Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of “Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-16 Thread mixent
In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:07:12 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I suppose the press will hear of this, and will be asking questions.

One can only hope! :)

- Jed
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of “Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-15 Thread Peter Gluck
a word is missing: technological I will comment at Daniele's blog.
Otherwise he cannot claim the paternity of Cold Fusion, or of Ni-H LENR.

Peter

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 On 2011-04-15 03:01, Jed Rothwell wrote:

 I assume this part is accurately translated:

 So there were two parallel lines of research: on one side, the
 deuterium and palladium people, who never got anything . . .[...]


 Yes, it is. Several people on discussion boards I read on the matter have
 criticized that excerpt from the original audio interview for the same
 reasons (and also, because in my opinion it reinforces skeptics' argument
 that FP' experiments were a scam. Many still think that).

 Cheers,
 S.A.




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of “Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
I guess Focardi must have meant there has been no significant technological
progress. After all, he did mention Fleischmann's explosion. (He has it
going the wrong direction.)

- Jed


[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of “Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
I am surprised no one else has picked up on this. This part of the Focardi
interview is likely to put the President of Greece and the Min. of Energy in
the hot seat:

it was easy to convince the Greek President, the minister... Consequently
Greece has signed a contract with Rossi and can build these devices.

I suppose the press will hear of this, and will be asking questions.

- Jed


[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of “Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-15 Thread Peter Gluck
What I wanted to say with the missing word technological?
The truth is that Pd-D LENR has contributed to science but has not succeeded
to become an energy source.
If it ever will, that's an open question but in the spirit of fairness you
cannot tell that Pd- D is nothing.
The second non-ethical aspect in Focardi's discourse was that he well knows
that Piantelii is the leading scientist in the field of Ni-H but he just
mentioned en passant about Habel *and *Piantelli, as somebody of no
importance.
Peter

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:32 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 2011-04-15 16:04, Jed Rothwell wrote:

 But Peter Gluck wrote: . . . one word is missing: 'technological.'

 What do you mean by missing word? Did Focardi say this and it is
 missing from the translation? Or did he fail to say this and he should
 have?


 He didn't say that in the interview and in retrospect he should have.
 I don't believe he really thinks there haven't been positive results from
 Pd-D LENR research, he was more referring to their scale. In that sense he
 is somewhat right that the difference between those and his/Rossi's is so
 large that in practical terms other researchers haven't got anything so far.


  You see that he is outspoken and he says all kinds of things, including
 stuff better left unsaid. Maybe he was just exaggerating, or mouthing
 off. It is hard to believe he does not know there have been positive
 results from palladium.


 It was a very informal interview on a local radio station (located in
 Bologna) with people that he already knew and already invited him a few
 times in the past months. Focardi probably didn't expect that an
 international audience would dissect it word by word, so he spoke without
 filters as he, reportedly, usually does.

 Cheers,
 S.A.




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of Ni-H Cold-Fusion\ [English translation]

2011-04-15 Thread Axil Axil
Mössbauer spectroscopy is a
spectroscopichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopytechnique
based on the recoil-free, resonant absorption and emission of gamma
rays http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray in
solidshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid.
This resonant emission and absorption was first observed by Rudolf
Mössbauerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_M%C3%B6ssbauerduring
his graduate studies in 1957, and is called the Mössbauer
effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B6ssbauer_effect in his honor.
Mössbauer received a Nobel Prize in 1961 for this work.

Like NMR spectroscopy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NMR_spectroscopy,
Mössbauer spectroscopy probes tiny changes in the energy levels of an atomic
nucleus in response to its environment. Typically, three types of nuclear
interaction http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_interaction may be
observed: an isomer shift http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer_shift, also
known as a chemical shift
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_shift; quadrupole
splitting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupole_splitting; and, magnetic
or hyperfine splitting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperfine_splitting,
also known as the Zeeman effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeeman_effect.
Due to the high energy and extremely narrow
linehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_linewidths of gamma rays,
Mössbauer spectroscopy is one of the most sensitive
techniques in terms of energy (and hence frequency) resolution, capable of
detecting change in just a few parts per 10e11.





Depending on the local environment of the Fe atoms and the magnetic
properties, Mössbauer spectra of iron oxides can consist of a singlet, a
doublet, or a sextet. If the iron is superparamagnetic a telltale hyperfine
sextet structure will be detected.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:26 PM, francis froarty...@comcast.net wrote:

 Jed wrote [snip]

 Focardi says some things that are supposed to be confidential. I will leave

 it to the reader to find those bits, as an exercise. He's got a big mouth.

 I'll bet this ruffles some feathers![/snip]



 Focardi says “and then there's this chemical compound. The issue came up
 during that demonstration because, when some people tried to measure the
 gamma rays, Rossi objected, because by measuring the gamma rays they would
 have also measured the gamma rays emitted by this secret compound, and so
 they would have understood what it was, what was in it.”



 He is revealing that it is a chemical compound that emits gamma rays…. That
 it participates in the nuclear reaction?



 Fran







[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of “Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
I assume this part is accurately translated:

So there were two parallel lines of research: on one side, the deuterium
and palladium people, who never got anything . . .

I have heard he feels that way. Maybe he means they have made little
progress toward technology, which is true, but I get the impression he has
the same attitude as Arata or Steve Jones: I'm right; everyone else is
wrong.

He and Rossi have done great work and made immortal contributions to science
and human progress. Why should he be such a petty jerk? Why lie about other
people's research?

Rossi is very gracious toward others, Fleischmann especially.

- Jed


[Vo]:RE: [Vo]: Sergio Focardi, the father of Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-14 Thread Jones Beene
Isn't it ironic in a way, since you have said before that Arata shares a
similar level of vanity ?

 

Arata probably considers himself the father of nanoparticle LENR . without
which, Ni-H might not be possible.

 

. so who's you daddy ?

 

From: Jed Rothwell 


So there were two parallel lines of research: on one side, the deuterium
and palladium people, who never got anything . . .

 

I have heard he feels that way. Maybe he means they have made little
progress toward technology, which is true, but I get the impression he has
the same attitude as Arata or Steve Jones: I'm right; everyone else is
wrong.

 



[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of “Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
There is a lot of meat in this report. Read it carefully. A lot of food for
thought. And for gossip!

Focardi clearly says that the Cu isotopes are NOT natural. This contradicts
Essen, as noted here. Mass spectroscopy can be tricky, that's all I know. I
have seen many similar disagreements about isotopes.

(By the way, many people have suggested that enhancing one isotope or
another in the catalyst might boost the reaction. That idea has been around
for years.)

Focardi says some things that are supposed to be confidential. I will leave
it to the reader to find those bits, as an exercise. He's got a big mouth.
I'll bet this ruffles some feathers!

I enjoy the big mouth but I wish his ego was smaller, and his attitude more
gracious. Sigh . . .

Rossi was smart not to tell him what the two magic elements are. He would
have blabbed 'em. He says, I don't want to know. I'll bet there's a lot of
other stuff in this article Rossi wishes Focardi did not know. I advise
readers to save a copy in case they decide to delete it.

As in so many other reports from these people, there are claims that seem
outlandish to me, being far wrong on the scale of nuclear versus chemical
reactions. They remind of someone who told me he could see bubbles of helium
rising from a cathode. He did not realize that the energy produced by one
visible bubble would be enough to blow him and most of the neighborhood to
smithereens. Focardi says:


. . . the latest application has nickel inside it, then the hydrogen is
supplied by electrolysis, so that … because you cannot keep a hydrogen tank
at home, of course, it’s dangerous. Instead we generated it from water by
electrolysis.

So, the device kept on working [in heat after death], and I thought to
myself: I guess I’m going to have to use a hammer to stop it. Until one
day Rossi told me “I stopped it!”. And how did you do that?. He said: I
cut the power to the electrolysis, obviously. Right! All you have to do is
run the electrolysis from a separate power source. You cut the power off
there, and once the hydrogen is used up, the device stops by itself.


Oh, yeah? How long does that take? I would believe it if they said they
opened the valve and degassed it, or inserted nitrogen. But cutting off the
hydrogen supply and leaving pressure intact would leave enough hydrogen to
run for a couple of years, I suppose. Maybe I'm missing something?

How long would it take if Mills is correct? Does this rapid falling off in
the reaction indicate that the hydrogen is consumed much faster than in a
conventional nuclear reaction?

And they never thought to degas it before that? Hmm m m . . . If they had
called me on the phone, that's the first thing I would have suggested.
Followed by a thermal shock.

(BTW, I don't know why the response I just posted came out a new thread.)

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]: Sergio Focardi, the father of Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 Isn’t it ironic in a way, since you have said before that Arata shares a
 similar level of vanity ?


Yup. I would hate to bring those two together.



 Arata probably considers himself the father of nanoparticle LENR … without
 which, Ni-H might not be possible.


I think everyone would acknowledge he is the father of nanoparticle LENR.

That's what I don't get about these people. Everyone in cold
fusion acknowledges that Arata has made vital contributions. They have told
him that, giving him awards and special sessions. Same in other fields. Both
Emperors gave him medals. The Welding Institute established an award in his
name:

http://www.iiw-iis.org/TheIIW/Recognition/Pages/Arata.aspx

I am sure he deserves every honor! That's not my point.

You would think that person whose ego has been stroked by so many people
would feel a sense of magnanimity . . . or noblesse oblige, or a sense that
he has made it to top and there no need to step on anyone else or denigrate
them to make himself look better. Yet the praise heaped upon him seems to
make him less secure, and more anxious for more homage. He is like one of
these rock stars, like Michael Jackson, that wretched man.

Arthur C. Clarke had a tremendous ego. He and his friends joked about it. He
used to send out circulars titled EGOgram. He was anxious to amass
recognition and awards, and he loved to drop names. He, too, deserved every
award that came his way. But he was the polar opposite of Arata in
personality. He was the nicest, friendliest person you would ever want to
meet. (We never did meet, but I spoke with him on the phone.) He would never
put on airs or boast. He loved animals and children. He grew up on a farm
and was good with horses.

His biographer McAleer described his egomania, and he did not mind a bit. It
was an authorized biography. He told me he learned a lot from it. I
reminded him that it described his habit in youth of keeping a record of
orgasms in his diary, and proudly pointing out to all and sundry that he
exceeded the Kinsey report averages. He was taken aback. He had completely
forgotten that and thought it was hysterical. Evidently the book was not too
carefully authorized since he had overlooked that. But he was a the last
person in the world who would worry about appearing . . . undignified, I
guess you would call it.

He and Chris Tinsley were the funniest people I have ever known.

Cold fusion has attracted a cast of characters, that's for sure. Rossi tops
them all. The news and the buzz he generates, the mind-boggling claims he
makes, and the aura of the unexpected he emanates is stronger than the field
strength generated by #2 through #10 strange-aura researchers tied together.
THAT is quite an accomplishment in this business.

He is also a sweet fellow. Kind of aggravating at times, but who isn't? I do
not think he intends for every word in his blog to be taken seriously. He
has a devious sense of humor.

- Jed


[Vo]:[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of Ni-H Cold-Fusion\ [English translation]

2011-04-14 Thread francis
Jed wrote [snip] 

Focardi says some things that are supposed to be confidential. I will leave

it to the reader to find those bits, as an exercise. He's got a big mouth.

I'll bet this ruffles some feathers![/snip]

 

Focardi says and then there's this chemical compound. The issue came up
during that demonstration because, when some people tried to measure the
gamma rays, Rossi objected, because by measuring the gamma rays they would
have also measured the gamma rays emitted by this secret compound, and so
they would have understood what it was, what was in it.

 

He is revealing that it is a chemical compound that emits gamma rays.. That
it participates in the nuclear reaction?

 

Fran

 

 



Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of “Ni-H Cold-Fusion [English translation]

2011-04-14 Thread mixent
In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:50:39 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
How long would it take if Mills is correct? Does this rapid falling off in
the reaction indicate that the hydrogen is consumed much faster than in a
conventional nuclear reaction?

It well may. If a fast cloning process is responsible for the energy, then it
should stop pretty much instantly upon removal of Hydrogen supply. However with
Hydrogen dissolved in a Nickel powder, removal of the external supply wouldn't
immediately remove all the Hydrogen from the reactor.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



Re: [Vo]:[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi, the father of Ni-H Cold-Fusion\ [English translation]

2011-04-14 Thread mixent
In reply to  francis 's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 23:26:42 -0400:
Hi,

Not necessarily. It could be producing an x-ray spectrum due to stimulation by
ionizing radiation produced elsewhere.

[snip]
Jed wrote [snip] 

Focardi says some things that are supposed to be confidential. I will leave

it to the reader to find those bits, as an exercise. He's got a big mouth.

I'll bet this ruffles some feathers![/snip]

 

Focardi says and then there's this chemical compound. The issue came up
during that demonstration because, when some people tried to measure the
gamma rays, Rossi objected, because by measuring the gamma rays they would
have also measured the gamma rays emitted by this secret compound, and so
they would have understood what it was, what was in it.

 

He is revealing that it is a chemical compound that emits gamma rays.. That
it participates in the nuclear reaction?

 

Fran

 

 
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html