At 05:04 27.01.02 +1100, you wrote:
>Yes, it sounds like a subtle send-up/tribute of Timbaland with his 'raps',
>really cool. I got it on a CD single very easily. Incidentally, what is
>Carl's mix of Blaze's Lovely Dae like?
i'd say, very dense and intensive, much like the original but with
a typ
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 03:16:06PM -0500, Phonopsia wrote:
> > Also is it possible to get his mix of Tori Amos' God and what
> > formats did this come out on?
>
> "God" was on CD for sure and may have been on vinyl as well. I'd be
> surprised if there weren't at least promo copies of it floating a
- Original Message -
From: "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313 Detroit" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [313] C2 Remixes - Was [Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey
pullen - electric relaxation]
> Al
t;313@hyperreal.org>
>Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:48 AM
>Subject: RE: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
>
>
>> ...Carl Craig at The End -
>> when no one liked his remix of Buena Vida - that was funny: 'What The
>Fuck!'
>
- Original Message -
From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED] Org" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:48 AM
Subject: RE: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
>
ybe it's like a girl/guy, you
may think he/she is hot, your mate may think not. It's all relative.
--
>From: "s mcgill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org>, ":P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [313] RE:
#x27;t
be arsed with this"... he had been dropping a number of classics throughout.
- Original Message -
From: Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: [3
at The End -
when no one liked his remix of Buena Vida - that was funny: 'What The Fuck!'
he said when no one danced - But it got a cheer!
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:22 PM
>To: s mcgill
I remember the night you're talking about although I think I was mainly in
the main room for Hawtin & Aquaviva that night. I caught him the time
before at The End and that was only about a month earlier. That time was
the first time I heard him spin and I liked what I heard, all good
dancefloor ma
-
From: :P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>; Niko Tzoukmanis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
> is Staceys release work good?
>
> his the shittiest D
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>; "Niko Tzoukmanis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
>
> his the shittiest DJ I've even gone to see 3-4 times
>
> I th
D] Org" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:13 AM
Subject: RE: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
> ok ... I never noticed him doing that when I saw him - twice. I would say
> definitively that he didn't mix in such a lazy and fra
> is Staceys release work good?
MS-20 (kenny larkin remix) and TMT-01 (meditive fusion) are for me the best
techno releases EVER (in the top 10 at least...)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
>Picture the scenario (and I may be very wrong - correct me if I am)
>
>Renee says to Derrick "Can I release some of your stuff? Here's a large
>advance"
>Derrick replys "D'oh, sure you can Renee, can I cash this straight away?"
Yes, you are wrong.
>Is the R&S label still running? It´s a lo
In a message dated 1/24/02 3:39:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Speaking of the R&S / Transmat connection Can someone explain to me what
> the
> basic idea was to release the records under the R&S flag? Is it a
> distribution
> thing or something? And what made Tra
him off just yet.
>-Original Message-
>From: Niko Tzoukmanis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:09 PM
>To: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: RE: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric
>relaxation
>
>
>that's a good one, and o
yeah, body rock is a great tune..
has also been sampled on paperclip people's 'reach'
At 16:25 24.01.02 +0100, you wrote:
>I've never heard him spin, but whatever you want to say about him
'Bodyrock' (a track that I never hear mentioned in SP discussions) off his
Silent Phase album is one of my fa
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu 24/Jan/2002 16:13 CET
> To: ":P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED] Org"
> <313@hyperreal.org>
> Subject: RE: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
>
> ok ... I never noticed
een him immensely - it's not
just about slick trix, is it?
>-Original Message-
>From: Toby Frith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:56 PM
>To: :P; 313@hyperreal.org; Niko Tzoukmanis
>Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electr
MAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:56 AM
>To: Toby Frith; 313@hyperreal.org; Niko Tzoukmanis
>Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric
>relaxation
>
>
>well OK then, since I was promptly attacked by several people, let me
>qualify my stateme
that's a good one, and one of the good techno jazz
approaches, unlike the last kirk degiorgio offworld
album (sorry, just an opinion, if you hate me for that,
don't hesitate to tell me your opinions..)
actually there are not too many releases by stacey, but
what i've heard from him are brilliant.
a
.
--
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ":P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Toby Frith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>; "Niko
Tzoukmanis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: [
I didn't flame either! You're entitled to your opinion - I was just
pointing out that a lot of people would not share that opinion (I know this
from the response I got when I asked a question about Stacey - he has a lot
of fans on this list) - that's all. Chill!
G.
--
24, 2002 2:42 PM
>To: :P; 313@hyperreal.org; Niko Tzoukmanis
>Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric
>relaxation
>
>
>Bit harsh to say he's a bad DJ - he plays a variety of different sets -
>I've seen him a few times and he's always got an
":P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>; "Niko Tzoukmanis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
> I'm not flaming - it may be that when he's pl
IL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>; Niko
Tzoukmanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
> well OK then, since I was promptly attacked by several people, let me
> qualify my statemen
cted by the material he
>releases.
>His last LP has grown on me in the last couple of months.
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: :P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <313@hyperreal.org>; Niko Tzoukmanis
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, January 25, 200
h" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ":P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>; "Niko Tzoukmanis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
> Bit harsh to say
ouple of months.
- Original Message -
From: :P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>; Niko Tzoukmanis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
> is Staceys release work good?
>
&
his the shittiest DJ I've even gone to see 3-4 times
I think most people agree that Stacey Pullen is a top DJ. I've only been to
see him once but he made me get off the seat I was sitting on and go &
dance to a great selection of solid tech-house grooves for the rest of the
night. I'm just waitin
fast.
--
- Original Message -
From: "Niko Tzoukmanis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
> r&s still exists, latest releases afaik is
>
---Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:01 PM
>>To: Maarten Baute; 313@hyperreal.org
>>Subject: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
>>
>>
>>I don't know
t;Subject: [313] RE: (313) RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
>
>
>I don't know why they did it, but one thing is sure: TMT-01, TMT-02 and
>MS-19 & MS-20 will never get a repress...
>You can get any transmat record nowadays, except for those four released
>thru R&a
I don't know why they did it, but one thing is sure: TMT-01, TMT-02 and
MS-19 & MS-20 will never get a repress...
You can get any transmat record nowadays, except for those four released
thru R&S.. (and I hate it)
>>>Oh? Didn't know that.
Is the R&S label still running? It's a long time I heard f
anuary 24, 2002 10:16 AM
>To: Maarten Baute; 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: Re: [313] RE: (313) stacey pullen - electric relaxation
>
>
>
>Memo from Alex Bond of PricewaterhouseCoopers
>
> Start of message text
>
>3 little words - M
Memo from Alex Bond of PricewaterhouseCoopers
Start of message text
3 little words - Money Money Money. What else?
Picture the scenario (and I may be very wrong - correct me if I am)
Renee says to Derrick "Can I release some of your stuff? Here's a lar
> Speaking of the R&S / Transmat connection Can someone explain to me
what the
> basic idea was to release the records under the R&S flag? Is it a
distribution
> thing or something? And what made Transmat step out of this construction?
Planet
> E did the same thing, for the same reasons?
I d
37 matches
Mail list logo