2.2 over 2.0. You should really upgrade, since it is likely you are hitting a bug in 2.0 that is fixed in 2.2. 2. Try setting LogLevel to debug to get more information about mod_cache actions. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Is Apache mod_aspdotnet alive?
Thanks Vic Feria and William Rowe. Vic Feria wrote: I think they have a windows version Can you please point me to the windows version. I know of XSP on Windows and not mod_mono on Windows. And William Rowe wrote: Tope Akinniyi wrote: and does not run on Windows platform. Huh? Since when? I hope you are not confusing XSP with mod_mono. MONO XSP exists for Windows, that I know. I will appreciate you giving me the link or the binary of mod_mono for Windows. Regards. Tope. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Is Apache mod_aspdotnet alive?
The link to mod_mono for Windows is http://dev.anmar.eu.org/mono/mod_mono/ . Currently, though , it only appears to work with the Apache 2.0.x distribution. -Wraith Oluwatope Akinniyi wrote: Thanks Vic Feria and William Rowe. Vic Feria wrote: I think they have a windows version Can you please point me to the windows version. I know of XSP on Windows and not mod_mono on Windows. And William Rowe wrote: Tope Akinniyi wrote: and does not run on Windows platform. Huh? Since when? I hope you are not confusing XSP with mod_mono. MONO XSP exists for Windows, that I know. I will appreciate you giving me the link or the binary of mod_mono for Windows. Regards. Tope. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] AddType application/x-httpd-php behaves wrong in Mozilla/Ubuntu
After upgrading to the latest Apache and PHP on a server running FreeBSD 6.0-release, I find that the AddType application/x-httpd-php .php line in httpd.conf is working everywhere except for *one* virtual host, accessed by *a single* browser. In other words, every v-host works as it always did from every browser on every computer in the house (including Firefox on Ubuntu and Mozilla in XP), except that when I open Mozilla 1.7.13 under Ubuntu 5.10 and try to access http://www.hirstory.com:2170/ (one of many v-hosts on the server machine) it tells me: the file is of type application/x-httpd-php and Mozilla does not know how to handle this file ... The strange thing is, typing http://www.hirstory.com:2170/index.php works fine. Whatever causes this particular browser's request to confuse Apache, it happens while the index is being located. This doesn't happen with other virtual hosts under the same server that also have index.php and have no problems, nor does it happen when you change the browser or the OS. Any thoughts on why this could be? Many thanks, Jordan - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules
Hi, This was with an older version of Apache (2.0.52), but I just did this this week to compile the mod_proxy modules on Solaris: cd source/modules/proxy apxs -i -a -c *.c Jim JP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, how about cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *proxy*.c That compiles, but produces the symbol resolution error at runtime. I was wondering if I am missing something obvious. The docs say to use apxs to compile modules outside of the source tree, so I was wondering if one is only supposed to use configure to compile modules that are delivered (inside the source tree). Or, maybe there's an issue with apxs. I was thinking on filing a bug report, but wanted to ask some more experienced users about this before doing that. Thanks for your help, JP - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: AddType application/x-httpd-php behaves wrong in Mozilla/Ubuntu [solved]
Oops, sorry! The problem was solved when I cleared Mozilla's cache, since I had been troubleshooting earlier ... too late to prevent wasting your time, I'm afraid. Thanks anyway! Jordan On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After upgrading to the latest Apache and PHP on a server running FreeBSD 6.0-release, I find that the AddType application/x-httpd-php .php line in httpd.conf is working everywhere except for *one* virtual host, accessed by *a single* browser. In other words, every v-host works as it always did from every browser on every computer in the house (including Firefox on Ubuntu and Mozilla in XP), except that when I open Mozilla 1.7.13 under Ubuntu 5.10 and try to access http://www.hirstory.com:2170/ (one of many v-hosts on the server machine) it tells me: the file is of type application/x-httpd-php and Mozilla does not know how to handle this file ... The strange thing is, typing http://www.hirstory.com:2170/index.php works fine. Whatever causes this particular browser's request to confuse Apache, it happens while the index is being located. This doesn't happen with other virtual hosts under the same server that also have index.php and have no problems, nor does it happen when you change the browser or the OS. Any thoughts on why this could be? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuration given in online manual for php not working
Hi, I am trying to use apache httpd 2.2 and php 5.1.4.4 on windows xp. the php was manually installed in c:/php when I add the following to httpd.conf (as given in online manual: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.apache2.php): # # For PHP 5 do something like this: LoadModule php5_module c:/php/php5apache2.dll AddType application/x-httpd-php .php # configure the path to php.ini PHPIniDir c:/php the apache server service does not start (if I try using the apache monitor stop/staRT it says ther requested opeartion has failed). THere is no error message in the log to indicate why. Removing the above allows the service to start. the file for the loadmodule and ini have correct paths as shown above. any ideas? thanks, chris - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url reformat - howto
Argh, this was supposed to go to the list, too... From: Brian Rectanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: May 19, 2006 9:14 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url reformat - howto To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, that is wrong, too: ProxyPass /mydir http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/ should be: ProxyPass /mydir/ http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/ The paths should match up as one is replaced by the other. Otherwise requests will be routed as: http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir//foo/bar.html Now, when you go to: http://mydomain.com.com/mydir/foo/bar.html it will get reverse proxied to: http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/foo/bar.html provided that it is actually getting to that virtual host in the first place :) When you say it does not work, what do you mean? Are you getting an error? What error? Have you checked logs/mydomain.com-access_log to see if it was served by that virtual host? Have you checked access logs on www.domain.com:8080 to see if it got there? Have you checked your error logs? What are the HTTP headers coming back to the browser? Perhaps there is another redirect in there and then you will need an additional line after the ProxyPass line: ProxyPassReverse /mydir/ http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/ Are you trying to reverse proxy to the same machine? If so, why? Why don't you just listen to port 80 for your java pages? -B On 5/19/06, Oliver A. Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brian Rectanus wrote: What you had will strip the mydir off at the backend. ProxyRequests off ProxyPass /mydir/ http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir/ -B On 5/18/06, Oliver A. Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Krist van Besien wrote: On 5/18/06, Oliver A. Rojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all! Im running Java pages on my server. Basically, all pages will have a direct url like http://mydomain.com:8080/mydir What I did is for user not to type a long url by simply typing the normal domain such as http://www.mydomain.com and redirecting to http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir. What appears to be my problem is how to avoid the whole http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir url appear on the browser which is when I type in the absolute domain, http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir url will just map into http://www.mydomain.com which will eventually appear on the client's browser. This is what happens when you do a redirect: - Browser requests http://www.mydomain.com - Server answers with I don't have this, but try http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir in stead. - Browser requests http://www.mydomain.com:8080/mydir And for this reason the new URL apears on the adress line of the browser. This is by design. If you want to hide the fact that resources are not where they apear to be you need to use reverse proxying, not redirection. Krist Ok what I did is: ProxyRequests off ProxyPass /mydir http://www.mydomain.com:8080 But it didn't worked at all -- Oliver A. Rojo __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ok this is my whole config... VirtualHost 69.16.199.98 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /var/www/html ServerName mydomain.com.com ServerAlias www ProxyRequests off ProxyPass /mydir http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/ ErrorLog logs/mydomain.com-error_log CustomLog logs/mydomain.com-access_log combined /VirtualHost Still not workin'. By the way, what will be the content of my index.html? thanks again! -- Oliver A. Rojo __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socke t_accept: (client socket)
Could you tell me a little more about your setup? Kernel, CPU (32-bit or 64-bit), filesystem (ReiserFS or ?), compiler version, etc.? Are you running 2.2.2? I'd really appreciate knowing. I'm digging into this, one way or another. If it were just an occassional error message, I might ignore it, but I usually get bitten at some point when I ignore repeated error messages. The other point, as I noted, is that on rare occassion the server crashes (once a month, maybe). I've been using Apache since 1996, about v.1.1. I haven't had a production version of Apache crash that often since about version 1.2. I've discovered numerous Apache bugs over the years, almost always reported by the time I found them, but this is unreported. It leads me to believe something more onerous is going on that is not Apache specific. Call me paranoid, but this is a production environment. I like my job; I've never been fired. I'd like to keep it that way. Again, I'd really appreciate any extra info on your system. When I find the answer, I promise I'll let you know, even if I have to pay programmers out of my own pocket to do it. Thanks again, Jeff On Fri, 19 May 2006 23:31:13 -0400, Brian Rectanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed this the other day. It happens whenever you stop the service as well. I have not dug any deeper into it, though. I am on RedHat AS3 and Apache 2.2.2. -B On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've spent hours googling and asked about this error message on a PHP list and was directed here. Every time I gracefully restart Apache 2.2.2, the error log reports: [Thu May 18 19:59:29 2006] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Thu May 18 19:59:29 2006] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket) [Thu May 18 19:59:30 2006] [notice] Apache configured -- resuming normal operations [Thu May 18 19:59:30 2006] [warn] long lost child came home! (pid 2881) On rare occasion, Apache 2.2.2 is crashing with: [Fri May 19 17:29:05 2006] [notice] child pid 11243 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) (Long list, all the child pids different of course.) I've searched the bug list and found nothing for apr_socket_accept. From googling, I've found messages about errors with apr_socket_accept in very old versions of Apache, but none seemed helpful. Since I see client socket, it certainly sounds like it's an interaction with something else that's causing the problem, but I don't know how to determine what that something else is. I could include my strace, but it's long and I'm not a progammer so I can't really get anywhere with it. I get the same error even if I take out the only external module I use (PHP5.1.4). I've tried using a totally stripped-down version of httpd.conf as well, with the same results. I've tried building Apache without some of the standard modules, with the same results. (The list of modules is below.) It seems possibly related to my operating/build environment: gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13) ReiserFS on (software) RAID-1 Linux version 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic Debian Stable dmesg reports no file system errors. I did reboot the system once, and ReiserFS reported no problems. The only thing left that I can think of is to bring down the server and run reiserfsck. It's a production server, so I very much dislike doing it unless someone believes that this error points towards the file system. Any suggestions appreciated. Thank you, Jeff Hill # apachectl -l core.c mod_authn_file.c mod_authn_default.c mod_authz_host.c mod_authz_groupfile.c mod_authz_user.c mod_authz_default.c mod_auth_basic.c mod_cache.c mod_mem_cache.c mod_include.c mod_filter.c mod_deflate.c mod_log_config.c mod_env.c mod_usertrack.c mod_setenvif.c mod_ssl.c prefork.c http_core.c mod_mime.c mod_status.c mod_autoindex.c mod_asis.c mod_info.c mod_cgi.c mod_negotiation.c mod_dir.c mod_actions.c mod_speling.c mod_userdir.c mod_alias.c mod_rewrite.c mod_so.c - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See
