[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-06-01 Thread tl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 31 23:42:41 -0700 2006 --- *** Issue 65545 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-05-03 Thread hr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 3 02:56:20 -0700 2006 --- Well, this is getting a bit out of hand, but I'll bite. It does not have to come

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-05-03 Thread hr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User hr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-05-03 Thread hr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User hr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-05-02 Thread hr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 07:41:26 -0700 2006 --- @panbk,cmc: What do we do with this patches? I do not like the renaming scheme, I

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-05-02 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 07:59:20 -0700 2006 --- hr, how FreeBSD *is* building OOo is not as important as how it *should be* doing

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-05-02 Thread hr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 08:33:19 -0700 2006 --- @panbk: Always using what can be found on the system is nice if you think of OOo

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-05-02 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 14:10:17 -0700 2006 --- Always using what can be found on the system is nice if you think of OOo as

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2006-02-06 Thread mh
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User mh changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 01:40:31 -0800 2005 --- panbk: Please, do I get it right that you are changing std:: namespace to

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 05:40:22 -0800 2005 --- Well, yes, that is, what I'm doing -- for classes, which are only available in

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 05:54:59 -0800 2005 --- Hmm, I see; but still this does not sound to me like the right thing for

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 06:04:37 -0800 2005 --- 1) I'd like to avoid using STLport because it is an extra dependency -- and a

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 08:38:24 -0800 2005 --- This should already be possible by using --without-stlport4, and the cunning

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 09:41:54 -0800 2005 --- Well, using --without-stlport4 was not enough with the 2.0RC3, so I devised my own

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-11-01 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 11:53:09 -0800 2005 --- Some tweaking might be required with the approach as its not generally in use

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-26 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-26 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-26 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 07:53:16 -0700 2005 --- Kendy! One of the hunks I just attached patches the new

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 55967] Using GCC's STL is not re ally possible without this

2005-10-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 User panbk changed the following: What|Old value |New value