> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwnt
I went the other way a couple months ago and got a diesel. Me and three
others got plowed by a semi driver not paying attention doing about 40mph
while we were all basically stopped in a construction zone. I was last in
line. Enough damage that my insurance co totaled my 2011 Silverado and cut
a ch
I played around with Hyper-V Server a bit and wasn't real thrilled with it.
That was a couple years ago now though.
I switched to XCP-ng about a year ago after Citrix crippled XenServer.
Installed it right over the top on a couple nodes and had zero issues. All
the bells and whistles back without
820C/S most definitely tie DC plug + to chassis. Believe me. I smoked a
RackInjector PDU board not paying attention. POE into those is floating.
They'll basically take any 4pr scheme you throw at it. I have a couple
820S's running on AirFiber POE bricks.
Yes, I still do red for +24, orange for +48
Got a RackInjector that's acting weird. I believe it's on the latest
version. But ICMP latency to it is all over the place (vs others that
respond 1ms or less continuously). HTTP responds-ish, sometimes. Pages
won't fully load. Then it will eventually not respond at all. Give it a
while and it will
Cambium is sooo *NOT* Motorola anymore. And I don't think it's fair for us
to keep throwing that in their face. There's still some Motorola technical
DNA, and that is good. Just my opinion.
*George Skorup*
*Network Engineer*
(219)326-5252 x7105
<https://www.surfbroadband.com/
Josh Baird wrote:
> Do tell. Number of SM's and throughput for the sector?!
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:22 PM George Skorup
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, RackInjetor w/ PDU card.
>>
>> There are, umm, a *lot* of SMs on that sector which is why it's pulling
>
Yes, RackInjetor w/ PDU card.
There are, umm, a *lot* of SMs on that sector which is why it's pulling
125-140 watts. And man is that MU-MIMO puttin in work.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:09 PM Steve Jones
wrote:
> is that the packetflux interface?
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:05 PM
Better put on your rectifier pants
[image: image.png]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:33 PM Ken Hohhof wrote:
> There is also the power consumption issue with the 3 GHz 450m. Spec sheet
> says 140W typical. That’s a lot, 560 watts for 4 sectors. Especially at
> sites where I only have a 360 watt po
Yes. Most sites were tracking either zero or 1-2 GLONASS sats until they
all suddenly came back this afternoon.
GLONASS was not tracking nearly as many sats during the PRN#29 event
either, or we wouldn't have had so many issues. We had many RackInjectors
showing a 2D lock and no timing pulse. 2 GL
...That they want to admit...
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 5:14 PM Brian Webster
wrote:
> This page lists the US GPS system status, showing nothing out of the
> ordinary from what I can tell.
>
>
>
> https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?Do=constellationStatus
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Brian Webster
>
> www.
I don't see a leap second being introduced today. No problems reported at
GPS.gov either. Clearly something triggered a bug in the latest GTop
receivers that Forrest, Cambium and others are using. I'm seeing low SNR
and a lot less tracked GLONASS sats after this event.
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 4:52
inal Message-
> From: AF On Behalf Of George Skorup
> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 10:32 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MTU settings on CFIP Lumina FODU - v2.71.07
>
> I believe the Lumina supports 9600-byte jumbo frames.
>
> On Mon, Se
total throughput;
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 9:32 PM George Skorup wrote:
>
> I believe the Lumina supports 9600-byte jumbo frames.
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:55 PM Paul McCall wrote:
> >
> > We have some SAF CFIP Lumina FODU - v2.71.07 that I am wanting to verify
> > th
I believe the Lumina supports 9600-byte jumbo frames.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:55 PM Paul McCall wrote:
>
> We have some SAF CFIP Lumina FODU - v2.71.07 that I am wanting to verify the
> MTU settings on. Looking to make sure that the MTU is 2000 or better.
>
>
>
> Not seeing an option for it in
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-FAQ/Cable-Diagram-for-450i-and-450m-to-UGPS/m-p/52198#U52198
On 6/7/2019 12:58 PM, Carl Peterson wrote:
Anyone have the pinouts to make a JR AUX to legacy 450 timing cable?
We have a 450 with a fritzy gps and only have JR AUX in stock.
Forrest says
ake a GPON transition easier? Not saying you're wrong; I
just don't get it.
On 5/29/2019 5:46 PM, George Skorup wrote:
1310/1490 is the GPON uplink/downlink wavelengths. I have a number of
those FS modules deployed in Planet switches to talk to Calix 844GE's
in BiDi AE mode to make
1310/1490 is the GPON uplink/downlink wavelengths. I have a number of
those FS modules deployed in Planet switches to talk to Calix 844GE's in
BiDi AE mode to make it easier to cut over to GPON later.
On 5/29/2019 4:09 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I'd been buying BiDi's all along that use 1310 and 1
bster
www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com>
www.Broadband-Mapping.com
*From:*AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup
*Sent:* Friday, May 17, 2019 12:22 AM
*To:* af@af.afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Hanoi talkies
Any FCC ID on the back of the r
in
a while. But there's that Part 95 certified device requirement. I see
businesses using the Baofengs and similar on MURS all the time, so
again... who knows/cares.
On 5/16/2019 8:57 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Can I use these cheap HTs on these frequencies?
*From:* George Skorup
*Sent:* Thur
Part 90 business itinerant allows you to do FM-Narrow and/or digital
voice+data (including encryption) across the lower 48 for practically
nothing for 10 years. There are 8 VHF and 8 UHF shared frequencies. Do the
form 601 yourself and pay the FCC. No coordination required. No GMRS
licensing nonsen
Was the 12-port DIN PIPS scrapped? I would still really like to see that
for existing smaller cabinets.
An 8-port injector module + 4-port DIN PIPS + fuse blocks is a lot of
wiring and takes up quite a bit of space. And then I've got only 4 ports
of Canopy Sync. So a 12-port PIPS would be great.
Not sure about a proper term, but typically large front-terminal
batteries like that are designed for telco applications. The idea is to
create a 48 volt bank easily with linking bars between them. Four will
fit side-by-side on a battery shelf in a standard 19" rack. And even
larger ones for st
Still on my wish list...
12-port DIN PIPS, the new hardware with -48 support would be great
Something I really want is a telemetry card for the RackInjector. Couple
relays (could even be n/c only), a shunt input or two, a voltage monitor
or two, and 3 or 4 switch inputs.
4, 5 or even 6ch PDU
Seems related to
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/Low-speed-PMP450-15-1-1-when-connected-6-and-more-SM-ethernet/m-p/76606
On 6/21/2018 8:42 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Has anyone seen a huge jump in ping times to 450-900mhz SM's after you
go beyond 5 SM's on the AP? I am running
Doing the same. It'll work fine.
Management VLAN Access:
Configure the interface(s) through which the management interface of the
SM can be accessed, when a Management VLAN is enabled. By default,
management access is only allowed from the Wireless Interface of the SM.
Basically the same sett
26 matches
Mail list logo
