Re: wicket-examples test broken again
* Eelco Hillenius: If I remember correctly, Jean-Baptiste made a fix yesterday that repaired the WordGeneratorTest from wicket-examples. After the package rename changes it is broken again it seems. Rolling back to the older version doesn't seem to fix it unfortunately. Any idea Jean-Baptiste or Johan? No, that's not me ;-) Frankly, I don't understand what's going on with the tests on Bamboo. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: wicket-examples test broken again
i did some fixes But what i also needed to do is remove the jasper.jar from my build path at the moment that one was in the build path and i would run the AllTest jetty doesn't start up because it tries to create a jasper jsp servlet. after removing that and 3 changes the examples do run at my place. johan On 4/11/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Eelco Hillenius: If I remember correctly, Jean-Baptiste made a fix yesterday that repaired the WordGeneratorTest from wicket-examples. After the package rename changes it is broken again it seems. Rolling back to the older version doesn't seem to fix it unfortunately. Any idea Jean-Baptiste or Johan? No, that's not me ;-) Frankly, I don't understand what's going on with the tests on Bamboo. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: wicket-examples test broken again
ok the latest wicket examples do build now and is live: http://www.wicketstuff.org/wicket13/index.html compref should be a bit updated now because the page itself doesn't say that it is org.apache.wicket. components... and the pub example doesn't work i see, the image doesn't update. (caching?) johan On 4/11/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i did some fixes But what i also needed to do is remove the jasper.jar from my build path at the moment that one was in the build path and i would run the AllTest jetty doesn't start up because it tries to create a jasper jsp servlet. after removing that and 3 changes the examples do run at my place. johan On 4/11/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Eelco Hillenius: If I remember correctly, Jean-Baptiste made a fix yesterday that repaired the WordGeneratorTest from wicket-examples. After the package rename changes it is broken again it seems. Rolling back to the older version doesn't seem to fix it unfortunately. Any idea Jean-Baptiste or Johan? No, that's not me ;-) Frankly, I don't understand what's going on with the tests on Bamboo. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: wicket-examples FormPage
that bug has been fixed already http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I visited the FormPage on wicket-library.com and I'm not sure if its working correctly: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage The page is supposed to perform Ajax form validation. When I type data into the field(s), I observe an Ajax request being sent to the server. The response is returned to the client but there aren't any validation errors displayed on the page. Could this be a bug? I tested the page with MSIE 7.0 and Firefox 2.0 Sean
Re: wicket-examples FormPage
ah, how could i forget our new domain! :) http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that bug has been fixed already http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I visited the FormPage on wicket-library.com and I'm not sure if its working correctly: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage The page is supposed to perform Ajax form validation. When I type data into the field(s), I observe an Ajax request being sent to the server. The response is returned to the client but there aren't any validation errors displayed on the page. Could this be a bug? I tested the page with MSIE 7.0 and Firefox 2.0 Sean
Re: wicket-examples FormPage
Was this a bug in the FormPage class or a bug in the wicket-1.2.4.jar? (I am trying to implement the same type of functionality in my own web application) Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that bug has been fixed already http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I visited the FormPage on wicket-library.com and I'm not sure if its working correctly: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage The page is supposed to perform Ajax form validation. When I type data into the field(s), I observe an Ajax request being sent to the server. The response is returned to the client but there aren't any validation errors displayed on the page. Could this be a bug? I tested the page with MSIE 7.0 and Firefox 2.0 Sean
Re: wicket-examples FormPage
it was a bug with wicket and is fixed in 1.3. it had to do with components/page not properly attaching/detaching during ajax requests. -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was this a bug in the FormPage class or a bug in the wicket-1.2.4.jar? (I am trying to implement the same type of functionality in my own web application) Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that bug has been fixed already http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I visited the FormPage on wicket-library.com and I'm not sure if its working correctly: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage The page is supposed to perform Ajax form validation. When I type data into the field(s), I observe an Ajax request being sent to the server. The response is returned to the client but there aren't any validation errors displayed on the page. Could this be a bug? I tested the page with MSIE 7.0 and Firefox 2.0 Sean
Re: wicket-examples FormPage
Are you referring to WICKET-156? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-156 Is this fix going to be added to the Wicket 1.2.5 release? Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it was a bug with wicket and is fixed in 1.3. it had to do with components/page not properly attaching/detaching during ajax requests. -igor
Re: wicket-examples FormPage
yes thats the one and no, afaik it will not. if you want it you can start a vote to have it included. just keep in mind it is already very time consuming for us to work on 2 branches, not to mentioned 3 -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you referring to WICKET-156? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-156 Is this fix going to be added to the Wicket 1.2.5 release? Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it was a bug with wicket and is fixed in 1.3. it had to do with components/page not properly attaching/detaching during ajax requests. -igor
Re: wicket-examples FormPage
I understand that Wicket 1.2.x is in maintenance mode. However, Wicket 1.2.4is the only version that has been deemed a production-ready release. Should users continue using Wicket 1.2.4 or should they move to the unreleased Wicket 1.3 codebase? Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes thats the one and no, afaik it will not. if you want it you can start a vote to have it included. just keep in mind it is already very time consuming for us to work on 2 branches, not to mentioned 3 -igor
Re: wicket-examples FormPage
On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand that Wicket 1.2.x is in maintenance mode. However, Wicket 1.2.4is the only version that has been deemed a production-ready release. really? i thought 1.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3 were also production ready...? Should users continue using Wicket 1.2.4 or should they move to the unreleased Wicket 1.3 codebase? if you _can_ upgrade then please do, there are some api breaks through. if not, then like i said, start the vote. -igor Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes thats the one and no, afaik it will not. if you want it you can start a vote to have it included. just keep in mind it is already very time consuming for us to work on 2 branches, not to mentioned 3 -igor
Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com
It only gets restartet once a day. Thats usually it. It is not available 100% that is true, but it is down only very few times. If anyone wants to spend some time on investigating why it is done, I'm more than happy to grant you access. Unfortunately I have only very little time right now. It is a standard tomcat installation provided by hoster for free. Juergen On 1/18/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we do need a domain for our dedicated box, using ip addr sucks -igor On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Problem is that wicketframework.org points currently to sf.net, and I can't add subdomains without breaking the current wicketframework.org site. Perhaps we should also host wicketframework.org on that box, and redirect traffic from sf.net site to our own box. Then this is possible. Please note that wicketframework.org will probably cease to exist when we reach tlp status @apache. http://wicket.apache.org sounds good IMO. Perhaps the mentors could shine more light on the status of wicketframework.org after graduation? Martijn On 1/18/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And perhaps get some subdomains for build.wicketframework.org = http://81.17.46.170/bamboo examples.wicketframework.org/1.2 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket12/ examples.wicketframework.org/1.3 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ and so on. Frank On 1/18/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Martijn Dashorst: Why not download the examples yourself and run it locally? A better answer would be to take off the link to wicket-library.com, as it's not the first time that is it offline. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com
lets see how stable our server is. It runs much more apps so it should go down earlier! johan On 1/19/07, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It only gets restartet once a day. Thats usually it. It is not available 100% that is true, but it is down only very few times. If anyone wants to spend some time on investigating why it is done, I'm more than happy to grant you access. Unfortunately I have only very little time right now. It is a standard tomcat installation provided by hoster for free. Juergen On 1/18/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we do need a domain for our dedicated box, using ip addr sucks -igor On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Problem is that wicketframework.org points currently to sf.net, and I can't add subdomains without breaking the current wicketframework.org site. Perhaps we should also host wicketframework.org on that box, and redirect traffic from sf.net site to our own box. Then this is possible. Please note that wicketframework.org will probably cease to exist when we reach tlp status @apache. http://wicket.apache.org sounds good IMO. Perhaps the mentors could shine more light on the status of wicketframework.org after graduation? Martijn On 1/18/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And perhaps get some subdomains for build.wicketframework.org = http://81.17.46.170/bamboo examples.wicketframework.org/1.2 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket12/ examples.wicketframework.org/1.3 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ and so on. Frank On 1/18/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Martijn Dashorst: Why not download the examples yourself and run it locally? A better answer would be to take off the link to wicket-library.com, as it's not the first time that is it offline. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com
http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ -igor On 1/18/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the wicket-library web site offline? I am unable to view any of the examples: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/upload I was planning to demo Wicket's component set to my co-workers this morning... Sean
Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com
And perhaps get some subdomains for build.wicketframework.org = http://81.17.46.170/bamboo examples.wicketframework.org/1.2 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket12/ examples.wicketframework.org/1.3 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ and so on. Frank On 1/18/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Martijn Dashorst: Why not download the examples yourself and run it locally? A better answer would be to take off the link to wicket-library.com, as it's not the first time that is it offline. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com
Problem is that wicketframework.org points currently to sf.net, and I can't add subdomains without breaking the current wicketframework.org site. Perhaps we should also host wicketframework.org on that box, and redirect traffic from sf.net site to our own box. Then this is possible. Please note that wicketframework.org will probably cease to exist when we reach tlp status @apache. http://wicket.apache.org sounds good IMO. Perhaps the mentors could shine more light on the status of wicketframework.org after graduation? Martijn On 1/18/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And perhaps get some subdomains for build.wicketframework.org = http://81.17.46.170/bamboo examples.wicketframework.org/1.2 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket12/ examples.wicketframework.org/1.3 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ and so on. Frank On 1/18/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Martijn Dashorst: Why not download the examples yourself and run it locally? A better answer would be to take off the link to wicket-library.com, as it's not the first time that is it offline. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com
we do need a domain for our dedicated box, using ip addr sucks -igor On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Problem is that wicketframework.org points currently to sf.net, and I can't add subdomains without breaking the current wicketframework.org site. Perhaps we should also host wicketframework.org on that box, and redirect traffic from sf.net site to our own box. Then this is possible. Please note that wicketframework.org will probably cease to exist when we reach tlp status @apache. http://wicket.apache.org sounds good IMO. Perhaps the mentors could shine more light on the status of wicketframework.org after graduation? Martijn On 1/18/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And perhaps get some subdomains for build.wicketframework.org = http://81.17.46.170/bamboo examples.wicketframework.org/1.2 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket12/ examples.wicketframework.org/1.3 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ and so on. Frank On 1/18/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Martijn Dashorst: Why not download the examples yourself and run it locally? A better answer would be to take off the link to wicket-library.com, as it's not the first time that is it offline. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: wicket-examples compilation failure
thx fix it.
strange that compilers are that different. should be a setting then
somewhere in eclipse.
johan
On 12/18/06, Martin Benda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
wicket-examples 2.0 (trunk) module fails to compile using maven and
standard
javac compiler (however, eclipse compiler doesn't complain):
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
/home/bendis/work/accord/wicket/svn/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/wicket/examples/repeater/FormPage.java:[91,25]
method does not override a method from its superclass
A patch to fix this error:
=
--- src/main/java/wicket/examples/repeater/FormPage.java(revision
488141)
+++ src/main/java/wicket/examples/repeater/FormPage.java(working
copy)
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
}
@Override
- protected ItemContact newItem(MarkupContainer
parent, String id, int index,
+ protected ItemContact newItem(MarkupContainer?
parent, String id, int index,
IModelContact model)
{
// this item sets markup class attribute
to either 'odd' or
=
Regards,
Bendis
Re: wicket-examples compilation failure
Yes, the Eclipse and Sun compiler differ quite annoyingly in how they treat casts that have a generic component. Unfortunately this is not a setting. There are more differences. For example JRockit behaves weird around warnings for deprecated methods. Regards, Erik. Johan Compagner wrote: thx fix it. strange that compilers are that different. should be a setting then somewhere in eclipse. johan -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
Re: wicket-examples compilation failure
Hi!
This is strange - I don't get any compilation error in the wicket module,
nor do I see any error in WebPage.java:169 or Loop.java:167:
WebPage:
public final HeaderContainer getHeaderContainer()
{
return (HeaderContainer)get(HtmlHeaderSectionHandler.HEADER_ID);
}
Loop:
// Get item for iteration
final LoopItem item = (LoopItem)get(Integer.toString(iteration));
Do you have an up-to-date wicket trunk snapshot? What version of jdk do
you use?
Regards,
Bendis
PS: I'm using sun javac 1.5.0_08
Dne pondělí 18 prosinec 2006 14:15 Filippo Diotalevi napsal(a):
On 12/18/06, Martin Benda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
wicket-examples 2.0 (trunk) module fails to compile using maven and
standard javac compiler (however, eclipse compiler doesn't complain):
Hello, the very same error is present in the main wicket module (in
the trunk), so it is impossible to build it with standard Sun's
compiler:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
/trunk/wicket/src/main/java/wicket/markup/html/WebPage.java:[169,43]
inconvertible types
found : wicket.Componentcapture of ?
required: wicket.markup.html.internal.HeaderContainer
/trunk/wicket/src/main/java/wicket/markup/html/list/Loop.java:[167,67]
inconvertible types
found : wicket.Componentcapture of ?
required: wicket.markup.html.list.Loop.LoopItem
Re: wicket-examples compilation failure
On 12/18/06, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agh! Two typos! I mean Java 1.5.0_10. Yes... I had 1.5.0_06, and it didn't work; now I'm using the latest release (1.5.0_10-b3) and it's building correctly. Thanks everybody -- filippo
Re: wicket-examples
On 11/13/06, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: src/test/java/com/meterware/httpunit (doesn't seem to be used, no license header at all) This was a fix for XML and/or JavaScript not being parsed correctly, iirc. The httpunit license is MIT or BSD type: http://httpunit.sourceforge.net/doc/license.html src/test/java/nl/openedge/util/jetty (some files has a non-ASL license header which I haven't looked through yet, and some has a short copyright notice in Dutch) This one can be changed by either me or Eelco. Eelco was the original author I believe. It is not that much magic that is going on there, easily retrofitted for ASL imo. I'm not a lawyer, but if Eelco modifies the package name from nl.openedge to org.apache.wicket, and fixes the header it should be ok. Martijn -- a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket;Vote/a for a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket;Wicket/a at the a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/;Best Stuff in the World!/a
Re: wicket-examples
What about a file like this: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/test/java/nl/openedge/util/jetty/JettyMonitorException.java?view=co Case of a stupid slip. I'll testify that in front of a jury :) Eelco
Re: wicket-examples
On 11/13/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about a file like this: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/test/java/nl/openedge/util/jetty/JettyMonitorException.java?view=co Case of a stupid slip. I'll testify that in front of a jury :) Hehe, does it say All rights reserved? But anyway are you willing/have enough rights to change the license to ASL? Else I will add them to NOTICE.txt Frank
Re: Re: wicket-examples
On 11/13/06, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But anyway are you willing/have enough rights to change the license to ASL? Else I will add them to NOTICE.txt He's the original author, regardless of the quality :-). Move the code to the wicket namespace, and change to ASL. Or let Eelco do so (with a critical eye) to be on the safe side. Another option would be to flag it for removal/replacement. I have no special attachment to these files, other than that they help run our tests. With selenium-rc I think we can improve on our tests for extensions though. Martijn -- a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket;Vote/a for a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket;Wicket/a at the a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/;Best Stuff in the World!/a
