To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 26 20:48:29 +
2007 ---
@mmeeks: fyi - just got this 80705 issue.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 4 10:44:14 +
2007 ---
The latest patch will be included in ooo-build as/when we pull-up to m217 (works
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 12:20:15 +
2007 ---
Can someone please update the patch to apply to src680_m217 ?
thanks in advance.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User ht990332 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User rail changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User rail changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User st changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User ace_dent changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User lho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 19 04:32:08 -0700
2006 ---
lho - so, apparently (it seems) there is a yet-newer insensitisation algorithm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 28 06:50:32 -0800
2006 ---
a week passes responselessly ... ;-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 01:02:03 -0800
2006 ---
Hi Michael. Are you sure that the most recent screen shot really is what you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 01:50:22 -0800
2006 ---
Lutz: you're quite right - turns out the file name is irrelevant in this just
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 03:57:30 -0800
2006 ---
Examining the algorithm in more detail - I notice we're missing part of the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 04:32:54 -0800
2006 ---
I attach an improved patch that tweaks the algo. a bit more to be 100% GNOME
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 07:25:59 -0800
2006 ---
added KA to Cc list
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 05:09:26 -0800
2006 ---
I support applying this patch on the basis of consistency, especially if it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 06:20:51 -0800
2006 ---
Thanks Bill; wrt to:
especially if it emulates the GTK+ code in HighContrast and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 05:50:31 -0800
2006 ---
Michael, I do not want to block this issue. In order to make a fast but well
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 06:43:18 -0800
2006 ---
So - I attach the images. Perhaps the most interesting contrasts are:
industrial
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 08:08:16 -0800
2006 ---
Michael and Tor. Thanks for the screen shots. Looking at them, I strongly object
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 09:19:25 -0800
2006 ---
They prefer gnome-industrial-old.png to gnome-industrial-new.png ? that is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 09:28:47 -0800
2006 ---
To me the patched version looks very nice; although i might add that the idea of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 09:51:34 -0800
2006 ---
Thanks Philip.
When I say it has to look like this :-) (2 comments above) I mean
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 09:45:14 -0800
2005 ---
So - any movement here - I just used an up-stream vcl cws to poke at some a11y
43 matches
Mail list logo
