V201309 Placement Performance Report - Managed & Automtic

Reading the release notes for V201309, I was excited to see Placement Performance Report- Automatic placements are now included in this report. I am now attempting to identify automatic versus managed placements within this report. So I started at the UI and used the tab “Display Network” an

Re: V201309 Placement Performance Report - Managed & Automtic

Happy Columbus Day Google API Team - Quick Question on V201309 and PLACEMENT_PERFORMANCE_REPORT? Looking for proper reportDefinition to obtain "Managed" vs "Automatic" placements field - available via the "Status" column in UI and as documented here: http://goo.gl/oJV9Te. Do I need to continue

Re: CustomerService OAUTH_TOKEN_HEADER_INVALID

It would be a huge help for NoClientLibrary .NET developers if you could please outlinewhere to add the override to GetWebRequest method w/n the generated stub code in order to pass along the OAuth token in the HTTP header

Re: V201309 Placement Performance Report - Managed & Automtic

OK, thanks Danial. If possible, please let me know results of your inquires into this issue, eta for update/solution or the bad news. Have a wonderful weekend, David On Monday, October 14, 2013 11:12:56 AM UTC-4, Danial Klimkin wrote: > > Hello DK, > > > Thanks for bringing this up. I'll chec

ManagedCustomerService to get all my Clients - Using OAuth

If anyone can help with the following code, which is correctly showing the page.totalNumEntries for my MCC, but not allowing me to reference the * page.entries* in order to get the actual ManagedCustomer objects I am requesting. ' Create the selector. Dim oManagedCustomer As New

Re: V201309 Placement Performance Report - Managed & Automtic

OK Zweitze - I'll post my outcome for your suggested work around until Google API team gets feature corrected. On Monday, October 21, 2013 2:15:46 PM UTC-4, Zweitze wrote: > > You could try to make the distinction with column Id. > Managed placements have ids, but automatic placements do not have

Re: V201309 Placement Performance Report - Managed & Automtic

So far so good using your suggested logic for the criterionID value and running the PLACEMENT_PERFORMANCE_REPORT! Thanks for your assistance - have a wonderful weekend! On Monday, October 21, 2013 2:15:46 PM UTC-4, Zweitze wrote: > > You could try to make the distinction with column Id. > Manage

Re: ManagedCustomerService to get all my Clients - Using OAuth

Doh, after a bit if side by side SOAP envelope review, I noticed the following differences: GGL Client Library: https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/mcm/v201309";> https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201309";>Login https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201309";>CustomerId https://

Re: Couple questions about Report Definition.

If you mean reporting data, start with this recent blog: http://goo.gl/dlOdF3. First link will place you in the heart of the Report Definition WSDL technical manual. Here is the link to the section of the manual: https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/guides/reporting It is not possi

Re: V201309 Placement Performance Report - Managed & Automtic

Danial, I noticed Google made progress with fixing DSA ads reporting in another thread on the forum. Will a column be exposed for "Automatic" vs "Managed" property? In this thread it was suggested that via the following logic, Automatic vs Managed property can be defined. '---

Issues when using GZIPPED_XML and report download V201309

Good Afternoon Googlers, I am experiencing problems using GZIPPED_XML report output format. Cannot open programmatic or with WinRAR, so worried that for very large reports I will have to download without compression. SOAP Request Info: POST https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/reportdownlo

AdWords API Reporting Problems

Good Morning All, I have the following SOAP Request, authentication hidden, which is never returning that the report is finished. Pending forever and we had this client's report returning Saturday for 4/9/2010 data w/o a problem. So in summary we have a handful of clients with reports never tran

ReportDefinition

I've attempted to build a report definition, via following the July 13 article on the AdWordsAPI blog. I'm a .NET developer using the wsdl.exe and then performing the clean up of the generated stub class as outlined in the NoClientLibrary wiki article, which was a savior for my initial migration o

Re: ReportDefinition

range and get daily breakout, without multiple reports? Please let me know how to keep this simple and run a report over a date range to obtain metrics by Date|Campaign|AdGroup|Keyword. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. On Aug 19, 10:45 am, "okiebug1...@gmail.com" wrote: > I

Re: ReportDefinition

out how users are finding > the new v201003 reporting system, so please continue to let us know > your feedback. > > Best, > - Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team > > On Aug 19, 2:23 pm, "okiebug1...@gmail.com" > wrote: > > > > > I have found and fixed iss

Re: API v201003 and Report Definition for daily performance

Niki, At this time it is not available. I too thought it odd that a feature present in V1-V13 of the API for daily aggregation as well as reporting at Campaign|AdGroup and Keyword level to be omitted in V201003 (V200909 did not include reporting methods). We have been asked to provide feedback to

Reports fields no longer need /1000000

Hello, I wanted to verify the treatment of money fields in all the report definitions. After getting the definitions and supporting database tables set up for our clients and massaging the returned fields to include Campaign and AdGroup names, I noticed we no longer need to divide by 100 for t

Re: ReportDefinition

Hi David, > > > I will take your concerns to the appropriate teams within Google.  No > > sunset date has been announced for the v13 ReportService yet, and when > > it is announced customers will have at least 4-6 months to migrate > > their applications. > > &

Re: Reports fields no longer need /1000000

), looks like this issue is specific to v102003 reports . I've > reported this issue to the AdWords team, I'll update you once I hear > from them. > > Cheers, > Anash P. Oommen, > AdWords API Advisor. > > On Aug 31, 8:02 pm, "okiebug1...@gmail.com" >

Re: ReportDefinition

anomalies though. > > Best, > - Eric > > On Sep 2, 1:09 pm, "okiebug1...@gmail.com" > wrote: > > > > > Thanks much for this info Ewan, this will speed up my report > > processing in a big way.  The mandate to retrieve the names of the > > keywords

Reporting Problems for Remarketing Campaigns

Hello, I have isolated problems with Keyword Performance Reporting from both V2009 and V201008 that began on Feb 10. Up to Feb 9, all my clients Remarketing Campaigns were successfully reporting data via the API. Beginning on Feb 10th the Campaigns with remarketing data have not been returned the

Re: Reporting Problems for Remarketing Campaigns

V201008 problem and not date specific, sorry about that. After further research, I am finding the date coincides with my apps migration to V201008. So.. when will V201008 Keyword Performance Reporting be patched? On Mar 1, 10:04 am, "okiebug1...@gmail.com" wrote: > Hello, >

Re: Reporting Problems for Remarketing Campaigns

Appreciate the feedback. Loads of programming work. When will Google API team address this shortcoming and rectify? Going through a more detailed examination, it only occurs for these remarketing campaigns that have no keywords. In the past the infamous "boomuserlist" was reported. I'm moving

Re: Reporting Problems for Remarketing Campaigns

Google, any status updates, please. On Mar 1, 3:46 pm, "okiebug1...@gmail.com" wrote: > Appreciate the feedback.  Loads of programming work.  When will Google > API team address this shortcoming and rectify? > > Going through a more detailed examination, it only occurs f

Re: Reporting Problems for Remarketing Campaigns

Thank you, I understand the lack of support at this time, and do not require any additional performance data, such as CriterionUserLists as you mentioned, "boomuserlist" works fine as a place holder. Sorry if this was not made clear in my plead for assistance. We are simply after the data and am p

Re: V13 Report Service - Sunset

I am hoping that they will keep V13 running until they have the new versions working for Remarketing Campaigns that are w/o keywords, since this is the only version that works! On Mar 5, 1:03 am, Remya wrote: > Hello Google Adwords Team > > I would like to ask some queries regarding v13 Report S

OAUTH2 201206 .NET

I'm trying to schedule migration for my reporting apps. I successfully moved all my Google Analytics data webservice consumption from the client log-in to OAUTH2. In order to achieve this I needed to register my "Installed App" at https://code.google.com/apis/console and use the Client ID and

Re: OAUTH2 201206 .NET

I appreciate your feedback. I notice the format for the webservices' SOAP message header is a bit different for AdWords than it is for GA. If possible can you point me to the documentation for the AdWords OAuth2 please? In GA, we are adding the following header to our SOAP message, "Authoriz

Re: OAUTH2 201206 .NET

I have my refresh token and am receiving a 400 - bad request when attempting to get report id. Can you please point me to the documentation for the proper headers needed to make requests? You mentioned the need for an Authorization: Bearer xxx and I am unsure of the proper format. I am usin

Re: OAUTH2 201206 .NET

I found the solution, once I removed the "=" for the header "Authorization: Bearer nn". David On Monday, October 8, 2012 8:22:05 AM UTC-4, okieb...@gmail.com wrote: > > I have my refresh token and am receiving a 400 - bad request when > attempting to get report id. > > Can you please point

KEYWORDS_PERFORMANCE_REPORT incomplete data fix estimate

Due to incomplete report data from the KEYWORDS_PERFORMANCE_REPORT I was forced to migrate backwards to V13 back in March. I really hate using the inefficient V13 when the V201008 and V201101 are optimized via use of the report definition feature, and would love to know when the KEYWORDS_PERFORMAN

KEYWORDS_PERFORMANCE_REPORT patch time frame

I have just read that the V13 is due to sunset in a calculated time. I've been forced to use this version due to the well documented short- comings of the new API's KEYWORDS_PERFORMANCE_REPORT. Will the patch for the incomplete data from the KEYWORDS_PERFORMANCE_REPORT be deployed prior to the sun

Re: KEYWORDS_PERFORMANCE_REPORT patch time frame

Sorry for the delay Anash, hope this link suffices for background on this issue: http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api/browse_frm/thread/61893660f41895c/0e0e2be554eb6c5e?lnk=gst&q=okiebug1399#0e0e2be554eb6c5e One can also review posts from me beginning in the Feb/March 2011 time frame to loca

Re: Missing content network data for keyword reports

Hi Stefan, this incomplete data issue seems to be a common problem for Keyword Performance Reporting (KPR) versions after V13. I've been working/lobbying since March, another board member Reed has provided support to my pleas, to get a patch for the KPR post V13 so that it returns 100% complete da

Re: Missing content network data for keyword reports

Hello Google, Do you have any additional information on the timeline as well as sunset dates for the last working version V13? Appreciate all your assistance, David Kelly On Jun 20, 12:52 pm, David Torres wrote: > Hi All, > > I'll make sure all this information is communicated to my team, we ar

Re: Missing content network data for keyword reports

Thanks Kevin, I was attempting to get an update from David Torres's post from late June, and did not think I was bringing up a new topic. Can you follow up with David on his findings as per his post, please? Hi All, I'll make sure all this information is communicated to my team, we are in

Re: Keyword Performance report missing CreativeId (was available in v13)

I believe there are numerous issues with the V201101 when compared to the V13 in regards to Keyword Performance reporting. A bunch of developers on this forum are waiting for the patch to be released for the V201101 to address the well documented short-comings. As a work around, it has been s

Re: Difference between adwords API v13 and v2011 in Keywords Reporting

Ian, The V2011 KPR currently is not backward compatible with V13 and earlier versions. Google has been made aware of this and as of July 26th: "Unfortunately, we do not have any updates at this time regarding a dedicated report for criteria." A few links concerning http://groups.google.com/group

V201101 AdGroup bids is Nothing

I have been using V201008 and have started migrating to V201101 and immediately was stumped on where my AdGroup.bids have gone? What is the secret to obtaining the bids when using the AdGroupService to obtain/get an Adgroup. The selector.fields was my first thought and to add "bids" but it does n

V201101 CampaignCriterion and Keyword.text missing

OK, next up when using the V201101 web service to obtain the campaign level negative keywords, I obtain the match type but not the text. Another method that is not backward compatible w/o documentation outlining - so I assume it is a break that I should be reporting to the dev team. Please don't s

Re: V201101 AdGroup bids is Nothing

Thanks much! Your last link is invaluable for exposing the proper field names per service and am busy with my new slector.fields logic updates. This should allow me to make the migration ahead of the end of life. A huge sigh of relief, even though I knew I was making a silly error, and knew you

MCC OAuth Long Lived Token Generation for Reporting

While attending the API WorkShop in NYC, one of the Google team was discussing a method for returning a long lived access token for the AdWords API scope, to use for Reporting. One could then store in DB and present in place of the OAuth "dance" flow to obtain the token. I've gone through the work

Re: MCC OAuth Long Lived Token Generation for Reporting

Thanks for the reply Kevin. I've reviewed the docs you've referenced, and could not find the method to generate a long-lived access token - one that does not require continued refresh token exchanges. I was looking for an interactive panel to perform the OAuth2 dance; after completing I would

Re: MCC OAuth Long Lived Token Generation for Reporting

Thanks for the confirmation, explains my issues with OAuth2 and long lived tokens. -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

Re: Axis doesn't generate TargetingIdea class from WSDL

Kevin, Sorry to hijack this thread, but the same problem exists with both wsdl.exe and svcutil.exe for this class generation from the provided wsdl. TargetingService class is not generated and the TargetingIdeaPage references unwrapped definition. As pointed out the TargetingIdeaPage generates

Re: Axis doesn't generate TargetingIdea class from WSDL

I appreciate your time and of course the link! Another step for me to add to my documentation for generating classes from the published wsdl. Perhaps you can have all the affected WSDL's modified upon your next release, to add the http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"/> So AdWords API developers

Re: Dynamic Search Ads missing in Ad Performance Report

Hello Kevin, Please keep this thread alive for updates on Google's progress in adding this mission critical missing data to the reporting web services. We cannot balance to invoices and keep our "bean counters" happy without it. This is very similar to Google's Remarketing Campaigns' launch,

Re: conversionsManyPerClick deprecation

I just tested with v201206's adhoc report type CRITERIA_PERFORMANCE_REPORT and had convManyPerClick returned. On Monday, July 9, 2012 12:04:32 PM UTC-4, neilpaterson wrote: > > Hi > > I notice > herethat > conversionsManyPerCli

V201506 and Criteria Performance Report

After migration to V201506, I am unable to balance API numbers to portal. End of month blues. I'be been able to isolate the out of balance to "criteriaType" = Product Partition. Unfortunately not all Campaigns/adGroups are out of balance, which make researching difficult. I reviewed V201506