To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 1 14:19:59 -0800
2005 ---
> Regarding moving the %post to the trigger script:
Not the whole %post, only the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 1 01:59:22 -0800
2005 ---
Regarding moving the %post to the trigger script: since the writer.desktop,
calc.de
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 11:01:23 -0800
2005 ---
> The splitting of the core package has been done for smaller update rpms.
Ahh, I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 03:58:28 -0800
2005 ---
The splitting of the core package has been done for smaller update rpms. I am
not s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 03:38:41 -0800
2005 ---
> Is there a way to tell rpm to use unique (sub-) directory names for building
> a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 01:27:02 -0800
2005 ---
I just noticed that the spec-file build process is not multi-build safe: Hamburg
RE
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 23:28:21 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 32863 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 7 14:49:12 -0800
2005 ---
the %postinstall of the freedesktop-menus.spec needs to be moved to the trigger
scr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 4 00:04:41 -0800
2005 ---
math.desktop was not assigned to the math module (due to a typo). Fixed now.
Thank
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 2 04:58:25 -0800
2005 ---
no involvement of my side :-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 1 22:28:10 -0800
2005 ---
The X-RedHat-Base is needed not to show up under "Other Office Applications" on
Red
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 1 09:45:38 -0800
2005 ---
Since when using unpatched epm the created packages are not marked as
relocatable,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 22:37:05 -0800
2005 ---
The point I was trying to make is that you can't be sure that you have access to
th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 14:15:56 -0800
2005 ---
"2. Adding the freedesktop rpm to epmfile is o.k., but IIRC there is a problem
with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
26 matches
Mail list logo
