RE: continuous integration server
I run an instance for TDD. I run another instance for build and release (proprietary maven plugins). I run another instance for delivery (more maven plugins). I then run metrics (yet more plugins) on two instances. All together I run 8 instances on 4 different machines. Works well for us and got us to CMMI level 4 while still working agile. -Original Message- From: Gregory Kick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 2:08 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server @Liz Just out of curiosity, why would you want to be running multiple instances? On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Sommers, Elizabeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use Vulcan. I like the fact that I can run multiple instances of it in the same tomcat. It also does everything I need in a CI server. http://code.google.com/p/vulcan/ Liz Sommers [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gregory Kick http://kickstyle.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
Matthew Tordoff wrote: Has anyone looked at Bamboo? We have used Bamboo for Mule for quite some time now. The setup seems to be easy (haven't done it) and the day to day operations are supported by the UI, too. The only (big) boo that came up in the whole time we used it was that Bamboo 1.x used to store the entire build log in memory before writing it out in XML at the end of the build. This caused frequent OOMs with our build as it can generate quite a bit of log output. This should be fixed with Bamboo 2.0 now. For my private pet projects I use Hudson and while Bamboo has some concepts that Hudson doesn't have (e.g. Build queues) I like Hudson's approach of extensibility by plugins, e.g. I use the findbugs plugin as part of the build and have Hudson pick up the XML files and render neat timelines of bug increase/decrease etc. -dirk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: continuous integration server
Has anyone looked at Bamboo? -Original Message- From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content of this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient and may not be disclosed, copied or distributed. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000, delete it and do not disclose its contents to any person. You should take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network. Markit and its affiliated companies make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby exclude any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com http://www.markit.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
i know that spring uses bamboo for it's builds and i can't remember the last time that i've actually seen it work... http://build.springframework.org:8085/ On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Tordoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone looked at Bamboo? -Original Message- From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content of this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient and may not be disclosed, copied or distributed. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000, delete it and do not disclose its contents to any person. You should take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network. Markit and its affiliated companies make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby exclude any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com http://www.markit.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gregory Kick http://kickstyle.net/ i kno - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
Just an FYI, bamboo 2.0 went live today. I've looked at both Continuum, Bamboo, Hudson, and Team City. I've hit some weird issues with Hudson that I couldn't work out (note: the author was willing to lend a hand but I didn't have enough time) and had to just move on, but it built 4 out of 5 of my projects no problem. I'm currently playing with Bamboo and it seems to fit well for my needs. I would recommend giving each of them a few hours of play time and coming up with your own opinion, but ultimately I'm going with Bamboo (Team City would be my next choice followed closely by a revisit to Hudson). I definitely wasn't a fan of Continuum, but I also haven't looked at it in a while On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Matthew Tordoff wrote: Has anyone looked at Bamboo? -Original Message- From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content of this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient and may not be disclosed, copied or distributed. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000, delete it and do not disclose its contents to any person. You should take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network. Markit and its affiliated companies make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby exclude any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com http://www.markit.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: continuous integration server
We are currently using CruiseControl. I know it is the Granddaddy of them all in some ways, but it seems flexible in the builds. I like the way with CC that the config can be controlled in SVN, so that if someone wanted to recreate the installation they can check it out from SVN and away they go. Also the config.xml can be monitored as a build itself. The downsides I suppose are that the basic GUI isn't so flashy and while there is tool support for editing the config.xml I prefer to edit it by hand (perhaps that says more about me than CC...). I did write a plugin to integrate with our Nabaztag rabbit though which was easy to do. At the time (a year ago or so) I looked at Continuum and Hudson, and while both seemed quite good they were still in their infancy. Things may have changed so I would echo the comment from Jared about having a look around. Ben -Original Message- From: Jared Blitzstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 April 2008 16:50 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Just an FYI, bamboo 2.0 went live today. I've looked at both Continuum, Bamboo, Hudson, and Team City. I've hit some weird issues with Hudson that I couldn't work out (note: the author was willing to lend a hand but I didn't have enough time) and had to just move on, but it built 4 out of 5 of my projects no problem. I'm currently playing with Bamboo and it seems to fit well for my needs. I would recommend giving each of them a few hours of play time and coming up with your own opinion, but ultimately I'm going with Bamboo (Team City would be my next choice followed closely by a revisit to Hudson). I definitely wasn't a fan of Continuum, but I also haven't looked at it in a while On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Matthew Tordoff wrote: Has anyone looked at Bamboo? -Original Message- From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content of this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient and may not be disclosed, copied or distributed. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000, delete it and do not disclose its contents to any person. You should take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network. Markit and its affiliated companies make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby exclude any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com http://www.markit.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that any use, dissemination, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
We had used Continuum and had no problems with it for the most part until we came across a bug in our version (1.0.3) that we'd have had to upgrade to 1.1. We switched to Hudson at that point just based on ease of installation and it has been great for the time we've been using it so I say +1 for Hudson as well. On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Jared Blitzstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an FYI, bamboo 2.0 went live today. I've looked at both Continuum, Bamboo, Hudson, and Team City. I've hit some weird issues with Hudson that I couldn't work out (note: the author was willing to lend a hand but I didn't have enough time) and had to just move on, but it built 4 out of 5 of my projects no problem. I'm currently playing with Bamboo and it seems to fit well for my needs. I would recommend giving each of them a few hours of play time and coming up with your own opinion, but ultimately I'm going with Bamboo (Team City would be my next choice followed closely by a revisit to Hudson). I definitely wasn't a fan of Continuum, but I also haven't looked at it in a while On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Matthew Tordoff wrote: Has anyone looked at Bamboo? -Original Message- From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content of this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient and may not be disclosed, copied or distributed. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000, delete it and do not disclose its contents to any person. You should take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network. Markit and its affiliated companies make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby exclude any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com http://www.markit.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Adam Altemus MobilVox, Inc. http://www.mobilvox.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
The ease of installing Hudson was unbelievable, especially the test drive. I want to elaborate on my statement a little bit, I looked at Continuum and Hudson late last year and haven't used them since (though I tried to give Hudson another spin 3 weeks ago and got some null pointers right off the bat). I looked at Team City 3 and Bamboo (2 beta) last week and the push to use one over the other was that we already use a few Atlassian products at my job. They were both quality products and seem robust, but the ease of Hudson makes it very appealing as well. On Apr 15, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Adam wrote: We had used Continuum and had no problems with it for the most part until we came across a bug in our version (1.0.3) that we'd have had to upgrade to 1.1. We switched to Hudson at that point just based on ease of installation and it has been great for the time we've been using it so I say +1 for Hudson as well. On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Jared Blitzstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an FYI, bamboo 2.0 went live today. I've looked at both Continuum, Bamboo, Hudson, and Team City. I've hit some weird issues with Hudson that I couldn't work out (note: the author was willing to lend a hand but I didn't have enough time) and had to just move on, but it built 4 out of 5 of my projects no problem. I'm currently playing with Bamboo and it seems to fit well for my needs. I would recommend giving each of them a few hours of play time and coming up with your own opinion, but ultimately I'm going with Bamboo (Team City would be my next choice followed closely by a revisit to Hudson). I definitely wasn't a fan of Continuum, but I also haven't looked at it in a while On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Matthew Tordoff wrote: Has anyone looked at Bamboo? -Original Message- From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content of this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient and may not be disclosed, copied or distributed. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000, delete it and do not disclose its contents to any person. You should take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network. Markit and its affiliated companies make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby exclude any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com http://www.markit.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Adam Altemus MobilVox, Inc. http://www.mobilvox.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: continuous integration server
I use Vulcan. I like the fact that I can run multiple instances of it in the same tomcat. It also does everything I need in a CI server. http://code.google.com/p/vulcan/ Liz Sommers [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
@Liz Just out of curiosity, why would you want to be running multiple instances? On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Sommers, Elizabeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use Vulcan. I like the fact that I can run multiple instances of it in the same tomcat. It also does everything I need in a CI server. http://code.google.com/p/vulcan/ Liz Sommers [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gregory Kick http://kickstyle.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: continuous integration server
We use QuickBuild, which is the professional version of Luntbuild, for Maven. The experience has been pleasant, was wondering if anyone else has used either? -Original Message- From: Jared Blitzstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 12:15 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server The ease of installing Hudson was unbelievable, especially the test drive. I want to elaborate on my statement a little bit, I looked at Continuum and Hudson late last year and haven't used them since (though I tried to give Hudson another spin 3 weeks ago and got some null pointers right off the bat). I looked at Team City 3 and Bamboo (2 beta) last week and the push to use one over the other was that we already use a few Atlassian products at my job. They were both quality products and seem robust, but the ease of Hudson makes it very appealing as well. On Apr 15, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Adam wrote: We had used Continuum and had no problems with it for the most part until we came across a bug in our version (1.0.3) that we'd have had to upgrade to 1.1. We switched to Hudson at that point just based on ease of installation and it has been great for the time we've been using it so I say +1 for Hudson as well. On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Jared Blitzstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an FYI, bamboo 2.0 went live today. I've looked at both Continuum, Bamboo, Hudson, and Team City. I've hit some weird issues with Hudson that I couldn't work out (note: the author was willing to lend a hand but I didn't have enough time) and had to just move on, but it built 4 out of 5 of my projects no problem. I'm currently playing with Bamboo and it seems to fit well for my needs. I would recommend giving each of them a few hours of play time and coming up with your own opinion, but ultimately I'm going with Bamboo (Team City would be my next choice followed closely by a revisit to Hudson). I definitely wasn't a fan of Continuum, but I also haven't looked at it in a while On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Matthew Tordoff wrote: Has anyone looked at Bamboo? -Original Message- From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content of this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient and may not be disclosed, copied or distributed. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000, delete it and do not disclose its contents to any person. You should take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network. Markit and its affiliated companies make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby exclude any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com http://www.markit.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Adam Altemus MobilVox, Inc. http://www.mobilvox.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: continuous integration server
We also use quickbuild and we do an end to end build automation using this. It starts from tagging to compilation, packaging, moving deliverables to release area, creation of release notes and pushing the same in wiki format, auto deployment in staging environments, automated testing and effective communication. Regards, Mayank -Original Message- From: Prystash,John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:17 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: RE: continuous integration server We use QuickBuild, which is the professional version of Luntbuild, for Maven. The experience has been pleasant, was wondering if anyone else has used either? -Original Message- From: Jared Blitzstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 12:15 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server The ease of installing Hudson was unbelievable, especially the test drive. I want to elaborate on my statement a little bit, I looked at Continuum and Hudson late last year and haven't used them since (though I tried to give Hudson another spin 3 weeks ago and got some null pointers right off the bat). I looked at Team City 3 and Bamboo (2 beta) last week and the push to use one over the other was that we already use a few Atlassian products at my job. They were both quality products and seem robust, but the ease of Hudson makes it very appealing as well. On Apr 15, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Adam wrote: We had used Continuum and had no problems with it for the most part until we came across a bug in our version (1.0.3) that we'd have had to upgrade to 1.1. We switched to Hudson at that point just based on ease of installation and it has been great for the time we've been using it so I say +1 for Hudson as well. On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Jared Blitzstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an FYI, bamboo 2.0 went live today. I've looked at both Continuum, Bamboo, Hudson, and Team City. I've hit some weird issues with Hudson that I couldn't work out (note: the author was willing to lend a hand but I didn't have enough time) and had to just move on, but it built 4 out of 5 of my projects no problem. I'm currently playing with Bamboo and it seems to fit well for my needs. I would recommend giving each of them a few hours of play time and coming up with your own opinion, but ultimately I'm going with Bamboo (Team City would be my next choice followed closely by a revisit to Hudson). I definitely wasn't a fan of Continuum, but I also haven't looked at it in a while On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Matthew Tordoff wrote: Has anyone looked at Bamboo? -Original Message- From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content of this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient and may not be disclosed, copied or distributed. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000, delete it and do not disclose its contents to any person. You should take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network. Markit and its affiliated companies make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby exclude any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com http://www.markit.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Adam Altemus MobilVox, Inc. http://www.mobilvox.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: continuous integration server
Springs Bamboo seems to be working fine :) James On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 10:50 -0500, Gregory Kick wrote: i know that spring uses bamboo for it's builds and i can't remember the last time that i've actually seen it work... http://build.springframework.org:8085/ On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Tordoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone looked at Bamboo? -Original Message- From: Tom Huybrechts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2008 13:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: continuous integration server Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content of this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient and may not be disclosed, copied or distributed. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000, delete it and do not disclose its contents to any person. You should take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network. Markit and its affiliated companies make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby exclude any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com http://www.markit.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) We have been using CruiseControl (since July 2007), some of the other CI tools weren't really ready then. There are lots of things that I would like to have but just getting CI up and running is more important. Some things you may want to consider: * If Project B depends on Project A and A is rebuilt, does B get rebuilt? * If B and A are in the list of projects to get rebuilt, is A rebuilt first to avoid false build failures on B (because the changes in A are not yet available) * Trend analysis (having just looked at hudson this appears to do what I want and is quite nice) As someone suggested, your probably going to have to invest some time and play with these tools and come to your own conclusion. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
could you tell me your reason why you prefer hudson? Thanks, Peter
Re: continuous integration server
+1 on hudson netbeans.org is using it as well at http://deadlock.netbeans.org/hudson Milos On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Tom Huybrechts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hudson, without a doubt. See https://hudson.dev.java.net/ or a live instance at http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/ On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
Hudson. It just works. Kohsuke is dedicated, releases often and the community is thriving. With clients we have seen everything, and tried everything and Hudson has proven to the most reliable, easiest to setup, and the hardest to knock down. It just uses the file system, no databases or external resources as such it is simple which allows it to easily support multi-node setups. On 13-Apr-08, at 4:36 AM, Peter Horlock wrote: Hi, Which continuous integration server would you recommend me? Continuum? Or is there also a version by sonatype in the making?! :-) Thanks in advance, Peter Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com -- We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth. -- Unknown - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
Kohsuke keeps it simple, yet very powerful. You can have Hudson installed and your first build running within minutes. If you need customization, it is also incredibly easy to extend via plugins. Just try it, you'll never look back... On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: could you tell me your reason why you prefer hudson? Thanks, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
How about handling of maven2 project releases? Does it integrate nicely with the release plugin? And also, one point of concern is the security and roles management (who can deploy/force builds/release per project? I have been using Continuum for about a year without too many issues and it deals with all that nicely, does Hudson provide those features? Reading from the doc links below, it appeared to me Hudson was less well integrated for Maven 2 projects? Am I wrong? -Olivier On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:34 +0200, Tom Huybrechts wrote: Kohsuke keeps it simple, yet very powerful. You can have Hudson installed and your first build running within minutes. If you need customization, it is also incredibly easy to extend via plugins. Just try it, you'll never look back... On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: could you tell me your reason why you prefer hudson? Thanks, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuous integration server
On 13-Apr-08, at 8:52 AM, Olivier Dehon wrote: How about handling of maven2 project releases? Does it integrate nicely with the release plugin? There's nothing magical about configuring Hudson to fire off any set of plugins with any goals. We do on demand builds and releases with Hudson though this is more in the realm of a build server. We also don't use the release plugin across the board because it's doesn't work flawlessly with many SCMs other then subversion. So a lot of times I know our clients must roll something of their own and Hudson works great for this. And also, one point of concern is the security and roles management (who can deploy/force builds/release per project? There is authentication, but honestly I deal with some of the largest IT environments and they care more that it works. We've worked around any security concern putting Apache in front of it and use one of the security modules. But I know from talking with James Dumay that working with Redback is no great pleasure talking with him about his experiences in trying to plug Redback into Crowd. Generally using mod_authz_ldap with some groups and you can do what you need to do. That's not to say that rbac like control isn't a good thing to have but people prefer the general system work first, which Hudson does better then anything else IMO. I have been using Continuum for about a year without too many issues and it deals with all that nicely, does Hudson provide those features? Reading from the doc links below, it appeared to me Hudson was less well integrated for Maven 2 projects? Am I wrong? The Maven integration is so-so but that's changing everyday. I know from my vantage point Hudson is the only system I will provide commercial support for at Sonatype because the battle is over. Hudson won by making developers lives' easier. Kohsuke will go to no end to make things easier for users. He wrote a JNI tool so that people using ActiveDirectory wouldn't have to login all over the place. The other very cool thing was the use of Winstone in creating the easiest way to get a system up and running anyone has ever seen. These are the types of things Kohsuke will do and it brings other really good developers to the table. Tom is now doing some very cool things with Hudson for automated artifact promotion and Continuum certainly doesn't do that and if you ask a development organization if they wanted automated promotion models or security, they would take the automated promotion models. Along with all the other cool things in Hudson. Just that it has a real plugin model makes a world of difference because it truly is extensible like Maven. What's important is that it continues to work which is why people are flocking to Hudson. We actually use the freestyle builds with our Maven projects and though that takes a few minutes to setup in the long run it just works. At any rate I guarantee you that inside 3 months Hudson will have the best Maven integration of any CI/Build Server there is. -Olivier On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:34 +0200, Tom Huybrechts wrote: Kohsuke keeps it simple, yet very powerful. You can have Hudson installed and your first build running within minutes. If you need customization, it is also incredibly easy to extend via plugins. Just try it, you'll never look back... On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Peter Horlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: could you tell me your reason why you prefer hudson? Thanks, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com -- Selfish deeds are the shortest path to self destruction. -- The Seven Samuari, Akira Kirosawa - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
