[xmail] Re: dkim
Ok, Anyone experience with this already? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Mike Harrington Verzonden: donderdag 24 mei 2007 8:55 Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: dkim I think Davide would say, Write a filter if you want it. - Original Message -=20 From: Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:54 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: dkim =20 Yes there it is. Another way to battle spam. Ofcourse the question is, will xmail support this and when will it be planned. =20 http://dkim.org/ =20 regards, =20 Wim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: dkim
Yes there it is. Another way to battle spam. Ofcourse the question is, will xmail support this and when will it be planned. http://dkim.org/ regards, Wim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
Unfortunatly this does nog seem to work :( Any other ideas? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens OKI Miyuki Verzonden: maandag 7 mei 2007 3:24 Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows Hi, Wim Is it possible to get xmail to work on Windows 2003 64 bits? If I try the 32 bit version it fails. Some errors I retrieved from the eventlog: The 32 bit version's application refers REGISTRY under HKLM\Software\Wow6432Node on 64bits Windows. Try to write setting under HKLM\Software\Wow6432Node\GNU\XMail instead. Cheers, OKI - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
Hi, What do you need and how do I get it? I currently only have what the eventviewer says.=20 Wim -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Davide Libenzi Verzonden: dinsdag 8 mei 2007 8:20 Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows On Tue, 8 May 2007, Wim Verveen wrote: Unfortunatly this does nog seem to work :( =20 Any other ideas? Any more debug info available? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20 Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.5/792 - Release Date: 6-5-2007 21:01 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
I don't see a missing dll error.=20
The only significant item in eventvwr seems to be:
Error in function {stat}
If I start xmail from the commandprompt using the --debug option it just
quits. After these message:
Debugging XMail Server.
Error in function {stat}
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Namens Davide Libenzi
Verzonden: dinsdag 8 mei 2007 19:04
Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
On Tue, 8 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you kidding? Where in the xmail docs does it say that?
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#build
If once you run the XMail binaries, Windows complain about missing
DLLs,=20
your system is probably missing the Microsoft CRT redistributable=20
package, that you can download here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/vcredist_x86.exe
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.5/793 - Release Date: 7-5-2007
14:55
=20
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
Interesting, it does start now. Haven't tested any functions yet but it
does not crash the way it did.
Maybe there is a problem reading the registry on a 64 bit machine?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Namens Davide Libenzi
Verzonden: woensdag 9 mei 2007 0:09
Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Wim Verveen wrote:
I don't see a missing dll error.=3D20
=20
The only significant item in eventvwr seems to be:
Error in function {stat}
=20
If I start xmail from the commandprompt using the --debug option it
just
quits. After these message:
Debugging XMail Server.
Error in function {stat}
Can you try to pass the MAIL_ROOT directly in the command line?
C: XMail --debug -Md -Ms MAIL_ROOT ...
MAIL_ROOT =3D XMail root directory
. =3D Other args you may want to pass
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
I think I found the cause. Somewhere during the initial troubleshooting
we created the xmail regkey in the following place:
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\GNU\XMail=09
Unfortunatly the original key was correct but the one in this location
wasn't and that's where xmail actually gets it's info from. Thanx davide
for your info, It did help me to re-troiubleshoot the registry. I used
regmon for this which is a perfect tool for this kind of thing. The
service does start now and does accept connection I will now check if
all my filters and other fancy stuff work.=20
Thank you all for assisting on this.
Wim=09
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Namens Davide Libenzi
Verzonden: woensdag 9 mei 2007 0:09
Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Wim Verveen wrote:
I don't see a missing dll error.=3D20
=20
The only significant item in eventvwr seems to be:
Error in function {stat}
=20
If I start xmail from the commandprompt using the --debug option it
just
quits. After these message:
Debugging XMail Server.
Error in function {stat}
Can you try to pass the MAIL_ROOT directly in the command line?
C: XMail --debug -Md -Ms MAIL_ROOT ...
MAIL_ROOT =3D XMail root directory
. =3D Other args you may want to pass
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] xmail on 64 bit Windows
Hi,
Is it possible to get xmail to work on Windows 2003 64 bits? If I try
the 32 bit version it fails. Some errors I retrieved from the eventlog:
Error in function {stat}
StartServiceCtrlDispatcher}: The service process could not connect to
the service controller. (0x427).
Any way to get it to work?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Reboot via email
That would be easy, a filter with vbscript which detects the email (if you need an example there is at least one vbscript word filter which you might want to use). Inside the VMS you could either use WMI to perform the reboot or just shell out to shutdown.exe Wim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edmonds, J.B. Sent: vrijdag 29 september 2006 15:01 To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Reboot via email Sometime ago (maybe May) there was a thread concerning rebooting a Windows server via email. I deleted the items but now have an interest in doing this. Did anyone get a reliable method working? JB - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Reboot via email
You might not want to reboot a server by email But some way of verification would be nice, we don't want to have spammers reboot the server! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: vrijdag 29 september 2006 15:48 To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Reboot via email On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Wim Verveen wrote: That would be easy, a filter with vbscript which detects the email (if you need an example there is at least one vbscript word filter which you might want to use). Inside the VMS you could either use WMI to perform the reboot or just shell out to shutdown.exe You might want to sign+verify that message in your filter though ;) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] increase timeout
Suppose I have a backup mailserver and i want it to hold the mail until the primary comes up. How do I do this? After 12 hours or so it starts to bounce the mails Any ideas? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AW: Re: Subscription confirmation e-mail has a bug
I think I observed something like this also. But not with registering but with sending to the list, maybe because of a signed email. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 16 maart 2006 7:25 Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org Onderwerp: [xmail] AW: Re: Subscription confirmation e-mail has a bug Hello Davide, -part of original message- from: Davide Libenzi sentt: Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 20:37 to: xmail@xmailserver.org subject: [xmail] Re: Subscription confirmation e-mail has a bug Since there are quite a few hundreds of users subscribed to this list, might not be that the problem is somehow your? ;) I am not sure, I am using only standard software in an standard configuration : windows XP Professional and outlook. Maybe most of the users in this newsgroup are unix-user and maybe did not encounter this problem, perhaps it is due to the different handling of the 'end of line' in unix and winows. Besides that it was easy to find a workaround, so maybe only non of the other windowsusers complained or gave up without getting confirmation. I got following e-mail: # [EMAIL PROTECTED] has requested that you be subscribed xmail mailing list. # # To subscribe, reply to this message, leaving the message body # intact, or send the following lines in e-mail to # [EMAIL PROTECTED]: // job appsub xmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ 4417A8E3:345F.1:kznvy // eoj --- Ecartis v1.0.0 - job execution complete. I just replied to this without any changes in the body, since I used copy and paste I don't know if windows changed the end of line caracters Then I got following reply: appsub xmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4417A8E3:345F.1:kznvy // Invalid number of parameters. eoj Unknown command. --- Ecartis v1.0.0 - job execution complete. Itried to send: // job appsub xmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ 4417A8E3:345F.1:kznvy // eoj I got the same reply Then I tried: // job appsub xmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ 4417A8E3:345F.1:kznvy // eoj And I was accepted Beye chriwi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Problem with charsets
)Ú¯/îË©¦íy×âë-®*iyÖòÆ«¶+ʦbq«b¢ñ¦G,îh¦xX¥zÉ¢ê{:.˱Êâmçë¢kaÉb²Û ÛazX§zéì¹» ®ÞÆf¢)í
æèw* jg¬±¨ ¶j»b³[ ®÷«¢¸¢¸ êÚ¥¦Ç§vØ^)Þ
éi{ayº ÊÚë,j¡ç®Ø¬Æf¢Ç«½êè®
[xmail] POP3 external account sync
What I want to do is the is the following: 1. Let xmail retrieve email from an external pop3 account containing all the mail send to a particular domain 2. Forward it with smtp to a mailserver containing the mailboxes from this domain I know there are better ways to relay email, this is a very particular case which cannot be solved another way at this time Any ideas to make this work? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get delivered
I would be interested to know, I can't imagine one -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens John Kielkopf Verzonden: dinsdag 30 augustus 2005 17:50 Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get delivered We used to run Xmail on windows with MS DNS for some time. I don't recall ever having this problem. Shiloh Jennings wrote: We run XMail on Windows, but we use Bind on Windows instead of Microsoft DNS. I do not think we have had any problems with yahoo and hotmail. Were the people seeing this problem using Microsoft DNS or BIND? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Buehler Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:05 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get delivered I remember this topic too. The only thing I thought strange at the time, and still do, is that many users of 1.21 are not affected by this problem at all (myself being an example), and so there must be something related in the systems of those who do have the problem. I am not saying any of these things are the cause (I have no idea) but I remember thinking that many (all?) were running Windows Systems and that many were coming from outside the U.S.. Perhaps the problem is with the Windows binary, or the way it interacts with Microsoft DNS? Maybe there is something else related? It seems to me it might be helpful if people with this problem published relevant system data so that we can see what the commonalities are to isolate the problem... just a thought. Jeff Edinilson J. Santos wrote: I'm using the same solution that Francis described without problems. Try to search in the list about this topic. I'm the first that related it few months ago. Edinilson - ATINET-Professional Web Hosting Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876 http://www.atinet.com.br - Original Message - From: CLEMENT Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:22 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get delivered This problem was previously reported on this mailing list. Seems (but not completly clarified/debugged at this time) 'xmail 1.21' have some problems with some 'domains' zones setup (hotmail and yahoo in most cases). Seems xmail or dns server or tcp stack ? finaly choose the domain A record and not the MX record for the domain in some cases ! even if a nslookup or dig get the correct response ... I had the same problem, and configured xmail to allways use a smtp gateway (a iis smtp server on another computer using the same dns server for final delivery !!) to temporary resolve sending to these domains (especialy hotmail ...) So, if you isp provide you a smtp gateway, tell xmail to deliver to it and let the isp smtp server do the job. Put this line in smtpfwd.tab (replace a.b.c.d with you isp smtp server) : * a.b.c.d:25 As I said previously I have to get some tcp dumps to help understand the problem when xmail resolves by itself on these domains but my xmail server is in 'production' (for customers) and i can't test with it for this delivery problem so I need to find time to run another server on another 'dummy' domain ... Francis -Message d'origine- De : David Lord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy : mardi 30 aot 2005 12:33 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get delivered On 29 Aug 2005, at 3:33, jonn ah wrote: Hi all, we're using xmail's pop3 and smtp service but when we try to send messages to either yahoo or hotmail, the messages does not seem to get delivered...Is there a default blacklist list that xmail automatically throws out messages to yahoo or hotmail to /dev/null? using tail -f /var/log/messages gives me nothing...I can however, send to other domains without any problems... any ideas? thanks! Possibly they both have tighter requirements on sender authentication, RDNS, SPF etc. David - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.14/79 - Release Date: 22-8-2005 -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.14/79 - Release Date: 22-8-2005 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Special characters in emails
Slightly offtopic, but does anybody know where is described how an email = with any special characters like =FC and =DF should be constructed. = Webforms seem to have trouble with generating an email which correctly = transmits these characters. TIA Wim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Special characters in emails
But then agains sometimes we do. I just notices also that the ones I put into my post are not readable sent through this list. Anywau, think greek, german the special characters those languages have.=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Alexander Hagenah Verzonden: donderdag 9 juni 2005 13:05 Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Special characters in emails =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Thursday, June 09, 2005 12:59 PM: =20 Slightly offtopic, but does anybody know where is described how an=20 email =3D3D with any special characters like =3D3DFC and =3D3DDF=20 should be =3D constructed. Webforms seem to have trouble with generating an email=20 which correctly=20 =3D3D transmits these characters. =20 RFC821 says: ..-- | The mail data may contain any of the 128 ASCII character codes. `-- =20 So - don't use *special* cahracters. ;) =20 -- =20 Regards, Alexander Hagenah - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Disable mail loop eventlog entries
I agree. Critical should only be reserved for the really really important events. Most events can suffice with a warning. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Michal Altair Valasek Verzonden: dinsdag 31 mei 2005 16:46 Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org; IMB Recipient 1 Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Disable mail loop eventlog entries =20 Hello, =20 | Can I suggest to be warning, not 'error' nor 'information'=20 | .. I think it's more appropriate ... =20 according to Windows architecture, the recommended meaning of=20 events is that: =20 Error is a critical failure, which disrupts (or most likely=20 will disrupt) normal operation of server. Administrator's=20 attention is required as soon as possible. =20 Warning is a non-critical failure, which did not caused any=20 widespread problems, but still requires administrator's attention. =20 Information is a notification about certain event, which is=20 part of normal operation. Situation was resolved the expected=20 way and no administrator's attention is required. =20 IMHO, what's most important is the factor of administrator's=20 attention. Mail loops (when resolved) are semi-normal part of=20 mail server operation and mail server is expected to deal=20 with them. I, as administrator, can do virtually nothing to=20 solve the situation - especially at time when the message is=20 written to log. =20 I agree that this event should be logged somewhere, to help=20 diagnostics, but I would prefer it to be information only. =20 -- Michal A. Valasek - Altair Communications | Microsoft ASP.NET=20 MVP PGP 0xC4F3579D | www.altaircom.net | www.rider.cz |=20 www.aspnet.cz Keeping freedom safe from democracy =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 =20 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.0 - Release Date: 30-5-2005 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Special character problem?
I received a complained where people could not reply to a message they = received because the reply field seemed empty in their mail client. = Appearently the people who sent these mails have special characters in = their names like 'L=E9on'. If I look at the headers I receive in xmail it looks like this: From: = =3D?WINDOWS-1252?Q?=3D22user=3D2C_L=3D2E_=3D28L=3DE9on=3D29=3D22?=3D=20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This seems like a very strange from field, but is this caused by xmail = or 'the other end' ? Wim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Special character problem?
Ok thanx for that answer. The other party is basically blaming xmail for the problem. I will try a reproduction scenario which actually works as proof it is their problem Wim -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Gerald V. Livingston II Verzonden: maandag 2 augustus 2004 11:00 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Special character problem? On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:55:25 +0200 Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: =3D =3D3D?WINDOWS-1252?Q?=3D3D22user=3D3D2C_L=3D3D2E_=3D3D28L=3D3DE9on=3D3D29= =3D3D22?=3D3D=3D20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 This seems like a very strange from field, but is this caused by xmail =3D or 'the other end' ? =20 Wim Something along the line, probably a webmail client, is HTML encoding the European extended characters. =3DE9 or %E9 is a lower case acute letter 'e' (the letter 'e' with a tick above it leaning to the right, ASCII #233). Your From: line above reads something like this (starting after the ?Q?):=20 user'_L._(Leon) [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the e in Leon actually being an e-acute. It's been run through the conversion more than once so it's REALLY screwed up. It's not XMail doing it. Gerald - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: get a handle on Sober.H spam ?
=20 1) Getting a static IP address from their provider so that you can whitelist the address 2) Getting non-generic RDNS assigned by their provider [...] Of course 1. and 2. are not feasible for about 99% of broadband users who want to run a legitimate mail server. Static address and RDNS is out of the question (an ISP usually charges a busisness rate for this) It is free with my provider. I know others where it is the same overhere. Certainly not 99% then. And soon you will have no choice if you want any mail send. Some providers over here already block port 25 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: virus database
Luckily I am located in the same country as this particular list. It seems to get better though. I do agree that to work better the list needs more input both locally and around the world. wim=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Goesta Smekal Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juni 2004 9:25 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: virus database =20 On [Mon, 07.06. 08:05], alex wrote: =20 On Jun 7, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Wim Verveen wrote: =20 I am actually trying this out. It doesn't catch a lot until now.=20 Maybe the database needs to grow or more 'points of=20 measurement' are needed? I think they need more points of measurement, the database doesnt=20 really grow because they are only scanning mails on their own=20 mailserver, and they drop ip's after 24h. =20 The main problem of a central database on infected hosts is,=20 that today's malware has a strong local spreading character. =20 let me put it another way to become clear: as far as I can=20 tell about 95% of virus senders come from the same TLD (in=20 our case .at). This is a consequence of the way e-Mail=20 addresses are collected. =20 So such a Blacklist automatically gets a strong local bias an=20 can never possibly contain a reasonable amount of worldwide=20 scum hosts. Except someone puts up a central DB fed by people=20 all 'round the Net. =20 Goesta =20 -- Wiener Hilfswerk - EDV 1072 Wien, Schottenfeldgasse 29 Tel: 512 36 61 DW 407 / Fax 512 36 61 33 =20 -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- =20 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) =20 iQEVAwUBQMlePuEKFiIqAG4fAQL9KQgAqJO3+8vLwiBiD7rS53xEB1JUlXL274Uz jfTkMil8nYJ76HRdEpVR/m0tkXCiD/8/cz1gmgdIb3GpOeaT8Ltm5hPpD22mKags h/bDEDs0pi9flk60bOGdpDc4qyv9yq1Ada/AZmD1/yCwHFoVlOgI2114ypOu6gQj CADKCJsYwZA6rcdFQqhJ0c/AYC32JnBaR5F4rDimJsnwIq47ussGUlVQAJ0KsMVx 7bChcTeiG9buziBr7oiwkGQCe70L4/R4uzJxXApNmw1DkgOKxJp+db8+++6Zinq0 HnGVMCmP+yXGYSs40DbM3cbym8reVsMUlDf+iyyy3oNMDs6BrZyqlg=3D=3D =3D90It -END PGP SIGNATURE- =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: virus database
It does however work, I was 'attacked' by a few infected machines sending multiple viruses per second. Now it is all nice and quite. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens alex Verzonden: maandag 7 juni 2004 8:05 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: virus database On Jun 7, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Wim Verveen wrote: I am actually trying this out. It doesn't catch a lot until now. Maybe the database needs to grow or more 'points of measurement' are needed? I think they need more points of measurement, the database doesnt=20 really grow because they are only scanning mails on their own mailserver, and they drop=20 ip's after 24h. --=20 alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: virus database
I am actually trying this out. It doesn't catch a lot until now. Maybe the database needs to grow or more 'points of measurement' are needed? Wim=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens alex Verzonden: donderdag 3 juni 2004 14:11 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] virus database =20 Hi all, =20 I don't know if this is offtopic, in that case: i'm sorry :) =20 bit.nl (a dutch provider) started to put ip-addresses from=20 emailing virusinfected computers in a database. I thought=20 this might be useful for people fighting spam :) =20 more info: http://virbl.bit.nl/ =20 -- alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: virus database
Actually some ISP's like xs4all in the Netherlands will block a company network because of that -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens chabral Verzonden: donderdag 3 juni 2004 14:58 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: virus database they can also be pc's on a corporate network going out to the internet by a server o firewall doing nat/pat, so it will be blocking some corporations too. chabral alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Servitel srl - Roberto Pavesi wrote: This is a CRAZY idea ! In a few time you have banned 50% or more of internet traffic ! alex wrote: more info: http://virbl.bit.nl/ the internettraffic you're talking about are home pc's sending viruses not mailservers. isp mailserver are whitelisted so won't get on the list anyway. -- alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: virus database
I don't mind blocking an address which is sending out viruses since sober.g flooded my net with thousands of viruses a day. If this list is working I will be using it. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Leonardo Cabral Verzonden: donderdag 3 juni 2004 16:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: virus database we have a big world with millions of internet users, no? well, here in argentina thats very common. The isp gives an internet access and each company uses it as it likes, for example, giving his lan internet access via a router/linux doing nat/pat. we don't must loose the point that there are thousands of isp in the world, and each one handle their clients in their way. no? Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually some ISP's like xs4all in the Netherlands will block a company network because of that -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens chabral Verzonden: donderdag 3 juni 2004 14:58 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: virus database they can also be pc's on a corporate network going out to the internet by a server o firewall doing nat/pat, so it will be blocking some corporations too. chabral - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail reports -- anyone have a wish list?
Maybe we should stop the perl or not to perl decision. Microsoft does endorse perl nowadays and even some of their tools are written in it but it is a kind of alien language on windows. It always was and will always be (I suppose). I do use it quite extensively for certain operations but only because nothing else is available. I agree with Michaels points, perl is just not a native windows app and so are perl applications. As a Windows user I would prefer something like /NET and only use perl if all else fails. Wim -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Beau E. Cox Verzonden: maandag 17 mei 2004 1:04 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Xmail reports -- anyone have a wish list? On Sunday 16 May 2004 07:00 am, Michal Altair Valasek wrote: |And finally, for the $64000 question: Can you explain me WTF=20 |difference does it make for a report tool, that reads text files and=20 |spits HTML (and that it is absolutely not performance critical), the |language that it is written in? It's not important what language uses the given application. Runtime=20 is what is important. So far, so good. For typical Windows system administrator, running Perl or Java=20 application is pain in the ass. The runtimes are complicated to=20 install and setup and tends to break any given security architecture=20 existing. WHAT? Have you installed Perl on Windows from ActiveState (http://activestate.com)? What is so hard about that? Three or four screens with a few simple options. Are you upset because it wants to install in c:\Perl and not in your magic c:\Program Files? WELL, CHANGE IT TO c:\Program Files by hitting the browse button right there on the screen. I just don't understand your problem. And the 'security issues' - what are you refering to? I can write insecure .Net apps as well as secure Perl apps on windows. I don't think security issues are tied to perl. If your up to it, please give examples of security problems caused by Perl. In the above situation, installing such runtime is a truly religious experience: you can't understand it, you must blindly faith in it. I would recommend going to church for religious experiences. Is this remark prompted by your lack of abliity or ignorance or both? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail reports -- anyone have a wish list?
Precisely. No java please! ..NET is ok for me. I don't mind perl for a reporting application. =20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Michal Altair Valasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 29 april 2004 9:36 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Xmail reports -- anyone have a wish list? =20 |Python and Java both work very well on both platforms. =20 I don't have experience with Python. But I *have* experience=20 with Java. Bad. =20 Multi-platformness is very nice for academic games or=20 marketing buzz, but not for real deployment.=20 =20 Please, write applications in way what is native for the=20 system they would run on. Do not experiment with Java and so on. =20 -- Altair =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: HOWTO run SpamAssassin on Windows in coincidence with XMail (the simple solution)
The main problem is that SpamAssassin does not produce XMail-compatible message, the pseudo-headers on top are not present. So this is over = =3D the possibility of simple batch file. xSpamassasinf solves this issue I think? However that creates the problem that xmail needs to process the mail single threaded -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Michal Altair Valasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 19 april 2004 15:04 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: HOWTO run SpamAssassin on Windows in coincidence with XMail (the simple solution) |exit /b 0 |exit /b 19 | |Is that right ? It does not matter. Command exit x would exit batch and command interpreter with errorlevel x. Command exit / x would not exit command interpreter but only the batch file. Because in this case the only thing =3D to be run is this batch, it works with /b as well as withount it. |Then, your solution rejects spam. Maybe you could consider=3D20 |adding a second parameter to allow marking without=3D20 |rejecting. Leaving the reject decision to the end user's MUA=3D20 |filtering system ? The main problem is that SpamAssassin does not produce XMail-compatible message, the pseudo-headers on top are not present. So this is over = =3D the possibility of simple batch file. I am now working on modification of my XMail-WAI, which would work the following way: filter would move (unmodified) spam messages to separate folder and you would be able to read them via web interface. They would =3D be kept there for defined time (about a week). -- Michal Altair Val=3DE1=3DB9ek, Microsoft MVP - ASP.NET=3D20 ASP Network - v=3DB9e o Microsoft technologi=3DEDch pro Internet _=3D __ http://www.aspnetwork.cz/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no place like 127.0.0.1=3D20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: HOWTO run SpamAssassin on Windows in coincidence with XMail (the simple solution)
H=E9, I didn't now about that onw. I will try -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Dario Jakopec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 19 april 2004 15:46 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: HOWTO run SpamAssassin on Windows in coincidence = with XMail (the simple solution) Hi, I think it would be worth trying to run spamd instead of = spamassassin directly, it is quicker and consumes far less memcpu (without any = cygwin environment). I have a filter in c that implements smapc on windows and info about = spamd setup, you can find it here: www.henry.it/xmail/xspamc.htm I also have a spamc command line version if anybody wants to implement = their own filter on windows. Ciao Dario - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
If open source just means ' please shut up' than closed source would be a much better alternative. I think that as a maintainer you should listen to the people using the software. This does not mean doing everything what people ask but listening. If there are things which the maintainer does not want to do he might delegate it to other people. As far as I can see Davide hates documentation. But that's okay, you should however in that case let other people do that job. In the end we might end up with both a good product AND good documentation. A win win situation so to say Wim -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Dale Qualls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 15:54 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide I guess I'm not trying to stifle it, but like everyone here, I have my = =3D opinions. I do have to ask how many times does Davide have to say no before people =3D realize that he's not going to make the change? People may = not be being =3D ungrateful, but beating this dead horse isn't going to make him change it. =3D It's HIS software (so his decision), yes it's open source, but that =3D doesn't change the fact that he's the writer/maintainer. Open source also =3D allowsfor people to change the code any way they see fit, including the =3D defaults for the smtprelay.tab file. If you're not happy with it change it, isn't THAT the beauty of open =3D source? If you think the documentation isn't up to snuff, write a howto. There's =3D one person on this list that writes a great Beginners Guide to... and =3D even he says to change it. It all comes down to the fact that you can =3D write it in 72 point text and people still won't RTFM. Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/31/04 10:47PM On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 12:59, Dale Qualls wrote: Okay, color me stupid, but is it so tough to empty the darned=20 smtprelay.t=3D ab=3D3D file? no - but I agree it's easy to miss. Even if it was left the way it was and there was a file named IMPORTANT.txt in the root directory of the archive that would suffice IMHO. I have always thought a little more documentation (or a little more well targeted documentation) was appropriate. I'm amazed at everyone bitching over a great product that no one pays=20 =3D any =3D3D money for. Yeah this is how software improves isn't it, by everyone keeping their mouths shut. Nobody is being ungrateful, we are just raising issues and offering solutions. I would rather have people email me their concerns about the software I develop than not finding out about them till months later. This is the beauty of open source - the ability to actually have your feedback listened to and acted on. Why you are trying to stifle this valid conversation I do not know. Cheers, Will. --=3D20 William Denniss - will@ http://tanksoftware.com/=3D20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
I think 'complaining' and 'suggesting' are getting confused here. And personally I don't want to use anything else but I think it is in the interest of everyone to have better documentation. Volunteers would be needed to do that. =20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Benny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 17:37 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide =20 Complainers, =20 I do not usually get into these debates, but I know how=20 hard it is developing little pieces of software here and=20 there. So I can only imagine how much Davide has on his=20 plate. Davide has never said, don't write documentation. If=20 you are going to use opensource, than you have to understand=20 what opensource involves. This is not MySQL, that has=20 developers up the wazzu. This is ONE man, with contributors=20 for any other code/projects. IF you have ever gone to=20 xmailserver.org(sarcasm), you would notice that all of=20 contributors links and documentation on the site. On top of=20 it all, this list is very supportive. I haven't ran into one=20 issue that hasn't been solved in this list. I also think=20 it's incredibly rude to assume that Davide is not listening=20 to other peoples ideas and what they want. Do you think that=20 everything in XMail is only stuff that Davide wants, and he=20 hasn't made ANY code for the user?=20 =20 I am going to end with this... Davide is the maintainer of=20 XMail, if you don't like it, than you don't have to use it. =20 Write your own mail server, or go use sendmail, qmail or=20 something... than you can complain to whomever. Take the=20 XMail code and add all you want to it, than release your own=20 opensource project. Who knows, maybe Davide will thank you=20 for getting all the complainers off his back hahaha. =20 Alright, I am done ranting. =20 ben =20 =20 Matic wrote: =20 Davide doesn't hate documentation but the users who DON'T=20 READ IT. He=20 just want to make it as simple as possible. Besides, he=20 already stated=20 that he changed his opinion regarding this issue, so now would be a=20 realy good time to close this thread and let the MAN work -=20 what he does best. Matic - Original Message - From: Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 4:51 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide =20 If open source just means ' please shut up' than closed=20 source would=20 be a much better alternative. I think that as a maintainer=20 you should=20 listen to the people using the software. This does not mean doing=20 everything what people ask but listening. If there are things which=20 the maintainer does not want to do he might delegate it to other=20 people. As far as I can see Davide hates documentation. But that's=20 okay, you should however in that case let other people do=20 that job. In=20 the end we might end up with both a good product AND good=20 documentation. A win win situation so to say Wim -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Dale Qualls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 15:54 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide I guess I'm not trying to stifle it, but like everyone=20 here, I have my=20 =3D =3D3D opinions. I do have to ask how many times does Davide have to say no before=20 people =3D3D realize that he's not going to make the change? =20 People may=20 =3D not be being =3D3D ungrateful, but beating this dead horse=20 isn't going=20 to make him change it. =3D3D It's HIS software (so his=20 decision), yes=20 it's open source, but that =3D3D doesn't change the fact that=20 he's the=20 writer/maintainer. Open source also =3D3D allowsfor people to = change=20 the code any way they see fit, including the =3D3D defaults for the=20 smtprelay.tab file. If you're not happy with it change it, isn't THAT the=20 beauty of open=20 =3D3D source? If you think the documentation isn't up to snuff, write a howto. There's =3D3D one person on this list that writes a great Beginners = Guide to... and =3D3D even he says to change it. It all=20 comes down to=20 the fact that you can =3D3D write it in 72 point text and=20 people still won't RTFM. Dale =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/31/04 10:47PM =20 On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 12:59, Dale Qualls wrote: =20 Okay, color me stupid, but is it so tough to empty the darned=3D20=20 smtprelay.t=3D3D =20 ab=3D3D3D =20 file? =20 no - but I agree it's easy to miss. Even if it was left the way it=20 was and there was a file named IMPORTANT.txt in the root=20 directory=20 of the archive that would suffice IMHO. I have always thought a=20 little more documentation (or a little more well targeted=20 documentation) was appropriate. =20 I'm amazed at everyone bitching over a great
[xmail] Re: Default Open Relay
=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Michael Schwarz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 31 maart 2004 10:57 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay =20 RaveRod schreef: =20 Are there any other mail servers that ship with an open relay? All the mail servers I've used have closed relays and in the manual/docs/whatever they =20 Microsoft Exchange Server :-) =20 -- Peter Lindeman - =20 It's not a mailserver, it is a bug! ;-) =20 Michael That is a silly comment. Exchange is a fine product. I'm also wondering if it is really true that exchange 2000 or at least 2003 is an actual open relay from the start. Exchange 5.5 and lower were that way but the whole SMTP interface was changed. Anyway, the help of Exchange 2003 says: Relaying: All except the list below=20 Use this option to prevent a specific list of computers from relaying e-mail messages through the virtual server, while allowing all other computers to connect.=20 Caution If this option is selected, and anonymous access is allowed as an authentication method, any computer on the Internet that is not on the list will be able to relay e-mail messages through the virtual server. This condition is called anonymous relay, and may result in unauthorized users relaying junk e-mail or other unwanted messages through your server. Additionally, operating an anonymous relay may be in violation of your Internet providers' terms of service.=20 This is better than a 'this is important' message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Default Open Relay
I agree. An email server admin should now about relaying and configure it appropiatly=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 31 maart 2004 9:02 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay =20 On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Tim McGarvey wrote: =20 I have to agree. I'll admit this makes me an idiot, but my first=20 installation I accumulated 40,000 bounces in my postmaster inbox=20 between going home on the go-live date and coming in the=20 next morning. =20 At the very least a note in the tab file saying WARNING,=20 the default=20 configuration is an open relay! or some such. I know it's=20 not smart,=20 but I just never imagined that any mail servers defaults=20 would be wide open nowadays. =20 Did you miss this is some way? =20 http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#configuration =20 In particular the step that says 'THIS IS IMPORTANT'. The=20 difference, giving for granted that user do not read the=20 documentation, is that if I close the relay I will receive=20 tons of email saying (subjects in random order): =20 I cannot send message through XMail ... What does relay denied means ... My server does not work, can you configure it for me ... =20 So basically I have to decide who pays. Myself being=20 personally annoied with those cr*p, or ppl that does not read=20 the doc and gets open relay.=20 I'd better stick my the current setup, what do you think? =20 =20 =20 - Davide =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AW: Re: Default Open Relay
It is in the interest of everybody to prevent any open relays. Making it clearer in the manual might help. Installers might help. =20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Harald Schneider Verzonden: woensdag 31 maart 2004 9:20 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] AW: Re: Default Open Relay =20 IMHO it would make sense to split these things off the manual=20 into a small seperate IMPORTANT.txt or READ_THIS_FIRST.txt=20 file. There is too many info to digest. Most people fly thru=20 the manual, do some trial and error and when port 25 is up=20 they think that their server is configured properly next=20 step is using the forum or the newsgroup, NOT digging the=20 manual again. Honestly - how often did you replied to Help -=20 Open Relay!! ?? :-) =20 --Harald =20 =20 -Urspr=3DFCngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Davide Libenzi Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. M=3DE4rz 2004 09:13 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay =3D20 =3D20 On Wed, 31=20 Mar 2004,=20 S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote: =3D20 Davide, you should mention it in the doc like=3D20 =3D20 h3 style=3D3Dcolor: redEMPTY SMTPRELAY.TAB OR YOU HAVE AN=3D20 OPEN RELAY/h3 =3D20 I won't help, sadly. Ppl does not read the doc, otherwise=3D20 they = will be=3D20 reading the configuration section, expecially=20 the 'THIS IS=20 IMPORTANT'=3D20 thing. =3D20 =3D20 =3D20 - Davide =3D20 =3D20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in =20 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help:=20 send the line help in the body of a message to =20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: SPF
No you shouldn't but you should also look for developments which show that a standard will be accepted by the majority and incorparate that one. I have now idea how far this SPF thing is in that direction. The fact that major players are backing it suggests it might be a good idea.=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 26 maart 2004 1:56 Aan: XMail mailing list Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: SPF =20 On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote: =20 Now you are getting into that chicken or egg argument :-/ =20 I agree, I=20 would love to see Xmail have more spam fighting=20 capabilities in it. =20 The only way we are going to see more usage of it on the=20 internet is=20 if we actually put it in place :) =20 So, should I drop in code for every sub-standard that pops up=20 here and there used at most by 0.001% of the internet? =20 =20 =20 - Davide =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AV Filtering Paths
mpack sucks, it doesn't deal properly with filepaths. In the end I got = another decoder from one of the listmembers. btw the filepath hasn't anything to do with filesharing and is not the = primary cause mpack is failing.=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jason Badry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 10 maart 2004 19:19 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] AV Filtering Paths =20 =20 I'm sure this has been addressed before, but I'm trying to=20 get my Xmail=20 server up to speed. I have it at v1.17 now, and managed to get Spam=20 Assassin working yesterday. My next project is to implement some AV=20 scanning. So far I've been working on the XAV c source which=20 comes with=20 MPACK. I added several debug statements for the system=20 calls, and I see=20 that MPACK is failing. It is getting passed a path with=20 '\\?\' in it. I=20 assume this is some sort of reference to filesharing=20 (\\SERVERNAME\C:\MailRoot\). However, I have everything on one machine=20 (Windows 2000). \\?\C:\MailRoot\spool\ Any help would be appreciated. Jason - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AV Filtering Paths
Are you using the correct returncode in the filter.tab? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Shiloh Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 10 maart 2004 22:33 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: AV Filtering Paths I am having the same problem. I am using XAV, ripmime, and f-prot for dos. According to the XAV.log file it appears to be catching the virus attachments, but the virus messages are still passing through to the mailboxes. I am not really sure how to debug this problem. Anybody have any ideas? - Original Message -=20 From: Jason Badry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:19 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: AV Filtering Paths Thanks for ripMIME. It got me one more step forward. I now have XAV=20 detecting the virus (reporting so in the log file), but XMail is still letting the file continue on its way. I'm wondering if my XAV script=20 is the newest available. The one I have was last updated on 16Oct2003 by D. Olivier. I've added several debug statements to capture system=20 calls and errorlevel return codes, but nothing besides that so far. What AV scanners are people typically using? Is the ClamAV one fairly robust / workable for Win32 (XMail 1.17 / Windows 2000). Thanks, ... Jason Badry At 08:37 PM 3/10/2004 +0200, you wrote: A, I forgot to mention that there's a new version of ripMIME but=20 the Windows port seems to be causing some trouble so I recommend=20 sticking to 1.3.0.5 for now (If anyone *really* wants 1.3.1.0/Win32,=20 e-mail me off the list). Liron Newman wrote: Try using ripMIME from pldaniels.com. The main stable source tree=20 doesn't compile on Windows but I made a modified version that does. I've worked with it for about a month and it stopped thousands of virus=20 messages.. So you can say it's working well. :) Grab my build from http://eesh.net/ripmime-1.3.0.5.Modified_for_Win32_[plastish_at_ultine t_ dot_org].zip, the EXE is under RipMime\Release in the ZIP. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in=20 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help:=20 send the line help in the body of a message to=20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in=20 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help:=20 send the line help in the body of a message to=20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AV Filtering Paths
I am personally getting fed up with those 'you have a virus' mails. Not only is this absolutely not true. I am also getting complaints from users who actually think they do have a virus because they received mails claiming so. I am now starting to block those warnings.=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jason Badry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 11 maart 2004 1:32 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: AV Filtering Paths =20 That is a good point and I have changed the '6' to a '4'. It=20 would be nice though to notify whoever is sending these=20 viruses so they can get their system cleaned up, but I do see=20 the logistical problems with that. I am somewhat concerned=20 about sending email to the 'bit bucket' with no sort of=20 review, but without being able to identify the sender=20 accurately, I guess this is best. =20 ... Jason Badry =20 At 06:12 PM 3/10/2004 -0500, Tracy wrote: May I *strongly* recommend that you do not send bounce notices for=20 virus emails? A large percentage of the virus emails these days are=20 from forged senders, so by producing and sending a bounce=20 notice, you=20 are - in effect - notifying an innocent party that they=20 have a virus, when they don't. If you feel you *must* notify someone, you should write some custom=20 code to take the connection IP address (which delivered the mail to=20 you) and work out the appropriate abuse mailbox for that=20 domain. That=20 would at least get it to the ISP of the machine which=20 delivered the email to you. A lot of the spam activists out there are also blocking based on=20 bounces to forged senders, so if you proceed you may find your mail=20 delivery blocked at various locations. Just a thought... At 17:59 3/10/2004, Jason Badry wrote: I was just going to send a followup email, as this was indeed my=20 problem (I changed the RetCode in filter.tab to a 6). =20 I've added=20 quite a bit more logging and a configurable logging path to XAV so=20 now it logs into my \Mailroot\Logs directory with the same=20 filename as the other logs. I currently have the return code set to 6, but then this was=20 notifying the postmaster of the errors, so I have for now turned=20 postmaster error notification in the system.tab. Is there=20 a return=20 code that would notify the sender, but not notify the postmaster? =20 I'd like to leave postmaster error notification on, but I=20 don't want to know about every virus file. Thanks, ... Jason Badry At 10:56 PM 3/10/2004 +0100, you wrote: Are you using the correct returncode in the filter.tab? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Shiloh Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 10 maart 2004 22:33 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: AV Filtering Paths I am having the same problem. I am using XAV, ripmime,=20 and f-prot=20 for dos. According to the XAV.log file it appears to be catching=20 the virus attachments, but the virus messages are still passing=20 through to the mailboxes. I am not really sure how to=20 debug this=20 problem. Anybody have any ideas? - Original Message -=3D20 From: Jason Badry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:19 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: AV Filtering Paths Thanks for ripMIME. It got me one more step forward. I now=20 have XAV=3D20 detecting the virus (reporting so in the log file),=20 but XMail is=20 still letting the file continue on its way. I'm wondering if my XAV script=3D20 is the newest available. The one I have was last updated on=20 16Oct2003 by D. Olivier. I've added several debug statements to capture system=3D20 calls and errorlevel return codes, but nothing=20 besides that so far. What AV scanners are people typically using? Is the=20 ClamAV one=20 fairly robust / workable for Win32 (XMail 1.17 / Windows 2000). Thanks, ... Jason Badry At 08:37 PM 3/10/2004 +0200, you wrote: A, I forgot to mention that there's a new version of=20 ripMIME but=3D20 the Windows port seems to be causing some trouble so I=20 recommend=3D20 sticking to 1.3.0.5 for now (If anyone = *really*=20 wants 1.3.1.0/Win32,=3D20 e-mail me off the list). Liron Newman wrote: Try using ripMIME from pldaniels.com. The main=20 stable source=20 tree=3D20 doesn't compile on Windows but I made a=20 modified version that does. I've worked with it for about a month and it stopped=20 thousands of virus=3D20 messages.. So you can say it's working well. :) Grab my build from =20 http://eesh.net/ripmime-1.3.0.5.Modified_for_Win32_[plastish_at_ ulti net_ dot_org].zip, the EXE is under
[xmail] Re: This is not professional
The M$ is a joke, and there's no hate involved. Hate is a tiring sentiment=20 and you want to reserve it to worthwhile things. I'd call it more like indifference. Let's leave it out then, imho it does look unprofessional although it is not a big deal. But since it is not a big deal anyway , you might as well leave it out. By the way, Linux is an OS, MS is a company, so I think the line should read Linux and Windows. Let's make it Window$ Windows is fine. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Highload
I was wondering if it is possible that xmail confuses mails in the following situation: - Xmail 1.17 - Spamassassin 2.61 - Windows 2003 I had a situation where at one point in time dozens of emails were processed in just a few seconds causing an overload on the server where even the dell management software started to complain the disk was beeing overloaded. The load was caused by a restart of the server after a period of time it couldn't send mail outside and was piling up in the server. For some reason 2 emails got merged with the same contents at that same time.=20 Unfortunatly this seems to be the only information I can get.=20 So, given the situation I was wondering: - Anybody ever seen something like this? - Could this be caused by the filter - if so, is it possible to prevent this? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Highload
It could have been more that 32 at a point in time. As far as I can see a LOT of mail was being processed. How can I control this? I don't know of the reentrance but I do know SA has some problems, the logfiles get locked (xmspamassassin) and I think there were some problems with the bayes filter under certain cirumstances.=20 I would suspect that if the filter crashes the mail will be passed. Is this the right assumption? Wim=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 11 februari 2004 20:41 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Highload =20 On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Wim Verveen wrote: =20 =20 =20 I was wondering if it is possible that xmail confuses mails in the=20 following situation: =20 - Xmail 1.17 - Spamassassin 2.61 - Windows 2003 =20 =20 I had a situation where at one point in time dozens of emails were=20 processed in just a few seconds causing an overload on the server=20 where even the dell management software started to complain=20 the disk=20 was beeing overloaded. The load was caused by a restart of=20 the server=20 after a period of time it couldn't send mail outside and=20 was piling up=20 in the server. For some reason 2 emails got merged with the same contents at that=20 same time.=3D20 =20 Unfortunatly this seems to be the only information I can get.=3D20 =20 So, given the situation I was wondering: =20 - Anybody ever seen something like this? - Could this be caused by the filter - if so, is it possible to prevent this? =20 Are you sure that the SA script is fully reentrant? You can=20 have up to 32 simultaneous calls to the script done by XMail. =20 =20 =20 - Davide =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Highload
-Mr 24 -Pl -Sl -Ql -Fl -Cl -Ll =20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 11 februari 2004 21:14 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Highload =20 On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Wim Verveen wrote: =20 It could have been more that 32 at a point in time. As far as I can=20 see a LOT of mail was being processed. How can I control this? =20 I don't know of the reentrance but I do know SA has some=20 problems, the=20 logfiles get locked (xmspamassassin) and I think there were some=20 problems with the bayes filter under certain cirumstances.=3D20 =20 I would suspect that if the filter crashes the mail will be=20 passed. Is=20 this the right assumption? =20 How do you run XMail (which command line)? =20 =20 =20 - Davide =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Highload
I use xmspamassassin but I notice problems with locking of the logfiles and presumably the bayesian filter. And I know that SA is the bottleneck in the system, but should that create the problem I mentioned. I think not, I would really want to know why this could happen.=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Don Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 11 februari 2004 23:34 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Highload =20 Which SA filter are you using? =20 If you're using bayesian with SA, then the bayesian word db=20 implements a lock file allowing one spamd process to=20 read/write from it at one time. SA will become your=20 bottleneck if you have enough threads running. Spamd is=20 configured to run a maxiumum of 10 children at a time. =20 My sa filter uses unique temporary file names so this could=20 not happen. =20 -Don =20 - Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Highload Date: 02/11/04 13:37 =20 I was wondering if it is possible that xmail confuses mails in the=20 following situation: - Xmail 1.17 - Spamassassin 2.61 - Windows 2003 I had a situation where at one point in time dozens of emails were=20 processed in just a few seconds causing an overload on the server=20 where even the dell management software started to complain=20 the disk=20 was beeing overloaded. The load was caused by a restart of=20 the server=20 after a period of time it couldn't send mail outside and=20 was piling up=20 in the server. For some reason 2 emails got merged with the same contents at that=20 same time.=3D20 Unfortunatly this seems to be the only information I can get.=3D20 So, given the situation I was wondering: - Anybody ever seen something like this? - Could this be caused by the filter - if so, is it possible to prevent this? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line quot;unsubscribe=20 xmailquot; in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help:=20 send the line quot;helpquot; in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Highload
I will at least implement that Q option I have another server wich got Ddos't by scripts when the doom virus started spreading.=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Edinilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 12 februari 2004 2:10 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Highload Urgentie: Hoog =20 Try to run spamassassin as spamd using cygwin. It will be +- 40% faster than cgi. http://news.spamassassin.org/modules.php?op=3Dmodloadname=3DNews; file=3Darticlesi d=3D55mode=3Dthreadorder=3D0thold=3D0[1] =20 Another tip:=20 Use -Qn 64 and put a limit in the number of scripts called once. This will prevent XMail to start scripts like an avalanche=20 (yes, a problem inwindows yet...) =20 Edinilson - Mensagem Original De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: [xmail] Re: Highload Data: 11/02/04 17:17 =20 =20 -Mr 24 -Pl -Sl -Ql -Fl -Cl -Ll =3D20 =20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 11 februari 2004 21:14 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Highload =3D20 On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Wim Verveen wrote: =3D20 It could have been more that 32 at a point in time. As far=20 as I can=3D20=20 see a LOT of mail was being processed. How can I control this? =3D20 I don't know of the reentrance but I do know SA has some=3D20 problems, the=3D20 logfiles get locked (xmspamassassin) and I think there were = some=3D20=20 problems with the bayes filter under certain=20 cirumstances.=3D3D20 =3D20 I=20 would suspect that if the filter crashes the mail will be=3D20 passed. Is=3D20 this the right assumption? =3D20 How do you run XMail (which command line)? =3D20 =3D20 =3D20 - Davide =3D20 =3D20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=3D20=20 xmail in=20 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general=20 help: send the line help in the body of a=3D20 message to=20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D20 =3D20 =3D20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 --- Links --- 1=20 http://news.spamassassin.org/modules.php?op=3Dmodloadamp;name=3DN ewsamp;file=3Darticleamp;sid=3D55amp;mode=3Dthreadamp;order=3D0am p;thold=3D0 2 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe=20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Xmail stats
I've tried Xmailstats 1.6 and I am seeing something peculiar. I have a directory filled with the smail en smtp logs of december and november. Now when I process them all at once I get different results then when I do both months seperately like this: Report Loglines processed Total 921298 December151507 November333535 So when I do all the months in one report I seem to get almost twice the amount of loglines. That doesn't seem right. What can be happening? If I do just one day it seems to be okay - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: can not send mail from asp ?
This is not completely correct. It is perfectly possible to send an email using a direct SMTP connection: (from the MS script center:) Set objEmail = CreateObject(CDO.Message) objEmail.From = [EMAIL PROTECTED] objEmail.To = [EMAIL PROTECTED] objEmail.Subject = Server down objEmail.Textbody = Server1 is no longer accessible over the network. objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _ (http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusing;) = 2 objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _ (http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserver;) = _ smarthost objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _ (http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserverport;) = 25 objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Update objEmail.Send Van: Xmail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: wo 5-11-2003 15:33 Aan: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: can not send mail from asp ? Are you trying to use CDONTS to do mail? This is dependent on the MS SMTP service. You can either keep the MS-SMTP service on the box but running on an alternate port or you can take a look at some alternate ASP email script solutions like ASPEmail (www.aspemail.com) -Original Message- From: Jhon Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: can not send mail from asp ? Hi,I can't believe what you said. Please tell us what ASP you are using. Hi! I have xmail server on windows machine. Every thing seems fine except I can not send email through ASP to local domains!! Please help Thanks Junaid - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis -- -- Type: application/ms-tnef -- File: winmail.dat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Wish for newbies
If the user (which is probably an admin of some kind) doesn't know what admin rights are he probably shouldn't proceed anyway There are some basic install helper applications btw -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 17 oktober 2003 11:22 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Wish for newbies Hi! I have seen that a lot of new users of xmail has basic installation=20 problem that they try to install it without admin rights on windows=20 machines. So I am sking you if there is someone who can make a nice install script for windows which would check or at least warn user for admin rights,=20 put some basic config like authentication or not, domain name, etc. I know that you'll probadly think hey there is manuall so they should=20 read it. Yeah wright. How many of you had read it before installing=20 Xmail? Of course there is a mailing list and forum to help but it would=20 be much easier to help when knowing that install is good with the=20 script. Like for the RedHat rpm script. Sasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Hide password in log
Just because someone CAN get to the files doesn't mean it should be easy. Passwords should either be removable from the log as an option or hashed (or both :-) ) I admit it sometimes very handy to check for spelling mistakes in passwords, but leaving them out would be nice too. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 23 september 2003 19:55 Aan: XMail mailing list Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Hide password in log On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Michal Altair Valasek wrote: Hello, | I have enabled POP logs. Is there any way to hide passwords=3D20 |in that log? | |What about setting the correct permissions to MAIL_ROOT ? It's the immediate solution, but the basic security rule is not to give =3D a chance - and no not rely on one thing. It's why you should patch your =3D server even when you're behind firewall. And why you should not store sensitive data secured only by access rights.=3D20 Especially when you recommend to run XMail in SYSTEM security context, =3D and thus allow access to anyone running the same context - for example any =3D other similar server software, which may have a security hole. Look, if someone get root/SYSTEM in your machine, hiding passwords from a log file does not help at all. Password cannot be hashed since they're required in plain when doing POP3/IMAP auths, and this can have the attacker to get them. A root/SYSTEM can do anything he wants on your machine, and this is by definition. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Stop using Osirusoft RBL!
Not a very nice thing to do. When you want to quit, quit. Blacklisting the world is not my idea of fun Van: Harald Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: wo 27-8-2003 8:21 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Stop using Osirusoft RBL! This service is no longer operational. Using it will cause all your = mails to be rejected as SPAM.=20 This also affects sall Spam Assasin users.=20 You find the whole story here: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=3D03/08/27/0214238mode=3Dthreadtid=3D= 111tid=3D 126 --Harald - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis -- -- Type: application/ms-tnef -- File: winmail.dat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: OT: Virus scanner for Windows / XMail
Ok, it might be just me but I went ahead and tried this one. It didn't work. I know xav.exe has been started. The message has been decoded because I can see the files appear. I can't find a report though. The commadline xav sends to avg seems to be malformed. Instead of a reportfile it seems to get the same path as it needs to scan? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: DOLIST Technical Center [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 25 augustus 2003 13:36 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: OT: Virus scanner for Windows / XMail Bonjour Tracy, Sunday, August 24, 2003, 7:46:49 PM, Tracy wrote: Does anyone have a recommendation for a virus scanner (not a filter script, the actual anti-virus program) for use with XMail on Windows? Being a=20 home user, I don't have much money to put into such a product, so if there is one which is inexpensive (or free) to use, that would be so much=20 the better check out : http://software.dolist.net/xav.asp Best regards, --=20 DOLIST Technical Center __ DOLIST.NET, Internet E-mail List Server Technology DOLIST information at : http://www.dolist.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: OT: Virus scanner for Windows / XMail
Never mind. Sometimes you just seem the miss the obvious -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Wim Verveen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 25 augustus 2003 21:25 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: OT: Virus scanner for Windows / XMail Ok, it might be just me but I went ahead and tried this one. It didn't work. I know xav.exe has been started. The message has been decoded because I can see the files appear. I can't find a report though. The commadline xav sends to avg seems to be malformed. Instead of a reportfile it seems to get the same path as it needs to scan? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: DOLIST Technical Center [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 25 augustus 2003 13:36 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: OT: Virus scanner for Windows / XMail Bonjour Tracy, Sunday, August 24, 2003, 7:46:49 PM, Tracy wrote: Does anyone have a recommendation for a virus scanner (not a filter script, the actual anti-virus program) for use with XMail on Windows? Being a=3D20 home user, I don't have much money to put into such a product, so if there is one which is inexpensive (or free) to use, that would be so much=3D20 the better check out : http://software.dolist.net/xav.asp Best regards, --=3D20 DOLIST Technical Center __ DOLIST.NET, Internet E-mail List Server Technology DOLIST information at : http://www.dolist.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail 1.16pre
I turned it off for that reason. I've pointed out on several occasions = they should get RDNS to work. But, you know, in the end, customers. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Nick Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 3 juli 2003 7:00 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Xmail 1.16pre =20 =20 =20 Yes it has been very effective for us, although too=20 effective.. we have a few business customers who domains do not do rdns for there=20 domains and are now complaining that they can not get there email through to=20 several of our domains. That is why I am trying to find a way to allow certain=20 domains to not be checked. =20 - Original Message -=20 From: Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:58 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail 1.16pre =20 =20 Anybody actually use RDNS successfully? I get to many false=20 positives (or negatives if you will :-) ) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Nick Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 3 juli 2003 6:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Xmail 1.16pre Can anyone tell me if this also applies to RDNS checks. Added a new configuration file smtp.ipprop.tab to be able to specify peer IP based configuration option, like=20 for example IP white listing against IP checks. --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 7/2/2003 Tested on: 7/2/2003 11:50:16 PM avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 7/2/2003 Tested on: 7/2/2003 11:57:50 PM avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com =20 =20 =20 --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 7/2/2003 Tested on: 7/3/2003 12:00:17 AM avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail 1.16pre
Anybody actually use RDNS successfully? I get to many false positives (or negatives if you will :-) ) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Nick Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 3 juli 2003 6:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Xmail 1.16pre Can anyone tell me if this also applies to RDNS checks. Added a new configuration file smtp.ipprop.tab to be able to specify peer IP based configuration option, like for example IP white listing against IP checks. --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 7/2/2003 Tested on: 7/2/2003 11:50:16 PM avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail-WAI
Just a note, my system is very safe. ;-) Happy downloading! -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Alex Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 3 juni 2003 20:55 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Xmail-WAI =20 =20 =20 Thanks! =20 This time I am going to burn it off to CD and put it safe somewhere. =20 Alex =20 - Original Message -=20 From: Bill Healy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 7:51 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail-WAI =20 =20 =20 That's the one you want, I was just trying to track it down on my system. =20 Bill =20 -- From: Wim Verveen[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail-WAI Maybe this one? http://www.win2kwereld.nl/downloads/w3JMail43Personal.exe -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Alex Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 3 juni 2003 20:41 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Xmail-WAI =3D20 =3D20 =3D20 Thanks, but this isnt what I am looking for. =3D20 JMail is a componet that needs to be used with XMail-WAI for=3D20 it to function properly. Its some kind of component that WAI uses for=20 pop3 and smtp interfacing with xmail. =3D20 - Original Message -=3D20 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:48 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail-WAI =3D20 =3D20 You can get JMail 2.1.0.6 from: http://www.jmail.com.my/DOWNLOAD/INDEX.html Hope that's what you're after. Regards Peter Edmond On 3 Jun 2003 at 15:54, Alex Young wrote: Hi, does anyone have a link to the personal edition of=20 Jmail for use with Xmail-WAI? The version on their website no=20 longer has pop3 facilities. Thanks, Alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line = unsubscribe=3D20 xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body=20 of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line=20 unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of=20 a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line=20 unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a=20 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D20 =3D20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: CDONTS and Xmail
To make a long story short, I just use CDONTS to send directly to an SMTP host. Always works. Function STDSendMessage (Mailfrom,Mailto,Mailsubject,Mailbody) Dim iMsg,iConf,Flds oLog.write loginfo, Starting to send message oLog.write loginfo, Mailto : Mailto oLog.write loginfo, Subject: Mailsubject Set iMsg = CreateObject(CDO.Message) Set iConf = CreateObject(CDO.Configuration) Set Flds = iConf.Fields With Flds ' Its good practice to use the module constants defined in the ' type library for the names. The full names are used here to ' indicate that this is what is going on .Item(http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserver;)= host .Item(http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusing;) = 2 .Update End With Set iMsg.Configuration = iConf 'Create your textbody here With iMsg .To= mailto .From = mailfrom .Subject= mailsubject .TextBody = Mailbody .Fields.Update .Send End With if Err.number 0 then oLog.write LogError, Sending message failed oLog.write Logerror, Err.number : Err.description STDSendmessage = 1 else oLog.write Loginfo, Message Send STDSendmessage = 0 end if Set iMsg = Nothing end function -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Serbulent Sertoglu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: zondag 23 maart 2003 2:49 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] CDONTS and Xmail Hi, I have a problem about sending mails with CDONTS (from ASP scripts) to domains on Xmail located on the same host. To clarify, I have IIS and Xmail on the same server and altough the mails asp scripts send to remote domains are successfull, mails sent to domains on Xmail are dropped to badmail directory of CDONTS. Is there anything I have to consider related to xmail or is this all with IIS virtual SMTP? Any ideas? Thanks.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] XMail-WAI en JMail
I've just got XMail-WAI up and running but I've discovered that the free version of jmail does not have the POP3 functions I need. Any solutions? Wim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Request for mail pickup feature
Supporting CDONTS would be the best way, all ASP code can remain the same only the mailserver is different. It's not a big issue thought, I use CDONTS to send it directly to the SMTP server instead -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Michal Altair Valasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: dinsdag 18 februari 2003 11:06 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Request for mail pickup feature Hello, XMail has built-in mail pickup feature - you drop file in specific = format to some folder and XMail will send it as e-mail. On Windows, the widely used Microsoft SMTP Service (part of operating system) has the same function, but different file format. There is lot = of programs who are using this function and they cannot be used with XMail. Would please be possible to add to XMail functionality to process these files too? I think that it would pass trough your few lines of code = limit ;-) It's generally possible to write software which would do that on its own (taking the MS-SMTP files a transforming them into XMail format), but I think so it would be easier to do in XMail directly. Format of file for MS-SMTP is according to RFC2822, but at beginning of = file are two additional headers x-sender and x-receiver, which are = similar to MAIL FROM: and RCPT TO: SMTP commands. x-sender may occur only once, x-receiver multiple, as in SMTP. -- Michal A. Valasek Altair Software Production *** New project: http://weblog.rider.cz *** __ Censorship can't eliminate evil; it can only kill freedom. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ICQ: 6160893 * GSM: +420-603-828493 For list of all my web projects visit http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Filter revolution poll ...
as long as filtering can be done at any level either incoming or outcoming with any kind of script or executable the solution you choose will be fine with me :-) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: woensdag 12 februari 2003 18:15 Aan: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Filter revolution poll ... On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Wim Verveen wrote: wille filtering on a domain or user basis still be possible? Sure it will ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Filter revolution poll ...
wille filtering on a domain or user basis still be possible? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Davide Libenzi [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden:woensdag 12 februari 2003 2:30 Aan: XMail mailing list Onderwerp:[xmail] Filter revolution poll ... Right now filter selection is pretty weak and now that I'm doing the inbound/outbound split is going to be even weaker. I was thinking about nuking the filters directory and have two files : filters.in.tab filters.out.tab The syntax of those files is : sender recipient cip sip command ... Where : sender= Message sender ( MAIL FROM ) recipient = Message recipient ( RCPT TO ) cip = Client IP sip = Server IP Example : *@mydomain.com * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 /bin/nukeit.sh ... hacker@* *@safedomain.com208.129.208.32/27 192.168.1.12/32 /bin/nukeit.sh ... Comments ? Question, how many different rulez are you planning to push in those two files ? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Whitelisting a server
One of my contacts happens to be in an ipblock wich has been blacklisted by ordb.org. His server is not at fault though. Is there a way to exclude servers from the exclusion list you get by using the custmapslist option in server.tab? FYI. this is my custmaps list line: CustMapsList relays.ordb.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0,relays.osirusoft.com.:0 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sorry for asking such a simple question
look up ctrl in the manual. I'm not a unix adept also but some fiddling with that made it work Nou how about a COM interface for xmail ? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Steen Rabol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februari 2002 16:40 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Sorry for asking such a simple question Hi I was out looking for a mailserver for my home lan where I connect to a ISP where and maintain mails for 6 domains, and saw Xmail which have support for multiple domains etc. all that I was looking for. As I'm NOT a *NIX user I also grapped a copy of different Windows tools to help me set up the server but, even a simple task such as adding a new domain fails due to the following error: XMailWizard crashes when I add a new server a small messages bos saying 'Server variables could not be set' XMail Admin say '-00110 bad controller login' And I don't have a clue. Is there a setup for dummies ? Thanks in advance. Steen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Sorry for asking such a simple question
I think a COM object of the ctrl protocol was what I meant, or will be enough anyway. Thanks, I wasn't aware of the fact. Since this is getting the attention of a few Windows 2000 sysadmins who work with xmail you might get some bugreports in the future ;-) Wim -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Shawn Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februari 2002 21:05 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Sorry for asking such a simple question Howdy, I should have a new version of XMWizard out in the next couple of days if you are interested. And as for you COM question, what kind of interface are you looking for. I have written a COM object of the ctrl protocol if that is what you need. Checkout http://xmail.eye-catcher.com Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steen Rabol Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Sorry for asking such a simple question Hi I created a new ctrlaccounts.tab, did a xmail --remove nad then a xmail --install, and nowXMail Admin works !! XMailWizard don't work, after I press update the progress just 'run' and nothing happens, so I'll stick to XMailAdmin Thanks. Steen - Original Message - From: Sönke Ruempler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 4:44 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Sorry for asking such a simple question XMail Admin say '-00110 bad controller login' setup you ctrlaccounts.tab properly (don't forget to XMCrypt the password in the file). Then you should be able to login into the CTRL-server. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
