Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread FZNIDARSIC
My paper was accepted there for publication.  It is no wonder that I  have 
mostly given up and 
am not actively working on new energy technology any more.
 
This is a sad day indeed.
 
Frank Znidarsic


Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread Esa Ruoho
so they won - by getting you to "mostly give up and not actively work on new
energy technology any more". how splendid!
if only everyone else was as easy as that.


On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM,  wrote:

>  My paper was accepted there for publication.  It is no wonder that I have
> mostly given up and
> am not actively working on new energy technology any more.
>
> This is a sad day indeed.
>
> Frank Znidarsic
>


RE: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan

Oh no:  This is 'not' 'giving-up.'  This merely means that the 'game-is-afoot' 
in 'earnest as of this moment.'  This is the point that 'everyone' retires to 
their respective 'neutral corners' and REGROUPS, reboots, and 
digs-in-for-the-HOME STRETCH. . . extremely 'serious-stuff,' this. . .

 

In short:  Ultimately this is 'good-news.'-JHO-
 


Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:48:30 +0300
Subject: Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings
From: esaru...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

so they won - by getting you to "mostly give up and not actively work on new 
energy technology any more". how splendid!
if only everyone else was as easy as that.




On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM,  wrote:



My paper was accepted there for publication.  It is no wonder that I have 
mostly given up and 
am not actively working on new energy technology any more.
 
This is a sad day indeed.
 
Frank Znidarsic
  

Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread fznidarsic

No its not.  We have no resources, no credibility, and nowhere else to go.  
The fields and its people have been kicked and kicked again.
I have only so much energy.  Even Jed must be getting tired.  
Sooner or later the whole thing will die.
I am still scheduled to speak at International  Conference for Space 
Exploration.
Tom Valone is the organizer.  Lets see how long it takes for this to also get 
kicked out.
Tom was already kicked out of the state dept once.

Frank Znidarsic





-Original Message-
From: Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 7, 2010 11:46 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings


Oh no:  This is 'not' 'giving-up.'  This merely means that the 'game-is-afoot' 
in 'earnest as of this moment.'  This is the point that 'everyone' retires to 
their respective 'neutral corners' and REGROUPS, reboots, and 
digs-in-for-the-HOME STRETCH. . . extremely 'serious-stuff,' this. . .
 
In short:  Ultimately this is 'good-news.'-JHO-
 
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:48:30 +0300
Subject: Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings
From: esaru...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

so they won - by getting you to "mostly give up and not actively work on new 
energy technology any more". how splendid! 
if only everyone else was as easy as that.




On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM,  wrote:


My paper was accepted there for publication.  It is no wonder that I have 
mostly given up and 
am not actively working on new energy technology any more.
 
This is a sad day indeed.
 
Frank Znidarsic



= 


Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Frank Znidarsic wrote:

We have no resources, no credibility, and nowhere else to go.
>

I agree.



> Even Jed must be getting tired. Sooner or later the whole thing will die.
>

Indeed. I am getting tired, and I do fear that the field will die when the
last researcher dies. People such as Patterson and Les Case died leaving no
trace of their work and no chance that anyone will replicate them.



> Tom Valone is the organizer.  Lets see how long it takes for this to also
> get kicked out.
> Tom was already kicked out of the state dept once.
>

He was kicked out of a meeting room in the State Department when Park and
Zimmerman pulled strings. He was fired from the Patent Office because he
talks about cold fusion and various forms of "o-u" energy. He was reinstated
after years of hearings and administrative procedures. If that was a
victory, I would hate to see defeat.

- Jed


RE: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan

I'll stick with my original 'take' on this:  The 'kicking out of'/suppression' 
of groups/individuals that are getting 'too close' to this

thing relative to potential &/or already achieved-tech along these lines is a 
VERY SPECIFIC INDICATOR, seen accurately; which is a huge heads-up/stimulus.

 

Like I said before:  Regroup & dig-in; ergo, GET CREATIVE. Cheers 
Friends~:-)-JHO-
 


To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:26:44 -0400
From: fznidar...@aol.com


No its not.  We have no resources, no credibility, and nowhere else to go.  
The fields and its people have been kicked and kicked again.
I have only so much energy.  Even Jed must be getting tired.  
Sooner or later the whole thing will die.
I am still scheduled to speak at International  Conference for Space 
Exploration.
Tom Valone is the organizer.  Lets see how long it takes for this to also get 
kicked out.
Tom was already kicked out of the state dept once.
 
Frank Znidarsic




-Original Message-
From: Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 7, 2010 11:46 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings




Oh no:  This is 'not' 'giving-up.'  This merely means that the 'game-is-afoot' 
in 'earnest as of this moment.'  This is the point that 'everyone' retires to 
their respective 'neutral corners' and REGROUPS, reboots, and 
digs-in-for-the-HOME STRETCH. . . extremely 'serious-stuff,' this. . .
 
In short:  Ultimately this is 'good-news.'-JHO-
 


Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:48:30 +0300
Subject: Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings
From: esaru...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

so they won - by getting you to "mostly give up and not actively work on new 
energy technology any more". how splendid! 
if only everyone else was as easy as that.




On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM,  wrote:



My paper was accepted there for publication.  It is no wonder that I have 
mostly given up and 
am not actively working on new energy technology any more.
 
This is a sad day indeed.
 
Frank Znidarsic
= 

RE: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan

"He was kicked out of a meeting room in the State Department when Park and 
Zimmerman pulled strings. He was fired from the Patent Office because he talks 
about cold fusion and various forms of "o-u" energy. He was reinstated after 
years of hearings and administrative procedures. If that was a victory, I would 
hate to see defeat."

 

Amigo's:  I remember another cautionary-tale of an EX-'Patent Office employee' 
loser that the established big-boys wanted to stifle & erase in the 
'worst-way.'  His name was Albert Einstein.

 

And as for Patterson & Les Case:  'You-all' remember them and have just let the 
entire world know about them. . .

 

I see the reverse point.  The whole world knows Nikola Tesla even though the 
Edison-cartel did their worst to erase Tesla. . .

Tesla died broke--->& quite alone. . .

 

Who do we appreciate now?

 

QUOTE:  "Quit yer whinnin." (My Mom~;-)
 


Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:48:44 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

Frank Znidarsic wrote:




We have no resources, no credibility, and nowhere else to go.


I agree.


 

Even Jed must be getting tired. Sooner or later the whole thing will die.


Indeed. I am getting tired, and I do fear that the field will die when the last 
researcher dies. People such as Patterson and Les Case died leaving no trace of 
their work and no chance that anyone will replicate them.


 

Tom Valone is the organizer.  Lets see how long it takes for this to also get 
kicked out.
Tom was already kicked out of the state dept once.


He was kicked out of a meeting room in the State Department when Park and 
Zimmerman pulled strings. He was fired from the Patent Office because he talks 
about cold fusion and various forms of "o-u" energy. He was reinstated after 
years of hearings and administrative procedures. If that was a victory, I would 
hate to see defeat.


- Jed

  

Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread Harry Veeder
I wonder if Steve Kirvit is looking into this.

Harry


>
>From: Jed Rothwell 
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Thu, October 7, 2010 9:08:46 AM
>Subject: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings
>
>
>On October 5, the AIP sent the attached letter to Jan Marwan abruptly 
>cancelling 
>the New Energy Technology Symposium Proceedings. See the letter and a memo 
>from 
>Marwan, below.
>
>
>We will probably upload the papers from these proceedings to LENR-CANR.org. We 
>will probably do this soon, since the AIP's decision appears to be irrevocable.
>
>
>This is disappointing. Marwin did a lot of work on these proceedings, and they 
>would have enhanced the status of cold fusion. We do not know why the AIP 
>cancelled. I can speculate that someone opposed to cold fusion is behind the 
>decision, but I have no knowledge of that.
>
>
>- Jed
>
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
>
>Maya Flikop
>Director Special Publications and Proceedings
>American Institute of Physics
>Suite 1NO1, 2 Huntington Quadrangle
>Melville , NY 11747
>
>
>
>October 5, 2010
>
>
>Dr. Jan Marwan
>Forschung & Entwicklung
>Rudower Chaussee , 29
>D-12489 Berlin, GERMANY
>
>
>Dear Dr. Marwan:
>
>
>Having received the technical presentation and PDF files related to the “New 
>Energy
>Technology Symposium”, AIP’s Publisher’s Office has had a chance to evaluate 
the
>contents of the material presented. Based on this evaluation, AIP has decided 
to
>exercise its right under Section C.1(a) of the Publishing Contract to decline 
>publishing
>the proceedings and materials as an AIP publication.
>
>
>As an accommodation to the Symposium Organizers, AIP would be willing to 
>facilitate
>the printing of the Volume book for the attendees of the Symposium, including 
>the
>title page, table of contents, and index, which will be otherwise prepared in
>accordance with the technical specifications. Because we are declining the 
>print 
>or
>electronic publication of such materials as an AIP publication, we will not 
>seek 
>any
>copyright rights, nor will AIP include its name on the book materials. If the 
>Symposium
>Organizers would like to have the Volume book printed, AIP can prepare and 
>provide
>such print proceedings at a reduced price of $27 per copy. This reduction in 
>price is
>being offered strictly as a courtesy. The Symposium Organizers are also free 
>to 
>find
>another printer or publisher for its materials.
>
>
>As an additional courtesy to assist the Symposium with finding a suitable 
>publisher, AIP
>can provide you with a PDF file of the entire Volume so that you may use it at 
>your
>discretion for online applications. No affiliation with AIP should be stated 
>or 
>implied in
>connection with any such publication.
>
>
>Please let me know if you would like any of the books printed, and if so, how 
>many. If
>you have any other questions, please feel free to contact me. I look forward 
>to 
>hearing
>from you.
>
>
>Thanks and best regards,
>
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
>Dear colleagues,
>Same as you I am disappointed that at final stage our AIP conference 
>proceedings, although already published on the AIP web site (Table of content, 
>title, abstract, ISBN and price), has been declined. As you noticed, from the 
>email by the AIP that I forwarded to you, the director of the AIP publishing 
>service is missing a detailed explanation for her unexpected decision. I leave 
>it to you to require specific details on that issue from the AIP.
>Jed Rothwell suggested to publish this volume on his website and Scott Chubb 
>suggested to publish it in his journal. I am sending both the whole volume 
>that 
>I submitted to the AIP on June 29.
>Jan Marwan
>
>



Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan  wrote:

Amigo's:  I remember another cautionary-tale of an EX-'Patent Office
> employee' loser that the established big-boys wanted to stifle & erase in
> the 'worst-way.'  His name was Albert Einstein.
>

That is about the stupidest thing I have ever read here on Vortex.

Einstein was a highly valued employee at the Patent Office, but in 1909 he
was lured away by the best physicists in Europe to the university of his
choice, where he set the terms and conditions. He was given a professorship
with no teaching responsibilities (what he wanted). He was a star academic;
one of the hottest, most sought-after scientists in academic history. No one
ever tried to "stifle" him. In 1921 they gave him the Nobel Prize.

Please, Jack, learn a little history.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-07 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 01:48 PM 10/7/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Indeed. I am getting tired, and I do fear that the field will die 
when the last researcher dies. People such as Patterson and Les Case 
died leaving no trace of their work and no chance that anyone will 
replicate them.


Jed, don't give up. Seriously. There are so many other positive 
signs. Not the least of these is Ed Storms being appointed to the 
editorial board of Naturwissenschaften, and the publication of that 
review, "Status of cold fusion, 2010."


Seriously, the AIP publication would have looked good, but those were 
all just a notch up from conference papers. Maybe the AIP didn't like 
the standards, but, from the beginning this has been the physicists 
against the chemists. Bauer on Pathological Science. Have you read 
that paper? He talks about the "pathological science" concept, 
thoroughly debunks it, and with special reference to cold fusion. It 
was published under peer review, I believe, and is on-line. Come to 
think of it, shouldn't this be in the bibliographies? Britz put in 
other papers that were not as much on point as Bauer




RE: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-08 Thread Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan
gely FOR THEM.  The 
Hitler-Holocaust largely gutted those trends, but that was hardly guaranteed 
had Rommel for instance set the Jewish prison-camps free and sponsored the 
Zionist Establishment of Israel instead of later in 1948.

 

FORGOTTON HISTORY:  England was 'before Germany-crimes' was MONSTROUSLY GUILTY 
of machine-gunning Jews on decks of Zionist-ships to Palestine and often 
'sinking' those refugee ships full of Jews.  FACT:  Menachim Begin's 
HAGANAH/MOSSAD was created to FIGHT THE BRITISH brutal anti-Semitic Pogrom 
against establishment of the STATE of ISRAEL.  When the 3rd-Reich's initial 
anti-Semitic campaign/Crystal-Nacht etc. FIRST SOLUTION was simply to ship the 
German-Jewish Population to 'exile' in Palestine.  BUT British backed/sponsored 
Mufti-Husseini/Wahabi-Prince of Jerusalem was 'counciled' to MAKE A PACT WITH 
THE WAFFEN-SS to become FIELD MARSHALL OF THE ARAB LEGION who with HIMMLER 
DESIGNED the DEATH-CAMP-JEWISH-EXTERMINATION SYSTEM while the BRITISH SENT THE 
JEWISH REFUGEES-->BACK TO GERMANY!

 

Oh yes:  History could easily bounced another direction and from those 'insane' 
days VERY NEARLY DID!

 

Current Britain would VERY MUCH rather be giving credit for quasi-RELATIVITY 
etc. to the LUCASIAN-CHAIR etc. 'rather' than crediting Eintein if they 
possibly could have swung it as well. . . .but the 'BOMB' changed all that. . . 
.

 

In short:  Einstein's popularity & support in the largely anti-semitic United 
States & Britain of those days would have been 'tenuous' at best had events 
even 'slightly'  been altered and the Hitler-3rd Reich been villified as a 
relative 'small cadre' of villains while a 'Heroic Rommel' duely 'hung them 
all' and somewhat 'redeemed' the German War effort as an 
ANTI-BOLSHEVIC/ANTI-COMMUNIST eventual ally of the west.  Subsequently> No East 
Germany/No Berlin Wall etc. . . .

 

Consider alternate events track:>NO BOMB---Pinko Einstein--->Massive Propaganda 
blaming Jewish Marx-Lenin-Trotsky-Stalin etc.(NOW HAPPENING IN RUSSIA)--a la' 
past>-->(Stalin-Holocaust=50 Million-plus slaughter of Russians)>NO 1948 
American backing & Establishment of the State of Israel under a PRO-America 
First/Pro Rommelesque Germany)>and in THAT WORLD-->Semitic-Pinko Albert 
Einstein is NOT lionized, nor sponsored, nor given credit for even an EVENTUAL 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of 'Relativity-E=MC^2.'  UPSHOT:  Some other PC-Acceptable 
personage such as Zsilard or Boehr or Planck would have been given the credit 
for Eintein's brain-child.

 

Albert Einstein's notoriety & success were dependent upon a huge convergence of 
fortuitous events.  Lucky for us that they did converge.

 

YOU who JUST CAN'T seem to get peer-recognition which generates the 
LAY-PUBLIC-ACKNOWLEDGEMENT to get LENR-CANR  --'funded!'---> don't get 
it, that even OUR/YOUR even knowing WHO EINSTEIN IS dependent entirely on the 
same type of convergence of factors that is so far NOT HAPPENING FOR YOU. . .  
"What a concept!"

 

Is success/notoriety fair or just or inevitable?  Just & fair are IRRELEVANT to 
the currents of history.  And how many quasi-dimensions of the above 
'alternative histories' have/are happening?  Some think that they 'all' are 
fact--->somewhere/somewhen. . . Is this a 'credible' notion?

 

HISTORICAL FACT Synthesis is a 'science' in which I posit that 'you' are 
severely deficient.  You think that this 'scientifically & socially-aware 
(relatively) modern America' at THIS PARTICULAR MOMENT within our 
particular-centric 'time-stream' was a guaranteed done-deal which is what 
allows your NARROW HISTORICALLY SEVERLY LIMITED PERSPECTIVE  to spout-off 
naively.

 

Our current l& argely 'fair' and relatively open-minded 'world/environment' is 
actually FAR more PROSCRIBED by behind the scenes forces than we care to admit. 
. . and if 'those behind the scenes information constrainers/surpressors' want 
any current 'EINSTEIN'  &/or R&D to be suppressed/constrained/silenced; then 
trust me. . . he/they/it WILL be SUPPRESSED.   Justice & Freedom of Thought & 
Expression is NEVER AN EASY ROAD. . . and NEVER guarantee'd, sponsorship, 
and/or meritorious recognition &/or subsequent worthy R&D funding.  I think 
that you really know this, but just temporarilly 'misplaced' the notion in 
light of your own momentary dissappointing setbacks.

 

What a champion you are. . . however; as a 'historian,'  your paint is 'still' 
wet. . .

 

QUOTE:  "Quit yer Whinning & looking for Scapegoats to vent on." 
(Me)~Cheers-JHO-

 

Plea

RE: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-08 Thread Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan
s and stopped (quasi-heroically) the holocaust in it's tracks.  
The Manhattan project might have then been suspended. . . .   It ALMOST 
happened.
 
Add to this that in those days in America that the PRO-GERMAN 'America-First' 
movement a la' Lindberg was IMMENSELY POPULAR in the United States.  A few 
short years before that the MILLION-MAN-MARCH in D.C. was all wearing 
WHITE-SHEETS and the American Public was largely FOR THEM.  The 
Hitler-Holocaust largely gutted those trends, but that was hardly guaranteed 
had Rommel for instance set the Jewish prison-camps free and sponsored the 
Zionist Establishment of Israel instead of later in 1948.
 
FORGOTTON HISTORY:  England was 'before Germany-crimes' was MONSTROUSLY GUILTY 
of machine-gunning Jews on decks of Zionist-ships to Palestine and often 
'sinking' those refugee ships full of Jews.  FACT:  Menachim Begin's 
HAGANAH/MOSSAD was created to FIGHT THE BRITISH brutal anti-Semitic Pogrom 
against establishment of the STATE of ISRAEL.  When the 3rd-Reich's initial 
anti-Semitic campaign/Crystal-Nacht etc. FIRST SOLUTION was simply to ship the 
German-Jewish Population to 'exile' in Palestine.  BUT British backed/sponsored 
Mufti-Husseini/Wahabi-Prince of Jerusalem was 'counciled' to MAKE A PACT WITH 
THE WAFFEN-SS to become FIELD MARSHALL OF THE ARAB LEGION who with HIMMLER 
DESIGNED the DEATH-CAMP-JEWISH-EXTERMINATION SYSTEM while the BRITISH SENT THE 
JEWISH REFUGEES-->BACK TO GERMANY!
 
Oh yes:  History could easily bounced another direction and from those 'insane' 
days VERY NEARLY DID!
 
Current Britain would VERY MUCH rather be giving credit for quasi-RELATIVITY 
etc. to the LUCASIAN-CHAIR etc. 'rather' than crediting Eintein if they 
possibly could have swung it as well. . . .but the 'BOMB' changed all that. . . 
.
 
In short:  Einstein's popularity & support in the largely anti-semitic United 
States & Britain of those days would have been 'tenuous' at best had events 
even 'slightly'  been altered and the Hitler-3rd Reich been villified as a 
relative 'small cadre' of villains while a 'Heroic Rommel' duely 'hung them 
all' and somewhat 'redeemed' the German War effort as an 
ANTI-BOLSHEVIC/ANTI-COMMUNIST eventual ally of the west.  Subsequently> No East 
Germany/No Berlin Wall etc. . . .
 
Consider alternate events track:>NO BOMB---Pinko Einstein--->Massive Propaganda 
blaming Jewish Marx-Lenin-Trotsky-Stalin etc.(NOW HAPPENING IN RUSSIA)--a la' 
past>-->(Stalin-Holocaust=50 Million-plus slaughter of Russians)>NO 1948 
American backing & Establishment of the State of Israel under a PRO-America 
First/Pro Rommelesque Germany)>and in THAT WORLD-->Semitic-Pinko Albert 
Einstein is NOT lionized, nor sponsored, nor given credit for even an EVENTUAL 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of 'Relativity-E=MC^2.'  UPSHOT:  Some other PC-Acceptable 
personage such as Zsilard or Boehr or Planck would have been given the credit 
for Eintein's brain-child.
 
Albert Einstein's notoriety & success were dependent upon a huge convergence of 
fortuitous events.  Lucky for us that they did converge.
 
YOU who JUST CAN'T seem to get peer-recognition which generates the 
LAY-PUBLIC-ACKNOWLEDGEMENT to get LENR-CANR  --'funded!'---> don't get 
it, that even OUR/YOUR even knowing WHO EINSTEIN IS dependent entirely on the 
same type of convergence of factors that is so far NOT HAPPENING FOR YOU. . .  
"What a concept!"
 
Is success/notoriety fair or just or inevitable?  Just & fair are IRRELEVANT to 
the currents of history.  And how many quasi-dimensions of the above 
'alternative histories' have/are happening?  Some think that they 'all' are 
fact--->somewhere/somewhen. . . Is this a 'credible' notion?
 
HISTORICAL FACT Synthesis is a 'science' in which I posit that 'you' are 
severely deficient.  You think that this 'scientifically & socially-aware 
(relatively) modern America' at THIS PARTICULAR MOMENT within our 
particular-centric 'time-stream' was a guaranteed done-deal which is what 
allows your NARROW HISTORICALLY SEVERLY LIMITED PERSPECTIVE  to spout-off 
naively.
 
Our current l& argely 'fair' and relatively open-minded 'world/environment' is 
actually FAR more PROSCRIBED by behind the scenes forces than we care to admit. 
. . and if 'those behind the scenes information constrainers/surpressors' want 
any current 'EINSTEIN'  &/or R&D to be suppressed/constrained/silenced; then 
trust me. . . he/they/it WILL be SUPPRESSED.   Justice & Freedom of Thought & 
Expression is NEVER AN EASY ROAD. . . and NEVER guarantee'd, sponsorship, 
and/or meritorious reco

Re: [Vo]:AIP abruptly cancels proceedings

2010-10-14 Thread fznidarsic


Go to Hulu and watch the Six steps to Avert the Collapse of Civilization.
by Davd Eagleman.

what is the cause of collapse.

1.  Running of of energy
2.  The censor of information (in our case by the science police)

enjoy

Frank Znidarsic