M
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
Really, 220 Mbps in a 40 MHz channel? That’s a bunch for something based on an
802.11n PHY.
I think the regular Force 110 spec sheet says 150M, does the GPS sync version
really say 220M? I’m not disputing it, just surprised/amazed.
From: Jo
re so many ePMP variants.
I assume the lesser model is limited by CPU, not RF?
*From:* George Skorup <mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 5:02 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
ePMP is 64QAM. 256 would be nice,
t;>>> OK, ignore me, I seem to be having a bad math day.
>>>> Also trying to grasp the concept of actually using a 40 MHz channel.
>>>> But I was also remembering an ePMP data sheet with a 150 Mbps number.
>>>> Probably because there are so many ePMP va
trying to grasp the concept of actually using a 40 MHz channel.
>>> But I was also remembering an ePMP data sheet with a 150 Mbps number.
>>> Probably because there are so many ePMP variants.
>>> I assume the lesser model is limited by CPU, not RF?
>>>
>
lly using a 40 MHz channel.
>> But I was also remembering an ePMP data sheet with a 150 Mbps number.
>> Probably because there are so many ePMP variants.
>> I assume the lesser model is limited by CPU, not RF?
>>
>> *From:* George Skorup
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, Jul
nel.
> But I was also remembering an ePMP data sheet with a 150 Mbps number.
> Probably because there are so many ePMP variants.
> I assume the lesser model is limited by CPU, not RF?
>
> *From:* George Skorup
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 5:02 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:*
: George Skorup
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 5:02 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
ePMP is 64QAM. 256 would be nice, but there's always the PTP450 for that, which
of course is limited to 20MHz though. I have a 10 mile ePMP link on 2' dishes
running
g.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
>
>
> 220 would be perfect. I've had nothing but great RF performance. Did you
> see my story about going from Beams to force110?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
thman <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 1:23 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
And Mimosa is...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 21
DFS and 10MHz
> channels.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:31 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
>
>
>
> The answer you are looking
>
> (209)838-1221 x108
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:58 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
>
>
>
>
> http://community.cambiumnetw
;
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 1:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
And Mimosa is...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 21, 2015 2:19 PM, "Ken Hohhof" mailto:af
Thanks for the link :D
Josh Heide
Network Engineer
Velociter Wireless, Inc.
(209)838-1221 x108
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:58 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
http
> No I did not do you got a link
>
>
>
> Josh Heide
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Velociter Wireless, Inc.
>
> (209)838-1221 x108
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:15 AM
> *
: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
And Mimosa is...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 21, 2015 2:19 PM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote:
Really, 220 Mbps in a 40 MHz channel? That’s a bunch for something based on
an 802.11n
No I did not do you got a link
Josh Heide
Network Engineer
Velociter Wireless, Inc.
(209)838-1221 x108
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
220 would be perfect
Yup http://www.epmpwireless.com/pdf/Force_110_PTP.pdf
Josh Heide
Network Engineer
Velociter Wireless, Inc.
(209)838-1221 x108
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:19 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
Really
regular Force 110 spec sheet says 150M, does the GPS sync
> version really say 220M? I’m not disputing it, just surprised/amazed.
>
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 1:15 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
>
&
: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
220 would be perfect. I've had nothing but great RF performance. Did you see
my story about going from Beams to force110?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 21,
220 would be perfect. I've had nothing but great RF performance. Did you
see my story about going from Beams to force110?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 21, 2015 1:51 PM, "Joshua Heide" wrote:
> Looking into these units. Wo
We love epmp here we may start doing away with ubnt
We have 20/20 fiber at one site. And we get full throughput with no issues
On Jul 21, 2015 12:52 PM, "Joshua Heide" wrote:
> Looking into these units. Wondering what kind of throughput people are
> getting with these. Are you getting the 220mb
Looking into these units. Wondering what kind of throughput people are getting
with these. Are you getting the 220mbps real world throughput that they claim?
Josh Heide
Network Engineer
Velociter Wireless, Inc.
(209)838-1221 x108
22 matches
Mail list logo
