On 6/29/20 9:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>
> On 6/29/2020 10:22 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> I intend, Without 3 Objections, to enact the following — modified from
>> previous Birthday regulations and a variety of rulesets for Diplomacy,
>> primarily those of EPCC
There were actually 9 parties rather than 7, so everybody who tried to cash
doubloons actually could only get 55 of them (I think people did this in a
way where they did get 55 instead of the whole thing failing).
--
>From R. Lee
On 6/29/20 7:59 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
> On 6/29/20 7:58 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 23:38, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
>> agora-business wrote:
>>> On 6/29/20 7:36 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
I
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 17:49, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/29/20 1:47 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 17:41, Becca Lee via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >> Nice, I transfer 2 Pendants to QuickExchange
> >
> > Er... I think
On 6/29/20 3:58 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> Happy Birthday Agora! I award myself Magenta Glitter and then a Magenta
> Ribbon.
>
You already have the Ribbon, but even if you didn't the second would
have failed.
--
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pir
[I wrote the below, but am purposefully sending it to Discussion for
commentary rather than pointing atm]
On 6/29/2020 11:08 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>
> I find Aris guily of Tardiness as Promotor and levy the Cold Hand of
> Justice, imposing a forgivable fine of 1 blot, speci
I don't plan to spend the doubloon, which will be destroyed after the
parley is adopted anyway.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:16 AM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 2020-06-29 12:00, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> > So I transfer 1 Doubloon to
On 2020-06-29 12:00, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
So I transfer 1 Doubloon to me mate, R. Lee, and as e has accepted me
silver now, it is a bond and position not to be betrayed.
This fails if the number of doubloons possessed by each person is
greater than 71.
--
Trigon
I LOVE SPAG
On 2020-06-29 11:57, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
For each doubloon I currently possess (I think: 71), I transfer it to
the Plunder Partnership, causing the Plunder Partnership to transfer one
coin to me.
I think this fails due to the following text:
A Pirate with
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:04 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> Aye, for it be to my benefit, I do hereby transfer 1 coin from The Plunder
> Partnership to myself. Aye, and being as I am a pirate who likes me
> riches, I do that 70 more times in successi
On 6/29/2020 10:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>
> If I no longer possess any doubloons, I consent to the above Parley.
>
well *that* defeats the purpose somewhat...
lol, I think you need to retry now that I pf'd.
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 17:49, Becca Lee via agora-business
wrote:
>
> Oops, I consent, take the pendants, and transfer them back to QE in
> exchange for 84 credits
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 3:48 AM James Cook via agora-discussion <
> agora-dis
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 17:47, James Cook wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 17:41, Becca Lee via agora-business
> wrote:
> > Nice, I transfer 2 Pendants to QuickExchange
>
> Er... I think you just gave 2 Pendants to QE for free.
I think you need to say you pay 1 Pendant in order to be granted 44
Le
On 6/29/20 1:47 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 17:41, Becca Lee via agora-business
> wrote:
>> Nice, I transfer 2 Pendants to QuickExchange
>
> Er... I think you just gave 2 Pendants to QE for free.
>
> I consent to the following amendment to the Dragon Quick
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 17:41, Becca Lee via agora-business
wrote:
> Nice, I transfer 2 Pendants to QuickExchange
Er... I think you just gave 2 Pendants to QE for free.
I consent to the following amendment to the Dragon QuickExchange contract:
{
Append one paragraph at the end. It says: { If R.
On 6/29/20 1:18 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 6/29/2020 10:13 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/29/20 12:11 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> For the Participation Award, given to the people who are members to the
>>> most contracts:
>> I would restrict this
On 6/29/2020 10:13 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/29/20 12:11 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>> For the Participation Award, given to the people who are members to the
>> most contracts:
> I would restrict this to people who are members of contracts with at
> least two member
The creator of the dragon corporation is warrigal
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 3:13 AM nch via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/29/20 12:11 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> > For the Participation Award, given to the people who are members to the
> > most contr
On 6/29/20 12:11 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> For the Participation Award, given to the people who are members to the
> most contracts:
I would restrict this to people who are members of contracts with at
least two members. Otherwise, I like the idea!
This is an idea I've been thinking of for a little while now. I think it
would be interesting to acknowledge people's effort with contracts. For
now, this is just an informal thing sent to a-d, but maybe I'll make it
a publicly-funded contract in the future if there's any interest.
As this is not
On 6/29/20 11:37 AM, ATMunn via agora-official wrote:
> "Co Dependents" nch, R. Lee
The text you have for this contract is wrong. It excludes the original
text of the contract [0]. We appended two lines [1] and then removed one
of those two [2].
[0] h
On 6/29/2020 9:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Oh nice, quick turnaround!
>
> I assign CFJ 3857 to R. Lee.
>
Note: to be clear to everyone I just followed straight-up favoring policy
here no bribes were solicited from my end or accepted :).
-G.
you have this right in the text but not in the initial summary
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:45 AM Ed Strange via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> (unofficial) CoE: the "new contract" between nch and I doesnt exist as we
> both agreed to repeal it.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at
Were i still notary, I would hold it automatically destroyed (and did so
for many other such pledges). nonetheless, notary reports aren't
self-ratifying, so i suppose it's good to keep an eye on it.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:33 AM ATMunn via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrot
It's just a matter of whether the pledge is automatically destroyed or
needs to be manually destroyed.
On 6/29/2020 12:30 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/29/20 12:29 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
Rule 2450:
The time window of a
Yes, it is very explicitly stating otherwise. Anyway, even if it were not,
it would not have any effect beyond the 24 hours.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:29 AM ATMunn via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Rule 2450:
>The time window of a pledge is 60 da
On 6/29/20 12:29 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> Rule 2450:
> The time window of a pledge is 60 days, unless the
> pledge explicitly states otherwise.
>
> Is "for the next 24 hours" sufficient to be "explicitly stating
> otherwise" regarding the time window?
I thi
Rule 2450:
The time window of a pledge is 60 days, unless the
pledge explicitly states otherwise.
Is "for the next 24 hours" sufficient to be "explicitly stating
otherwise" regarding the time window?
On 6/29/2020 12:21 PM, grok via agora-business wrote:
For the next 24
please, film yourself doing a silly dance (if you prefer for privacy
reasons, record your voice singing a silly song, or do something textually
silly, if you must)
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:21 AM grok via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> For the next 24 hours, I pledge to
I think the reason was that we'd then have to comb through the entire
backlog as long service awards hadnt been awarded for a (very) long time.
But as this is relatively recent, an exceptionally long and difficult
period, and a current player, I wouldn't mind making an exception.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:20 PM Ed Strange via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I point a finger at Aris for Promotor Tardiness
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 9:01 AM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > The Promotor's report is
I agree! If Agora doesn't want me around, it is welcome to deregister me by
proposal, which should be the only way to deregister someone without their
consent.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:40 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/29/2020 8:05 AM, Ed S
Yeah, I mean we all CoE things that don't turn out to be errors, on all
the reports. But when a particular type of report is causing persistent
errors you need to look at your UI to see if it's a little too confusing.
:) I've noticed a lot of comments/questions on proposal status, maybe
it's co
On 6/29/20 11:37 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 6/29/2020 8:05 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:50 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, I think the issue is that letting a person deregistered for crimes
>>> back in the game sooner than a v
On 6/29/2020 8:05 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:50 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I think the issue is that letting a person deregistered for crimes
>> back in the game sooner than a voluntary deregistrant is silly. Crime
>> deregistration should be a
Certainly not Green, Orange is a big possibility if there is an assessment
within the next few days, it's true.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:14 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/29/20 11:11 AM, Ed Strange via agora-business wrote:
> > I have an Emerald, Gray, and
On 6/29/20 11:11 AM, Ed Strange via agora-business wrote:
> I have an Emerald, Gray, and Magenta ribbon (or glitter) within the last 2
> days, I also can easily get Cyan (by resigning from my own office then
> deputising for it). Can I interest you in bribing you to assigning me a CFJ
> in the next
Oh this is my fault, I thought I'd pended that proposal before the
beginning of the GMT week but that was not so.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:05 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/29/2020 6:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> On 6/29/2020 2:09 AM, Ed Stra
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:50 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I think the issue is that letting a person deregistered for crimes
> back in the game sooner than a voluntary deregistrant is silly. Crime
> deregistration should be a time out, I
On 6/29/2020 6:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> On 6/29/2020 2:09 AM, Ed Strange
via agora-discussion wrote:>> the pool also contains my most recent
proposal, the one about repealing>> summary judgement> > Aris,> > You just
asked why we should change the rule to actually state that> proposal pool
repor
On 6/29/2020 2:09 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> the pool also contains my most recent proposal, the one about repealing
> summary judgement
Aris,
You just asked why we should change the rule to actually state that
proposal pool report is accurate to the beginning of the week inst
On 6/29/2020 6:23 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> Why don't we just have "A player cannot receive a welcome package if eir
> most recent deregistration was as a Fugitive". It means you aren't forever
> barred, but you have to wait the 30 days like everyone else.
Yeah, I think the is
On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 01:30, Ed Strange via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Im not sure this contract itself can technically override No Faking,
> however it should be clear from context as the game goes on that nobody
> intends their statenents to be true.
If it's still a worry, we could require all
Why don't we just have "A player cannot receive a welcome package if eir
most recent deregistration was as a Fugitive". It means you aren't forever
barred, but you have to wait the 30 days like everyone else.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:42 PM nch via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.o
On 6/29/20 1:46 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Okay, I'm tired, and this is the best I can think of right now. This
> would allow exiled players to be repeatedly exiled until they get down
> to 9 blots, but give them welcome packages back afterward. Why 9? A
> player with fewer tha
On 6/28/20 9:43 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't get around to reading these until now. Thanks for
> going to the effort to write these! Comments inline.
>
>> 4. The judge is the final arbitor on matters of this tournament, and eir
>> decisions can overturned if and onl
the pool also contains my most recent proposal, the one about repealing
summary judgement
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 6:02 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Here's that draft I promised. Time for bed.
>
> -Aris
> ---
> I hereby distribute each listed pr
Here's that draft I promised. Time for bed.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 8, the voting method is AI-majority, and the
valid options are
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 8:52 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> Amend Rule 1607 (Distribution) by replacing:
> The Promotor's report includes a list of all proposals in the
> Proposal Pool
> with:
> The Promotor's report includes a list of all proposals that were
>
49 matches
Mail list logo
