Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

Wellnobody expects *us *to be humidifier experts.  It might be unfair to call the humidifier people stupid just because they didn't know FCC rules.  I hope for their sake they made more than $590,380 on the humidifiers they sold while they were out of compliance. -Adam On 5/31/2018 2:09

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

I didn’t read the complaint very carefully. Is that what it was? I presumed it was an unintentional radiator issue, not wifi. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 12:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590,380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

It is pretty weird they would choose a noncompliant 2.4/5 GHz wifi module for their products, when plenty of fully compliant packaged modules are available from manufacturers in China. They were either ignorant, stupid, or trying to save 18 cents per manufactured unit. On Thu, May 31, 2018 at

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

I am curious, where is the lower frequency limit for part 15? Or do all electronics sold in the retail space need to be tested for emi etc? From: Tim Hardy Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 11:20 AM To: Subject: [AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590,380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier Well

[AFMUG] FCC Forfeiture $590, 380 for unauthorized Ultrasonic Humidifier

Well, it was little more than just the humidifier but the fines ramp up if you continue to violate the rules even after you have been made aware of the violation. Think this one is an F you, strong message to follow! FCC-18-67A1.pdf

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

On 5/2/18 8:15 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: My guess is that what happened here, is that they updated the firmware, entered the unlock code, didn't apply the sticker, and then purposely set the antenna size wrong so that it would run at much higher power than it should, which I suspect also could

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 5:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action I remember Sterling's find was originally $25K. Not sure what he eventually settled at. -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:21 PM To: af@afm

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

t; <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > -- > *From: *"Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Wednesday, May

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

;http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------ > *From: *"Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *We

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

- Original Message - From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 9:54:33 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action And lends more credibility to the industry as a whole On Wed, May 2, 2018, 9:47 AM Mathew Howard < m

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

uot; >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:30 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> I remember Sterling's find was originally $25K. Not sure what he >>> eventually settled at. >>> >>> -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett >>

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

1, 2018 at 6:30 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> I remember Sterling's find was originally $25K. Not sure what he >> eventually settled at. >> >> -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett >> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:21 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >&g

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

eyinternet.net> *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Wednesday, May 2, 2018 7:43:17 AM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action I tend to agree with you, yet again Mike. Although I still think it is stupid that they didn’t block out that frequency if they knew they were in a radar area. On

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 7:43:17 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action I tend to agree with you, yet agai

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 12:15:33 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action > > wanna get some interesting offlist hate mail? start naming names

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

al Message - From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 12:15:33 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action wanna get some interesting offlist hate mail? start naming names of vendors who sell non US to the U

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

t;> settled at. >> >> -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett >> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:21 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action >> >> I'm pretty sure Microserv had a fine over a misconfigured Mi

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

; > -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett > Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:21 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action > > I'm pretty sure Microserv had a fine over a misconfigured Mikrotik. I > seem to think it was $25k, but my memory is

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

I remember Sterling's find was originally $25K. Not sure what he eventually settled at. -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:21 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action I'm pretty sure Microserv had a fine over a misconfigured

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

" <li...@packetflux.com> To: "af" <af@afmug.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:14:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action I went and pulled the FCC cert for the FCC ID that they gave, definitely only certified for 5.7 in the US. I figure there are two options her

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

;Seth Mattinen" <se...@rollernet.us> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 1:08:55 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action On 5/1/18 10:51, Tim Hardy wrote: > LV.NET <http://LV.NET>; LAS VEGAS, NEVADA �89104. ��Notice of > Unlicensed > Operat

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

There will be a fine - you can count on it as they want to make a point that they take this very seriously. The offender may get a break or reduced fine if he remedied the situation promptly, didn’t makeup some stupid ass excuse, cooperated with and didn’t BS the agents. Sent from my iPad

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Mitch Koep <af...@abwisp.com <mailto:af...@abwisp.com>> Date: 5/1/18 3:14 PM (GMT-06:00) To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action I got into a jam and ordered from Amazon and a third party re sell

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

Yep. From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 4:05 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action We aren’t allowed to sell those without a signed form from the customer, pledging to ship them out of the country. I

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

14 PM (GMT-06:00) > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action > > I got into a jam and ordered from Amazon and a third party re seller sent me > non US products. I had to ship them all back > > Should have waited for my normal supplier LOL > > Mit

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

n would have the U.S. as an option. Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Mitch Koep <af...@abwisp.com <mailto:af...@abwisp.com>> Date: 5/1/18 3:14 PM (GMT-06:00) To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

e > From: Mitch Koep <af...@abwisp.com> > Date: 5/1/18 3:14 PM (GMT-06:00) > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action > > I got into a jam and ordered from Amazon and a third party re seller sent > me > > non US products. I had to sh

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

Mitch Koep <af...@abwisp.com> > Date: 5/1/18 3:14 PM (GMT-06:00) > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action > > I got into a jam and ordered from Amazon and a third party re seller sent > me > > non US products. I had to ship them all back > >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

I always assumed the international version would have the U.S. as an option.  Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Mitch Koep <af...@abwisp.com> Date: 5/1/18 3:14 PM (GMT-06:00) To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

o: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> Sent: 5/1/2018 4:17:27 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action At the bottom I think they said they will consider what, if any fines will be levied. At least that is the way I read it. Thanks, David Coudron david.coud...@advante

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

, Plymouth, MN 55447  |  www.advantenon.com  |  Phone: 800-704-4720  |  Local: 612-454-1545  -Original Message- From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 3:15 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action I noticed there was n

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

I noticed there was no fine mentioned. Does that come later? -- Original Message -- From: "Seth Mattinen" <se...@rollernet.us> To: af@afmug.com Sent: 5/1/2018 2:08:56 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action On 5/1/18 10:51, Tim Hardy wrote: LV.NET <http:/

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

we get non-us radios shipped to us before… *From:*Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian (List Account) *Sent:* Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:15 PM *To:* af <af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action I went and pulled the FCC cert for the FCC ID th

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

I also note, that we ordered US radios, and they were out of stock so we get non-us radios shipped to us before… From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:15 PM To: af <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforceme

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

com> On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:15 PM To: af <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action I went and pulled the FCC cert for the FCC ID that they gave, definitely only certified for 5.7 in the US. I figure there are two opti

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

I went and pulled the FCC cert for the FCC ID that they gave, definitely only certified for 5.7 in the US. I figure there are two options here: 1) They're knowingly using a non-US radio in the US, or they've otherwise hacked the US radio to operate outside of the band. In this case, good luck

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

It says it was a Rocket5 AC Prism... I don't think those ever had updated stickers (I could be wrong, but that's a relatively new design, which I think was after all that nonsense). I wonder if it was the non-US model... On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

On 5/1/18 10:51, Tim Hardy wrote: LV.NET ; LAS VEGAS, NEVADA �89104. ��Notice of Unlicensed Operation and Notification of Harmful Interference issued for interference complaint to FAA Terminal Doppler Weather Radar operating on 5645 MHz in Las Vegas, Nevada. Action by:

[AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

LV.NET ; LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89104. Notice of Unlicensed Operation and Notification of Harmful Interference issued for interference complaint to FAA Terminal Doppler Weather Radar operating on 5645 MHz in Las Vegas, Nevada. Action by: Regional Director, Region Three,

Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

oun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 8:57 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing > > Just 477 > > The reclassification didn’t change the USF status of information services, > and by the same

Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

y > connection? > > From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 8:57 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing > > Just 477 > > The reclassification didn’t change the USF status of

Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

Then why is my upstream provider charging me USF fee on my broadband only connection? From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 8:57 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing Just 477 The reclassification didn’t

Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

gt; Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 6:47 PM > To: 'af@afmug.com' <af@afmug.com> > Subject: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing > > So now I'm digging to this more to make sure I'm on the right track. > > ALL broadband/internet ISP providers are now classified Telecommunication

Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

internet, not VoIP/Telephone services. Is that correct? -Original Message- From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 6:47 PM To: 'af@afmug.com' <af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing So now I'm digging to this

[AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing

So now I'm digging to this more to make sure I'm on the right track. ALL broadband/internet ISP providers are now classified Telecommunications providers and must file FCC 499a or 499q and pay USF if not de-minimus? Is this where we all stand now?

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Growth channel ruling

Time to take a look closely at these. Thanks. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Hardy Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 3:18 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Growth channel ruling GovNet and Telink have numerous paths that were coordinated on every available

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Growth channel ruling

!372345583!484783045?applID=10340856 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 21:54:23 + From: Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Growth channel ruling Message-ID: <f3dbb563c7e74021b603705a86072...@triadwireless.net> Content-Ty

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Growth channel ruling

Interesting. Are you suggesting Govnet also or someone else? Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Hardy Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 6:19 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] FCC Growth channel ruling There’s hope for those of you in the HFT corridors (or even

[AFMUG] FCC Growth channel ruling

There’s hope for those of you in the HFT corridors (or even in Arizona where a certain licensee is laying claim to all of the spectrum) where companies have been warehousing spectrum for years by abusing the coordination process:

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

PR also has a lot less structural timber to build with. If you look at the BNSF trainloads of lumber that roll out of BC, WA, OR on a regular basis destined for other places in the US... The US is actually kind of an anomaly worldwide with so many houses built out of wood. You can sit by the

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

On 3/6/18 6:36 PM, Steve Jones wrote: When your electricity runs you can run pumps. But they run underwater telecomunications, underwater power, etc. Even if the tunnel was left flooded, still better than what happenned. Assuming the island is all bedrock, wouldnt be a terrible hurricaine

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

; >>> Gorra is slang >>> >>> Jaime Solorza >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018, 3:28 PM Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Gorra >>>> >>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on b

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

etpr.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Gorra >>>>> >>>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Jaime Solorza < >>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:33 PM To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion Cachu

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

>>> >>>> Gorra >>>> >>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Jaime Solorza < >>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >>>> Date: Tuesday, March 6,

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

<g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: >> >>> Gorra >>> >>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Jaime Solorza < >>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >>> Date: Tue

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

mug.com" <af@afmug.com> >> Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:33 PM >> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / >> USVItelecomrebuild/expansion >> >> Cachucha >> >> Jaime S

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

com> > Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:33 PM > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / > USVItelecomrebuild/expansion > > Cachucha > > Jaime Solorza > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018, 1:38 PM Carl Peterso

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:33 PM To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion Cachucha Jaime Solorza On Tue, Mar 6, 2018, 1:38 PM Carl Peterson <

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

tation, he says "hat-o"... > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> If that doesn’t work just say it again louder. >> >> *From:* Mathew Howard >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2018 1:22 PM >> *To:* af >>

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

t doesn’t work just say it again louder. > > *From:* Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2018 1:22 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / > USVItelecomrebuild/expansion > > I found that I could get by just fine in PR with pointing and gru

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion

If that doesn’t work just say it again louder. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 1:22 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVItelecomrebuild/expansion I found that I could get by just fine in PR with pointing and grunting... On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecomrebuild/expansion

t; wrote: > >> Si, yo hablo--- como un nino pequeno. >> >> *From:* Jaime Solorza >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2018 12:52 PM >> *To:* Animal Farm >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI >> telecomrebuild/expansion >> >>

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecomrebuild/expansion

Ah..entonces hablas la verdad Jaime Solorza On Tue, Mar 6, 2018, 1:15 PM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > Si, yo hablo--- como un nino pequeno. > > *From:* Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2018 12:52 PM > *To:* Animal Farm > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecomrebuild/expansion

Si, yo hablo--- como un nino pequeno. From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 12:52 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecomrebuild/expansion Me too...and since Chuck speaks Spanish, no need from translator fees.. Jaime Solorza On Tue

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecom rebuild/expansion

Villarini >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2018 12:31 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecom >> rebuild/expansion >> >> Interesting >> >> #PaiMoney >> >> https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-hurric

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecom rebuild/expansion

t:* Tuesday, March 06, 2018 12:31 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecom > rebuild/expansion > > Interesting > > #PaiMoney > > > https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-hurricane-communications/fcc-wants-nearly-1-billion-

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecom rebuild/expansion

They should just give it all to you. If they do, I can help you spend it... From: Gino A. Villarini Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 12:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecom rebuild/expansion Interesting #PaiMoney https://www.reuters.com/article

[AFMUG] FCC Pai proposes $1B for PR / USVI telecom rebuild/ expansion

Interesting #PaiMoney https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-hurricane-communications/fcc-wants-nearly-1-billion-to-revamp-puerto-rico-virgin-islands-communications-networks-idUSKCN1GI2EN?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content_content=5a9ee78904d30133ffd0af8a_medium=trueAnthem_source=twitter

Re: [AFMUG] FCC license?

to you and use your server? > > -Original Message- From: David Thake > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 8:40 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC license? > > > Thank you for your reply. > > Wouldn’t that apply if you were the one selling to

Re: [AFMUG] FCC license?

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC license? Thank you for your reply. Wouldn’t that apply if you were the one selling to the end user? Likewise, if I export product to the US, it would be the importer who would have to have trading permits, import licences etc. D On 28 Feb 2018, at 16:34, Adam Moffett

Re: [AFMUG] FCC license?

I couldn't say. -- Original Message -- From: "David Thake" <dth...@ms.vanilla.net.mt> To: af@afmug.com Sent: 2/28/2018 10:40:58 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC license? Thank you for your reply. Wouldn’t that apply if you were the one selling to the end user? Likew

Re: [AFMUG] FCC license?

are selling a telephone service within the US, I find it likely that > Uncle Sam will want a piece of your pie. > -Adam > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "David Thake" <dth...@ms.vanilla.net.mt> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: 2/28/2018 3:58:29 AM >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC license?

that Uncle Sam will want a piece of your pie. -Adam -- Original Message -- From: "David Thake" <dth...@ms.vanilla.net.mt> To: af@afmug.com Sent: 2/28/2018 3:58:29 AM Subject: [AFMUG] FCC license? Hi Guys, Do you know if we need any special FCC permit to sell SIP service

Re: [AFMUG] FCC license?

No permit but there are taxes, reporting, and filling you have to do. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018, 12:58 AM David Thake wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Do you know if we need any special FCC permit to sell SIP services to a US > based ISP? > > We are based in Malta in the EU. > >

[AFMUG] FCC license?

Hi Guys, Do you know if we need any special FCC permit to sell SIP services to a US based ISP? We are based in Malta in the EU. Thanks David Thake www.vanilla.net.mt www.cempilli.com

Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing common carrier or non-common carrier?

I seem to remember it is like a grand or so but we did it years ago. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Keefe John wrote: > How much does that cost anyways? > > Keefe > > > > On 2/21/2018 12:11 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > >> So I'm in the process of applying for the

Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing common carrier or non-common carrier?

$545 for the FCC license. There may also be a fee for registering the individual links, but I haven't gotten that far yet. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Keefe John wrote: > How much does that cost anyways? > > Keefe > > > > On 2/21/2018 12:11 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing common carrier or non-common carrier?

Non common carrier...unless you like red tape, then go for the common carrier ;) On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:11 AM Mathew Howard wrote: > So I'm in the process of applying for the non-exclusive nationwide license > that we apparently need for e-band links... as a plain

Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing common carrier or non-common carrier?

How much does that cost anyways? Keefe On 2/21/2018 12:11 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: So I'm in the process of applying for the non-exclusive nationwide license that we apparently need for e-band links... as a plain ordinary WISP, should I be checking the "common carrier" or "non-common

Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing common carrier or non-common carrier?

Thanks! That's about what I thought, but I couldn't find a clear answer anywhere. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: > Non common carrier...unless you like red tape, then go for the common > carrier ;) > > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:11 AM Mathew Howard

[AFMUG] FCC licensing common carrier or non-common carrier?

So I'm in the process of applying for the non-exclusive nationwide license that we apparently need for e-band links... as a plain ordinary WISP, should I be checking the "common carrier" or "non-common carrier" check box?

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

Nah, I'm pretty sure it can handle at least five searches at once... well, four anyway. Don't underestimate the Commodore 64! On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > i think if two of us do a ULS search at once it effectively DOS the FCC > doesnt it, i

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

Ha. Lol Jaime Solorza On Dec 14, 2017 9:07 PM, "Steve Jones" wrote: > i think if two of us do a ULS search at once it effectively DOS the FCC > doesnt it, i mean the commodore 64 they run on only has so much beef > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

i think if two of us do a ULS search at once it effectively DOS the FCC doesnt it, i mean the commodore 64 they run on only has so much beef On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > Wonder how long before someone brings down FCC website or start DOS >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

Wonder how long before someone brings down FCC website or start DOS attacks on wannabe a star chairman? Pity I don't possess those skills Jaime Solorza On Dec 14, 2017 11:31 AM, "Steve Jones" wrote: lock stock and barrel. You have to remember, we have been

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

lock stock and barrel. You have to remember, we have been declining as a people over the last decade, one big herd of sheep. crazy thing is, NN applies only to the US, these idiots arent just dumb, theyre arrogant enough to think the US is the internet You cant cure stupid On Thu, Dec 14, 2017

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

"The end of the Internet as we know it"come on. People are really falling for this shit? On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > stupid children making bomb threats cause they arent going to get their way > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Kurt

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

stupid children making bomb threats cause they arent going to get their way On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > They have dogs going through the room searching for something: > https://www.facebook.com/wjlatv/videos/10156020401533734/ > > On Thu,

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

They have dogs going through the room searching for something: https://www.facebook.com/wjlatv/videos/10156020401533734/ On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > *advice > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

Anyone seen Steve. Where did Steve go... From: Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:49 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live *advice On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: The speaker just got

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

*advice On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > The speaker just got a note and it said "on advise of security we need to > take a brief recess" and the video just shut down > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

The speaker just got a note and it said "on advise of security we need to take a brief recess" and the video just shut down On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > just started listening in and they are quoting WISPA members in the > argument

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

just started listening in and they are quoting WISPA members in the argument against NN On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > according to social media, the nazis are coming for our papers and the > internet will cost us each 1 trillion dollars, and

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

according to social media, the nazis are coming for our papers and the internet will cost us each 1 trillion dollars, and we basically are going to die if they end nn On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Steve wrote: > https://www.fcc.gov/general/live > > They are debating

[AFMUG] FCC Debate Live

https://www.fcc.gov/general/live They are debating the whole Net Neutrality thing

Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing for dummies

(305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 2:10:15 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing for dummies > It’s new work. But maybe only $1500 or

Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing for dummies

It’s new work. But maybe only $1500 or less for the FCC paperwork. There’s no loopholes to be had. Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Dec 14, 2017, at 12:01 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > So, as long as you're using the same channels, it's basically just

Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing for dummies

I like intellipath, but its probably better our vendor uses another. Ive seen Liz Linkdn profile pic, and I drink. If I received a 1 am email from her, id probably respond irresponsibly at that time of day On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:16 AM, George Skorup wrote: > A path

Re: [AFMUG] FCC licensing for dummies

so, thats the B answer, I have no problem with that What about the A? Im not looking to skirt the system, Im too afraid of "the man" Im always going to go B, Im just very curious. Like a well behaved housewife standing by the oven looking out the window, while the neighbors wife, Linda is throwing

  1   2   3   4   >