Re: [Vo]:Nanoplasmonic EMF enhancement
And what is this anapole has to do with reaching the strong enhancement? I don't see any relation. The fractal relation for amplification will just work effectively for a small period of time. Any more and all will get are weak arcing going from tree to sub-tree, randomly. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
[Vo]:What the Ni/H NAE site looks like
What the NAE looks like in the Ni/H reactor is an aggregation of widely variable sized atomic clusters on or near the tips of the nanowires projecting from the nickel micro particles. Particle aggregation is a widespread phenomenon in nature, which spontaneously occurs in the natural setting but is also widely exploited in manufacturing. Over time, the small aggregations that initially form on the nanowires become larger. The growth occurs mainly through encounters between different clusters, and therefore one refers to a cluster-cluster aggregation process. The resulting clusters are irregular, but statistically self-similar. They are examples of mass fractals, whereby their mass M grows with their typical size characterized by the radius of gyration Rg as a power-law M is proportional to R(d,g) where d is the mass fractal dimension. Depending whether the aggregation is fast or slow, one refers to diffusion limited cluster aggregation (DLCA) or reaction limited cluster aggregation (RLCA). The clusters have different characteristics in each regime. DLCA clusters are loose and ramified (d ≈ 1.8), while the RLCA clusters are more compact (d ≈ 2.3). The cluster size distribution is also different in these two regimes. DLCA clusters are relatively monodisperse, while the size distribution of RLCA clusters is very broad. The Ni/H reactor most likely produces primarily RLCA cluster aggregates. The larger the cluster size, the faster their formation velocity. At higher particle concentrations, the growing clusters may interlink between nanowires, and form a particle cross-linked system, which exhibits no flow when in the steady-state. A particle arrogate may contain many NAE sites based on the population number of very small atomic clusters in the aggregate. The nuclear active anapole magnetic fields project from this location between these small particle aggregate members. Since the anapole magnetic fields will emanate near the smallest particle aggregate members, these fields will mostly effect the material that comprises the aggregates and but when the NAE just so happens to be positioned near the nanowire sometimes the nickel of the nanowires will also be disrupted.
Re: [Vo]:Nanoplasmonic EMF enhancement
"Dark mode" means no EMF leakage. It means an EMF black hole where light cannot escape o matter how strong the EMF gets. What comes out of the vortex current in the hotspot in this EMF black hole is a anapole magnetic field. This is the same thing that happens in black holes in quasars. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > I don't get what you are saying. Surely I am not talking about far field. > I am talking only about the near field, the electrostatic field. If you are > amplifying that, by using a series of electric components, you will provoke > arcing in some sub element of this set, way before you get all that > amplification. You had to amplify all that for a short period of time, > otherwise, you will have a weak arcing. > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
Re: [Vo]:Nanoplasmonic EMF enhancement
BTW, I get that you want to focus energy, while the paper you pointed out to me do something different, it amplifies a signal. So, it doesn't have problems with arcing. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Nanoplasmonic EMF enhancement
I don't get what you are saying. Surely I am not talking about far field. I am talking only about the near field, the electrostatic field. If you are amplifying that, by using a series of electric components, you will provoke arcing in some sub element of this set, way before you get all that amplification. You had to amplify all that for a short period of time, otherwise, you will have a weak arcing. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Nanoplasmonic EMF enhancement
EMF escape to the far field (lightning) is countered by "the evanescent wave". There is an EMF power amplification factor of up to 10 to the 15 power experimentally demonstrated by nanolenzes formed by nanowires and nanoparticles. This is before the chemical probes that measure this power level are destroyed by the EMF originating from the “hot spot". An evanescent wave exits in the near-field of a reflecting surface of the nano-particle chain with an intensity that exhibits exponential decay with distance from the boundary at which the wave was formed. Evanescent waves are a general property of wave-equations, and can in principle occur in any context to which a wave-equation applies. They are formed at the boundary between two media with different wave motion properties, and are most intense within one third of a wavelength from the surface of formation. This is the reason why electric arcing and dielectric boundaries are important in LENR. EMF amplification involves solutions of Maxwell’s equations and boundary conditions where imaginary solutions are manifest. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evanescent_wave The total and perfect internal reflection of EMF is a feature of sub-wavelength optics which perfectly store EMF energy in a dark mode within intense vortex currents. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > Beware with the breakdown current. At some point, there will be a > lightning putting the metal structures under equilibrium again. You have to > somehow insulate the elements until a given moment when you, then, will > remove the insulation. Or you can put them separated and then slowly move > them together, although I'd consider this a rather unstable proces. > > > 2013/8/21 Axil Axil > >> The Ni/H reactor design allows for a huge amplification factor produced >> by many nanoparticles in chains. >> >> >> >> >> >> An important problem in ’plasmonics’ is the question of how micro/nano >> particles should be designed and arranged with respect to each other to >> produce the strongest possible field enhancement. >> >> >> >> One possible solution to this problem is the configuration of a >> self-similar chain of particles with decreasing diameters >> >> >> >> [K. Li, M. I. Stockman, and D. J. Bergman.Self-similar chain of metal >> nanospheres as an efficient nanolens.Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 227402 (2003). >> >> >> >> >> http://www.phy-astr.gsu.edu/stockman/data/PRL_91_27402_2003_Stockman_Nanolens.pdf] >> >> >> >> >> Self-similarity requires that radii Ri and the distances di,i+1 of the >> spheres i and i+1 are connected by the simple relations Ri+1 = ·Ri and >> di+1,i+2 = ·kdi,i+1 where · k<< 1. The last condition ensures that the >> field of a given nanoparticle is only a weak perturbation of the previous, >> bigger particle. The self-similarity is not a necessary condition but it >> allows for an elegant notation. All particles are considered in the >> electrostatic limit. >> >> >> >> Now, if each of the particles enhances its driving field by a certain >> factor (a), then the cumulative effect of the chain of particles is a field >> enhancement on the order of (a)n where n is the number of particles. In >> other words, the enhanced field of the largest particle acts as an >> excitation field for the next smaller particle. The resulting enhanced >> field of this second particle then acts as the excitation field for the >> next smaller particle, and so on. For the system depicted in Fig. 12.23 of >> >> >> >> Chapter 12 >> >> Surface plasmons >> >> >> >> >> http://www.optics.rochester.edu/workgroups/novotny/courses/OPT463/plasmonss.pdf >> >> >> >> >> >> assuming a moderate a » 10, leads to a total field enhancement of »1000 >> (every factor of 10 particles produces an enhancement of 1000 or 10 to the >> power of 3). As we will see in the following section, field enhancements of >> at least 1000 are necessary to observe the Raman scattering of single >> molecules adsorbed onto rough metal structures. >> >> >> >> Assume the largest particle is 7*10^^-6 (7 microns) and the smallest is a >> nanometer or 10^^-9 , then the size difference is 1.4 * 10^^4 >> >> >> >> There is a particle size amplification of about 1. If there are >> 10,000 nanoparticles in the chain, there will be 1000 to the power of 3 >> particle enhancement factor or 1,000,000,000. >> >> >> >> That is a total enhancement factor of 10,000,000,000,000. Add the >> million volt nanowire enhancement in with the particle number/size >> enhancement and you get a big number. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
RE: [Vo]:More problems in Japan
From: Eric Walker Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: If the local wildlife has ingested 600 times the amount of radioactivity to be eaten by humans, I find myself asking myself: how the hell can they continue to survive and presumably reproduce? One thought I have here is that 600 times permissible levels for humans might not be all that much. Sometimes regulators can be a little squeamish. I suspect this is as much for political reasons as health reasons -- it looks bad to say "a little radiation never harmed anyone." In fact it could help a few poor souls… The EPA recommends corrective action for any house with an indoor concentration level higher than 148 Bq/m3. Guess what: nearly one in 15 homes in the U.S. has such a level of indoor radon … and often much more. However there is conflicting evidence on whether this level is more harmful to a smoker, for instance or less. (It is more harmful to a juvenile nonsmoker for sure). “Radium caves” were considered healthful in the USA not too long ago - and they were considered especially helpful for people with chronic respiratory problems. The raises the perplexing question of whether someone who has already developed lung cancer from smoking could actually have their life extended by breathing radium/radon at selected times … the idea being the “enemy of my enemy is my friend” … at least as long as the concentration was “not to hot and not too cold,” which is to say the Goldilocks’ cure…
Re: [Vo]:Nanoplasmonic EMF enhancement
Beware with the breakdown current. At some point, there will be a lightning putting the metal structures under equilibrium again. You have to somehow insulate the elements until a given moment when you, then, will remove the insulation. Or you can put them separated and then slowly move them together, although I'd consider this a rather unstable proces. 2013/8/21 Axil Axil > The Ni/H reactor design allows for a huge amplification factor produced by > many nanoparticles in chains. > > > > > > An important problem in ’plasmonics’ is the question of how micro/nano > particles should be designed and arranged with respect to each other to > produce the strongest possible field enhancement. > > > > One possible solution to this problem is the configuration of a > self-similar chain of particles with decreasing diameters > > > > [K. Li, M. I. Stockman, and D. J. Bergman.Self-similar chain of metal > nanospheres as an efficient nanolens.Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 227402 (2003). > > > > > http://www.phy-astr.gsu.edu/stockman/data/PRL_91_27402_2003_Stockman_Nanolens.pdf] > > > > > Self-similarity requires that radii Ri and the distances di,i+1 of the > spheres i and i+1 are connected by the simple relations Ri+1 = ·Ri and > di+1,i+2 = ·kdi,i+1 where · k<< 1. The last condition ensures that the > field of a given nanoparticle is only a weak perturbation of the previous, > bigger particle. The self-similarity is not a necessary condition but it > allows for an elegant notation. All particles are considered in the > electrostatic limit. > > > > Now, if each of the particles enhances its driving field by a certain > factor (a), then the cumulative effect of the chain of particles is a field > enhancement on the order of (a)n where n is the number of particles. In > other words, the enhanced field of the largest particle acts as an > excitation field for the next smaller particle. The resulting enhanced > field of this second particle then acts as the excitation field for the > next smaller particle, and so on. For the system depicted in Fig. 12.23 of > > > > Chapter 12 > > Surface plasmons > > > > > http://www.optics.rochester.edu/workgroups/novotny/courses/OPT463/plasmonss.pdf > > > > > > assuming a moderate a » 10, leads to a total field enhancement of »1000 > (every factor of 10 particles produces an enhancement of 1000 or 10 to the > power of 3). As we will see in the following section, field enhancements of > at least 1000 are necessary to observe the Raman scattering of single > molecules adsorbed onto rough metal structures. > > > > Assume the largest particle is 7*10^^-6 (7 microns) and the smallest is a > nanometer or 10^^-9 , then the size difference is 1.4 * 10^^4 > > > > There is a particle size amplification of about 1. If there are > 10,000 nanoparticles in the chain, there will be 1000 to the power of 3 > particle enhancement factor or 1,000,000,000. > > > > That is a total enhancement factor of 10,000,000,000,000. Add the > million volt nanowire enhancement in with the particle number/size > enhancement and you get a big number. > > > > > > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:More problems in Japan
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: > If the local wildlife has ingested 600 times the amount of radioactivity > to be eaten by humans, I find myself asking myself: how the hell can they > continue to survive and presumably reproduce? > They are reproducing like the dickens. Hideo Ikegami and Mike Melich both told me that the radiation safety standards are based on wild guesses. They more or less pulled the numbers out of a hat. There were some studies based on the mortality rates from the Hiroshima bomb, but that hardly seems like a good model to me. A lot else was going on with those people, such as burns, starvation and disease. I think there were animal studies, but I have heard the results were all over the map. Ikegami said that one point they tested tritium in fish (T2O). They put in supposedly fatal doses. The fish were unfazed. Having said all that, I sure wouldn't eat those boars, or the plants they are eating. I wouldn't want to live there. Nobody lives there. That's why the boar, monkey and mice populations are exploding. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:More problems in Japan
The $50B estimate will become $100B before we get to the half life of some of that stuff. So far their only solution since day one is "Just add Water" On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:10 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net> wrote: > From: Jed > > ** ** > > ... > > ** ** > > > The Fukushima reactor disaster is going to on for years and years. > > > Probably decades. I doubt that people will go back to living in places** > ** > > > where the wild boars are 600 times too radioactive to eat. > > ** ** > > If the local wildlife has ingested 600 times the amount of radioactivity > to be eaten by humans, I find myself asking myself: how the hell can they > continue to survive and presumably reproduce? > > ** ** > > Are we watching nature & evolution performing an unprecedented kind of > natural selection here, where what wildlife that manages to survive and > subsequently reproduce is due to the fact that their genes are better > equipped at withstanding obscene amounts of radiation? I'm really not > trying to be flippant here. It would appear to me that something similar > happened at Chernobyl. Surveys noted flourishing herds of dear and/or elk > and wolf packs pursuing them in the heavily irradiated lands surrounding > Chernobyl. > > ** ** > > I'm going to take a stab here and speculate that Evolution may have worked > out a shrewd way of propagating many kinds of complex species that took Her > millions of years to craft, even when Her evolutionary designs are forced > to survive in dire inhospitable environments. Evolution, by ensuring that > they live long enough into adulthood to reproduce enough offspring before > succumbing to all sorts of radiation induced afflictions is probably the > key to continued success. With each successive generation, they may get a > little better at withstanding the harsh conditions they are subjected to. I > suspect a side-benefit of excess radiation may be an increased rate of > evolution happening due to increased mutations. With increased mutations, > it seems to me that there may also be the possibility of increasing the > number of positive mutations, however small that percentage is likely to > be. If they are good mutations, they will reproduce themselves and pass it > on. > > ** ** > > I wonder what the trade-offs are living in this kind of an increased > evolutionary environment. Boars that eventually reach the size of minivans? > I hope they don’t take a hankering to the flavor of “long-pig”. > > ** ** > > > When it works, nuclear power is cheaper than coal, oil, wind or any other > > > > source of electricity. Now we have seen that when it fails, the cost can > > > > be catastrophic. The critics predicted that. I did not think so, but I > now > > > see the critics were right. I am pretty sure this one accident wiped out > > > > all the savings that nuclear power every made in Japan. Probably it cost > > > > more than all the savings in the world, not just Japan. > > ** ** > > God! What a mess. > > ** ** > > Regards, > > Steven Vincent Johnson > > svjart.OrionWorks.com > > www.zazzle.com/orionworks > > tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/ >
Re: [Vo]:More problems in Japan
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:10 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net> wrote: > If the local wildlife has ingested 600 times the amount of radioactivity > to be eaten by humans, I find myself asking myself: how the hell can they > continue to survive and presumably reproduce? > One thought I have here is that 600 times permissible levels for humans might not be all that much. Sometimes regulators can be a little squeamish. I suspect this is as much for political reasons as health reasons -- it looks bad to say "a little radiation never harmed anyone." Eric
RE: [Vo]:More problems in Japan
From: Jed ... > The Fukushima reactor disaster is going to on for years and years. > Probably decades. I doubt that people will go back to living in places > where the wild boars are 600 times too radioactive to eat. If the local wildlife has ingested 600 times the amount of radioactivity to be eaten by humans, I find myself asking myself: how the hell can they continue to survive and presumably reproduce? Are we watching nature & evolution performing an unprecedented kind of natural selection here, where what wildlife that manages to survive and subsequently reproduce is due to the fact that their genes are better equipped at withstanding obscene amounts of radiation? I'm really not trying to be flippant here. It would appear to me that something similar happened at Chernobyl. Surveys noted flourishing herds of dear and/or elk and wolf packs pursuing them in the heavily irradiated lands surrounding Chernobyl. I'm going to take a stab here and speculate that Evolution may have worked out a shrewd way of propagating many kinds of complex species that took Her millions of years to craft, even when Her evolutionary designs are forced to survive in dire inhospitable environments. Evolution, by ensuring that they live long enough into adulthood to reproduce enough offspring before succumbing to all sorts of radiation induced afflictions is probably the key to continued success. With each successive generation, they may get a little better at withstanding the harsh conditions they are subjected to. I suspect a side-benefit of excess radiation may be an increased rate of evolution happening due to increased mutations. With increased mutations, it seems to me that there may also be the possibility of increasing the number of positive mutations, however small that percentage is likely to be. If they are good mutations, they will reproduce themselves and pass it on. I wonder what the trade-offs are living in this kind of an increased evolutionary environment. Boars that eventually reach the size of minivans? I hope they don't take a hankering to the flavor of "long-pig". > When it works, nuclear power is cheaper than coal, oil, wind or any other > source of electricity. Now we have seen that when it fails, the cost can > be catastrophic. The critics predicted that. I did not think so, but I now > see the critics were right. I am pretty sure this one accident wiped out > all the savings that nuclear power every made in Japan. Probably it cost > more than all the savings in the world, not just Japan. God! What a mess. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/
Re: [Vo]:More problems in Japan
Some other details from NHK: There are 350 tanks. They are temporary structures designed to last 5 years. There are no water level gauges in the tanks so no one knew the water level was falling. They are now going to dispatch people to "patrol" the tanks looking for leaks. They asked an expert, "if one tank is leaking, isn't it likely the seals are corroded and the others may soon leak?" He said: "Yes, exactly. That is what worries me." Oy veh! - Jed
Re: [Vo]:More problems in Japan
Bad enough to be lead story on the 7 o'clock news, and to make Cabinet Minister hopping mad. High government officials in Japan seldom get hopping mad at major corporations in public. They are like U.S. Republicans. They are best friends with big corporations and big money. The Fukushima reactor disaster is going to on for years and years. Probably decades. I doubt that people will go back to living in places where the wild boars are 600 times too radioactive to eat. When it works, nuclear power is cheaper than coal, oil, wind or any other source of electricity. Now we have seen that when it fails, the cost can be catastrophic. The critics predicted that. I did not think so, but I now see the critics were right. I am pretty sure this one accident wiped out all the savings that nuclear power every made in Japan. Probably it cost more than all the savings in the world, not just Japan. - Jed
[Vo]:Nanoplasmonic EMF enhancement
The Ni/H reactor design allows for a huge amplification factor produced by many nanoparticles in chains. An important problem in ’plasmonics’ is the question of how micro/nano particles should be designed and arranged with respect to each other to produce the strongest possible field enhancement. One possible solution to this problem is the configuration of a self-similar chain of particles with decreasing diameters [K. Li, M. I. Stockman, and D. J. Bergman.Self-similar chain of metal nanospheres as an efficient nanolens.Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 227402 (2003). http://www.phy-astr.gsu.edu/stockman/data/PRL_91_27402_2003_Stockman_Nanolens.pdf] Self-similarity requires that radii Ri and the distances di,i+1 of the spheres i and i+1 are connected by the simple relations Ri+1 = ·Ri and di+1,i+2 = ·kdi,i+1 where · k<< 1. The last condition ensures that the field of a given nanoparticle is only a weak perturbation of the previous, bigger particle. The self-similarity is not a necessary condition but it allows for an elegant notation. All particles are considered in the electrostatic limit. Now, if each of the particles enhances its driving field by a certain factor (a), then the cumulative effect of the chain of particles is a field enhancement on the order of (a)n where n is the number of particles. In other words, the enhanced field of the largest particle acts as an excitation field for the next smaller particle. The resulting enhanced field of this second particle then acts as the excitation field for the next smaller particle, and so on. For the system depicted in Fig. 12.23 of Chapter 12 Surface plasmons http://www.optics.rochester.edu/workgroups/novotny/courses/OPT463/plasmonss.pdf assuming a moderate a » 10, leads to a total field enhancement of »1000 (every factor of 10 particles produces an enhancement of 1000 or 10 to the power of 3). As we will see in the following section, field enhancements of at least 1000 are necessary to observe the Raman scattering of single molecules adsorbed onto rough metal structures. Assume the largest particle is 7*10^^-6 (7 microns) and the smallest is a nanometer or 10^^-9 , then the size difference is 1.4 * 10^^4 There is a particle size amplification of about 1. If there are 10,000 nanoparticles in the chain, there will be 1000 to the power of 3 particle enhancement factor or 1,000,000,000. That is a total enhancement factor of 10,000,000,000,000. Add the million volt nanowire enhancement in with the particle number/size enhancement and you get a big number.
Re: [Vo]:More problems in Japan
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:45 PM, wrote: > How bad is this? > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/21/fukushima-nuclear-crisis_n_3788796.html "The leak is so contaminated that a person standing 50 cm (1.6 feet) away that, after 10 hours, a worker in that proximity to the leak would develop radiation sickness with symptoms including nausea and a drop in white blood cells." Pretty bad.
[Vo]:More problems in Japan
How bad is this? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/21/fukushima-nuclear-crisis_n_3788796.html
[Vo]:LENR-CANR search for co-authors implemented
YOU CAN SEARCH FOR ANY AUTHOR NOW See Details index: http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1095 OR (bigger!): http://lenr-canr.org/index/Details/Details.php The second field is now names "All Authors." It contains all author names, separated by commas. Instructions: 1. Click the "Search" button on the top of the screen. 2. In "All Authors" enter a name, such as "McKubre." 3. Click on the "Search" button on the bottom to finish. 4. You should see all papers with McKubre as First Author or in "All Authors" (as a co-author). 5. On the top right of the screen, in blue writing it says "All Authors Contains McKubre" -- the search parameter. 6. Press "Search" again and add the keyword "tritium" and you see fewer records. On the top right it now says "All Authors Contains McKubre and Keywords Contains tritium" I also improved the Complete Bibliography (old ASCII version). See: http://lenr-canr.org/DetailOnly.htm NEXT: PAPERS WITHIN PAPERS My next project is to install a many-to-many relation where several papers can be in one document, such as one of Jean-Paul's journals. So that, for example, when you look up John O’M. Bockris, "Evidence Concerning the Mechanism of the Nuclear Reaction between Deuterium and Tritium" it will be in the index and it will open this file: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedf.pdf It would be nice if I could get it to jump right down to p. 31, where that paper begins, but last I checked that feature in Acrobat did not work. If anyone knows how to open an Acrobat file and jump to a specific page, please contact me. (Please do not suggest I read the Adobe documentation. I would rather wade through broken glass. It is even worse than Microsoft manuals.) WHY THIS IS TAKING SO LONG I had to update my local computer's version of XAMPP to do this, which is kind of a nightmare. This freeware stuff is poorly documents and chaotic in structure. It gives me dire warnings even though it is actually working: "Port 3306 in use by "C:\xampp\mysql\bin\mysqld --defaults-file=C:\xampp\mysql\bin\my.ini mysql"! MySQL WILL NOT start without the configured ports free!" I also had to get the latest version of EndNote. That works a lot faster but unfortunately this software is still chock full of bugs. For example, the import/export feature barely works. You have to use many stupid tricks such as importing "Note" into the "Name of database" field and then moving them en mass to the right field. Because the "Note" exports but does not import. It goes out but it don't come back in. Many other fields are scrambled in ways I have not yet untangled. I suspect that only a programmer from the 1980s would think to use such stupid tricks. It is second nature to me. Back then, most software barely work, or did not work at all. I did things like making a file with 120,000 records with an operating system and language that only supported 32,000 records. You don't want to know how. It wasn't pretty. Thank goodness computers nowadays work so well, and software is so reliable and fast. < /sarcasm > - Jed
[Vo]:DolphiNova WOWS ... brightest Nova in years
http://www.space.com/22419-nova-delphinus-star-explosion-stargazers-webcast. html http://earthsky.org/science-wire/bright-nova-erupts-in-constellation-delphin us 2013 is shaping up to be a 'stellar year', so to speak. When you include the surprising Chelyabinsk event and the Asteroid fly-by earlier this year and Comet Ison and now a Nova visible to the naked eye, one of the first things comes to mind is to the worried mind is: do these things have any relevance to earth... as in omens from on-high. Nahhh, probably not in the biblical sense at least ... but in the sense of the gainful OU experiment ... the one which you could be running right now, this DolphiNova could be a factor. ... or not. The reason for even mentioning it now is to ask the question to Vorticians or anyone else who may have seen a passing energy anomaly, especially around a week ago today. Those pesky gravity waves may or may not travel at lightspeed. <>
[Vo]:Positive Feedback Might be the Key
It is fairly well understood that it is difficult to measure the ash associated with an LENR system. There does not seem to be any dangerous particle or radiation emission to detect outside of the device while heat from the fusion processes appears to be the main observation to date. With these factors to consider perhaps the answer has remained hidden in the background. The mainstream physicists might have gotten it half right instead of being totally in error. Their mistake might well be in determining the reaction rate that occurs within the metal lattice. Their models are based upon effects that have been documented in plasma reactions and they do not appear to have any comparable ones measured within metals. Suppose the fusion reaction rates are indeed quite small within nickel but still many orders of magnitude greater than the extrapolated values. Furthermore, these rates might depend upon temperature in an exponential manner. The consequences of such a system could easily be that no one could verify that fusion was taking place under normal conditions. Just as we expect, little or no radiation is released and the amount of heat generated by the reaction rate under typical conditions is too small to prove to exist. This set of conditions leaves us where we normally find ourselves, low output heating and plenty of skeptical physicists who doubt our ability to measure heat accurately. Now, what if a system that works well, such as Rossi's ECAT goes a step further in its operation. The basic reaction rate for his device might match that determined by the relative number of NAE sites just as all the others that fail to perform up to our expectations. If this were the only trick up his sleeve then he would be searching desperately for heat and hence proof of useful power levels. Instead, the underlying fusion reaction rate might be multiplied by a positive feedback coupling between the NAE sites so that he gets thousands of times more energy than expected due to temperature alone. For this to work, the density of the NAE within an active region must exceed some minimum value. This is not unlike the critical mass required to initiate a chain reaction within a reactor. You play with a plasma or catalyst material which ultimately causes the density of the NAE to rise until the positive feedback takes over. Once the reaction begins within an active region, it continues until the local fuel is exhausted. If enough fuel is present, you may find a crater formed as is seen in some situations. The most likely effect seen would be a release of a burst of heat that far exceeds what would occur without the local feedback. The triggering events, which in this case are the incidental fusion reactions due to temperature or other stimuli, occur often enough to start a local chain reaction that consumes the available fuel which ceases before a super large scale reaction occurs. Hot spots would tend to be generated in a system such as I am describing and the heat released throughout the material should smooth out with time due to standard diffusion. I would assume that it would take some relaxation time for a region that has been depleted of fuel from a reaction to recover. This situation would suggest that there must be many billions of regions that contribute to the net heating. Each of these would require time to recharge their fuel until it is capable of additional ignition. If true, then a type of self regulation would appear which limits the amount of power that can be extracted from the active material. It might be possible to engineer this effect to achieve some degree of system stability. Crystal defects might actually turn out to be our friend in this particular situation. How could we find a better technique that contains the concentration of NAE within a region? I suspect that it will be important to isolate the active regions from each other to an extent. The reason being that it would be advantageous for each active region to undergo a chain reaction of the type I am suggesting without spilling over too broadly into the adjacent active regions. Adjustment of the particle sizes would contribute to the control of the active regions as well. If phonons perform the coupling then the energy would be better contained within the individual particles. Coupling between the NAE might likely be in the form of phonons. The energy would drop off rapidly with distance and they of course would not represent dangerous radiation, which is not seen. The actual individual nuclear reactions is not addressed in this post. Instead, I have been considering a system level behavioral model. There are several theories on the plate which give consideration to the release of energy per NAE reaction. Dave
Re: [Vo]:Giant Surface Plasmon Induced Drag Effect (SPIDEr) in Metal Nanowires
That helps clarify, thanks On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > The Ni/H reaction in a nutshell… > > > > Heat induced Dipole motion is step 1. > > > > High voltage/frequency EMF production is step 2. > > > > More EMF amplification by nanoparticles is step 3 > > > > EMF storage in a soliton via vortex current *whispering*-*gallery mode > wave *formation is step 4. This is how the dark mode EOV is produced. > > > > Electrostatic field and anapole magnetic field production by the soliton > is step 5 > > > > Nuclear reactions caused by EMF are the result final. > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > >> Axil, >> >> It sounds reasonable, in this post you mention "dipole" >> >> Previously you mentioned "anapole" >> >> "Kim thinks it is the electrostatic field. I think it is the anapole magnetic >> radiation that comes out of the soliton." >> >> and you have also mentioned >> >> "An EVO can be conceived of as an atom without a nucleus, or as a >> spherical monopole oscillator. EVs exhibit soliton behavior with number >> densities equal to Avagadro's number. These non-neutral electron plasmoids >> contain various levels of binding energy which exceed that of atoms, and >> allows for new types of reactions with matter." >> >> I personally don't know enough to know which type of EMF is created for >> sure but it appears there are poles there... >> >> Stewart >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >>> One of the essential functions that the Ni/H reactor does is to convert >>> heat energy into EMF energy. >>> >>> >>> >>> The 5 micron micro particle with nickel nanowire coating is the first >>> step in the energy conversion process. >>> >>> >>> >>> Surface-plasmon-induced drag-effect rectification (SPIDER) , which is >>> based on transfer of the linear momentum from decaying surface-plasmon >>> polaritons (SPPs) to the conduction electrons of a metal nanowire. The >>> SPIDER effect bears a promise to generate very high terahertz fields in the >>> vicinity of the metal nanowire. >>> >>> >>> >>> Reference: >>> >>> >>> >>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/0907.1621v1 >>> >>> >>> >>> Giant Surface Plasmon Induced Drag Effect (SPIDEr) in Metal Nanowires >>> >>> >>> >>> Giant surface plasmon-induced drag effect (SPIDEr), exists under >>> conditions of the extreme Nanoplasmonic confinement. Under realistic >>> conditions, in nanowires, this giant SPIDEr generates rectified THz >>> potential differences up to 10 V and extremely strong electric fields up to >>> 10^5-10^6 V/cm. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> In the micro-particles that start the energy conversion process from >>> heat to EMF, the nano-wires are optimized to produce extreme voltage and >>> high frequencies. The nanoparticles that contact this high voltage field >>> then generate additional dipole motion but that motion is now amplified by >>> EMF fields in the millions of volts and ultra-high frequencies. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Like a high voltage tesla coil, the primary produces extreme dipole >>> oscillations that are further amplified by energy conversion and transfer >>> down a network of connecting nanoparticle chains >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Re: [Vo]:Giant Surface Plasmon Induced Drag Effect (SPIDEr) in Metal Nanowires
The Ni/H reaction in a nutshell… Heat induced Dipole motion is step 1. High voltage/frequency EMF production is step 2. More EMF amplification by nanoparticles is step 3 EMF storage in a soliton via vortex current *whispering*-*gallery mode wave *formation is step 4. This is how the dark mode EOV is produced. Electrostatic field and anapole magnetic field production by the soliton is step 5 Nuclear reactions caused by EMF are the result final. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > Axil, > > It sounds reasonable, in this post you mention "dipole" > > Previously you mentioned "anapole" > > "Kim thinks it is the electrostatic field. I think it is the anapole magnetic > radiation that comes out of the soliton." > > and you have also mentioned > > "An EVO can be conceived of as an atom without a nucleus, or as a > spherical monopole oscillator. EVs exhibit soliton behavior with number > densities equal to Avagadro's number. These non-neutral electron plasmoids > contain various levels of binding energy which exceed that of atoms, and > allows for new types of reactions with matter." > > I personally don't know enough to know which type of EMF is created for > sure but it appears there are poles there... > > Stewart > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > >> One of the essential functions that the Ni/H reactor does is to convert >> heat energy into EMF energy. >> >> >> >> The 5 micron micro particle with nickel nanowire coating is the first >> step in the energy conversion process. >> >> >> >> Surface-plasmon-induced drag-effect rectification (SPIDER) , which is >> based on transfer of the linear momentum from decaying surface-plasmon >> polaritons (SPPs) to the conduction electrons of a metal nanowire. The >> SPIDER effect bears a promise to generate very high terahertz fields in the >> vicinity of the metal nanowire. >> >> >> >> Reference: >> >> >> >> http://arxiv.org/pdf/0907.1621v1 >> >> >> >> Giant Surface Plasmon Induced Drag Effect (SPIDEr) in Metal Nanowires >> >> >> >> Giant surface plasmon-induced drag effect (SPIDEr), exists under >> conditions of the extreme Nanoplasmonic confinement. Under realistic >> conditions, in nanowires, this giant SPIDEr generates rectified THz >> potential differences up to 10 V and extremely strong electric fields up to >> 10^5-10^6 V/cm. >> >> >> >> >> >> In the micro-particles that start the energy conversion process from heat >> to EMF, the nano-wires are optimized to produce extreme voltage and high >> frequencies. The nanoparticles that contact this high voltage field then >> generate additional dipole motion but that motion is now amplified by EMF >> fields in the millions of volts and ultra-high frequencies. >> >> >> >> >> >> Like a high voltage tesla coil, the primary produces extreme dipole >> oscillations that are further amplified by energy conversion and transfer >> down a network of connecting nanoparticle chains >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Re: [Vo]:Giant Surface Plasmon Induced Drag Effect (SPIDEr) in Metal Nanowires
Axil, It sounds reasonable, in this post you mention "dipole" Previously you mentioned "anapole" "Kim thinks it is the electrostatic field. I think it is the anapole magnetic radiation that comes out of the soliton." and you have also mentioned "An EVO can be conceived of as an atom without a nucleus, or as a spherical monopole oscillator. EVs exhibit soliton behavior with number densities equal to Avagadro's number. These non-neutral electron plasmoids contain various levels of binding energy which exceed that of atoms, and allows for new types of reactions with matter." I personally don't know enough to know which type of EMF is created for sure but it appears there are poles there... Stewart On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > One of the essential functions that the Ni/H reactor does is to convert > heat energy into EMF energy. > > > > The 5 micron micro particle with nickel nanowire coating is the first step > in the energy conversion process. > > > > Surface-plasmon-induced drag-effect rectification (SPIDER) , which is > based on transfer of the linear momentum from decaying surface-plasmon > polaritons (SPPs) to the conduction electrons of a metal nanowire. The > SPIDER effect bears a promise to generate very high terahertz fields in the > vicinity of the metal nanowire. > > > > Reference: > > > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/0907.1621v1 > > > > Giant Surface Plasmon Induced Drag Effect (SPIDEr) in Metal Nanowires > > > > Giant surface plasmon-induced drag effect (SPIDEr), exists under > conditions of the extreme Nanoplasmonic confinement. Under realistic > conditions, in nanowires, this giant SPIDEr generates rectified THz > potential differences up to 10 V and extremely strong electric fields up to > 10^5-10^6 V/cm. > > > > > > In the micro-particles that start the energy conversion process from heat > to EMF, the nano-wires are optimized to produce extreme voltage and high > frequencies. The nanoparticles that contact this high voltage field then > generate additional dipole motion but that motion is now amplified by EMF > fields in the millions of volts and ultra-high frequencies. > > > > > > Like a high voltage tesla coil, the primary produces extreme dipole > oscillations that are further amplified by energy conversion and transfer > down a network of connecting nanoparticle chains > > > > > > > > > > >
[Vo]:Giant Surface Plasmon Induced Drag Effect (SPIDEr) in Metal Nanowires
One of the essential functions that the Ni/H reactor does is to convert heat energy into EMF energy. The 5 micron micro particle with nickel nanowire coating is the first step in the energy conversion process. Surface-plasmon-induced drag-effect rectification (SPIDER) , which is based on transfer of the linear momentum from decaying surface-plasmon polaritons (SPPs) to the conduction electrons of a metal nanowire. The SPIDER effect bears a promise to generate very high terahertz fields in the vicinity of the metal nanowire. Reference: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0907.1621v1 Giant Surface Plasmon Induced Drag Effect (SPIDEr) in Metal Nanowires Giant surface plasmon-induced drag effect (SPIDEr), exists under conditions of the extreme Nanoplasmonic confinement. Under realistic conditions, in nanowires, this giant SPIDEr generates rectified THz potential differences up to 10 V and extremely strong electric fields up to 10^5-10^6 V/cm. In the micro-particles that start the energy conversion process from heat to EMF, the nano-wires are optimized to produce extreme voltage and high frequencies. The nanoparticles that contact this high voltage field then generate additional dipole motion but that motion is now amplified by EMF fields in the millions of volts and ultra-high frequencies. Like a high voltage tesla coil, the primary produces extreme dipole oscillations that are further amplified by energy conversion and transfer down a network of connecting nanoparticle chains
Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
Very good logical analysis, Bob. I agree phonons can not release nuclear energy for this reason as well as for several others. Theories based on phonon emission would appear to be in conflict with observed behavior. Ed On Aug 20, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: In the case of craters and mini-explosions, regardless of the true nature of a nano-NAE, it is interesting to consider the implications of explosion to the nature of the excited nucleus energy release. If the energy were released by phonons, the temperature would be highest near the NAE and would decrease rapidly with radius from the NAE. This would cause the NAE to self-destruct before the surrounding area is heated very hot. It would cause the explosions to be nano-scale. However, if the energy were released as photons, the absorption would be spread over a larger diameter (depending on wavelength) and the NAE would not get as hot as quickly as it would in the case of phonons. The fact that enough heat has been seen to have been released by a nano-scale NAE (or set of them) to cause a micro-scale explosion suggests to me that the nuclear energy is released by photons, not phonons. Bob On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Edmund Storms wrote: Paul, I propose the craters result where the concentration of NAE is so great that local heat cannot escape fast enough. Consequently, runnaway occurs, i.e. positive feedback takes place through the increasing temperature. This melts the local area, but does not affect heat being produced elsewhere. The melting point of the surface is significantly less than pure Pd and a load of gas is suddenly released in the process, a combination that creates the crater appearance. No need exists to add oscillators or resonance to the explanation. The process is very simple and totally consistent with expected behavior Ed Storms. On Aug 20, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Paul Breed wrote: My NAE question... If you follow the conclusions in the Nagel poster/paper on craters presented in the poster section of ICCF-18 This paper talked about the energy necessary to make the craters that seem to be a feature of "active" cathodes Given that paper I will make some assumptions : 1)At least 10^6 reactions occur in one local area to make a cathode crater. (This assumes ~24MEv per reaction lower energy reactions would increase this number) 2)I find it hard to imagine any physical NAE configuration/ construction of lattice crack etc that could: a)Survive that much energy. b)Manage to get 10^6 sets of reaction productions in place and remove 10^6 units of ash. So given this simple paper I find it hard to not conclude that NAE active regions are either Groups of mutually oscillators with reinforcing resonances... causing batch activity... Some sort of chain reaction that occurs. Note that the speed of nuclear reactions vs the speed of sound in the lattice would allow some combination of a special environment and chain reaction to both be true as the nuclear chain reaction would propagate before the special lattice region could be destroyed. Are these assumptions off base?
RE: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
I don't think there is any denying the plasma is there..hence the descriptive name Black Light Power adopted by Mill's but yes to only mention the heat shock assumes the audience is already aware that this is but one factor combined with required geometry of conductive surfaces and as yet still to be determined other criteria. Fran From: Arnaud Kodeck [mailto:arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:06 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment How a heat shock can produce plasma? From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: mardi 20 août 2013 20:49 To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment Rossi uses heat shock to produce plasma. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Arnaud Kodeck mailto:arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>> wrote: Axil, There is no plasma pulse in the rossi reactor ! Quoting Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>: Testing. What both builders of the Ni/H reactor have done is to find the proper pulse rate for the plasma creation reaction through trial and error testing. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:29 AM, David Roberson mailto:dlrober...@aol.com>> wrote: Axil, You discuss the destruction and reformation of NAE over a finite period of time. Do you think that there is some negative feedback mechanism in effect which forces the new formations to match the old ones that have been destroyed? It seems logical that a process that does not have a direct connection between production and destruction of NAE would proceed to either thermal run away or ultimate cool down. I suppose that a process might originate where elevated temperature results in that destruction being enhanced, particularly in the hot spots. The question is: What keeps the process in balance according to your hypothesis? Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> To: vortex-l mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>> Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 10:23 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment LENR is driven by a specific topology that directs electrons into the special motions and concentrations which result in the LENR reaction. Cracks are a good example of this topology in that through the discontinuity of the lattice that a crack provides, dipole motion meets a boundary condition that forces electrons to follow a circular path as a vortex electron currents forms. This dislocation of dipole motion must occur at the surface of a metal at the boundary between the metal a dielectric isolator. The downside of a permanent lattice structure like a crack is that it will deteriorate over time due to the stresses placed on its topology as nuclear reactions occur in and around this boundary location. The crack will erode over time and the special conditions that cause the electrons to behave in this special way will no longer be preserved over extended time. But discontinuities in dipole movement will also occur between nano-particles and micro particles. These discontinuities will be continually reformed and dispersed in a dynamic process as the particles float and bump around in the turbulent motion of a hot hydrogen atmosphere. These nanoparticles will also be destroyed by nuclear activity, but that can be occasionally rebuilt out of the condensation process after the plasma stage produced by a hot heater element or a spark discharge. In this way, the NAE, is continually rebuilt at a fixed rate that exactly counters the rate of destruction caused in these particles by nuclear activity. The effective LENR reaction is a fluid process of continual destruction and renewal that any solid structure cannot duplicate. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Edmund Storms mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com>>wrote: Terry, the problem is psychological, not scientific. Understanding CF requires a change in perspective, which is hard for many people to do. You need to look at the system in which the nuclear reaction occurs from the perspective of the assembly of atoms, i.e. like a chemist does. The chemical system os constructed by interaction of the electrons and this interaction has very clear rules. Any change required to initiate a nuclear reaction will be communicated to this assembly and cause changes before the change will be experienced by the nucleus. That process provides the basic limitation to any mechanism proposed to occur in the lattice itself. In other words, to cause a nuclear effect, the chemical structure will also be affected in ways that will stop the nuclear process. This is how a chemical system is known to behave based on centuries of experience by chemists and by examining material over geological time. A change in perspective is REQUIRED before a person can fully appreciate the role of the chemical system. That is why a condition must be created outside of the rules that apply to the chemical system.
RE: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
How a heat shock can produce plasma? _ From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: mardi 20 août 2013 20:49 To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment Rossi uses heat shock to produce plasma. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Arnaud Kodeck wrote: Axil, There is no plasma pulse in the rossi reactor ! Quoting Axil Axil : Testing. What both builders of the Ni/H reactor have done is to find the proper pulse rate for the plasma creation reaction through trial and error testing. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:29 AM, David Roberson wrote: Axil, You discuss the destruction and reformation of NAE over a finite period of time. Do you think that there is some negative feedback mechanism in effect which forces the new formations to match the old ones that have been destroyed? It seems logical that a process that does not have a direct connection between production and destruction of NAE would proceed to either thermal run away or ultimate cool down. I suppose that a process might originate where elevated temperature results in that destruction being enhanced, particularly in the hot spots. The question is: What keeps the process in balance according to your hypothesis? Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 10:23 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment LENR is driven by a specific topology that directs electrons into the special motions and concentrations which result in the LENR reaction. Cracks are a good example of this topology in that through the discontinuity of the lattice that a crack provides, dipole motion meets a boundary condition that forces electrons to follow a circular path as a vortex electron currents forms. This dislocation of dipole motion must occur at the surface of a metal at the boundary between the metal a dielectric isolator. The downside of a permanent lattice structure like a crack is that it will deteriorate over time due to the stresses placed on its topology as nuclear reactions occur in and around this boundary location. The crack will erode over time and the special conditions that cause the electrons to behave in this special way will no longer be preserved over extended time. But discontinuities in dipole movement will also occur between nano-particles and micro particles. These discontinuities will be continually reformed and dispersed in a dynamic process as the particles float and bump around in the turbulent motion of a hot hydrogen atmosphere. These nanoparticles will also be destroyed by nuclear activity, but that can be occasionally rebuilt out of the condensation process after the plasma stage produced by a hot heater element or a spark discharge. In this way, the NAE, is continually rebuilt at a fixed rate that exactly counters the rate of destruction caused in these particles by nuclear activity. The effective LENR reaction is a fluid process of continual destruction and renewal that any solid structure cannot duplicate. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Edmund Storms wrote: Terry, the problem is psychological, not scientific. Understanding CF requires a change in perspective, which is hard for many people to do. You need to look at the system in which the nuclear reaction occurs from the perspective of the assembly of atoms, i.e. like a chemist does. The chemical system os constructed by interaction of the electrons and this interaction has very clear rules. Any change required to initiate a nuclear reaction will be communicated to this assembly and cause changes before the change will be experienced by the nucleus. That process provides the basic limitation to any mechanism proposed to occur in the lattice itself. In other words, to cause a nuclear effect, the chemical structure will also be affected in ways that will stop the nuclear process. This is how a chemical system is known to behave based on centuries of experience by chemists and by examining material over geological time. A change in perspective is REQUIRED before a person can fully appreciate the role of the chemical system. That is why a condition must be created outside of the rules that apply to the chemical system. The region INSIDE a crack provides this environment. Events occurring in this region would not affect or be affected by the chemical structure, hence could form a condition able to initiate a nuclear reaction. This is a very basic insight that cannot be "falsified" in the usual way. It requires a change in perspective to be evaluated. This situation is similar to how the relationship between the Sun and Earth was once explained, A change in perspective was required before the correct analysis could be done. Before this change in perspective occurred, very convincing mathematical analysis showed that the Sun circled the Earth, as was obvious to any casual observer. The tools available at the time could not
