Bernard Hill writes:
| In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
| >flats you find at the start of the staff; "global accidentals" are
| >accidentals applied to notes throughout the music. (Does anybody ever use
| >these?)
|
| French Horn parts (and maybe brass in general) in orches
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>John Chambers wrote -
>
>>I've also found the phrase "explicit key signature" more useful than
>>"global accidentals", though I don't suppose that's a real big deal.
>
>These seem to me to be two separate things. Whem converted to conventio
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:03:25AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Richard Robinson wrote -
>
> >abc2win introduced constructs, out of the blue,
> >that the abc->ps family have never _been_ able to read.
>
> I really wish I understood this hate campaign against abc2win.
If I'm running a "camp
Bryan Creer wrote:
I really wish I understood this
hate campaign against abc2win. On his website, Jim Vint credits a great
many people who gave him support some of whom are still active on this list)
so he didn't work in isolation. Many developers have introduced their
innovatio
Richard Robinson wrote -
>abc2win introduced constructs, out of the blue,
>that the abc->ps family have never _been_ able to read.
I really wish I understood this hate campaign against abc2win. On his website, Jim Vint credits a great many people who gave him support some of whom are still activ
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:50:40PM +, John Chambers wrote:
> (Has anyone written any musical parodies in abc yet? Aside from the
> good old 4'33", that is.)
I wrote an arrangement of "The Morning Star" (from O'Neill) for string
quartet using ABC, but I'm not sure that's the kind of thing you
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:50:40PM +, John Chambers wrote:
> Phil Taylor writes:
> | Bryan Creer wrote:
> | >Unfortunately, to really to solve compatability problems you need a
> | >masochistic altruist who will go back and remove all the line-break !s
> | >from all the
> | >tune files created
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:54:25PM +0100, Phil Taylor wrote:
> Bryan Creer wrote:
>
> >Unfortunately, to really to solve compatability problems you need a
> >masochistic altruist who will go back and remove all the line-break !s
> >from all the
> >tune files created with abc2win over the last eigh
Phil Taylor writes:
| Bryan Creer wrote:
| >Unfortunately, to really to solve compatability problems you need a
| >masochistic altruist who will go back and remove all the line-break !s
| >from all the
| >tune files created with abc2win over the last eight years or so which
| >might annoy
| >the pe
Bryan Creer wrote:
>Unfortunately, to really to solve compatability problems you need a
>masochistic altruist who will go back and remove all the line-break !s
>from all the
>tune files created with abc2win over the last eight years or so which
>might annoy
>the people who chose to put them in. (
Richard Robinson wrote -
>It woul be a start. I fear the only real answer (or not even that) would be
>for some masochistic altruist^H^H^H^H wonderful person to write a Windows
>app providing similar functionality, to which people could be encouraged
>to "upgrade" in order to solve compatability p
John Chambers wrote -
>The difference is somewhat minimal, though. The original text had as
>example "K:D =c", which implies a key signature of two sharps but
>with a natural written before all the c's. The natural reaction to
>this is "If all the c's are natural, why put a c sharp
John Chambers wrote -
>I've also found the phrase "explicit key signature" more useful than
>"global accidentals", though I don't suppose that's a real big deal.
These seem to me to be two separate things. Whem converted to conventional
notation, an "explicit key signature" is the collection of
13 matches
Mail list logo
