On Wed, May 6, 2020, 16:20 Aris Merchant via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend, with 2 support, to group-file a motion to reconsider. I agree
> with the judge's verdict, but Warrigal's objections are sufficiently
> significant that they deserve an response on the re
On Wed, May 6, 2020, 14:36 Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/6/2020 10:44 AM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> > You seem to be saying that it's possible for a value to be unambiguous
> > despite being indetermina
G., you're making some interesting arguments.
Here's how I see things, first of all.
Let's suppose the rules say that a particular switch has two possible
values, A and B. To me, there are three possible situations here.
The first situation is that it is clear which value the switch has. In this
On Wed, May 6, 2020, 01:29 Rebecca via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Indeterminacy is different to "ambiguity". The indeterminacy here arises
> from the inability to determine the location of a certain game asset,
> rather than lack of clarity in the text of the rule
Does the rule actually say "an statue" currently? Proposal 8354
replaced "an instrument" with "a statute", and presumably the
Rulekeepor accidentally recorded the new wording as "an statue"
instead. Was the mistake ratified?
—Warrigal
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 7:41 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> I CFJ: "The entity once known as Rule 2601 is a rule."
Argument: One of the universal principles of modifiable systems of
rules is that once a rule (or portion of a rule) is removed from the
system, that rule (or portion of a
Respectfully, although Aris's thesis is interesting and well-written,
it doesn't seem to show a great amount of analysis or research effort.
I think that to be eligible for a degree, a thesis should show more
analysis or research than, say, a typical CFJ judgement.
Speaking of which, I think at le
Is this needed? What's an example of a circumstance in which this would
prevent something bad from happening?
—Warrigal
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 23:12 Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Joining contracts (consent) is one of those things you can't act-on-behalf
> to do (R2519), though you might decide to CFJ on clause 2.
>
Oh right. I did have a vague feeling that my acting-on-
> Mar 03 2020 01:50:
> Gaelan joined, purchased 3 shares and became president
CoE: You purchased 4 shares, not 3, and you did so via my t4pf a couple of
minutes ago.
—Warrigal
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 11:34 Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Well, we purposefully error-trapped switches, which suggests that we allow
> that sort of thing if the rules are explicit about it happening:
>
But an indeterminate value is merely one that "ca
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 08:23 Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> But yeah, even if it is tradition, I'm not against just going contrary to
> it since all we need to do that is enough people agreeing to do so, and I'd
> agree to it (although, probably not righ
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 06:45 Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > My proposal would just create an ambiguity in the rules, and we never
> judge DISMISS due to an ambiguity in the rules; we pick an interpretation
> instead.
>
> Why is this? (Is it just cultur
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 04:41 Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I think this would cause:
> - A big and spreading fog of war of CfJ DISMISS, because its "undecidable"
> and "insufficient information exists" to know what's going on with coins
>
My proposal w
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020, 14:50 Alexis Hunt via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> [This first proposal is a reform to the core rules defining what rules
> are, with an aim to better supporting subordinate legal documents. The
> intent is to enact very little change to the game a
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:44 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> In R2125/10 (power=3) there is the following:
> > A Regulated Action CAN only be performed as described by the
> > Rules, and only using the methods explicitly specified in the
> > Rules for performing the given
Gratuitous: Rule 1742 states that a contract must be made by "one or
more consenting persons", but it doesn't specify what it is, exactly,
that the persons must consent to. It would seem reasonable to
interpret this as meaning that the persons must have consented to the
creation of a contract with
H. Herald, I notice that I am listed on the Scroll of Agora under my
former names of Zachary Watterson and Tanner L. Swett; I humbly
request that these both be updated to Warrigal.
—Warrigal, who has settled on the name of Warrigal and does not intend
to change it again without good reason
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 2:55 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Perhaps relevant: CFJ 3762 [0], which concluded both that a person CAN
> perform a certain action and that that action is IMPOSSIBLE.
>
> [0]: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3762
H. I feel like that ca
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 5:01 PM AIS523--- via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 16:54 -0500, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > All other provisions of this contract notwithstanding, this contract
> > does not permit any entity to act on behalf of any
{{{
## Bylaw 1: Definition
This contract is named "the Dragon Corporation". The purpose of the
Dragon Corporation is to earn as much money as possible for its
shareholders.
All other provisions of this contract notwithstanding, this contract
does not permit any entity to act on behalf of any oth
{{{
This contract is named "the Zombie Market".
Any entity CAN become a party to this contract by announcement. Any
party to this contract CAN cease to be a party to this contract by
announcement, unless e is the master of a zombie and does not own that
zombie's Talisman.
For each zombie whose m
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020, 10:43 Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Did we ever get the results from the blackjack game? I think at least
> one person won their hand.
>
Yowch, it looks like I botched sending the final result message. I've sent
that now.
—Warri
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 14:12 Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > 8331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness
> Conditional: AGAINST if Warrigal votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT. I
> don't object in principle, but, I mean, you didn't _hav
I doubt that this really does anything. Presumably, "one party" means "one
person who is a party"; there's no means by which a single person can be
multiple parties.
On a related note, years ago, it was ruled that "I act on behalf of myself
to do X" means exactly the same thing as "I do X."
Back
Without objection, I intend to go off on a little bit of a tangent.
I like how, in many laws and regulations, bullet points are often used to
write an entire section as a single, potentially extremely long sentence.
To demonstrate, here's 14 CFR 61.23(a) (the requirement for pilots to hold
a medi
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020, 13:32 Aris Merchant via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 591 by inserting a period
> at the end of the first three bulleted list items.
>
> [It looks weird that some of the items have periods and others don't;
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 02:10 Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 10:43 PM Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> [...]
> > For what it's worth, I like this language (even though it will certainly
&g
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 01:05 omd via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Hmm... Good point. It shouldn't be. The point was to clarify that
> even if the gamestate doesn't have a list of legal fictions, legal
> fictions can still exist due to rules (which are themselves par
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 21:25 James Cook via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 2. Do you think my "Last Week in Agora" summaries are useful? Any other
>comments? So far I've acted unilaterally in writing them, just to
>get something started, but I'm open to doing th
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 19:41 omd via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> A rule may state or imply that 'X is treated as if it
> were Y', but this is considered an attempt to redefine X,
> subject to the usual standards for definitions.
>
What's the purpos
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:21 AM James Cook wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 01:30, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > then a legal fiction is established that the belief was true at the time of
> > the earliest public message indicating the belief; and the gamestat
Gratuitous postmortem arguments on CFJ 3796:
I don't think it's necessary to bring Rule 217 into this at all; scams
of this type simply can't work. I'll explain why I think that.
Imagine that the city of Grand Rapids, Michigan enacts an ordinance
which states that, the United States Constitution
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 22:37 Alexis Hunt via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend, with 2 Agoran Consent, to award twg the Patent Title of Associate
> of Nomic, subject to the conditions that the person performing the award
> pursuant to this intent is the Herald, the f
I have a half-serious half-proto-proposal:
"Implicit Ratification", AI: 3
Repeal all rules relating to ratification. Enact the following rule: {
In the course of playing the game, it is inevitable that from time to time,
an error in recordkeeping will occur and go unnoticed for such a long time
I've been thinking about what makes Agora difficult to play as compared to
other games.
Something I've noticed about the current rules is that lots of game actions
and effects are all woven together in such a way that if a mistake is made
with any piece of it, the mistake can quickly propagate and
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 12:31 Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> You kids and your timely fashions. When I was young, we did things as soon
> as possible both ways and we liked it!
>
You know, I *still* think of VVLOP and second-class persons (and
second-cl
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 18:43 Jason Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> [Informal title: "Pronouns"]
>
> {
>
> The singular non-gendered pronoun is "e" in the nominative, and "em" in
> the accusative. Do not use "they" as a singular pronoun. Do not use
> "he/him/his" or
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 3:50 PM Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
wrote:
> Matthew Berlin wrote:
> > If you publish a hash of the shoe beforehand, and the entire shoe
> > afterwards for verification of the hash, you might get more takers,
>
> I know next to nothing about blackjack, but that sou
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 3:08 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> CFJ: If a player other than Tanner Swett gives Tanner Swett 2 coins in
> reference to the quoted pledge, it creates a contract between Tanner Swett and
> that player.
Not-so-gratuitous arguments:
The Rules sta
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:06 AM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
> [...]
> > On Jan 23, 2020, at 8:36 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> > Of course, "TCC" stands for "the TCC Corporation."
>
> Shouldn’t this be TTC, t
It's never too late to try to found a company which aspires to take
over the world.
{
## Bylaw 1: Definition
This contract is named "the TCC Corporation". The purpose of the TCC
Corporation is to earn as much money as possible for its
shareholders.
Shares of TCC stock (herein
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 00:48 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> > Per Rule 2166 (“Assets”), I indent, without objection, to destroy
>> > Agora, no sooner than August 20th 2017, 01:00, Eastern time.
>>
>> Ju
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I claim that the following “report” contains an error. Henry is not the
> Secretary.
He sure isn't.
--Zachary Watterson
Well, you could do something pretty similar to what Bitcoin does. People
could publish a transaction log occasionally; whenever they do, they give
their transaction log a unique identifier and refer to some other
transaction log as its parent. Just like with Bitcoin, a published
transaction log isn
I think I'd it include it in the Ruleset with a note that it has been
repealed.
--the Warrigal
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Root = own parent was on purpose. Not sure if that screws up any
> tree math assumptions, but I didn't see any harm in making it so.
>
Well, it screws up the fact that no node is its own ancestor. Actually, I
think "every node except the ro
I think I'd say that any intentional line break constitutes a
paragraph break, except in unusual cases such as mailing addresses,
poetry, and ASCII art. Therefore, list items separated by intentional
line breaks are separate paragraphs (and may be multiple paragraphs
each). Blank lines don't really
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> comment, please:
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/agora/rules/
I like it. I personally would prefer if everything were expanded
initially, and then maybe there could be buttons for collapsing.
Also, you seem to have a couple of element
Some feedback...
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I create this proposal:
>
>
>
> Title: $$$
> Author: Gaelan
> AI: 3.1
Having an AI greater than 3 isn't necessary, since proposals with
power
At the moment, I don't know of any places in the rules where a
low-powered instrument is allowed to mess with a high-powered
instrument. It would be nice if we could go from "we don't know of
any" to "there aren't any".
—the Warrigal
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:15 AM, omd wrote:
>> 7782+ the Warrigal 3.0 Power Always Controls Mutability
> AGAINST - this would prevent proposals from modifying Power>3 rules,
> because Rule 106 is Power 3
How would it do that? Under this proposal, just like right now, Rule
2140 "Power Controls
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Ok, here's what the first paradox was... What's your pseudo-judgement?
>
> The Not Your Turn card would cancel the effect of any card played
> in the last 24 hours (meant as a defense card).
>
> The Discard Picking card let you grab any card dis
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2015 12:24, "omd" wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Tanner Swett
>> wrote:
>> > Rule 2358, which defined Win by Paradox, was present in the ruleset
>> > published on 25 August 2013
Rule 2358, which defined Win by Paradox, was present in the ruleset
published on 25 August 2013, but absent in the ruleset published on 17
December 2013. I couldn't find any proposals which repealed the rule.
So where did it go?
(I don't miss it, and I would oppose any attempt to put it back.)
—t
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:55 AM, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:43 AM, tmanthe2nd . wrote:
>> Proposals 7773 and 7774 gives the wrong ID number for the rule it amends.
>> Rule 2455 does not exist. So, the proposals don't actually do anything.
>
> So they do. Nice catch.
Though if you as
(I don't actually plan to submit a proposal along these lines any time
soon; this is just an idea.)
Create a rule with power 3, titled "Security Groups":
A Security Group is a certain type of entity. A Security Group with
power 0 cannot exist; if such a Security Group somehow exists, it
immediate
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> I agree with ais523's interpretation that the the minimum of four and
> none is four; mathematically, this seems to make sense: If we assume
> {'none'} = {} and "minimum of a and b := min {a,b}", then "minimum of
> none and four" evaluates to
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:41 AM, tmanthe2nd . wrote:
> I, Tristan Bredeweg would like to register as a player in Agora Nomic.
Welcome to our humble nation. We hope you enjoy your stay.
—the Warrigal
Jonatan Kilhamn)
Player 509: aranea (Luis Ressel)
Player 510: G. (Kerim Aydin)
Player 511: Ienpw III (James Beirne)
Player 512: Joe Piercey
Player 513: stadjer
Player 514: scshunt (Sean Hunt)
Player 515: the Warrigal (Tanner Swett)
Player 516: ironiridis
Player 517: Gaelan Steele
Player 518: Tekneek
--
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> In interpreting the functioning of assets, assets should generally
> be assumed to be indivisible physical objects in the possession of
> their owners, and that transfers between owners are "in person".
For the first cl
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> minor problems with the proposal (e.g. the way it defines a process that
> carries on over time is something that I'm not sure works under Agoran
> law, and potentially carries on after the repeal of the rule if it does;
> and the ). Also, we di
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:57 PM, omd wrote:
> - REMIT: The case becomes open again, and the current judge is
> recused. The Arbitor SHALL NOT assign em to the case again
> unless no other eligible judges have displayed interest in
> judging.
If no eligible judges h
I vote:
> 7763* scshunt 1.0 Official References
AGAINST; this seems like it doesn't accomplish anything at all
> 7764* scshunt 1.0 Prime Ministerial Perks
FOR
> 7765* scshunt 2.0 Centralization
FOR
> 7766* scshunt 1.0 Timelines
Conditional: FOR if ais523's vote i
Also, has Agora tried approval voting lately? I think it's snazzy.
—the Warrigal
I don't like the lack of encapsulation here.
Under this proposal:
Rules 2154 and 2444 say "The valid options are ordered lists of one or
more valid preference."
Rule 955 says "If the valid options are ordered lists of preferences,
[instant runoff stuff happens]."
I think this would be better:
R
By the way, should I retract this proposal and resubmit it with a
clause installing me? I mean, I'm planning to take the office anyway.
--the Warrigal
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> Proposal, "The Resistance", AI 1.5:
>>
>> Create a rule with power 1.5, titled "Gothur and Yufel":
>
> I'm not voting for any new office without
My sole shortlist proposal is 7698 "Ribbons 2014".
--the Warrigal
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
>> - Dive (Referee): The Prime Minister issues a specified Card
>> to a specified specified player. In doing so, the Prime
>> Minister SHOULD cite a specific grievance against that player,
>> not necessarily a violat
What is allowing rules with power less than 1 intended to accomplish?
—the Warrigal
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Luis Ressel wrote:
>> The voting period for the Assessor election has been extended per
>> R2168; please cast your votes before the new deadline on Jul 14,
>> 21:06 UTC.
>>
>> Please consider yourself humiliated by the necce
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> This half doesn't work; you can't schedule future actions in Agora
> without an actual message being sent at the time of the action.
> (Sometimes there's a workaround based on causing parts of other people's
> messages to be sent by you, but I do
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Luis Ressel wrote:
>> I award myself a Gray Ribbon.
>
> You know, renaming this game "Tailor is kingmaker, don't bother" really
> takes the interest out of this for me.
There shall be blood. We demand it.
—the Worgen
Does HTML show up in archives correctly?
—the Warrigal
Some good points. Here's some new wording that I think would fix the problems:
Enlistment is a player switch, tracked by the Weird, with values
Unenlisted (default), Enlisted, and Ineligible. While there is Peace,
any player (except the Weird) CAN flip eir Enlistment to Unenlisted or
Enlisted by a
Some autofeedback:
"every Yufel Enlisted players" should be "every Yufel Enlisted
player". It's not clear what happens when there's a change of Leader
while step 1 is ongoing; I'm thinking that the clock should restart.
Step 2 should say "Proposed Mission" instead of "mission". Step 3
should clari
Proposal, "The Resistance", AI 1.5:
Create a rule, titled "Gothur and Yufel":
The Weird is an office.
Enlistment is a player switch, tracked by the Weird, with values
Unenlisted (default) and Enlisted. Any player CAN flip eir
Enlistment by announcement, but if a player's
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, woggle wrote:
> Warrigal, thetannersweet at gmail.com25 Apr 15
tannerswett, not tannersweet.
--the Warrigal
June 2014
---
—$(players['Tanner Swett'].nickname)
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> > We saw it begin to happen with the Dungeon Master a couple months ago;
>> > people
>> > jumped in. But then a bug happened, and the original D.M. didn't care
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> In all seriousness, I think most dead periods ended when someone put forward
> a new Proposal with a set of new rules for a new Game Play idea, and also ran
> it long enough to work out the bugs in the idea. If the game is relatively
> easy to
On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Nov 2014, omd wrote:
>>A rule which purports to allow a person (a special deputy) to
>
> Haha. This was called "Limited Power of Attorney" 10 years ago.
>
> I only mention it now because it was one mechanism around which
> "contrac
On Oct 30, 2014, at 8:55 PM, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
>> 7711 omd1.0 Wordplay
>
> By the way, it was pointed out that this violates the recently
> arguably reestablished custom of installing an officer, so I probably
> should have changed it. But
On Oct 30, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2014 1:02 PM, "Henri Bouchard" wrote:
>>> If it is that difficult for the recordkeepors, couldn't we just raise
>>> the sa
On Oct 30, 2014, at 3:43 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 30 October 2014 04:45, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> On Oct 24, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>> I punch the Bard in the face.
>>
>> Inside the inn, we find the Bard and some unknown character, whom we
On Oct 30, 2014 1:02 PM, "Henri Bouchard" wrote:
> If it is that difficult for the recordkeepors, couldn't we just raise
> the salary of the recordkeepors in order to compensate for the burden?
> Isn't that the purpose of the variable office salary?
Well, we can increase salaries all we want, but
On Oct 24, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I create a Province character called Redgroat. Redgroat looks around.
>
> —the Warrigal
Redgroat finds emself on a road leading through a hamlet known as Knifford, a
quiet place surrounded by farmland and forests. The buildings that h
Is there a reason you didn't just say "in Rule 1023 'Common Definitions',
change 'within 7 days' to 'within 4 days'"?
--the Warrigal
On Oct 28, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I think it would be fun if the number of players self-ratified, then you
> have to read down the list and see who doesn't make the cut. -G.
I change my nickname to Aaa.
—the Warrigal
On Oct 27, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> TPF is over there. TPTTPF.
This public to the public forum?
—the Warrigal
On Oct 26, 2014, at 10:51 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> Amend Rule 2160 "Deputisation" by appending the paragraph
>>
>> A rule which purports to allow a person to specially deputise
>> under particular ci
A figure, a little shorter than the average adult human, and wearing a black
robe and a hood that completely covers eir face, walks into the room. E
approaches a chair, and puts a gloved hand on the back of the chair, but does
not sit down.
"I am the Warrigal," the person says in a strange voic
On Oct 26, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> For perspective, my personal favorite times in the game were mid-2001
> (tri-currency zombie auctions)and 2005 (Discordian Cards).
I'll have to check those archives out.
—the Warrigal
On Oct 26, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Eritivus wrote:
>
> So what is the full text of the rule change? I worried that it might be
> the full diff of the rules the change would effect, which is not
> directly included in Henri's proposal, and which seems too restrictive.
I'd say "text of a rule change" mea
On Oct 25, 2014, at 10:09 PM, omd wrote:
>
> When correcting a botched Shopping Period initiation, King Azaz
> MAY and SHOULD reuse random values as appropriate instead of
> recalculating everything anew.
The opposite convention would be more unambiguous. And more conventional, I
Arguments: When I first joined Agora, back in 'oh-such-and-such, contracts,
including partnerships and assets, were among my favorite aspects of the game.
They were one of the defining features of Agora, setting it apart from B Nomic
as "the awesome nomic". (Another feature I really liked was th
I note that Rule 2426 "Cards" doesn't contain anything stating (for Cards other
than Black) that the person to whom the Card is issued must be the same as the
person who violated the rules.
—the Warrigal
On Oct 25, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
>
> I call for judgement on the following statement:
>
> "G submitted Proposal: Defining Reasonable Review"
>
> Argument: It is unclear whether or not G submitted the Proposal:
> Defining Reasonable Review because e does not state that e submits
On Oct 4, 2014, at 2:39 PM, woggle wrote:
>
> Warrigal, thetannerswett at gmail.com 5 Aug 14
Belated thanks.
—Warrigal, the
1 - 100 of 464 matches
Mail list logo
