RE: [313] AMG Criteria

2002-02-08 Thread Josh Landau
At 06:22 PM 2/7/2002 -0500, you wrote: It is entirely up to the editor, who is influenced by the publisher and their concerns about the market they are targeting. I'd never presume about your experiences, so *please* don't presume about ours. AMG has never received any type of suggestion,

Re: [313] AMG Criteria

2002-02-07 Thread seth redmond
You might want to try the Rough Guide to Techno. It's got a pretty good, and relevant selection, one of those books which you can flick endlessly back an forth between artists. Problem is I keep looking at it before I leave for work. So just as I'm about to leave on time it's ... ah! Sunrise

RE: [313] AMG Criteria

2002-02-07 Thread John Bush
If your are looking for info Richie Hawtin, Derrick May or f*cking Moby, it's all in there, obviously, but also names you (me) wouldn't expect like Michael James, Frank de Groodt Astralasia. Yes, there's a reason we didn't call it the All Music Guide to Techno... ; There *are* hundreds of

Re: [313] AMG Criteria

2002-02-07 Thread Mike Brown
So I began to wonder what the criteria are to put an asrtist/DJ/group in a book like this one? Does he/she have to be famous? Sold at least 20.000 copies of a single/album? Major impact on the development of the dance scene in general? It is entirely up to the editor, who is influenced by the

RE: [313] AMG Criteria

2002-02-07 Thread John Bush
It is entirely up to the editor, who is influenced by the publisher and their concerns about the market they are targeting. I'd never presume about your experiences, so *please* don't presume about ours. AMG has never received any type of suggestion, concerning direction or inclusions, from