On 18-Jan-08, at 3:11 PM, Jared Johnson wrote:
I've made a bit of progress though, I found /var/log/qpsmtpd/
qpsmtpd.log which has the following output:
FATAL PLUGIN ERROR: Can't coerce GLOB to string in entersub at /
usr/lib/perl/5.8/Data/Dumper.pm line 179.
So perhaps Data::Dumper is
On 18-Jan-08, at 3:34 PM, Brian Szymanski wrote:
Thanks all for your responses. So, to be clear, moving to -async from
-forkserver should be a performance win, even if the plugins stay as
they are?
Still depends what your plugins are, and what your mail profile is.
If you're processing 200
On 18-Jan-08, at 2:39 PM, Chris Lewis wrote:
When we deploy, if the then-current spamd/clamd don't work at
production
volumes, we'll make those servers run forkserver, and leave the trap
servers as async.
Regarding that, I have a gearman setup at $work which works really
well for running
On 18-Jan-08, at 11:36 AM, Brian Szymanski wrote:
If we want to migrate from 0.3x forkserver to 0.42 async, do we
need to
change our plugins at all?
I seem to remember some discussion of this, but can't find it for the
life of me...
What kinds of things do plugins need to avoid in an
On 18-Jan-08, at 12:52 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 12:19 -0500, Matt Sergeant wrote:
What kinds of things do plugins need to avoid in an asynchronous
world?
Blocking. :-)
Could you elaborate a little on this or provide a reference (link not
biblio).
Sure. Basically I
On 18-Jan-08, at 2:49 PM, Jared Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing my first qp plugin, in order to write logs to our
custom db when a message is queued. I first wrote a small routine
to simply dump $self and $transaction in order to better understand
the resources available for plugin
On 16-Jan-08, at 10:25 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Hanno Hecker wrote:
There's no real queueing mechanism with the smtp-forward plugin, the
mail will be rejected with a temporary error, which means the mail
will
stay in the client's queue and sent later again... well at
I think it sends a 4xx error back to the sender, which means they
will queue it for resend at their end. I haven't tested this though.
On 15-Jan-08, at 10:38 AM, David Bouw wrote:
I installed qsmtpd last weekend to give it a try.
I opted to install it on a different machine and used the
On 18-Dec-07, at 7:36 PM, David Sparks wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone noticed the poll server running out of order when under
high load? I can connect to one of my qp servers and successfully do
most of a smtp transaction before the banner even arrives. Session
dump:
# telnet 1.2.3.4 25
Trying
On 18-Dec-07, at 10:54 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
mail from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 mx1 Hi [4.3.2.1] [4.3.2.1]; I am so happy to meet you.
...
250 Queued!
220 220 mx ESMTP custom banner here;
Ah, OK - I see what your point is. The banner appears to have been
On 21-Dec-07, at 3:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently developing a plugin which tries to connect back to the
client in order to check if it is a real smtp server.
Don't do that. There are good reasons why you might want to split
sending and receiving servers.
You could check
On 3-Dec-07, at 2:45 PM, Niklas Therning wrote:
I'm writing a qpsmtpd plugin for our custom spam filter. The plugin
reads a couple of custom configuration files at startup. The config
files may change at any time and I would like my plugin to pick up
those changes automatically.
Now,
On 30-Nov-07, at 11:58 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is the license change on qmail likely to change the direction of
qpsmtpd?
Doubtful. Qpsmtpd wasn't written because of a dislike of the license.
An interesting move though.
Matt.
On 27-Nov-07, at 9:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had a look at the webmail example and am not much the wiser.
Could someone have a look at my plugin and give me a big kick in
the right direction so I can make it use continuations please?
OK, so in AxKit continuations are designed for
On 27-Nov-07, at 11:35 AM, Martijn wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 7:45 PM, Lars Skjærlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if not (they're just warnings after all), how to
stop them from clogging the error log file. (They occur, even though
I've set Apache's LogLevel to 'error' - though if this is really
On 27-Nov-07, at 8:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) $bbref should be stored somewhere, but where? I presume in the
notes
of something. If this is correct, which notes and how do I get them?
I suppose Ax2/Danga somehow maintains a list of watched fds along
with a
persitent data structure?
On 27-Nov-07, at 12:21 PM, Vince LaMonica wrote:
} So at this level $r isn't in scope. At least not the proper AxKit
$r. You need
} to be in the main output stage of the XSP page for the right $r
to be valid.
Thanks for the help - it is much appreciated! The only issue is
that this
code
On 29-Oct-07, at 4:32 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
Is there any reason that $self-qp-sock couldn't be set to STDIN
for non-async variants?
Don't think there's any particular reason, no.
Though I should note that the patch doesn't work :-) SSL with async
is going to be really hard to implement
On 29-Oct-07, at 6:11 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Though I should note that the patch doesn't work :-) SSL with
async is going to be really hard to implement (though doable).
Why harder than it's been in perlbal / djabberd?
No harder
Hanno Hecker wrote:
I can't test with -async, because Matt's last change involved some
changes that's not available on CPAN (Event::Lib 1.03 does not have the
dns export), reverting to the old ParaDNS works.
Yeah, that was a bad commit. I'll try and revert it.
On 3-Oct-07, at 9:45 PM, Tom Callahan wrote:
I've been doing some performance analysis of a qpsmtpd instance I
have set up. Using async with SPF,database-driven rcpt to
checker,anglebrackets,logging/file,queue/smtp-forward can drop
~76msgs per second to invalid senders and deliver ~23
On 4-Oct-07, at 7:59 AM, Chris Lewis wrote:
Sending here. Code shamelessly stolen from qpsmtpd-forkserver
Thanks. Applied.
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please
On 4-Oct-07, at 1:00 PM, Chris Lewis wrote:
Chris Lewis wrote:
Any idea why I'd be getting these:
_convert_to_ssl failed (Could not create SSL socket: Socket
operation on non-socket at ./plugins/tls line 158
[At end of _convert_to_ssl(), I'm logging $@ if it's non-null]
I've confirmed,
On 3-Oct-07, at 5:25 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
Chris Lewis wrote:
I've hacked qpsmtpd-async to support daemonization and pid locking
files. Rather than dig into SVN, who should I send the modified copy
to? Matt?
Chris
Since no one else answered the question I'd recommend logging a ticket
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Sep 23, 2007, at 9:35 PM, Sydney Bogaert wrote:
The problem I think is that this config is found in the .tar.gz file,
the file that most people download and install as is...
Yeah, I'm thinking of rolling a 0.41 with the changes we have now.
+1
On 22-Sep-07, at 2:36 AM, Robert Spier wrote:
How is that header more useful? Please provide an example.
It's so you can do threshold filtering in your MUA (or in procmail).
Otherwise your MUA (or procmail) has to be able to understand numbers
in the headers.
Matt.
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, John L wrote:
I turned off the qmail-smtpd and added its IP to qpsmtpd, and it went nuts,
90 processes, load averages upwards of 15. I have some custom plugins, a
couple that make very cheap UDP calls, to check greylisting and to check
whether a rcpt address is valid, a
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, John L wrote:
Well, now I restarted it and the load is a reasonable 3 to 5. Must have been
a spam blast, will have to wait and see if it happens again.
I see a lot of plugins that read config files in the hook routines. Seems to
me that in forkserver, that means each
On 15-Sep-07, at 2:27 AM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
The current dnsbl plugin returns DENY if the client is in one of the
given lists, but there are some lists I trust more than others. I'd
like to see something where I can set a score right below the
threshold
for (e.g.) the geoip plugin and then
On 14-Sep-07, at 8:10 AM, John L wrote:
How/what do you return from your hook_received_line()? The first
value
should be the OK constant, the second the received line. Any other
value than OK, will ignore the results from your hook.
It's clearly returning OK. Here's what the debug log
On 14-Sep-07, at 9:36 PM, John L wrote:
Of course that only means it *should* work, not that it does...
I'll have a look when I have a bit more time.
Well, I stuck in some LOGDEBUG lines to see what was going on, at
which point it worked fine, then I commented them out, and it still
On 6-Sep-07, at 8:29 PM, Robert Spier wrote:
Some of this will be easier to fix if if let plugins register to be
run first and last.
Eeep. No. I like the strict ordering guarantees given by the config
file. The first/last stuff ends up just being a morass.
Yes, if you want that, use
On 6-Sep-07, at 11:33 AM, Johan Almqvist wrote:
My idea would be that there are only two things that can be
whitelisted: connections and transactions. On the base of what
logic, and at what stage, is up to the plugin, but if the whitelist
flag is set, any DENY* return value from subsequent
On 6-Sep-07, at 1:47 PM, Johan Almqvist wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
The way I see it is that whitelisting is basically meant as a
bypass for anti-spam filters, but not (for example) certain other
filters (like recipient checks). So I wondered if hooks should
declare themselves
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Peter Eisch wrote:
Would it be possible to implement -id as a hook? The actual key could then
be left to the creativity of the user. The plugin could then implement the
other hooks and tune the id as necessary (connect, mail, queue, etc.).
Yes, it's possible to do it
On 4-Sep-07, at 12:43 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
I was playing around a bit on the weekend, yes. Since neither Matt nor
Ask have cried out in horror on what I did,
FWIW I didn't object simply because it seems so pointless with
everyone having such conflicting ideas about what this should
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:
trunk/lib/Qpsmtpd/Connection.pm
trunk/qpsmtpd-forkserver
Log:
Connection id similar to the transaction id by Matt.
For what it's worth I really don't like this implementation - if we're
going to add in a connection id it should be
On 30-Aug-07, at 4:45 AM, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
True, but the code makes both the security guy and the programmer
in me
twitch...
Well, don't think of it for security then :-)
The part of the unique ID meant to identify the server is now
focusing on the
OS/computer instead of the
On 30-Aug-07, at 9:34 AM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 09:14 -0400, Matt Sergeant wrote:
The part of the unique ID meant to identify the server is now
Is this unique ID the transaction ID we've been discussing.
Yes.
Has someone already implemented it in svn - I thought
On 30-Aug-07, at 10:07 AM, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 the voices made Guy Hulbert write:
GH wtf does this mean - the *purpose* of the discussion is to *fix* a
GH *unique* transaction ID when the discussion is over it is
*fixed* and
GH the discussion *documents* the
On 30-Aug-07, at 2:52 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
Actually, I think the right answer is just a sequence generator (mod
1). That guarantees different consecutive results.
I think so too. In my testing perl only switches to floating point at
or around 2**50 on 32 bit platforms, which should
On 28-Aug-07, at 11:04 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
Err, actually I had a brain fart. It should be remote_port.
No, it should be remote_IP.remote_port.local_port and should
include a transaction_within_connection count. I don't think that
pid adds anything.
Please try any way you can to get
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
Then forget about the word security, and let's just say that people might
want to have unique IDs that'll be unique even when they've got more than one
server and centralized/aggregated logging... But we're not even there right
now, we are still stuck on how to make
John L wrote:
Does anyone have a plugin to interpret the CDB files that tcpserver
uses? I'm working in a mixed environment of qmail-smtpd and qpsmtpd and
it would be nice not to have to maintain two sets of rule files in
parallel.
It's not hard to write, but I'd just as soon not duplicate
On 29-Aug-07, at 1:07 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 18:15 +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
Then forget about the word security, and let's just say that
people might
want to have unique IDs that'll be unique even when they've got
more than one
server and
On 29-Aug-07, at 5:50 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
Except with multiple CPUs is a big problem. OTOH, as has been
mentioned multiple times, a four-tuple identifying the TCP
connection plus a timestamp will be satisfactory with any number of
CPUs, and with very fast networks.
pid entirely
On 29-Aug-07, at 6:03 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
That is just asserting that no single process could receive two
connections in the same tick of time() (because if it could, it's
trivial to arrange for them to have the same remote port). I can
conceive of that happening, so we should do
On 29-Aug-07, at 6:38 PM, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
MS I've added in a basic hashed version of hostname now.
Would this be a bad time to mention that people might get the idea
that they
want to run two different setups of qpsmtpd
On 29-Aug-07, at 7:02 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
On 8/29/07, Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29-Aug-07, at 5:50 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
Except with multiple CPUs is a big problem. OTOH, as has been
mentioned multiple times, a four-tuple identifying the TCP
connection plus
I've checked in $transaction-id support now. Please let me know if
you think it's OK.
Matt.
On 28-Aug-07, at 3:12 PM, JT Moree wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
I've checked in $transaction-id support now. Please let me know
if you
think it's OK.
which method did you use?
hires_time.pid.local_port
Matt.
On 28-Aug-07, at 3:51 PM, JT Moree wrote:
I found the svn web interface:
# generate id
my $conn = $args{connection};
my $ip = $conn-local_port || 0;
my $start = time;
my $id = $start.$$.$ip;
Some people have suggested adding the remote IP address. I'm curious
why use local port
On 24-Aug-07, at 6:40 PM, David Sparks wrote:
I'm using the poll server which means that there aren't threads to
worry
about. However the future probably means running multiple daemons to
take advantage of multi-core systems so there would need to be a
daemon
id encoded in there.
Yeah,
On 15-Aug-07, at 10:08 PM, John Peacock wrote:
The reason for this is that you only need to Trust forever the
server-signed
cert once, when you first configure your client to use TLS. After
that, I'm not
aware of any mail clients that even give you any feedback that you
are using a
TLS
On 16-Aug-07, at 8:32 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 18:45 -0500, Peter A Eisch wrote:
That's BS. Anyone is free to download tcpserver without any
acknowledgements. If you don't like the ucspi-tcp license you can
use
ipsvd.
snip
Check out http://pkgsrc.org/ and try and
On 14-Aug-07, at 11:21 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matt Sergeant) writes:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Apache has been running with
$self-autoflush(0);
added to Qpsmtpd::Postfix::open_cleanup()
with no ill effects for a year or two now,
and it has IME had
On 15-Aug-07, at 11:58 AM, Jim Murray wrote:
Is anyone aware of a plugin for qpsmtpd which duplicates the
functionality of Inter7's qmail-tap patch for 'stock' qmail
(http://inter7.com/index.php?page=qmailtap)?
Is it possible to do this with a qpsmtpd plugin?
Yup. See my article (linked from
On 15-Aug-07, at 5:35 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
But be careful - the 0.40 preforkserver version has MANY MANY
BUGS!!! We tried to use it for about 500 servers with over 10 000
connections / 10 minutes - and it wasn't useable at all.
We've now changed many lines - in the code and it works
On 15-Aug-07, at 5:39 PM, Ed McLain wrote:
I'm all for any changes you have. I found most, I think, of the
issues on
our beta system had to do with some of the plugins, not sure
though.. If you
have any patches though I'd be open to trying to them out. I gotta do
something. We currently
On 15-Aug-07, at 7:08 PM, Ed McLain wrote:
IS there any documentation anywhere on how and what needs to be
changed?
I've looked on the wiki and don't see anything on there about it.
As an
aside, I'll dig through the dnsbl plugin for async and see what I
can come
up with. Any information
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
I just did a write-up about my experiences here:
http://brad.livejournal.com/2336579.html
Cool. We need more users and you're just the sort of PR we need.
In a nutshell, I wrote two to-be-released modules (Mail::ZombieDetector
and
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Apache has been running with
$self-autoflush(0);
added to Qpsmtpd::Postfix::open_cleanup()
with no ill effects for a year or two now,
and it has IME had a noticable impact
on performance for queueing large emails.
Any reason not to add it to qpsmtpd
On 11-Aug-07, at 9:19 AM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 08:29 +0200, Hanno Hecker wrote:
+while (my $size = $fh-read(my $line, 4096)) {
Is 4096 the file system block size ? Not every file system uses 4k
though it is a common default. I suspect that using the exact
value
On 10-Aug-07, at 2:59 PM, John Peacock wrote:
John Peacock wrote:
The above mentioned company is based 30 minutes from my house and
is advertising for a developer position. Does anyone have actual
experience with them as a company (or employer)?
Just to follow up on this thread; I have
On 10-Aug-07, at 9:13 PM, Brian Szymanski wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas for dealing with a DDOS?
[snip]
We're currently using forkserver - is it possible that we'd have
better
luck with Apache::Qpsmtpd or pollserver?
Yes :-)
Either would be better for dealing with the load. What's
On 2-Aug-07, at 10:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qpsmtpd 0.32 forkserver
$subject = $transaction-header-get( 'Subject' ) || '' ;
This only pulls the first line of a multi-line Subject header. Is
this a bug or can I obtain the entire subject line?
What is a multi-line
On 2-Aug-07, at 11:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my test module, I put the following in after reading
the subject line as noted:
$self-log( 2, SUBJECT:$subject ) ;
All I get is the first line without any continuation (on the same
line or a new line).
I've also
On 18-Jul-07, at 5:37 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem when sending msg with many recipients:
...
I agree that the log produced by queue::smtp_forward could be a
bit more verbose...
IMO the smtp forward plugin should be rewritten to relay the
Looking at our accumulated stats for our spamtrap:
Max concurrency was 5.6k connections in EST state.
Average mails/sec was ~100, peaking to ~200.
Pretty amazing what this bit of perl can do. (and yes this is all
running stock 0.40 -async code).
On 14-Jul-07, at 9:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently using qpsmtpd 0.32 in forkserver mode.
I would like to know if it is possible for a plugin to determine which
port a connection came in on, so that it could be treated differently
from connections on other ports.
On 6-Jul-07, at 2:21 PM, John Peacock wrote:
The above mentioned company is based 30 minutes from my house and
is advertising for a developer position. Does anyone have actual
experience with them as a company (or employer)?
Yes, it's OmniTI - George and Theo Schlossnagle who many on this
Using gearman, that's how.
http://www.danga.com/gearman/
Example plugin:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use Gearman::Client::Async;
use Storable qw(thaw);
sub register {
my ($self, $qp, @args) = @_;
my @gearmen = $qp-config('gearmand_hosts');
if ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) {
$gearmen[0] =
On 28-Jun-07, at 5:44 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 13:19, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Using gearman, that's how.
Didn't we talk about this before? Maybe just in my head.
Yep.
We should have a generic gearman plugin configured something like
gearman real_plugin
mark warren bracher wrote:
any thoughts? since it's the same config and the same process listening
on multiple network interfaces, I'm a bit stumped about why it behaves
differently on one than it does on the others..
The core check_early_talker will make it hang forever probably. Make
Guy Hulbert wrote:
To be fair, in general a parser written in lex/yacc will usually be an
order of magnitude faster than the same parser written in perl with regexp.
Always that much? I realize that a lex/yacc parser will be more
efficient but I thought perl's regex engine was pretty fast.
Charlie Brady wrote:
I don't think a lex/yacc parser will necessarily parse faster than a
perl parser, so I don't think that GB of logfiles would justify writing
a parser in C. Frequent executation of a parser OTOH might. A perl
parser will very likely be slower to start up, but might execute
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lo,
I did offer to write a file upload. Well, I haven't as yet...
Mainly because I have no clue about Danga. Would a mod to the
parse_post_params work ie have the danga stuff carefully hidden
from me or will one of the project coders have to hack at it?
You certainly
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, David Favor wrote:
1) async appears to start correctly and work correctly
when no -j given
OK.
2) when starting async incorrectly senses how Danga::Socket
will poll, which should access Danga::Socket-method()
Yup. That's minor, but easily fixed. It doesn't affect
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:42, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Get it while it's fresh from http://smtpd.develooper.com/get.html :-)
I've just updated the RPMs.
Excellent.
Unless Matt, John or Robert disagrees then I think we should link to
them from the above URLs (and maybe
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 9:09, Matt Sergeant wrote:
I've updated the Changes file now. We should be ready to go.
Ask: can you tag 0.33 and do a release?
I liked the suggestion of calling it 0.40 - so I tagged it as 0.40rc1
Unless something comes up I will tag and push
Congrats to all. This should be a great release (I really should upgrade!).
David Favor wrote:
If the -j option is supplied, then CNTL-C leaves all processes
running. With no -j supplied, CNTL-C seems to shutdown the single
process correctly.
I thought you couldn't get it started? ;-)
What OS and Perl version are you on?
Martijn wrote:
Okay, that makes sense. But still, I'd like Apache and mod_perl to do
all the other things -serving images, pdfs, taking care of
authentication etc.- they have been doing so nicely for me all this
time. But I am kind of confused about where to start. Or, since I
would like to keep
Darren Griffith wrote:
In the following logs, we have:
(1) our customer: tbmailer.triobet.com [83.218.12.49] on thread 16846
(2) a spammer: OL12-45.fibertel.com.ar [24.232.45.12] on thread 16845
The spammer's server triggers the check_earlytalker plugin. Then it
triggers
the dnsbl plugin
I've updated the Changes file now. We should be ready to go.
Ask: can you tag 0.33 and do a release?
I've updated the Changes file now. We should be ready to go.
Ask: can you tag 0.33 and we'll do a release?
We should put together a plan for the next release so that it's less ad-hoc.
__
This email has been scanned by the
On 31-May-07, at 9:27 AM, Bill Jones wrote:
On 5/30/07, Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:08 -0400, Bill Jones wrote:
The other issue I see is that the cpan link indicates that
Apache::Qpsmtpd is no longer available...
Or maybe I'm missing something?
It's
On 31-May-07, at 4:47 PM, JT Moree wrote:
The amount of work to be done to make qpsmtpd deliver properly to
local
and remote users may be more than it's worth?
Not particularly... You've already got the info as to whether it's to
be relayed or not (though I guess you need to check whether
On 29-May-07, at 8:20 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
What does that spell? Release! :)
Yeah I think we just need to update Changes (it's gonna be a long one!)
JT Moree wrote:
I thought I was reading a post the other day that discussed something
like this. Searching now is getting me nowhere.
What are the possibilities that qpsmtpd could be the only MTA on a
system? It would need to handle
* incoming mail
* local mail forwarded to MDA
* Internet
On 27-May-07, at 4:24 PM, Duncan Findlay wrote:
The version of re2c currently in Debian is 0.9.x, and according to the
sa-compile man page, 0.10.x is needed for the Rule2XSBody plugin. As
far as I can tell, sa-compile is working fine with 0.9.x. Anybody know
the reason behind recommending
On 25-May-07, at 11:11 PM, S. Woodside wrote:
Anyone else running on OS X?
It's developed on OS X :-)
But I'm running XML::LibXML 1.59. I don't really trust macports...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 25-May-07, at 5:21 AM, Robin Bowes wrote:
1. Is the register sub still required these days?
Nope. But in this example yes because it registers two hooks to the
same sub.
2. What's the auth equivalent to relay_client()? e.g.
$self-qp-connection-authenticated() ??
You don't need to
On 23-May-07, at 7:57 AM, Lars Skjærlund wrote:
How do I make the XSLT engine fetch it's files from Ax2 like it did in
Ax1?
Ah I see...
Yeah, so one of the decisions I made for Ax2 was that all this stuff
in AxKit1 was too horribly fragile and broke too much, so I just
didn't implement
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars,
I had created an Ax1 module that could extract the 'content.xml' from
an OpenDocument .odt file - which is really just a zip-file wrapper
around a collection of datafiles. It worked so well that I could call
the document() function in an XSLT stylesheet, passing
See my O'Reilly article.
On 20-May-07, at 1:07 PM, Isamar Maia wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am looking for a qpsmtpd plugin to forward to me any mail sent
out by
a specific user.
Thanks in advance for any indication.
Isamar
On 17-May-07, at 6:27 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On May 17, 2007, at 15:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+my $has_ipv6 = Qpsmtpd::TcpServer::has_ipv6;
Does that work with the Apache and the async server?
Sort of :-)
It works in the sense that all has_ipv6() does is check the perl IPv6
On 26-Mar-07, at 12:18 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
I would like to propose that we create 'config.tests' and change the
code in t/Test/Qpsmptd.pm from:
sub config_dir {
'./config.sample';
}
to:
sub config_dir {
'./config.tests';
}
I'm
On 17-May-07, at 6:10 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On May 17, 2007, at 14:45, Robert Spier wrote:
Sure, lets just tag it and call it a release :)
I want to update the Changes file ... I'll try to work on it this
weekend.
I'll see if I can get that done tonight/tomorrow.
In the meantime
On 8-May-07, at 8:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. But I've just d/l it with the same result. It's probably a packet
size problem
as per my last problem
OK, fixed in svn.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
201 - 300 of 3010 matches
Mail list logo
