Re: unit testing Tapestry Services (5.4)
The ApplicationStateManager is injected by TapestryModule.class you will either need to add this module to the registry or mock the service in a test module (eg using mockito). Or, you might choose to split your own module into smaller logical groups (eg core and web) for easier testing. You might also find the TapestryIOCJUnit4ClassRunner useful which is specifically designed to unit test tapestry-ioc services, examples here: https://github.com/apache/tapestry-5/blob/master/tapestry-ioc-junit/src/test/java/org/apache/tapestry5/ioc/junit/
unit testing Tapestry Services (5.4)
Hi All,
I'm trying to unit test services (these are already existing services) and
facing a few challenges. I have a ProjectService which extends a
baseService and this base service has another service which is injected
into it.
Interface IProjectService {
Event getEvents(Long key)
}
ProjectService extends BaseSerivce implements IProjectService {
getEvents(Long key) {
clientSession = getClientSession();
}
}
BaseService {
@Inject SessionService sessionService;
public ClientSession getClientSession() {
return sessionService.getClientSession();
}
}
// Test Code //
public class IProjectServiceTest {
protected static Registry registry;
@BeforeClass
public void beforeTest() {
registry = new RegistryBuilder().add(AppModule.class).build();
registry.performRegistryStartup();
}
@Test
public void getEvent() {
IProjectService projectService =
registry.getService(IProjectService.class);
Event event = projectService.getEvent(null);
Assert.assertEquals(event, null);
}
}
// End ///
I'm trying to test this using testng and when i try to run this i get an
exception in AppModule
FAILED CONFIGURATION: @BeforeClass beforeTest
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Contribution
.wp.services.AppModule.CacheManagerCreator(MappedConfiguration) (at
AppModule.java:260) is for service 'interface
org.apache.tapestry5.services.ApplicationStateManager' qualified with
marker annotations [], which does not exist.
and if i extend IprojectServiceTest with extend TapestryTestCase then the
exception is
FAILED CONFIGURATION: @BeforeClass beforeTest
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Contribution
wp.services.AppModule.contributeComponentRequestHandler(OrderedConfiguration)
(at AppModule.java:108) is for service 'ComponentRequestHandler', which
does not exist.
I just need to get the clientSession to get my event from a server call.
Thanks in advance,
Re: Testing Tapestry
Well I might have misunderstood the user guide here but the following is
true by checking the code:
1. The first (!) encountered constructor with a given annotation is choosen.
Since the JVM makes no statement about the ordering of methods (and
constructors) in the class definition after the compile process,
we have to rephrase the userguide statements to: A random method /
constructor being annotated with @Inject is choosen.
private static T extends Annotation Constructor
findConstructorByAnnotation(Constructor[] constructors,
ClassT annotationClass)
{
for (Constructor c : constructors)
{
if (c.getAnnotation(annotationClass) != null)
return c;
}
return null;
}
2. The method with the most parameters win. There is no distinction between
those parameters that can be injected and those who cant.
So we have to rephrase the inspect parameters and the method with the
most parameters that can (!) be injected by the IOC wins to
simply the constructor with the most parameters win regardless the
injectability. I dreamed about having more then one constructor
and just configure different services applying to different scenarios
(like using a certain library instead of providing a abstraction on top),
but nope I have to deal with it myself.
Here is the code part of selecting note the pragmatism by using sort
instead of a iterator with compare. I like it (really, straight forward
and fast enough).
// Choose a constructor with the most parameters.
ComparatorConstructor comparator = new ComparatorConstructor() {
public int compare(Constructor o1, Constructor o2) {
return o2.getParameterTypes().length -
o1.getParameterTypes().length;
}
};
Arrays.sort(constructors, comparator);
return constructors[0];
I was looking for a way to ask the registry whether a service object for a
given class exists or can be created (there is no way to
ask if a certain service is already instanciated or at least proxiated). No
way to do that.
3. Annotating a parameter inside a constructor to mark it as Injectable is
not the same as putting a @Inject on top of the
constructor itself. Dont ask... just listen :(.
So here is what I do now, I just iterate over candidate methods and if it
finds more than one candidate it just spills out a certain
exception.
Invoker.on(target).call(methodName).with([informalName], [Type,]
value).annotatedWith(annotations...).invoke();
The with part fills in a parameter if the given type is spotted in the
parameter and the parameter does not have a inject
annotation. The order of with is valued. The informalName is just ignored
it is for documentation only to increase
readability.
I was eager to implement a overwrite where you can specify a certain
service interface being not injected but used
as provided. This way I would be able to pass a certain dependency to the
target but I dont have a concrete use
case so this would be overengineering, so its left out.
So invoker.on(myTask).call(process).with(timeout, 60).with(delay,
15).invoke();
This will make it possible to have a method, without knowing it.
MyTask {
boolean process(@Inject service, int timeout, int delay) {
}
}
I also added Invoker.newInstance(class) which just calls autobuild or
Invoker.getService(class) which asks the registry.
Thats it. Simple straight forward and does the job. And I only use it for
some spare situations where
I have to or just dont know what the given implementation will look like
since I will have processing tasks
that do not use the database at all etc. So I dont care for if(task
instanceof foo) anymore and I have
optional before and after methods.
Invoker.on(myTask).callAnyMethod().annotatedWith(Setup.class).invokeIfExists();
And yes this method calls really any method, not just the first found.
Cheers,
Martin (Kersten)
PS: @Thiago Pesti comes from pest and marks something as being sort of a
distraction or an annoyance.
2013/9/23 Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:07:54 -0300, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah thats what I was thinking about exactly. This way I can get rid of
the pesti constructor injection.
Pesti? What is that? If you were talking Brazilian Portuguese, I'd knew. :D
Does anyone knows if the autobuild / build process fails if a property
annotated @inject could not be injected? Kind of should be but I am quite
not sure... .
Try it and tell us what happened. ;)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 04:13:27 -0300, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Thats it. Simple straight forward and does the job. And I only use it for some spare situations where I have to or just dont know what the given implementation will look like since I will have processing tasks that do not use the database at all etc. So I dont care for if(task instanceof foo) anymore and I have optional before and after methods. Invoker.on(myTask).callAnyMethod().annotatedWith(Setup.class).invokeIfExists(); And yes this method calls really any method, not just the first found. Nice! Any plans of opensourcing it? I'm curious to take a look. PS: @Thiago Pesti comes from pest and marks something as being sort of a distraction or an annoyance. Same as in Brazilian Portuguese (peste). :) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:57:41 -0300, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Also the IOC needs a public constructor for autobuild. Fine I dont have any... . Would have been a bug report. But I wont mind... . That's not a bug, that OOP and Java working as they should. How could any code instantiate a class without a public constructor? That would be a violation of access constraints, and the JVM checks for that. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry
Well its a bug. I dont habe any constructor at all. Calm down and relax. You dont need ans. Just call Class.newInstance and you are fine. That is pro.level OOP. :-) Am 24.09.2013 14:34 schrieb Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:57:41 -0300, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Also the IOC needs a public constructor for autobuild. Fine I dont have any... . Would have been a bug report. But I wont mind... . That's not a bug, that OOP and Java working as they should. How could any code instantiate a class without a public constructor? That would be a violation of access constraints, and the JVM checks for that. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry
Ok I found out what happends. The class is a private static class and so the default constructor is private too. Boomer. You can still pass the class along and issue newInstance on it. What a funny thing. So I just check for it and do the newInstance myself and do field injection myself. If I add a public empty constructor tapestry just does it. But I have the inject field dependencies stuff already done (was a almost no brainer so its ok.). 2013/9/24 Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com Well its a bug. I dont habe any constructor at all. Calm down and relax. You dont need ans. Just call Class.newInstance and you are fine. That is pro.level OOP. :-) Am 24.09.2013 14:34 schrieb Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:57:41 -0300, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Also the IOC needs a public constructor for autobuild. Fine I dont have any... . Would have been a bug report. But I wont mind... . That's not a bug, that OOP and Java working as they should. How could any code instantiate a class without a public constructor? That would be a violation of access constraints, and the JVM checks for that. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:18:25 -0300, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Well its a bug. I dont habe any constructor at all. Calm down and relax. You dont need ans. Just call Class.newInstance and you are fine. That is pro.level OOP. :-) In the next message in this thread you said there was no accessible constructor due to the class being an inner static *private* one. I don't need to chill down (I really don't know why you said that) nor pro-level OOP lessons. By the way, that's called 'reflection'. ;) Actually, I taught OOP at graduate-level courses. ;) Cheers! -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry
Actually, I taught OOP at graduate-level courses. ;) Well I attended those Nothing much to say about. But maybe yours are better than the one I needed to attend. Also newInstance works just fine. Even on private static classes. No access restriction here. Also having no default constructor seams to create a private constructor. Weird but fun. Well if I add a public constructor Tapestry also complains about the class being not public. Thanks. Redone it myself and it works. No access restriction nothing. Even when doing it outside of the package. You wanna know why this works? Think about serialization etc. Wont work without being that lax about access restrictions I think. And if you wonder, Its just JDK 7 nothing special. Maybe it blows with sun but i dont think so. Lets wait and see. And thats the way it always worked as long as I can remember. Cheers, Martin Kersten, Germany PS: The OOP pro level stuff was just added with a smiely. It wasnt there to get you on the chair. 2013/9/24 Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:18:25 -0300, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Well its a bug. I dont habe any constructor at all. Calm down and relax. You dont need ans. Just call Class.newInstance and you are fine. That is pro.level OOP. :-) In the next message in this thread you said there was no accessible constructor due to the class being an inner static *private* one. I don't need to chill down (I really don't know why you said that) nor pro-level OOP lessons. By the way, that's called 'reflection'. ;) Actually, I taught OOP at graduate-level courses. ;) Cheers! -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Testing Tapestry
I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any please provide. I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven stuff is to slow for my program test cycle. Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need to do unit testing in java since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test may be done in groovy but I am in doupt this would be such a gain. Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using only a fraction of the services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be fairly fast so it is ok (Hibernate takes way longer) I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a presetup in memory database (h2). I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the dependency setup and stuff. So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what speed means and if you use IOC, jetty or something else. And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal experiences with the background of embedding either a web application server or an IOC. Cheers, Martin (Kersten)
Re: Testing Tapestry
I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for (smoke) integration testing my apps with URLs. All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest ( https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859), all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase with with this patch applied: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107 Which is something you may already read while browsing the web. Do you have any problems with this? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any please provide. I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven stuff is to slow for my program test cycle. Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need to do unit testing in java since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test may be done in groovy but I am in doupt this would be such a gain. Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using only a fraction of the services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be fairly fast so it is ok (Hibernate takes way longer) I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a presetup in memory database (h2). I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the dependency setup and stuff. So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what speed means and if you use IOC, jetty or something else. And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal experiences with the background of embedding either a web application server or an IOC. Cheers, Martin (Kersten) -- Dmitry Gusev AnjLab Team http://anjlab.com
Re: Testing Tapestry
Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder what people nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing. Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com: I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for (smoke) integration testing my apps with URLs. All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest ( https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859), all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase with with this patch applied: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107 Which is something you may already read while browsing the web. Do you have any problems with this? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any please provide. I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven stuff is to slow for my program test cycle. Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need to do unit testing in java since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test may be done in groovy but I am in doupt this would be such a gain. Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using only a fraction of the services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be fairly fast so it is ok (Hibernate takes way longer) I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a presetup in memory database (h2). I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the dependency setup and stuff. So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what speed means and if you use IOC, jetty or something else. And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal experiences with the background of embedding either a web application server or an IOC. Cheers, Martin (Kersten) -- Dmitry Gusev AnjLab Team http://anjlab.com
Re: Testing Tapestry
Is there anything to aid me with the usual service test. Currently I use constructors to ease setup of the services. I will try out providing a test module setting up the services and use tapestry IOC to create those. Should have done so more early on, but wanted it simple first. But now when I have three or four services to setup it becomes cumbersome. 2013/9/23 Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com Thanks daniel. I will check the testify stuff in a real example. 2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop these links for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already). Hope it helps. http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/ and then this one http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/ Dan On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder what people nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing. Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com: I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for (smoke) integration testing my apps with URLs. All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest ( https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859), all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase with with this patch applied: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107 Which is something you may already read while browsing the web. Do you have any problems with this? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any please provide. I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven stuff is to slow for my program test cycle. Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need to do unit testing in java since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test may be done in groovy but I am in doupt this would be such a gain. Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using only a fraction of the services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be fairly fast so it is ok (Hibernate takes way longer) I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a presetup in memory database (h2). I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the dependency setup and stuff. So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what speed means and if you use IOC, jetty or something else. And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal experiences with the background of embedding either a web application server or an IOC. Cheers, Martin (Kersten) -- Dmitry Gusev AnjLab Team http://anjlab.com
Re: Testing Tapestry
http://tapestryxpath.sourceforge.net/ implements XPath over Tapestry Element objects. On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:34:34 -0300, Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com wrote: I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop these links for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already). Hope it helps. http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/ and then this one http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/ Dan On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder what people nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing. Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com: I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for (smoke) integration testing my apps with URLs. All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest ( https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859), all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase with with this patch applied: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107 Which is something you may already read while browsing the web. Do you have any problems with this? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any please provide. I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven stuff is to slow for my program test cycle. Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need to do unit testing in java since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test may be done in groovy but I am in doupt this would be such a gain. Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using only a fraction of the services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be fairly fast so it is ok (Hibernate takes way longer) I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a presetup in memory database (h2). I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the dependency setup and stuff. So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what speed means and if you use IOC, jetty or something else. And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal experiences with the background of embedding either a web application server or an IOC. Cheers, Martin (Kersten) -- Dmitry Gusev AnjLab Team http://anjlab.com -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry
You'll probably find better examples online, but in my Test classes I
usually have a method like this:
private MyDAOMyPojo,MyQueryObject dao;
@BeforeClass
public void beforeClass() {
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
System.out.println(MyDAOTest);
Registry registry;
RegistryBuilder builder = new RegistryBuilder();
builder.add(MyDAOModule.class);
registry = builder.build();
registry.performRegistryStartup();
dao = registry.getService(MyDAO.class);
}
@Test
public void f() {
MyQueryObject q = new MyQueryObject();
q.setAttribute(Martin);
ListMyPojo = dao.findByQuery(q);
//assert something here
}
In MyDAOModule.class, you can set up your services to build via
auto-binding, interface binding, or using a build method (public static
MyDAO buildMyDAO() { ... } )
depending on your needs.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there anything to aid me with the usual service test. Currently I use
constructors to ease setup of the services. I will try out providing a test
module setting up the services and use tapestry IOC to create those. Should
have done so more early on, but wanted it simple first. But now when I have
three or four services to setup it becomes cumbersome.
2013/9/23 Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com
Thanks daniel. I will check the testify stuff in a real example.
2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com
I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop these
links
for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already). Hope it helps.
http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/
and then this one
http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/
Dan
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote:
Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder what
people
nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing.
Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com:
I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for
(smoke)
integration testing my apps with URLs.
All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest (
https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859),
all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase with
with
this
patch applied:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107
Which is something you may already read while browsing the web.
Do you have any problems with this?
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any
please
provide.
I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven stuff
is to
slow for my program test cycle.
Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need
to
do
unit
testing in java
since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test may
be
done
in groovy
but I am in doupt this would be such a gain.
Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using
only a
fraction of the
services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be
fairly
fast
so
it is ok
(Hibernate takes way longer)
I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a presetup
in
memory database (h2).
I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the
dependency
setup and stuff.
So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what speed
means
and
if you
use IOC, jetty or something else.
And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal
experiences
with
the background of embedding either a web application server or an
IOC.
Cheers,
Martin (Kersten)
--
Dmitry Gusev
AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com
Re: Testing Tapestry
Yeah thats what I was thinking about exactly. This way I can get rid of the
pesti constructor injection.
Does anyone knows if the autobuild / build process fails if a property
annotated @inject could not be injected? Kind of should be but I am quite
not sure... .
2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com
You'll probably find better examples online, but in my Test classes I
usually have a method like this:
private MyDAOMyPojo,MyQueryObject dao;
@BeforeClass
public void beforeClass() {
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
System.out.println(MyDAOTest);
Registry registry;
RegistryBuilder builder = new RegistryBuilder();
builder.add(MyDAOModule.class);
registry = builder.build();
registry.performRegistryStartup();
dao = registry.getService(MyDAO.class);
}
@Test
public void f() {
MyQueryObject q = new MyQueryObject();
q.setAttribute(Martin);
ListMyPojo = dao.findByQuery(q);
//assert something here
}
In MyDAOModule.class, you can set up your services to build via
auto-binding, interface binding, or using a build method (public static
MyDAO buildMyDAO() { ... } )
depending on your needs.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there anything to aid me with the usual service test. Currently I use
constructors to ease setup of the services. I will try out providing a
test
module setting up the services and use tapestry IOC to create those.
Should
have done so more early on, but wanted it simple first. But now when I
have
three or four services to setup it becomes cumbersome.
2013/9/23 Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com
Thanks daniel. I will check the testify stuff in a real example.
2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com
I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop these
links
for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already). Hope it helps.
http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/
and then this one
http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/
Dan
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote:
Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder what
people
nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing.
Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
:
I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for
(smoke)
integration testing my apps with URLs.
All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest (
https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859),
all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase with
with
this
patch applied:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107
Which is something you may already read while browsing the web.
Do you have any problems with this?
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any
please
provide.
I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven
stuff
is to
slow for my program test cycle.
Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need
to
do
unit
testing in java
since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test
may
be
done
in groovy
but I am in doupt this would be such a gain.
Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using
only a
fraction of the
services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be
fairly
fast
so
it is ok
(Hibernate takes way longer)
I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a
presetup
in
memory database (h2).
I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the
dependency
setup and stuff.
So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what
speed
means
and
if you
use IOC, jetty or something else.
And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal
experiences
with
the background of embedding either a web application server or
an
IOC.
Cheers,
Martin (Kersten)
--
Dmitry Gusev
AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com
Re: Testing Tapestry
I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop these links for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already). Hope it helps. http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/ and then this one http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/ Dan On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder what people nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing. Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com: I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for (smoke) integration testing my apps with URLs. All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest ( https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859), all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase with with this patch applied: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107 Which is something you may already read while browsing the web. Do you have any problems with this? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any please provide. I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven stuff is to slow for my program test cycle. Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need to do unit testing in java since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test may be done in groovy but I am in doupt this would be such a gain. Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using only a fraction of the services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be fairly fast so it is ok (Hibernate takes way longer) I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a presetup in memory database (h2). I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the dependency setup and stuff. So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what speed means and if you use IOC, jetty or something else. And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal experiences with the background of embedding either a web application server or an IOC. Cheers, Martin (Kersten) -- Dmitry Gusev AnjLab Team http://anjlab.com
Re: Testing Tapestry
Thanks daniel. I will check the testify stuff in a real example. 2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop these links for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already). Hope it helps. http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/ and then this one http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/ Dan On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder what people nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing. Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com: I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for (smoke) integration testing my apps with URLs. All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest ( https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859), all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase with with this patch applied: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107 Which is something you may already read while browsing the web. Do you have any problems with this? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have any please provide. I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven stuff is to slow for my program test cycle. Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I need to do unit testing in java since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test may be done in groovy but I am in doupt this would be such a gain. Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly using only a fraction of the services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be fairly fast so it is ok (Hibernate takes way longer) I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a presetup in memory database (h2). I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the dependency setup and stuff. So in the end I want to hear what you use for testing, what speed means and if you use IOC, jetty or something else. And yes I searched the web high and low, I want just personal experiences with the background of embedding either a web application server or an IOC. Cheers, Martin (Kersten) -- Dmitry Gusev AnjLab Team http://anjlab.com
Re: Testing Tapestry
You can still use a constructor/constructor injection when registering your
service in your module, if you want. (In fact the auto binding looks for
the constructor with the most parameters, if none are marked with @Inject.)
Or, you can use Field Injection. Not sure if you can use both, probably
not.
If you have @Inject in your class X, and then register the class X in your
module, Tapestry should throw an error if it can't find the class Y to
inject into X.
HOWEVER, if you are instantiating the class outside of the registry, the
@Inject annotations are ignored. I know this because I have an old-school
coworker who does not believe in Injection, and I have to make some
services construct-able by him.. *le sigh*
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yeah thats what I was thinking about exactly. This way I can get rid of the
pesti constructor injection.
Does anyone knows if the autobuild / build process fails if a property
annotated @inject could not be injected? Kind of should be but I am quite
not sure... .
2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com
You'll probably find better examples online, but in my Test classes I
usually have a method like this:
private MyDAOMyPojo,MyQueryObject dao;
@BeforeClass
public void beforeClass() {
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
System.out.println(MyDAOTest);
Registry registry;
RegistryBuilder builder = new RegistryBuilder();
builder.add(MyDAOModule.class);
registry = builder.build();
registry.performRegistryStartup();
dao = registry.getService(MyDAO.class);
}
@Test
public void f() {
MyQueryObject q = new MyQueryObject();
q.setAttribute(Martin);
ListMyPojo = dao.findByQuery(q);
//assert something here
}
In MyDAOModule.class, you can set up your services to build via
auto-binding, interface binding, or using a build method (public static
MyDAO buildMyDAO() { ... } )
depending on your needs.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there anything to aid me with the usual service test. Currently I
use
constructors to ease setup of the services. I will try out providing a
test
module setting up the services and use tapestry IOC to create those.
Should
have done so more early on, but wanted it simple first. But now when I
have
three or four services to setup it becomes cumbersome.
2013/9/23 Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com
Thanks daniel. I will check the testify stuff in a real example.
2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com
I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop these
links
for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already). Hope it
helps.
http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/
and then this one
http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/
Dan
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote:
Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder what
people
nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing.
Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb Dmitry Gusev
dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
:
I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for
(smoke)
integration testing my apps with URLs.
All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest (
https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859),
all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase
with
with
this
patch applied:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107
Which is something you may already read while browsing the web.
Do you have any problems with this?
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have
any
please
provide.
I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven
stuff
is to
slow for my program test cycle.
Since I wont use testng I need to rewrite some test code. I
need
to
do
unit
testing in java
since I program in java. Integration test and Acceptance test
may
be
done
in groovy
but I am in doupt this would be such a gain.
Well the unit testing I want to elaborate the IOC directly
using
only a
fraction of the
services the application is about. The IOC setup seams to be
fairly
fast
so
it is ok
(Hibernate takes way longer)
I use a embedded jetty for the integration testing with a
presetup
in
memory database (h2).
I dont use mvn jetty:run since it is dead slow with all the
Re: Testing Tapestry
Well I knew that with the constructor it is exactly what the internal
method createMethodInvocationPlan is doing. The sad thing is I have to
recreate it since its internal.
This ignore Inject works for me since I use autobild method of the regitry.
PS: Everyone is aware of the @Autobuild method? You can create a property
or parameter, annotate with it and Tapestry builds it on the fly using
autobuild.
Just like:
Constructor(@Autobuild ArrayList list1, @Autobuild ArrayList list2) {
assert list1 != list2;
}
Cheers,
Martin (Kersten)
2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com
You can still use a constructor/constructor injection when registering your
service in your module, if you want. (In fact the auto binding looks for
the constructor with the most parameters, if none are marked with @Inject.)
Or, you can use Field Injection. Not sure if you can use both, probably
not.
If you have @Inject in your class X, and then register the class X in your
module, Tapestry should throw an error if it can't find the class Y to
inject into X.
HOWEVER, if you are instantiating the class outside of the registry, the
@Inject annotations are ignored. I know this because I have an old-school
coworker who does not believe in Injection, and I have to make some
services construct-able by him.. *le sigh*
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yeah thats what I was thinking about exactly. This way I can get rid of
the
pesti constructor injection.
Does anyone knows if the autobuild / build process fails if a property
annotated @inject could not be injected? Kind of should be but I am quite
not sure... .
2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com
You'll probably find better examples online, but in my Test classes I
usually have a method like this:
private MyDAOMyPojo,MyQueryObject dao;
@BeforeClass
public void beforeClass() {
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
System.out.println(MyDAOTest);
Registry registry;
RegistryBuilder builder = new RegistryBuilder();
builder.add(MyDAOModule.class);
registry = builder.build();
registry.performRegistryStartup();
dao = registry.getService(MyDAO.class);
}
@Test
public void f() {
MyQueryObject q = new MyQueryObject();
q.setAttribute(Martin);
ListMyPojo = dao.findByQuery(q);
//assert something here
}
In MyDAOModule.class, you can set up your services to build via
auto-binding, interface binding, or using a build method (public static
MyDAO buildMyDAO() { ... } )
depending on your needs.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there anything to aid me with the usual service test. Currently I
use
constructors to ease setup of the services. I will try out providing
a
test
module setting up the services and use tapestry IOC to create those.
Should
have done so more early on, but wanted it simple first. But now when
I
have
three or four services to setup it becomes cumbersome.
2013/9/23 Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com
Thanks daniel. I will check the testify stuff in a real example.
2013/9/23 Daniel Jue teamp...@gmail.com
I don't have spare minutes at the moment, I just want to drop
these
links
for you to look at (if you haven't seen them already). Hope it
helps.
http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/16/improved-testing-facilities/
and then this one
http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/11/18/find-your-elements/
Dan
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote:
Problems nope. I just habe to overhowle the system and wonder
what
people
nicht use. I will check your base clase out. Thanks for sharing.
Am 23.09.2013 18:12 schrieb Dmitry Gusev
dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
:
I use JUnit for unit testing with T5 services, and TestNG for
(smoke)
integration testing my apps with URLs.
All my JUnit test classes inherited from BaseIntegrationTest (
https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859),
all TestNG classes inherited from a copy of SeleniumTestCase
with
with
this
patch applied:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2107
Which is something you may already read while browsing the
web.
Do you have any problems with this?
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Martin Kersten
martin.kersten...@gmail.com
wrote:
I want some real hands on experiences. So please if you have
any
please
provide.
I am currently reworking the testing settup since the maven
stuff
is to
slow for my program test cycle.
Re: Testing Tapestry
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:07:54 -0300, Martin Kersten martin.kersten...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah thats what I was thinking about exactly. This way I can get rid of the pesti constructor injection. Pesti? What is that? If you were talking Brazilian Portuguese, I'd knew. :D Does anyone knows if the autobuild / build process fails if a property annotated @inject could not be injected? Kind of should be but I am quite not sure... . Try it and tell us what happened. ;) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Testing Tapestry without Seleinum
So I have a fairly complicated page that has a slider that filters by a date range. It gets all entries whose copyright dates fall in between the min and max years. I've tried like mad to figure out how to get the slider to activate properly with Selenium and everything that was suggested online ended up hanging Selenium and didn't work. I then started looking to test this functionality outside of Selenium, but since the parameters that I am dealing with are marked @Property (copyrightMax, copyrightMin), my test class doesn't have any way to set these two values - which would allow me to circumvent using Selenium to set them via the slider). Has anyone out there tried testing a page outside of Selenium? If so, how did you set something that is marked @Property? Thanks! Melanie -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Testing-Tapestry-without-Seleinum-tp5717383.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry without Seleinum
Replace @Property with getter/setter for the property? -- Chris On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:09 PM, mbrooks mela...@ifactory.com wrote: So I have a fairly complicated page that has a slider that filters by a date range. It gets all entries whose copyright dates fall in between the min and max years. I've tried like mad to figure out how to get the slider to activate properly with Selenium and everything that was suggested online ended up hanging Selenium and didn't work. I then started looking to test this functionality outside of Selenium, but since the parameters that I am dealing with are marked @Property (copyrightMax, copyrightMin), my test class doesn't have any way to set these two values - which would allow me to circumvent using Selenium to set them via the slider). Has anyone out there tried testing a page outside of Selenium? If so, how did you set something that is marked @Property? Thanks! Melanie -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Testing-Tapestry-without-Seleinum-tp5717383.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry without Seleinum
Right. Except that Selenium keeps freezing whenever I try to get it to move a slider. It works great for all the other components and I don't have time to keep trying to drive a square peg into a round hole. Just because something is supposed to work doesn't mean it always will. I'd rather just try to test this outside of Selenium. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Testing-Tapestry-without-Seleinum-tp5717383p5717387.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry without Seleinum
Oh man, I wish I was using jQuery. It's a component that lives in ProtoType. Might be why Selenium is choking on it . Though, that's a good idea to see if I can't just set those values and still use Selenium. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Testing-Tapestry-without-Seleinum-tp5717383p5717390.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
RE: testing Tapestry applications (in general) [I]
Classification: For internal use only You may also find Tapestry Testify useful (http://tapestry.formos.com/nightly/tapestry-testify/) - it's designed for the class of tests where you want to test the web aspects of your application (particularly in a unit-test style) but aren't concerned with browser functionality (e.g. Javascript). On my projects, we used Selenium to drive tests of browser behaviour (Javascript etc) and to drive smoke tests of a complete running system. We used Testify to do unit testing of pages/components and (integrated with Fitnesse) to do acceptance tests where the web was involved (e.g. when the user does A,B,C then the page shows a table like this: . ). And then JUnit etc... to do the non-web unit testing. Best wishes, Paul -Original Message- From: Christian Köberl [mailto:tapestry.christian.koeb...@gmail.com] Sent: 04 November 2011 18:55 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: testing Tapestry applications (in general) 2011/11/04 15:01, Markus Johnston: We very much would like to start writing view and controller tests. I was wondering what other Tapestry users are doing, as far as testing is concerned. What problems have you run into? What tools or approaches have you found that work especially well? We have a quite big application (200k lines) and needed some integration/acceptance end-to-end tests (as an addition to our unit tests). Our first approach were TestNG tests based on Selenium 1.x and backend calls in the same VM as the application itself. The pros are that you can use the backend directly but you cannot test the app in the target environment. Another problem is that the QA and our customer cannot understand the TestNG specs. We also had big compatibility problems with Selenium and browsers. Our current tests are built on BDD with cuke4duke with Selenium 2.x web driver. The tests run standalone and can be run against our QA or other environments. We are porting our old tests when we're changing/refactoring stuff. Our experience with this stack: cuke4duke is a Ruby port and not a 1st class JVM citizen, so you get some problems. That's why we think about migrating to JBehave - but that's no big deal because it works exactly the same. Selenium web driver is very good and also works perfectly with IE and different versions of Firefox. For acceptance tests and especially for UI tests consider to organize your tests in layers (see http://cuke4ninja.com/chp_three_layers.html). We have a testhelper for making direct backend calls through Spring remoting - but just for things you cannot do via UI. A really good book about organizing your builds and tests (and especially about automated testing) is Continuous Delivery from Jez Humble and David Farley: http://amzn.to/qy2rc5 After all tries (and some failures) I'd advise this: * Use BDD if you need to communicate tests in any way, use JUnit/TestNG otherwise * Layer your tests in workflows and technical stuff * Use Selenium 2.x web driver for UI tests * Write tests that run against any environment (your local started IDE instance, your QA server - even your prod environment) Hope this helps ... -- Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org --- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
testing Tapestry applications (in general)
We have been struggling (in my opinion) with a strategy to properly and completely test our web application (developed using Tapestry). We have some unit tests, but they are all centered on the code closer to the model. We have very few, if any, view and controller tests. We made some attempts in the past to write selenium tests, but for whatever reason, that did not catch on. We have also attempted to use WebDriver along with Geb, but continued to run into reliability issues with WebDriver and were frustrated with the inability of the WebDriver developers to settle on an API. Geb has some nice features to it, though. We very much would like to start writing view and controller tests. I was wondering what other Tapestry users are doing, as far as testing is concerned. What problems have you run into? What tools or approaches have you found that work especially well?
Re: testing Tapestry applications (in general)
Your mileage may vary but for my perspective, see http://docs.codehaus.org/display/TYNAMO/2010/07/30/Full+web+integration+testing+in+a+single+JVM. For service level tests, I tend to use Mockito a lot. Kalle On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Markus Johnston tapes...@garstasio.com wrote: We have been struggling (in my opinion) with a strategy to properly and completely test our web application (developed using Tapestry). We have some unit tests, but they are all centered on the code closer to the model. We have very few, if any, view and controller tests. We made some attempts in the past to write selenium tests, but for whatever reason, that did not catch on. We have also attempted to use WebDriver along with Geb, but continued to run into reliability issues with WebDriver and were frustrated with the inability of the WebDriver developers to settle on an API. Geb has some nice features to it, though. We very much would like to start writing view and controller tests. I was wondering what other Tapestry users are doing, as far as testing is concerned. What problems have you run into? What tools or approaches have you found that work especially well? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: testing Tapestry applications (in general)
I've found HTMLUnit, in the past to be utterly awful. At least with our web app (lots of ajax) HTMLUnit struggled and I ran into a lot of bugs. On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.comwrote: Your mileage may vary but for my perspective, see http://docs.codehaus.org/display/TYNAMO/2010/07/30/Full+web+integration+testing+in+a+single+JVM . For service level tests, I tend to use Mockito a lot. Kalle On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Markus Johnston tapes...@garstasio.com wrote: We have been struggling (in my opinion) with a strategy to properly and completely test our web application (developed using Tapestry). We have some unit tests, but they are all centered on the code closer to the model. We have very few, if any, view and controller tests. We made some attempts in the past to write selenium tests, but for whatever reason, that did not catch on. We have also attempted to use WebDriver along with Geb, but continued to run into reliability issues with WebDriver and were frustrated with the inability of the WebDriver developers to settle on an API. Geb has some nice features to it, though. We very much would like to start writing view and controller tests. I was wondering what other Tapestry users are doing, as far as testing is concerned. What problems have you run into? What tools or approaches have you found that work especially well? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: testing Tapestry applications (in general)
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Markus Johnston tapes...@garstasio.com wrote: I've found HTMLUnit, in the past to be utterly awful. At least with our web app (lots of ajax) HTMLUnit struggled and I ran into a lot of bugs. Yeah, I've heard that a few times and my own experience in the past was also that HTMLUnit couldn't cope with the bigger Javascript stacks, however the newer versions (2.8, 2.9) manage to run current versions of Prototype, jQuery in my apps just fine. Kalle On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.comwrote: Your mileage may vary but for my perspective, see http://docs.codehaus.org/display/TYNAMO/2010/07/30/Full+web+integration+testing+in+a+single+JVM . For service level tests, I tend to use Mockito a lot. Kalle On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Markus Johnston tapes...@garstasio.com wrote: We have been struggling (in my opinion) with a strategy to properly and completely test our web application (developed using Tapestry). We have some unit tests, but they are all centered on the code closer to the model. We have very few, if any, view and controller tests. We made some attempts in the past to write selenium tests, but for whatever reason, that did not catch on. We have also attempted to use WebDriver along with Geb, but continued to run into reliability issues with WebDriver and were frustrated with the inability of the WebDriver developers to settle on an API. Geb has some nice features to it, though. We very much would like to start writing view and controller tests. I was wondering what other Tapestry users are doing, as far as testing is concerned. What problems have you run into? What tools or approaches have you found that work especially well? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: testing Tapestry applications (in general)
Thanks for the info. I'll probably check out newer versions of HTMLUnit then, to see if it is an option for us. On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Markus Johnston tapes...@garstasio.com wrote: I've found HTMLUnit, in the past to be utterly awful. At least with our web app (lots of ajax) HTMLUnit struggled and I ran into a lot of bugs. Yeah, I've heard that a few times and my own experience in the past was also that HTMLUnit couldn't cope with the bigger Javascript stacks, however the newer versions (2.8, 2.9) manage to run current versions of Prototype, jQuery in my apps just fine. Kalle On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.comwrote: Your mileage may vary but for my perspective, see http://docs.codehaus.org/display/TYNAMO/2010/07/30/Full+web+integration+testing+in+a+single+JVM . For service level tests, I tend to use Mockito a lot. Kalle On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Markus Johnston tapes...@garstasio.com wrote: We have been struggling (in my opinion) with a strategy to properly and completely test our web application (developed using Tapestry). We have some unit tests, but they are all centered on the code closer to the model. We have very few, if any, view and controller tests. We made some attempts in the past to write selenium tests, but for whatever reason, that did not catch on. We have also attempted to use WebDriver along with Geb, but continued to run into reliability issues with WebDriver and were frustrated with the inability of the WebDriver developers to settle on an API. Geb has some nice features to it, though. We very much would like to start writing view and controller tests. I was wondering what other Tapestry users are doing, as far as testing is concerned. What problems have you run into? What tools or approaches have you found that work especially well? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: testing Tapestry applications (in general)
2011/11/04 15:01, Markus Johnston: We very much would like to start writing view and controller tests. I was wondering what other Tapestry users are doing, as far as testing is concerned. What problems have you run into? What tools or approaches have you found that work especially well? We have a quite big application (200k lines) and needed some integration/acceptance end-to-end tests (as an addition to our unit tests). Our first approach were TestNG tests based on Selenium 1.x and backend calls in the same VM as the application itself. The pros are that you can use the backend directly but you cannot test the app in the target environment. Another problem is that the QA and our customer cannot understand the TestNG specs. We also had big compatibility problems with Selenium and browsers. Our current tests are built on BDD with cuke4duke with Selenium 2.x web driver. The tests run standalone and can be run against our QA or other environments. We are porting our old tests when we're changing/refactoring stuff. Our experience with this stack: cuke4duke is a Ruby port and not a 1st class JVM citizen, so you get some problems. That's why we think about migrating to JBehave - but that's no big deal because it works exactly the same. Selenium web driver is very good and also works perfectly with IE and different versions of Firefox. For acceptance tests and especially for UI tests consider to organize your tests in layers (see http://cuke4ninja.com/chp_three_layers.html). We have a testhelper for making direct backend calls through Spring remoting - but just for things you cannot do via UI. A really good book about organizing your builds and tests (and especially about automated testing) is Continuous Delivery from Jez Humble and David Farley: http://amzn.to/qy2rc5 After all tries (and some failures) I'd advise this: * Use BDD if you need to communicate tests in any way, use JUnit/TestNG otherwise * Layer your tests in workflows and technical stuff * Use Selenium 2.x web driver for UI tests * Write tests that run against any environment (your local started IDE instance, your QA server - even your prod environment) Hope this helps ... -- Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Unit testing Tapestry within intellij?
yes. I actually sorted the problem. I had forgotten to include servet api as
a provided dependency in my pom.xml.
Thanks Mark.
Julien.
2011/7/14 Mark mark-li...@xeric.net
Do you actually have a page in com.cheetah.web.pages that is called
CreateJobPosting that you can view in a web browser when the app is
running?
Mark
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Julien Martin bal...@gmail.com wrote:
*public class CreateJobPosting{
@Test
public void test1() {
String appPackage = com.cheetah.web;
String appName = app;
PageTester tester = new PageTester(appPackage, appName,
src/main/webapp);
Document doc = tester.renderPage(CreateJobPosting);
}
}
*
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Unit testing Tapestry within intellij?
Do you actually have a page in com.cheetah.web.pages that is called
CreateJobPosting that you can view in a web browser when the app is
running?
Mark
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Julien Martin bal...@gmail.com wrote:
*public class CreateJobPosting{
@Test
public void test1() {
String appPackage = com.cheetah.web;
String appName = app;
PageTester tester = new PageTester(appPackage, appName,
src/main/webapp);
Document doc = tester.renderPage(CreateJobPosting);
}
}
*
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Unit testing Tapestry within intellij?
Hello,
I am trying to follow the unit testing tutorial provided here:
http://tapestry.apache.org/unit-testing-pages-or-components.html and I am
not able to run the tests from Intellij. Here is what I get:
*com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter -ideVersion5 -junit4
tests.CreateJobPosting
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
(org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.RegistryBuilder).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest
at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2444)
at java.lang.Class.privateGetPublicMethods(Class.java:2564)
at java.lang.Class.getMethods(Class.java:1427)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.DefaultModuleDefImpl.init(DefaultModuleDefImpl.java:148)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.RegistryBuilder.add(RegistryBuilder.java:124)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.TapestryAppInitializer.addModules(TapestryAppInitializer.java:186)
at
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.TapestryAppInitializer.init(TapestryAppInitializer.java:136)
at org.apache.tapestry5.test.PageTester.init(PageTester.java:106)
at tests.CreateJobPosting.test1(CreateJobPosting.java:21)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157)
at
com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:71)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:199)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:62)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:120)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266)
... 36 more
Process finished with exit code 255
*
Can anyone please help me: I am new to Tapestry and Intellij...
Thanks in advance,
Julien.
PS. Here is the content of my java class:
*public class CreateJobPosting{
@Test
public void test1() {
String appPackage = com.cheetah.web;
String appName = app;
PageTester tester = new PageTester(appPackage, appName,
src/main/webapp);
Document doc = tester.renderPage(CreateJobPosting);
}
}
*
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote: Since these are edit or delete links this would be ambigous. I guess there will be dozens of links called edit on that page. Hm. So do you know anything about the item you are trying to delete or edit? If you know the id, you can work that into the id tag and select on that. If you know the position, you can select based on the position. There might be a way to use Xpath to basically say: select the edit link after the words 'blue widget' but I'm not sure exactly how you would do that. If you don't know any of these things about what you are trying to click, I'm not sure you can run selenium in any type of deterministic manner because your selection must be based on something outside the system. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Hi!
It's probably better to use an approach like Mark's suggestion in my case,
given that I have no idea the IDs of the elements, because these depend on the
database.
But, the problem here is that I don't know the position in the Grid of the
elements. So, is there a way to iterate the rows of a Grid, looking for a
particular element?
Thanks for the responses! Cheers!
Matias.
--- El mar 25-ene-11, Mark mark-li...@xeric.net escribió:
De: Mark mark-li...@xeric.net
Asunto: Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Para: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Fecha: martes, 25 de enero de 2011, 20:36
Using the userId as shown above is
probably your best bet. However, if
you don't have a userId an you are getting ids like:
modifyUserLink_f8ab4c23
You might try something like this:
click(xpath=(//a[starts-with(@id,'modifyUserLink')])[3]);
That would click on the third item that is found with an id
starting
with modifyUserLink.
Mark
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Igor Drobiazko
igor.drobia...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you don't like to provide client-ids besides t:id,
you might create a
mixin which will force t:id to be id as well.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Matias Moran
matiasmo...@yahoo.com.arwrote:
Thanks a lot Thiago!
I will try something like this, I was hoping I
didn't need to use IDs, but
if there is no other solution, it is better than
nothing.
Thanks again! Greetings!
Matias.
--- El mar 25-ene-11, Thiago H. de Paula
Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
escribió:
De: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
Asunto: Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with
Selenium
Para: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Fecha: martes, 25 de enero de 2011, 17:57
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:51:53 -0200,
Matias Moran matiasmo...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
The code generated by Selenium is
something like
this:
selenium.click(//a[@id='modifyUserLink']/div);selenium.waitForPageToLoad(3);
When inside a loop, if you don't provide the
id for your
ActionLinks, they'll generate different ids
for them.
Try something like this:
t:actionLink t:id=modifyUserLink
context=user.id
id=actionLink-${user.id}/
selenium.click(actionLink-1); // or some
valid user id
instead of 1
--Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and
Hibernate
consultant, developer, and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação
Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Best regards,
Igor Drobiazko
http://tapestry5.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Matias Moran matiasmo...@yahoo.com.ar wrote: But, the problem here is that I don't know the position in the Grid of the elements. So, is there a way to iterate the rows of a Grid, looking for a particular element? Do you know the name of the link? Can you use something like: click(“link=Text Of Link”); Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Since these are edit or delete links this would be ambigous. I guess there will be dozens of links called edit on that page. On 26.01.2011 15:49, Mark wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Matias Moranmatiasmo...@yahoo.com.ar wrote: But, the problem here is that I don't know the position in the Grid of the elements. So, is there a way to iterate the rows of a Grid, looking for a particular element? Do you know the name of the link? Can you use something like: click(“link=Text Of Link”); Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Dear Tapestry users, how are you? I'm writing because in the last few days we have been implementing integration tests using Selenium, but we have found a few issues that I'm not sure if these are our mistakes, or maybe it is not possible to be tested. One of those issues appear when trying to click on an actionLink inside a Grid component, lets say a link to Delete or Modify one of the rows. The error is always the same: com.thoughtworks.selenium.SeleniumException: ERROR: Element nameOfTheElement not found. We tried different variations of the element name, including using XPath. But none of these worked. The question is: is it possible to test Tapestry actionLinks inside Grids or other components using Selenium generated tests? Thanks in advance! Greetings. Matias. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Yes, it is possible. If you provide your code, probably we'll be able to help you. On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Matias Moran matiasmo...@yahoo.com.arwrote: Dear Tapestry users, how are you? I'm writing because in the last few days we have been implementing integration tests using Selenium, but we have found a few issues that I'm not sure if these are our mistakes, or maybe it is not possible to be tested. One of those issues appear when trying to click on an actionLink inside a Grid component, lets say a link to Delete or Modify one of the rows. The error is always the same: com.thoughtworks.selenium.SeleniumException: ERROR: Element nameOfTheElement not found. We tried different variations of the element name, including using XPath. But none of these worked. The question is: is it possible to test Tapestry actionLinks inside Grids or other components using Selenium generated tests? Thanks in advance! Greetings. Matias. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:20:38 -0200, Matias Moran matiasmo...@yahoo.com.ar wrote: Dear Tapestry users, how are you? Hi! One of those issues appear when trying to click on an actionLink inside a Grid component, lets say a link to Delete or Modify one of the rows. The error is always the same: com.thoughtworks.selenium.SeleniumException: ERROR: Element nameOfTheElement not found. You're probably using an id locator. You can provide your own ids (just add an id attribute to it) or use another locator (XPath or CSS). -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.arsmachina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Thanks for the quick response! Here is a piece of the code I'm trying to test: t:grid t:source=userList row=user add=modify p:modifycell t:actionLink t:id=modifyUserLink context=user.id/ /p:modifycell /t:grid The code generated by Selenium is something like this: selenium.click(//a[@id='modifyUserLink']/div);selenium.waitForPageToLoad(3); But it always fails, giving the error I posted before, that it doesn't find that element. Thanks again! Cheers. Matias. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:51:53 -0200, Matias Moran
matiasmo...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
The code generated by Selenium is something like this:
selenium.click(//a[@id='modifyUserLink']/div);selenium.waitForPageToLoad(3);
When inside a loop, if you don't provide the id for your ActionLinks,
they'll generate different ids for them.
Try something like this:
t:actionLink t:id=modifyUserLink context=user.id
id=actionLink-${user.id}/
selenium.click(actionLink-1); // or some valid user id instead of 1
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Thanks a lot Thiago!
I will try something like this, I was hoping I didn't need to use IDs, but if
there is no other solution, it is better than nothing.
Thanks again! Greetings!
Matias.
--- El mar 25-ene-11, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
escribió:
De: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
Asunto: Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Para: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Fecha: martes, 25 de enero de 2011, 17:57
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:51:53 -0200,
Matias Moran matiasmo...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
The code generated by Selenium is something like
this:
selenium.click(//a[@id='modifyUserLink']/div);selenium.waitForPageToLoad(3);
When inside a loop, if you don't provide the id for your
ActionLinks, they'll generate different ids for them.
Try something like this:
t:actionLink t:id=modifyUserLink context=user.id
id=actionLink-${user.id}/
selenium.click(actionLink-1); // or some valid user id
instead of 1
--Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate
consultant, developer, and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
If you don't like to provide client-ids besides t:id, you might create a
mixin which will force t:id to be id as well.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Matias Moran matiasmo...@yahoo.com.arwrote:
Thanks a lot Thiago!
I will try something like this, I was hoping I didn't need to use IDs, but
if there is no other solution, it is better than nothing.
Thanks again! Greetings!
Matias.
--- El mar 25-ene-11, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
escribió:
De: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
Asunto: Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Para: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Fecha: martes, 25 de enero de 2011, 17:57
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:51:53 -0200,
Matias Moran matiasmo...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
The code generated by Selenium is something like
this:
selenium.click(//a[@id='modifyUserLink']/div);selenium.waitForPageToLoad(3);
When inside a loop, if you don't provide the id for your
ActionLinks, they'll generate different ids for them.
Try something like this:
t:actionLink t:id=modifyUserLink context=user.id
id=actionLink-${user.id}/
selenium.click(actionLink-1); // or some valid user id
instead of 1
--Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate
consultant, developer, and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Best regards,
Igor Drobiazko
http://tapestry5.de
Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Using the userId as shown above is probably your best bet. However, if
you don't have a userId an you are getting ids like:
modifyUserLink_f8ab4c23
You might try something like this:
click(xpath=(//a[starts-with(@id,'modifyUserLink')])[3]);
That would click on the third item that is found with an id starting
with modifyUserLink.
Mark
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Igor Drobiazko
igor.drobia...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't like to provide client-ids besides t:id, you might create a
mixin which will force t:id to be id as well.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Matias Moran matiasmo...@yahoo.com.arwrote:
Thanks a lot Thiago!
I will try something like this, I was hoping I didn't need to use IDs, but
if there is no other solution, it is better than nothing.
Thanks again! Greetings!
Matias.
--- El mar 25-ene-11, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
escribió:
De: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
Asunto: Re: Testing Tapestry webapps with Selenium
Para: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Fecha: martes, 25 de enero de 2011, 17:57
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:51:53 -0200,
Matias Moran matiasmo...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
The code generated by Selenium is something like
this:
selenium.click(//a[@id='modifyUserLink']/div);selenium.waitForPageToLoad(3);
When inside a loop, if you don't provide the id for your
ActionLinks, they'll generate different ids for them.
Try something like this:
t:actionLink t:id=modifyUserLink context=user.id
id=actionLink-${user.id}/
selenium.click(actionLink-1); // or some valid user id
instead of 1
--Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate
consultant, developer, and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Best regards,
Igor Drobiazko
http://tapestry5.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Integration testing Tapestry 4 applications
Hugo, Have you run into any snags using this in the past month? Carlos -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Integration-testing-Tapestry-4-applications-tf3927683.html#a12283397 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Integration testing Tapestry 4 applications
Thought i'd share my experience with this. Hope to get some comments with improvement and more ideas. http://blogs.logical-software.com/roller/logicalme/entry/1 Cheers, Hugo
Re: Integration testing Tapestry 4 applications
Hi Nice approach, however we are using Cruise Control that runs HTTPUnit based tests on the reference environment where latest version of the subsystem was recently reinstalled (also by cruise control, maven and cargo). This has an advantage of the independent database schema (our reference environment is available for the customers). Reference environment has a stable database schema and stable database content. Also our web application uses JNDI to lookup resources which makes jetty configuration a bit more painful. Renat On 15/06/07, Hugo Palma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought i'd share my experience with this. Hope to get some comments with improvement and more ideas. http://blogs.logical-software.com/roller/logicalme/entry/1 Cheers, Hugo -- Best regards, Renat Zubairov - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Integration testing Tapestry 4 applications
Yes, I had the same impression. Also JNDI is not in jetty but in jetty-plus. On 15/06/07, Hugo Palma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regarding the JNDI lookup, i actually don't know if it's even possible like this, because the tapestry-test library still uses Jetty 5. Even if it did use Jetty, i don't think the tapestry-test API allows you to add resources. m...i'll have to dig a little more into that... Renat Zubairov wrote: Hi Nice approach, however we are using Cruise Control that runs HTTPUnit based tests on the reference environment where latest version of the subsystem was recently reinstalled (also by cruise control, maven and cargo). This has an advantage of the independent database schema (our reference environment is available for the customers). Reference environment has a stable database schema and stable database content. Also our web application uses JNDI to lookup resources which makes jetty configuration a bit more painful. Renat On 15/06/07, Hugo Palma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought i'd share my experience with this. Hope to get some comments with improvement and more ideas. http://blogs.logical-software.com/roller/logicalme/entry/1 Cheers, Hugo -- Best regards, Renat Zubairov - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unit testing Tapestry 4.1 components with TestNG and Easymock
Thanks for you advice. I think I'm a bit further forward.
viewProductDetail is actually a Tapestry component and is instantiated
using the com.javaforge.tapestry.testng.TestBase; library.
I have removed the expect call from my testGetSaving method and moved
the replay/verify to my setUp method.
My main problem now relates to the following calls:
webRequest.getSession(true)
viewProductDetail.setRequest(webRequest)
The Mock WebRequest object gets passed ok with the second call, however
the as far as the viewProductDetail object is concerned the Session
doesn't exist and I'm not sure how to get access to it.
Any help will be much appreciated
Ray
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
Hmm .I can't pinpoint the exact problem but if it were up to me I
would
start out by changing things to look more like:
public void setUp() {
...
webRequest = createMock(WebRequest.class);
expect(webRequest.getSession(true)).andReturn(webSession);
...
}
public void testGetSaving(Product product) throws Exception{
viewProductDetail.setProduct(product); // this looks suspicious - if
it's a mock then what you are
// telling easymock is that it should expect someone to call
setProduct(product) when you invoke getSaving() ?
expect(viewProductDetail.getSaving()).andReturn(saving);
replay();
saving = viewProductDetail.getSaving();
verify();
assertEquals(saving, 0.02);
}
On 6/1/07, Ray McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for you quick reply.
Sorry, my fault, I must have deleted these while removing my sysouts for
this post.
I have tried using these but unfortunately receive the same exception. I
have also done several searches on google, which seems to suggest the
exception is caused by the omission of the replay() method. However
their inclusion doesn't seem to change anything.
My updated methods are:
public void setUp() {
...
webRequest = createMock(WebRequest.class);
expect(webRequest.getSession(true)).andReturn(webSession);
replay();
webSession = webRequest.getSession(true);
verify();
...
}
public void testGetSaving(Product product) {
try
{
viewProductDetail.setProduct(product);
expect(viewProductDetail.getSaving()).andReturn(saving);
replay();
saving = viewProductDetail.getSaving();
verify();
assertEquals(saving, 0.02);
}
catch(RuntimeException e){
System.out.println(e.toString());
}
Thanks for any help
Ray
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
You still need to call the replay() / verify() easymock methods, which
can
be examined further here:
http://easymock.org/EasyMock2_2_Documentation.html
I think getSession(boolean) also returns a value - so you'd have to
define
what that return value is with a statement like:
expect(webRequest.getSession(true)).andReturn(session); (or
andReturn(null)
) .
On 6/1/07, Ray McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
We have recently upgrading one of our apps to Tapestry 4.1 and I have
been asked to write some unit tests for the existing components.
I am new to Tapestry, TestNG and Easymock, so please bear with me.
I am trying to get the test to run through an if statement, but I
keep
getting the following runtime exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: missing behavior definition for the
preceeding method call getSession(true)
The class for the component is as follows:
public abstract class ViewProductDetail extends BaseComponent
{
@InjectObject(infrastructure:request)
public abstract WebRequest getRequest();
public abstract void setRequest(WebRequest webRequest);
@InjectState(visit)
public abstract Visit getSession();
public Double getSaving()
{
...
if(getRequest().getSession(false) != null)
{
Visit visit = getSession();
String discountcode = visit.getDiscountCode();
Double saving = new Double(rrp.getValue().doubleValue() -
price.getValue(discountcode).doubleValue());
return saving;
}
else
{
...
}
}
My Test class is as follows:
public class ViewProductDetailTest extends TestBase
{
...
@BeforeClass
public void setUp() {
viewProductDetail = newInstance(ViewProductDetail.class);
webRequest = createMock(WebRequest.class);
webRequest.getSession(true);
viewProductDetail.setRequest(webRequest);
}
@Test (dataProvider = CreateProduct)
public void testGetSaving(Product product) {
try
{
viewProductDetail.setProduct(product);
Double saving = viewProductDetail.getSaving();
assertEquals(saving, 0.02);
}
catch(RuntimeException e){
System.out.println(e.toString());
}
}
I'm not sure to the best way to create a session so that my if
statement
will be true. I'm trying to use webRequest.getSession(true), but it
doesnt seem to work and I don't know if there is a better way or if I
have missed
Re: Unit testing Tapestry 4.1 components with TestNG and Easymock
You still need to call the replay() / verify() easymock methods, which can
be examined further here:
http://easymock.org/EasyMock2_2_Documentation.html
I think getSession(boolean) also returns a value - so you'd have to define
what that return value is with a statement like:
expect(webRequest.getSession(true)).andReturn(session); (or andReturn(null)
) .
On 6/1/07, Ray McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
We have recently upgrading one of our apps to Tapestry 4.1 and I have
been asked to write some unit tests for the existing components.
I am new to Tapestry, TestNG and Easymock, so please bear with me.
I am trying to get the test to run through an if statement, but I keep
getting the following runtime exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: missing behavior definition for the
preceeding method call getSession(true)
The class for the component is as follows:
public abstract class ViewProductDetail extends BaseComponent
{
@InjectObject(infrastructure:request)
public abstract WebRequest getRequest();
public abstract void setRequest(WebRequest webRequest);
@InjectState(visit)
public abstract Visit getSession();
public Double getSaving()
{
...
if(getRequest().getSession(false) != null)
{
Visit visit = getSession();
String discountcode = visit.getDiscountCode();
Double saving = new Double(rrp.getValue().doubleValue() -
price.getValue(discountcode).doubleValue());
return saving;
}
else
{
...
}
}
My Test class is as follows:
public class ViewProductDetailTest extends TestBase
{
...
@BeforeClass
public void setUp() {
viewProductDetail = newInstance(ViewProductDetail.class);
webRequest = createMock(WebRequest.class);
webRequest.getSession(true);
viewProductDetail.setRequest(webRequest);
}
@Test (dataProvider = CreateProduct)
public void testGetSaving(Product product) {
try
{
viewProductDetail.setProduct(product);
Double saving = viewProductDetail.getSaving();
assertEquals(saving, 0.02);
}
catch(RuntimeException e){
System.out.println(e.toString());
}
}
I'm not sure to the best way to create a session so that my if statement
will be true. I'm trying to use webRequest.getSession(true), but it
doesnt seem to work and I don't know if there is a better way or if I
have missed something.
Thanks for any help
Ray
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
Re: Unit testing Tapestry 4.1 components with TestNG and Easymock
Hi,
Thanks for you quick reply.
Sorry, my fault, I must have deleted these while removing my sysouts for
this post.
I have tried using these but unfortunately receive the same exception. I
have also done several searches on google, which seems to suggest the
exception is caused by the omission of the replay() method. However
their inclusion doesn't seem to change anything.
My updated methods are:
public void setUp() {
...
webRequest = createMock(WebRequest.class);
expect(webRequest.getSession(true)).andReturn(webSession);
replay();
webSession = webRequest.getSession(true);
verify();
...
}
public void testGetSaving(Product product) {
try
{
viewProductDetail.setProduct(product);
expect(viewProductDetail.getSaving()).andReturn(saving);
replay();
saving = viewProductDetail.getSaving();
verify();
assertEquals(saving, 0.02);
}
catch(RuntimeException e){
System.out.println(e.toString());
}
Thanks for any help
Ray
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
You still need to call the replay() / verify() easymock methods, which
can
be examined further here:
http://easymock.org/EasyMock2_2_Documentation.html
I think getSession(boolean) also returns a value - so you'd have to
define
what that return value is with a statement like:
expect(webRequest.getSession(true)).andReturn(session); (or
andReturn(null)
) .
On 6/1/07, Ray McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
We have recently upgrading one of our apps to Tapestry 4.1 and I have
been asked to write some unit tests for the existing components.
I am new to Tapestry, TestNG and Easymock, so please bear with me.
I am trying to get the test to run through an if statement, but I keep
getting the following runtime exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: missing behavior definition for the
preceeding method call getSession(true)
The class for the component is as follows:
public abstract class ViewProductDetail extends BaseComponent
{
@InjectObject(infrastructure:request)
public abstract WebRequest getRequest();
public abstract void setRequest(WebRequest webRequest);
@InjectState(visit)
public abstract Visit getSession();
public Double getSaving()
{
...
if(getRequest().getSession(false) != null)
{
Visit visit = getSession();
String discountcode = visit.getDiscountCode();
Double saving = new Double(rrp.getValue().doubleValue() -
price.getValue(discountcode).doubleValue());
return saving;
}
else
{
...
}
}
My Test class is as follows:
public class ViewProductDetailTest extends TestBase
{
...
@BeforeClass
public void setUp() {
viewProductDetail = newInstance(ViewProductDetail.class);
webRequest = createMock(WebRequest.class);
webRequest.getSession(true);
viewProductDetail.setRequest(webRequest);
}
@Test (dataProvider = CreateProduct)
public void testGetSaving(Product product) {
try
{
viewProductDetail.setProduct(product);
Double saving = viewProductDetail.getSaving();
assertEquals(saving, 0.02);
}
catch(RuntimeException e){
System.out.println(e.toString());
}
}
I'm not sure to the best way to create a session so that my if statement
will be true. I'm trying to use webRequest.getSession(true), but it
doesnt seem to work and I don't know if there is a better way or if I
have missed something.
Thanks for any help
Ray
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unit testing Tapestry 4.1 components with TestNG and Easymock
Hmm .I can't pinpoint the exact problem but if it were up to me I would
start out by changing things to look more like:
public void setUp() {
...
webRequest = createMock(WebRequest.class);
expect(webRequest.getSession(true)).andReturn(webSession);
...
}
public void testGetSaving(Product product) throws Exception{
viewProductDetail.setProduct(product); // this looks suspicious - if
it's a mock then what you are
// telling easymock is that it should expect someone to call
setProduct(product) when you invoke getSaving() ?
expect(viewProductDetail.getSaving()).andReturn(saving);
replay();
saving = viewProductDetail.getSaving();
verify();
assertEquals(saving, 0.02);
}
On 6/1/07, Ray McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for you quick reply.
Sorry, my fault, I must have deleted these while removing my sysouts for
this post.
I have tried using these but unfortunately receive the same exception. I
have also done several searches on google, which seems to suggest the
exception is caused by the omission of the replay() method. However
their inclusion doesn't seem to change anything.
My updated methods are:
public void setUp() {
...
webRequest = createMock(WebRequest.class);
expect(webRequest.getSession(true)).andReturn(webSession);
replay();
webSession = webRequest.getSession(true);
verify();
...
}
public void testGetSaving(Product product) {
try
{
viewProductDetail.setProduct(product);
expect(viewProductDetail.getSaving()).andReturn(saving);
replay();
saving = viewProductDetail.getSaving();
verify();
assertEquals(saving, 0.02);
}
catch(RuntimeException e){
System.out.println(e.toString());
}
Thanks for any help
Ray
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
You still need to call the replay() / verify() easymock methods, which
can
be examined further here:
http://easymock.org/EasyMock2_2_Documentation.html
I think getSession(boolean) also returns a value - so you'd have to
define
what that return value is with a statement like:
expect(webRequest.getSession(true)).andReturn(session); (or
andReturn(null)
) .
On 6/1/07, Ray McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
We have recently upgrading one of our apps to Tapestry 4.1 and I have
been asked to write some unit tests for the existing components.
I am new to Tapestry, TestNG and Easymock, so please bear with me.
I am trying to get the test to run through an if statement, but I keep
getting the following runtime exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: missing behavior definition for the
preceeding method call getSession(true)
The class for the component is as follows:
public abstract class ViewProductDetail extends BaseComponent
{
@InjectObject(infrastructure:request)
public abstract WebRequest getRequest();
public abstract void setRequest(WebRequest webRequest);
@InjectState(visit)
public abstract Visit getSession();
public Double getSaving()
{
...
if(getRequest().getSession(false) != null)
{
Visit visit = getSession();
String discountcode = visit.getDiscountCode();
Double saving = new Double(rrp.getValue().doubleValue() -
price.getValue(discountcode).doubleValue());
return saving;
}
else
{
...
}
}
My Test class is as follows:
public class ViewProductDetailTest extends TestBase
{
...
@BeforeClass
public void setUp() {
viewProductDetail = newInstance(ViewProductDetail.class);
webRequest = createMock(WebRequest.class);
webRequest.getSession(true);
viewProductDetail.setRequest(webRequest);
}
@Test (dataProvider = CreateProduct)
public void testGetSaving(Product product) {
try
{
viewProductDetail.setProduct(product);
Double saving = viewProductDetail.getSaving();
assertEquals(saving, 0.02);
}
catch(RuntimeException e){
System.out.println(e.toString());
}
}
I'm not sure to the best way to create a session so that my if
statement
will be true. I'm trying to use webRequest.getSession(true), but it
doesnt seem to work and I don't know if there is a better way or if I
have missed something.
Thanks for any help
Ray
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit
RE: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App
I second that advice. After 30-45 minutes of following their online demo, you can have JMeter up and running and simulating dozens of users with form input, logins, etc. http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/ http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/index.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 9:17 AM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App I would highly recommend Jakarta JMeter. You can use it as a proxy to record some user actions, and then play back as many users as you want to simulate, and much more. -Greg -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dennis Sinelnikov Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:48 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App Hey guys, I have some performance requirements and would like to gather input from the tapestry community on what is the right approach. For example, how do I properly simulate X number of users? I have some UIs that require user input. I guess I can tailor http requests. Any guidance/links/tips/past experiences are greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dennis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App
Some tool that I like much more than Jmeter (although I have to admit that it is quite some time ago I last checked it) is Microsofts Web Application Stress Test tool. You can freely download and use it: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=E2C0585A-062A-4 39E-A67D-75A89AA36495displaylang=en Although it is from Microsoft, it is a really nice tool. Cheers, Detlef -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Montag, 27. November 2006 15:05 To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App I second that advice. After 30-45 minutes of following their online demo, you can have JMeter up and running and simulating dozens of users with form input, logins, etc. http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/ http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/index.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 9:17 AM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App I would highly recommend Jakarta JMeter. You can use it as a proxy to record some user actions, and then play back as many users as you want to simulate, and much more. -Greg -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dennis Sinelnikov Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:48 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App Hey guys, I have some performance requirements and would like to gather input from the tapestry community on what is the right approach. For example, how do I properly simulate X number of users? I have some UIs that require user input. I guess I can tailor http requests. Any guidance/links/tips/past experiences are greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dennis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App
As usual I recommend The Grinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/index.html --- Detlef Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some tool that I like much more than Jmeter (although I have to admit that it is quite some time ago I last checked it) is Microsofts Web Application Stress Test tool. You can freely download and use it: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=E2C0585A-062A-4 39E-A67D-75A89AA36495displaylang=en Although it is from Microsoft, it is a really nice tool. Cheers, Detlef -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Montag, 27. November 2006 15:05 To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App I second that advice. After 30-45 minutes of following their online demo, you can have JMeter up and running and simulating dozens of users with form input, logins, etc. http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/ http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/index.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 9:17 AM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App I would highly recommend Jakarta JMeter. You can use it as a proxy to record some user actions, and then play back as many users as you want to simulate, and much more. -Greg -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dennis Sinelnikov Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:48 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App Hey guys, I have some performance requirements and would like to gather input from the tapestry community on what is the right approach. For example, how do I properly simulate X number of users? I have some UIs that require user input. I guess I can tailor http requests. Any guidance/links/tips/past experiences are greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dennis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Konstantin Ignatyev PS: If this is a typical day on planet earth, humans will add fifteen million tons of carbon to the atmosphere, destroy 115 square miles of tropical rainforest, create seventy-two miles of desert, eliminate between forty to one hundred species, erode seventy-one million tons of topsoil, add 2,700 tons of CFCs to the stratosphere, and increase their population by 263,000 Bowers, C.A. The Culture of Denial: Why the Environmental Movement Needs a Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools. New York: State University of New York Press, 1997: (4) (5) (p.206) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App
I would highly recommend Jakarta JMeter. You can use it as a proxy to record some user actions, and then play back as many users as you want to simulate, and much more. -Greg -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dennis Sinelnikov Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:48 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App Hey guys, I have some performance requirements and would like to gather input from the tapestry community on what is the right approach. For example, how do I properly simulate X number of users? I have some UIs that require user input. I guess I can tailor http requests. Any guidance/links/tips/past experiences are greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dennis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App
s/gooble/gobble/g :) Dennis Sinelnikov wrote: Wow. This is great! Within couple hours I'm already running performance tests. Proxy would not be applicable to my environment right away b/c my server is ssl enabled, which makes sense because that would defeat the purpose of ssl encryption. I might use one of the firefox plugins to observe https requests. Thanks Greg! gooble gooble, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would highly recommend Jakarta JMeter. You can use it as a proxy to record some user actions, and then play back as many users as you want to simulate, and much more. -Greg -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dennis Sinelnikov Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:48 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Perfomance Testing Tapestry App Hey guys, I have some performance requirements and would like to gather input from the tapestry community on what is the right approach. For example, how do I properly simulate X number of users? I have some UIs that require user input. I guess I can tailor http requests. Any guidance/links/tips/past experiences are greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dennis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perfomance Testing Tapestry App
Hey guys, I have some performance requirements and would like to gather input from the tapestry community on what is the right approach. For example, how do I properly simulate X number of users? I have some UIs that require user input. I guess I can tailor http requests. Any guidance/links/tips/past experiences are greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dennis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Fwd: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Testing Tapestry]
FYI, for people using HtmlUnit with 4.1 and Tacos. Marc is the author of HtmlUnit. Forwarded Message From: Marc Guillemot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Testing Tapestry Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:01:10 +0100 I can't say anything on tapestry but htmlunit's AJAX support (and more generally javascript support) is continuously improved. Looking quickly on tapestry's mailing list I've seen some complaining about stuff that fail in htmlunit. Perhaps could it already be fixed if they would have reported it to the right place ;-( Marc. Dan Adams wrote: This is something I'm planning on doing but haven't done yet (which is why I'm still using tapestry 4 rather than 4.1). If you haven't already I'd suggest email the tapestry list as Jesse has done a bit of work in this area. On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 13:02 -0300, Rodrigo wrote: Hi, I'm new to HtmlUnit, and I'm having some trouble testing a Tapestry application, mainly with AJAX components. At first I couldn't make a page using XTile to work at all... I then, for a completely different reason, changed the user-language of the BrowserVersion (from en-us to es-ar) and xtile started working!... but... in my Xtile, in the receiving JavaScript function, I was doing a split of a string into an array, and THAT started to fail... instead of spliting at the character I said, it splitted every single character... I'm also having trouble with Tacos, it's not that important, because it's just an autocompleter, but of course it would be nice if it worked. Has anyone tried to test a Tapestry application using Xtile and/or Tacos? Is there anywhere where I could see some examples? DarkRodro - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Htmlunit-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Htmlunit-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user -- Dan Adams Senior Software Engineer Interactive Factory 617.235.5857 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Testing Tapestry]
I've been using HtmlUnit for the BeanForm integration tests. The one bug I encountered in HtmlUnit was patched within days. Of course, I'm not using any of the async stuff :-) Also FYI, I'm currently pushing to get the unit tests for some of the more popular JavaScript libraries integrated into the HtmlUnit builds... so for example HtmlUnit version X could by guaranteed to be compatible with Dojo version Y and Prototype version Z. On 11/10/06, Dan Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI, for people using HtmlUnit with 4.1 and Tacos. Marc is the author of HtmlUnit. Forwarded Message From: Marc Guillemot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Testing Tapestry Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:01:10 +0100 I can't say anything on tapestry but htmlunit's AJAX support (and more generally javascript support) is continuously improved. Looking quickly on tapestry's mailing list I've seen some complaining about stuff that fail in htmlunit. Perhaps could it already be fixed if they would have reported it to the right place ;-( Marc. Dan Adams wrote: This is something I'm planning on doing but haven't done yet (which is why I'm still using tapestry 4 rather than 4.1). If you haven't already I'd suggest email the tapestry list as Jesse has done a bit of work in this area. On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 13:02 -0300, Rodrigo wrote: Hi, I'm new to HtmlUnit, and I'm having some trouble testing a Tapestry application, mainly with AJAX components. At first I couldn't make a page using XTile to work at all... I then, for a completely different reason, changed the user-language of the BrowserVersion (from en-us to es-ar) and xtile started working!... but... in my Xtile, in the receiving JavaScript function, I was doing a split of a string into an array, and THAT started to fail... instead of spliting at the character I said, it splitted every single character... I'm also having trouble with Tacos, it's not that important, because it's just an autocompleter, but of course it would be nice if it worked. Has anyone tried to test a Tapestry application using Xtile and/or Tacos? Is there anywhere where I could see some examples? DarkRodro - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Htmlunit-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Htmlunit-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user -- Dan Adams Senior Software Engineer Interactive Factory 617.235.5857 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Testing Tapestry application
Haha .. alright : .. Thanks a bunch !! On 7/21/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't really take credit for it. All I did was move java files around to different places and made them use the testing infrastructure that Howard/the team had already created. You can use it now, just don't ask for documentation yet ;) http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/tapestry/tapestry-test/ On 7/20/06, KE Gan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jesse, Thanks a lot for the pointers!! And eagerly looking forward for the independent testing module that you will be making available :) Could you please make a announcement here once you did ? By the way, when can we expect it ;) ? Thanks again. On 7/21/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/tapestry-framework/src/test/ All ~ 1,500 unit tests in tapestry use the tapestry-testng module from howardlewisship.com. There should be enough in there for more complete examples :) I've also already broken the basic base unit test classes in tapestry out into a new maven project that I've deployed, just haven't genereated a site for it yet with documentation. Eventually, people should be able to use the same testing resources tapestry developers do to test their own components/pages. On 7/20/06, KE Gan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have been coding Tapestry for a few months now. It is really nice to work with, especially with Hivemind tightly integrated ... hence I get to easily unit test my POJOs (domain objects, etc). However, I still have problem unit testing the Tapestry pages of the application. I did try to use HtmlUnit, but that that's more like integration testing. It requires the tomcat and database server to be running. I am wondering what are other Tapestry users are doing to unit testing Tapestry pages without need to use the servlet container ? This would make development much faster! I read a bit here and there about using TestNG + EasyMock [tapestry-testng] ( http://howardlewisship.com/tapestry-javaforge/tapestry-testng/index.html ). It seems to be what I am looking for (am I right?), but I cannot find any example about how to using it, or much documentation of how to go about that either. I greatly appreciate if fellow Tapestry users can give some pointers. By the way, what is the development status of tapestry-testng ? Seems like still a 'snapshot' release? When can we see a full release with Tapestry? Thanks. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: Testing Tapestry application
Here, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/tapestry-framework/src/test/ All ~ 1,500 unit tests in tapestry use the tapestry-testng module from howardlewisship.com. There should be enough in there for more complete examples :) I've also already broken the basic base unit test classes in tapestry out into a new maven project that I've deployed, just haven't genereated a site for it yet with documentation. Eventually, people should be able to use the same testing resources tapestry developers do to test their own components/pages. On 7/20/06, KE Gan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have been coding Tapestry for a few months now. It is really nice to work with, especially with Hivemind tightly integrated ... hence I get to easily unit test my POJOs (domain objects, etc). However, I still have problem unit testing the Tapestry pages of the application. I did try to use HtmlUnit, but that that's more like integration testing. It requires the tomcat and database server to be running. I am wondering what are other Tapestry users are doing to unit testing Tapestry pages without need to use the servlet container ? This would make development much faster! I read a bit here and there about using TestNG + EasyMock [tapestry-testng] ( http://howardlewisship.com/tapestry-javaforge/tapestry-testng/index.html). It seems to be what I am looking for (am I right?), but I cannot find any example about how to using it, or much documentation of how to go about that either. I greatly appreciate if fellow Tapestry users can give some pointers. By the way, what is the development status of tapestry-testng ? Seems like still a 'snapshot' release? When can we see a full release with Tapestry? Thanks. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: Testing Tapestry application
Jesse, Thanks a lot for the pointers!! And eagerly looking forward for the independent testing module that you will be making available :) Could you please make a announcement here once you did ? By the way, when can we expect it ;) ? Thanks again. On 7/21/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/tapestry-framework/src/test/ All ~ 1,500 unit tests in tapestry use the tapestry-testng module from howardlewisship.com. There should be enough in there for more complete examples :) I've also already broken the basic base unit test classes in tapestry out into a new maven project that I've deployed, just haven't genereated a site for it yet with documentation. Eventually, people should be able to use the same testing resources tapestry developers do to test their own components/pages. On 7/20/06, KE Gan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have been coding Tapestry for a few months now. It is really nice to work with, especially with Hivemind tightly integrated ... hence I get to easily unit test my POJOs (domain objects, etc). However, I still have problem unit testing the Tapestry pages of the application. I did try to use HtmlUnit, but that that's more like integration testing. It requires the tomcat and database server to be running. I am wondering what are other Tapestry users are doing to unit testing Tapestry pages without need to use the servlet container ? This would make development much faster! I read a bit here and there about using TestNG + EasyMock [tapestry-testng] ( http://howardlewisship.com/tapestry-javaforge/tapestry-testng/index.html ). It seems to be what I am looking for (am I right?), but I cannot find any example about how to using it, or much documentation of how to go about that either. I greatly appreciate if fellow Tapestry users can give some pointers. By the way, what is the development status of tapestry-testng ? Seems like still a 'snapshot' release? When can we see a full release with Tapestry? Thanks. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: Testing Tapestry application
I can't really take credit for it. All I did was move java files around to different places and made them use the testing infrastructure that Howard/the team had already created. You can use it now, just don't ask for documentation yet ;) http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/tapestry/tapestry-test/ On 7/20/06, KE Gan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jesse, Thanks a lot for the pointers!! And eagerly looking forward for the independent testing module that you will be making available :) Could you please make a announcement here once you did ? By the way, when can we expect it ;) ? Thanks again. On 7/21/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/tapestry-framework/src/test/ All ~ 1,500 unit tests in tapestry use the tapestry-testng module from howardlewisship.com. There should be enough in there for more complete examples :) I've also already broken the basic base unit test classes in tapestry out into a new maven project that I've deployed, just haven't genereated a site for it yet with documentation. Eventually, people should be able to use the same testing resources tapestry developers do to test their own components/pages. On 7/20/06, KE Gan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have been coding Tapestry for a few months now. It is really nice to work with, especially with Hivemind tightly integrated ... hence I get to easily unit test my POJOs (domain objects, etc). However, I still have problem unit testing the Tapestry pages of the application. I did try to use HtmlUnit, but that that's more like integration testing. It requires the tomcat and database server to be running. I am wondering what are other Tapestry users are doing to unit testing Tapestry pages without need to use the servlet container ? This would make development much faster! I read a bit here and there about using TestNG + EasyMock [tapestry-testng] ( http://howardlewisship.com/tapestry-javaforge/tapestry-testng/index.html ). It seems to be what I am looking for (am I right?), but I cannot find any example about how to using it, or much documentation of how to go about that either. I greatly appreciate if fellow Tapestry users can give some pointers. By the way, what is the development status of tapestry-testng ? Seems like still a 'snapshot' release? When can we see a full release with Tapestry? Thanks. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
