Re: DIS: Re: Wards

What do you have against the Reportor? On 10/30/2017 10:53 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > How does Agora have no money? There were 32 proposals last week > > We really need to decrease reward amounts. Have hard jobs: Rulekeepor, > Treasuror be 5, all the way down to like reportor as 1. > > On Tue, Oct 3

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Make Deregistration Less Stupid

You should make it without objection or with 2 Agoran Consent. On 10/30/2017 10:29 PM, Telnaior wrote: > I won't be looking to use this immediately since it looks like zombies > are becoming a thing, but if you want proper procedure for > deregistering in future let's try this? > > I create the fo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: JA;tC

NttPF. On 10/30/2017 08:01 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > I support. > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: >> I intend to destroy JA:tC with 2 Agora Consent, on the basis that it has >> been judged INEFFECTIVE. >> >> -Aris >> >> On

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Surveyor Election Campaign Proposal Distribution

I vote in favour of proposal 7954. On 10/30/2017 09:38 AM, ATMunn wrote: > Doing it correctly this time! > Note: If you've already voted, you'll have to vote again. > > As the nomination period of the Surveyor election is over, and there > was only one candidate, o, the election is uncontested. >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3576 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus (Gaelan recused)

: >> I file a motion to reconsider. Supporters are PSS & Alexis. >> >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:34 AM, VJ Rada wrote: >>> I support >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >>>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 at 16:51 Publius Scri

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3576 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus (Gaelan recused)

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't fully understand the issue. I support. On 10/29/2017 05:07 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 at 16:51 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I judge CFJ 3576 TRUE becau

DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Honour Role

SHOGUN >+3 ATMunn >+2 Telnaior >+1 Trigon >+1 Nichdel >+1 Japan >+1 G. > 0 Alexis >-1 V.J. Rada >-1 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >-1 ProofTechnique >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Tailor] Ribbon Award

Interestingly for me, it works on a-b, but not a-o. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 27, 2017, at 9:59 PM, ATMunn wrote: > > Oops, Ntt...DF? > > For some reason, when replying to a-b or a-o threads, Thunderbird does not >

Re: DIS: Officer report scraping

Or someone who hosted a script that pushed reports to git on their computer. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:54 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > Elsewhere-hosted bot? > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Reuben Staley

Re: DIS: good FLR?

I believe the FLR that is currently online is accurate and it definitely includes all of the rules. On 10/27/2017 01:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I didn't follow all the corrections - is there a consensus as to what > recently-posted FLR draft is "most accurate" (needed for random picks > for

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Second Revised S:R

You cna change it by just lying and letting it ratify. On 10/27/2017 01:58 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Oct 23, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > >> -- >> >> Rule 2497/3

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

Thank you for the reminder, I missed that. On 10/26/2017 11:49 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> wrote: >> >> The other thing to note is that he was previously a player and continued >> to take player-

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] More Actions Should Use Agoran Consent

Thank you, I have checked the ruleset and you are correct. I thought that it was not required to be by announcement, but I was incorrect. On 10/26/2017 09:06 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Retraction of Proposals is not informal! > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Publius Scribonius Sch

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] More Actions Should Use Agoran Consent

But retraction is itself informal. On 10/26/2017 08:49 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > NttPF. > > -Aris > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:53 PM, ATMunn wrote: >> Ah. I retract the below proposal. I didn't pend it anyway, and obviously >> nobody will vote for it. >> >> >> On 10/25/2017 9:51 PM, Kerim Ay

Re: DIS: thesis thoughts

That should be a challenge. On 10/26/2017 04:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: >>>    Levels were:  AN 150, BN 250, Masters 750, Doctorate 1000 >> lol, our CFJs routinely go above those, we are smurt af. > Actually, it would be a real challenge to write a thesi

Re: DIS: thesis thoughts

I would rather err on the side of being overly wanting and give an A.N., rather than a M.N. On 10/26/2017 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I'm still struggling a bit "leveling" Alexis's thesis. By sheer length, > it is clearly more than a B.N. and would fit for Masters. However >

Re: DIS: Proto: Complete Economic Overhaul

While you're at it, could you rename Economics as Shinies? On 10/25/2017 09:29 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > In the interest of collaborating with everyone else that is working on > econ-related proposals, I'm posting the drafts of my Econ Overhaul as > they get written. Here's the first one. Would love

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

e with accepting evidence of > consent? (obviously this works for any future ratification). > > What if OscarMeyr came back and said - you know back in May and that > other CFJ - well actually I consent. > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> Howeve

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

However, this action should still be taken into account. On 10/25/2017 04:22 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > This doesn't affect the actual CFJ I called (because, as we all know, > CFJs are judged on the facts of their calling) but THIS might be the > player-like action we need to ratify ais523 in. > > On We

Re: DIS: Let's talk Economic Realities

One thing that would be interesting to try, but for a fixed period of time would be getting rid of officers and implementing IP restrictions to force people to specialize as officers. Then anyone who payed a certain fee for a license could act as an officer. Additionally, privatizing proposals and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

17, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> Actually, when this came up, e made a statement that could have been >> consent and I believe G. may have mentioned that he thought it could count. > No - not after the fact. > > The situation that CFJ 3456 allows this to work is is if a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report

Thank you, I missed that. On 10/25/2017 06:03 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > That's...what that document says. > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > CoE: The election for ruleke

DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

Actually, when this came up, e made a statement that could have been consent and I believe G. may have mentioned that he thought it could count. On 10/25/2017 03:18 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > By the way, I'm pretty sure that ais523 isn't a player? E was only > made a player by ratification, and CFJ 345

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution

I am not trying to hoard shinies, but I also do not want to just collapse the economy, but if anyone has any interesting contract ideas or things the require shinies, email me and I will probably help out. On 10/25/2017 02:25 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 1:51 AM, Madeline > <

Re: DIS: HLR inquiry

Yes, that is correct due to an error in the proposal. On 10/24/2017 10:36 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > Is it true that we have a rule whose title is “Campain Proposals, with power > 3” with power 1? Or is that a scrivener’s error? > > -o > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DIS: Questions for Trigon

Most of my errors can be attributed to either not yet understanding the system for generating the ruleset or Gaelan's errors. Now, that I understand how the raw files are processed better, I do not believe any new errors will be introduced. Additionally, to you and everyone, what concerns do you h

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report

------ > [1] Associate Director of Personnel > [2] Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > [3] Anyone may inititate elections for these positions without being > the ADoP or 4 support. > [4] Interim offices a

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Deputisation] Short Logical Ruleset

g that this works without notice. >> >> I intend, with 2 support, to initiate an election for Rulekeepor. >> >> -Alexis >> >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 21:00 Alexis Hunt wrote: >>> I believe this is INEFFECTIVE as you did not intend to do so? >&

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Revised FLR

;ve raised, along with some formatting issues in the YAML > files themselves, in my local copy of AgoraNomic/ruleset which I'll > push shortly. > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 20:34 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Herald] We'll win so much you'll be tired of winning

But once the action has been taken once, the decision has been resolved. On 10/23/2017 06:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I CFJ by spending a Shiny: G. won the game on 23 Oct 17. > > Arguments: > > Rule 208 reads: >The vote collector for an unresolved Agoran decision CAN resolve >i

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Revised FLR

Please describe the issue, it looks identical to what appears in the proposal to me. On 10/23/2017 06:19 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > A number of my previously issues, such as the text of rule 2309, > remain unfixed. > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 16:46 Publius Scribonius

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Deputisation] Short Logical Ruleset

dge? > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 16:43 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I announce my candidacy for Rulekeepor and pledge to fix the > margins, if > the issue is explained to me. > >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Revised FLR

would replace Obligations with a specific thing for Contracts. On 10/23/2017 10:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> THE FULL LOGICAL RULESET > Comments: > > 1. A bunch of these still have wrapping problems. If it d

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Deputisation] Short Logical Ruleset

>> >>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 21:00 Alexis Hunt wrote: >>>> I believe this is INEFFECTIVE as you did not intend to do so? >>>> >>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 20:57 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>>> wrote: >>>>>

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7923-7929

Not until after 7930. On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 22:57 Alexis Hunt wrote: > Will you be resolving 7922 soon? > > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 08:31 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I resolve the decision(s) to ado

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Agoran Newspaper Repeal

I agree with this and have written o, asking em, if e needed interim help. On 10/22/2017 07:49 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> By the by, I forgot o. is also the agronomist. I intend to deputize >> for the position to publish its weekly report. > I have to say, o

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Then, we need to rename the Tax Rate. On 10/22/2017 07:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Not apart from deregistration and administrative fees, neither of > which would normally be considered taxes. > > -Aris > > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Publius Scribonius Scho

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

We already have taxes. On 10/22/2017 07:39 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I submit the following proposal, and pend it for 1 AP. > > -Aris > --- > Title: It's death _and_ taxes > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Aris > Co-author(s): > > > Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brack

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Notice of Honour

ork into it or think e could just grab it, because of exactly > what you said, I assumed you were putting work in already. > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> I'd appreciate if you would at least waiit because I have already >> embarked on cle

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7923-7929

his second one supposed to resolve the decision correctly, or > merely to correct the previously published document? I argue that this > is sufficiently unclear as to fail the test required for "by > announcement", meaning that e does not actually resolve the decision > in

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent

I would be willing to do secretary. On 10/22/2017 12:46 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > I intend, in between 2 and 14 days, to deputize for the positions of > Referee and Surveyor, for the purposes of publishing the weekly > reports of each of those positions. > > I encourage someone with a stronger heart t

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Notice of Honour

Mine is sort of up to date. The Registrar's report should be there, but I need to find my SSH key password to push again. On 10/22/2017 12:10 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since I've been > a player. I think Gaelan took them out. > > JDGA: I'm ironical

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration and Apology

If supporting this message is allowable, I do so. On 10/20/2017 08:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I intend to destroy the universe with notice. > > -Aris > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >> I intend t win the game with two da

Re: DIS: Idea: Taxes

I too like this idea. At this point, I think we need to do a lot more experimental stuff and add a lot of mechanics and just see what sticks. On 10/20/2017 07:52 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 19:48 Kerim Aydin > wrote: > > I'm personally worki

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration and Apology

The shiny balance can not be negative because it is an asset, not a switch. On 10/20/2017 04:42 PM, Telnaior wrote: > I flip my Citizenship to Registered. > > For recordkeeping purposes, my username is Telnaior and I was > previously deregistered in 2014. > > Anyways, I'm going to apologise, I fe

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

Could you explain this objection? On 10/20/2017 07:07 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > No please no ratifying people out of existence thanks very much. > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >> Yes, he had, but it seems I missed that when

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

Yes, he had, but it seems I missed that when preparing a report, probably when I was transitioning computers. In my next report, I will ratify him away if he doesn't mind. On 10/19/2017 11:10 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 at 15:06 Publius Scribonius Scho

Re: DIS: eval()

5:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I disagree with this. I think the distinction is that you want Agora to work like USB, whereas now Agora works like PS/2. On 10/15/2017 08:45 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: There are many places where Agora essentially calls eval(T), where T is some

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

I know that I for one read over it and liked the idea and wasn't sure whether it was would work as is, but didn't have thoughts on how to improve it, therefore I didn't comment. I'm sorry that I wasn't very helpful, but I don't have ideas on how I could be. On 10/15/2017 08:35 PM, ATMunn . wr

Re: DIS: eval()

I disagree with this. I think the distinction is that you want Agora to work like USB, whereas now Agora works like PS/2. On 10/15/2017 08:45 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: There are many places where Agora essentially calls eval(T), where T is some text from a player. This includes: The rules, of

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7908-7921

You can't because you pended it with AP. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 15, 2017, at 8:27 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > > TTttPF > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:26 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > Is this new or am I not aware of somet

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7908-7921

#x27;re ok with that added duty PSS) On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: 7912* Alexis3.0 Election Campaigns Alexis 1 AP [2] So, um ... anyone want to opine on the status of the PM or ADoP elections?

Re: DIS: Semi-final draft: Contracts v3

See inline notes, below: On 10/15/2017 04:18 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: A new contracts version is affixed. -Aris --- Title: Contracts v5 Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Aris Co-author(s): o, G., ais523, Gaelan, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, V.J Rada, Trigon, Alexis, P.S.S. Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#"

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deregulation

Why not keep the birthday tournament. It existed before regulations. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 8:08 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Decided to put my money where my mouth is. > > Proposal: Deregulation (AI=3) >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

After rereading it, I don't understand the need for both a "to" and a "for". I think either would work on its own. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 7:16 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On

DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

Typo, see below. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 6:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > This is just a miscellaneous fix proposal: > > Proposal: High Power Cleanup (AI=3) > {{{ > Text in square brackets is not a sub

Re: DIS: Semi-final draft: Contracts v3

I'd be happy to review the latest version, but I don't want to use the last version because I won't know what has changed. Could you share your current copy? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Aris

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] ADoP and Prime Minister Elections

I'm not sure what happened. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 6:42 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > Replied to the wrong email? > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >>

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] ADoP and Prime Minister Elections

I got ENDORSE G. for Tailor. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 13, 2017, at 11:19 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > I change my vote for ADoP to {ATMunn, V.J. Rada} > > My PM vote remains for myself. > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 2

Re: DIS: Looking to pick up an office, maybe

I would be happy to let you take over Registrar. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 21:27 VJ Rada wrote: > If you want Registrar, you can initiate an election for the position > right now and stand for it. I don't know wheter PSS approves, e > certainly wants to retain that position. But if you want to try

Re: DIS: Proto: Revision Limits

I don't see why this should be the case because even if they have to revise it, it is still a lot of work to maintain. This will discourage people from taking offices. Also, on a technical level, you need to specify who will transfer the shinies. On 10/13/2017 02:50 AM, Reuben Staley wrote: I

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] Clearing up language confusion for new players

I agree that Agora should be language-agnostic for the most part. On 10/12/2017 09:47 AM, Josh T wrote: I object to this for hopefully obvious reasons, given my history with playing with language. 天火狐 On 12 October 2017 at 09:34, ATMunn . > wrote: Title:

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

17 02:36:25 V.J Rada paid the Community Chest 2 sh. Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:03:10 Agora paid 天火狐 5 sh. Wed, 11 Oct 2017 02:18:55 o paid 天火狐 2 sh. Wed, 11 Oct 2017 03:50:12 Agora paid V.J Rada 5 sh. [1] In full, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" Personal Lockouts: None Global Lockout

Re: DIS: Draft: Crime Improvements v2

I see multiple ones like G's. On 10/09/2017 10:38 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 at 10:28 Kerim Aydin > wrote: Not all that complex, though one must wait for the right circumstances. But the circumstances aren't too rare. We must have d

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7908-7921

Given that I went through many rounds of drafting with this, I wish you could have mentioned it. The problem that exists is the lack of the ability to stimulate the economy with stocks or allow debt. This resolves that by creating a mechanism for it. On 10/09/2017 09:19 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7908-7921

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:10 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > Silly season: FORx2 > No Lockout: FORx2 > What is a rulekeepor: AGAINSTx2 > Infinite Money Fix: FORx2 > Election Campaigns: FORx2 > Cheer up v

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making Quazie not the speaker aka who let me write self-ratifying reports because they should be fired.

l.com>> wrote: Well hey if we can't discern the minimal change then it didn't work at all, right? On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > This really boils down to a philosophical

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making Quazie not the speaker aka who let me write self-ratifying reports because they should be fired.

f the judge can't figure it out, then it didn't work. -Aris On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 5:18 PM VJ Rada <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote: Well hey if we can't discern the minimal change then it didn't work at all, right? On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:17 A

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making Quazie not the speaker aka who let me write self-ratifying reports because they should be fired.

This really boils down to a philosophical and logistical discussion of what constitutes the minimal change. On 10/08/2017 08:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: My guess is that doesn't work because up until the date of the ratified report I was Speaker and used some speaker powers. I'd say the minim

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3566 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

to make a failed attempt to perform an action, I see no such language in Rule 2426. So the lack of discussion on the INEFFECTIVE aspect of the case seems fatal to the judgement. On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 at 18:21 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> w

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3566 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

ILLEGAL and INEFFECTIVE. I was just being explicit about the ILLEGAL. On 10/08/2017 05:45 PM, VJ Rada wrote: Illegal or ineffective? They are different, especially in the card rules, On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I find CFJ 3566 TRUE. The issued card

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Archival disclosure

I wonder who the youngest Agoran ever has been. Does anyone know? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 6, 2017, at 3:46 AM, Quazie wrote: > > I played agora for the first time as a teenager - learned of nomic in high > school and pl

Re: BUS: CFJ 361 judged TRUE (Was: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3561 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus)

I don't believe this effects the idea of ratifying the purchase of shinies, but I do believe it does effect his action. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:21 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >> On Oct 2, 2017,

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3561 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

I find CFJ 3561 TRUE. I concur with the caller's arguments that while he was allowed to destroy the stamps, he was not capable of destroying the stamps. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2017, at 7:02 PM, Kerim Aydi

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Final Metareport

I already have this pended. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 1, 2017, at 10:26 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 at 22:13 VJ Rada wrote: > I apologize profusely. If anyone wants ADoP, it's all yours. I was > c

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport mark...9?

Yes, but the report is based on the effective date. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 1, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Except it *is* late now because it's October. > > On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 at 20:42 VJ Rada wrote:

Re: DIS: Criminal appeals/process reform

Mine is based on the Roman court system and integrates civil and criminal procedures. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 1, 2017, at 6:12 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > Is everyone working on one of these? P.S.S., what are you

Re: DIS: Criminal appeals/process reform

I like these ideas and will try to incorporate them into my upcoming courts overhaul. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 1, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > So, CFJ 3563 read as follows: > The Green card o

Re: DIS: GitHub Request

No, you need to enable GitHub Pages, but I would be happy to do that for you, fi you don't have time. There is a lot of documentation for it on the internet though. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 1, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Alexis Hun

Re: DIS: GitHub Request

Done. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 1, 2017, at 11:48 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Can someone please add me (github.com/alercah) to the GitHub organization so > that I can add the Tailor's report? > > Thanks! si

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Archival disclosure

I have used Node.JS before and I don't like it because it is using javascript for something it isn't supposed to be used for. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 29, 2017, at 5:29 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > > To be honest, al

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I attempt to Declare A NEW ERA

I'm not expressing an opinion on the era creation, I don't have a strong preference and I want to see how other votes are flowing, but I do agree with the principle expressed. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 28, 2017, at 9:3

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I attempt to Declare A NEW ERA

I agree. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 28, 2017, at 9:17 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > Unrelated: It would probs be a good idea to lower the power of lots of > our game mechanics and have it all be like 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 etc, allowing >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Archival disclosure

If I am elected, I would be happy to work with you on developing compatible systems. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:06 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > I change my assessor vote to [Gaelan, PSS, G]. If I can’t do it m

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Archival disclosure

I was introduced to it for stats, but now use it for all sorts of things. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 28, 2017, at 3:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >&

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Archival disclosure

I love Ruby. R is my favorite, behind it is Ruby and Python and C and Java behind them. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 28, 2017, at 12:29 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > [sits in corner with my Ruby-powered ruleset] > > Gaelan

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Passive Income

I like this. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 28, 2017, at 4:15 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I submit the following proposal: > > Title: Passive Income > Author: o > Co-authors: G. > AI: 2.0 > > Create a new rul

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Archival disclosure

I would be happy to help you code or annotate, whoever word you are using, each message. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 28, 2017, at 3:28 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> This is the first stage of an attempt to create an annot

DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] Experimental Bench procedure

I would be happy to take night court cases, if you ever start to be overloaded. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 28, 2017, at 12:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > Experimental procedure for assigning CFJs. You can just tell

DIS: Re: BUS: Take-backsies

Could ou explain the issue? I see a way to scam it to oneself, but I don't see an attempt by you to do that. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2017, at 9:41 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >> On Sep 27, 2017, at 12:35 P

DIS: Re: BUS: bye

You will be missed. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2017, at 12:38 PM, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > > I deregister > > > -grok signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: DIS: PROTO: Saving moiney with nested proposals

That would work for the first. For the Repeal All Cards, I am working on a more comprehensive repeal. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2017, at 4:55 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > Author: VJ > Title: A million proposals for the price

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Vital History Gone Missing!

I know and I have added the list to the Weekly Report. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2017, at 6:13 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > It doesn't. > > Also, I use GII to give 20 shinies to Trigon and Alexis. > > On We

DIS: Re: BUS: Vital History Gone Missing!

I do include a list of people deregistered by Writ of FAGE in the Monthly report because it does not say Registrar's report_s_, I interpreted this to fulfill the requirement. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:28 PM, Owen

Re: DIS: [Proto] Reposting

This could be done as an opt-in thing with Agencies. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 10:15 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > In light of our newer players’ issues with the groups, and my own, it might > be nice to allo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

See my comment below. Also, I greatly appreciate the current usage of Spivak pronouns/ Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:43 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > > I retract the proposal "Cheer Up" and create the follow

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

We could also overtime add nice emotions. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:39 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >> On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:34 PM, ATMunn . wrote: >> >> I create the following proposal: >

DIS: Re: BUS: My first proposal!

I don't mind this, except for the card SHOULD, which doesn't go with any potential rules violation. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:34 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > > I create the following proposal: > > T

Re: DIS: Proto: Very Important Reportor Amendment

I would be happy to do this, for the Registrar's report. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:27 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > Quick proto idea (doesn't even actually require a rule): have each > officer, when they

Re: DIS: Assessment

Would you mind if we made modifications? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:18 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > On 09/26/17 18:45, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> Could you provide your assessment script for your successor’s use

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >