EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 6:11 PM
>To: Ken Odeluga
>Cc: Martin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: RE: (313) first techno record - summary
>
>
>from what i hear, 30,000 was fairly normal back then. Juan's told
I personally didn't find SAW2 that challenging or inaccessable at all. To
me, it is simply beautiful music. It did, however, completely change the way
I think about what music is and can be, and furthermore became one of those
albums that defines a year (1995 I believe it was for me). Every time
On Mar 5, 2004, at 10:13 AM, Mann, Ravinder [CCS] wrote:
Ive been pondering this. Ive got SAW1 and like it and was thinking of
getting SAW2 but a lot of the reviews don't rate it much. I something
to
listen to when I need some headspace, you know when you just wanna
chill,
albeit in a darker
) first techno record - summary
from what i hear, 30,000 was fairly normal back then. Juan's told me that
they used to sell 50,000 copies of Cybotron records mostly in the Midwest
alone.
Figure there were only very few electronic dance records back then, so
EVERYONE bought the same ones
from what i hear, 30,000 was fairly normal back then. Juan's told me that
they used to sell 50,000 copies of Cybotron records mostly in the Midwest
alone.
Figure there were only very few electronic dance records back then, so
EVERYONE bought the same ones.
It could also be a gross exageration.
13) Re: 808 United States (was RE: (313) first techno record -
summary)
> The very first rave I ever went to was O(sub)3, held at the
> Long Beach Convention Center in early March 1991. I haven't
> got the vaguest idea how it came about that I was to go to it,
> but I do know that
On Mar 5, 2004, at 12:33 PM, Brendan Nelson wrote:
I was in America in around 1991 with my 808 State t-shirt
on - some girl noticed it when I was in a shopping mall,
and started chatting to me; she even asked me out to an 808
State gig that was going to be happening in about a month's
time!
You
an Nelson
com> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 313
mailing list <313@hyperreal.org>
cc:
03/05/04 09:24 AM Subject: Re: (313) first
]
Date: Friday, March 5, 2004 9:32 am
Subject: Re: RE: (313) first techno record - summary
>
> >We spent our allowances on Joy Division, Depeche Mode, The Fall, The
> Smiths, Flower'd Up, The Farm, Happy Mondays, >Inspiral Carpets,
> and the
> Charlatans, etc etc etc.
&g
TED]
Sent: 05 March 2004 15:35
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: RE: (313) first techno record - summary
My first Aphex experience was hearing the track "Digeridoo". I wouldn't
have called it breaks or 4/4, or techno exactly, but at a time when
people called everything electronic
SAW2 is genius - in fact I still think its AFX's finest moment.
-Original Message-
From: Mann, Ravinder [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2004 15:13
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '313'
Subject: RE: (313) first techno record - summary
joe,
Ive bee
AIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, March 5, 2004 9:05 am
Subject: RE: (313) first techno record - summary
> Remember, if it's got electronic noises but no 4/4 kick drum then
> it's not techno - it's breaks!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Ta
s got electronic noises but no 4/4 kick drum then it's
> not
>> techno - it's breaks!
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: 05 March 2004 15:07
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mann, Ravinde
>We spent our allowances on Joy Division, Depeche Mode, The Fall, The
Smiths, Flower'd Up, The Farm, Happy Mondays, >Inspiral Carpets, and the
Charlatans, etc etc etc.
and I spent all mine on records from the U.S
you wanna swap houses..?
the grass is miles greener on the other
PM
> To: Brendan Nelson; 313 mailing list
> Subject: Re: (313) first techno record - summary
>
>
> "I got up this morning knowing we had a sold out gig ahead, the car started
> first time and all the traffic lights turned to green as I approached. Even
> the grey sky se
What was it that Bkork said about techno, Martin?
I think it was you who posted it to that Big Chill thread
-Original Message-
From: Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:16 PM
To: Brendan Nelson; 313 mailing list
Subject: Re: (313) first techno record - summary
iginal Message -
From: "Mann, Ravinder [CCS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, March 5, 2004 6:15 am
Subject: RE: (313) first techno record - summary
>
> Im quite suprised that 808 are right up there, they made the charts
> in the UK. Didnt realise they were such
lor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 05 March 2004 15:07
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mann, Ravinder [CCS]; 313@hyperreal.org
>> Subject: RE: (313) first techno record - summary
>>
>>
>> How is Aphex Twin not techno?
>>
>> -Original Message-
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2004 15:02
To: Mann, Ravinder [CCS]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) first techno record - summary
first few techno albums of mine:
air liquide "increased difficulty of concentration
prototype 909 "acid technology"
air li
> Subject: RE: (313) first techno record - summary
>
>
> How is Aphex Twin not techno?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:02 PM
> To: Mann, Ravinder [CCS]; 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject:
How is Aphex Twin not techno?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:02 PM
To: Mann, Ravinder [CCS]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) first techno record - summary
first few techno albums of mine:
air liquide "incr
first few techno albums of mine:
air liquide "increased difficulty of concentration
prototype 909 "acid technology"
air liquide "black"
ultramarine "united kingdom"
aphex twin "selected ambient works 2" (not techno, but
related in a weird way)
-Joe
Roughly counting in my head in most mention
http://www.geocities.com/labwerx
-Original Message-
From: Mann, Ravinder [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 5:16 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) first techno record - summary
Roughly counting in my head in most mentioned order you got...
The new d
Martin>didn't say 30,000 was
>a fact either.
s'alright, didn't take it as 'red'.
just to put it in perspective I remember reading that Carl Cox's FACT did
120,000, and more recently a dimitri from paris comp did 70,000 in a couple
of weeks.
but, again, they're just from the back of my mind and m
Back in the day that would have not been a good figure for the [EMAIL
PROTECTED] in
marketing but no I'm not taking the pish at all and I didn't say 30,000 was
a fact either.
Numbers have nothing to do with how good a record is, well not in my head.
Martin
5/3/04 1:50 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]@uk.
>Can't remember the figures but they are a lot lower than you'd think, well
I
>was shocked...30,000 seems to ring a bell...
right, right.
I see. wonder if that's UK only.
guess anyone but a major would be made up with 30,000!
alex
p.s. the world needs more techno scandal stories..
: )
__
>Can't remember the figures but they are a lot lower than you'd
>think, well I
>was shocked...30,000 seems to ring a bell...
>
In techno terms that's a blockbuster. But you're probably taking the pish,
right? ...
k
@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) first techno record - summary
Can't remember the figures but they are a lot lower than you'd think, well I
was shocked...30,000 seems to ring a bell...
5/3/04 12:52 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]@uk.pwc.com
>
>> 10 was a subsidiary of Virgin, wasn't
Can't remember the figures but they are a lot lower than you'd think, well I
was shocked...30,000 seems to ring a bell...
5/3/04 12:52 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]@uk.pwc.com
>
>> 10 was a subsidiary of Virgin, wasn't it? I thought those two
> compilations
>> (ie vol 1 + 2) had been really successful.
>10 was a subsidiary of Virgin, wasn't it? I thought those two
compilations
>(ie vol 1 + 2) had been really successful. Maybe sales weren't that great
>in Virgin terms
I thought they'd done 'ok' too - I always thought the story went that Neil
Rushton did these comps, 'broke' the techno sound in
ogs.com/release/57919
-Original Message-
From: Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2004 12:26
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) first techno record - summary
Mmm if everyone's first record was Techno - The New Sound Of Dance, how
comes it did so badly...is this like
>Mmm if everyone's first record was Techno - The New Sound Of Dance, how
>comes it did so badly...is this like I've seen TG, when in truth there
where
>only really 15 people there...
ha ha! there's a classic one of these in Manc - *that* sex pistols gig at
the free trade hall.
But, I have my own
From: Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2004 12:26
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) first techno record - summary
Mmm if everyone's first record was Techno - The New Sound Of Dance, how
comes it did so badly...is this like I've seen TG, when in truth t
; but it would
have been a good laugh, I don't doubt!
Brendan
(ps: what happened to Roland Rat's "Rat Rappin'"? ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Mann, Ravinder [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 March 2004 12:16
> To: 313@hyperreal.org
> Sub
Maybe they bought second hand copies?
-Original Message-
From: Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 12:26 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) first techno record - summary
Mmm if everyone's first record was Techno - The New Sound Of Dance, how
com
Mmm if everyone's first record was Techno - The New Sound Of Dance, how
comes it did so badly...is this like I've seen TG, when in truth there where
only really 15 people there...
Martin
5/3/04 12:15 PM Mann, Ravinder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Roughly counting in my head in most mentioned
Roughly counting in my head in most mentioned order you got...
The new dance sound of detroit
808 State
Inner City
Juan Atkins
Strings/The Dance
A Guy Called Gerald
Aphex/FSOL
UR releases
Plastikman
Im quite suprised that 808 are right up there, they made the charts
in the UK. Didnt realise they
37 matches
Mail list logo
