Mine, as I’ve said, is literally a JavaScript to Java translation of Arthur’s
JavaScript "mind."
What’s tinybrain? How does it work?
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Stefan Reich via AGI
wrote:
>> My Java mind
>
> Hold on! What? *I* am making a Java mind. Where's
> My Java mind
Hold on! What? *I* am making a Java mind. Where's your source? Mine is
here: http://tinybrain.de/1016060
Stefan
MP via AGI schrieb am Di., 5. Juni 2018 19:03:
> John, I definitely feel the same way about the massive obscurities. I even
> tried muddling through his diagrams and
John, I definitely feel the same way about the massive obscurities. I even
tried muddling through his diagrams and explanations to no avail. What I was
able to do is port his ungodly bizarre code to java - literally copying and
pasting with a few syntax tweaks - and got it running... somewhat.
Arthur,
Every time you start posting about your "AI Mind" app I briefly go and look at
the JS source, "View page source" from the web browser, and here are a few
thoughts (after working with thousands of source codes over the years, and
instead of me just saying "If there were an example of
I assumed it was showing progress, not a form of "trolling." Your work, while
immensely difficult for me to understand (as I’ve privately discussed) is still
nonetheless fascinating from afar. Keep it up!
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:30 AM, A.T. Murray via AGI
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 10:24 PM, MP via AGI wrote:
> What’s going to be done to fix this issue?
>
The issue (of generating "THINK" from normal activation rather than from
SpreadAct() activation) has been fixed by the indicated "bugfix" to the
SpreadAct() module, namely by restoring the missing
What’s going to be done to fix this issue?
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:21 AM, A.T. Murray via AGI
wrote:
> We have a problem where the AI Mind is calling Indicative() two times in a
> row for no good reason. After a what-think query, the AI is supposed to call
>
We have a problem where the AI Mind is calling Indicative() two times in a
row for no good reason. After a what-think query, the AI is supposed to
call Indicative() a first time, then ConJoin(), and then Indicative()
again. We could make the governance depend upon either the 840=THINK verb
or upon
