Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

2010-04-14 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
Right on schedule, its time for the 802.11 vs Canopy crusades.

If you deploy it right, you should be able to get about 40-50 subs on 
802.11 based APs.   If your application is going to require higher 
density than that, go with Canopy, as you can probably get 120-150 per 
AP before they max out.If you intend to deploy symmetrical speeds, 
you should probably deploy Canopy.

10mhz channel sizes seem to make a big difference on 802.11, as you can 
then put up more sectors and the throughput doesn't diminish that much 
with the half-size channels.   I wouldn't put up Ubiquiti or Tranzeo 
APs, I would definitely go with StarOS or Mikrotik for the APs to get 
the added functionality that they offer.   I have several thousand subs 
deployed on my network and on networks that I designed handling VOIP and 
just about any other application needed by the end users just fine - all 
with 802.11 based gear.   A special thanks to the Canopy guys out there 
who have been selling me their used Tranzeo CPEs - your old radios are 
alive and well on my network.   Win-Win.

If you are going to scale to huge numbers per AP, you will need to be 
just as concerned with obtaining high-capacity backhaul than PtMP 
performance.   The 802.11 based backhauls are cheap and ubiquitous and 
do pretty good up to about 20meg, but they are about done at that 
point.   Drop the extra coin and get licensed backhauls.

Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com

On 4/13/2010 8:06 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
 This is what I am in the process of doing now.  We have another 200 subs
 to be converted next month.  Then another 100 subs after that.  Not only
 is it a multiple truck roll incident, but I already paid for the
 MikroTik gear...and now am replacing customer equipment with Canopy.
 ROI just got extended an additional 6 months.  We just replaced a
 complete Trango 900 AP with Canopy 900.  Performance is just better and
 it scales.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:24 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

 Hi,

 Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
 infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low and
 consistent (less than 10ms). With UBNT, you can build a system much
 cheaper, and one that will probably work in a small, rural area.
 However, it does not scale.

 So, the question you have to ask is: Will your network ever grow to the
 size that you run out of channels? On a single tower, there are roughly
 six legal channels in the 5.8ghz band (using 20mhz channel size). None
 of the other channels are legal with UBNT gear. So you have 6 channels
 to use for your entire network, and you can't co-locate near adjacent
 channels, and you can't have two AP's on different towers facing each
 other on the same channel.

 The problem we made on our network was trying to use Mikrotik for PtMP
 deployments and discovering that it doesn't scale. We ended up having to
 go to every customer we had installed on two big towers and change them
 out to Canopy. So we had to roll a truck twice. :(

 Travis
 Microserv


 Glenn Kelley wrote:

 In trying to make the right buying decision - some simple answers may
 help.



 1.  What is the meantime failure rate for your ubiquity equipment

 2.  What is the avg amount of truck rolls per week you run to fix an
 issue vs the # of customers you have?
 ie- if you have say 1500 clients and do 8 troubleshooting calls a week
  

 then it would be 1500/8 = .0053% )

 3.  how often does a tech call come in (w/o a truck roll) that is
 equipment related...  For some reason I think some of the ubiquity
 radios just need a power cycle and voila - they behave much better...
 so - what is the average # of calls per total clients that come in
 that are fixed w/ simple methods vs a truck roll for the ubiquity
 users ...



 Moto Users - do you have this info as well:

 Reason I ask is because I am wondering - if the cost of Moto is
 actually worth it...  as a smaller operator - this information would
 be most beneficial for sure.

 Buying a Moto radio - even if 2 or 3 times the $$ if - the service
 calls on the back side are much less - might be worth it.

 Perhaps the cost of Radio vs People (both in manpower as well as
 client satisfaction for uptime) make the buying decision much
 easier...  but having some numbers to go along with this would be
  
 great.


 Thanks




  
 
 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

  
 
 


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] When to route?

2010-04-14 Thread Jeromie Reeves
Depends on how you build it. The backhauls are bridged, but there is
routing between key backhaul points (I make triangles)

Every tool has its place and used right, works well.

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists
li...@manageisp.com wrote:
 When to route?   From the very start!!!

 If you take the time to learn the basics of OSPF, implement NAT and/or
 use private IPs for the links between systems and use a logical design
 for your subnets it is relatively easy to route.   Understanding the
 basics of OSPF is really key, because static routing gets too
 complicated after the first few nodes and OSPF will handle it all much
 easier.   OSPF also makes it possible to build automatic failover into
 the network.   I have several rings in my network that automatically
 re-route in different directions when there are outages and I can easily
 set preference for traffic to flow in different directions based on
 backhaul capacity, latency and other factors.

 Bridging is a disaster waiting to happen.   Every day that you run a
 bridged network is a day closer to the eventual disaster.

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com


 On 4/13/2010 11:37 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
 Yes if you route at the CPE then the backhauls can bridge and your
 (mostly) good (this is how i do it)
 What you need to worry about here is clients who plug in their routers
 backwards and things like that.
 It helps if you do not have client routers (routing/dhcp in the CPE,
 switch inside)


 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Mark Dueckm...@netking.bz  wrote:

 Question: If you have all client computers behind a router, then you are
 mostly protected from broadcasting and the need for routing is not that
 high, right?

 I have a small network and I'm starting to do some routing between
 longer backhaul links, and between cities. So far, I don't know if I've
 seen a difference yet.

 On 04/13/2010 10:08 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:

 We're up to about 400 subs on one half of the network.  We're about to 
 start
 routing.  We'll know in a few months if it helps or not.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Ihnenos10ru...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 9:02 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] When to route?




 OK, I know: friends don't let friends bridge networks. But at what if
 the networks are small?

 The reason I ask is I'm wondering if I'd have anything to gain by setting
 up static routing (now that the new UBNT beta added this to the gui).

 What I have is a satellite internet modem going to an MT box. The MT box
 is wired to an 802.11g AP/wired switch (which has wireless clients). Also
 wired to that switch are two backhauls with clients at the far ends. One
 backhaul is a pair of PS2's (the one closest to the switch is WDS Station
 and the far end is WDS AP with clients). The other backhaul is a pair of
 NS5M's running Airmax (obviously no clients) and wired to the far NS5M is
 a Bullet 2M running as 802.11b/g/n AP with clients. All the hardware is in
 the 192.168.7.x/24 range as are most of the clients, though I give some
 clients addresses in the 192.168.0.x/24 range to keep them isolated from
 the hardware and other clients. The MT box doesn't allow traffic between
 the 192.168.7.x and the 192.168.0.x net.


                                                               
 ---PS2~~~PS2
 with clients (192.168.0.x)
                                                             /
 Sat modem---MT box---switch/ap with clients 192.168.7.x
                                                             \
                                                               
 NS5M~NS5MBullet2M
 with clients 192.168.7.x


 I'm assuming now traffic for all clients transit all segments of the
 network i.e. traffic for a client wirelessly connected to the Bullet2M is
 also transiting the segment of the network comprised of the PS2's. Is that
 right or does the gear (in this case the switch joining the different
 segments of the network learn who's where and route the traffic
 accordingly? I'm assuming not. So if I made it so the clients on each AP
 were in a different subnet and static routed then traffic would only
 travel the pertinent network segment?

 Greg


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

2010-04-14 Thread Jon Auer
On that note, I have a few questions.
On those 40-50 802.11 subs, what kind of bandwidth are the users
seeing/are you selling them?

Do you count a polling MAC on a 802.11 chipset, say Ubiquiti AirMax,
in with 802.11?

My assumption would be that with a polling MAC on 802.11 chips you
should see nearly the number of subs of Canopy minus the frequency
reuse you get with GPS sync. Would you say that is accurate?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists
li...@manageisp.com wrote:
 Right on schedule, its time for the 802.11 vs Canopy crusades.

 If you deploy it right, you should be able to get about 40-50 subs on
 802.11 based APs.   If your application is going to require higher
 density than that, go with Canopy, as you can probably get 120-150 per
 AP before they max out.    If you intend to deploy symmetrical speeds,
 you should probably deploy Canopy.

 10mhz channel sizes seem to make a big difference on 802.11, as you can
 then put up more sectors and the throughput doesn't diminish that much
 with the half-size channels.   I wouldn't put up Ubiquiti or Tranzeo
 APs, I would definitely go with StarOS or Mikrotik for the APs to get
 the added functionality that they offer.   I have several thousand subs
 deployed on my network and on networks that I designed handling VOIP and
 just about any other application needed by the end users just fine - all
 with 802.11 based gear.   A special thanks to the Canopy guys out there
 who have been selling me their used Tranzeo CPEs - your old radios are
 alive and well on my network.   Win-Win.

 If you are going to scale to huge numbers per AP, you will need to be
 just as concerned with obtaining high-capacity backhaul than PtMP
 performance.   The 802.11 based backhauls are cheap and ubiquitous and
 do pretty good up to about 20meg, but they are about done at that
 point.   Drop the extra coin and get licensed backhauls.

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com

 On 4/13/2010 8:06 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
 This is what I am in the process of doing now.  We have another 200 subs
 to be converted next month.  Then another 100 subs after that.  Not only
 is it a multiple truck roll incident, but I already paid for the
 MikroTik gear...and now am replacing customer equipment with Canopy.
 ROI just got extended an additional 6 months.  We just replaced a
 complete Trango 900 AP with Canopy 900.  Performance is just better and
 it scales.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:24 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

 Hi,

 Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
 infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low and
 consistent (less than 10ms). With UBNT, you can build a system much
 cheaper, and one that will probably work in a small, rural area.
 However, it does not scale.

 So, the question you have to ask is: Will your network ever grow to the
 size that you run out of channels? On a single tower, there are roughly
 six legal channels in the 5.8ghz band (using 20mhz channel size). None
 of the other channels are legal with UBNT gear. So you have 6 channels
 to use for your entire network, and you can't co-locate near adjacent
 channels, and you can't have two AP's on different towers facing each
 other on the same channel.

 The problem we made on our network was trying to use Mikrotik for PtMP
 deployments and discovering that it doesn't scale. We ended up having to
 go to every customer we had installed on two big towers and change them
 out to Canopy. So we had to roll a truck twice. :(

 Travis
 Microserv


 Glenn Kelley wrote:

 In trying to make the right buying decision - some simple answers may
 help.



 1.  What is the meantime failure rate for your ubiquity equipment

 2.  What is the avg amount of truck rolls per week you run to fix an
 issue vs the # of customers you have?
 ie- if you have say 1500 clients and do 8 troubleshooting calls a week


 then it would be 1500/8 = .0053% )

 3.  how often does a tech call come in (w/o a truck roll) that is
 equipment related...  For some reason I think some of the ubiquity
 radios just need a power cycle and voila - they behave much better...
 so - what is the average # of calls per total clients that come in
 that are fixed w/ simple methods vs a truck roll for the ubiquity
 users ...



 Moto Users - do you have this info as well:

 Reason I ask is because I am wondering - if the cost of Moto is
 actually worth it...  as a smaller operator - this information would
 be most beneficial for sure.

 Buying a Moto radio - even if 2 or 3 times the $$ if - the service
 calls on the back side are much less - might be worth it.

 Perhaps the cost of Radio vs People (both in manpower as well as
 client satisfaction for 

Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Jeromie Reeves
My soon to be 4 and 7 yo boys have iMacs. They are locked down and
just do not know about that stuff yet. I removed
access to the web browser in the PSP cause the oldest found it. He
does not know how to use it (or so I think). The best
parents can do these days is be very proactive which you seam to be
trying to do. I do not know the legalities of monitoring
a kids device, i leave that up to parents and their lawyers. There are
key loggers for pretty much everything out there, VPN's
to make sure the data comes back to you first, and so on. Talk to your
lawyer. If your child has access to these services from
another location then I would assume access from there will or has
been used. Find out if so and who owns it, you might be
able to access much of that history from there. Also the great way
back machine and google cache can often have copies of
peoples pages. Talk with your lawyer. If I came to you and said your
site had given access to my minor, how would your advisers
tell you to respond? Likely to fluff me off as fast as possible to
avoid any liability. It could take a simple request from a letter
head to get them moving on it, or possibly real threat of legal
action. Did I mention, talk to your lawyer. S/He will be the best
source of information for correct surveilla^R^R parenting of digital children.


On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted
 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over
 18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Frank Crawford
Speak firmly and borrow that big stick from Roosevelt when necessary. 
Fear of God is useless but Fear of Dad is profound. I raised 5 kids, 
youngest is 32, still works, no stick necessary, they just know where i 
keep it.

Frank

Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email 
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace, 
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can 
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might 
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the 
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email 
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally 
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been 
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got 
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know 
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and 
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted 
 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had 
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden 
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However 
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO 
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over 
 18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account 
 information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these 
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison

2010-04-14 Thread can...@believewireless.net
Upgraded the AP and all CPE to Beta 5 this morning and latency still
sucks.  Signal is a -57 on one side and -59 on the other.  Every one
of our VoIP customers on this tower is complaining.
attachment: graph_image.php.png


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Steve Barnes
Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and such.  
There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and locks down a 
PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows vista and Win7 
to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of them protect Zunes, 
iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and install that on your 
home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There are ways you can bypass 
this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you are on this list, I expect your 
son knows his way around network settings.  As the old sayings go where there 
is a will there is a way. 

I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my 
clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hi All,

Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email 
addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace, 
facebook etc. sites.

If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can 
delete things from.

I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might 
bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the 
stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email 
address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally 
found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been 
saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got 
the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know 
that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and 
work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted 
information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had 
no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden 
from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However 
they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO 
proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over 
18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account 
information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these 
days?

thanks
marlon




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

2010-04-14 Thread Brian Webster
To All;

My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list of the
states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer
addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping
track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward that
directly to the NTIA. We now have a person I can contact directly to express
our concerns with this process as necessary. The NTIA has weekly conference
calls with the states so there are opportunities to help this process along.

 



Thank You,

Brian Webster

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread St. Louis Broadband
Hey marlon,
Sigh...mine is finally 18!
However, I totally understand the situation and had to cope with it myself.
I employed a key logger.

~V~

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hi All,

Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email 
addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace, 
facebook etc. sites.

If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can 
delete things from.

I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might 
bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the 
stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email 
address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally 
found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been 
saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got

the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know 
that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and

work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted

information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had 
no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden 
from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However 
they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO 
proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over

18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account 
information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these 
days?

thanks
marlon





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Jeff Broadwick
We use Bluecoat K9 and are very happy with it so far.

My 14 and 13 year olds have Facebook accounts...under the condition that my
wife and I are friended and have their passwords so that we can log in as
them at any time.

I found out that my son had a Google mail account a while back that he did
not ask us for.  We killed it.

We have one home computer.  It is a laptop and it stays in the main living
areas.

So far, I'm way ahead of the kids on technology and they know it.  They
believe that we can track anything they can do (and we can...to a point).
We check up enough so that they know we are watching.

I don't think that there is a perfect solution.  If the kids are bound and
determined to get to something they will do it.  

I tell kids that, before they hit send, they should think about what their
post/text/email would look like on the front page of the NY Times (back when
people read it!) above the fold.  I've seen posts from my kids friend's on
Facebook that make me cringe.   


Regards,

Jeff


Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and
such.  There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and locks
down a PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows
vista and Win7 to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of
them protect Zunes, iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and
install that on your home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There
are ways you can bypass this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you are
on this list, I expect your son knows his way around network settings.  As
the old sayings go where there is a will there is a way. 

I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my
clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hi All,

Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
facebook etc. sites.

If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
delete things from.

I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might
bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been
saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got
the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know
that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and
work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted
information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over
18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these
days?

thanks
marlon





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Steve Barnes
Forgot to mention (like Victoria said) KeyLogger best I've found 
http://www.covenanteyes.com/ but it's not free. It can be put on a PC and the 
user never knows that its on there you just get an email as to what that pc 
did.  Still wont stop the Zune.


Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and such.  
There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and locks down a 
PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows vista and Win7 
to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of them protect Zunes, 
iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and install that on your 
home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There are ways you can bypass 
this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you are on this list, I expect your 
son knows his way around network settings.  As the old sayings go where there 
is a will there is a way. 

I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my 
clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hi All,

Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email 
addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace, 
facebook etc. sites.

If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can 
delete things from.

I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might 
bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the 
stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email 
address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally 
found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been 
saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got 
the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know 
that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and 
work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted 
information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had 
no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden 
from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However 
they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO 
proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over 
18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account 
information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these 
days?

thanks
marlon




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
I tried to help a customer get Yahoo to delete her email account and it took
us almost an entire year to get some action.  No, they wouldn't delete it,
they would only LOCK it.  And that, sadly enough, took a letter from her
attorney.

As I've heard many times, there is no delete button on the internet.

Bob-


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of St. Louis Broadband
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:44 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hey marlon,
Sigh...mine is finally 18!
However, I totally understand the situation and had to cope with it myself.
I employed a key logger.

~V~

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hi All,

Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email 
addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace, 
facebook etc. sites.

If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can 
delete things from.

I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might 
bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the 
stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email 
address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally 
found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been 
saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got

the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know 
that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and

work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted

information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had 
no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden 
from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However 
they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO 
proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over

18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account 
information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these 
days?

thanks
marlon





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

2010-04-14 Thread Charles Hooper
Hello,

I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer. 
My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage in that 
area already. I don't have any towers in the area (or any at all) so my 
thoughts are that I would have to talk some local building owners into 
letting me put some small antennas on their roof. Do you have any tips 
for negotiating these kinds of deals?

Alternatively, I've seen a few people mention using satellite Internet; 
I'm wondering who you all use? I've been planning on needing 5Mbps 
connectivity. Are there other alternatives for what I'm trying to do?

Thanks in advance,
Charles



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Jeremie Chism
I have also used opendns for personal home use and for a corporate  
customer that wanted control over their Internet. It is solid and does  
what you need it to do.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 14, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:

 Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis,  
 and such.  There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely  
 free and locks down a PC's browsing. Then you can use user account  
 controls in windows vista and Win7 to keep them from over-ridding  
 your settings.  But none of them protect Zunes, iPad, PSP's.  You  
 will need a account with OpenDNS and install that on your home  
 routers DNS config to make it work right.  There are ways you can  
 bypass this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you are on this  
 list, I expect your son knows his way around network settings.  As  
 the old sayings go where there is a will there is a way.

 I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option  
 for my clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
 On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
 Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having  
 email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I*  
 can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet  
 that might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually  
 forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I  
 finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what  
 he'd been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between  
 when I got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I  
 didn't know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the  
 net and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the  
 deleted
 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that  
 he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being  
 hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email  
 address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.   
 However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They  
 had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child  
 was over
 18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your  
 kids these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

2010-04-14 Thread Rick Harnish
Brian,

 

I am aware of the following:

 

. Ohio  Contact:  ConnectOhio  Sweet, Dave [dsw...@connectohio.org]

. Michigan  Contact:  ConnectMichigan Terry Holmes
[te...@tholmes.net]

. Oregon  Contact: Brian Scaffidi [brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]

. Pennsylvania  Contact: Diane Lizambri [dlizam...@deltaone.com]

. Florida  Contact:  ConnectFlorida

. Illinois  Contact:  ConnectIllinois

. Nebraska 

. Alaska  Contact:  ConnectAlaska

. Iowa  Contact:  ConnectIowa

. Kansas  Contact:  ConnectKansas

. Minnesota  Contact:  ConnectMinnesota

. Nevada  Contact:  ConnectNevada

. South Carolina  Contact:  ConnectSouthCarolina

. Tennessee  Contact:  ConnectedTennessee

. Texas  Contact:  ConnectedTexas

. Mississippi  Contact: Brian Scaffidi [brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]

. South Dakota  Contact: Brian Scaffidi
[brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]

. Montana   Contact:  Montana Department of Commerce

. Utah   Contact: Utah Public Service Commission (PSC)

. New Hampshire  Contact: University of New Hampshire (UNH)

 

There may be others active that I haven't heard of yet.  I'm sure other
people will chime in and hopefully fill in some contact names and email
addresses.

 

Thanks,

Rick Harnish

 

 -Original Message-

 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On

 Behalf Of Brian Webster

 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM

 To: 'WISPA General List'; memb...@wispa.org

 Subject: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

 

 To All;

 

 My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list

 of the

 states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer

 addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping

 track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward

 that

 directly to the NTIA. We now have a person I can contact directly to

 express

 our concerns with this process as necessary. The NTIA has weekly

 conference

 calls with the states so there are opportunities to help this process

 along.

 

 

 

 

 

 Thank You,

 

 Brian Webster

 

 

 

 

 

 ---

 -

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!

 http://signup.wispa.org/

 ---

 -

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 No virus found in this incoming message.

 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

 Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2809 - Release Date:

 04/13/10 20:22:00




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
YES!  I've told many, many people..  If you want to keep your kids safe,
no laptops, desktops that can't be lugged around and keep them all in a
central, common area in the home.  We have a computer repair business so we
see everything.  And I mean EVERYTHING!  What is the number one favorite
activity of 13, 14, 15+ year old girls who get that digital camera for their
birthday?  Hundreds of pictures of themselves in the mirror and some with
not much or nothing on.  Add that to the My Space pictures folder full of
penis shots sent to them.  I gave a laptop to a friend's daughter for
school.  What do I find?  This 15 year old girl had amassed hundreds of nude
pics of military men in Iraq and Afghanistan.  She had become some sort of
Pin Up girl for them, they were trading pics and chatting.  

Sigh...So she told the girl, at my suggestion, that I put
Mirror Track software on the laptop to send me logs of everything.  HA!
No more problems with that now, she probably moved her activities to another
machine someplace.  

Nothing you can do when they are motivated.



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:51 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

We use Bluecoat K9 and are very happy with it so far.

My 14 and 13 year olds have Facebook accounts...under the condition that my
wife and I are friended and have their passwords so that we can log in as
them at any time.

I found out that my son had a Google mail account a while back that he did
not ask us for.  We killed it.

We have one home computer.  It is a laptop and it stays in the main living
areas.

So far, I'm way ahead of the kids on technology and they know it.  They
believe that we can track anything they can do (and we can...to a point).
We check up enough so that they know we are watching.

I don't think that there is a perfect solution.  If the kids are bound and
determined to get to something they will do it.  

I tell kids that, before they hit send, they should think about what their
post/text/email would look like on the front page of the NY Times (back when
people read it!) above the fold.  I've seen posts from my kids friend's on
Facebook that make me cringe.   


Regards,

Jeff


Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and
such.  There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and locks
down a PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows
vista and Win7 to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of
them protect Zunes, iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and
install that on your home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There
are ways you can bypass this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you are
on this list, I expect your son knows his way around network settings.  As
the old sayings go where there is a will there is a way. 

I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my
clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hi All,

Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
facebook etc. sites.

If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
delete things from.

I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might
bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been
saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got
the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know
that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and
work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted
information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
no permission to use their site and I 

Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

2010-04-14 Thread Rick Harnish
Brian,

 

Correction, I do not know which ones have asked for customer addresses
specifically.

 

Sorry about the quick submit button.

 

Rick

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian,

 

I am aware of the following:

 

. Ohio  Contact:  ConnectOhio  Sweet, Dave [dsw...@connectohio.org]

. Michigan  Contact:  ConnectMichigan Terry Holmes
[te...@tholmes.net]

. Oregon  Contact: Brian Scaffidi [brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]

. Pennsylvania  Contact: Diane Lizambri [dlizam...@deltaone.com]

. Florida  Contact:  ConnectFlorida

. Illinois  Contact:  ConnectIllinois

. Nebraska 

. Alaska  Contact:  ConnectAlaska

. Iowa  Contact:  ConnectIowa

. Kansas  Contact:  ConnectKansas

. Minnesota  Contact:  ConnectMinnesota

. Nevada  Contact:  ConnectNevada

. South Carolina  Contact:  ConnectSouthCarolina

. Tennessee  Contact:  ConnectedTennessee

. Texas  Contact:  ConnectedTexas

. Mississippi  Contact: Brian Scaffidi [brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]

. South Dakota  Contact: Brian Scaffidi
[brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]

. Montana   Contact:  Montana Department of Commerce

. Utah   Contact: Utah Public Service Commission (PSC)

. New Hampshire  Contact: University of New Hampshire (UNH)

 

There may be others active that I haven't heard of yet.  I'm sure other
people will chime in and hopefully fill in some contact names and email
addresses.

 

Thanks,

Rick Harnish

 

 -Original Message-

 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On

 Behalf Of Brian Webster

 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM

 To: 'WISPA General List'; memb...@wispa.org

 Subject: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

 

 To All;

 

 My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list

 of the

 states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer

 addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping

 track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward

 that

 directly to the NTIA. We now have a person I can contact directly to

 express

 our concerns with this process as necessary. The NTIA has weekly

 conference

 calls with the states so there are opportunities to help this process

 along.

 

 

 

 

 

 Thank You,

 

 Brian Webster

 

 

 

 

 

 ---

 -

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!

 http://signup.wispa.org/

 ---

 -

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 No virus found in this incoming message.

 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

 Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2809 - Release Date:

 04/13/10 20:22:00




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison

2010-04-14 Thread Michael Baird
Have you posted this on the Ubiquiti forums? The developers will work 
with you to determine the issue you are seeing, will make the product 
better for all of us.

Regards
Michael Baird
 Upgraded the AP and all CPE to Beta 5 this morning and latency still
 sucks.  Signal is a -57 on one side and -59 on the other.  Every one
 of our VoIP customers on this tower is complaining.





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
Around here there are some kids with live linux on key drives they boot into
to keep things private.  Set your boot order to not have USB or CD in the
boot order and put an admin password on the bios.  

Bob-



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:54 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Forgot to mention (like Victoria said) KeyLogger best I've found
http://www.covenanteyes.com/ but it's not free. It can be put on a PC and
the user never knows that its on there you just get an email as to what that
pc did.  Still wont stop the Zune.


Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and
such.  There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and locks
down a PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows
vista and Win7 to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of
them protect Zunes, iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and
install that on your home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There
are ways you can bypass this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you are
on this list, I expect your son knows his way around network settings.  As
the old sayings go where there is a will there is a way. 

I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my
clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hi All,

Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email 
addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace, 
facebook etc. sites.

If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can 
delete things from.

I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might 
bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the 
stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email 
address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally 
found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been 
saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got

the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know 
that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and

work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted

information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had 
no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden 
from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However 
they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO 
proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over

18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account 
information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these 
days?

thanks
marlon





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
If it's a festival, the shop owners benefit from such a thing and there is
probably a committee that would do the footwork for you.  Talk to the
festival committee.  Shouldn't take much of anything to do what you're
trying to accomplish.

Bob-


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Hooper
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

Hello,

I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer. 
My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage in that 
area already. I don't have any towers in the area (or any at all) so my 
thoughts are that I would have to talk some local building owners into 
letting me put some small antennas on their roof. Do you have any tips 
for negotiating these kinds of deals?

Alternatively, I've seen a few people mention using satellite Internet; 
I'm wondering who you all use? I've been planning on needing 5Mbps 
connectivity. Are there other alternatives for what I'm trying to do?

Thanks in advance,
Charles




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
Here's one...

Dawn Clark, Project Coordinator
Connected Nation, Inc.
dcl...@connectednation.org 
Cell:   270.791.3308
Direct:  270.846.7622


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:00 AM
To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; 'WISPA General List'; motor...@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

Brian,

 

I am aware of the following:

 

. Ohio  Contact:  ConnectOhio  Sweet, Dave [dsw...@connectohio.org]

. Michigan  Contact:  ConnectMichigan Terry Holmes
[te...@tholmes.net]

. Oregon  Contact: Brian Scaffidi [brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]

. Pennsylvania  Contact: Diane Lizambri [dlizam...@deltaone.com]

. Florida  Contact:  ConnectFlorida

. Illinois  Contact:  ConnectIllinois

. Nebraska 

. Alaska  Contact:  ConnectAlaska

. Iowa  Contact:  ConnectIowa

. Kansas  Contact:  ConnectKansas

. Minnesota  Contact:  ConnectMinnesota

. Nevada  Contact:  ConnectNevada

. South Carolina  Contact:  ConnectSouthCarolina

. Tennessee  Contact:  ConnectedTennessee

. Texas  Contact:  ConnectedTexas

. Mississippi  Contact: Brian Scaffidi [brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]

. South Dakota  Contact: Brian Scaffidi
[brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]

. Montana   Contact:  Montana Department of Commerce

. Utah   Contact: Utah Public Service Commission (PSC)

. New Hampshire  Contact: University of New Hampshire (UNH)

 

There may be others active that I haven't heard of yet.  I'm sure other
people will chime in and hopefully fill in some contact names and email
addresses.

 

Thanks,

Rick Harnish

 

 -Original Message-

 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On

 Behalf Of Brian Webster

 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM

 To: 'WISPA General List'; memb...@wispa.org

 Subject: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

 

 To All;

 

 My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list

 of the

 states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer

 addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping

 track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward

 that

 directly to the NTIA. We now have a person I can contact directly to

 express

 our concerns with this process as necessary. The NTIA has weekly

 conference

 calls with the states so there are opportunities to help this process

 along.

 

 

 

 

 

 Thank You,

 

 Brian Webster

 

 

 

 

 

 ---

 -

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!

 http://signup.wispa.org/

 ---

 -

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 No virus found in this incoming message.

 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

 Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2809 - Release Date:

 04/13/10 20:22:00





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Philip Dorr
Those kids will then install Ubuntu using Wubi (if they have admin
rights), have the back-door bios passwords somewhere, or start
charring around a HDD and screwdriver.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
 Around here there are some kids with live linux on key drives they boot into
 to keep things private.  Set your boot order to not have USB or CD in the
 boot order and put an admin password on the bios.

 Bob-



 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:54 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Forgot to mention (like Victoria said) KeyLogger best I've found
 http://www.covenanteyes.com/ but it's not free. It can be put on a PC and
 the user never knows that its on there you just get an email as to what that
 pc did.  Still wont stop the Zune.


 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and
 such.  There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and locks
 down a PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows
 vista and Win7 to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of
 them protect Zunes, iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and
 install that on your home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There
 are ways you can bypass this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you are
 on this list, I expect your son knows his way around network settings.  As
 the old sayings go where there is a will there is a way.

 I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my
 clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
 Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got

 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and

 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted

 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over

 18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

2010-04-14 Thread Travis Johnson
No. It is impossible to get the same number of subs on a polling MAC 
(UBNT, Trango) as with Canopy. The reason is that Canopy does their 
scheduling in hardware, not software.

Mikrotik attempted to make their system handle more than 30 subs by 
improving the polling code, but they said it was as good as it could 
get. The CPU just can not handle enough interrupts to make the polling 
work with more than 30-40 subs. (I worked on this with them for over a 
year).

There is a reason Canopy does it in hardware.

Travis
Microserv

Jon Auer wrote:
 On that note, I have a few questions.
 On those 40-50 802.11 subs, what kind of bandwidth are the users
 seeing/are you selling them?

 Do you count a polling MAC on a 802.11 chipset, say Ubiquiti AirMax,
 in with 802.11?

 My assumption would be that with a polling MAC on 802.11 chips you
 should see nearly the number of subs of Canopy minus the frequency
 reuse you get with GPS sync. Would you say that is accurate?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists
 li...@manageisp.com wrote:
   
 Right on schedule, its time for the 802.11 vs Canopy crusades.

 If you deploy it right, you should be able to get about 40-50 subs on
 802.11 based APs.   If your application is going to require higher
 density than that, go with Canopy, as you can probably get 120-150 per
 AP before they max out.If you intend to deploy symmetrical speeds,
 you should probably deploy Canopy.

 10mhz channel sizes seem to make a big difference on 802.11, as you can
 then put up more sectors and the throughput doesn't diminish that much
 with the half-size channels.   I wouldn't put up Ubiquiti or Tranzeo
 APs, I would definitely go with StarOS or Mikrotik for the APs to get
 the added functionality that they offer.   I have several thousand subs
 deployed on my network and on networks that I designed handling VOIP and
 just about any other application needed by the end users just fine - all
 with 802.11 based gear.   A special thanks to the Canopy guys out there
 who have been selling me their used Tranzeo CPEs - your old radios are
 alive and well on my network.   Win-Win.

 If you are going to scale to huge numbers per AP, you will need to be
 just as concerned with obtaining high-capacity backhaul than PtMP
 performance.   The 802.11 based backhauls are cheap and ubiquitous and
 do pretty good up to about 20meg, but they are about done at that
 point.   Drop the extra coin and get licensed backhauls.

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com

 On 4/13/2010 8:06 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
 
 This is what I am in the process of doing now.  We have another 200 subs
 to be converted next month.  Then another 100 subs after that.  Not only
 is it a multiple truck roll incident, but I already paid for the
 MikroTik gear...and now am replacing customer equipment with Canopy.
 ROI just got extended an additional 6 months.  We just replaced a
 complete Trango 900 AP with Canopy 900.  Performance is just better and
 it scales.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:24 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

 Hi,

 Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale
 infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low and
 consistent (less than 10ms). With UBNT, you can build a system much
 cheaper, and one that will probably work in a small, rural area.
 However, it does not scale.

 So, the question you have to ask is: Will your network ever grow to the
 size that you run out of channels? On a single tower, there are roughly
 six legal channels in the 5.8ghz band (using 20mhz channel size). None
 of the other channels are legal with UBNT gear. So you have 6 channels
 to use for your entire network, and you can't co-locate near adjacent
 channels, and you can't have two AP's on different towers facing each
 other on the same channel.

 The problem we made on our network was trying to use Mikrotik for PtMP
 deployments and discovering that it doesn't scale. We ended up having to
 go to every customer we had installed on two big towers and change them
 out to Canopy. So we had to roll a truck twice. :(

 Travis
 Microserv


 Glenn Kelley wrote:

   
 In trying to make the right buying decision - some simple answers may
 help.



 1.  What is the meantime failure rate for your ubiquity equipment

 2.  What is the avg amount of truck rolls per week you run to fix an
 issue vs the # of customers you have?
 ie- if you have say 1500 clients and do 8 troubleshooting calls a week

 
 then it would be 1500/8 = .0053% )

 3.  how often does a tech call come in (w/o a truck roll) that is
 equipment related...  For some reason I think some of the ubiquity
 radios just need a power cycle and voila - they behave much 

Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

2010-04-14 Thread Josh Luthman
Satellite at 5mbps?  Not going to happen.

Mobile cards will be quicker but very area dependant.

On 4/14/10, Charles Hooper choo...@plumata.com wrote:
 Hello,

 I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer.
 My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage in that
 area already. I don't have any towers in the area (or any at all) so my
 thoughts are that I would have to talk some local building owners into
 letting me put some small antennas on their roof. Do you have any tips
 for negotiating these kinds of deals?

 Alternatively, I've seen a few people mention using satellite Internet;
 I'm wondering who you all use? I've been planning on needing 5Mbps
 connectivity. Are there other alternatives for what I'm trying to do?

 Thanks in advance,
 Charles


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
When you say no coverage, are you meaning there is NO internet access there
or that you have no coverage yourself with wireless?  If internet is indeed
available there via a wire, then the rest is easy.



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:22 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

Satellite at 5mbps?  Not going to happen.

Mobile cards will be quicker but very area dependant.

On 4/14/10, Charles Hooper choo...@plumata.com wrote:
 Hello,

 I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer.
 My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage in that
 area already. I don't have any towers in the area (or any at all) so my
 thoughts are that I would have to talk some local building owners into
 letting me put some small antennas on their roof. Do you have any tips
 for negotiating these kinds of deals?

 Alternatively, I've seen a few people mention using satellite Internet;
 I'm wondering who you all use? I've been planning on needing 5Mbps
 connectivity. Are there other alternatives for what I'm trying to do?

 Thanks in advance,
 Charles





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.
--- Winston Churchill




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
You got it!  But hey, I was the same way back in the day but then it was red 
boxing and phone hacking.  (Ohio Bell made regular calls to my mother 
requesting her to have me take whatever it was off the line.  My nemesis at the 
phone company eventually became a good friend when I got older) If they're 
motivated they will rise to the challenge and when they do, my hats off to 
them!  At least they can get some GOOD experience from the effort, I hope 
anyway.

Bob-


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Those kids will then install Ubuntu using Wubi (if they have admin
rights), have the back-door bios passwords somewhere, or start
charring around a HDD and screwdriver.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
 Around here there are some kids with live linux on key drives they boot into
 to keep things private.  Set your boot order to not have USB or CD in the
 boot order and put an admin password on the bios.

 Bob-



 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:54 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Forgot to mention (like Victoria said) KeyLogger best I've found
 http://www.covenanteyes.com/ but it's not free. It can be put on a PC and
 the user never knows that its on there you just get an email as to what that
 pc did.  Still wont stop the Zune.


 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and
 such.  There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and locks
 down a PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows
 vista and Win7 to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of
 them protect Zunes, iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and
 install that on your home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There
 are ways you can bypass this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you are
 on this list, I expect your son knows his way around network settings.  As
 the old sayings go where there is a will there is a way.

 I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my
 clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
 Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got

 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and

 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted

 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over

 18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 

Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

2010-04-14 Thread Jeff Ehman
We have seen a lot of this actually.  For small trailer parks or neighborhood 
blocks that can't see a tower.  Basically, have a Moto SM go to a rooftop that 
can reach the AP and then put a NS2 behind it pointing in the direction of a 
group of houses that you normally can't see.  Put the NS2 in AP mode and reach 
an addition 5-10 customers.  The cost of a Moto AP may not justify adding a 
small 5-10 customers but the NS2 makes a little more sense.  

I personally wouldn't recommend this because network management can become a 
huge PITA but for smaller SPs every dollar increase matters. 

-Jeff
Convergence Technologies 
There is a difference

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Francois D. Menard
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 7:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

Actually, both work together ... we extend our Canopy PPPoE bridged segments 
with Ubnt's for el-cheapo point-to-point extensions ...

Sort of a Moto Canopy P2MP-to-UBnt(P)-to-UBnt(P)

F.

On 2010-04-13, at 8:29 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

 It's not so much what you're discussing there as much as the capabilities of
 the ptmp products.
 
 You simply can not offer the latency guarantees using Ubiquiti/802.11 that
 Canopy provides.
 
 Now if you've got 3 people to serve I think it's financially ridiculous to
 get a Canopy system involved...
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.
 --- Winston Churchill
 
 
 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
 
 In trying to make the right buying decision - some simple answers may
 help.
 
 
 
 1.  What is the meantime failure rate for your ubiquity equipment
 
 2.  What is the avg amount of truck rolls per week you run to fix an
 issue vs the # of customers you have?
 ie- if you have say 1500 clients and do 8 troubleshooting calls a week
 then it would be 1500/8 = .0053% )
 
 3.  how often does a tech call come in (w/o a truck roll) that is
 equipment related...  For some reason I think some of the ubiquity
 radios just need a power cycle and voila - they behave much better...
 so - what is the average # of calls per total clients that come in
 that are fixed w/ simple methods vs a truck roll for the ubiquity
 users ...
 
 
 
 Moto Users - do you have this info as well:
 
 Reason I ask is because I am wondering - if the cost of Moto is
 actually worth it...  as a smaller operator - this information would
 be most beneficial for sure.
 
 Buying a Moto radio - even if 2 or 3 times the $$ if - the service
 calls on the back side are much less - might be worth it.
 
 Perhaps the cost of Radio vs People (both in manpower as well as
 client satisfaction for uptime) make the buying decision much
 easier...  but having some numbers to go along with this would be great.
 
 
 Thanks
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

2010-04-14 Thread chooper

No coverage myself with wireless, I apologize for the confusion.

-Original Message-
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:25am
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

When you say no coverage, are you meaning there is NO internet access there
or that you have no coverage yourself with wireless? If internet is indeed
available there via a wire, then the rest is easy.



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:22 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

Satellite at 5mbps? Not going to happen.

Mobile cards will be quicker but very area dependant.

On 4/14/10, Charles Hooper choo...@plumata.com wrote:
 Hello,

 I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer.
 My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage in that
 area already. I don't have any towers in the area (or any at all) so my
 thoughts are that I would have to talk some local building owners into
 letting me put some small antennas on their roof. Do you have any tips
 for negotiating these kinds of deals?

 Alternatively, I've seen a few people mention using satellite Internet;
 I'm wondering who you all use? I've been planning on needing 5Mbps
 connectivity. Are there other alternatives for what I'm trying to do?

 Thanks in advance,
 Charles





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.
--- Winston Churchill




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Mike
Marlon asked: So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control
your kids these days?

I taught them respect for others.  I taught them to treat the janitor the
same as they'd treat the principal.  I taught them to befriend the
friendless.

I taught them honesty and integrity, and demonstrated by example.  

Tell them regularly you are proud of them.  Trust them unless given reason
not to trust.  Listen.  Listen some more.  Ask good questions.  Show an
interest in what they are and what they do.

My situation may be different than some other's, but I did some other
things.

I taught them how to handle guns with safety and to shoot.  I taught them
early how to drive a vehicle, as soon as they could see over the steering
wheel, we took the Jeep out in the sticks and I taught them to drive.  

Parenting is not easy.  Kids don't come with an owner's manual, and
unfortunately don't come with an on-off switch. 

God speed in your parenting.  Be careful you don't come down too hard and
alienate them.  Some such rifts last for years.

Be aware that at 13, a kid thinks you are the most stupid person in the
world, but at 21 will have an epiphany that you were right all along.  Be
aware that whoever coined the term terrible twos, never met a 4 year old,
OR a 13 year old.

Mike





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
Well, for temp access I'm sure some of the businesses have internet, piggy
back onto them and set a bandwidth limit so as not to suck them dry.  Again,
a festival committee could probably line them up for you and they could be
added as a sponsor of the free wireless internet.  Depending on the size of
the festival, you may only need a couple of bullets with an omni on each.  

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of choo...@plumata.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:41 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?


No coverage myself with wireless, I apologize for the confusion.

-Original Message-
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:25am
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

When you say no coverage, are you meaning there is NO internet access there
or that you have no coverage yourself with wireless? If internet is indeed
available there via a wire, then the rest is easy.



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:22 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

Satellite at 5mbps? Not going to happen.

Mobile cards will be quicker but very area dependant.

On 4/14/10, Charles Hooper choo...@plumata.com wrote:
 Hello,

 I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer.
 My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage in that
 area already. I don't have any towers in the area (or any at all) so my
 thoughts are that I would have to talk some local building owners into
 letting me put some small antennas on their roof. Do you have any tips
 for negotiating these kinds of deals?

 Alternatively, I've seen a few people mention using satellite Internet;
 I'm wondering who you all use? I've been planning on needing 5Mbps
 connectivity. Are there other alternatives for what I'm trying to do?

 Thanks in advance,
 Charles





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.
--- Winston Churchill




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
You could always send them back to Russia with a note saying you no longer
want them.  Right?

Obscure news story.  sorry.



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:41 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Marlon asked: So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control
your kids these days?

I taught them respect for others.  I taught them to treat the janitor the
same as they'd treat the principal.  I taught them to befriend the
friendless.

I taught them honesty and integrity, and demonstrated by example.  

Tell them regularly you are proud of them.  Trust them unless given reason
not to trust.  Listen.  Listen some more.  Ask good questions.  Show an
interest in what they are and what they do.

My situation may be different than some other's, but I did some other
things.

I taught them how to handle guns with safety and to shoot.  I taught them
early how to drive a vehicle, as soon as they could see over the steering
wheel, we took the Jeep out in the sticks and I taught them to drive.  

Parenting is not easy.  Kids don't come with an owner's manual, and
unfortunately don't come with an on-off switch. 

God speed in your parenting.  Be careful you don't come down too hard and
alienate them.  Some such rifts last for years.

Be aware that at 13, a kid thinks you are the most stupid person in the
world, but at 21 will have an epiphany that you were right all along.  Be
aware that whoever coined the term terrible twos, never met a 4 year old,
OR a 13 year old.

Mike






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Blake Bowers
After getting 4 kids into their 20's, and learning from my
own mistakes (A LOT of them) this is what I have come up
with.

TRUST.

As soon as you expressly forbid them to do something, you have
waived that red flag in front of them, and they will find a way.

And you know, with the Zunes, Ipods, Cell phones, PSP's, etc, all
with internet access, as well as library computers, school computers
(the password to unlock the browsing safety program is well known)
friends computers, etc, kids will access the net without you knowing
about it, and they will do some stupid things.

Teach them the consequences, both from you and from the real world,
what can happen, and then be there.


Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them down here!
Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.

- Original Message - 
From: Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:49 AM
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids


 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that 
 might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd 
 been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I 
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't 
 know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net 
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the 
 deleted
 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email 
 address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was 
 over
 18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids 
 these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
Yesterday my 13 year old son made me proud for about 10 seconds when we were
working on a project for school.  The paper asked, Who has been the biggest
influence in your life?.  He says, My Dad! with a big grin.  The wife is
all happy too and asks why and he points to his belly.  Cause I eat what he
eats and my belly is big!  

Hmm.



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:41 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Marlon asked: So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control
your kids these days?

I taught them respect for others.  I taught them to treat the janitor the
same as they'd treat the principal.  I taught them to befriend the
friendless.

I taught them honesty and integrity, and demonstrated by example.  

Tell them regularly you are proud of them.  Trust them unless given reason
not to trust.  Listen.  Listen some more.  Ask good questions.  Show an
interest in what they are and what they do.

My situation may be different than some other's, but I did some other
things.

I taught them how to handle guns with safety and to shoot.  I taught them
early how to drive a vehicle, as soon as they could see over the steering
wheel, we took the Jeep out in the sticks and I taught them to drive.  

Parenting is not easy.  Kids don't come with an owner's manual, and
unfortunately don't come with an on-off switch. 

God speed in your parenting.  Be careful you don't come down too hard and
alienate them.  Some such rifts last for years.

Be aware that at 13, a kid thinks you are the most stupid person in the
world, but at 21 will have an epiphany that you were right all along.  Be
aware that whoever coined the term terrible twos, never met a 4 year old,
OR a 13 year old.

Mike






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

2010-04-14 Thread Dennis Burgess
Drop in your own bandwidth, and run off generator of batteries.  WE ran
an entire festival over a weekend off 4 car batteries, and a 30 foot
push up pole :)  

---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, Mikrotik Certified Trainer, MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE,
MTCTCE, MTCUME 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of Learn RouterOS


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Hooper
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

Hello,

I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer.

My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage in that 
area already. I don't have any towers in the area (or any at all) so my 
thoughts are that I would have to talk some local building owners into 
letting me put some small antennas on their roof. Do you have any tips 
for negotiating these kinds of deals?

Alternatively, I've seen a few people mention using satellite Internet; 
I'm wondering who you all use? I've been planning on needing 5Mbps 
connectivity. Are there other alternatives for what I'm trying to do?

Thanks in advance,
Charles




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Ryan Spott
Marlon,

I think the issues you have here are common ones wether or not computers,
hotmail, myspace or facebook are involved. They are just parent child
issues.

I used to be a technology coordinator for a school district. If you place
security software on the machines, it will be worked around in minutes. The
best thing I ever did was remove all of the stuff blocking everything,
turned all of the machines around so I could see all the screens in the
classrooms from the position you were teaching from and then put out the
word in a whisper campaign that The School Tech guy can see EVERYTHING! :)
 This also works in corp environments... a quick walk into the
sheep-porn-surfing-CFOs office with a stern I see everything... and I mean
everything stops that stuff cold!



In my personal life (I still consider myself young) I found that trust
between parent and kid was the best method.

The best thing my mother did was sit down with me one day and just tell me
some of the crazy (s**t)... er things she did when she was my age... After
hearing of:
-The occasional kegger in the woods with her girlfriends (pull '69 Lincoln
into the beer warehouse, place kegs in back seat, fill back seat with ice,
go to party...)
-Dating and all the things that went on with that.
-Dating my dad (stop mom, I don't want to hear that!!)
-disagreements with her parents.
-occasional trouble in school.
-etc, etc, etc..
I really started being really open with my mother because I knew that the
things I was doing (staying out late occasionally, hanging out with friends,
the occasional bottle of Boones grape flavored wine...) were minor things
that she had done and were not as shocking to her as I thought.

Because she was open with me about the good decisions and the bad ones she
made, I was open with her. This open communication allows me to ask her
advice on _ANYTHING_ because she was, and is not, judging me. While I have
not always taken her advice, it has helped me make decisions from my teenage
years till now...

Of course. As it should be, when I was doing something that my mother would
think was 'bad' the guilt would make me stop...

When my now 7 year old is a bit older, my wife and I have agreed to share
all of our life experiences with her. Good or bad. Sometimes it helps to
know your parents were not saints and did make mistakes. We hope she comes
to us with her problems, not so we can judge her, but so we can offer her
our advice.

We hope she learns from our mistakes. I want her to be the kid that calls me
when she is drunk at 17 to come pick her up, rather than driving home to
hide the fact she is drunk. I want her to know that there will be A HELL OF
ALOT MORE trouble if my fire pager goes off and I have to cut her out of her
car in the middle of the night than there would be if she pukes in my back
seat.

DDD That was way too much information to give out on the list. I
think I might need a new group-ther...@wispa.org list-serv!

Good luck Marlon, from a former teenage domestic terrorist all I can say is
I am pretty sure your kid will survive... and prosper... I mean, you are his
dad and you are a great example to follow!

I have to go now. I need to call my mom! :)

ryan



On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Marlon K. Schafer 
o...@odessaoffice.comwrote:

 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the
 deleted
 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was
 over
 18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information!  go get it 

Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Larry Yunker
I have to echo Mike's sentiments on this subject.  If a kid is motivated,
they will find a way around any technical barrier that you put in place to
stop them from posting/texting/sexting/etc.  There are public computers,
cell-phones, ipod/ipads, thumb drives, and damn near a million ways to get
on line.

The best method to protect children has been around for years... Teach them
respect for themselves and others.  Teach them to recognize the difference
between right and wrong.  Teach them to be leaders not followers.  

I have two sons ages 9 and 11.  One's a WEBELOS (Cub Scout)  the other is a
TENDERFOOT (Boy Scout).  We have three or four planned activities every
month and it IS A TIME COMMITMENT!  The boys have learned how to camp, how
use a knife properly, how to shoot,  how to show respect to others, to the
flag, to our country, to god, and to family.  I used to think Boy Scouts
were a thing of the past... but I have renewed respect for the organization.
It provides a structure to teach boys many of the life-skills that have been
forgotten in this day-and-age and it provides an outlet to allow parents to
become involved in the lives of their children.

Best of luck to all of you parents, it's not easy but it is rewarding when
you can look back on the lives that you helped foster.

Regards,
Larry Yunker

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:41 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Marlon asked: So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control
your kids these days?

I taught them respect for others.  I taught them to treat the janitor the
same as they'd treat the principal.  I taught them to befriend the
friendless.

I taught them honesty and integrity, and demonstrated by example.  

Tell them regularly you are proud of them.  Trust them unless given reason
not to trust.  Listen.  Listen some more.  Ask good questions.  Show an
interest in what they are and what they do.

My situation may be different than some other's, but I did some other
things.

I taught them how to handle guns with safety and to shoot.  I taught them
early how to drive a vehicle, as soon as they could see over the steering
wheel, we took the Jeep out in the sticks and I taught them to drive.  

Parenting is not easy.  Kids don't come with an owner's manual, and
unfortunately don't come with an on-off switch. 

God speed in your parenting.  Be careful you don't come down too hard and
alienate them.  Some such rifts last for years.

Be aware that at 13, a kid thinks you are the most stupid person in the
world, but at 21 will have an epiphany that you were right all along.  Be
aware that whoever coined the term terrible twos, never met a 4 year old,
OR a 13 year old.

Mike






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Broadband Fiasco Followup

2010-04-14 Thread Mike Hammett
Nice, Matt, nice...


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:50 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; nnsq...@nnsquad.org; 
Telecom Regulation  the Internet cyberteleco...@listserv.aol.com
Subject: [WISPA] Broadband Fiasco Followup

 Apparently my tirade about broadband mapping reached a few ears in
 Washington, as the NE PSC called me this afternoon to let me know that
 the NTIA is willing to accept shape files and is willing to relax some
 of the data requirements in order to get fuller representation from
 WISPs.Making ourselves heard and showing a willingness to be part of
 the solution is the first step to getting better results.


 Here is a copy of the email that I sent to the Nebraska PSC today with
 my followup comments.   Other commentary and discussion regarding this
 is available at Wireless Cowboys http://www.wirelesscowboys.com/


 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com


 I am writing with further comments and concerns about the Nebraska
 Broadband Mapping Initiative. After participating in the conference call
 about the mapping program yesterday, I was left with several concerns.

 My first concern is about the accuracy of the data that will be
 collected. The number of providers that have not responded to the NDA
 request and/or the data request is very high, and that means that there
 will be substantial inaccuracies in the final dataset that will make the
 final results of the project flawed. A dataset that only includes 20-50%
 of the total data needed could lead to policy decisions that could have
 an adverse affect on the smaller providers that cover otherwise unserved
 areas by encouraging government supported overbuilds. This would be
 wasteful of taxpayer money and could put many of the smaller providers
 out of business, causing a net loss of jobs and the loss of broadband
 service to customers of those smaller providers. It is critical that
 most if not all of the broadband providers in the state be represented
 in this project. The attitude that the state contractor appears to have
 is that non respondents will simply not be included. I would hope that
 this attitude will change to be more inclusive of the smaller,
 non-wireline providers who do not have the ability to generate the
 requested data easily.

 My second concern is about the data that is being requested. The data
 request template is asking for a lot of data that I don't feel
 comfortable divulging to any outside entities, including customer
 addresses, GPS coordinates and frequencies used on our towers and the
 anchor institutions that we serve. Many of the other WISPs that I work
 with are also not comfortable turning this information over to an
 outside party, even with the NDA. After several discussions with other
 experts in the mapping and data collection field, I have come to the
 conclusion that the mapping requirements would be effectively served by
 delivering the GIS shape files of our coverage areas along with a
 summary of subscribers in each census block. I have already delivered
 the requested shape files showing our coverage, and am working toward
 the census block summaries. If the data requirements could be adjusted
 so that this information would be suitable, I believe that you would get
 more response from the smaller providers.

 My third concern is about the cost for smaller, non-wireline providers
 to collect the data. While most wireline providers already have shape
 files and geocoding information already collected and available, many
 wireless providers do not have this information readily available and do
 not have the tools or technical knowledge to get this information
 collected within the requested time frame. Committing man hours to do
 this in-house or bring in outside assistance places an undue financial
 burden on providers that are often self-funded and would prefer to
 invest that money into their networks. The grant was given to the PSC,
 not the providers, and yet we are being asked to spend our time and
 money to get this information together. Coming up with a way to help
 provide the manpower and financial assistance necessary to collect this
 information would provide a win-win situation for the providers and the
 PSC and increase the amount of data collected.

 Finally, I believe that more effective outreach could be established
 with the providers so that the comfort level is higher. Sending an email
 with a large data request and a short deadline for response is not going
 to be received well. A series of emails with detailed explanations of
 the program's purposes and benefits to providers, an intelligently
 designed website with progress reports and followup phone calls to the
 providers who have not returned the information would go over much
 better. WISPs have not been required to collect this 

Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
If YOU came to me about something your kid was doing on MY system *I* would 
try to help you out as much as I could.

But then again, I'm not a mega corp either.  To me your kid is more valuable 
than the money I'd loose by running off a few customers.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids


My soon to be 4 and 7 yo boys have iMacs. They are locked down and
just do not know about that stuff yet. I removed
access to the web browser in the PSP cause the oldest found it. He
does not know how to use it (or so I think). The best
parents can do these days is be very proactive which you seam to be
trying to do. I do not know the legalities of monitoring
a kids device, i leave that up to parents and their lawyers. There are
key loggers for pretty much everything out there, VPN's
to make sure the data comes back to you first, and so on. Talk to your
lawyer. If your child has access to these services from
another location then I would assume access from there will or has
been used. Find out if so and who owns it, you might be
able to access much of that history from there. Also the great way
back machine and google cache can often have copies of
peoples pages. Talk with your lawyer. If I came to you and said your
site had given access to my minor, how would your advisers
tell you to respond? Likely to fluff me off as fast as possible to
avoid any liability. It could take a simple request from a letter
head to get them moving on it, or possibly real threat of legal
action. Did I mention, talk to your lawyer. S/He will be the best
source of information for correct surveilla^R^R parenting of digital 
children.


On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario. My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain. They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that 
 might
 bite them in the butt later. The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account. He used a hotmail email
 address to get it. He had permission to use neither of them. I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd 
 been
 saying. His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I 
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it. (I didn't know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net 
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc. deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the 
 deleted
 information. I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me. I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue. However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information! They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account. Nothing to verify that the child was 
 over
 18 etc. And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information! go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this??? Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids 
 these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

2010-04-14 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Washington asked for a lot of info.  I wouldn't give it to them so I don't 
remember exactly what they wanted
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Brian Webster bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org; memb...@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:28 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies


 To All;

My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list of 
 the
 states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer
 addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping
 track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward that
 directly to the NTIA. We now have a person I can contact directly to 
 express
 our concerns with this process as necessary. The NTIA has weekly 
 conference
 calls with the states so there are opportunities to help this process 
 along.





 Thank You,

 Brian Webster





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Eje Gustafsson
We taken the other route. My son got his own domain, he got his own e-mail
for his domain. Allowed him a Facebook account he have to have us as friends
and we know the password. I get a copy (unknown by him) of any e-mails going
to his e-mail account. We had the talk about proper online behavior such as
never to share contact information such as address and phone number. 
He got his own netbook and itouch used to be limited what he could do by a
software but it had so much flaws we disabled it (windows account is a
limited account so can't install software). The router (mikrotik) logs the
addresses he is visiting thanks to webproxy setup. On the itouch he do not
have setup so he can install programs himself but he will ask and so far
only been one app we wouldn't install (comic reader that could access as
adult type comics and explained to him why wouldn't allow that one but found
another software that would allow comic access but without adult content). 

So far so good. Daughter also got her own netbook but still using the
software on it and it works best for her for now because it simplifies
things on it for her. 

We tried the other way around with the older kids and it didn't work to
great to be honest and was why the webproxy got setup in the first place and
wish that XP been the OS back then so we could have given them limited
access to windows but that was back in the days of 98. 

/ Eje

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hi All,

Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email 
addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace, 
facebook etc. sites.

If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can 
delete things from.

I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might 
bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the 
stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email 
address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally 
found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been 
saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got

the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know 
that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and

work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted

information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had 
no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden 
from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However 
they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO 
proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over

18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account 
information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these 
days?

thanks
marlon





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Ryan Spott
I worked at the MSN SOC (Service Operations Center) for a short while where
requests like the one you listed below come in.

Our hands were tied. There are specific hoops we had to jump through for ANY
request of this type.

Basically, there is a law enforcement fax number that goes to corporate
legal. They review it and action is taken from there. IIRC, On an emergent
cases we could clone the account and keep data either locked, or allow it to
be accessed with a shadow copy to keep evidence/information intact and
non-deleted. An emergent case would be one that may lead to immediate harm
to an individual (kidnapping, suicide, murder etc)...

Parent/child is not a criminal matter, it is a domestic/civil one.

Service providers are not domestic refs or law enforcement. *sigh* and let
me tell you, it is a fine line that I wanted to leap across... often.

ryan

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:

 I tried to help a customer get Yahoo to delete her email account and it
 took
 us almost an entire year to get some action.  No, they wouldn't delete it,
 they would only LOCK it.  And that, sadly enough, took a letter from her
 attorney.

 As I've heard many times, there is no delete button on the internet.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of St. Louis Broadband
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:44 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Hey marlon,
 Sigh...mine is finally 18!
 However, I totally understand the situation and had to cope with it myself.
 I employed a key logger.

 ~V~

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:50 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
 Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I
 got

 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net
 and

 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the
 deleted

 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was
 over

 18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

2010-04-14 Thread jp
Maine has asked for it. I'll try to get some details privately emailed 
to you.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:28:46AM -0400, Brian Webster wrote:
 To All;
 
 My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list of the
 states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer
 addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping
 track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward that
 directly to the NTIA. We now have a person I can contact directly to express
 our concerns with this process as necessary. The NTIA has weekly conference
 calls with the states so there are opportunities to help this process along.
 
  
 
 
 
 Thank You,
 
 Brian Webster
 
  
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
/*
Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting 
 http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
*/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Jeromie Reeves
Ok granted I should have seen that response. I meant to phrase is in a
business way, i failed. My point is that $corp liability
will trump $random.person in most cases. It also was not about running
of customers but about the liability of actions. The
more mom  pop like a company, the more likely they are to assist
others (in pretty much all areas).



On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com 
wrote:
 If YOU came to me about something your kid was doing on MY system *I* would
 try to help you out as much as I could.

 But then again, I'm not a mega corp either.  To me your kid is more valuable
 than the money I'd loose by running off a few customers.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids


 My soon to be 4 and 7 yo boys have iMacs. They are locked down and
 just do not know about that stuff yet. I removed
 access to the web browser in the PSP cause the oldest found it. He
 does not know how to use it (or so I think). The best
 parents can do these days is be very proactive which you seam to be
 trying to do. I do not know the legalities of monitoring
 a kids device, i leave that up to parents and their lawyers. There are
 key loggers for pretty much everything out there, VPN's
 to make sure the data comes back to you first, and so on. Talk to your
 lawyer. If your child has access to these services from
 another location then I would assume access from there will or has
 been used. Find out if so and who owns it, you might be
 able to access much of that history from there. Also the great way
 back machine and google cache can often have copies of
 peoples pages. Talk with your lawyer. If I came to you and said your
 site had given access to my minor, how would your advisers
 tell you to respond? Likely to fluff me off as fast as possible to
 avoid any liability. It could take a simple request from a letter
 head to get them moving on it, or possibly real threat of legal
 action. Did I mention, talk to your lawyer. S/He will be the best
 source of information for correct surveilla^R^R parenting of digital
 children.


 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
 o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario. My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain. They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that
 might
 bite them in the butt later. The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account. He used a hotmail email
 address to get it. He had permission to use neither of them. I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd
 been
 saying. His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it. (I didn't know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc. deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the
 deleted
 information. I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me. I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue. However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information! They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account. Nothing to verify that the child was
 over
 18 etc. And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information! go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this??? Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids
 these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

2010-04-14 Thread Ryan Spott
Maybe we should just have a WISPA Standard.

I propose we have Brian (or someone else) whip up a quick web-page that we
can put our coverage areas on.

Then WISPA can just submit that data to the state agencies on our behalf.

Then WISPA becomes a clearing house for WISP information... this may make
lobbying for changes in information gathering a little easier.

*off to go get pop-corn to watch the show I just started on this list*

ryan


On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:13 AM, jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com wrote:

 Maine has asked for it. I'll try to get some details privately emailed
 to you.

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:28:46AM -0400, Brian Webster wrote:
  To All;
 
  My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list of
 the
  states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer
  addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping
  track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward that
  directly to the NTIA. We now have a person I can contact directly to
 express
  our concerns with this process as necessary. The NTIA has weekly
 conference
  calls with the states so there are opportunities to help this process
 along.
 
 
 
 
 
  Thank You,
 
  Brian Webster
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 --
 /*
 Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting
  http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
 */



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

2010-04-14 Thread Mike Hammett
In my discussions with CN, all they wanted was tower information.  Location, 
frequency, equipment types, etc.  I worked with the people previously 
mentioned on the list.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Brian Webster bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:28 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org; memb...@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

 To All;

My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list of 
 the
 states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer
 addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping
 track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward that
 directly to the NTIA. We now have a person I can contact directly to 
 express
 our concerns with this process as necessary. The NTIA has weekly 
 conference
 calls with the states so there are opportunities to help this process 
 along.





 Thank You,

 Brian Webster





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

2010-04-14 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
In Ohio they are asking basically for your oversubscription weight. Here is
the paragraph exactly as it appears on the form:

[per NTIA]: A provider’s subscriber-weighted nominal speed (in kbps) should
be calculated as the sum of the products of the provider’s advertised
maximum download data transmission rate (in kbps) for each residential rate
tier advertised by the provider in the county, times the average monthly
number of residential subscribers receiving the advertised download
transmission rate tier for the relevant reporting month (i.e., June or
December, as applicable), divided by the average total number of residential
subscribers for all the included data transmission rate tiers in the county
for that month. This is expressed in the following formula:
{[(speed tier-1 in kbps) x (no. of tier-1 subscribers)] + [(speed tier-2 in
kbps) x (no. of tier-2 subscribers)] + … } ÷
[total average monthly subscribers]
For example, if the service provider offers two tiers of service with
advertised maximum download speeds of 1500 kbps and 6000 kbps, calculate the
product of 1500 kbps times the average monthly number of residential
subscribers to the 1500 kbps speed tier plus the product of 6000 kbps times
the average monthly number of residential subscribers to the 6000 kbps speed
tier and divide the sum by the sum (or total) of the average monthly number
of residential subscribers in both tiers.

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:51 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

In my discussions with CN, all they wanted was tower information.  Location,

frequency, equipment types, etc.  I worked with the people previously 
mentioned on the list.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Brian Webster bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:28 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org; memb...@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Experiences with State Broadband Mapping Agencies

 To All;

My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list of 
 the
 states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer
 addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping
 track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward that
 directly to the NTIA. We now have a person I can contact directly to 
 express
 our concerns with this process as necessary. The NTIA has weekly 
 conference
 calls with the states so there are opportunities to help this process 
 along.





 Thank You,

 Brian Webster








 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread RickG
I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
poor signal, dropped packets,  low throughput. Replacing them with
regular units fix the issue. What gives?

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Larry Yunker
For what it is worth, it looks like the issue of liability and disclosure of
private information is a concern to ISPs as they are faced with parent/child
relations.  Maybe an effective solution to this matter would be to modify
your terms-of-service to indicate that (1) accounts may not be opened by
minors - i.e. parental consent is required; (2) accounts for which a parent
and/or guardian has authorized use by a minor are subject to monitoring
and/or disclosure of any account activity to the authorizing parent and/or
guardian.

It seems to me that such language would open the door for an ISP to turn
over email to the parent upon request or even put a packet sniffer in place
and pull passwords for places such as Facebook, MySpace, or Gmail.  

I know that this all sounds pretty big-brother like and I don't encourage
active monitoring of customer activities.  It's a fine line we walk between
being supportive and being intrusive.

- Larry Yunker

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Ok granted I should have seen that response. I meant to phrase is in a
business way, i failed. My point is that $corp liability
will trump $random.person in most cases. It also was not about running
of customers but about the liability of actions. The
more mom  pop like a company, the more likely they are to assist
others (in pretty much all areas).



On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com
wrote:
 If YOU came to me about something your kid was doing on MY system *I*
would
 try to help you out as much as I could.

 But then again, I'm not a mega corp either.  To me your kid is more
valuable
 than the money I'd loose by running off a few customers.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids


 My soon to be 4 and 7 yo boys have iMacs. They are locked down and
 just do not know about that stuff yet. I removed
 access to the web browser in the PSP cause the oldest found it. He
 does not know how to use it (or so I think). The best
 parents can do these days is be very proactive which you seam to be
 trying to do. I do not know the legalities of monitoring
 a kids device, i leave that up to parents and their lawyers. There are
 key loggers for pretty much everything out there, VPN's
 to make sure the data comes back to you first, and so on. Talk to your
 lawyer. If your child has access to these services from
 another location then I would assume access from there will or has
 been used. Find out if so and who owns it, you might be
 able to access much of that history from there. Also the great way
 back machine and google cache can often have copies of
 peoples pages. Talk with your lawyer. If I came to you and said your
 site had given access to my minor, how would your advisers
 tell you to respond? Likely to fluff me off as fast as possible to
 avoid any liability. It could take a simple request from a letter
 head to get them moving on it, or possibly real threat of legal
 action. Did I mention, talk to your lawyer. S/He will be the best
 source of information for correct surveilla^R^R parenting of digital
 children.


 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
 o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario. My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain. They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that
 might
 bite them in the butt later. The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account. He used a hotmail email
 address to get it. He had permission to use neither of them. I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd
 been
 saying. His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it. (I didn't
know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc. deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the
 deleted
 information. I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being
hidden
 from me. I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email
address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue. However
 they flatly refused 

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison

2010-04-14 Thread John Scrivner
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.netwrote:

 Yeah, funny, does not look like we are making much progress after 18 years
 does it.


Maybe it has something to do with the love affair most in this industry have
with focusing their plans over and over again on rigging up 802.11 products
(vendors and WISPs alike) and proprietary systems instead of concentrating
our buying and our building on outdoor, purpose-built standards like WiMAX
which would allow us to mature as an industry. There is a reason why DSL and
DOCSIS were created and supported by the telco and cable industries. They
understand the importance of creating a mass market and standards based
solution in order to drive their industry. The WISP industry seems to not
understand this.
John Scrivner



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Mike Hammett
You've probably seen plenty of things on my FB that would make a father 
cringe.  ;-)


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Jeff Broadwick jeffl...@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:50 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 We use Bluecoat K9 and are very happy with it so far.

 My 14 and 13 year olds have Facebook accounts...under the condition that 
 my
 wife and I are friended and have their passwords so that we can log in as
 them at any time.

 I found out that my son had a Google mail account a while back that he did
 not ask us for.  We killed it.

 We have one home computer.  It is a laptop and it stays in the main living
 areas.

 So far, I'm way ahead of the kids on technology and they know it.  They
 believe that we can track anything they can do (and we can...to a point).
 We check up enough so that they know we are watching.

 I don't think that there is a perfect solution.  If the kids are bound and
 determined to get to something they will do it.

 I tell kids that, before they hit send, they should think about what 
 their
 post/text/email would look like on the front page of the NY Times (back 
 when
 people read it!) above the fold.  I've seen posts from my kids friend's on
 Facebook that make me cringe.


 Regards,

 Jeff


 Jeff Broadwick
 ImageStream
 800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
 +1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and
 such.  There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and 
 locks
 down a PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows
 vista and Win7 to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of
 them protect Zunes, iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and
 install that on your home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There
 are ways you can bypass this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you 
 are
 on this list, I expect your son knows his way around network settings.  As
 the old sayings go where there is a will there is a way.

 I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my
 clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
 Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that 
 might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd 
 been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I 
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't 
 know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net 
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the 
 deleted
 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email 
 address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was 
 over
 18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids 
 these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

[WISPA] surge/lightning protection

2010-04-14 Thread RickG
I've been using home runs from the CPE to the POE unit but considering
using a demarc on the outside of the building for easier access. So,
I figure I may as well put LP protection there while I'm at it. Anyone
have a line on a good LP with ethernet access that will fit into a
small enclosure?



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Michael Baird
Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you 
upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

Regards
Michael Baird
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,  low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com  wrote:

 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Jeff Broadwick
I see language occasionally, but nothing particularly dirty.  I put those
things in different categories.  I am really surprised how many people use 4
letter words on f/b though.  



Regards,

Jeff


Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

You've probably seen plenty of things on my FB that would make a father
cringe.  ;-)


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Jeff Broadwick jeffl...@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:50 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 We use Bluecoat K9 and are very happy with it so far.

 My 14 and 13 year olds have Facebook accounts...under the condition that 
 my
 wife and I are friended and have their passwords so that we can log in as
 them at any time.

 I found out that my son had a Google mail account a while back that he did
 not ask us for.  We killed it.

 We have one home computer.  It is a laptop and it stays in the main living
 areas.

 So far, I'm way ahead of the kids on technology and they know it.  They
 believe that we can track anything they can do (and we can...to a point).
 We check up enough so that they know we are watching.

 I don't think that there is a perfect solution.  If the kids are bound and
 determined to get to something they will do it.

 I tell kids that, before they hit send, they should think about what 
 their
 post/text/email would look like on the front page of the NY Times (back 
 when
 people read it!) above the fold.  I've seen posts from my kids friend's on
 Facebook that make me cringe.


 Regards,

 Jeff


 Jeff Broadwick
 ImageStream
 800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
 +1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and
 such.  There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and 
 locks
 down a PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows
 vista and Win7 to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of
 them protect Zunes, iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and
 install that on your home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There
 are ways you can bypass this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you 
 are
 on this list, I expect your son knows his way around network settings.  As
 the old sayings go where there is a will there is a way.

 I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my
 clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
 Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that 
 might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd 
 been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I 
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't 
 know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net 
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the 
 deleted
 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email 
 address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child 

Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Mike Hammett
Great example?  Apparently you haven't seen the pictures.  :-p


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:12 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Marlon,

 I think the issues you have here are common ones wether or not computers,
 hotmail, myspace or facebook are involved. They are just parent child
 issues.

 I used to be a technology coordinator for a school district. If you place
 security software on the machines, it will be worked around in minutes. 
 The
 best thing I ever did was remove all of the stuff blocking everything,
 turned all of the machines around so I could see all the screens in the
 classrooms from the position you were teaching from and then put out the
 word in a whisper campaign that The School Tech guy can see EVERYTHING! 
 :)
 This also works in corp environments... a quick walk into the
 sheep-porn-surfing-CFOs office with a stern I see everything... and I 
 mean
 everything stops that stuff cold!



 In my personal life (I still consider myself young) I found that trust
 between parent and kid was the best method.

 The best thing my mother did was sit down with me one day and just tell me
 some of the crazy (s**t)... er things she did when she was my age... 
 After
 hearing of:
 -The occasional kegger in the woods with her girlfriends (pull '69 Lincoln
 into the beer warehouse, place kegs in back seat, fill back seat with ice,
 go to party...)
 -Dating and all the things that went on with that.
 -Dating my dad (stop mom, I don't want to hear that!!)
 -disagreements with her parents.
 -occasional trouble in school.
 -etc, etc, etc..
 I really started being really open with my mother because I knew that the
 things I was doing (staying out late occasionally, hanging out with 
 friends,
 the occasional bottle of Boones grape flavored wine...) were minor things
 that she had done and were not as shocking to her as I thought.

 Because she was open with me about the good decisions and the bad ones she
 made, I was open with her. This open communication allows me to ask her
 advice on _ANYTHING_ because she was, and is not, judging me. While I have
 not always taken her advice, it has helped me make decisions from my 
 teenage
 years till now...

 Of course. As it should be, when I was doing something that my mother 
 would
 think was 'bad' the guilt would make me stop...

 When my now 7 year old is a bit older, my wife and I have agreed to share
 all of our life experiences with her. Good or bad. Sometimes it helps to
 know your parents were not saints and did make mistakes. We hope she comes
 to us with her problems, not so we can judge her, but so we can offer her
 our advice.

 We hope she learns from our mistakes. I want her to be the kid that calls 
 me
 when she is drunk at 17 to come pick her up, rather than driving home to
 hide the fact she is drunk. I want her to know that there will be A HELL 
 OF
 ALOT MORE trouble if my fire pager goes off and I have to cut her out of 
 her
 car in the middle of the night than there would be if she pukes in my back
 seat.

 DDD That was way too much information to give out on the list. I
 think I might need a new group-ther...@wispa.org list-serv!

 Good luck Marlon, from a former teenage domestic terrorist all I can say 
 is
 I am pretty sure your kid will survive... and prosper... I mean, you are 
 his
 dad and you are a great example to follow!

 I have to go now. I need to call my mom! :)

 ryan



 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Marlon K. Schafer 
 o...@odessaoffice.comwrote:

 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that 
 might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting 
 the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd 
 been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't 
 know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the
 deleted
 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he 
 had
 no permission to use their site 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
What are some of the specifics that you came across.
There are some known issues to watchout for...

Best use the Ubiquiti Antenna's...
The Panels have built in Electrical downtilt in them.
There some strange issues with older firmware...5.1.2 seems to be more 
stable the previous ones.
Depending on which units you were testing, there was a hardware issue 
discovered with the original shipment of Rocket M's and NanoM's which 
would cause an drastically different signal levels in the two chains 
(Hpol  Vpol).
Some folks have seen issues with Ethernet duplex mismatch ...
Having said that, there are more Rocket M5 and NanoM5 which are running 
stable and great, than those who have discovered issues.
The first shipments / batches of NanoBridgesM5 are going thru this cycle 
now... Jury is still out on any conclusive evidence..

UBNT have been very proactive in identifying issues, and working on 
fixing them including RMA's for known mfg. defects / issues.

Faisal.


On 4/14/2010 11:00 AM, RickG wrote:
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,  low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com  wrote:

 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
I've went to using all AirGrids for my normal CPE installs, using the Nanos
for esthetics where we don't want a more visible grid.  They've worked great
for us.  I installed a 27dbi this past weekend that is 6 miles out and on
the lower end of the Fresnel but after the 5.1.5 firmware it behaves nicely.
Then again, I'm using mostly all UBNT sectors now as well.

I just love the ease of the things as well as the price.  

Have you upgraded the firmware to the newest Beta?  



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
poor signal, dropped packets,  low throughput. Replacing them with
regular units fix the issue. What gives?

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Jeff Broadwick
One of the real advantages I've found with K9 (and I'm sure just about any
other service) is how it locks searches into the filtered mode.

You can do the most innocent of searches and get some hard core stuff if the
results are unfiltered. 


Regards,

Jeff


Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:36 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

We taken the other route. My son got his own domain, he got his own e-mail
for his domain. Allowed him a Facebook account he have to have us as friends
and we know the password. I get a copy (unknown by him) of any e-mails going
to his e-mail account. We had the talk about proper online behavior such as
never to share contact information such as address and phone number. 
He got his own netbook and itouch used to be limited what he could do by a
software but it had so much flaws we disabled it (windows account is a
limited account so can't install software). The router (mikrotik) logs the
addresses he is visiting thanks to webproxy setup. On the itouch he do not
have setup so he can install programs himself but he will ask and so far
only been one app we wouldn't install (comic reader that could access as
adult type comics and explained to him why wouldn't allow that one but found
another software that would allow comic access but without adult content). 

So far so good. Daughter also got her own netbook but still using the
software on it and it works best for her for now because it simplifies
things on it for her. 

We tried the other way around with the older kids and it didn't work to
great to be honest and was why the webproxy got setup in the first place and
wish that XP been the OS back then so we could have given them limited
access to windows but that was back in the days of 98. 

/ Eje

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

Hi All,

Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
facebook etc. sites.

If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
delete things from.

I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might
bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been
saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got

the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't know
that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and

work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted

information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was over

18 etc.  And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
information!  go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

WTF is this???  Absolutly amazing.

So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these
days?

thanks
marlon





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! 

Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

2010-04-14 Thread Jerry Richardson
If you are an IKANO reseller you can order a contract-less DSL to a nearby 
address but I would partner with one or more local businesses to use their 
Internet. Satellite will work so poorly nobody will use the service and it's 
rediculously expensive.

Set up a SilverLining account and use these: 
http://www.silverliningnetworks.com/store/. These mesh repeaters are 
ISP-agnostic allowing you to use any ISP yet run from a single account and they 
are cheap enough you can springle them around. Alternately you could use any 
device router capable of supporting OpenWRT flashed with SilverLining's version.

With this setup you can provide free ad-supported WiFi and paid ad-free wifi on 
a temporary basis, show how well it works, and possibly sell some networks to 
some downtown associations, or Cities.

Jerry



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Charles Hooper
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?

Hello,

I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer. 
My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage in that 
area already. I don't have any towers in the area (or any at all) so my 
thoughts are that I would have to talk some local building owners into 
letting me put some small antennas on their roof. Do you have any tips 
for negotiating these kinds of deals?

Alternatively, I've seen a few people mention using satellite Internet; 
I'm wondering who you all use? I've been planning on needing 5Mbps 
connectivity. Are there other alternatives for what I'm trying to do?

Thanks in advance,
Charles



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison

2010-04-14 Thread Mike Hammett
That's because the WiMAX vendors want more to deliver less.  No WiMAX for me 
until APs are $500, CPE are $150,  and deliver over 50 megabits of capacity.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: John Scrivner j...@scrivner.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:03 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Tom DeReggi 
 wirelessn...@rapiddsl.netwrote:

 Yeah, funny, does not look like we are making much progress after 18 
 years
 does it.


 Maybe it has something to do with the love affair most in this industry 
 have
 with focusing their plans over and over again on rigging up 802.11 
 products
 (vendors and WISPs alike) and proprietary systems instead of concentrating
 our buying and our building on outdoor, purpose-built standards like WiMAX
 which would allow us to mature as an industry. There is a reason why DSL 
 and
 DOCSIS were created and supported by the telco and cable industries. They
 understand the importance of creating a mass market and standards based
 solution in order to drive their industry. The WISP industry seems to not
 understand this.
 John Scrivner


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
Ok I've been watching this thread since its beginning and I have to say it
now,

..Come on over to myspace, twitter my yahoo, till I google on your
facebook

Lol :)


Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

You've probably seen plenty of things on my FB that would make a father 
cringe.  ;-)


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Jeff Broadwick jeffl...@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:50 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 We use Bluecoat K9 and are very happy with it so far.

 My 14 and 13 year olds have Facebook accounts...under the condition that 
 my
 wife and I are friended and have their passwords so that we can log in as
 them at any time.

 I found out that my son had a Google mail account a while back that he did
 not ask us for.  We killed it.

 We have one home computer.  It is a laptop and it stays in the main living
 areas.

 So far, I'm way ahead of the kids on technology and they know it.  They
 believe that we can track anything they can do (and we can...to a point).
 We check up enough so that they know we are watching.

 I don't think that there is a perfect solution.  If the kids are bound and
 determined to get to something they will do it.

 I tell kids that, before they hit send, they should think about what 
 their
 post/text/email would look like on the front page of the NY Times (back 
 when
 people read it!) above the fold.  I've seen posts from my kids friend's on
 Facebook that make me cringe.


 Regards,

 Jeff


 Jeff Broadwick
 ImageStream
 800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
 +1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:29 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and
 such.  There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and 
 locks
 down a PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows
 vista and Win7 to keep them from over-ridding your settings.  But none of
 them protect Zunes, iPad, PSP's.  You will need a account with OpenDNS and
 install that on your home routers DNS config to make it work right.  There
 are ways you can bypass this for your use.  But knowing the teacher you 
 are
 on this list, I expect your son knows his way around network settings.  As
 the old sayings go where there is a will there is a way.

 I am considering setting up a OpenDNS Router and making it a option for my
 clients.  Routing all their traffic through it at their CPE.

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:50 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Cc: sp-...@sp-ceo.com
 Subject: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario.  My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain.  They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that 
 might
 bite them in the butt later.  The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account.  He used a hotmail email
 address to get it.  He had permission to use neither of them.  I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd 
 been
 saying.  His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I 
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it.  (I didn't 
 know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net 
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc.  deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the 
 deleted
 information.  I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me.  I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email 
 address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue.  However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information!  They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account.  Nothing to verify that the child was 
 over
 18 etc.  And *I* 

Re: [WISPA] Can you get an STD from Ubiquiti Equipment?

2010-04-14 Thread Ryan Spott
How could they get damaged? They use this to transport them from Asia: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawler-transporter

ryan

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:

 Would you rather something get damaged in shipping?

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:24 PM, can...@believewireless.net 
 p...@believewireless.net wrote:

  Do they really need to wrap every, single part?!?!?!?  Two packages of
  screws are wrapped and place in another
  bag that also holds the mounting clamps.  RocketDishes have the large
  bolts covered and wrapped, placed in
  plastic and zip tied.
 
  I've seen food with less sanitary methods.
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread RickG
Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
radio(s)?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,  low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com  wrote:

 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?

Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a 
sports car with all flat tires :)

There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the 
bad/defective units
Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power, 
little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two 
chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal 
level or off by a couple of db's..

Faisal.

On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com  wrote:

 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird
  
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.comwrote:


 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
Pay attention to your cable runs as well.  That 5v PoE sucks, I've been
using variable voltage adapters into a power injector and adjust the voltage
depending on how it's acting.  Sometimes, if the voltage is on the low side
for the cable run, the unit will power up but act stupid but if I hit it
with another volt or 2 it behaves.

Bob-


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
radio(s)?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,  low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com  wrote:

 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
5V is only an issue with the Airgridsthe others (Rockets and Nanos ) 
are using 24v or 15v power supplies.
And yes, if you are using the Airgirds, pay attention to the cable run

Faisal.

On 4/14/2010 11:41 AM, Robert West wrote:
 Pay attention to your cable runs as well.  That 5v PoE sucks, I've been
 using variable voltage adapters into a power injector and adjust the voltage
 depending on how it's acting.  Sometimes, if the voltage is on the low side
 for the cable run, the unit will power up but act stupid but if I hit it
 with another volt or 2 it behaves.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:34 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com  wrote:

 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird
  
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.comwrote:


 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes



  
 
 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

  
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  


 
 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





  
 
 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

  
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  

 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

2010-04-14 Thread Chuck Hogg
I have not had a chance to get field experience with the Canopy 430.  I
have a few areas I would like to use it, but am afraid to destroy the
frequency of some of my other 5Ghz backhauls.

Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

Hi Chuck,

Do you have any field review/ deployment info comparison of the new
Canopy 430 ?  I would love to hear some comparison info..

Thanks
Faisal.

On 4/13/2010 10:06 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
 This is what I am in the process of doing now.  We have another 200 
 subs to be converted next month.  Then another 100 subs after that.  
 Not only is it a multiple truck roll incident, but I already paid for 
 the MikroTik gear...and now am replacing customer equipment with
Canopy.
 ROI just got extended an additional 6 months.  We just replaced a 
 complete Trango 900 AP with Canopy 900.  Performance is just better 
 and it scales.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
 On Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:24 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubnt vs Moto vs ... your brand

 Hi,

 Let's keep it simple and easy. With Canopy your system can scale 
 infinitely (due to GPS sync) and latency is always very low and 
 consistent (less than 10ms). With UBNT, you can build a system much 
 cheaper, and one that will probably work in a small, rural area.
 However, it does not scale.

 So, the question you have to ask is: Will your network ever grow to 
 the size that you run out of channels? On a single tower, there are 
 roughly six legal channels in the 5.8ghz band (using 20mhz channel 
 size). None of the other channels are legal with UBNT gear. So you 
 have 6 channels to use for your entire network, and you can't 
 co-locate near adjacent channels, and you can't have two AP's on 
 different towers facing each other on the same channel.

 The problem we made on our network was trying to use Mikrotik for PtMP

 deployments and discovering that it doesn't scale. We ended up having 
 to go to every customer we had installed on two big towers and change 
 them out to Canopy. So we had to roll a truck twice. :(

 Travis
 Microserv


 Glenn Kelley wrote:

 In trying to make the right buying decision - some simple answers may

 help.



 1.  What is the meantime failure rate for your ubiquity equipment

 2.  What is the avg amount of truck rolls per week you run to fix an 
 issue vs the # of customers you have?
 ie- if you have say 1500 clients and do 8 troubleshooting calls a 
 week
  

 then it would be 1500/8 = .0053% )

 3.  how often does a tech call come in (w/o a truck roll) that is 
 equipment related...  For some reason I think some of the ubiquity 
 radios just need a power cycle and voila - they behave much better...
 so - what is the average # of calls per total clients that come in 
 that are fixed w/ simple methods vs a truck roll for the ubiquity 
 users ...



 Moto Users - do you have this info as well:

 Reason I ask is because I am wondering - if the cost of Moto is 
 actually worth it...  as a smaller operator - this information would 
 be most beneficial for sure.

 Buying a Moto radio - even if 2 or 3 times the $$ if - the service 
 calls on the back side are much less - might be worth it.

 Perhaps the cost of Radio vs People (both in manpower as well as 
 client satisfaction for uptime) make the buying decision much 
 easier...  but having some numbers to go along with this would be
  
 great.


 Thanks




  
 --
 --
 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

  
 --
 --
 


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  

 --
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --

 WISPA Wireless List: 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
I was referring to the 10 pack of 27dbi Rick said he couldn't get to work
correctly.  But yes, the others are doing 15v and 24v, however, from the
recommendation of UBNT, 24V is what should be used now, not the 15V.
They've had some issues with the 15V not providing enough power even on
short runs.  

Bob-


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:46 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

5V is only an issue with the Airgridsthe others (Rockets and Nanos ) 
are using 24v or 15v power supplies.
And yes, if you are using the Airgirds, pay attention to the cable run

Faisal.

On 4/14/2010 11:41 AM, Robert West wrote:
 Pay attention to your cable runs as well.  That 5v PoE sucks, I've been
 using variable voltage adapters into a power injector and adjust the
voltage
 depending on how it's acting.  Sometimes, if the voltage is on the low
side
 for the cable run, the unit will power up but act stupid but if I hit it
 with another volt or 2 it behaves.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:34 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com  wrote:

 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird
  
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.comwrote:


 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.
We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles,
we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then
the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes



  


 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

  


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  




 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





  


 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

  


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
It's all getting a bit confusing... I thought it was Forbes who had  
purchased the 10packs of Airgrids and Nanobridges...
To the best of my short re-collection, Rick G has not stated what model 
of M units he was/ is testing...

Regardless, Robert you are correct about the power supplies...

Faisal

On 4/14/2010 11:52 AM, Robert West wrote:
 I was referring to the 10 pack of 27dbi Rick said he couldn't get to work
 correctly.  But yes, the others are doing 15v and 24v, however, from the
 recommendation of UBNT, 24V is what should be used now, not the 15V.
 They've had some issues with the 15V not providing enough power even on
 short runs.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:46 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

 5V is only an issue with the Airgridsthe others (Rockets and Nanos )
 are using 24v or 15v power supplies.
 And yes, if you are using the Airgirds, pay attention to the cable run

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:41 AM, Robert West wrote:

 Pay attention to your cable runs as well.  That 5v PoE sucks, I've been
 using variable voltage adapters into a power injector and adjust the
  
 voltage

 depending on how it's acting.  Sometimes, if the voltage is on the low
  
 side

 for the cable run, the unit will power up but act stupid but if I hit it
 with another volt or 2 it behaves.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:34 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com   wrote:

  
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird


 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets, low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:


  
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.

 We

 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles,

 we

 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then

 the

 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes





  
 

 

  
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



  
 

 

  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





  
  
 

 

  
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


  
  
 

 

  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  




  
 

 

  
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
You correct, my error.  It was Forbes with the AirGrids.  Sometimes
multi-tasking isn't easy!

:)

Bob-



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

It's all getting a bit confusing... I thought it was Forbes who had  
purchased the 10packs of Airgrids and Nanobridges...
To the best of my short re-collection, Rick G has not stated what model 
of M units he was/ is testing...

Regardless, Robert you are correct about the power supplies...

Faisal

On 4/14/2010 11:52 AM, Robert West wrote:
 I was referring to the 10 pack of 27dbi Rick said he couldn't get to work
 correctly.  But yes, the others are doing 15v and 24v, however, from the
 recommendation of UBNT, 24V is what should be used now, not the 15V.
 They've had some issues with the 15V not providing enough power even on
 short runs.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:46 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

 5V is only an issue with the Airgridsthe others (Rockets and Nanos )
 are using 24v or 15v power supplies.
 And yes, if you are using the Airgirds, pay attention to the cable run

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:41 AM, Robert West wrote:

 Pay attention to your cable runs as well.  That 5v PoE sucks, I've been
 using variable voltage adapters into a power injector and adjust the
  
 voltage

 depending on how it's acting.  Sometimes, if the voltage is on the low
  
 side

 for the cable run, the unit will power up but act stupid but if I hit
it
 with another volt or 2 it behaves.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:34 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com   wrote:

  
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird


 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets, low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:


  
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets
and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases,
where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.

 We

 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles,

 we

 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected
at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then

 the

 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in
a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes





  



 

  
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



  



 

  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





  
  



 

  
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


  
  



 

  

Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids

2010-04-14 Thread RickG
Marlon, thats right and this is a major issue with our society today -
everyone is claiming to be watching out for our kids but nobody really
is. Do it for the kids has been the social motto for years now but
when you look at the things being done (or not) it makes your head
swim. I'm not a lawyer, but I dont see any reason that ANY parent
shouldnt have access to ANY and ALL information regarding their minor
children who they are responsible for. Yet, there is a trend of
protecting childrens rights trampling over the parent/child
relationship. Marlon and all parents, you are wise to concerned.
Nobody cares about your kids more than you. I'll go even further that
never before has there been more evil towards our children than now.
We need to call out these people who support this behavior.

off soapbox

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
 If YOU came to me about something your kid was doing on MY system *I* would
 try to help you out as much as I could.

 But then again, I'm not a mega corp either.  To me your kid is more valuable
 than the money I'd loose by running off a few customers.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids


 My soon to be 4 and 7 yo boys have iMacs. They are locked down and
 just do not know about that stuff yet. I removed
 access to the web browser in the PSP cause the oldest found it. He
 does not know how to use it (or so I think). The best
 parents can do these days is be very proactive which you seam to be
 trying to do. I do not know the legalities of monitoring
 a kids device, i leave that up to parents and their lawyers. There are
 key loggers for pretty much everything out there, VPN's
 to make sure the data comes back to you first, and so on. Talk to your
 lawyer. If your child has access to these services from
 another location then I would assume access from there will or has
 been used. Find out if so and who owns it, you might be
 able to access much of that history from there. Also the great way
 back machine and google cache can often have copies of
 peoples pages. Talk with your lawyer. If I came to you and said your
 site had given access to my minor, how would your advisers
 tell you to respond? Likely to fluff me off as fast as possible to
 avoid any liability. It could take a simple request from a letter
 head to get them moving on it, or possibly real threat of legal
 action. Did I mention, talk to your lawyer. S/He will be the best
 source of information for correct surveilla^R^R parenting of digital
 children.


 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
 o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
 Hi All,

 Here's the scenario. My kids are expressly forbidden from having email
 addresses outside my domain. They are forbidden from having myspace,
 facebook etc. sites.

 If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on.

 If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can
 delete things from.

 I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that
 might
 bite them in the butt later. The days of people eventually forgetting the
 stupidity of youth or passion are long gone.

 Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account. He used a hotmail email
 address to get it. He had permission to use neither of them. I finally
 found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd
 been
 saying. His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I
 got
 the password out of him and when I had time to check on it. (I didn't know
 that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net
 and
 work on his page, talk to his friends etc. deep sigh)

 So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the
 deleted
 information. I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had
 no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden
 from me. I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address.

 They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue. However
 they flatly refused to provide me with any information! They had NO
 proof of age etc. on the account. Nothing to verify that the child was
 over
 18 etc. And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account
 information! go get it from your teen is basically what I was told.

 WTF is this??? Absolutly amazing.

 So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids
 these
 days?

 thanks
 marlon



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] Can you get an STD from Ubiquiti Equipment?

2010-04-14 Thread RickG
LOL! That's why they called them Rockets!

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com wrote:
 How could they get damaged? They use this to transport them from Asia: 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawler-transporter

 ryan

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Luthman
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:

 Would you rather something get damaged in shipping?

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:24 PM, can...@believewireless.net 
 p...@believewireless.net wrote:

  Do they really need to wrap every, single part?!?!?!?  Two packages of
  screws are wrapped and place in another
  bag that also holds the mounting clamps.  RocketDishes have the large
  bolts covered and wrapped, placed in
  plastic and zip tied.
 
  I've seen food with less sanitary methods.
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread RickG
Sorry, I want clear. Thats what I get for hijacking the thread :)
I'm not using Rockets - just plain old Bullets  Nanos with regular antennas.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?

 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)

 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com  wrote:

 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird

 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,    low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com    wrote:


 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
. NanoM ? or just plain Nano ?
I have no experience with the plain Nano, but would suggest that you 
visit the UBNT forum and do a bit of pokeing arround, would not be 
surprised if there were firmware related issues...

My playing has only been with the M grear. Their 2x2 MIMO M grear is 
a very different animal...
After having experienced the affects of MIMO in the 802.11n , indoors 
with Ruckus Wireless and now outdoors with the Ubiquity M stuff... it 
is hard to go back and consider 802.11 a/b/g gear... knowing fully well 
that 802.11'n from Ubiquity is 'work in progress'...

It is like getting hooked on  fishing... even a 'bad day' of fishing is 
better that a great day at the office   :)

I cannot wait to see more mfg. come out with 802.11n gear, with 
reasonable pricing ...since, in my personal opinion each of the mfg. 
have their own solid niche points..

Faisal.

On 4/14/2010 12:09 PM, RickG wrote:
 Sorry, I want clear. Thats what I get for hijacking the thread :)
 I'm not using Rockets - just plain old Bullets  Nanos with regular antennas.

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.net  wrote:

 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?

 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)

 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
  
 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.comwrote:


 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird

  
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,  low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com  wrote:



 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



  
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Joe Miller
Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link you 
have there.

Joe Miller
DSLbyAir, LLC
228-831-8881
www.dslbyair.com
- Original Message - 
From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today


Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two NS5Ms 
setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported since 
the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be 
reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both 
directions.

This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56








 This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94










On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:

 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?

 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)

 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com  wrote:

 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird

 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.comwrote:


 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets 
 and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, 
 where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem. 
 We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, 
 we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected 
 at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then 
 the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in 
 a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Jerry Richardson
Damn!

Distance?

Whats the actual TCP/IP throughput on that?



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:59 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two NS5Ms 
setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported since 
the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be reporting 
a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both directions.

This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread AJ
Wish I could get speeds like that :)

Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi away
LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the latest
Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all day long
(I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the link) from
the nearby subdivision...
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Miller joe.mil...@dslbyair.comwrote:

 Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link you
 have there.

 Joe Miller
 DSLbyAir, LLC
 228-831-8881
 www.dslbyair.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today


  Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two
 NS5Ms
 setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported
 since
 the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be
 reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both
 directions.

 This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56




 


 
 
  This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94
 
 
 



 




 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:

  ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
 
  Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
  sports car with all flat tires :)
 
  There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
  bad/defective units
  Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
  little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
  chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
  level or off by a couple of db's..
 
  Faisal.
 
  On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
  Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
  performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
  no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
  radio(s)?
 
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com
  wrote:
 
  Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure
 you
  upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.
 
  Regards
  Michael Baird
 
  I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
  great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
  poor signal, dropped packets,low throughput. Replacing them with
  regular units fix the issue. What gives?
 
  On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
  forbes.me...@wabroadband.comwrote:
 
 
  After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets
  and
  the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
  antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one
 of
  them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases,
  where
  distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.
  We
  just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
  short range backhauls.
 
  Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles,
  we
  set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected
  at
  -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
  Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain
 to
  install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
  Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
  generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then
  the
  WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
  beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in
  a
  pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and
 go
  back to just bullets and Rockets.
 
  Forbes
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Two suggestions...  Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps

other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...

Faisal.

On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:
 Wish I could get speeds like that :)

 Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
 DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi away
 LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the latest
 Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all day long
 (I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the link) from
 the nearby subdivision...
 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Millerjoe.mil...@dslbyair.comwrote:


 Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link you
 have there.

 Joe Miller
 DSLbyAir, LLC
 228-831-8881
 www.dslbyair.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Ihnenos10ru...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today


   Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two
 NS5Ms
 setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported
 since
 the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be
 reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both
 directions.

 This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56




 


  

 This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94






 




 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:

  
 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?

 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)

 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:

 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com
  
   wrote:
  
  
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure

 you
  
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird


 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets, low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:


  
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets
 and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one

 of
  
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases,
 where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.
 We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles,
 we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected
 at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain

 to
  
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then
 the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in
 a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and

 go
  
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes




 
  
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




  
 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Yes, something like this... but in conjunction to the different RSSI, 
you would also see a disparity in the TX/RX link.
reducing the power would end up exaggerating the difference..

Your units don't appear to have this problem... you also are running it 
rather hot at -50  :)
You might consider turning down the power a bit   :)

How far apart are these two units and what is the firmware you are using..

Faisal.

On 4/14/2010 12:59 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
 Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two NS5Ms 
 setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported since 
 the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be 
 reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both 
 directions.

 This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56





 This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94







 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:


 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?

 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)

 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
  
 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com   wrote:


 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird

  
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets, low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:



 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



  
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread RickG
http://ubnt.com/nanostationm
http://ubnt.com/bulletm

I wanna get hooked too. I'm gonna drop UBNT for something else if
they dont improve soon.
Thanks!
-RickG

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
 . NanoM ? or just plain Nano ?
 I have no experience with the plain Nano, but would suggest that you
 visit the UBNT forum and do a bit of pokeing arround, would not be
 surprised if there were firmware related issues...

 My playing has only been with the M grear. Their 2x2 MIMO M grear is
 a very different animal...
 After having experienced the affects of MIMO in the 802.11n , indoors
 with Ruckus Wireless and now outdoors with the Ubiquity M stuff... it
 is hard to go back and consider 802.11 a/b/g gear... knowing fully well
 that 802.11'n from Ubiquity is 'work in progress'...

 It is like getting hooked on  fishing... even a 'bad day' of fishing is
 better that a great day at the office   :)

 I cannot wait to see more mfg. come out with 802.11n gear, with
 reasonable pricing ...since, in my personal opinion each of the mfg.
 have their own solid niche points..

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 12:09 PM, RickG wrote:
 Sorry, I want clear. Thats what I get for hijacking the thread :)
 I'm not using Rockets - just plain old Bullets  Nanos with regular 
 antennas.

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.net  wrote:

 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?

 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)

 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:

 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com    wrote:


 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird


 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,      low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com      wrote:



 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread AJ
I'm on the latest beta firmware...

And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
frustrating...

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:

 Two suggestions...  Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps

 other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:
  Wish I could get speeds like that :)
 
  Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
  DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi
 away
  LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the latest
  Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all day
 long
  (I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the link)
 from
  the nearby subdivision...
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Millerjoe.mil...@dslbyair.com
 wrote:
 
 
  Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link you
  have there.
 
  Joe Miller
  DSLbyAir, LLC
  228-831-8881
  www.dslbyair.com
  - Original Message -
  From: Greg Ihnenos10ru...@gmail.com
  To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today
 
 
Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two
  NS5Ms
  setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported
  since
  the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be
  reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on
 both
  directions.
 
  This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
 
 
  ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
 
  Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
  sports car with all flat tires :)
 
  There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
  bad/defective units
  Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the
 power,
  little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
  chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
  level or off by a couple of db's..
 
  Faisal.
 
  On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
 
  Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
  performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
  no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
  radio(s)?
 
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com
 
wrote:
 
 
  Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure
 
  you
 
  upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.
 
  Regards
  Michael Baird
 
 
  I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
  great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing
 but
  poor signal, dropped packets, low throughput. Replacing them
 with
  regular units fix the issue. What gives?
 
  On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
  forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:
 
 
 
  After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets
  and
  the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
  antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one
 
  of
 
  them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases,
  where
  distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a
 problem.
  We
  just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do
 some
  short range backhauls.
 
  Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2
 miles,
  we
  set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they
 connected
  at
  -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
  Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain
 
  to
 
  install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other
 Nano
  Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
  generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS,
 then
  the
  WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
  beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me
 in
  a
  pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and
 
  go
 
  back to just bullets and Rockets.
 
  Forbes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  

[WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

2010-04-14 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...

Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route.  Traffic 
isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.

Route if you have multiple backhauls to a site.

However, I have heard of WISPs with thousands of subscribers bridging with 
VLANs to do traffic isolation.

Anyone care to share on this topic your experience either way?

I'm considering a change in our routing infrastructure. 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
...And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
frustrating...

But isn't this what the WISP's live for !

:)


Comes with the territory. next time if you feel better about 
swapping out $2000 worth of equipment, call me... I will sell you the 
NS2M for $1000 each...

LOL !!

Faisal.

On 4/14/2010 1:24 PM, AJ wrote:
 I'm on the latest beta firmware...

 And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
 frustrating...

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.netwrote:


 Two suggestions...  Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps

 other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:
  
 Wish I could get speeds like that :)

 Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
 DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi

 away
  
 LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the latest
 Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all day

 long
  
 (I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the link)

 from
  
 the nearby subdivision...
 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Millerjoe.mil...@dslbyair.com
 wrote:



 Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link you
 have there.

 Joe Miller
 DSLbyAir, LLC
 228-831-8881
 www.dslbyair.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Ihnenos10ru...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today


Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two
 NS5Ms
 setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported
 since
 the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be
 reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on
  
 both
  
 directions.

 This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56





  
 
  


  
 This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94







  
 
  



 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:


  
 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?

 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)

 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the

 power,
  
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:


 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com

  
wrote:

  
  
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure


 you

  
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird



 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing
  
 but
  
 poor signal, dropped packets,  low throughput. Replacing them
  
 with
  
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com  wrote:



  
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets
 and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one


 of

  
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases,
 where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a

 problem.
  
 We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do

 some
  
 short range backhauls.

 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2

 miles,
  
 we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they

 connected
  
 at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain


 to

  
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other
   

Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
. Route from Day One. why pickup bad habits bridging .


:)

Faisal

On 4/14/2010 1:27 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
 Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...

 Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route.  Traffic
 isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.

 Route if you have multiple backhauls to a site.

 However, I have heard of WISPs with thousands of subscribers bridging with
 VLANs to do traffic isolation.

 Anyone care to share on this topic your experience either way?

 I'm considering a change in our routing infrastructure.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread AJ
LOL...

We're not exactly a WISP... Just looking for a cheaper solution than running
8000' of fiber to serve a single customer (free customer at that lol)...

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:

 ...And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
 frustrating...

 But isn't this what the WISP's live for !

 :)


 Comes with the territory. next time if you feel better about
 swapping out $2000 worth of equipment, call me... I will sell you the
 NS2M for $1000 each...

 LOL !!

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 1:24 PM, AJ wrote:
  I'm on the latest beta firmware...
 
  And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
  frustrating...
 
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.net
 wrote:
 
 
  Two suggestions...  Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps
 
  other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...
 
  Faisal.
 
  On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:
 
  Wish I could get speeds like that :)
 
  Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
  DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi
 
  away
 
  LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the latest
  Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all day
 
  long
 
  (I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the link)
 
  from
 
  the nearby subdivision...
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Millerjoe.mil...@dslbyair.com
  wrote:
 
 
 
  Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link
 you
  have there.
 
  Joe Miller
  DSLbyAir, LLC
  228-831-8881
  www.dslbyair.com
  - Original Message -
  From: Greg Ihnenos10ru...@gmail.com
  To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today
 
 
 Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are
 two
  NS5Ms
  setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported
  since
  the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be
  reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on
 
  both
 
  directions.
 
  This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi
 -51/-56
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
 
 
 
  ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
 
  Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
  sports car with all flat tires :)
 
  There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
  bad/defective units
  Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the
 
  power,
 
  little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
  chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
  level or off by a couple of db's..
 
  Faisal.
 
  On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
 
 
  Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
  performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater.
 Having
  no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
  radio(s)?
 
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com
 
 
 wrote:
 
 
 
  Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make
 sure
 
 
  you
 
 
  upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.
 
  Regards
  Michael Baird
 
 
 
  I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
  great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing
 
  but
 
  poor signal, dropped packets,  low throughput. Replacing them
 
  with
 
  regular units fix the issue. What gives?
 
  On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
  forbes.me...@wabroadband.com  wrote:
 
 
 
 
  After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M
 Bullets
  and
  the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the
 integrated
  antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not
 one
 
 
  of
 
 
  them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases,
  where
  distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a
 
  problem.
 
  We
  just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do
 
  some
 
  short range backhauls.
 
  Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2
 
  miles,
 
  we
  set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they
 
  connected
 
  at
  -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
  Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the
 mountain
 
 
  to
 
 
  install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other
 
  Nano
 
  Dish no matter whether we used the 

Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

2010-04-14 Thread Gino Villarini
MPLS/VPLS

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:34 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

. Route from Day One. why pickup bad habits bridging .


:)

Faisal

On 4/14/2010 1:27 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
 Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...

 Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route.  Traffic
 isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.

 Route if you have multiple backhauls to a site.

 However, I have heard of WISPs with thousands of subscribers bridging
with
 VLANs to do traffic isolation.

 Anyone care to share on this topic your experience either way?

 I'm considering a change in our routing infrastructure.






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Greg Ihnen
Looks like my images got stripped out. Here's links to the images.

The distance is only about 500 or 600 yards, that's why I have the transmit 
power turned way down.

Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two NS5Ms 
setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported since 
the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be reporting 
a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both directions.

This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56
http://s980.photobucket.com/albums/ae288/takoateli/?action=viewcurrent=Screenshot2010-04-14at122054PM.png

This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94


http://s980.photobucket.com/albums/ae288/takoateli/?action=viewcurrent=Screenshot2010-04-14at121953PM.png
On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:

 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
 
 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a 
 sports car with all flat tires :)
 
 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the 
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power, 
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two 
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal 
 level or off by a couple of db's..
 
 Faisal.
 
 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?
 
 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com  wrote:
 
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.
 
 Regards
 Michael Baird
 
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?
 
 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.comwrote:
 
 
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.
 
 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.
 
 Forbes
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Gino Villarini
If you are using the latest fw, use the airview spectrum analyzer to see
your local noise

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of AJ
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

I'm on the latest beta firmware...

And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
frustrating...

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Faisal Imtiaz
fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:

 Two suggestions...  Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps

 other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:
  Wish I could get speeds like that :)
 
  Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between
a
  DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4
mi
 away
  LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the
latest
  Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all
day
 long
  (I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the
link)
 from
  the nearby subdivision...
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Millerjoe.mil...@dslbyair.com
 wrote:
 
 
  Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a
link you
  have there.
 
  Joe Miller
  DSLbyAir, LLC
  228-831-8881
  www.dslbyair.com
  - Original Message -
  From: Greg Ihnenos10ru...@gmail.com
  To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today
 
 
Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These
are two
  NS5Ms
  setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly
reported
  since
  the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain
be
  reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps
on
 both
  directions.
 
  This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi
-51/-56
 
 
 
 
 



 
 
 
 
  This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



 
 
 
 
  On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
 
 
  ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
 
  Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving
a
  sports car with all flat tires :)
 
  There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify
the
  bad/defective units
  Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the
 power,
  little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the
two
  chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same
signal
  level or off by a couple of db's..
 
  Faisal.
 
  On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
 
  Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
  performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater.
Having
  no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a
bad
  radio(s)?
 
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com
 
wrote:
 
 
  Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make
sure
 
  you
 
  upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the
forums.
 
  Regards
  Michael Baird
 
 
  I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been
working
  great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far,
nothing
 but
  poor signal, dropped packets, low throughput. Replacing
them
 with
  regular units fix the issue. What gives?
 
  On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
  forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:
 
 
 
  After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M
Bullets
  and
  the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the
integrated
  antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids,
not one
 
  of
 
  them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some
cases,
  where
  distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a
 problem.
  We
  just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to
do
 some
  short range backhauls.
 
  Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2
 miles,
  we
  set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they
 connected
  at
  -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
  Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the
mountain
 
  to
 
  install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the
other
 Nano
  Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the
more
  generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the
WDS,
 then
  the
  WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the
unnecessary
  beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain
left me
 in
  a
  pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm 

Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

2010-04-14 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
Opinion #1.

Anybody with large bridged systems?

- Original Message - 
From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use


 . Route from Day One. why pickup bad habits bridging .


 :)

 Faisal

 On 4/14/2010 1:27 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
 Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...

 Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route.  Traffic
 isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.

 Route if you have multiple backhauls to a site.

 However, I have heard of WISPs with thousands of subscribers bridging 
 with
 VLANs to do traffic isolation.

 Anyone care to share on this topic your experience either way?

 I'm considering a change in our routing infrastructure.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
You can also 'swap' them out for Ruckus Wireless Outdoor PTP 'n' Radios..

http://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/zoneflex-high-end/7731

More about $2-2.5K for a pair


Faisal.

On 4/14/2010 1:35 PM, AJ wrote:
 LOL...

 We're not exactly a WISP... Just looking for a cheaper solution than running
 8000' of fiber to serve a single customer (free customer at that lol)...

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.netwrote:


 ...And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
 frustrating...

 But isn't this what the WISP's live for !

 :)


 Comes with the territory. next time if you feel better about
 swapping out $2000 worth of equipment, call me... I will sell you the
 NS2M for $1000 each...

 LOL !!

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 1:24 PM, AJ wrote:
  
 I'm on the latest beta firmware...

 And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
 frustrating...

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.net
 wrote:



 Two suggestions...  Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps

 other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:

  
 Wish I could get speeds like that :)

 Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
 DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi


 away

  
 LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the latest
 Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all day


 long

  
 (I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the link)


 from

  
 the nearby subdivision...
 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Millerjoe.mil...@dslbyair.com
 wrote:




 Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link
  
 you
  
 have there.

 Joe Miller
 DSLbyAir, LLC
 228-831-8881
 www.dslbyair.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Ihnenos10ru...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today


 Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are
  
 two
  
 NS5Ms
 setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported
 since
 the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be
 reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on

  
 both

  
 directions.

 This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi
  
 -51/-56
  





  
  
 
  
  


  
 This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94








  
  
 
  
  


 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:



  
 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?

 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)

 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the


 power,

  
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:



 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater.
  
 Having
  
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com


  
 wrote:


  
  
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make

 sure
  


 you


  
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.

 Regards
 Michael Baird




 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing

  
 but

  
 poor signal, dropped packets,   low throughput. Replacing them

  
 with

  
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?

 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com   wrote:




  
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M

 Bullets
  
 and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the

 integrated
  
 antenna 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Greg Ihnen
It's about 500 to 600 meters. The indicated throughput using the speed test 
tool from the web gui says 65Mbps both directions. But I like the 162 number 
better! : - )

Greg

On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote:

 Damn!
 
 Distance?
 
 Whats the actual TCP/IP throughput on that?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:59 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today
 
 Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two NS5Ms 
 setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported since 
 the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be 
 reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both 
 directions.
 
 This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Greg Ihnen
I'm in the Amazon jungle. Our only noise here is from the sun.

Greg

On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:38 PM, AJ wrote:

 Wish I could get speeds like that :)
 
 Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
 DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi away
 LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the latest
 Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all day long
 (I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the link) from
 the nearby subdivision...
 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Miller joe.mil...@dslbyair.comwrote:
 
 Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link you
 have there.
 
 Joe Miller
 DSLbyAir, LLC
 228-831-8881
 www.dslbyair.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today
 
 
 Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two
 NS5Ms
 setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported
 since
 the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be
 reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both
 directions.
 
 This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
 
 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
 
 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)
 
 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..
 
 Faisal.
 
 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?
 
 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com
 wrote:
 
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure
 you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.
 
 Regards
 Michael Baird
 
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets,low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?
 
 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.comwrote:
 
 
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets
 and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one
 of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases,
 where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.
 We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.
 
 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles,
 we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected
 at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain
 to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then
 the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in
 a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and
 go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.
 
 Forbes
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Greg Ihnen
I'm running the latest beta. Distance is around 500 meters.

I can drop the TX power another 20dbm and the rssi only goes down a few db. 
Right now I dropped it to 7dbm and the rssi only dropped to -55. I'd like to 
get to -65 but I'd have to skew the units and there's so many metal buildings 
here I'm sure I'd get all kinds of reflections. As it is there's all kinds of 
stuff in the fresnel zone.

Greg
On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:

 Yes, something like this... but in conjunction to the different RSSI, 
 you would also see a disparity in the TX/RX link.
 reducing the power would end up exaggerating the difference..
 
 Your units don't appear to have this problem... you also are running it 
 rather hot at -50  :)
 You might consider turning down the power a bit   :)
 
 How far apart are these two units and what is the firmware you are using..
 
 Faisal.
 
 On 4/14/2010 12:59 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
 Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two NS5Ms 
 setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported since 
 the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be 
 reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both 
 directions.
 
 This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56
 
 
 
 
 
 This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
 
 
 ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
 
 Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
 sports car with all flat tires :)
 
 There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
 bad/defective units
 Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
 little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
 chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
 level or off by a couple of db's..
 
 Faisal.
 
 On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
 
 Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
 performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
 no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
 radio(s)?
 
 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com   wrote:
 
 
 Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
 upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.
 
 Regards
 Michael Baird
 
 
 I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
 great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
 poor signal, dropped packets, low throughput. Replacing them with
 regular units fix the issue. What gives?
 
 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
 forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:
 
 
 
 After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets and
 the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
 antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one of
 them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases, where
 distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.  We
 just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
 short range backhauls.
 
 Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2 miles, we
 set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected at
 -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
 Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain to
 install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other Nano
 Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
 generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then the
 WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
 beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me in a
 pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and go
 back to just bullets and Rockets.
 
 Forbes
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

2010-04-14 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
I didn't mean to sound short or rude with this last message.  I mean no 
disrespect.  I've been networking for 25 years... Novell servers, MS, IP 
networks, blah blah blah.

It's just that I expected this response, but I want to INVITE other 
opinions.

- Original Message - 
From: Mark Nash - Lists markl...@uwol.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use


 Opinion #1.

 Anybody with large bridged systems?

 - Original Message - 
 From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use


 . Route from Day One. why pickup bad habits bridging .


 :)

 Faisal

 On 4/14/2010 1:27 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
 Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...

 Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route.  Traffic
 isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.

 Route if you have multiple backhauls to a site.

 However, I have heard of WISPs with thousands of subscribers bridging
 with
 VLANs to do traffic isolation.

 Anyone care to share on this topic your experience either way?

 I'm considering a change in our routing infrastructure.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

2010-04-14 Thread Chuck Hogg
Bridge/VLAN can easily become a nightmare to manage.  I have helped 5+
customers get away from this method...and their management of the
network became easier.

With VLAN's you are not minimizing the broadcast traffic and other
potentials.  This is also a small waste of wireless spectrum.

The only acceptable bridging I would ever do is from client to ap, then
route from there (some client devices don't do routing).  I have about
2-300 clients in this method...and it is still a major pain in the ass
trying to figure out who is who.  We are probably going to move to PPPoE
for those.

Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

Opinion #1.

Anybody with large bridged systems?

- Original Message - 
From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use


 . Route from Day One. why pickup bad habits bridging .


 :)

 Faisal

 On 4/14/2010 1:27 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
 Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...

 Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route.  Traffic
 isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.

 Route if you have multiple backhauls to a site.

 However, I have heard of WISPs with thousands of subscribers bridging

 with
 VLANs to do traffic isolation.

 Anyone care to share on this topic your experience either way?

 I'm considering a change in our routing infrastructure.






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Robert West
Go to the 5ghz version and you'll probably fly!

Bob-


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of AJ
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

Wish I could get speeds like that :)

Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi away
LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the latest
Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all day long
(I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the link) from
the nearby subdivision...
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Miller joe.mil...@dslbyair.comwrote:

 Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link you
 have there.

 Joe Miller
 DSLbyAir, LLC
 228-831-8881
 www.dslbyair.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today


  Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two
 NS5Ms
 setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is being wrongly reported
 since
 the TX/RX is 162/162. If the rssi was for real wouldn't one chain be
 reporting a very low connection speed, right? I'm getting 162Mbps on both
 directions.

 This is one end of backhaul, this NS5M running station wds: rssi -51/-56









 
 
  This is the other NS5M running ap wds: rssi -51/-94
 
 
 










 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:

  ...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
 
  Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
  sports car with all flat tires :)
 
  There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
  bad/defective units
  Testing them , have two units sync/link to each other, reduce the power,
  little bit at a time.. you will see a 6 to 9db difference on the two
  chains (Hpol/Vpol)... normal units will show either the same signal
  level or off by a couple of db's..
 
  Faisal.
 
  On 4/14/2010 11:34 AM, RickG wrote:
  Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
  performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
  no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
  radio(s)?
 
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Bairdm...@tc3net.com
  wrote:
 
  Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure
 you
  upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.
 
  Regards
  Michael Baird
 
  I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
  great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing
but
  poor signal, dropped packets,low throughput. Replacing them with
  regular units fix the issue. What gives?
 
  On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
  forbes.me...@wabroadband.comwrote:
 
 
  After falling in like with the Rocket M Nano's the Rocket M Bullets
  and
  the Mimos I have to say I'm firmly unimpressed with the integrated
  antenna series.  We bought a pack of 10 of the 27dbi grids, not one
 of
  them would associate to our Mimos yet a bullet and in some cases,
  where
  distance wasn't a factor, the Nano Rockets did so without a problem.
  We
  just took delivery on the Nano Dish units, we wanted them to do some
  short range backhauls.
 
  Today was our first, replacing a 10MB Motorola backhaul at 5.2
miles,
  we
  set up the new dishes up in the office WDS on, WPA on they connected
  at
  -50 (as they should in the office), connection firm all night.
  Installed them today, the AP working well we headed up the mountain
 to
  install the other one.  It would not see or connect to the other
Nano
  Dish no matter whether we used the lower powered 5.2 or the more
  generous 5.7/8 frequency range.  Gradually turning off the WDS, then
  the
  WPA, then making it 20 MHZ, finally we gave up and the unnecessary
  beating to my bucket truck that had to climb that mountain left me
in
  a
  pretty foul mood over the new gear.  I'm about to RMA all of it and
 go
  back to just bullets and Rockets.
 
  Forbes
 
 
 



  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 



 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 



  

Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

2010-04-14 Thread Eric Muehleisen
We are primarily a PPPoE shop and run a bridged system for that reason. 
Each AP has it's own VLAN bridged back to the core. We've done this for 
many years without a single issue.

We have different service offerings like VOIP, PPPoE, DHCP, PTPVPN and 
even extend our metro ethernet across our wireless network. VLAN's work 
great for this.

-Eric

On 4/14/2010 1:01 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
 I didn't mean to sound short or rude with this last message.  I mean no
 disrespect.  I've been networking for 25 years... Novell servers, MS, IP
 networks, blah blah blah.

 It's just that I expected this response, but I want to INVITE other
 opinions.

 - Original Message -
 From: Mark Nash - Listsmarkl...@uwol.net
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:39 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use



 Opinion #1.

 Anybody with large bridged systems?

 - Original Message -
 From: Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.net
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use


  
 . Route from Day One. why pickup bad habits bridging .


 :)

 Faisal

 On 4/14/2010 1:27 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:

 Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...

 Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route.  Traffic
 isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.

 Route if you have multiple backhauls to a site.

 However, I have heard of WISPs with thousands of subscribers bridging
 with
 VLANs to do traffic isolation.

 Anyone care to share on this topic your experience either way?

 I'm considering a change in our routing infrastructure.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Gino Villarini
Noisy... the M series are dual pol so they require both polarities to be
clean

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of AJ
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

Here is the upper portion of the band running Airview - it's roughly the
same across the entire 2.3-2.7 band that the NS2M can scan, of course
significantly higher centered on US channels 6 and 11... hopefully the
PDF
flows through correctly...

View from the NS2M at the power supply cabinet (next to the subdivision)
Site Survey
Scanned Frequencies:
2.412GHz 2.417GHz 2.422GHz 2.427GHz 2.432GHz 2.437GHz 2.442GHz 2.447GHz
2.452GHz 2.457GHz 2.462GHz


Scanning, please wait...
  MAC Address SSID Device Name Encryption Signal / Noise, dBm Frequency,
GHz
Channel
  00:21:29:66:C6:D7 MadaWPA2 -63 / -82 2.412 1
  00:23:EE:28:9B:D1 OurMaddieWPA -71 / -82 2.412 1
  00:24:7B:04:FA:66 myqwest6245WPA -67 / -82 2.412 1
  00:19:E4:4C:F9:49 HelloMotoWPA -56 / -82 2.412 1
  00:18:84:81:A2:79 ASGARDWPA2 -76 / -84 2.427 4
  00:19:7D:05:8A:28 My PS3WPA -75 / -85 2.437 6
  00:21:D7:90:80:10 WPA2 -59 / -85 2.437 6
  00:1C:FB:FD:CB:D0 qwestJONESWPA -74 / -84 2.447 8
  00:12:17:62:58:69 HelloMoto2GWPA -68 / -85 2.462 11
  00:15:A3:E5:15:70 Blacklab34WPA -58 / -85 2.462 11
  00:1F:CA:26:F6:C6 WPA2 -20 / -85 2.462 11
  00:21:D7:90:7C:E0 WPA2 -51 / -85 2.462 11
  00:24:7B:14:D6:56 myqwest5589WPA -70 / -85 2.462 11
  00:00:00:00:00:00 WEP -71 / -82 2.412 1
  00:14:A5:30:06:5C MotorolaNONE -70 / -82 2.412 1
  00:22:75:46:BB:D4 Belkin_N_Wireless_46bbd4NONE -72 / -85 2.432 5
  00:21:29:95:3A:67 JohnNONE -81 / -85 2.437 6
  00:21:00:5C:2D:35 HomeWEP -80 / -85 2.437 6
  00:0C:41:96:68:AE linksysWEP -72 / -85 2.437 6
  00:24:B2:76:6A:10 tmobile hotspotWEP -73 / -84 2.447 8
  00:15:05:36:DA:8B ACTIONTECWEP -70 / -84 2.452 9
  00:24:7B:35:A1:54 myqwest4705WEP -63 / -85 2.462 11
  00:00:00:00:00:00 WEP -62 / -85 2.462 11
  00:14:6C:94:B6:00 BarbaraNONE -71 / -85 2.462 11


Scan from the remote employee's house facing the 2 new subdivisions:
Site Survey
Scanned Frequencies:
2.412GHz 2.417GHz 2.422GHz 2.427GHz 2.432GHz 2.437GHz 2.442GHz 2.447GHz
2.452GHz 2.457GHz 2.462GHz


Scanning, please wait...
  MAC Address SSID Device Name Encryption Signal / Noise, dBm Frequency,
GHz
Channel
  00:1B:5B:99:09:A1 OliverWPA -71 / -83 2.412 1
  00:1E:E5:FA:89:97 Less work for meWPA2 -75 / -83 2.412 1
  00:17:3F:57:53:B0 RevelationWPA -60 / -83 2.437 6
  00:22:3F:65:D9:6A MotoxChrisWPA -60 / -83 2.437 6
  00:21:D7:90:80:10 WPA2 -61 / -83 2.437 6
  00:22:3F:A6:E7:85 NETGEARWPA -65 / -81 2.417 2
  00:15:6D:FA:63:85 UBNT-AP  UBNT-AP  WPA2 -62 / -85 2.452 9
  00:23:EE:28:9B:D1 OurMaddieWPA -78 / -83 2.412 1
  00:18:F8:B8:AB:86 19darne57WEP -77 / -83 2.437 6
  00:16:B6:45:69:4D RalphsWEP -71 / -83 2.437 6
  00:13:10:69:BE:A8 linksysNONE -76 / -85 2.422 3
  00:21:29:95:3A:67 JohnNONE -72 / -83 2.437 6



On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
wrote:

 If you are using the latest fw, use the airview spectrum analyzer to
see
 your local noise

 Gino A. Villarini
 g...@aeronetpr.com
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 787.273.4143

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
  Behalf Of AJ
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:24 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

 I'm on the latest beta firmware...

 And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
 frustrating...

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Faisal Imtiaz
 fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:

  Two suggestions...  Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps
 
  other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...
 
  Faisal.
 
  On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:
   Wish I could get speeds like that :)
  
   Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge
between
 a
   DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives
3/4
 mi
  away
   LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the
 latest
   Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all
 day
  long
   (I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the
 link)
  from
   the nearby subdivision...
   On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe
Millerjoe.mil...@dslbyair.com
  wrote:
  
  
   Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a
 link you
   have there.
  
   Joe Miller
   DSLbyAir, LLC
   228-831-8881
   www.dslbyair.com
   - Original Message -
   From: Greg Ihnenos10ru...@gmail.com
   To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
   Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
   Subject: Re: 

Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Hey AJ.

I am curious.

Turn on Airmax.
Reduce Channel size to 10mhz  or 5mhz

And see if things improve...

Faisal.

On 4/14/2010 2:09 PM, AJ wrote:
 Here is the upper portion of the band running Airview - it's roughly the
 same across the entire 2.3-2.7 band that the NS2M can scan, of course
 significantly higher centered on US channels 6 and 11... hopefully the PDF
 flows through correctly...

 View from the NS2M at the power supply cabinet (next to the subdivision)
 Site Survey
 Scanned Frequencies:
 2.412GHz 2.417GHz 2.422GHz 2.427GHz 2.432GHz 2.437GHz 2.442GHz 2.447GHz
 2.452GHz 2.457GHz 2.462GHz


 Scanning, please wait...
MAC Address SSID Device Name Encryption Signal / Noise, dBm Frequency, GHz
 Channel
00:21:29:66:C6:D7 MadaWPA2 -63 / -82 2.412 1
00:23:EE:28:9B:D1 OurMaddieWPA -71 / -82 2.412 1
00:24:7B:04:FA:66 myqwest6245WPA -67 / -82 2.412 1
00:19:E4:4C:F9:49 HelloMotoWPA -56 / -82 2.412 1
00:18:84:81:A2:79 ASGARDWPA2 -76 / -84 2.427 4
00:19:7D:05:8A:28 My PS3WPA -75 / -85 2.437 6
00:21:D7:90:80:10 WPA2 -59 / -85 2.437 6
00:1C:FB:FD:CB:D0 qwestJONESWPA -74 / -84 2.447 8
00:12:17:62:58:69 HelloMoto2GWPA -68 / -85 2.462 11
00:15:A3:E5:15:70 Blacklab34WPA -58 / -85 2.462 11
00:1F:CA:26:F6:C6 WPA2 -20 / -85 2.462 11
00:21:D7:90:7C:E0 WPA2 -51 / -85 2.462 11
00:24:7B:14:D6:56 myqwest5589WPA -70 / -85 2.462 11
00:00:00:00:00:00 WEP -71 / -82 2.412 1
00:14:A5:30:06:5C MotorolaNONE -70 / -82 2.412 1
00:22:75:46:BB:D4 Belkin_N_Wireless_46bbd4NONE -72 / -85 2.432 5
00:21:29:95:3A:67 JohnNONE -81 / -85 2.437 6
00:21:00:5C:2D:35 HomeWEP -80 / -85 2.437 6
00:0C:41:96:68:AE linksysWEP -72 / -85 2.437 6
00:24:B2:76:6A:10 tmobile hotspotWEP -73 / -84 2.447 8
00:15:05:36:DA:8B ACTIONTECWEP -70 / -84 2.452 9
00:24:7B:35:A1:54 myqwest4705WEP -63 / -85 2.462 11
00:00:00:00:00:00 WEP -62 / -85 2.462 11
00:14:6C:94:B6:00 BarbaraNONE -71 / -85 2.462 11


 Scan from the remote employee's house facing the 2 new subdivisions:
 Site Survey
 Scanned Frequencies:
 2.412GHz 2.417GHz 2.422GHz 2.427GHz 2.432GHz 2.437GHz 2.442GHz 2.447GHz
 2.452GHz 2.457GHz 2.462GHz


 Scanning, please wait...
MAC Address SSID Device Name Encryption Signal / Noise, dBm Frequency, GHz
 Channel
00:1B:5B:99:09:A1 OliverWPA -71 / -83 2.412 1
00:1E:E5:FA:89:97 Less work for meWPA2 -75 / -83 2.412 1
00:17:3F:57:53:B0 RevelationWPA -60 / -83 2.437 6
00:22:3F:65:D9:6A MotoxChrisWPA -60 / -83 2.437 6
00:21:D7:90:80:10 WPA2 -61 / -83 2.437 6
00:22:3F:A6:E7:85 NETGEARWPA -65 / -81 2.417 2
00:15:6D:FA:63:85 UBNT-AP  UBNT-AP  WPA2 -62 / -85 2.452 9
00:23:EE:28:9B:D1 OurMaddieWPA -78 / -83 2.412 1
00:18:F8:B8:AB:86 19darne57WEP -77 / -83 2.437 6
00:16:B6:45:69:4D RalphsWEP -71 / -83 2.437 6
00:13:10:69:BE:A8 linksysNONE -76 / -85 2.422 3
00:21:29:95:3A:67 JohnNONE -72 / -83 2.437 6



 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Gino Villarinig...@aeronetpr.com  wrote:


 If you are using the latest fw, use the airview spectrum analyzer to see
 your local noise

 Gino A. Villarini
 g...@aeronetpr.com
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 787.273.4143

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
   Behalf Of AJ
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:24 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

 I'm on the latest beta firmware...

 And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
 frustrating...

 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Faisal Imtiaz
 fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:

  
 Two suggestions...  Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps

 other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:

 Wish I could get speeds like that :)

 Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between
  
 a
  
 DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4
  
 mi
  
 away

 LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the
  
 latest
  
 Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all
  
 day
  
 long

 (I can see 26 different consumer routers from both sides of the
  
 link)
  
 from

 the nearby subdivision...
 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Joe Millerjoe.mil...@dslbyair.com
 wrote:


  
 Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a

 link you
  
 have there.

 Joe Miller
 DSLbyAir, LLC
 228-831-8881
 www.dslbyair.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Greg Ihnenos10ru...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no 

Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use

2010-04-14 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
Eric, how many clients / tower sites / APs are you serving this way?

Do you expect it to scale to double/triple your size now?

- Original Message - 
From: Eric Muehleisen ericm...@gmail.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use


 We are primarily a PPPoE shop and run a bridged system for that reason.
 Each AP has it's own VLAN bridged back to the core. We've done this for
 many years without a single issue.

 We have different service offerings like VOIP, PPPoE, DHCP, PTPVPN and
 even extend our metro ethernet across our wireless network. VLAN's work
 great for this.

 -Eric

 On 4/14/2010 1:01 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
 I didn't mean to sound short or rude with this last message.  I mean no
 disrespect.  I've been networking for 25 years... Novell servers, MS, IP
 networks, blah blah blah.

 It's just that I expected this response, but I want to INVITE other
 opinions.

 - Original Message -
 From: Mark Nash - Listsmarkl...@uwol.net
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:39 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use



 Opinion #1.

 Anybody with large bridged systems?

 - Original Message -
 From: Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.net
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use



 . Route from Day One. why pickup bad habits bridging .


 :)

 Faisal

 On 4/14/2010 1:27 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:

 Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...

 Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route.  Traffic
 isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.

 Route if you have multiple backhauls to a site.

 However, I have heard of WISPs with thousands of subscribers bridging
 with
 VLANs to do traffic isolation.

 Anyone care to share on this topic your experience either way?

 I'm considering a change in our routing infrastructure.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today

2010-04-14 Thread AJ
Current stable setup is Airmax on, 10 Mhz channel, freq 2417 (channel 2).

Noise floor varies -96 to -83 dBm
Signal RX from station -59 to -67
TX/RX 13 Mbps
CCQ 100%

Speedtest shows 2.88 Mbps RX, 1.94 Mbps TX

Airmax turned off

Noise floor varies -96 to -85 dBm
Signal RX from station -60
ACK 51
TX/RX 13 MBps
CCQ 100%

Speedtest shows 2.66 Mbps RX, 3.26 Mbps TX

Changed both stations to 1 mile/Auto ACK and now sitting stable at about 3.0
Mbps TX/RX after half dozen tests...



On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:

 Hey AJ.

 I am curious.

 Turn on Airmax.
 Reduce Channel size to 10mhz  or 5mhz

 And see if things improve...

 Faisal.

 On 4/14/2010 2:09 PM, AJ wrote:
  Here is the upper portion of the band running Airview - it's roughly the
  same across the entire 2.3-2.7 band that the NS2M can scan, of course
  significantly higher centered on US channels 6 and 11... hopefully the
 PDF
  flows through correctly...
 
  View from the NS2M at the power supply cabinet (next to the subdivision)
  Site Survey
  Scanned Frequencies:
  2.412GHz 2.417GHz 2.422GHz 2.427GHz 2.432GHz 2.437GHz 2.442GHz 2.447GHz
  2.452GHz 2.457GHz 2.462GHz
 
 
  Scanning, please wait...
 MAC Address SSID Device Name Encryption Signal / Noise, dBm Frequency,
 GHz
  Channel
 00:21:29:66:C6:D7 MadaWPA2 -63 / -82 2.412 1
 00:23:EE:28:9B:D1 OurMaddieWPA -71 / -82 2.412 1
 00:24:7B:04:FA:66 myqwest6245WPA -67 / -82 2.412 1
 00:19:E4:4C:F9:49 HelloMotoWPA -56 / -82 2.412 1
 00:18:84:81:A2:79 ASGARDWPA2 -76 / -84 2.427 4
 00:19:7D:05:8A:28 My PS3WPA -75 / -85 2.437 6
 00:21:D7:90:80:10 WPA2 -59 / -85 2.437 6
 00:1C:FB:FD:CB:D0 qwestJONESWPA -74 / -84 2.447 8
 00:12:17:62:58:69 HelloMoto2GWPA -68 / -85 2.462 11
 00:15:A3:E5:15:70 Blacklab34WPA -58 / -85 2.462 11
 00:1F:CA:26:F6:C6 WPA2 -20 / -85 2.462 11
 00:21:D7:90:7C:E0 WPA2 -51 / -85 2.462 11
 00:24:7B:14:D6:56 myqwest5589WPA -70 / -85 2.462 11
 00:00:00:00:00:00 WEP -71 / -82 2.412 1
 00:14:A5:30:06:5C MotorolaNONE -70 / -82 2.412 1
 00:22:75:46:BB:D4 Belkin_N_Wireless_46bbd4NONE -72 / -85 2.432 5
 00:21:29:95:3A:67 JohnNONE -81 / -85 2.437 6
 00:21:00:5C:2D:35 HomeWEP -80 / -85 2.437 6
 00:0C:41:96:68:AE linksysWEP -72 / -85 2.437 6
 00:24:B2:76:6A:10 tmobile hotspotWEP -73 / -84 2.447 8
 00:15:05:36:DA:8B ACTIONTECWEP -70 / -84 2.452 9
 00:24:7B:35:A1:54 myqwest4705WEP -63 / -85 2.462 11
 00:00:00:00:00:00 WEP -62 / -85 2.462 11
 00:14:6C:94:B6:00 BarbaraNONE -71 / -85 2.462 11
 
 
  Scan from the remote employee's house facing the 2 new subdivisions:
  Site Survey
  Scanned Frequencies:
  2.412GHz 2.417GHz 2.422GHz 2.427GHz 2.432GHz 2.437GHz 2.442GHz 2.447GHz
  2.452GHz 2.457GHz 2.462GHz
 
 
  Scanning, please wait...
 MAC Address SSID Device Name Encryption Signal / Noise, dBm Frequency,
 GHz
  Channel
 00:1B:5B:99:09:A1 OliverWPA -71 / -83 2.412 1
 00:1E:E5:FA:89:97 Less work for meWPA2 -75 / -83 2.412 1
 00:17:3F:57:53:B0 RevelationWPA -60 / -83 2.437 6
 00:22:3F:65:D9:6A MotoxChrisWPA -60 / -83 2.437 6
 00:21:D7:90:80:10 WPA2 -61 / -83 2.437 6
 00:22:3F:A6:E7:85 NETGEARWPA -65 / -81 2.417 2
 00:15:6D:FA:63:85 UBNT-AP  UBNT-AP  WPA2 -62 / -85 2.452 9
 00:23:EE:28:9B:D1 OurMaddieWPA -78 / -83 2.412 1
 00:18:F8:B8:AB:86 19darne57WEP -77 / -83 2.437 6
 00:16:B6:45:69:4D RalphsWEP -71 / -83 2.437 6
 00:13:10:69:BE:A8 linksysNONE -76 / -85 2.422 3
 00:21:29:95:3A:67 JohnNONE -72 / -83 2.437 6
 
 
 
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Gino Villarinig...@aeronetpr.com
  wrote:
 
 
  If you are using the latest fw, use the airview spectrum analyzer to see
  your local noise
 
  Gino A. Villarini
  g...@aeronetpr.com
  Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
  787.273.4143
 
  -Original Message-
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of AJ
  Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:24 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today
 
  I'm on the latest beta firmware...
 
  And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
  frustrating...
 
  On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Faisal Imtiaz
  fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:
 
 
  Two suggestions...  Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps
 
  other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...
 
  Faisal.
 
  On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:
 
  Wish I could get speeds like that :)
 
  Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between
 
  a
 
  DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4
 
  mi
 
  away
 
  LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the
 
  latest
 
  Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor bounces around -85 to -80 all
 
  day
 
  long
 
 

  1   2   >