http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8842
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 22:59 ---
BTW. on un-patched 2.6.22, if you
# echo 0 > /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/*/polling_frequency
immediately after boot and before you do the build,
does the performance problem go away
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8842
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #12311|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7874
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 22:41 ---
this patch works well in version 20061109 of ACPICA
and this patch has already been in version 20070508 of ACPICA
thanks:)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/u
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7873
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 22:37 ---
this patch works well in version 20061109 of ACPICA
and, the bug has gone in version 20070508 of ACPICA
thanks:)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cg
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7872
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 22:36 ---
this patch works well in version 20061109 of ACPICA
and, the bug has gone in version 20070508 of ACPICA
thanks:)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cg
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7871
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 22:35 ---
this patch works well in version 20061109 of ACPICA
and, the bug has gone in version 20070508 of ACPICA
thanks:)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cg
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7780
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1641
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 19:42 ---
It is necessary to disable ioapic when "nosmp" or "maxcpus=0" is set in the
command-line. There are several methods to fix this bug. Of course the simple
way is that the "no
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7499
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 19:29 ---
It silently hangs in 2.6.23-rc2.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8860
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from [EM
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8630
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|m
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8860
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bugs.osdl.org
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1641
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 18:02 ---
Why isn't the fix to simply imply "noapic" when "nosmp" or "maxcpus=0" is set?
ie. invoke disable_ioapic_setup() from nosmp()
and from maxcpus() as appropriate?
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 15:07 ---
# cat /sys/power/state
mem disk
So, my machine doesn't support S1, eh? Why is it that Windows XP "does the
right thing" and always suspends when I close the lid and resumes wh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 13:44 ---
Something else that's VERY interesting:
cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
0: 720651763 IO-APIC-edge timer
1:461 4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8842
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 13:27 ---
YES, the attachment to comment #11 is too brutal ;-)
I think the best solution would be to identify some
broken machines and to provide better trip points for
them if needed. P
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Thinkpad x61 Tablet (irq 20:|irq NN: nobody cared on
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 11:28 ---
Okay, I'll check this. Sorry for the delay. I just moved to North Carolina
and am very busy.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8842
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 10:40 ---
> There are no thermal events as the trip points are crossed
This explains why Windows doesn't fail on this machine.
Windows doesn't poll. As the machine never sends events,
i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7237
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-sleep- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7780
--- Comment #101 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 10:38 ---
That's a good news. :-)
Tejun, what's the status of the patch from Comment #79?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rec
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3584
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #51 from [E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 10:31 ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> I will test later today. Do I need to be running the latest mm
> kernel, or is the latest Linus tree okay?
What was the result?
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8286
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 10:30 ---
Can anyone please tell me what the current status of this issue is?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this ma
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-sleep- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8370
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 10:19 ---
Can you please try the 2.6.23-rc2 kernel?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7499
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 09:38 ---
Any progress with this in the newest kernels?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Yo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7995
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7780
--- Comment #100 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 07:25 ---
Good news. s2ram -f -p -a 2 works (at least for one time, I will test more) on
this laptop with a 2.6.23-rc2 kernel. Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 07:14 ---
Two more comments: I am running Fedora 7 x86_64, the OP gentoo i386 (correct me
if I am wrong). So it is not a 32/64 bit issue.
Also, there was a similar discussion concerning a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8803
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 05:33 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> > don't know, verify that the Fn keys and other special keys work as expected,
> > brightness control, jogdial if any.
>
> I'll try to. I haven't su
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8562
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 02:15 ---
User space symptom: problems with using the /dev/ttyS3 port,
just like when serial driver is using wrong IRQ. No traffic, long delays, etc.
"setserial /dev/ttyS3" shows correct
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8562
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 01:47 ---
More background: In this particular case ports are intentionally
configured in BIOS settings to use
ttyS0: port 0x3f8, IRQ 4
ttyS1: port 0x2f8, IRQ 3
ttyS2: port 0x3e8, IRQ 10
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8562
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-08 00:25 ---
The problem symptom is that a user-space program fails to communicate with the
serial port if ACPI is allowed to route IRQs.
An init script calls setserial in the following way:
37 matches
Mail list logo