RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread joe
Generally you shouldn't need a "schema admin" account. During your normal running state, there should be no reason to have anyone in that group. You definitely don't want to have some generic ID with that access as I don't believe in managing the directory like that from generic "function

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Francis Ouellet
"Then you have your actual Enterprise Admins and that should be a small group, maybe 2-5 people depending on your size (I worked on a team of 3 people and supervisor for a 250,000 user deployment)." So I'm assuming that you have more than 1 Enterprise admin in your root domain? Isn't that

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Renouf, Phil
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis Ouellet Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 3:15 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts Then you have your actual Enterprise Admins and that should be a small group

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Francis Ouellet
février 2005 15:21 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts What do you do when you have an AD support group than need access to Enterprise Admin privs if you only have one Enterprise Admin? I know I wouldn't want to be the only guy

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts What do you do when you have an AD support group than need access to Enterprise Admin privs if you only have one Enterprise Admin? I know I wouldn't want to be the only guy with those privs in the middle

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Coleman, Hunter
OuelletSent: Friday, February 25, 2005 1:15 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts "Then you have your actual Enterprise Admins and that should be a small group, maybe 2-5 people depending on your size (I worked on a team

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread joe
thoughts on securing sensitive accounts "Then you have your actual Enterprise Admins and that should be a small group, maybe 2-5 people depending on your size (I worked on a team of 3 people and supervisor for a 250,000 user deployment)." So I'm assuming that you have more than 1

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Creamer, Mark
of hours automatically mc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis Ouellet Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 3:29 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts How about a generic ent

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread joe
, 2005 3:29 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts How about a generic ent. Admin account? One with an obsure name and 10 foot password? Only selected support/admin people have the password? Just thinking out loud here

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Renouf, Phil
Kirkpatrick Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 3:30 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts I wouldn't give those rights to a group... Just one or two people in the group, and only after proper vetting. Vetting would include the usual

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Gilbert, Daniel L Mr ANOSC/FCBS
) this plan has worked for us. Dan -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 1:30 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts I wouldn't give those rights to a group... Just

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Francis Ouellet
2005 15:37 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts Totally agree, but in very large environments that group of trusted admins is going to have to be more than just one guy. I think 2 or 3 guys (depending on the size

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Francis Ouellet
this. Truly appreciated! Francis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gilbert, Daniel L Mr ANOSC/FCBS Sent: 25 février 2005 15:45 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts Who are you

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread joe
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts Who are you calling good corporate citizen? We only have three (3) people with EA rights for an Enterprise with over 300,000 user accounts and 200 plus DCs. Schema Admins is empty. Have

RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts....

2005-02-25 Thread Rick Kingslan
@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Some thoughts on securing sensitive accounts Some of that is symantics. If you have only one Enterprise admin account, and only one person who knows the credentials for that account, then there are some large organizational risks if something happens