[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16611986#comment-16611986 ] Hudson commented on YARN-7863: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #14931 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/14931/]) YARN-7863. Modify placement constraints to support node attributes. (sunilg: rev 67ae81f0e0ac7f107261ee15f2eb4d189e3b1983) * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/api/resource/TestPlacementConstraintParser.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/api/pb/PlacementConstraintFromProtoConverter.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/api/resource/PlacementConstraints.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/util/constraint/PlacementConstraintParser.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/api/pb/PlacementConstraintToProtoConverter.java * (add) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/event/NodeAttributesUpdateSchedulerEvent.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/placement/LocalityAppPlacementAllocator.java * (add) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/api/records/NodeAttributeOpCode.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/constraint/PlacementConstraintsUtil.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-applications/hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/applications/distributedshell/PlacementSpec.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api/src/main/proto/yarn_protos.proto * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-applications/hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/applications/distributedshell/Client.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/SchedulerNode.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/ResourceManager.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/capacity/CapacityScheduler.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/nodelabels/NodeAttributesManagerImpl.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/event/SchedulerEventType.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-applications/hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/applications/distributedshell/ApplicationMaster.java * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/api/resource/PlacementConstraint.java > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.2.0 > > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.011.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16593113#comment-16593113 ] Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7863: --- Sounds good to me, +1. Lets get this one in. Thanks [~sunilg], [~Naganarasimha]! > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.011.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16593114#comment-16593114 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Yes [~sunilg], as both the issues are related and we would require a test case for the weiwei's scenario too, hence i agree can be covered in other jira. Going ahead and committing the patch ! > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.011.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16593112#comment-16593112 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Thanks [~cheersyang] and [~Naganarasimha] This comment is valid and need to add more test cases. I ll take a stab in next patch with test case given the size and complexity of this patch. Thoughts? > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.011.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16593109#comment-16593109 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Hi [~sunilg], As discussed some comments can be handled in a separate jira, but still i could see test case coverage is not to that extent there from scheduler side of code. *PlacementConstraintsUtil* : "Evaluation of Placement expression containing Node Attributes". Also i believe i think [~cheersyang]'s comment is also valid, can you take a stab at it ? Lets conclude next one as the final patch so that i can go ahead and commit it to unblock the overall functionality! For all others lets raise separate jira's. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.011.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16593103#comment-16593103 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Thanks [~cheersyang] Since the constraint expression asks for java!=1.8, there could be some nodes which doesnt have java. But may nt sure abt version. Thats why i took a tighter approach for accuracy. Ur thoughts? > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.011.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16593099#comment-16593099 ] Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7863: --- Hi [~sunilg] Latest patch seems good to me, except one doubt. If I specify PC as "java!=1.8", for a node that doesn't have node-attribute "java", will this node satisfy the PC or not? I am expecting a true but seems the patch will return false. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.011.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16593012#comment-16593012
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7863:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
24s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-3409 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 18m
49s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 9m
19s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
32s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
21s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 45s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 4m
50s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
25s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
22s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 7m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 7m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
1m 26s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 2 new + 268 unchanged - 1 fixed = 270 total (was 269) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 14s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 6m
9s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
36s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 73m 44s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 15m 52s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}188m 21s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestRMHA |
| | hadoop.yarn.applications.distributedshell.TestDistributedShell |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:ba1ab08 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-7
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16592955#comment-16592955 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Thanks [~Naganarasimha]. Updating latest patch addressing comments > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.011.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16592847#comment-16592847 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Hi [~sunilg], Latest patch does not seem to consider all my [comments|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?focusedCommentId=16589559&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16589559] and also latest patch seems to have some checkstyle issues to be addressed. Can you please take a look at them? > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16592827#comment-16592827
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7863:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
28s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-3409 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 3m
28s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 21m
27s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 9m
3s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
33s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
8s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 20s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 5m
3s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
30s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
14s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 8m
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
1m 27s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch
generated 18 new + 268 unchanged - 1 fixed = 286 total (was 269) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 14s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 5m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
22s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 76m 4s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 16m 2s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}193m 6s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestRMHA |
| | hadoop.yarn.applications.distributedshell.TestDistributedShell |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:ba1ab08 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16592785#comment-16592785 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Since we use an enum, proto class with default to first value of enum (here its EQ). And this is coming in normal placement constraint (tags). So i added NO_OP as default enum to avoid such issues and to have a clean impl for pb. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16592784#comment-16592784 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Thanks [~cheersyang]. Fixed these issues and uploaded a new patch. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.010.patch, > YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16592740#comment-16592740 ] Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7863: --- Thanks [~sunilg], the patch looks good. To make code changes independent and incremental, I've created YARN-8715 to further make the allocation tags in this optional. There are some minor issues. # Some of unit test failures are related # There are some unused imports in classes # PlacementConstraintParser#TargetExprType can be removed # PlacementConstraintsUtil has "import *" # PlacementConstraintParser#getAttributeOpCode, can we throw an illegal argument exception if the op is something else than EQ/NE? # I think we need more UT to cover node-attributes, but that can be added in a follow up Jira Thanks > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16592687#comment-16592687
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7863:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
59s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-3409 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 1m
20s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 27m
17s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m
57s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 28s{color} | {color:orange} The patch fails to run checkstyle in hadoop-yarn
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m
34s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 37s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 4m
56s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
26s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 8m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 20s{color} | {color:orange} The patch fails to run checkstyle in hadoop-yarn
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 27s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 5m
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 0m 46s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 3m 13s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 74m 57s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 16m 24s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}197m 21s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.yarn.api.resource.TestPlacementConstraintParser |
| | hadoop.yarn.api.TestPBImplRecords |
| |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.TestCapacitySchedulerSchedulingRequestUpdate
|
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestRMHA |
| |
hadoop.yarn.server.res
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16592627#comment-16592627
]
Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863:
--
Thanks [~cheersyang] and [~Naganarasimha]
Improved syntax in latest patch. Now user can say like {{-placement_spec
foo=4,java=1.8}}. By this user can easily specify constraint and EQ or NE.
These are the 2 op codes which are supported now.
Kindly help to check the patch.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.009.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16590410#comment-16590410
]
Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863:
-
Thanks [~cheersyang] for the detailed clarification,
{quote} PCs are not associated with resource, so it's like an extra check after
all other checks are done. Scheduler still calculates how much resource
available in a partition for a given queue, assign resource from a node in this
partition to a request, but if PC is not satisfied then the allocation proposal
will be rejected. et
{quote}
Agree PC's are not directly involved with resource, But IIUC with the new API
:_SchedulingRequest_ for allocation of containers has only PC as the way to
specify partitions which is tied with resource . This is the reason i had my
concerns with the OR. Let me go through the code with new API and understand
whether Partition is handled for all scenarios. I was always under the
impression that there will be a constraint explicitly for the Partition based
on which resources are accounted ( USED, PENDING , RESERVED etc...). But if its
internal to the constraint which is also OR'd with others i am not completely
sure its addressing .
{quote}Partition in PC is not ready, to be honest, I am not sure if everything
is align with existing label-based scheduling. I suggested in YARN-8015 to open
a separate task for further enhance that.
{quote}
Let me too try to understand the PC and new api modifications in detail and
then share my feedback in that Jira and anyway its out of the scope for this
jira.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch,
> YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16589605#comment-16589605
]
Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7863:
---
Hi [~Naganarasimha]
Unlike partitions, PC is not associated with resource,
{quote}there is no way to find out for a given queue how much pending resources
are there in each partition it can access.
{quote}
PCs are not associated with resource, so it's like an extra check after all
other checks are done. Scheduler still calculates how much resource available
in a partition for a given queue, assign resource from a node in this partition
to a request, but if PC is not satisfied then the allocation proposal will be
rejected. Partition in PC is not ready, to be honest, I am not sure if
everything is align with existing label-based scheduling. I suggested in
YARN-8015 to open a separate task for further enhance that.
{quote}And also i am not able to envisage the scenario where in partition needs
to be OR'd with Allocation tags or Attributes.
{quote}
Agree, it won't make sense to put a OR between a partition constraint and a
allocation-tag/attribute constraint. But other combinations are useful. We
support this, however if a PC is really meaningful that is up to the user.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch,
> YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16589559#comment-16589559 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Hi [~sunilg], few other nits in the patch : * NodeAttributesManagerImpl ln no 205: as i was mentioning there is both debug and info log here ,i think we can remove the debug log. * NodeAttributesManagerImpl ln no 212-226 : Here you are sending out complete update of the node collections, and not just the modified NM's only. There are multiple impacts due to this, in large cluster we are unnecessarily sending lot of updates to scheduler secondly removed attributes will not be captured in this way. Where in later is more important * NodeAttributesManagerImpl ln no 212-226 : In general idea earlier was to make use of the AttributeValue by the scheduler so that the converted value is stored and used for comparison . But if we have the flexibility later on to change the scheduler event which is being pushed from NAM to Schedulers then i am fine with the Event being sent out, else i would suggest to send the AttributeValue itself * Test cases for AND and OR are covered ? Though i could see AND not declaratively covered in TestPlacementConstraintParser but better to cover with AND and OR explicitly * PlacementSpec ln no 51: typo "teh" > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16589171#comment-16589171
]
Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863:
-
Thanks [~cheersyang], for some clarifications but at the same time was
discussing with Sunil too.
{quote} PC doesn't affect any logic how scheduler selects requests, it is still
how it is handled now. A PC is simply checked twice when 1) creating an
allocation proposal on a node and 2) at commit phase against a specific node.
{quote}
I am not specifying that changes in this Jira alone introducing anything
implications but my point was, earlier when partitions was introduced it was
easy to determine pending resources per partition per queue in the earlier api
using resource request. Now with the New api introduced with PC(not just from
this Jira alone) there is no way to find out for a given queue how much pending
resources are there in each partition it can access. This is because PC can
have an Partition OR'd with Allocation TAG or with this Jira OR'd with
Attributes. Impact of this would be that Cluster admin will not be able to plan
resources for the partition per queue. And also i am not able to envisage the
scenario where in partition needs to be OR'd with Allocation tags or Attributes.
{quote}No, not necessarily. Just to keep the changes clean and incremental, we
can allow this form for now. Because this is the spec we used for distributed
shell. Since we don't have an --allocationTags argument. A "foo=3" is the only
way to specify allocation tags right now.
{quote}
Agree, My bad but the reason i got confused is all the parsing logic for the
Distributed shell's expression is present in "hadoop-yarn-api" project which
more so implies that this the API to be used by other apps too.
{quote}I want to reinforce the phase-target (for the merge), we want
node-attributes can be integrated into PC and support simple operation "=" and
"!=".
{quote}
Yes I concur with you on this, as long as we are able to clearly capture for
others what kind of Java API needs to be used to specify Node attributes.
[~sunilg],
Could there be a simple test case or example which captures how to write a java
api where in node attributes can be specified for a given SchedulingRequest
i.e. without any of these expression DSL's ?
Also i could not see a test case where in CS is handling scheduling of
containers with PC having attributes. So that modifications in
PlacementConstraintsUtil is tested.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch,
> YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16589116#comment-16589116
]
Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7863:
---
Hi [~Naganarasimha]
Regarding some of your comments
{quote}IIUC we can specify allocation tags, attribute expression and partition
label all in single expression ?
{quote}
Yes, this is supported. User can specify constraints against allocation tags,
node attributes and partition in a single expression (a conjunction expression
composed by AND or OR). E.g place a container on a node has allocation tag X
and javaVersion (node-attribute) = 1.8.
{quote}If its the case then how are we going select the outstanding/ pending
requests for a given queue for a given partition, as there could be OR with
allocation tags or attribute expression right ?
{quote}
PC doesn't affect any logic how scheduler selects requests, it is still how it
is handled now. A PC is simply checked twice when 1) creating an allocation
proposal on a node and 2) at commit phase against a specific node.
{quote}Allocation tags are created even if we want to specify attribute
expression ?
{quote}
No, not necessarily. Just to keep the changes clean and incremental, we can
allow this form for now. Because this is the spec we used for distributed
shell. Since we don't have an --allocationTags argument. A "foo=3" is the only
way to specify allocation tags right now. A follow-up task is to make that
optional. But I am not sure why even a single tag without container number is
supported, maybe [~sunilg] can comment more.
I want to reinforce the phase-target (for the merge), we want node-attributes
can be integrated into PC and support simple operation "=" and "!=". We want to
extend DS to support node-attributes PC expressions for testing, but with
minimal changes to the existing placement spec. For real users, their interface
will be java API or native service spec, not this spec in DS.
Hope that makes sense.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch,
> YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16589075#comment-16589075
]
Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863:
-
Hi [~sunilg],
Now i am confused when we have everything in one single expression .
* IIUC we can specify allocation tags, attribute expression and partition
label all in single expression ?
* If its the case then how are we going select the outstanding/ pending
requests for a given queue for a given partition, as there could be OR with
allocation tags or attribute expression right ? I think this issue should be
already existing when we have OR ing involved with allocation tags ?
* Based on the test cases in
TestPlacementConstraintParser.testParseNodeAttributeSpec, Allocation tags are
created even if we want to specify attribute expression ? ex :
"xyz,in,rm.yarn.io/foo=true" xyz is allocation tag ? If so users will be
really confused what to pass and what not !
* if i specify "IN" and have attribute expression as
"xyz,in,rm.yarn.io/foo{color:#d04437}*!=*{color}true" is it valid ? In future
when we come with more operators it would not make sense. I would suggest to go
with "," as separator.
I am not sure how many cases would be there where we want to specify all the
constraints in the same expression but we are making the users life complex
with having such a complex DSL.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch,
> YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16588996#comment-16588996
]
Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7863:
---
Hi [~sunilg]
Thanks for the updates. I think v8 patch has addressed most of my concerns. Two
comments:
PlacementConstraintsUtil.java
canSatisfyNodeConstraintExpresssion: looks like the logic only supports
affinity to node-attributes, does it support anti-affinity? e.g
{{targetNotIn(NODE, nodeAttribute("java", "1.8"))}}, can container with such PC
be allocated to nodes where {{java != 1.8}}? If it is not straightforward to
support this with {{targetIn}} and {{targetNotIn}}, I think we can add a API
something like {{targetNodeAttribute(Operator.EQ, "java", "1.8")}} ? For this
version, we can claim only to support {{EQ}} and {{NE}}. What do you think?
TestPlacementConstraints.java
line 72 and 85: why it is still {{nodeAttribute("java", "java=1.8")}}? The
value should be "1.8" alone right?
Thanks
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch,
> YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16588066#comment-16588066
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7863:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
24s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-3409 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 3m
31s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 29m
24s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 9m
24s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
22s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
15s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 7s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
33s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
36s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 10m
4s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 10m
4s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
22s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 59s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 4m
36s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 80m 27s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 16m 34s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}199m 7s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestRMHA |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:ba1ab08 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-7863 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12936498/YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 4401f7177d81 3.13.0-153-generic #203-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 14
08:52:28 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precomm
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16587849#comment-16587849 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Updated v8 patch. cc [~cheersyang] [~Naganarasimha] > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.008.patch, > YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16587634#comment-16587634
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7863:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
22s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-3409 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 3m
22s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 28m
54s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 9m
13s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
13s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 3s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
38s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
35s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 7m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 44s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 0m 52s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 70m 24s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 15m 53s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}180m 45s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.yarn.api.resource.TestPlacementConstraintParser |
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestRMHA |
| | hadoop.yarn.applications.distributedshell.TestDistributedShell |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:ba1ab08 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-7863 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12936438/YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux da294ff3ca12 3.13.0-143-generic #192-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 27
10:
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16587371#comment-16587371 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Thanks [~cheersyang] [~Naganarasimha] *TestCases* could be added for DS in another patch i think. It ll cover all DS level cases. I ll add AND & OR cases in this one. Other cases are covered. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.007.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16585329#comment-16585329 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Thanks [~sunilg], for the latest patch, Some of the things [~cheersyang] mentioned i too had the same issues and had mentioned in my earlier comment like : * _PlacementConstraintParser.NodeConstraintParser_ not to store value (had captured 2nd point) . * _getConstraintNameWithNameSpace()_ defaults the namespace (had captured 4th point) . And seems like many other comments like the following was not addressed or replied yet: * I replaced expression @ _TestPlacementConstraintParser ln no 481,_ with "OR(IN,python=true:NOTIN,java=1.8):IN,os!=centos:NOTIN,env=prod,dev" and i see exception as "_Invalid constraint expression OR(IN,python=true:NOTIN,java=1.8)_". IIUC our branch does not support OR expressions yet, So does it requires a rebase to confirm the same ? * Distributed shell needs to support both specs for the allocation tags and attributes, which i believe can only be achieved having AttributeSpec . Unless we have to seriously meet the deadlines then lets avoid it but if you already have it ready then why not go for it ? * TestPlacementConstraintParser ln no 453 : testParseNodeAttributeSpec has attributeName1, attributeName2; which is unused * ResourceManager ln no 652-654 createNodeAttributesManager should either return NodeAttributesManagerImpl or take parameter as rmContext instead of type casting * findbugs seems to be existent from the previous patch. I concur with most of the [~cheersyang]'s comments except * We need to have a info log or rather an audit to track the attributes being modified but nevertheless there is both info and a debug log of the same message @202 and 205 , but 222 can be avoided all together *TestCases :* * I would love to have a DistributedShell test case with Node attributes in the placement Contstraints. As discussed if required we can take the DS changes from here to a separate patch to make this patch less bulky * And & OR Expressions in the expressions * Test case for covering scheduling part of the Placement expression containing Node Attributes Shall we have a quick huddle some time this week, so that we can finalize on these stuff and then go ahead ? > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16584798#comment-16584798
]
Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7863:
---
Hi [~sunilg]
Thanks for the update, but I am afraid this needs some more polish.
*PlacementConstraintParser.java*
line 417: getConstraintNameWithNameSpace() defaults the namespace (when it is
missing) to "rm.yarn.io", why we have such assumptions in the parser? If some
other days we add more namespace types, we will need to change the code here
too.
line 397- 400: this confuses me.
{code:java}
target = PlacementConstraints.PlacementTargets.nodeAttribute(attributeName,
constraintEntities.toArray(new String[constraintEntities.size()]));
{code}
If I specify javaVersion=1.6, this seems to be setup as
{code:java}
nodeAttribute("javaVersion", "javaVersion=1.6")
{code}
this is incorrect. This API should be
{code:java}
// Single value
nodeAttribute("javaVersion", "1.6")
// Multiple values
nodeAttribute("javaVersion", "1.6", "1.7", "1.8")
{code}
You can take a look the original form in line 76 of
\{{TestPlacementConstraintManagerService#}}. That said, the attributeValues
should not have OPERATOR, it's just values. We will someday add a "Operator"
field in \{{SingleConstraint}} when we fully support various of operations,
such as GT, LT etc. Lets not change the meaning of the API. Note, if we correct
this, the logic in \{{PlacementConstraintsUtils}} will also need to be updated.
*PlacementConstraint.java*
We don't need to add \{{constraintKey}} in \{{AbstractConstraint}}, this is the
base class for constraints, it could be \{{SignleConstraint}}, also could be
\{{CompositeConstraint}}. You'll find this field is meaningless if it is
\{{CompositeConstraint}}.
For node-attribute expr, if allocation tags is not given, then we don't need
this info in {{SchedulingRequest, Set allocationTags }}argument can be
null or an empty set.
*SingleConstraintAppPlacementAllocator.java*
I don't think we need to get node-attributes in
SingleConstraintAppPlacementAllocator. For logging purpose, we can just print
PC, that will print everything we need. Because 1) if the PC is a composite
one, multiple node-attributes specified, which one will be used? 2) PC could be
affinity or anti-affinity, just memorize the attributes is not helpful.
Some minor logging issues, there are some logs need to be removed or change to
DEBUG level,
* LocalityAppPlacementAllocator.java: line 369
* NodeAttributeManagerImpl.java: line 205, 222
* RegularContainerAllocator.java: line 144, 148, 155
Hopefully this makes sense.
Thanks
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch,
> YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16584441#comment-16584441
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7863:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
45s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-3409 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 3m
26s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 27m
12s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
10s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
22s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
17s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 59s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
25s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
37s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 7m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 21s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
34s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api
generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
27s{color} | {color:red}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 0m
50s{color} | {color:red}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-applications/hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell
generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
36s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 72m 45s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 15m 47s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}178m 20s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| FindBugs | module:hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16584281#comment-16584281 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Updating a refined patch. Thanks [~cheersyang] for quick offline comments. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.006.patch, > YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16583613#comment-16583613
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7863:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 17m
43s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-3409 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 3m
31s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 27m
10s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
46s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
58s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 29s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
14s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
25s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
12s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red} 0m
16s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch
failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 3m
7s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 3m 7s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
9s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvnsite {color} | {color:red} 0m
19s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch
failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 33s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
18s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api
generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
14s{color} | {color:red}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 0m
20s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch
failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 73m 0s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 0m 20s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}171m 13s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| FindBugs | module:hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16583362#comment-16583362 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- For now, i removed AttributeSpec class. Using same placement_spec. However i have already done a separate parse etc for a clener impl of node attribute. Hence retaining all same. cc [~Naganarasimha] [~cheersyang] > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16583360#comment-16583360
]
Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863:
--
Attaching an end-to-end working patch. (only anti-affinity support in
Scheduler, once [~cheersyang] patch is in, affinity will be supported for
placement spec as whole including node attributes
Test steps:
*Configuration*
{code:java}
yarn.resourcemanager.placement-constraints.handler
scheduler
{code}
*Add attributes:*
{{yarn nodeattributes -add localhost:java=1.8}}
*Run DS*
{{yarn org.apache.hadoop.yarn.applications.distributedshell.Client -jar
../share/hadoop/yarn/hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell-3.2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
-shell_command sleep -shell_args 10 -num_containers 2 -placement_spec
NOTIN,java=1.8}}
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.005.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16577644#comment-16577644 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Thanks for the patch [~sunilg] and apologies for the delayed review, as i was not acquainted with Placement Constraint part of the code, i required some time in understanding the placement constraints and then in relation how you have modified it. But still could not figure out few of the stuff * Not completely clear sure how the parsing happens for the *And* and *Or* cases which was mentioned by [~cheersyang] in his earlier comment "_-placement_spec OR(IN,python=true:NOTIN,java=1.8):IN,os!=centos:NOTIN,env=prod,dev"_ Just tried to replace the same in your test case but seems like it fails at PlacementConstraintParser.parseNodeAttributeExpression ln no 669. Whether its expected to fail or it should assume it as *And* and proceed? * In PlacementConstraintParser.NodeConstraintParser.parse() PlacementTargets target in ln no 399 seems to include keys also in val. Was not sure why we need to store in this way, would it not be bettert only values here * Can we place both constraints related to attributes and allocation tags together in a single placement spec for distributed shell? As I understand the Placement spec API supports to take multiple type of placement constraints for a single resource/allocation request. We too should support it right ? * NodeConstraintParser.parse seems to assume that attributeNameSpace has "rm.yarn.io/" but IIRC we concluded that user need to specify this explicitly right else exception is thrown right ? some minor comments * TestPlacementConstraintParser ln no 453 : testParseNodeAttributeSpec has attributeName1, attributeName2; which is unused * ResourceManager ln no 652-654 createNodeAttributesManager should either return NodeAttributesManagerImpl or take parameter as rmContext instead of type casting * Seems like build seems to have find bugs and test case failures. Can you please have a look at it ? > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16567462#comment-16567462
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7863:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
22s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} YARN-3409 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 3m
53s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 26m
9s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 10m
18s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
18s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
54s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 52s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
11s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
20s{color} | {color:green} YARN-3409 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
14s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 9m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 9m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 37s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
25s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api
generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
24s{color} | {color:red}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
17s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 80m 43s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 15m 40s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell in the patch failed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}185m 46s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| FindBugs | module:hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api |
| | Possible null pointer dereference of placementConstraints in
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.util.constraint.PlacementConstraintParser$NodeConstraintParser.parse()
Dereferenced at PlacementConstraintParser.java:placementConstraints in
org.apa
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16567127#comment-16567127 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Attached rebased patch. [~cheersyang], these constraints are treated as independently in scheduler. For each request on the lookup node, we can check the placement request which is demanded. And if multiple constraints are made on one requests, it will be checked sequentially. Current design is inline with placement spec design what is done. But i think AND mapped to : might have created a bit of confusion. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863-YARN-3409.004.patch, > YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16561858#comment-16561858
]
Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7863:
---
{quote}
For DS, I think its better we correlate with placement_spec for now for better
easiness in review and api compatibility.
{quote}
+1 for this idea. This way we can specify allocation tags and node attributes
in PC expressions under same syntax.
but for this expression:
{noformat}
-placement_spec
OR(IN,python=true:NOTIN,java=1.8):IN,os!=centos:NOTIN,env=prod,dev
{noformat}
I don't think we should use ":" to represent AND. The convention was to use ":"
as the delimiter between each child of a conjunction expression (AND or OR). In
the released version of DS, referring to
[https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r3.1.0/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/PlacementConstraints.html|https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r3.1.0/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/PlacementConstraints.html],
{noformat}
zk=3,NOTIN,NODE,zk:hbase=5,IN,RACK,zk:spark=7,CARDINALITY,NODE,hbase,1,3
{noformat}
this actually represents 3 separate placement constraints instead of a AND with
3 children.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16561134#comment-16561134 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Hi [~sunilg], Patch seems to fail after rebase (tried locally too). Can you please take a look at it ? > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, > YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16558735#comment-16558735
]
genericqa commented on YARN-7863:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} docker {color} | {color:red} 0m
11s{color} | {color:red} Docker failed to build yetus/hadoop:abb62dd. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | YARN-7863 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12933244/YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch
|
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/21379/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch,
> YARN-7863-YARN-3409.003.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16558728#comment-16558728
]
Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863:
--
Thanks [~Naganarasimha] and [~cheersyang] for comments
A quick summary based on an offline discussion:
{noformat}
DS Example:
bin/yarn org.apache.hadoop.yarn.applications.distributedshell.Client -jar
share/hadoop/yarn/hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell-3.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
-shell_command Sleep
-shell_args 10
-num_containers 2
-master_memory 200
-container_memory 200
-placement_spec
OR(IN,python=true:NOTIN,java=1.8):IN,os!=centos:NOTIN,env=prod,dev
{noformat}
For DS, I think its better we correlate with placement_spec for now for better
easiness in review and api compatibility. A refactor improvement could be done
later to improvise this inline with native service approach.
Proposal for jira for later time is
{{-placement_spec (python=true OR java!=1.8) AND (os!=centos) AND (env NOTIN
(prod,dev))}}
Now to expand more on below approach in patch,
{noformat}
-placement_spec
OR(IN,python=true:NOTIN,java=1.8):IN,os!=centos:NOTIN,env=prod,dev{noformat}
we could see this like
*put me to a node where it has node-attribute python=true.*
OR
*dont put me in a node where it has node-attribute java=1.8*
AND
*put me to a node where it has node-attribute os is not centos.*
AND
*dont put me in a node where it has attributes env with values prod or dev*
Also attaching a patch based on this including comments from Naga.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16553691#comment-16553691 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Have done just a first pass review, few higher level comments : # I think Distributed shell related modifications can be pulled into separate Jira (YARN-8289) as discussed earlier # I could not get in the meeting wrt to Attributes and Partitions/labels, IIUC in ResourceRequest we specify the label expression directly but in SchedulingRequest we can give it as part of PlacementConstraint ? And if so we club it with the attribute expression ? May be we need capture that explicitly over here.can you share a sample request with both of them available? # Attach the doc which captured our conclusions on the expression or capture the essense of it as Jira's descritpion Other minor aspects: * PlacementConstraints.java ln 52- 53, better to use NodeAttribute.PREFIX_DISTRIBUTED & PREFIX_CENTRALIZED * PlacementConstraintParser ln 363-436 NodeConstraintsTokenizer seems to be not used anywhere ? * ResourceManager ln no 652-654 createNodeAttributesManager should either return NodeAttributesManagerImpl or take parameter as rmContext instead of type casting * .bowerrc ln no 3, might not be related to this patch ? * TestPlacementConstraintParser : captures a single test case , we need to capture more examples of capturing the positive and negative expression validation cases * TestPlacementConstraintParser ln no 457 : is this the approach which we finalised ? i thought its much more expressive like the document in PlacementConstraintParser.parsePlacementSpecForAttributes As well change the status of the Jira to patch submitted so that jenkins build will be triggered. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16552201#comment-16552201 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Hi [~sunilg], While i am going through the patch, would you mind converting the status from Inprogress to patch submitted so that the jenkins build is run ? > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863-YARN-3409.002.patch, YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16534148#comment-16534148
]
Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863:
--
Thanks [~Naganarasimha] for the comments.
{quote}bq. 1.who is doing the validation of the resource request?
{quote}
>> Validation will be done by scheduler module similar to validate
>> ResourceRequest.
{quote}bq. 2. If there are any open resource request for specified attribute,
do we allow removing of that attribute from Attribute Manager ?
{quote}
>> I think this is not required for now. We can see if any attributes are used,
>> and stop deleting such as its already in used. For pending case, some user
>> has asked for some resources, but scheduling didnt happen as NMs were down
>> or all nodes are full with that attribute. For latter case, we wont delete
>> the attribute as its used. In case first case, its possible that NMs were
>> down and may come back late or we dont know the timeline. At that time, it
>> makes sense to remove. However we can think more corner cases and come with
>> some protection later.
{quote}bq. 3 .Confused little with the logic (may be earlier code to yours), i
was always of the opinion that the partition is the first to be compared and
then with tag or attribute here
{quote}
>> Actually attribute and tags are different. We can have a combined OR or AND
>> across attributes/tags however these two need not have to be considered in
>> same expression as use case is specifically for attribute or tag. I
>> discussed with [~leftnoteasy] on this, and he also suggested to keep
>> attribute different to tag and make the relation by using OR and AND.
{quote}bq. PlacementConstraintsUtil, ln no 145-156 : Scheduler node needs to be
having map of NodeAttributeKey -> NodeAttribute value to make it O(1), as well
this will more useful when we go other types and operator based comparison
happens. Or to consider for current scenario atleast it would be better to
override NodeAttribute's equals method.
{quote}
>> Sure. I will update similar.
I am improving this patch with some test cases and will share a new one
tomorrow.
> Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7863.v0.patch
>
>
> This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support
> node attributes.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16529118#comment-16529118 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - [~sunilg], Few queries before going into the detail ... 1. who is doing the validation of the resource request? 2. If there are any open resource request for specified attribute, do we allow removing of that attribute from Attribute Manager ? 3. Confused little with the logic (may be earlier code to yours), i was always of the opinion that the partition is the first to be compared and then with tag or attribute here it seems to first check for the allocation tag and then for partition and then attribute. should it not be like under a given parition check any nodes having allocation tags and/or attributes satisfying the user's request? Some comments : 1. PlacementConstraintsUtil, ln no 145-156 : Scheduler node needs to be having map of NodeAttributeKey -> NodeAttribute value to make it O(1), as well this will more useful when we go other types and operator based comparison happens. Or to consider for current scenario atleast it would be better to override NodeAttribute's equals method. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16529111#comment-16529111 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Thanks for the patch [~sunilg], It gives a very good idea what you plan to do in scheduler for node attributes. At the high level overview approach seems to be fine. Hope you can change the status of the Jira to Patch available so that Jenkins run can happen. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16526965#comment-16526965 ] Sunil Govindan commented on YARN-7863: -- Attaching first version for this patch. I will add more test cases and other enhancements in next patch. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil Govindan >Assignee: Sunil Govindan >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-7863.v0.patch > > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16474464#comment-16474464 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-7863: - Thanks [~sunilg], Would support you in the review of it ! > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil G >Assignee: Sunil G >Priority: Major > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16474124#comment-16474124 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-7863: --- Given YARN-7892 is now committed, updating this patch shortly > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil G >Assignee: Sunil G >Priority: Major > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16347372#comment-16347372 ] Konstantinos Karanasos commented on YARN-7863: -- Ideally there should be no API changes for this, right? Since we already allow node attributes in the target. I agree with [~asuresh] that there are two aspects to this (support node attributes in the target and in the scope), and we should tackle them in separate JIRAs. So we can keep this one for the target only. For the scope case, I was thinking whether we should only support a subset of the node attributes or whether it is no extra effort to support any attribute. But we can continue the discussions about this in YARN-7858. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil G >Assignee: Sunil G >Priority: Major > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16346479#comment-16346479 ] Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7863: --- Hi [~sunilg], if you have bandwidth, I appreciate if you can work on this once YARN-6592 is merged into trunk. I marked this one is related to YARN-7858. We can later sync up on this and YARN-7858 once any of us get to work on either of them. Thank you! > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil G >Assignee: Sunil G >Priority: Major > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16346399#comment-16346399 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7863: -- [~asuresh] / [~sunilg] , is there anything need to be done before merge or 3.1.0 release? If there's no API changes needed, we can delay all related implementations once YARN-3409 finished. > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil G >Assignee: Sunil G >Priority: Major > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16346391#comment-16346391 ] Arun Suresh commented on YARN-7863: --- [~sunilg], There are actually two aspects to this: # Supporting node attributes as a Target Expression: For eg: place containers with allocation tags on nodes with attribute java_version = 1.8. # Supporting a node attribute as a Scope: For eg: place 5 containers, no more than one per failure domain. Assuming all nodes in cluster has a node attribute called "failure_domain" with values 1 - 10. 1) can be tackled here I guess. but 2) needs some modifications to the AllocationTagsManager and should be handled YARN-7858. Thoughts [~kkaranasos] / [~leftnoteasy] ? > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil G >Assignee: Sunil G >Priority: Major > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7863) Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16346382#comment-16346382 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-7863: --- [~cheersyang] I thought of creating this ticket under YARN-3409 itself as placement constraint work is close to merge? Thoughts? > Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > --- > > Key: YARN-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7863 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Sunil G >Assignee: Sunil G >Priority: Major > > This Jira will track to *Modify existing placement constraints to support > node attributes.* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
