[framework-issues] [Issue 113104] Freshly built OOo would n ot start-up: X-errors

2010-07-15 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113104 --- Additional comments from pa...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 15 16:21:21 + 2010 --- The user tried disabling Oxygen, as well as quiting the compiz and cairo-dock

[framework-issues] [Issue 113104] Freshly built OOo would n ot start-up: X-errors

2010-07-15 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113104 --- Additional comments from pa...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 15 23:02:54 + 2010 --- Ok, I'm somewhat happy to report, that rebuilding without KDE4 solved the

[framework-issues] [Issue 113104] Freshly built OOo would n ot start-up: X-errors

2010-07-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113104 --- Additional comments from pa...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 13 14:23:39 + 2010 --- Perry's suggestion -- to use a AF_INET- rather than AF_UNIX-based DISPLAY did

[framework-issues] [Issue 113104] Freshly built OOo would n ot start-up: X-errors

2010-07-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113104 --- Additional comments from pa...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 13 14:54:44 + 2010 --- Logging in remotely I ran OOo on my screen to perform the initial registration

[tools-issues] [Issue 92932] System OpenSSL not detecte d on FreeBSD

2010-07-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92932 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 92932] System OpenSSL not detecte d on FreeBSD

2010-07-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92932 --- Additional comments from pa...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 13 17:15:30 + 2010 --- The following simple patch seems to work -- and leaves an easy way to extend

[gsl-issues] [Issue 81224] system-agg with libagg =2 .5 not supported

2010-07-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Additional comments from pa...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 13 17:26:35 + 2010 --- I'd dearly like to see this fixed. When using EXTERNAL agg, does the license

[framework-issues] [Issue 113104] Freshly built OOo would n ot start-up: X-errors

2010-07-12 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113104 --- Additional comments from pa...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 12 20:25:57 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=70578) Output of xdpyinfo on the local display.

[framework-issues] [Issue 113104] Freshly built OOo would n ot start-up: X-errors

2010-07-12 Thread panbk
Assigned to|tm Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from pa...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 12 20:25:01 + 2010 --- OOo is built via the FreeBSD port -- editors/openoffice.org-3. The GUI-framework is KDE4 (KDE-4.4.5): --with-qt-includes=/opt/include/qt4 --with-qt

[tools-issues] [Issue 93305] No way to specify external xpdf

2009-08-06 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93305 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 93266] create_services_rdb failed - CannotRegisterImplementationException

2008-12-09 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93266 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 9 18:16:38 + 2008 --- = I don't even know how I should reproduce it. Try building relying on

[tools-issues] [Issue 93305] No way to specify external xpdf

2008-09-02 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93305 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 93295] External hsqldb.jar missin g from command-line in m30

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
|none Assigned to|fs Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 31 14:23:00 + 2008 --- When building with an external hsqldb.jar (as everyone ought to, really), the JAR file is not provided in connectivity/com/sun/star/sdbcx

[installation-issues] [Issue 93266] create_services_rdb failed - CannotRegisterImplementationException

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93266 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 93266] create_services_rdb failed - CannotRegisterImplementationException

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93266 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 31 14:32:58 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=56119) Installer log log_DEV300_en-US.log

[tools-issues] [Issue 92932] System OpenSSL not detecte d on FreeBSD

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92932 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 93295] External hsqldb.jar missin g from command-line in m30

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93295 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[xml-issues] [Issue 93297] No way to specify external xmlsec

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 31 16:26:00 + 2008 --- On FreeBSD, at least, there exists a port of xmlsec (http://freshports.org/security/xmlsec1). Other systems, likely, also provide the library already. However, telling OOo

[tools-issues] [Issue 93304] Installed dmake's version not recognized with non-GNU sed

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
Subcomponent|configure Assigned to|mh Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 31 23:09:51 + 2008 --- On a non-Linux system, the already installed dmake is rejected, because configure can't figure out its version

[tools-issues] [Issue 93304] Installed dmake's version not recognized with non-GNU sed

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93304 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 93305] No way to specify external xpdf

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 31 23:28:44 + 2008 --- FreeBSD, among many other systems, already comes with a port of xpdf. Being able to use that, instead of building the version bundled with OOo would be a nice step towards

[porting-issues] [Issue 57132] Stand-alone UNO (URE) avai lable in binary format only

2008-08-31 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57132 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 31 23:32:20 + 2008 --- The sooner you do this, the better. Building the entire OOo is quite a daunting

[installation-issues] [Issue 93266] create_services_rdb failed for Ukrainian language

2008-08-29 Thread panbk
Subcomponent|code Assigned to|is Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 29 19:31:28 + 2008 --- Fri Aug 29 12:26:54 2008 (02:06 min.) dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_uk.bsd' Running processes: 0 1 module(s

[installation-issues] [Issue 93266] create_services_rdb failed for Ukrainian language

2008-08-29 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93266 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 29 19:33:15 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=56098)

[installation-issues] [Issue 93266] create_services_rdb failed for Ukrainian language

2008-08-29 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93266 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 29 19:34:32 + 2008 --- Sorry, forgot to mention, what may be important here. Lucene's JAR on my system is

[tools-issues] [Issue 92991] External JARs ignored by s wext/mediawiki build

2008-08-27 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92991 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 92991] External JARs ignored by s wext/mediawiki build

2008-08-26 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92991 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 92991] External JARs ignored by s wext/mediawiki build

2008-08-25 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92991 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 92991] External JARs ignored by s wext/mediawiki build

2008-08-21 Thread panbk
Assigned to|mh Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 21 13:23:23 + 2008 --- All of the commons-*.jar files are already present on the building system, and their locations were communicated to the configure via environment variables

[tools-issues] [Issue 92931] configure uses `==' instea d of `=' as argment for test(1)

2008-08-19 Thread panbk
Subcomponent|configure Assigned to|mh Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 20 02:16:54 + 2008 --- Configure.in and thus configure use `==' and `=' interchangeably as an argument to test. However, only the single

[tools-issues] [Issue 92931] configure uses `==' instea d of `=' as argment for test(1)

2008-08-19 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92931 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 92932] System OpenSSL not detecte d on FreeBSD

2008-08-19 Thread panbk
Assigned to|mh Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 20 02:23:58 + 2008 --- I'm sure, FreeBSD is not the only system, where OpenSSL is installed as part of the OS, but OpenSSL.pc is not present. However, currently configure only has

[tools-issues] [Issue 92932] System OpenSSL not detecte d on FreeBSD

2008-08-19 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92932 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 92933] No (obvious) way to disabl e hunspell

2008-08-19 Thread panbk
Assigned to|mh Reported by|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 20 02:28:24 + 2008 --- The only two configure-options for hunspell currently are: * use the already installed one on the system * build the one bundled with OOo There ought

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-05-02 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 07:59:20 -0700 2006 --- hr, how FreeBSD *is* building OOo is not as important as how it *should be* doing

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-05-02 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 14:10:17 -0700 2006 --- Always using what can be found on the system is nice if you think of OOo as

[porting-issues] [Issue 57132] Stand-alone UNO (URE) ava ilable in binary format only

2005-11-02 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57132 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 2 06:18:15 -0800 2005 --- I'd like to be able to build URE with (or without) the STLport of my choosing. I

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 05:40:22 -0800 2005 --- Well, yes, that is, what I'm doing -- for classes, which are only available in

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 06:04:37 -0800 2005 --- 1) I'd like to avoid using STLport because it is an extra dependency -- and a

[porting-issues] [Issue 57132] New - Stand-alone UNO (URE ) available in binary format only

2005-11-01 Thread panbk
Subcomponent:|code Assigned to:|mh Reported by:|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 07:08:29 -0800 2005 --- What is the point of making binary-only releases of LGPL software? URE-1.0.1 _binaries_ are currently available

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 09:41:54 -0800 2005 --- Well, using --without-stlport4 was not enough with the 2.0RC3, so I devised my own

[porting-issues] [Issue 56716] `-fexceptions' is needed on a lot of new files

2005-10-31 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56716] `-fexceptions' is needed on a lot of new files

2005-10-28 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 23:14:02 -0700 2005 --- Obo, dbo! The change, that added try/catch/throw to

[porting-issues] [Issue 56716] `-fexceptions' is needed on a lot of new files

2005-10-28 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56878] New - Browser plugin does not build without Java

2005-10-28 Thread panbk
:|code Assigned to:|obo Reported by:|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 07:54:28 -0700 2005 --- The functions NPN_GetJavaEnv and NPN_GetJavaPeer are, understandably, only available in the OJI case (see jmeng's extensions

[porting-issues] [Issue 56716] `-fexceptions' is needed on a lot of new files

2005-10-28 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 09:53:15 -0700 2005 --- Yes, seems to work. The fix looks a little hackish though :-) Thanks for the quick

[porting-issues] [Issue 56716] New - `-fexceptions' is ne eded on a lot of new files

2005-10-26 Thread panbk
Subcomponent:|code Assigned to:|mh Reported by:|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 07:44:28 -0700 2005 --- cppuhelper's interfacecontainer.h can now throw exceptions (since, at least m134) and so all files including it (directly

[porting-issues] [Issue 56716] `-fexceptions' is needed on a lot of new files

2005-10-26 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-26 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-26 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-26 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 07:53:16 -0700 2005 --- Kendy! One of the hunks I just attached patches the new

[porting-issues] [Issue 56546] New - ucb/source/ucp/webda v bombs WITH_SYSTEM_LIBXML

2005-10-24 Thread panbk
Subcomponent:|code Assigned to:|mh Reported by:|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 09:11:50 -0700 2005 --- The directory's makefile.mk handles the WITH_SYSTEM_NEON case, but forgets about the WITH_SYSTEM_LIBXML. This is a problem with m135

[porting-issues] [Issue 56546] ucb/source/ucp/webdav bom bs WITH_SYSTEM_LIBXML

2005-10-24 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56546 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56546] ucb/source/ucp/webdav bom bs WITH_SYSTEM_LIBXML

2005-10-24 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56546 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 09:15:23 -0700 2005 --- Oops, seems like I can not change the Assigned to field now :-( Adding kso to

[util-issues] [Issue 54479] patch to build against sy stem icu-3.4

2005-10-24 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 09:18:19 -0700 2005 --- The posted patches do not apply cleanly to m135 :-( Are there any updates?

[util-issues] [Issue 54479] patch to build against sy stem icu-3.4

2005-10-20 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 21:24:25 -0700 2005 --- OOo's own hacks to the icu-2.6 were, apparently, designed to add support for the

[util-issues] [Issue 54479] patch to build against sy stem icu-3.4

2005-10-20 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 21:34:33 -0700 2005 --- OOo's own hacks to the icu-2.6 were, apparently, designed to add support for the

[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-14 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] New - Using GCC's STL is n ot really possible without this

2005-10-13 Thread panbk
Subcomponent:|code Assigned to:|mh Reported by:|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 20:32:19 -0700 2005 --- I'm trying to use gcc-3.4.4 on FreeBSD/amd64. As there can be no ABI-compatibility issues here, I'd like to just use

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 20:48:11 -0700 2005 --- pjanik, kendy! Having upgraded to m133 and applied the following patches on top of

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-10-09 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 9 14:22:40 -0700 2005 --- The intptr-cppuhelper.diff, although an improvement, is incomplete -- it uses

[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-08 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 7 22:51:56 -0700 2005 --- Oops, the `#endif' in patch-sal is extraneous. The patch should instead read:

[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-08 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 8 06:54:49 -0700 2005 --- Wow. That's a lot of patches -- and many of them are quite old. Is there a good

[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] New - sal_Size vs. sal_Int 32

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
Assigned to:|mh Reported by:|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 7 22:24:47 -0700 2005 --- As the stuff builds, there are plenty of warnings about pointers being cast to integers of smaller size. There are a few errors however

[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55640] New - Java-1.5 can't be us ed

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
Assigned to:|mh Reported by:|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 7 22:37:15 -0700 2005 --- `assert' and `enum' are reserved words in Java-1.5. - Please do not reply

[porting-issues] [Issue 55640] Java-1.5 can't be used

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55640 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55641] New - Rhino is outdated

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
Assigned to:|mh Reported by:|panbk --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 7 22:40:58 -0700 2005 --- The version of rhino currently shipping with OOo is hopelessly out of date -- much newer versions are available from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js

[porting-issues] [Issue 55641] Rhino is outdated

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55641 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 7 22:44:00 -0700 2005 --- One more little patch for amd64-recognition: ---