edits edits edits.
the world went edit mad
here's why i like edits:
normally theyre pressed nice and loud now, so someone can make an
edit of an LP track that might have not sounded too hot in the mix
and it will be nice and loud and edited for mixability.
all true. Usually. The sound
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>edits edits edits.
>
>the world went edit mad
here's why i like edits:
normally theyre pressed nice and loud now, so someone can make an
edit of an LP track that might have not sounded too hot in the mi
-- Original Message --
From: "Andrew Duke Cognition Audioworks
>re: remixes, commissioned or not?:
>And people like Yam Who? started out by doing
>bootleg remixes (called remixes because they added
>layers of acoustic instruments--new drums, basslines,
>key
4 10:14
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) edits
edits edits edits.
the world went edit mad
anyway, I got the "Magick Edit Allstars" 1&2, and they made a right mess of
the labels, 01 has the labels of 02 and vice versa.
(these are good edits btw I think, worth having, little ext
Cobert, Gwendal wrote:
... sounds like the best answer so far. Bringing a second question : a re-edit is usually
done without the original artist's authorization, while a remix is
"commissioned" by the artist, right ?
Gwendal
re: remixes, commissioned or not?:
And people like Yam Who? sta
13@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313
> edits
> not necessarily, to pick one example if you look back over detroit
> history a lot of tracks were created by one person and then re-edited
> before release by another person. it's how a lot of detroit
> artists got
>
-Original Message-
>From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 12:08 PM
>To: robin; Cobert, Gwendal
>Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: RE: (313) edits
>
>
>Isn't that how Carl Craig got his break and aren't a few of
>Derrick May&#
Isn't that how Carl Craig got his break and aren't a few of Derrick May's
releases edited by an uncredited Craig?
-Original Message-
From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 12:04 PM
To: Cobert, Gwendal
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (31
issioned" by the artist, right ?
Gwendal
-Original Message-
From: Tom Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:42 A
M
To: Cobert, Gwendal; 313
Subject: Re: (313
edits
what is the difference between an "edit" and a "remix" ???
IL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:42 A
M
To: Cobert, Gwendal; 313
Subject: Re: (313
> edits
> what is the difference between an "edit" and a "remix" ???
>
> A re-edit, in the original sense of the word, uses only the final
> two-channel (stereo) re
> what is the difference between an "edit" and a "remix" ???
A re-edit, in the original sense of the word, uses only the final
two-channel (stereo) recording of a song, which is then cut up, extended,
shortened, reversed, put through effects etc. These days this would most
likely be done in audio
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Cobert, Gwendal wrote:
> And now for a VERY stupid question...
>
> what is the difference between an "edit" and a "remix" ???
I've figured that edit is like a mix, shortened or lenghtened version of
the original tune without changing the main feeling of the original tune.
R
And now for a VERY stupid question...
what is the difference between an "edit" and a "remix" ???
Gwendal
> -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:14
> AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313
&
edits edits edits.
the world went edit mad
anyway, I got the "Magick Edit Allstars" 1&2, and they made a right mess of
the labels, 01 has the labels of 02 and vice versa.
(these are good edits btw I think, worth having, little extended bits, few
crazy fx etc). they made 'slicks' "spacebass" s
14 matches
Mail list logo
