Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-25 Thread Nell J Chenault
Gary Handman (UCB) and Chris Lewis (AU) shared lists of titles which they
found to be out of print ... a few years ago.  I will try to find in the
archives later today and post ... off to a meeting.

Caveat:  some may have come back into distribution during the last few
years.

Nell Chenault
VCU Libraries


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu wrote:

  Dear colleagues:

 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials
 held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced.
 Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we
 will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.

 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching”
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.

 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.

 Best,

 Karen E.K. Brown

 Head, Preservation Department

 University at Albany Libraries

 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310

 Albany, NY 1

 Tel. (518) 437 3923









 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-25 Thread Nell J Chenault
Below are some useful list from discussion of weeding and conversion
assessment, Aug. 2011

On Behalf Of Chris Lewis
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:19 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] VHS ONLY updates?

Just back from vacation but yes I started a wiki called Classics not on
DVD. It's far from perfect and hard to keep up to date but here it is:
http://classicsnotondvd.wikispaces.com/;
 ___

Gary Handman's UCB VHS Only list:  see attachment




It may go without saying, but...I'd definitely focus on non-fiction film first
(maybe exclusively).

When approaching feature (i.e. non-fiction), start with foreign language films
first.

Distributors that are no longer in business:

   Films Incorporated
   Time-Life Film and Video
   Coronet Films (mostly)
   Carousel Films
   CRM Films
   National Latino Communications Center (NLCC)
   Drift Distribution
   International Film Bureau
   International Media Resource Exchange (IMRE)

University of California Center for Media and Independent Learning (note:
some titles in this catalog are still distributed by Berkeley Media LLC)

Likely to be Out of Distribution

PBS Home Video/PBS Video:  films with release dates before 2000
Annenberg/CPB Project pre-2000 CPB
New Yorker Film and Video (feature films)

Anything distributed by a non-profit organizations, or academic institutions
(e.g American Mathematical Assn.) pre-2000

Available for re-purchase on VHS only (and therefor not eligible for Section
108 copying)

Roland Films on Art (many titles in this catalog only available on VHS)
Lannan Foundation Video Library (available on VHS only)

_

Nell Chenault
VCU Libraries



On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Nell J Chenault njche...@vcu.edu wrote:

 Gary Handman (UCB) and Chris Lewis (AU) shared lists of titles which they
 found to be out of print ... a few years ago.  I will try to find in the
 archives later today and post ... off to a meeting.

 Caveat:  some may have come back into distribution during the last few
 years.

 Nell Chenault
 VCU Libraries


 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:

  Dear colleagues:

 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS
 materials held in our general collection, all of which was commercially
 produced. Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not
 available we will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider
 reformatting.

 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching”
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.

 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.

 Best,

 Karen E.K. Brown

 Head, Preservation Department

 University at Albany Libraries

 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310

 Albany, NY 1

 Tel. (518) 437 3923









 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.





VHS only-8.doc
Description: MS-Word document
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-25 Thread Shannon Spurlock
Hi Nell

In relation to your point below, you can license the entire Roland Films on
Art collection from Kanopy:
http://www.kanopystreaming.com/channel/roland-collection-films-art. Please
feel free to reach out to me for more information.

Best wishes

Shannon

Shannon Spurlock
Sales and Marketing - Kanopy
3230 Scott Street, San Francisco, CA 94123.

 t (+1) 415 926 5293
*www.kanopystreaming.com* http://www.kanopystreaming.com *-* Revolutionizing
educational video





On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nell J Chenault njche...@vcu.edu wrote:

 Below are some useful list from discussion of weeding and conversion
 assessment, Aug. 2011

 On Behalf Of Chris Lewis
 Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:19 PM
 To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 Subject: Re: [Videolib] VHS ONLY updates?

 Just back from vacation but yes I started a wiki called Classics not on
 DVD. It's far from perfect and hard to keep up to date but here it is:
 http://classicsnotondvd.wikispaces.com/;
  ___

 Gary Handman's UCB VHS Only list:  see attachment


 

 It may go without saying, but...I'd definitely focus on non-fiction film 
 first
 (maybe exclusively).

 When approaching feature (i.e. non-fiction), start with foreign language films
 first.

 Distributors that are no longer in business:

Films Incorporated
Time-Life Film and Video
Coronet Films (mostly)
Carousel Films
CRM Films
National Latino Communications Center (NLCC)
Drift Distribution
International Film Bureau
International Media Resource Exchange (IMRE)

 University of California Center for Media and Independent Learning (note:
 some titles in this catalog are still distributed by Berkeley Media LLC)

 Likely to be Out of Distribution

 PBS Home Video/PBS Video:  films with release dates before 2000
 Annenberg/CPB Project pre-2000 CPB
 New Yorker Film and Video (feature films)

 Anything distributed by a non-profit organizations, or academic institutions
 (e.g American Mathematical Assn.) pre-2000

 Available for re-purchase on VHS only (and therefor not eligible for Section
 108 copying)

 Roland Films on Art (many titles in this catalog only available on VHS)
 Lannan Foundation Video Library (available on VHS only)

 _

 Nell Chenault
 VCU Libraries



 On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Nell J Chenault njche...@vcu.edu wrote:

 Gary Handman (UCB) and Chris Lewis (AU) shared lists of titles which they
 found to be out of print ... a few years ago.  I will try to find in the
 archives later today and post ... off to a meeting.

 Caveat:  some may have come back into distribution during the last few
 years.

 Nell Chenault
 VCU Libraries


  On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:

   Dear colleagues:

 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS
 materials held in our general collection, all of which was commercially
 produced. Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not
 available we will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider
 reformatting.

 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have video copyright searching
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.

 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.

 Best,

 Karen E.K. Brown

 Head, Preservation Department

 University at Albany Libraries

 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310

 Albany, NY 1

 Tel. (518) 437 3923









 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.




 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-25 Thread Nell J Chenault
Yes, a lot has changed in 3 years!


On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Shannon Spurlock 
shannon.spurl...@kanopystreaming.com wrote:

 Hi Nell

 In relation to your point below, you can license the entire Roland Films
 on Art collection from Kanopy:
 http://www.kanopystreaming.com/channel/roland-collection-films-art.
 Please feel free to reach out to me for more information.

 Best wishes

 Shannon

 Shannon Spurlock
 Sales and Marketing - Kanopy
 3230 Scott Street, San Francisco, CA 94123.

  t (+1) 415 926 5293
 *www.kanopystreaming.com* http://www.kanopystreaming.com *-* Revolutionizing
 educational video





 On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nell J Chenault njche...@vcu.edu
 wrote:

 Below are some useful list from discussion of weeding and conversion
 assessment, Aug. 2011

 On Behalf Of Chris Lewis
 Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:19 PM
 To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 Subject: Re: [Videolib] VHS ONLY updates?

 Just back from vacation but yes I started a wiki called Classics not on
 DVD. It's far from perfect and hard to keep up to date but here it is:
 http://classicsnotondvd.wikispaces.com/;
  ___

 Gary Handman's UCB VHS Only list:  see attachment


 

 It may go without saying, but...I'd definitely focus on non-fiction film 
 first
 (maybe exclusively).

 When approaching feature (i.e. non-fiction), start with foreign language 
 films
 first.

 Distributors that are no longer in business:

Films Incorporated
Time-Life Film and Video
Coronet Films (mostly)
Carousel Films
CRM Films
National Latino Communications Center (NLCC)
Drift Distribution
International Film Bureau
International Media Resource Exchange (IMRE)

 University of California Center for Media and Independent Learning (note:
 some titles in this catalog are still distributed by Berkeley Media LLC)

 Likely to be Out of Distribution

 PBS Home Video/PBS Video:  films with release dates before 2000
 Annenberg/CPB Project pre-2000 CPB
 New Yorker Film and Video (feature films)

 Anything distributed by a non-profit organizations, or academic institutions
 (e.g American Mathematical Assn.) pre-2000

 Available for re-purchase on VHS only (and therefor not eligible for Section
 108 copying)

 Roland Films on Art (many titles in this catalog only available on VHS)
 Lannan Foundation Video Library (available on VHS only)

 _

 Nell Chenault
 VCU Libraries



 On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Nell J Chenault njche...@vcu.edu
 wrote:

 Gary Handman (UCB) and Chris Lewis (AU) shared lists of titles which
 they found to be out of print ... a few years ago.  I will try to find in
 the archives later today and post ... off to a meeting.

 Caveat:  some may have come back into distribution during the last few
 years.

 Nell Chenault
 VCU Libraries


  On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:

   Dear colleagues:

 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS
 materials held in our general collection, all of which was commercially
 produced. Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not
 available we will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider
 reformatting.

 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching”
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.

 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.

 Best,

 Karen E.K. Brown

 Head, Preservation Department

 University at Albany Libraries

 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310

 Albany, NY 1

 Tel. (518) 437 3923









 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.




 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.



 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 

Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-25 Thread Lisa Wakefield
As a newbie to this list (which I heard about at the excellent Video Roundtable 
session at ALA) and to video librarianship, I appreciate the useful information 
contained in this discussion. I was not aware of the significant costs incurred 
to convert formats.  Our library as well has had the discussion of how to 
replace/discard/reformat VHS holdings. In fact, our penultimate VHS player was 
carted out to the dumpster last year, pleading for clemency, over futile 
protests from our Tech Services team. The only player that remains is in a 
study carrel in the library, not particularly useful for classroom presentation.

Does anyone have comments/suggestions on the conversion implications based on 
Canadian copyright law?


Lisa Wakefield
Library Multimedia  Cataloguing Assistant | Library Information Common
Red Deer College | 100 College Blvd | Box 5005 | Red Deer | Alberta | T4N 5H5
work 403.342-3352 | fax 403.346.8500
www.rdc.ab.ca | when you get here you understand

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Jessica Rosner
Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code
definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you
are weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in
the neck to use   the law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS
copies that are 30 years old and just fine and would a lot worse if I
transferred them to digital format.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu wrote:

  Dear colleagues:

 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials
 held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced.
 Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we
 will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.

 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching”
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.

 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.

 Best,

 Karen E.K. Brown

 Head, Preservation Department

 University at Albany Libraries

 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310

 Albany, NY 1

 Tel. (518) 437 3923









 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Brown, Karen E
Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and use that 
items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that most of our 
patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our classrooms. The 
material, as a result, is not being used. Those that are consist of off-beat 
titles that aren’t the major candidates for publishers to migrate forward to a 
more popular media. These, and the so-called “orphan works”, will be our 
biggest challenge in clearing permissions to reformat.

Best, Karen

From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code 
definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you are 
weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in the 
neck to use   the law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS copies 
that are 30 years old and just fine and would a lot worse if I transferred them 
to digital format.

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E 
kebr...@albany.edumailto:kebr...@albany.edu wrote:
Dear colleagues:
The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials held 
in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced. Regarding 
those titles for which a more current format is not available we will need to 
obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.
We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have worked 
through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching” 
documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist us.
Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
Best,
Karen E.K. Brown
Head, Preservation Department
University at Albany Libraries
1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
Albany, NY 1
Tel. (518) 437 3923tel:%28518%29%20437%203923





VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Jessica Rosner
the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS
titles it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the
enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in digital format. In theory
libraries say they will be only to glad to upgrade to a legal copy if one
is released but in reality rights holders can't count on that. Ironically I
think this is pushing some rights holders to have titles only available via
stream or download which libraries hate.

 Also the law is VERY clear that if you make copies they may not ever be
checked  out for home use and there is an intense debate ( focusing on
the definition of premise) if they may in fact ever leave the library to
be used in a classroom.




On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu wrote:

  Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and
 use that items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that
 most of our patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our
 classrooms. The material, as a result, is not being used. Those that are
 consist of off-beat titles that aren’t the major candidates for publishers
 to migrate forward to a more popular media. These, and the so-called
 “orphan works”, will be our biggest challenge in clearing permissions to
 reformat.



 Best, Karen



 *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
 videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jessica Rosner
 *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
 *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape



 Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code
 definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you
 are weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in
 the neck to use   the law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS
 copies that are 30 years old and just fine and would a lot worse if I
 transferred them to digital format.



 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:

 Dear colleagues:

 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials
 held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced.
 Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we
 will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.

 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching”
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.

 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.

 Best,

 Karen E.K. Brown

 Head, Preservation Department

 University at Albany Libraries

 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310

 Albany, NY 1

 Tel. (518) 437 3923










 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.



 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Matt Ball
Karen,

Although Howard Besser and Walter Forsberg's work on the Video at Risk project 
mostly had to do with reformatting deteriorating VHS, there may still be useful 
information here about how they went about searching for and contacting 
copyright holders.

http://www.nyu.edu/tisch/preservation/research/video-risk/
http://www.nyu.edu/tisch/preservation/research/video-risk/VideoAtRisk_SECTION108_Guidelines_2013.pdf
 

Cheers,

Matt

___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
mb...@paceacademy.org


videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:
Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and use 
that items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that most of 
our patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our classrooms. 
The material, as
a result, is not being used. Those that are consist of off-beat titles that 
aren’t the major candidates for publishers to migrate forward to a more 
popular media. These, and the so-called “orphan works”, will be our biggest 
challenge in
clearing permissions to reformat.
 
Best, Karen
 
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape
 


Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code 
definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you are 
weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in the 
neck to use   the
law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS copies that are 30 years 
old and just fine and would a lot worse if I transferred them to digital 
format.


 


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E [ mailto:kebr...@albany.edu 
]kebr...@albany.edu wrote:


Dear colleagues: 
The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials 
held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced. 
Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we 
will need to obtain
copyright clearance before we consider reformatting. 
We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have worked 
through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching” 
documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist us.  
Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
Best, 
Karen E.K. Brown
Head, Preservation Department
University at Albany Libraries
1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
Albany, NY 1
Tel. [ tel:%28518%29%20437%203923 ](518) 437 3923
 
 
 
 



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions.
It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video 
librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.


 



___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
mb...@paceacademy.org

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Matt Ball
Just curious about the enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in digital 
format, how much does it cost to burn a DVD from one's computer?

Matt

___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
mb...@paceacademy.org


videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:
the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS titles 
it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the enormous cost of 
putting smaller titles out in digital format. In theory libraries say they 
will be only to
glad to upgrade to a legal copy if one is released but in reality rights 
holders can't count on that. Ironically I think this is pushing some rights 
holders to have titles only available via stream or download which libraries 
hate.


 Also the law is VERY clear that if you make copies they may not ever be 
checked  out for home use and there is an intense debate ( focusing on the 
definition of premise) if they may in fact ever leave the library to be used 
in a classroom.






On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Brown, Karen E [ mailto:kebr...@albany.edu 
]kebr...@albany.edu wrote:




Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and use 
that items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that most of 
our patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our classrooms. 
The material, as
a result, is not being used. Those that are consist of off-beat titles that 
aren’t the major candidates for publishers to migrate forward to a more 
popular media. These, and the so-called “orphan works”, will be our biggest 
challenge in
clearing permissions to reformat.
 
Best, Karen
 
From: [ mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
]videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:[ 
mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
]videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
To: [ mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu ]videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape


 


Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code 
definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you are 
weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in the 
neck to use   the
law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS copies that are 30 years 
old and just fine and would a lot worse if I transferred them to digital 
format.


 


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E [ mailto:kebr...@albany.edu 
]kebr...@albany.edu wrote:


Dear colleagues: 
The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials 
held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced. 
Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we 
will need to obtain
copyright clearance before we consider reformatting. 
We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have worked 
through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching” 
documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist us.  
Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
Best, 
Karen E.K. Brown
Head, Preservation Department
University at Albany Libraries
1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
Albany, NY 1
Tel. [ tel:%28518%29%20437%203923 ](518) 437 3923
 
 
 
 



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions.
It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video 
librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.


 


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions.
It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video 
librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.






___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
mb...@paceacademy.org

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Jessica Rosner
Seriously Matt? Dennis is MUCH better at this. But you have to go back to
the original material often 35mm fillm elements do a decent new transfer,
box it, promote it etc. The whole point of digital is to get high quality
looking material. If one just took some old VHS master and dubbed it , it
would hideous and strange as it may seem filmmakers and distributors really
want their stuff to look good. Oh and I completely forgot PAYING FOR THE
RIGHTS including the possibility of re licensing expensive music. Ask
Dennis how much has been spent on things like KILLER OF SHEEP, Shirley
Clark films etc.

I remember a now forgotten doc I really liked that had long fallen out of
distribution. I asked Kino to check into it, and it was now owned by
reasonably friendly French rights holder but between licensing and
production you were probably looking at 20 grand and it was a small title
but also one that would have been pirated the day it became available.

Imagine trying to put small films out in the increasingly decreasing DVD
market, it almost impossible just to cover costs.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Matt Ball mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:

   Just curious about the enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in
 digital format, how much does it cost to burn a DVD from one's computer?

 Matt

 ___
 Matt Ball
 Director, Woodruff Library
 Pace Academy
 966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
 Atlanta, GA  30327
 mb...@paceacademy.org


 *videolib@lists.berkeley.edu videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:*
 the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS
 titles it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the
 enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in digital format. In theory
 libraries say they will be only to glad to upgrade to a legal copy if one
 is released but in reality rights holders can't count on that. Ironically I
 think this is pushing some rights holders to have titles only available via
 stream or download which libraries hate.


  Also the law is VERY clear that if you make copies they may not ever be
 checked  out for home use and there is an intense debate ( focusing on
 the definition of premise) if they may in fact ever leave the library to
 be used in a classroom.






 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:




 Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and use
 that items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that most of
 our patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our
 classrooms. The material, as a result, is not being used. Those that are
 consist of off-beat titles that aren’t the major candidates for publishers
 to migrate forward to a more popular media. These, and the so-called
 “orphan works”, will be our biggest challenge in clearing permissions to
 reformat.

 Best, Karen

 *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
 videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jessica Rosner
 *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
 *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape





 Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code
 definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you
 are weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in
 the neck to use   the law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS
 copies that are 30 years old and just fine and would a lot worse if I
 transferred them to digital format.





 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:


 Dear colleagues:
 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials
 held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced.
 Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we
 will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.
 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching”
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.
 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
 Best,
 Karen E.K. Brown
 Head, Preservation Department
 University at Albany Libraries
 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
 Albany, NY 1
 Tel. (518) 437 3923







 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.





 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation

Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Brown, Karen E
Good point. Stream or download are fine, depending on the terms of use!!! Or 
did I just open another pickle jar.   (:


From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:47 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS titles 
it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the enormous cost of 
putting smaller titles out in digital format. In theory libraries say they will 
be only to glad to upgrade to a legal copy if one is released but in reality 
rights holders can't count on that. Ironically I think this is pushing some 
rights holders to have titles only available via stream or download which 
libraries hate.

 Also the law is VERY clear that if you make copies they may not ever be 
checked  out for home use and there is an intense debate ( focusing on the 
definition of premise) if they may in fact ever leave the library to be used 
in a classroom.



On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Brown, Karen E 
kebr...@albany.edumailto:kebr...@albany.edu wrote:
Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and use that 
items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that most of our 
patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our classrooms. The 
material, as a result, is not being used. Those that are consist of off-beat 
titles that aren’t the major candidates for publishers to migrate forward to a 
more popular media. These, and the so-called “orphan works”, will be our 
biggest challenge in clearing permissions to reformat.

Best, Karen

From: 
videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edumailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edumailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu]
 On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edumailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code 
definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you are 
weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in the 
neck to use   the law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS copies 
that are 30 years old and just fine and would a lot worse if I transferred them 
to digital format.

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E 
kebr...@albany.edumailto:kebr...@albany.edu wrote:
Dear colleagues:
The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials held 
in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced. Regarding 
those titles for which a more current format is not available we will need to 
obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.
We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have worked 
through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching” 
documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist us.
Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
Best,
Karen E.K. Brown
Head, Preservation Department
University at Albany Libraries
1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
Albany, NY 1
Tel. (518) 437 3923tel:%28518%29%20437%203923





VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Matt Ball
Libraries don't have VCRs anymore.  A video that no one can watch might as well 
not exist.  I would rather have a crappy VHS-to-DVD copy than nothing at all.  
And I'm willing to pay for it.

Also, it's just a matter of time before VHS is an official obsolete format and 
then, as my mom would say, Katy, bar the door!   It might be to filmakers' 
advantage to get out in front of that eventuality.

Matt


videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:
Seriously Matt? Dennis is MUCH better at this. But you have to go back to the 
original material often 35mm fillm elements do a decent new transfer, box it, 
promote it etc. The whole point of digital is to get high quality looking 
material. If one
just took some old VHS master and dubbed it , it would hideous and strange as 
it may seem filmmakers and distributors really want their stuff to look good. 
Oh and I completely forgot PAYING FOR THE RIGHTS including the possibility of 
re licensing
expensive music. Ask Dennis how much has been spent on things like KILLER OF 
SHEEP, Shirley Clark films etc.


I remember a now forgotten doc I really liked that had long fallen out of 
distribution. I asked Kino to check into it, and it was now owned by 
reasonably friendly French rights holder but between licensing and production 
you were probably looking
at 20 grand and it was a small title but also one that would have been pirated 
the day it became available. 


Imagine trying to put small films out in the increasingly decreasing DVD 
market, it almost impossible just to cover costs.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Matt Ball [ mailto:mb...@paceacademy.org 
]mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:


  
Just curious about the enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in digital 
format, how much does it cost to burn a DVD from one's computer?

Matt

___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
[ mailto:mb...@paceacademy.org ]mb...@paceacademy.org


[ mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu ]videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:
the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS titles 
it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the enormous cost of 
putting smaller titles out in digital format. In theory libraries say they 
will be only to
glad to upgrade to a legal copy if one is released but in reality rights 
holders can't count on that. Ironically I think this is pushing some rights 
holders to have titles only available via stream or download which libraries 
hate.


 Also the law is VERY clear that if you make copies they may not ever be 
checked  out for home use and there is an intense debate ( focusing on the 
definition of premise) if they may in fact ever leave the library to be used 
in a classroom.






On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Brown, Karen E [ mailto:kebr...@albany.edu 
]kebr...@albany.edu wrote:




Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and use 
that items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that most of 
our patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our classrooms. 
The material, as
a result, is not being used. Those that are consist of off-beat titles that 
aren’t the major candidates for publishers to migrate forward to a more 
popular media. These, and the so-called “orphan works”, will be our biggest 
challenge in
clearing permissions to reformat.
 
Best, Karen
 
From: [ mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
]videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:[ 
mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
]videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
To: [ mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu ]videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape


 


Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code 
definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you are 
weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in the 
neck to use   the
law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS copies that are 30 years 
old and just fine and would a lot worse if I transferred them to digital 
format.


 


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E [ mailto:kebr...@albany.edu 
]kebr...@albany.edu wrote:


Dear colleagues: 
The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials 
held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced. 
Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we 
will need to obtain
copyright clearance before we consider reformatting. 
We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have worked 
through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching” 
documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist us.  
Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
Best, 
Karen E.K. Brown
Head, Preservation Department
University

Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Jessica Rosner
If it is an educational doc with little interest in visuals you might get
some people  to OK a transfer but it like showing a black and white
photocopy of the Mona Lisa in an art house to dub an old VHS to DVD. It is
both deeply insulting to the people who made the films and illegal.

I would not kill VHS off that fast. As long as players are


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Matt Ball mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:

   Libraries don't have VCRs anymore.  A video that no one can watch might
 as well not exist.  I would rather have a crappy VHS-to-DVD copy than
 nothing at all.  And I'm willing to pay for it.

 Also, it's just a matter of time before VHS is an official obsolete format
 and then, as my mom would say, Katy, bar the door!   It might be to
 filmakers' advantage to get out in front of that eventuality.

 Matt


 *videolib@lists.berkeley.edu videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:*
 Seriously Matt? Dennis is MUCH better at this. But you have to go back to
 the original material often 35mm fillm elements do a decent new transfer,
 box it, promote it etc. The whole point of digital is to get high quality
 looking material. If one just took some old VHS master and dubbed it , it
 would hideous and strange as it may seem filmmakers and distributors really
 want their stuff to look good. Oh and I completely forgot PAYING FOR THE
 RIGHTS including the possibility of re licensing expensive music. Ask
 Dennis how much has been spent on things like KILLER OF SHEEP, Shirley
 Clark films etc.


 I remember a now forgotten doc I really liked that had long fallen out of
 distribution. I asked Kino to check into it, and it was now owned by
 reasonably friendly French rights holder but between licensing and
 production you were probably looking at 20 grand and it was a small title
 but also one that would have been pirated the day it became available.


 Imagine trying to put small films out in the increasingly decreasing DVD
 market, it almost impossible just to cover costs.


 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Matt Ball mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:



 Just curious about the enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in
 digital format, how much does it cost to burn a DVD from one's computer?

 Matt

 ___
 Matt Ball
 Director, Woodruff Library
 Pace Academy
 966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
 Atlanta, GA  30327
 mb...@paceacademy.org


 *videolib@lists.berkeley.edu* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu* writes:*
 the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS
 titles it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the
 enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in digital format. In theory
 libraries say they will be only to glad to upgrade to a legal copy if one
 is released but in reality rights holders can't count on that. Ironically I
 think this is pushing some rights holders to have titles only available via
 stream or download which libraries hate.


  Also the law is VERY clear that if you make copies they may not ever be
 checked  out for home use and there is an intense debate ( focusing on
 the definition of premise) if they may in fact ever leave the library to
 be used in a classroom.






 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:




 Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and use
 that items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that most of
 our patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our
 classrooms. The material, as a result, is not being used. Those that are
 consist of off-beat titles that aren’t the major candidates for publishers
 to migrate forward to a more popular media. These, and the so-called
 “orphan works”, will be our biggest challenge in clearing permissions to
 reformat.

 Best, Karen

 *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
 videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jessica Rosner
 *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
 *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape





 Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code
 definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you
 are weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in
 the neck to use   the law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS
 copies that are 30 years old and just fine and would a lot worse if I
 transferred them to digital format.





 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:


 Dear colleagues:
 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials
 held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced.
 Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we
 will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.
 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project

Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Jessica Rosner
OOPS hid send WAY to early on that last one. VHS players are a pain in the
ass but it is financial and convenience concern to dump them. They still
work and the law recognizes them as a valid format so until you can't get
one as oppossed to dumping the ones you have you have no right to make a
copy because it is a pain the ass.

I am more startled though at your lack of understanding of how much time,
money and resources  (not to mention rights) are involved in making good
DVD, blu ray or streaming copies of video material. Filmmakers and those of
us who work with them take this very seriously. It is a VISUAL art not just
some crap to dub a cheap washed out copy of.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Jessica Rosner maddux2...@gmail.com
wrote:

 If it is an educational doc with little interest in visuals you might get
 some people  to OK a transfer but it like showing a black and white
 photocopy of the Mona Lisa in an art house to dub an old VHS to DVD. It is
 both deeply insulting to the people who made the films and illegal.

 I would not kill VHS off that fast. As long as players are


 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Matt Ball mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:

   Libraries don't have VCRs anymore.  A video that no one can watch
 might as well not exist.  I would rather have a crappy VHS-to-DVD copy than
 nothing at all.  And I'm willing to pay for it.

 Also, it's just a matter of time before VHS is an official obsolete
 format and then, as my mom would say, Katy, bar the door!   It might be
 to filmakers' advantage to get out in front of that eventuality.

 Matt


 *videolib@lists.berkeley.edu videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:*
 Seriously Matt? Dennis is MUCH better at this. But you have to go back to
 the original material often 35mm fillm elements do a decent new transfer,
 box it, promote it etc. The whole point of digital is to get high quality
 looking material. If one just took some old VHS master and dubbed it , it
 would hideous and strange as it may seem filmmakers and distributors really
 want their stuff to look good. Oh and I completely forgot PAYING FOR THE
 RIGHTS including the possibility of re licensing expensive music. Ask
 Dennis how much has been spent on things like KILLER OF SHEEP, Shirley
 Clark films etc.


 I remember a now forgotten doc I really liked that had long fallen out of
 distribution. I asked Kino to check into it, and it was now owned by
 reasonably friendly French rights holder but between licensing and
 production you were probably looking at 20 grand and it was a small title
 but also one that would have been pirated the day it became available.


 Imagine trying to put small films out in the increasingly decreasing DVD
 market, it almost impossible just to cover costs.


 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Matt Ball mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:



 Just curious about the enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in
 digital format, how much does it cost to burn a DVD from one's computer?

 Matt

 ___
 Matt Ball
 Director, Woodruff Library
 Pace Academy
 966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
 Atlanta, GA  30327
 mb...@paceacademy.org


 *videolib@lists.berkeley.edu* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu* writes:*
 the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS
 titles it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the
 enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in digital format. In theory
 libraries say they will be only to glad to upgrade to a legal copy if one
 is released but in reality rights holders can't count on that. Ironically I
 think this is pushing some rights holders to have titles only available via
 stream or download which libraries hate.


  Also the law is VERY clear that if you make copies they may not ever be
 checked  out for home use and there is an intense debate ( focusing on
 the definition of premise) if they may in fact ever leave the library to
 be used in a classroom.






 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:




 Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and
 use that items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that
 most of our patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our
 classrooms. The material, as a result, is not being used. Those that are
 consist of off-beat titles that aren’t the major candidates for publishers
 to migrate forward to a more popular media. These, and the so-called
 “orphan works”, will be our biggest challenge in clearing permissions to
 reformat.

 Best, Karen

 *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
 videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jessica Rosner
 *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
 *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape





 Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code
 definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you
 are weeding

Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Susan Albrecht
That’s way too broad of a statement, Matt.
We do, indeed, have VCRs here, as well as an RTI machine to continue to service 
our VHS tapes.  We even (gasp!) still have VCRs in several classrooms.  A 
faculty or staff member needing to reserve a room for a screening can even do a 
search of our campus scheduler *based upon availability of that piece of 
equipment.*  YES, I had to advocate with our IT department to keep these, and 
I’m sure the time will come when very few people are available to service the 
units, but to me it’s being a really lousy steward of our collection to just 
toss ‘em out because they’re not the format du jour.
For what it’s worth, we still have a typewriter here in the library, too. ☺
Susan
Susan Albrecht
Library Media Acquisitions Manager
Graduate Fellowship Advisor
Wabash College Lilly Library
765-361-6216
765-361-6295 fax
albre...@wabash.edumailto:albre...@wabash.edu
www.facebook.com/wabashcollegelibrary.filmshttp://www.facebook.com/wabashcollegelibrary.films
http://pinterest.com/wabashcolllib/

***
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. --Neil Peart
***

From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Matt Ball
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 3:09 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

Libraries don't have VCRs anymore.  A video that no one can watch might as well 
not exist.  I would rather have a crappy VHS-to-DVD copy than nothing at all.  
And I'm willing to pay for it.

Also, it's just a matter of time before VHS is an official obsolete format and 
then, as my mom would say, Katy, bar the door!   It might be to filmakers' 
advantage to get out in front of that eventuality.

Matt
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Kankiewicz, Michael
We have four VHS players in the library, and most of our classrooms are still 
equipped with them (at least for now).  We still have several hundred titles on 
VHS and many are used regularly.
Michael
 ---
Michael Kankiewicz
Manager, Silverman Multimedia Center
221 Capen Hall
University at Buffalo
Buffalo, NY  14260

P  716-645-1329
F  716-645-3710
e  
micha...@buffalo.edumailto:micha...@buffalo.edu

From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Matt Ball
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 3:09 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

Libraries don't have VCRs anymore.


A video that no one can watch might as well not exist.  I would rather have a 
crappy VHS-to-DVD copy than nothing at all.  And I'm willing to pay for it.

Also, it's just a matter of time before VHS is an official obsolete format and 
then, as my mom would say, Katy, bar the door!   It might be to filmakers' 
advantage to get out in front of that eventuality.

Matt

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Matt Ball
] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
To: [ mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu ]videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape


 


Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code 
definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you are 
weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in the 
neck to use   the
law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS copies that are 30 years 
old and just fine and would a lot worse if I transferred them to digital 
format.


 


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E [ mailto:kebr...@albany.edu 
]kebr...@albany.edu wrote:


Dear colleagues: 
The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials 
held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced. 
Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we 
will need to obtain
copyright clearance before we consider reformatting. 
We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have worked 
through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching” 
documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist us.  
Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
Best, 
Karen E.K. Brown
Head, Preservation Department
University at Albany Libraries
1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
Albany, NY 1
Tel. [ tel:%28518%29%20437%203923 ](518) 437 3923
 
 
 
 



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions.
It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video 
librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.


 


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions.
It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video 
librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.






___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
[ mailto:mb...@paceacademy.org ]mb...@paceacademy.org


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions.
It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video 
librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.






___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
[ mailto:mb...@paceacademy.org ]mb...@paceacademy.org


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions.
It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video 
librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.








___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
mb...@paceacademy.org

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Meghann Matwichuk

Matt asked:  How much does it cost to burn a DVD from one's computer?

I'll go ahead and answer that even though it was a rhetorical question.  
Buying a one-off title from a filmmaker / distributor has costs, even if 
the 'sticker price' of the disc is minimal. This often involves 
extensive work on the procurement side of things, especially for larger, 
more bureaucratic institutions (setting up tax ids and other fun I only 
know about peripherally).  But the highest cost to those of us in an 
environment with lots of playback variables is frustration -- a burned 
DVD-R is much, MUCH more likely to cause playback problems than one that 
is pressed.  We have problems with DVD-R technology all the time, and 
especially with those that appear to have been made on a smaller scale 
(not so much the more professionally-made titles from, say, the Warner 
Vault).  Sometimes they skip randomly (maddening), and sometimes we 
can't get them to play back at all (pointless).  We often have to test 
these dvds in multiple players before adding them to the collection, and 
send them back when they don't work consistently (frustrating for all 
involved -- our Library's staff and the seller).  Ones that pass through 
our preview process and are added to the collection are sometimes 
returned with complaints (could not play in the classroom, etc.). We 
adhere bright green stickers to all DVD-Rs in our collection, 
essentially warning instructors to test on playback equipment ahead of 
time.  I felt like these might be important points to make, especially 
since there are distributors on this list.  I agree that dubbed copies 
can have research value, but as a teaching tool I would MUCH rather wait 
for a professionally-made release.  Of course there are many times where 
this just isn't going to happen, but a DVD-R pressed on someone's Dell 
is as likely to cause more problems than it solves.


And, libraries most certainly do have VCRs these days.  Especially as 
players are being removed from classrooms, it's becoming more and more 
important that we do maintain older equipment to meet our patrons' needs.


--
Meghann Matwichuk, M.S.
Associate Librarian
Film and Video Collection Department
Morris Library, University of Delaware
181 S. College Ave.
Newark, DE 19717
(302) 831-1475
http://www.lib.udel.edu/filmandvideo

On 7/24/2014 3:08 PM, Matt Ball wrote:
Libraries don't have VCRs anymore.  A video that no one can watch 
might as well not exist.  I would rather have a crappy VHS-to-DVD copy 
than nothing at all.  And I'm willing to pay for it.


Also, it's just a matter of time before VHS is an official obsolete 
format and then, as my mom would say, Katy, bar the door!   It might 
be to filmakers' advantage to get out in front of that eventuality.


Matt


*videolib@lists.berkeley.edu mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:*
Seriously Matt? Dennis is MUCH better at this. But you have to go back 
to the original material often 35mm fillm elements do a decent new 
transfer, box it, promote it etc. The whole point of digital is to get 
high quality looking material. If one just took some old VHS master 
and dubbed it , it would hideous and strange as it may seem filmmakers 
and distributors really want their stuff to look good. Oh and I 
completely forgot PAYING FOR THE RIGHTS including the possibility of 
re licensing expensive music. Ask Dennis how much has been spent on 
things like KILLER OF SHEEP, Shirley Clark films etc.



I remember a now forgotten doc I really liked that had long fallen out 
of distribution. I asked Kino to check into it, and it was now owned 
by reasonably friendly French rights holder but between licensing and 
production you were probably looking at 20 grand and it was a small 
title but also one that would have been pirated the day it became 
available.



Imagine trying to put small films out in the increasingly decreasing 
DVD market, it almost impossible just to cover costs.



On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Matt Ball mb...@paceacademy.org 
mailto:mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:



Just curious about the enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in 
digital format, how much does it cost to burn a DVD from one's computer?


Matt

___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
mb...@paceacademy.org mailto:mb...@paceacademy.org


*videolib@lists.berkeley.edu* 
mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu*writes:*
the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS 
titles it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the 
enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in digital format. In 
theory libraries say they will be only to glad to upgrade to a legal 
copy if one is released but in reality rights holders can't count on 
that. Ironically I think this is pushing some rights holders to have 
titles only available via stream or download which libraries hate.



 Also the law is VERY clear that if you 

Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Dennis Doros
 looking material. If one just took some old VHS master and dubbed it , it
 would hideous and strange as it may seem filmmakers and distributors really
 want their stuff to look good. Oh and I completely forgot PAYING FOR THE
 RIGHTS including the possibility of re licensing expensive music. Ask
 Dennis how much has been spent on things like KILLER OF SHEEP, Shirley
 Clark films etc.


 I remember a now forgotten doc I really liked that had long fallen out of
 distribution. I asked Kino to check into it, and it was now owned by
 reasonably friendly French rights holder but between licensing and
 production you were probably looking at 20 grand and it was a small title
 but also one that would have been pirated the day it became available.


 Imagine trying to put small films out in the increasingly decreasing DVD
 market, it almost impossible just to cover costs.


 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Matt Ball mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:



 Just curious about the enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in
 digital format, how much does it cost to burn a DVD from one's computer?

 Matt

 ___
 Matt Ball
 Director, Woodruff Library
 Pace Academy
 966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
 Atlanta, GA  30327
 mb...@paceacademy.org


 *videolib@lists.berkeley.edu* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu* writes:*
 the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS
 titles it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the
 enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in digital format. In theory
 libraries say they will be only to glad to upgrade to a legal copy if one
 is released but in reality rights holders can't count on that. Ironically I
 think this is pushing some rights holders to have titles only available via
 stream or download which libraries hate.


  Also the law is VERY clear that if you make copies they may not ever be
 checked  out for home use and there is an intense debate ( focusing on
 the definition of premise) if they may in fact ever leave the library to
 be used in a classroom.






 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:




 Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and
 use that items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that
 most of our patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our
 classrooms. The material, as a result, is not being used. Those that are
 consist of off-beat titles that aren’t the major candidates for publishers
 to migrate forward to a more popular media. These, and the so-called
 “orphan works”, will be our biggest challenge in clearing permissions to
 reformat.

 Best, Karen

 *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
 videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jessica Rosner
 *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
 *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape





 Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code
 definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you
 are weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in
 the neck to use   the law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS
 copies that are 30 years old and just fine and would a lot worse if I
 transferred them to digital format.





 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 wrote:


 Dear colleagues:
 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS
 materials held in our general collection, all of which was commercially
 produced. Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not
 available we will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider
 reformatting.
 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching”
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.
 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
 Best,
 Karen E.K. Brown
 Head, Preservation Department
 University at Albany Libraries
 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
 Albany, NY 1
 Tel. (518) 437 3923







 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.





 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video

Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Susan Albrecht
TWO WEEKS!!  Are you ready, Dennis?  Is Amy ready?  Is your SON ready?

Since Princeton starts pretty late, we’re still over 4 weeks away, even with my 
daughter’s freshman “outdoor adventure” 5-day experience at the start.

I am decidedly not ready.

Susan Albrecht
Library Media Acquisitions Manager
Graduate Fellowship Advisor
Wabash College Lilly Library
765-361-6216
765-361-6295 fax
albre...@wabash.edumailto:albre...@wabash.edu
www.facebook.com/wabashcollegelibrary.filmshttp://www.facebook.com/wabashcollegelibrary.films
http://pinterest.com/wabashcolllib/

***
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. --Neil Peart
***

From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis Doros
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 3:56 PM
To: Video Library questions
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

Just started to pay attention to this discussion and saw my name bandied about. 
I once had another distributor who told me he was very proud to spend $3000 to 
transfer a film to digital. I didn't have the heart to say that I've spent that 
much on one scene. And when I saw his transfer, the entire film had an unseemly 
green tint over the whole film.

To put it in context, I was the kind of person with the bad habit of not 
knowing who the star of the film is but I inevitably would lean over to Amy and 
tell her the year the print was made, what stock was used and at what lab. 
After the third surgery on my ribs, I decided I should stop doing that. :-)

To produce a video master properly takes at least $20,000. To clean it of 
scratches and dust is another $10,000. To bring it out on BluRay and DVD is 
another $15,000. And then there's the bonus features that help educators put 
the film and the creative people into context and provide more and better 
information than most text books. (How many text books have a 90-minute 
conversation with a film's director?) For Project Shirley Clarke, the bonus 
features have actually turned into their own DVD release with enough short 
films, home movies, interviews and outtakes for four discs. So far, that's been 
a $100,000 investment. (Yes, I'm obviously nuts, but we've also started a 
feature doc on her so it's not that stupid...)

But I have to say, that I sometimes take my VHS tapes that I have of lost 
films (those that were never in distribution or were banned) and transferring 
to DVD for my own personal use. I mean, it is more convenient then having a VHS 
player with every TV in the place.

The real issue is not the law as much as quality. My argument is that students 
(and their parents) are paying $60,000 a year tuition (my only child is about 
to go to Case Western in two weeks in fact) and they deserve a first-rate 
education. And that includes media. Unfortunately, the A-V department that was 
once glorified in Lyndon Johnson's New Society is now considered the bastard 
child at most institutions and much of the money for first-rate hasn't 
existed since the Reagan administration.

I would really love the ALA and VLA to have a section devoted to A-V 
preservation (AMIA would provide assistance) at every conference and discuss 
best practices for presentation. (Maureen Tripp and I had a lot of fun a couple 
years ago presenting a session at the National Media Market.)

Maybe a VHS to DVD transfer is best practice, but I think that we could also 
use VidLib more actively for people looking for a filmmaker or distributor who 
might be able to provide an upgrade for a poor VHS copy. As for fighting the 
administrations for better budgets, I think we have all be deadened to the war 
that we lost 30 years ago. I admire greatly the people still fighting for their 
departments and their financial need to provide the services that the students 
deserve.



Best regards,
Dennis Doros
Milestone Film  Video
PO Box 128 / Harrington Park, NJ 07640
Phone: 201-767-3117 / Fax: 201-767-3035 / Email: 
milefi...@gmail.commailto:milefi...@gmail.com

Visit our main website!  www.milestonefilms.comhttp://www.milestonefilms.com/
Visit our new websites!  www.mspresents.comhttp://www.mspresents.com, 
www.portraitofjason.comhttp://www.portraitofjason.com, 
www.shirleyclarkefilms.comhttp://www.shirleyclarkefilms.com/,
To see or download our 2014 Video Catalog, click 
herehttp://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0150/7896/files/2014MilestoneVideoCatalog.pdf?75!

Support Milestone Film on 
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Milestone-Film/22348485426 and 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/#!/MilestoneFilms!

See the website: Association of Moving Image 
Archivistshttp://www.amianet.org/ and like them on 
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Association-of-Moving-Image-Archivists/86854559717
AMIA 2014 Conference, Savannah, Georgia, October 8-11, 
2014http://www.amianet.org/

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014

Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Susan Albrecht
Dagnab it!  Meant that just for Dennis, obviously.  It’s been a long, long, 
long week….

Susan Albrecht
Library Media Acquisitions Manager
Graduate Fellowship Advisor
Wabash College Lilly Library
765-361-6216
765-361-6295 fax
albre...@wabash.edumailto:albre...@wabash.edu
www.facebook.com/wabashcollegelibrary.filmshttp://www.facebook.com/wabashcollegelibrary.films
http://pinterest.com/wabashcolllib/

***
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. --Neil Peart
***

From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis Doros
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 3:56 PM
To: Video Library questions
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

Just started to pay attention to this discussion and saw my name bandied about. 
I once had another distributor who told me he was very proud to spend $3000 to 
transfer a film to digital. I didn't have the heart to say that I've spent that 
much on one scene. And when I saw his transfer, the entire film had an unseemly 
green tint over the whole film.

To put it in context, I was the kind of person with the bad habit of not 
knowing who the star of the film is but I inevitably would lean over to Amy and 
tell her the year the print was made, what stock was used and at what lab. 
After the third surgery on my ribs, I decided I should stop doing that. :-)

To produce a video master properly takes at least $20,000. To clean it of 
scratches and dust is another $10,000. To bring it out on BluRay and DVD is 
another $15,000. And then there's the bonus features that help educators put 
the film and the creative people into context and provide more and better 
information than most text books. (How many text books have a 90-minute 
conversation with a film's director?) For Project Shirley Clarke, the bonus 
features have actually turned into their own DVD release with enough short 
films, home movies, interviews and outtakes for four discs. So far, that's been 
a $100,000 investment. (Yes, I'm obviously nuts, but we've also started a 
feature doc on her so it's not that stupid...)

But I have to say, that I sometimes take my VHS tapes that I have of lost 
films (those that were never in distribution or were banned) and transferring 
to DVD for my own personal use. I mean, it is more convenient then having a VHS 
player with every TV in the place.

The real issue is not the law as much as quality. My argument is that students 
(and their parents) are paying $60,000 a year tuition (my only child is about 
to go to Case Western in two weeks in fact) and they deserve a first-rate 
education. And that includes media. Unfortunately, the A-V department that was 
once glorified in Lyndon Johnson's New Society is now considered the bastard 
child at most institutions and much of the money for first-rate hasn't 
existed since the Reagan administration.

I would really love the ALA and VLA to have a section devoted to A-V 
preservation (AMIA would provide assistance) at every conference and discuss 
best practices for presentation. (Maureen Tripp and I had a lot of fun a couple 
years ago presenting a session at the National Media Market.)

Maybe a VHS to DVD transfer is best practice, but I think that we could also 
use VidLib more actively for people looking for a filmmaker or distributor who 
might be able to provide an upgrade for a poor VHS copy. As for fighting the 
administrations for better budgets, I think we have all be deadened to the war 
that we lost 30 years ago. I admire greatly the people still fighting for their 
departments and their financial need to provide the services that the students 
deserve.



Best regards,
Dennis Doros
Milestone Film  Video
PO Box 128 / Harrington Park, NJ 07640
Phone: 201-767-3117 / Fax: 201-767-3035 / Email: 
milefi...@gmail.commailto:milefi...@gmail.com

Visit our main website!  www.milestonefilms.comhttp://www.milestonefilms.com/
Visit our new websites!  www.mspresents.comhttp://www.mspresents.com, 
www.portraitofjason.comhttp://www.portraitofjason.com, 
www.shirleyclarkefilms.comhttp://www.shirleyclarkefilms.com/,
To see or download our 2014 Video Catalog, click 
herehttp://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0150/7896/files/2014MilestoneVideoCatalog.pdf?75!

Support Milestone Film on 
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Milestone-Film/22348485426 and 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/#!/MilestoneFilms!

See the website: Association of Moving Image 
Archivistshttp://www.amianet.org/ and like them on 
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Association-of-Moving-Image-Archivists/86854559717
AMIA 2014 Conference, Savannah, Georgia, October 8-11, 
2014http://www.amianet.org/

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Jessica Rosner 
maddux2...@gmail.commailto:maddux2...@gmail.com wrote:
If it is an educational doc with little interest in visuals you might get some

Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Matt Ball
, bar the door!   It might be to filmakers' 
advantage to get out in front of that eventuality. 

Matt


[ mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu ]videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:
Seriously Matt? Dennis is MUCH better at this. But you have to go back to the 
original material often 35mm fillm elements do a decent new transfer, box it, 
promote it etc. The whole point of digital is to get high quality looking 
material. If one
just took some old VHS master and dubbed it , it would hideous and strange as 
it may seem filmmakers and distributors really want their stuff to look good. 
Oh and I completely forgot PAYING FOR THE RIGHTS including the possibility of 
re licensing
expensive music. Ask Dennis how much has been spent on things like KILLER OF 
SHEEP, Shirley Clark films etc.


I remember a now forgotten doc I really liked that had long fallen out of 
distribution. I asked Kino to check into it, and it was now owned by 
reasonably friendly French rights holder but between licensing and production 
you were probably looking
at 20 grand and it was a small title but also one that would have been pirated 
the day it became available. 


Imagine trying to put small films out in the increasingly decreasing DVD 
market, it almost impossible just to cover costs.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Matt Ball [ mailto:mb...@paceacademy.org 
]mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:


  
Just curious about the enormous cost of putting smaller titles out in digital 
format, how much does it cost to burn a DVD from one's computer?

Matt

___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
[ mailto:mb...@paceacademy.org ]mb...@paceacademy.org


[ mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu ]videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:
the catch 22 is that when institutions make copies of out of print VHS titles 
it makes it that much harder for rights holder to justify the enormous cost of 
putting smaller titles out in digital format. In theory libraries say they 
will be only to
glad to upgrade to a legal copy if one is released but in reality rights 
holders can't count on that. Ironically I think this is pushing some rights 
holders to have titles only available via stream or download which libraries 
hate.


 Also the law is VERY clear that if you make copies they may not ever be 
checked  out for home use and there is an intense debate ( focusing on the 
definition of premise) if they may in fact ever leave the library to be used 
in a classroom.






On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Brown, Karen E [ mailto:kebr...@albany.edu 
]kebr...@albany.edu wrote:




Thank you, Jessica. I suppose we can also make a case based on age and use 
that items in our collection are deteriorating. Our problem is that most of 
our patrons don’t have a VHS player at home; there are none in our classrooms. 
The material, as
a result, is not being used. Those that are consist of off-beat titles that 
aren’t the major candidates for publishers to migrate forward to a more 
popular media. These, and the so-called “orphan works”, will be our biggest 
challenge in
clearing permissions to reformat.
 
Best, Karen
 
From: [ mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
]videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:[ 
mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
]videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:31 PM
To: [ mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu ]videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape


 


Well at the risk of being jumped on VHS does not fit the copyright code 
definition of an obsolete format so unless you document that every VHS you are 
weeding is literally in the process of deteriorating not just a pain in the 
neck to use   the
law does not let you make digital copies. I have VHS copies that are 30 years 
old and just fine and would a lot worse if I transferred them to digital 
format.


 


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Brown, Karen E [ mailto:kebr...@albany.edu 
]kebr...@albany.edu wrote:


Dear colleagues: 
The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials 
held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced. 
Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we 
will need to obtain
copyright clearance before we consider reformatting. 
We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have worked 
through a project such as this that have “video copyright searching” 
documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist us.  
Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
Best, 
Karen E.K. Brown
Head, Preservation Department
University at Albany Libraries
1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
Albany, NY 1
Tel. [ tel:%28518%29%20437%203923 ](518) 437 3923
 
 
 
 



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition

Re: [Videolib] copyright searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Dennis Doros
Dear Maureen,

We has nearly 1000 members across the country and around the world. I
believe that our board member Elena Rossi-Snook is having a panel at ALA
but I'm not entirely sure. But if the VideoRound Table would like to
propose a topic for 2015 and I can find three or four amazing archivists in
just about every city you can imagine. I believe it's San Francisco? There
might even be a way to work this in with the Pacific Film Archive, the
Prelinger Library and/or Oddball Films. All amazing organizations.


Best regards,
Dennis Doros
Milestone Film  Video
PO Box 128 / Harrington Park, NJ 07640
Phone: 201-767-3117 / Fax: 201-767-3035 / Email: milefi...@gmail.com

Visit our main website!  www.milestonefilms.com
Visit our new websites!  www.mspresents.com, www.portraitofjason.com,
www.shirleyclarkefilms.com,
To see or download our 2014 Video Catalog, click here
http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0150/7896/files/2014MilestoneVideoCatalog.pdf?75
!


Support Milestone Film on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Milestone-Film/22348485426 and Twitter
https://twitter.com/#!/MilestoneFilms!


See the website: Association of Moving Image Archivists
http://www.amianet.org/ and like them on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Association-of-Moving-Image-Archivists/86854559717
AMIA 2014 Conference, Savannah, Georgia, October 8-11, 2014
http://www.amianet.org/


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Maureen Tripp maureen_tr...@emerson.edu
wrote:

 Dennis Doros, I second that emotion!
 totally agree that A-V preservation should be part of ALA annual
 programming--and it would be wonderful if AMIA could help out with
 expertise.
 The VideoRoundtable is looking for program proposals for 2015 right now.
  I hope someone will rise to the challenge!
 MT

 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright Searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Deg Farrelly
I am late to this now lengthy conversation, in which many others have already 
participated.  But permit me to make several statements of fact, not opinion, 
related to the issue at hand.

First and foremost, in response to Karen's original question and subject line.  
 Contrary to what others on this list may claim, by US Copyright Law, Section 
108, a copyright search is NOT required in order duplicate a title in a 
library's video collection.  What * is * required is a * reasonable search * 
for a * new * copy at a * reasonable * price.
(in other words, due diligence).

A VHS tape, for which a NEW VHS copy is available, does not meet the 
requirements of the law.
 
Other conditions must be met.  The original item in the library must be a 
legally acquired copy, it must meet one of these conditions:  lost, damaged, 
stolen, deteriorating, or in an obsolete format.
 
Read the law here:  http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#108

The law does not define the term reasonable.  The law does define obsolete:

For purposes of this subsection, a format shall be considered obsolete if the 
machine or device necessary to render perceptible a work stored in that format 
is no longer 
manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the commercial 
marketplace.

By the terms of the law, VHS is therefore, not an obsolete format.  

It can be argued, however, based on the detailed research conducted my Walter 
Forsberg for the Video at Risk Project (and reported at a National Media 
Market session November 4, 2013) that VHS is a * deteriorating * format.  (I 
understand that a peer reviewed article on Walter's research is forthcoming 
later this year.)  

Also note that the law permits making three (3) copies of the item being 
duplicated.  

And while some argue that a copy made within the terms of Section 108 may not 
leave the library, the law also includes a clause that states that NOTHING in 
the law trumps rights under Section 107 (commonly called Fair Use). 

(f) Nothing in this section--... (4) in any way affects the right of fair use 
as provided by section 107... 

 Thus a library can argue that it is fair use for a copy made within Section 
108 provisions, of a video legally acquired for use in classrooms or general 
circulation outside the library, to continued to be used in this manner. 

I am not going to engage in a back and forth p%ssing match with others on 
this list on these points...  

-deg

deg farrelly
ShareStream Administrator/Media Librarian
Arizona State University Libraries
Tempe, AZ  85287-1006
602.332.3103




--

Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:37:28 +
From: Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
Subject: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

Dear colleagues:
The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials held 
in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced. Regarding 
those titles for which a more current format is not available we will need to 
obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.
We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have worked 
through a project such as this that have video copyright searching 
documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist us.
Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
Best,
Karen E.K. Brown
Head, Preservation Department
University at Albany Libraries
1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
Albany, NY 1
Tel. (518) 437 3923

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Copyright Searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Jessica Rosner
I don't have time to argue this in detail either (on my way to Cooperstown)
but is particularly absurd to claim you can duplicate an allegedly
deteriorating   work and circulate it i off campus when the law very
clearly states it is NOT to  go off premise. What does fair use  have to
do with the CIRCULATION of a copy? Fair Use regards how much of a
copyrighted work can be copied or used for a new purpose, it has no
relation at all to circulated a copy which 108 expressly forbids.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Deg Farrelly deg.farre...@asu.edu wrote:

 I am late to this now lengthy conversation, in which many others have
 already participated.  But permit me to make several statements of fact,
 not opinion, related to the issue at hand.

 First and foremost, in response to Karen's original question and subject
 line.   Contrary to what others on this list may claim, by US Copyright
 Law, Section 108, a copyright search is NOT required in order duplicate a
 title in a library's video collection.  What * is * required is a *
 reasonable search * for a * new * copy at a * reasonable * price.
 (in other words, due diligence).

 A VHS tape, for which a NEW VHS copy is available, does not meet the
 requirements of the law.

 Other conditions must be met.  The original item in the library must be a
 legally acquired copy, it must meet one of these conditions:  lost,
 damaged, stolen, deteriorating, or in an obsolete format.

 Read the law here:  http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#108

 The law does not define the term reasonable.  The law does define
 obsolete:

 For purposes of this subsection, a format shall be considered obsolete if
 the machine or device necessary to render perceptible a work stored in that
 format is no longer
 manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the commercial
 marketplace.

 By the terms of the law, VHS is therefore, not an obsolete format.

 It can be argued, however, based on the detailed research conducted my
 Walter Forsberg for the Video at Risk Project (and reported at a National
 Media Market session November 4, 2013) that VHS is a * deteriorating *
 format.  (I understand that a peer reviewed article on Walter's research is
 forthcoming later this year.)

 Also note that the law permits making three (3) copies of the item being
 duplicated.

 And while some argue that a copy made within the terms of Section 108 may
 not leave the library, the law also includes a clause that states that
 NOTHING in the law trumps rights under Section 107 (commonly called Fair
 Use).

 (f) Nothing in this section--... (4) in any way affects the right of fair
 use as provided by section 107...

  Thus a library can argue that it is fair use for a copy made within
 Section 108 provisions, of a video legally acquired for use in classrooms
 or general circulation outside the library, to continued to be used in this
 manner.

 I am not going to engage in a back and forth p%ssing match with others
 on this list on these points...

 -deg

 deg farrelly
 ShareStream Administrator/Media Librarian
 Arizona State University Libraries
 Tempe, AZ  85287-1006
 602.332.3103




 --

 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:37:28 +
 From: Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 Subject: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

 Dear colleagues:
 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials
 held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced.
 Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we
 will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.
 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have video copyright searching
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.
 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
 Best,
 Karen E.K. Brown
 Head, Preservation Department
 University at Albany Libraries
 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
 Albany, NY 1
 Tel. (518) 437 3923

 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as
 an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational 

Re: [Videolib] Copyright Searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Matt Ball
Thanks Deg.  

Also, I confess to speaking hyperbolically (is that a word?) when I said that 
libraries don’t have VCRs anymore.  As I mentioned to Jeff off-line (as I was 
making sure he hadn’t choked on his water) I should've said Increasingly, 
libraries have
no way to provide access to VHS tapes.  Which means that if something is only 
available on VHS then it might as well not be available at all.  And if my job 
is to connect people with content, then I'd rather have something, even if it's 
not
perfect, than nothing at all.

Also, the end is nigh (for VCRs).  (Picture me as the crazy guy holding a 
cardboard sign in the town square.)

Matt


videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:
I am late to this now lengthy conversation, in which many others have already 
participated.  But permit me to make several statements of fact, not opinion, 
related to the issue at hand.

First and foremost, in response to Karen's original question and subject line. 
  Contrary to what others on this list may claim, by US Copyright Law, Section 
108, a copyright search is NOT required in order duplicate a title in a 
library's video
collection.  What * is * required is a * reasonable search * for a * new * 
copy at a * reasonable * price.
(in other words, due diligence).

A VHS tape, for which a NEW VHS copy is available, does not meet the 
requirements of the law.
 
Other conditions must be met.  The original item in the library must be a 
legally acquired copy, it must meet one of these conditions:  lost, damaged, 
stolen, deteriorating, or in an obsolete format.
 
Read the law here:  http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#108

The law does not define the term reasonable.  The law does define obsolete:

For purposes of this subsection, a format shall be considered obsolete if the 
machine or device necessary to render perceptible a work stored in that format 
is no longer 
manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the commercial 
marketplace.

By the terms of the law, VHS is therefore, not an obsolete format.  

It can be argued, however, based on the detailed research conducted my Walter 
Forsberg for the Video at Risk Project (and reported at a National Media 
Market session November 4, 2013) that VHS is a * deteriorating * format.  (I 
understand that a
peer reviewed article on Walter's research is forthcoming later this year.)  

Also note that the law permits making three (3) copies of the item being 
duplicated.  

And while some argue that a copy made within the terms of Section 108 may not 
leave the library, the law also includes a clause that states that NOTHING in 
the law trumps rights under Section 107 (commonly called Fair Use). 

(f) Nothing in this section--... (4) in any way affects the right of fair use 
as provided by section 107... 

 Thus a library can argue that it is fair use for a copy made within Section 
 108 provisions, of a video legally acquired for use in classrooms or general 
 circulation outside the library, to continued to be used in this manner. 

I am not going to engage in a back and forth p%ssing match with others on 
this list on these points...  

-deg

deg farrelly
ShareStream Administrator/Media Librarian
Arizona State University Libraries
Tempe, AZ  85287-1006
602.332.3103




--

Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:37:28 +
From: Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
Subject: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

Dear colleagues:
The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials 
held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced. 
Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we 
will need to obtain
copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.
We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have worked 
through a project such as this that have video copyright searching 
documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist us.
Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
Best,
Karen E.K. Brown
Head, Preservation Department
University at Albany Libraries
1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
Albany, NY 1
Tel. (518) 437 3923

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions.
It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video 
librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.



___
Matt Ball
Director, Woodruff Library
Pace Academy
966 W. Paces Ferry Rd.
Atlanta, GA  30327
mb...@paceacademy.org

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and 

Re: [Videolib] Copyright Searches for videotape

2014-07-24 Thread Eric Wheeler
We are engaged in a weeding/removal project at my institution as well. We
are purchasing DVD replacement copies of VHS tapes where possible and
removing VCRs from classrooms and from the library's equipment collection.
Our goal is to remove all VHS/VCR resources from campus by January 2015. At
some point, one has to let go of older media formats, particularly when
one's support capabilities are limited. It's sad that some content will be
orphaned in the process.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Matt Ball mb...@paceacademy.org wrote:

   Thanks Deg.

 Also, I confess to speaking hyperbolically (is that a word?) when I said
 that libraries don’t have VCRs anymore.  As I mentioned to Jeff off-line
 (as I was making sure he hadn’t choked on his water) I should've said
 Increasingly, libraries have no way to provide access to VHS tapes.
  Which means that if something is only available on VHS then it might as
 well not be available at all.  And if my job is to connect people with
 content, then I'd rather have something, even if it's not perfect, than
 nothing at all.

 Also, the end is nigh (for VCRs).  (Picture me as the crazy guy holding a
 cardboard sign in the town square.)

 Matt


 *videolib@lists.berkeley.edu videolib@lists.berkeley.edu writes:*
 I am late to this now lengthy conversation, in which many others have
 already participated.  But permit me to make several statements of fact,
 not opinion, related to the issue at hand.

 First and foremost, in response to Karen's original question and subject
 line.   Contrary to what others on this list may claim, by US Copyright
 Law, Section 108, a copyright search is NOT required in order duplicate a
 title in a library's video collection.  What * is * required is a *
 reasonable search * for a * new * copy at a * reasonable * price.
 (in other words, due diligence).

 A VHS tape, for which a NEW VHS copy is available, does not meet the
 requirements of the law.
  Other conditions must be met.  The original item in the library must be
 a legally acquired copy, it must meet one of these conditions:  lost,
 damaged, stolen, deteriorating, or in an obsolete format.
  Read the law here:  http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#108

 The law does not define the term reasonable.  The law does define
 obsolete:

 For purposes of this subsection, a format shall be considered obsolete if
 the machine or device necessary to render perceptible a work stored in that
 format is no longer
 manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the commercial
 marketplace.

 By the terms of the law, VHS is therefore, not an obsolete format.

 It can be argued, however, based on the detailed research conducted my
 Walter Forsberg for the Video at Risk Project (and reported at a National
 Media Market session November 4, 2013) that VHS is a * deteriorating *
 format.  (I understand that a peer reviewed article on Walter's research is
 forthcoming later this year.)

 Also note that the law permits making three (3) copies of the item being
 duplicated.

 And while some argue that a copy made within the terms of Section 108 may
 not leave the library, the law also includes a clause that states that
 NOTHING in the law trumps rights under Section 107 (commonly called Fair
 Use).

 (f) Nothing in this section--... (4) in any way affects the right of fair
 use as provided by section 107...

  Thus a library can argue that it is fair use for a copy made within
 Section 108 provisions, of a video legally acquired for use in classrooms
 or general circulation outside the library, to continued to be used in this
 manner.

 I am not going to engage in a back and forth p%ssing match with others
 on this list on these points...

 -deg

 deg farrelly
 ShareStream Administrator/Media Librarian
 Arizona State University Libraries
 Tempe, AZ  85287-1006
 602.332.3103




 --

 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:37:28 +
 From: Brown, Karen E kebr...@albany.edu
 Subject: [Videolib] Copyright searches for videotape

 Dear colleagues:
 The University at Albany, SUNY, is in the process of weeding VHS materials
 held in our general collection, all of which was commercially produced.
 Regarding those titles for which a more current format is not available we
 will need to obtain copyright clearance before we consider reformatting.
 We are wondering if there are other educational institutions that have
 worked through a project such as this that have video copyright searching
 documentation tools or data that they would be willing to share to assist
 us.
 Thank you in advance for your input and advice.
 Best,
 Karen E.K. Brown
 Head, Preservation Department
 University at Albany Libraries
 1400 Washington Ave, Room SL 310
 Albany, NY 1
 Tel. (518) 437 3923

 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation,