On 4/22/24 01:56, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 22/04/2024 06:41, mqyhlkahu via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We received the following response to Our Registration[1]:
>>> Hello! I cause the above-registering person to receive a welcome package.
>> We would like
On 22/04/2024 06:41, mqyhlkahu via agora-discussion wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We received the following response to Our Registration[1]:
>> Hello! I cause the above-registering person to receive a welcome package.
> We would like to ask what a 'welcome package' is.
>
> Thank you.
A welcome package is
On 4/22/24 01:41, mqyhlkahu via agora-discussion wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We received the following response to Our Registration[1]:
>> Hello! I cause the above-registering person to receive a welcome package.
> We would like to ask what a 'welcome package' is.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>[1]
> https://ma
On 22/04/2024 06:49, mqyhlkahu via agora-discussion wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We would like to ask about the posted objection[2] to our test e-mail[1].
> Specifically, we would like to ask upon what grounds the test was objected to,
> and whether we have performed some misdeed which must be rectified.
>
Hello,
We would like to ask about the posted objection[2] to our test e-mail[1].
Specifically, we would like to ask upon what grounds the test was objected to,
and whether we have performed some misdeed which must be rectified.
Thank you.
[1]
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
Hello,
We received the following response to Our Registration[1]:
> Hello! I cause the above-registering person to receive a welcome package.
We would like to ask what a 'welcome package' is.
Thank you.
[1]
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2024-April/05
Hello,
> Under what name do you wish to be known?
Any names listed in set [1] are acceptable. Please note that the listed names
are _not_ case-insensitive — they are all fully lower-cased, even when they
appear in contexts which would typically require upper-casing or title-casing,
such as at th
Hello,
This message is a test to ensure that Our e-mail is configured correctly.
Should You receive it, please ignore it.
Thank You.
After all, you can cut the flowers, but the weather is everywhere.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:08 PM Jaff via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I will point out that there are multiple ways to take actions of an office
> without holding it which this wouldn't cover, such as delegation. I think a
> safer fix would be preventing a player wh
On 4/21/24 22:43, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Spending Stone: As the Stonemason, I don't want to incentivize massive
>> numbers of wieldings in the same message because that increases my
>> workload.
>>
> This one doesn't make sense, the stones would probably be wielded anyways,
> a
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:10 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/21/24 18:04, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> >>> 9099~ sna
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 7:41 PM Matt Smyth via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> And at what point in the rules does it say when you are able to close
> registration for the raffle? The emails seem to show that you started,
> registered, then closed the raffle within abo
On 4/21/24 20:11, Matt Smyth via agora-discussion wrote:
> I edit the proposal as such:
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 9:41 am Matt Smyth via agora-business, <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> {{{
>> Title: An Overpowering Proposal
>> Adoption Index: 1.0
On 4/21/24 18:04, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>> 9099~ snail 2.0 Quantum Superstone
>> AGAINST
>>
>>
>>> 9100~ snail 2.0 Spending Sto
I will point out that there are multiple ways to take actions of an office
without holding it which this wouldn't cover, such as delegation. I think a
safer fix would be preventing a player who holds an office from taking
actions corresponding to another office such that holding both would make
the
And at what point in the rules does it say when you are able to close
registration for the raffle? The emails seem to show that you started,
registered, then closed the raffle within about ten minutes. Surely there's
something to prevent this from happening?
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 10:37 am secretsna
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 7:06 PM Matt Smyth via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 10:04 am secretsnail9 via agora-business, <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I temporarily deputize as Collector to publish the following Raffle
> Result.
>
I edit the proposal as such:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 9:41 am Matt Smyth via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{{
> Title: An Overpowering Proposal
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: juniper
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2472 (Office Incompa
I'll modify the proposal
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 10:05 am Matt Smyth, wrote:
> My idea was quorum-minus-one times default voting, so that it takes e.g.
> if there were eleven voters then dictator would count as 5 votes (or voting
> strength, etc.) if one person has one vote. This means it requires
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 10:04 am secretsnail9 via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I temporarily deputize as Collector to publish the following Raffle Result.
>
> Raffle Participants:
> snail
>
> Raffle Winner:
> snail
> --
> snail
>
So you collected your own stamp?
___
Junip
My idea was quorum-minus-one times default voting, so that it takes e.g. if
there were eleven voters then dictator would count as 5 votes (or voting
strength, etc.) if one person has one vote. This means it requires the
Dictator and one player to vote the same way for a proposal to pass.
On Mon, 2
I object to any attempts to declare apathy
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
secretsnail9 via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 7:56:24 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Cc: secretsnail9
Subject: BUS: (@collector) raffle time
I enter the r
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 6:41 PM Matt Smyth via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{{
> Title: An Overpowering Proposal
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: juniper
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2472 (Office Incompatibilities) by appending
>
>
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > 9099~ snail 2.0 Quantum Superstone
>
> AGAINST
>
>
> > 9100~ snail 2.0 Spending Stone
>
> AGAINST
>
>
> > 9101~ snail 2.0 Unst
Janet wrote:
When a document is to be ratified, the publication time is the instant
at which the document to be ratified was published. The truth time of
the document is the instant at which the document specifies that it was
true, if any, or the publication time otherwise. Ratification of a
doc
25 matches
Mail list logo
