BUS: For quorum reasons

I vote PRESENT on every proposal I can, unless someone persuades me that that's a bad idea. -- ais523

BUS: I /hope/ this doesn't work, but just in case...

I submit the following proposal, which is also a promise (title = Proposals and Promises are both text-bearing entities, coauthor = Murphy, AI = 1): {{{ I transfer 250 points to ais523. }}} Then I cash the above proposal, then (if it still exists) I retract it. CFJ: ais523 has more than 50 points

BUS: The CFJ queue is getting large

I sit. -- ais523

BUS: Happy birthday, Agora!

I award myself a Magenta Ribbon. -- ais523

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3037 assigned to Walker

--- On Tue, 21/6/11, Pavitra wrote: > Back on the first hand, I could have refrained from disclosing the > content of the document in question, and while it probably would have > been possible to discover this (the document does not remotely meet the > usual cryptographic standards of unguessabili

BUS: Sorry, I've been busy recently

I recuse myself from CFJ 3022, become supine, and become inactive. -- ais523

BUS: More promising gameplay

I create the following promise, and transfer it to the Tree: Text: "I register." Conditions: The player who cashes the promise must have registered earlier in the same message in which they cashed the promise. -- ais523

BUS: Reducing ambiguity

It seems unlikely that CFJ 2003b exists. But in case it does, I attempt to opine REMAND on it (not on the merits of the case, but because it leaves the resulting gamestate easiest to disambiugate). -- ais523

BUS: Judgements

CFJ 3006: The conditions for invalidity on an NoV are quite narrow. Even if the act identified is ambiguous, that might be options for finding the accused NOT GUILTY, but not for invalidity. (I think "NoV: ais523 violated the power-3 rule 101 by nkep" could be a valid NoV, although not a particular

BUS: Why doesn't this have an unambiguity clause?

I create a Promise: "I call for judgement on the statement 'This CFJ is a CFJ.'", with the following condition for caching: this condition is false. I call for judgement on the statement "I can cash a promise made in the same message in which this CFJ was called." -- ais523

BUS: Getting this started

I create a Promise: "I become inactive". I unofficially offer to trade this Promise for a similar one owned by someone else. -- ais523

BUS: Judgements

I judge CFJ 2996 TRUE. A condition on destruction is still a condition. (Oops...) On the subject of CFJ 3003: First, obviously "publish" = "announce" because rule 478 says so. So saying that somebody publishes something, is the same as saying that they announce it. However, doing something "by an

BUS: Something I meant to ask a few days ago

CFJ: Yally is a player. Arguments: Recently Yally embarked upon a campaign of systematic rules-breaking, pointing out that all the punishments listed in the ruleset for rules-breaking could be avoided via more rules-breaking. However, generally speaking, someone who refuses to abide by the rules o

BUS: Seems like I am a player after all

I sit up. I set my judicial rank, if it still exists, to 3. -- ais523

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2980 judged FALSE by omd; Wooble, omd, G. request reconsideration; still assigned to omd

--- On Wed, 23/3/11, omd wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > ==  CFJ 2980 == > > > >    ais523 is a player. > > > > > > TRUE. I intend to

BUS: No such file or directory

I deregister. (This is a bit of a rant, but not a Cantus Cygneus; I'll be back later, I expect.) The current requirement to read the Vladivostok Telephone Directory in the first week that falls within February is a ridiculous one, and one that makes me not want to play a game. If a game has rules

BUS: Re: OFF: Proposal 6959 Results

--- On Mon, 31/1/11, Kerim Aydin wrote: > This notice resolves the Agoran decision of whether to > adopt proposal 6959 (Fugue in G.) I become active. I nominate Murphy for Assessor. I set my judicial rank to 0 (I'm a little busy in RL at the moment, and would prefer only simple cases for the t

BUS: An opinion

I opine REMAND without prejudice on CFJ 2929a. Given the arguments on the CFJ, the judge should ideally go into more detail as to what their affect is, or if they're irrelevant (and if so, why). -- ais523

BUS: An ergent question

CFJ, II 1: A player with exactly 2 ergs remaining CAN destroy 1 erg in eir own possession via a fee-based action. CFJ, II 1: It is legal for a player with exactly 2 ergs remaining to attempt to destroy 1 erg in eir own possession via a fee-based action. CFJ, II 1: If a player with exactly 2 ergs re

BUS: Judgements

I judge CFJ 2942 TRUE, accepting the caller's arguments. I increase the II of CFJ 2946 to 1 and judge it FALSE. Regardless of whether you can specify PRESENT to be a valid option like that or not, the purported resolution was incorrect; for if both PRESENT and ADOPTED were valid options, the decis

BUS: Offices seem meaningless at the moment...

I assume Herald. -- ais523

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2921

I judge CFJ 2921 FALSE. The rule implies that making a claim, in the context of the rule in question, is something that has to be done deliberately (by making it illegal to do so falsely); and I wasn't intending to do so. (In fact, I vaguely remembered the rule in question existed, looked for it in

BUS: Bestowing favours

I Bestow Favours as follows: Kitchen Staff Supervisor: Murphy Chief Justice: Yally Grand Vizier: G. Head Gardener: scshunt Crown Prince: Sgeo Puisne Justice: Roujo -- ais523

BUS: Recusal

I recuse myself from CFJ 2901, as I just realised I have a conflict of interest with respect to it. (The CoI in question is probably not visible yet...) -- ais523

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2909

CFJ 2909 is rather complicated (and until recently, had no evidence attached...); there are several factors that affect the decision, so I'll take them in turn. (Thanks for omd for helping me discuss this in ##nomic; I would transfer a prop from Wooble to omd for lack of evidence vs. useful discuss

BUS: A messy business

I call for judgement on the statement «It would be illegal for me to publish a public message consisting only of the following text: "I publish the following Notice of Violation: ais523 violated/is currently violating the power-2 rule 2230, committing the Class-4 Crime of Libel, by publishing this

Re: BUS: Registration

tion for players who weren't around in 2009: pikhq = Josiah Worcester, myndzi is someone else, neither are current players.) The formation of (2009-06-15 pikhq): On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 12:33 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 23:36 -0500, Josiah Worcester wrote: > > 23:3

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2888

I set the II of CFJ 2888 to 1. I judge CFJ 2888 FALSE. The trick here is to notice that self-ratifying that it's possible to move as many times as possible is a no-op, and thus is irrelevant to the case. In the absence of any useful self-ratification of the statement, I agree with the caller that,

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2892

I judge CFJ 2892 TRUE. Believing the statement in question is obviously completely unreasonable, as it would cause a paradox. Thus, making it would be illegal, and therefore the statement is true. -- ais523

BUS: Judgements

I increase the II of CFJ 2883 to 1. I judge CFJ 2883 TRUE. "i.e." means "that is", i.e. it's creating a definition here, and even if it seems to contradict the commonsense meaning of "substantially identical", definitions in the Rules take precedence. (Additionally, even if it's considered a straig

BUS: Judgement

I judge CFJ 2877 TRUE; it should be judged the same way as CFJ 2875, and the appeal on that probably won't be processed before the time to judge this case runs out. I stand up. -- ais523

BUS: Picking on the Pariah

I intend, with notice, to transfer an erg to Warrigal, the Herald. I pay a fee to submit the following NoV: Warrigal violated committed the Class-2 Crime of Restricted Behavior by violating rule 2125, because rule 1006 states that an officer may be referred to by the name of that office, and Warri

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2875

(CFJ 2785: Ienpw III is a player.) The message in question, given that it doesn't take ridiculous amounts of effort to decode (with Latin being fairly well-known in the Agoran community, as far as I know), is clearly identifiable as an attempt to test whether a particular message will cause a regi

BUS: Oops?

I CFJ on the statement "At some time in the past, Keba was the Speaker", barring Wooble. Arguments: Rule 2315 only allows initialisation the List of Succession "as soon as possible after this proposal takes effect"; unfortunately, rule 2315 is not a proposal, so this never happened. Thus, as far a

BUS: End-of-week actions

I spend ergs to create 2 capacitors. I intend, without 2 objections from members of Team 4, to rename Team 4 to Revolutionary. -- ais523

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2866

I judge CFJ 2866 NOT GUILTY. As omd says, the interpretation suggested by the caller is absurd; for a criminal case, it's not necessary to judge whether it's actually correct or not, but merely if it's reasonable to assume that the interpretation is correct (because then the player can perform the

BUS: Hey, I can do /this/ with ergs

I pay a fee to initiate an election for Pariah. -- ais523

BUS: Incapacitated?

Three times, I pay a fee to create a capacitor. -- ais523

BUS: Opinion, CFJ 2857a

I opine REMAND WITH PREJUDICE on the first appeal in CFJ 2857. (I believe REMIT WITH PREJUDICE is also appropriate here, but the REMAND option more closely follows SHOULD requirements.) The judicial declaration was clearly an attempt to abuse the justice system, and thus the judge "generally inapp

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2862

I judge CFJ 2862 NOT GUILTY. The rule requires a reasonable belief that the statement is true; but it seems that coppro did indeed believe the statement to be true, and I consider it generally reasonable to believe Wooble to be the IADoP, seeing as e so often is. I am currently not quite sure wheth

BUS: Election time

I intend to deputise for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new Pariah. -- ais523

BUS: Numerical cleaning

I intend, without objection, to clean rule 1023 by changing the second (5) in section (b) to (6). -- ais523

BUS: Distributability

I pay a fee to make Distributed Proposal 6830 distributable. -- ais523

BUS: The effects of inactivity

I postulate the Referee. -- ais523

BUS: Refereeism

NoV: ais523 committed the Class-1 Crime of Tardiness by breaking rule 2143 by failing to publish a Referee's Report last week. I contest this NoV and initiate a criminal CFJ, asking for a zero penalty due to extenuating circumstances. I was relying on the then-PSMs statement that e would have a PS

BUS: List slip

I become inactive. -- ais523

BUS: Pariah Rising

I nominate Warrigal as Pariah. -- ais523

BUS: More fun with nomenclature

I submit the following proposal, "Distributed Proposal 6830", AI 2, II 1: {{{ Amend rule 2255 to change the Influence Levels of each of the following Positions, in order, to the given values: Kitchen Staff Supervisor: 8 Justiciar: 5 Grand Vizier: 3 Head Gardner: 3 Crown Prince: 1 [Reduce the disp

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2835

I set CFJ 2835's II to 1, then judge it FALSE. The rule is unambiguous (although quite possibly broken), and the caller's arguments are correct. -- ais523

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] League Table

--- On Sun, 22/8/10, Alex Smith wrote: > Just in case anyone notices that /all/ the headers on the > above are forged, I hereby confirm that it was in fact me > that sent that. That is, all the headers in the original email. A lot more were added in transit, as always. -- ais523

BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] League Table

--- On Sun, 22/8/10, ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: > From: ais...@bham.ac.uk > Subject: OFF: [Referee] League Table > To: agora-offic...@agoranomic.org > Date: Sunday, 22 August, 2010, 18:14 > [This is a resend: the original was > held for moderation because I > accidentally forgot the To: address] J

BUS: Capacity

Not having access to my email archives (and the agoranomic.org archives being a pain to search), I have no idea how many ergs I have left. I tend not to spend much, though, so I probably have almost the entire 11 I did at the start of the week. Thus, I do the following: If I have at least 3 erg

Re: BUS: Hoisting one's own wormhole

--- On Thu, 19/8/10, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > I also publish a NoV, pertaining that ais523 committed to > class-1 > crime of Hoisting Eir Own Petard by pushing the Heave Laser > Cannon > button harder, causing the Shuttle to have the same > position as a > wormhole. The rule in question is 2300.

BUS: Website submission

I submit the attached HTML document as a Website Submission. This one is rather less conservative than Murphy's. (Note to Murphy: your submission contains an effectively broken link, as Freenode no longer allow access via Mibbit. This submission contains an alternative webchat client.) -- ais523

BUS: The Pariah

(I'm not sure how many ergs I have atm; leaving this undistributable anyway, for further comment.) I submit the following proposal (Title = The Pariah, AI = 1.7, II = 1): Create a new power-1.7 rule with the following text: {{{ The Pariah is an elected office, with no reports. Whenever a play

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2826

I set the II of CFJ 2826 to 1, then judge it TRUE. The rules do not require any specific standard of explicitness involved in becoming an officer after a designation; and it's pretty clear from context that Tiger's announcement was meant to make emself an officer, much the same as replying FOR in r

BUS: Timing and ISIDTID

I call for judgement on the statement "It is POSSIBLE for the CotC to assign a judge to a CFJ, other than this one, which has exactly this statement". Then if I have not already done so, I publish a copy of the text of this email. Arguments: The question is as to whether I can publish a message wh

BUS: Thesis, compressed

On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 17:00 -0500, agora-business-ad...@agoranomic.org wrote: > Your mail to 'agora-business' with the subject > > BUS: A History of Agoran Wins, 2009-Present > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Mess

BUS: At ehird's suggestion

I submit the following proposal (AI 2, II 1, coauthor=ehird, title="To make chambers interesting", not yet distributable): Create a new power-2 rule "VLOD Bootstrapping": {{{ A player's voting limit on an unresolved Ordinary decision that existed before this rule was created is equal to the va

Fwd: BUS: Teams assignment, part 1

rs to City than United, there'll be a followup to rebalance the teams to gain the actual team assignment. -- ais523 Referee --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dice rolls requested by: Alex Smith Rolls sent to: ais...@bham.ac.uk emurph...@social.

BUS: Judgements

I judge CFJ 2810 FALSE. I don't see anything wrong with the caller's reasoning. I opine REMAND on CFJ 2809a; everyone, including the original judge, seems to want more detail in the judgement. -- ais523

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6749-6750

On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 07:27 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE > 6749 P 2 2.0 ais523 Teams > 6750 R 0 2.0 Wooble No Caps for Late Judges I vote FOR both. -- ais523

BUS: Teams proposal

I submit the following proposal, "Teams" (AI 2, II 2, /not/ made immediately Distributable in the hope that people will send feedback): Create a new power-1 rule, "Teams": {{{ A Team is a sort of entity defined by the rules; creation and destruction of Teams is secured. Each Teams have a name,

BUS: More weirdness in the rules

I call for judgement on the statement "Rule 101 is greater than rule 2029". Evidence: Excerpt from Rule 2141: "Rules have ID numbers, to be assigned by the Rulekeepor, and are strictly ordered." Arguments: The power-3 rule 2141, by insisting that rules are strictly ordered, implies that it's poss

BUS: Read the Judicial Record week CFJs, part 1 (there may or may not be a part 2)

I call for judgement on the statement "/dev/null (formerly an Agoran contract) is an entity". Evidence: /dev/null was a contract with no parties, and the following text: > This contract is a pledge, titled "/dev/null". The player known as > root CAN join this contract by announcement; no other pe

BUS: Voting

On open decisions to adopt proposals, I vote ENDORSE COMEX unless the proposal was authored by comex or coppro, in which case I vote ENDORSE MURPHY. -- ais523

BUS: Echoing the past

I submit the following proposal, "Proposal #6: Is There A Russian In The House?": {{{ In order for a proposal to pass, it must contain page 106 of the 1961\ Vladivostok telephone directory. This rule takes precedence over all other rules. In the case that 1107 passes, this proposal is an Emergen

BUS: Computer problems

I'm having computer issues at the moment. As a precaution, I recuse myself from every CFJ I'm currently assigned to, then become supine. -- ais523

BUS: [Enigma] This week's puzzle

Yes, even if you'd forgotten it existed, Enigma is still here; this week's puzzle is "An elementary puzzle" by coppro: {{ The following is an elementary puzzle. What's it saying? 39-8-92 74-53-7 }} Summary for new players who don't know about Enigma, and other people who need a refresher: Enigma

BUS: Judgements

I judge CFJ 2750 UNDETERMINED. The way I parse the statement of the CFJ, the conditional is only satisfied if the L&FD (the Chief Whip at the time the CFJ was submitted) makes an announcement. Several rather radical rule changes would be needed before that would be possible, and it's impossible to

BUS: Whoops, missed a deadline

I recuse myself from CFJ 2733. If this platonically flipped me to supine, I become sitting. I NoV against myself for failing to judge a CFJ on time, violating rule 2158 with power 2. Then I close it by announcement, and play two Absolv-O-Matics to remove 2 Rests from myself. -- ais523

BUS: Definitions

I zoop a CFJ on the statement "This is a CFJ." Arguments: zooping isn't really defined in this context, but most Agorans have a basic idea of what it's meant to mean. Given that I could just create a CFJ by announcement, what happens here? -- ais523

BUS: Harvesting

I harvest the following CFJ numbers for 2 WRV each: 2719, 2724, 2727. For anyone who's short a few WRV and can't easily get them: I'm willing to harvest CFJ numbers for people if given crops forming a CFJ number I can harvest (but have not yet harvested), a reasonable amount of time in which to ha

Re: BUS: The Make Someone Happy Contest

--- On Wed, 21/10/09, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I object to all intents to flip the contestmaster of Happy > Times. So do I. -- ais523

BUS: Re: BAK: What's it Tue Ya?

--- On Tue, 20/10/09, Sean Hunt wrote: > I intend, without objection, to transfer a Medal from the > LFD to myself. Assuming you can somehow manage this, I object. (Also, stop sending to backup.) -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2696 assigned to coppro

--- On Tue, 20/10/09, Ed Murphy wrote: > From: Ed Murphy > Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2696 assigned to coppro > To: agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org > Date: Tuesday, 20 October, 2009, 5:08 PM > ais523 wrote: > > > And with 2 support, I do so. > > NttPF > > TTttPF; with 2 s

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2720

I judge CFJ 2720 FALSE. The caller appears to be correct; the wrong thing was secured, thus making the destruction in question possible. As a result, I determine that the possessor of the instance of the card class in question can't be determined with reasonable effort (because there isn't one).

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2696 assigned to coppro

--- On Tue, 20/10/09, Sean Hunt wrote: > From: Sean Hunt > Subject: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2696 assigned to coppro > To: "Agora Business" > Date: Tuesday, 20 October, 2009, 12:12 AM > Sean Hunt wrote: > > Ed Murphy wrote: > >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2696 > >>

BUS: Re: [s-b] non-player CFJ

On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 22:57 +, 0x44 wrote: > I become standing. I deputize for Oracle to assign this CFJ to Judge 0x44. > I answer this CFJ true. > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:28:10 -0400, Geoffrey Spear > wrote: > > I CFJ on: "A state of war exists between Agora and B." > > > > Arguments: the

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2706

I set the II of CFJ 2706 to 1. In CFJ 2706, ehird appears to be the only person seriously arguing for FALSE, so I will address eir argument for falsity. It contains a logical fallacy; despite the fact that a non-player person /can/ continue to play, they can also choose not to play. ehird's argume

BUS: Epimenides is boring, what about Gödel?

I call for judgement on the statement "At no point in time between the moment this CFJ is assigned to a judge, and the next moment at which either rule 2215 is repealed, amended, or otherwise fails to be enforceable with its current meaning, will it be legal for the judge of this CFJ to publically

BUS: Card cleanout

I play Discard Picking to gain Presto! I play Presto! on comex's Discard Picking. I play Discard Picking to gain Presto! I play Presto! on coppro's Discard Picking. I play Discard Picking to gain Presto! I play Presto! on Darth Cliche's Discard Picking. I play Discard Picking to gain Presto! I play

BUS: Deputisation

I intend to deputise for the dealer of each basic deck to audit the appropriate entities. -- ais523

BUS: A temporary loan

I transfer 11 WRV to coppro. -- ais523

BUS: Chicken Coup Time Limits

I submit the following proposal (AI=1, II=1, Title="Open-ended duties are bad"): Replace {{{ When a chicken coup is begun, the Admiral of the Navy SHALL, if possible, perform the next action e is explicitly and publicly instructed to perform by another player. Failure to do s

BUS: Enigma

FWIW, there are no Enigma submissions this week either. There haven't been for ages, in fact. So long that it isn't even worth talking about doing duties in a timely manner as no points were awarded anyway. I would insert a motivational speech at this point, except that I'm dubious as to whether i

BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2703

I judge CFJ 2703 UNDETERMINED. The statement is too vague due to ambiguity to have an obvious single meaning, and UNDETERMINED is appropriate when a statement is too vague to deduce what its truth value is. -- ais523

Re: BUS: Intent to ditch the Points Party

--- On Wed, 23/9/09, Elliott Hird wrote: > Proposal: No (AI=1.7,II=0) > { > Create N Rests in ais523's possession, where N is 24 > subtracted by the > number of Rests in ais523's possession. > } I submit the following proposal: "No to No" (AI 1.7, II 1): { For each Rest in ais523's possession, de

BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2680 judged FALSE by ə

--- On Tue, 22/9/09, Ed Murphy wrote: > ==  CFJ 2680 == > Judgement:              > FALSE I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. At the time, the status of CFJ 2670a was rather unclear; and I don't think a belief that that appe

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Darth Cliche reregisters

--- On Tue, 22/9/09, Kerim Aydin wrote: > From: Kerim Aydin > Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Darth Cliche reregisters > To: "Agora Discussion" > Date: Tuesday, 22 September, 2009, 10:20 PM > > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Kenner Gordon wrote: > > I register. > > I... er... my goodness.  I don't think I can CF

BUS: (no subject)

Testing. (I want to ensure this comes out in plain text.) I pledge that I am ais523. Both of my email addresses ais...@bham.ac.uk and ais...@normish.org seem to fail for sending at the moment, which is why I'm sending from a third address. -- ais523

Re: BUS: Intent test

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:33 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > I intend, without objection, to deputise for the Grand Poobah to do the > caste rotation for July. > > I call for judgement on the statement "If the Grand Poobah does not do a > caste rotation within the first week of Jul

BUS: Intent test

I intend, without objection, to deputise for the Grand Poobah to do the caste rotation for July. I call for judgement on the statement "If the Grand Poobah does not do a caste rotation within the first week of July, and I do make any further intents to deputise until I attempt to deputise, I CAN d

BUS: Appeals opinion

I opine AFFIRM on CFJ 2586a. The original judgement was appropriate; it's likely best to call a new CFJ, with the arguments and evidence more definitely attached to it, in order to resolve the issues. -- ais523

Re: BUS: CFJs (attn Tanner Swett, ais523, Wooble)

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 12:53 -0400, comex wrote: > I call an inquiry case on each of the following statements, submitting > it to the Justiciar and setting an Interest Index of 3: > * ais523 is party to at least one private contract containing the word > "inferences". > * Wooble is party to at least

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6387-6394

On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 10:19 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > This distribution of proposals 6387-6394 initiates the Agoran > Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible voters for ordinary > proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic > proposals are the active first-cl

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 6386

On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 16:11 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE I vote as follows: > 6386 O 2 1.0 C-walkerThe Greetor FOR * my ordinary voting limit. -- ais523

Re: BUS: A rather flat Happy Birthday

On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 05:10 -0700, Taral wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > > to satisfy the Winning Condition of Musicianship, and I win by > > Musicianship. > Congrats. :) > > Happy birthday Agora, by the way! > Happy birthday Agora! I cr

BUS: A rather flat Happy Birthday

On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:40 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > C#D# F#G#A# > Player C D E F G A B Total > DbEb GbAbBb > -

Re: BUS: [Cookie Jar] Report

On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 08:52 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:54, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:50 AM, > > C-walker wrote: > >> I guess 16 proposals and 9 CFJs for that week. > > I guess 8 proposals and 12 CFJs. > I guess 10 proposals and 14 CFJs. For the

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >