om:* Adam Moffett
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2016 3:05 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
>
> Out of curiosity Chuck, was that a State or Federal regulator?
>
>
> On 2/4/2016 12:41 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> Di
FCC Staffer.
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 3:05 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
Out of curiosity Chuck, was that a State or Federal regulator?
On 2/4/2016 12:41 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Directly from the mouth of one of the
bsidies were part of the valuation.
*From:* Chuck McCown <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
*Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:24 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
Yeahbut, the welfare check is tied to providing dial tone, but
times goes on but they
will also be raising the speed limit.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:53 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
I don’t see how they fund it all without expanding the USF contribution base to
include broadband. It
people to
pay for their own broadband or move to the city. Maybe if Trump wins, he’ll
get Mexico to pay for it.
From: Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:41 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
Directly from the mouth of one of the key regulators
40
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2016 12:19 AM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" >> <mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm
no upside to claiming more than
> you
> > can do on a 477 turf wise or speed wise but there is a big downside.
> >
> > From: Cameron Crum
> > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 8:10 AM
> > To: af@afmug.com
> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage
uot;
mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote:
Hmmm.news to me
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Josh Luthman" mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>
To: mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: [AFMUG] who is using tow
that is how they
feel.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:36 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
Virtually all of northern Illinois is already marked as served. But I think
the ILECs did this to themselves by lying about their speeds
valuation.
From: Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:24 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
Yeahbut, the welfare check is tied to providing dial tone, but can be taken
away by an unsubsidized broadband competitor overlapping the turf.
From
, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
> FTTH. Lots of nice RUS loans available at zero percent interest for the
> rural ILECS to upgrade.
>
> *From:* Josh Reynolds
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:25 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Who is using to
FTTH. Lots of nice RUS loans available at zero percent interest for the rural
ILECS to upgrade.
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:25 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
So what happens now that broadband is 25/x and practically
XSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------
> *From: *"Chuck McCown"
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Thursday, February 4, 2016 11:10:48 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
>
> There are already FCC cases on the books where both s
o: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
I don't think that's true of broadband. Frontier and AT&T DSL only goes to
where it goes. If you are in their territory but beyond the DSL limit or on
a loaded pair, sorry Charlie, no broadband for you. In fact, AT&am
e turf.
>
> *From:* Mike Hammett
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:14 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
>
> A duty to serve... phone... not broadband.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computin
Yeahbut, the welfare check is tied to providing dial tone, but can be taken
away by an unsubsidized broadband competitor overlapping the turf.
From: Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:14 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
A duty to serve
: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:10 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
There are already FCC cases on the books where both sides did drive testing and
the WISP lost.
Based on subscription level should be fine. Some wisps just draw a 20 mile arc
around each AP and
;s
what we see in Illinois.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:08 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
ILECs have their maps defined by the state regulators, so while their actual
broadband coverage in their turf may
;
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 11:10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
There are already FCC cases on the books where both sides did drive testing and
the WISP lost.
Based on subscription level should be fine. Some wisps just draw a 20 mile arc
arou
ier.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:10 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
What you basically just said is that WISPs can't lie about their
coverage areas despite 50% of the maps of the LECs, ca
AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
Not sure how they would do “drive testing”. You actually have experienced this
happening? Or you mean challenges? I thought they were using the lazy method
like assuming if no one had ported out a POTS line to you, then
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:10 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
What you basically just said is that WISPs can't lie about their
coverage areas despite 50% of the maps of the LECs, cablecos, and
larger WISPs being total bul
a big downside.
From: Cameron Crum
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 8:10 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
I'm not sure even areas as small as census blocks groups allow you to be
surgically accurate.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Chuck M
ter be getting surgically accurate on your 477
>> filings. You do sign them under penalty of perjury and there will be
>> telcos challenging your coverage data.
>>
>> *From:* Dennis Burgess
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2016 7:07 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>
t; Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 8:10 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
>
> I'm not sure even areas as small as census blocks groups allow you to be
> surgically accurate.
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Chuck McCown
: Cameron Crum
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 8:10 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
I'm not sure even areas as small as census blocks groups allow you to be
surgically accurate.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I would say
ere will be
> telcos challenging your coverage data.
>
> *From:* Dennis Burgess
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2016 7:07 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
>
>
> We also do the Form 477, i.e. broadband deployment data as we
, 2016 8:03 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
+1000
for this solution.. Unless you invest the time and effort to build a custom
solution like towercoverage I dont complain about the number of customers it
has brought to us and
the countless times it has
f David
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 8:03 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com?
+1000
for this solution.. Unless you invest the time and effort to build a custom
solution like towercoverage I dont complain about the number of customers it
has brought to us and
t
Fuller
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 9:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
suggestion - take our antenna plots directly from pokeycode, i mean powercode,
and automatically populate all our towers in towercoverage... :)
- Original Message -
Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Josh Luthman" mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>
To: mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com
<http://towercoverage.com>?
Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2016 10:22 PM
gt;
> - Reply message -
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> To:
> Subject: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
> Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2016 10:22 PM
>
> Uh you can dude. Been a while since they enabled that.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-23
take our antenna plots directly from pokeycode, i mean
>>>> powercode, and automatically populate all our towers in towercoverage... :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>> *From:* Dennis Burgess
>>>> *T
Hmmm.news to me
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To:
Subject: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2016 10:22 PM
Uh you can dude. Been a while since they enabled that.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-23
tenna plots directly from pokeycode, i mean
>>> powercode, and automatically populate all our towers in towercoverage... :)
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -
>>> *From:* Dennis Burgess
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 03, 2016
; *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 03, 2016 8:51 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
>>
>> Thanks for all of the kind comments and suggestions. The pricing is the
>> same as since its inception, we have
t; *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 03, 2016 8:51 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
>
> Thanks for all of the kind comments and suggestions. The pricing is the
> same as since its inception, we have a dedicated staff to answer questions
> as well a
Technologies, Inc.
den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:31 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
wow, the
t
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy
> /sarcasm
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:31 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
>
>
>
> wow, the pricing is a whole lot more realistic t
<mailto:den...@linktechs.net> – 314-735-0270 x103 –
www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:31 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.co
PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
Normally lead generation and prospective customer qualification would be part
of a CRM or Salesforce Automation system, not a Billing system.
It sounds like you are using the term Billing System to describe an all-in-one
business automat
greeting on your phone that says Press 1 for Billing, Press 1 for Sales,
Press 1 for Support, or remain on the line to hear these choices again.
From: Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 8:15 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
Oh
Oh...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 8:09:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.
therswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --------------
> *From: *"Josh Luthman"
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Wednesday, February 3, 2016 7:46:24 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com >
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:27:51 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com ?
$25/mo is n
hebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --------------
> *From: *"Josh Luthman"
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:27:51 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercover
Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com?
$25/mo is not much. I strongly recommend signing up for it simply for the EUS
form. If you get ONE customer out of the purchase, you made money. Any more
than that is gravy.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne
that was the problem, no amount of manipulation would get the los numbers
anywhere near right, the answer was copy and pasted from them every single
time.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> So much this, too. It puts a lead into Powercode so I can see where
> interest
>
> Jos
So much this, too. It puts a lead into Powercode so I can see where
interest
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 3, 2016 7:14 PM, "Kurt Fankhauser" wrote:
> I have used it for over a year and love it, the biggest benefit is it
>
I have used it for over a year and love it, the biggest benefit is it gives
me a way to historically keep track of people that want service, even if I
can't service them, I can always go on the map and see where the potential
customers that want service are and I can build to them. I don't even use
Good data in = good data out!
I went thru our network and plotted all our APs. I then went thru and
validated already installed clients to see if the signal matched the
model's prediction. If it was more than +\- 3db then I went and changed the
model to match the real world.
It is now very accur
wow, the pricing is a whole lot more realistic than it used to be, still
expensive if you wanted to plot every antenna, but omni will get you the
gist of it. hopefully their support is better than a repetitive canned
response now
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> $25/mo is no
$25/mo is not much. I strongly recommend signing up for it simply for the
EUS form. If you get ONE customer out of the purchase, you made money.
Any more than that is gravy.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:
good luck with that. The only response youll get is The results you get
will only be as valid is the information you put into it
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Tim Reichhart <
timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote:
> Who on this list is using towercoverage.com? I want to know how accurate
> it i
Who on this list is using towercoverage.com? I want to know how accurate it is
because I have an account now with them and I am doubt its very accurate to
give out an good signal from my tower. Because I really hate spending 25
dollars per month and its not going to be accurate.
Tim
55 matches
Mail list logo
