Re: [algogeeks] print all numbers in a given range without using any loop statements, jump statements and recursion

2011-10-07 Thread saurabh singh
https://ideone.com/APUpv On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:12 AM, shiva@Algo shiv.jays...@gmail.com wrote: cant find in archives plz someone On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Sahil Garg garg.sahi...@gmail.com wrote: plz post the soln.. i cant find it.. Sahil Garg Computer Engineering Delhi

Re: [algogeeks] print all numbers in a given range without using any loop statements, jump statements and recursion

2011-10-07 Thread tanuj chawla
#includeiostream int i; class A { public: A(){couti++endl;} ~A(){cout--iendl;} } int main() { A a[100]; return 0; } On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:42 PM, shiva@Algo shiv.jays...@gmail.com wrote: cant find in archives plz someone On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Sahil Garg garg.sahi...@gmail.com

Re: [algogeeks] print all numbers in a given range without using any loop statements, jump statements and recursion

2011-10-07 Thread shiva@Algo
Thanx ,owesome soln... On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:44 AM, tanuj chawla houndhun...@gmail.com wrote: #includeiostream int i; class A { public: A(){couti++endl;} ~A(){cout--iendl;} } int main() { A a[100]; return 0; } On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:42 PM, shiva@Algo

Re: [algogeeks] another group?

2011-10-07 Thread shady
no, just two group algogeeks - algorithms interview-street - job related questions, interview questions, guidance, books request if questions are algorithmic in nature then you can ask it in either of the group... just be specific while asking questions and do search the archives before asking.

Re: [algogeeks] print all numbers in a given range without using any loop statements, jump statements and recursion

2011-10-07 Thread rahul sharma
it will work without having --i in destructor???y is it here? On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:44 AM, tanuj chawla houndhun...@gmail.com wrote: #includeiostream int i; class A { public: A(){couti++endl;} ~A(){cout--iendl;} } int main() { A a[100]; return 0; } On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at

Re: [algogeeks] another group?

2011-10-07 Thread arvind kumar
great idea..totally agreed! :) On 10/7/11, shady sinv...@gmail.com wrote: no, just two group algogeeks - algorithms interview-street - job related questions, interview questions, guidance, books request if questions are algorithmic in nature then you can ask it in either of the group...

Re: [algogeeks] print all numbers in a given range without using any loop statements, jump statements and recursion

2011-10-07 Thread tanuj chawla
@rahul - ya sure. i write the code for printing 1 to 100 and vice versa.. u can remove --i in the destructor.. sorry... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To

Re: [algogeeks] print all numbers in a given range without using any loop statements, jump statements and recursion

2011-10-07 Thread rahul sharma
yeah fyn On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:18 PM, tanuj chawla houndhun...@gmail.com wrote: @rahul - ya sure. i write the code for printing 1 to 100 and vice versa.. u can remove --i in the destructor.. sorry... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread Abhishek
Do you think we require two group. it will be good if we post all query in one group. it is up to people who want to read or reply the mail On Oct 7, 12:25 am, arvind kumar arvindk...@gmail.com wrote: great idea..totally agreed! :) On 10/7/11, shady sinv...@gmail.com wrote: no, just two

Re: [algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread Amol Sharma
@abhishek: +1...let the group be limited to only one and read and reply to mail you like.. -- Amol Sharma Third Year Student Computer Science and Engineering MNNIT Allahabad http://gplus.to/amolsharma99

[algogeeks] Re: implementation of malloc

2011-10-07 Thread Rahul Tiwari
http://www.sendspace.com/file/wxqx5l On Oct 7, 10:09 am, saurabh singh saurab...@gmail.com wrote: It uses the system call brk On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:23 AM, praneethn praneeth...@gmail.com wrote: can somebody provide the link or explain how malloc is implemented internally as

Re: [algogeeks] Re: IVY comptech????

2011-10-07 Thread vijay singh
Its coming on 12 Oct 2011 NIT Warangal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For

Re: [algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread sunny agrawal
No, 2 Groups will be better because now a days 95% of the mails are regarding companies, rather than mails part most of the people are joining this group only because of this, because they are told by their friends that here most recent Company interview Questions are posted. 1. Most of the

[algogeeks] Algo

2011-10-07 Thread Deepak arora
Please tell the algo of this problem hasPathSum() We'll define a root-to-leaf path to be a sequence of nodes in a tree starting with the root node and proceeding downward to a leaf (a node with no children). We'll say that an empty tree contains no root-to-leaf paths. So for example, the

Re: [algogeeks] Waiting list in Qualcomm

2011-10-07 Thread muruga vel
In written round 3 sections are thereThere is a time limit for each section and you can't jump from one section to other section 1)Logical Reasoning and Quants (Basic) 2)Algorithms and flowchart 3)Os and Data structures It was pretty easy...But aware of the time... 20 out of 80 were selcted

[algogeeks] Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread .itoa
We are not supposed to use any loop. So that leaves us with recursion. I get the idea and it was working too. But i couldn't UNDERSTAND how the recursion was working. Can someone explain how recursion would work in that case please? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [algogeeks] Algo

2011-10-07 Thread anshu mishra
wat is ur question finding maximum path sum or anything other than this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread arvind kumar
Exactly..two groups needed! :) On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:42 PM, sunny agrawal sunny816.i...@gmail.comwrote: No, 2 Groups will be better because now a days 95% of the mails are regarding companies, rather than mails part most of the people are joining this group only because of this, because

[algogeeks] Infotrellis

2011-10-07 Thread Beginner
Does Infotrellis visited any campus ? What kind of questions they would ask?any idea ..Help immediately -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [algogeeks] Infotrellis

2011-10-07 Thread shady
omg... speechless... are you crazy ? On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Beginner murugavidya1...@gmail.com wrote: Does Infotrellis visited any campus ? What kind of questions they would ask?any idea ..Help immediately -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [algogeeks] Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread shady
i am bit confused... how come using recursion makes this in-place recursion occurs with a stack.. so you will be piling up more and more variables each time... ? On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, .itoa nitm...@gmail.com wrote: We are not supposed to use any loop. So that leaves us with

Re: [algogeeks] Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread .itoa
Hmm i guess you are correct! Recursion would require stacking up. Then how are we going to do it ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [algogeeks] Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread .itoa
But , let's say if we do by recursion , then could you explain the way it would work ? And this in-place keyword is not clear to me. Does it mean we can't use buffer / temporary variables or something else? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm

Re: [algogeeks] Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread Carl Barton
An in place algorithm is one which only uses a constant amount of extra memory. So recursion is a problem as it will use an implicit stack of size O(n) which is linear extra memory, not constant. On 7 October 2011 15:16, .itoa nitm...@gmail.com wrote: But , let's say if we do by recursion ,

[algogeeks] Re: Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread sravanreddy001
I'm not sure if I got the question correct. How about change the address of stack to point to top and then modify the push,pop functions to retrieve values as push(int a){ stack[--top] = a; } int pop(){ return (stack[a++]); } I know there is serious limitation of not able to add

Re: [algogeeks] Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread sravanreddy001
in place means: use constant extra space in simple terms O(1) space -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/nDVS4k7fF34J. To post to this group,

[algogeeks] Re: Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread .itoa
If initially we have : 4 3 2 1 then we need this : 1 2 3 4 We need to do in-place. Even if we can do with loops then how. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To view this discussion on the web visit

[algogeeks] Re: Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread sravanreddy001
yeah... i think its not possible without manipulating the pointers and then use general retrieval logic. reversal retrieval cannot be done without extra space, and without modifying the DS. (like I mentioned before, changing the stack to point to top manipulating the push, pop functions.)

Re: [algogeeks] Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread Ankur Garg
To do inplace stack reversal u need a mechanism by which u can transfer the first node to last of the stack making sure u have count of other nodes here Say u have stack 5- top 4 3 2 1 The answer should generate the stack as 1-top 2 3 4 5 This give hints to recursion . A normal recursive func

[algogeeks] Re: Tree Center Problem

2011-10-07 Thread vikas
use All Pair Shortest Path On Oct 6, 11:11 am, Nitin Nizhawan nitin.nizha...@gmail.com wrote: hi,    given a tree with N nodes find the node such that its average total distance from each other node is smallest       i.e.  if nodes are labeled 0N-1 then          find i such that    [

[algogeeks] Re: Operating System

2011-10-07 Thread Brijesh
Yeah...anyone plz tell good book for OS concepts -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/aVShOmMEE_cJ. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread Hatta
the problem is that I have to open and read several emails about jobs actually to be more precise currently there are more emails about jobs and interviews than about algorithms. it's really annoying to mute all threads. really really annoying. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Abhishek

Re: [algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread Hatta
two groups! two groups! On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, shiva@Algo shiv.jays...@gmail.com wrote: two grp will be good On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:39 AM, arvind kumar arvindk...@gmail.com wrote: Exactly..two groups needed! :) On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:42 PM, sunny agrawal

Re: [algogeeks] Re: implementation of malloc

2011-10-07 Thread Hatta
Im sorry bro, but this paper sucks. 6 pages of shallow information and obvious code. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Rahul Tiwari rahultiwari6...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.sendspace.com/file/wxqx5l On Oct 7, 10:09 am, saurabh singh saurab...@gmail.com wrote: It uses the system call

[algogeeks] Re: Algo

2011-10-07 Thread tpawan10
use DFS. at any poit of time if u find a node such that it has no left and right child, then you are at leaf. find sum of all values in the stack. for that u can use another stack. On Oct 7, 4:15 pm, Deepak arora deepakarora...@gmail.com wrote: Please tell the algo of this problem

Re: [algogeeks] Re: Operating System

2011-10-07 Thread Vishal Beri
You can try Operating System Concepts and Principles by Gelvin On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Brijesh brijeshupadhyay...@gmail.comwrote: Yeah...anyone plz tell good book for OS concepts -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To

Re: [algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread shady
Hatta :D please join acm_practice group, we will solve lot of algorithmic problems there. :) On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Hatta tmd...@gmail.com wrote: two groups! two groups! On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, shiva@Algo shiv.jays...@gmail.com wrote: two grp will be good On Fri, Oct

Re: [algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread Hatta
thanks bro! I'll join the list... On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:27 PM, shady sinv...@gmail.com wrote: Hatta :D please join acm_practice group, we will solve lot of algorithmic problems there. :) On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Hatta tmd...@gmail.com wrote: two groups! two groups! On Fri,

[algogeeks] Re: Algo

2011-10-07 Thread Deepak arora
we find sum of all path... like- path 1: 5 4 11 7=27 path 2: 5 4 11 2=22 path 3: 5 8 13=26 path 4: 5 8 4 1 =18 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from

[algogeeks] Re: Algo

2011-10-07 Thread Deepak arora
thanks tpawan10 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit

[algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread arvinthdd
sorry for tail gating. could you please share me the link to this group? tried few groups in google groups. Is this DVC programing group? pls guide. TIA. On Oct 7, 9:27 pm, shady sinv...@gmail.com wrote: Hatta :D please join acm_practice group, we will solve lot of algorithmic problems there.

Re: [algogeeks] Re: another group?

2011-10-07 Thread Hatta
I just searched for acm_practice within this group and found the link ;-) On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:09 PM, arvinthdd arvint...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for tail gating. could you please share me the link to this group? tried few groups in google groups. Is this DVC programing group? pls guide.

Re: [algogeeks] explain the output please.....

2011-10-07 Thread Raghav Garg
*pass1 fail2 fail2 this will be the o/p of above code what is the problem in this? this is perfectly fine.. *Thanking you *With regards- Raghav garg Contact no. 9013201944 www.facebook.com/rock.raghavag B. tech (IT), 5th sem University School Of Information Technology Guru Govind Singh

Re: [algogeeks] explain the output please.....

2011-10-07 Thread gaurav yadav
@raghav garg...run the code and see the output,the output comes fail1pass2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [algogeeks] explain the output please.....

2011-10-07 Thread Raghav Garg
i have run the program in turbo c and getting same o/p as i wrote earlier.. which compiler you are using? On 10/8/11, gaurav yadav gauravyadav1...@gmail.com wrote: @raghav garg...run the code and see the output,the output comes fail1pass2 -- You received this message because you are

Re: [algogeeks] explain the output please.....

2011-10-07 Thread gaurav yadav
* im using devc compiler * when if(ci) is encountered since integer has higher precedence over char ,so char is type casted to int so, (ci) is equivalent to (-64-32) which is false ,so fail1 is printed, -16 is converted to 4,294,967,295 - 16=4,294,967,280(so it is unsigned now) for(iu) integer i

Re: [algogeeks] explain the output please.....

2011-10-07 Thread gaurav yadav
hey raghav my turbo c compiler gives output fail1pass2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

[algogeeks] Re: explain the output please.....

2011-10-07 Thread Rahul Tiwari
o/p - fail1 pass2 xplaination - as char range = (-127 to +127) so char c=-64 is ok so (ci) condition z not true ..so else part got executed . but u is unsigned so its actual value z , u = some very high + no. so iu cond is true -- so the final o/p --- fail1 pass2 if u want to

[algogeeks] Re: IVY comptech????

2011-10-07 Thread htross
please post wat kind of questions wer asked in the written test On Oct 7, 4:01 pm, vijay singh vijaysinghb...@gmail.com wrote: Its coming on 12 Oct 2011 NIT Warangal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this

[algogeeks] Re: Operating System

2011-10-07 Thread saurabh araiyer
OS by Crowly (design oriented approach) is a nice book -- Regards Saurabh Araiyer http://www.decapsulatingabstraction.blogspot.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to

[algogeeks] Re: unix book

2011-10-07 Thread saurabh araiyer
Try sumitabha das -- Regards Saurabh Araiyer decapsulatingabstraction.blogspot.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [algogeeks] Re: Operating System

2011-10-07 Thread Rahul
CROWLEY +1 Rahul On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:26 AM, saurabh araiyer siz...@gmail.com wrote: OS by Crowly (design oriented approach) is a nice book -- Regards Saurabh Araiyer http://www.decapsulatingabstraction.blogspot.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [algogeeks] unix book

2011-10-07 Thread Hatta
advanced programming in unix envirnment -- stevens the unix programming envirnment -- rob pike On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:37 AM, bihari kumarvive...@gmail.com wrote: tell me good books on unix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks

Re: [algogeeks] Re: explain the output please.....

2011-10-07 Thread rahul sharma
o/p : fail 1 between c and u they will be in range so stored as it is but i is -16 converted to 2 complement n become -32 thats y On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Rahul Tiwari rahultiwari6...@gmail.comwrote: o/p - fail1 pass2 xplaination - as char range = (-127 to +127) so char c=-64

Re: [algogeeks] IVY comptech????

2011-10-07 Thread Wasif Hossain
Humble query to Admin: Is this question still relevant to this group by now when interview-street is running properly? On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:26 AM, htross htb...@gmail.com wrote: Does anybody know what kind of questions are asked in ivy comptech??? '' -- You received this message because

Re: [algogeeks] Algo for in-place Stack Reversal.

2011-10-07 Thread Wasif Hossain
@Ankur: +1 On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Ankur Garg ankurga...@gmail.com wrote: To do inplace stack reversal u need a mechanism by which u can transfer the first node to last of the stack making sure u have count of other nodes here Say u have stack 5- top 4 3 2 1 The answer

Re: [algogeeks] Re: Algo

2011-10-07 Thread Dheeraj Sharma
try this..after passing root pointer and 0 to the function void summer(node *r,int sum) { if(r) { if(!r-left !r-right) { coutsum+r-dataendl; return; } summer(r-left,sum+(r-data));