To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 31 23:42:41 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 65545 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 3 02:56:20 -0700
2006 ---
Well, this is getting a bit out of hand, but I'll bite.
It does not have to come
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
User hr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
User hr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 07:41:26 -0700
2006 ---
@panbk,cmc: What do we do with this patches? I do not like the renaming scheme,
I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 07:59:20 -0700
2006 ---
hr, how FreeBSD *is* building OOo is not as important as how it *should be*
doing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 08:33:19 -0700
2006 ---
@panbk: Always using what can be found on the system is nice if you think of OOo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 14:10:17 -0700
2006 ---
Always using what can be found on the system is nice if you think of OOo
as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 01:40:31 -0800
2005 ---
panbk: Please, do I get it right that you are changing std:: namespace to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 05:40:22 -0800
2005 ---
Well, yes, that is, what I'm doing -- for classes, which are only available in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 05:54:59 -0800
2005 ---
Hmm, I see; but still this does not sound to me like the right thing for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 06:04:37 -0800
2005 ---
1) I'd like to avoid using STLport because it is an extra dependency -- and a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 08:38:24 -0800
2005 ---
This should already be possible by using --without-stlport4, and the cunning
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 09:41:54 -0800
2005 ---
Well, using --without-stlport4 was not enough with the 2.0RC3, so I devised my
own
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 11:53:09 -0800
2005 ---
Some tweaking might be required with the approach as its not generally in use
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
User panbk changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
User panbk changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 07:53:16 -0700
2005 ---
Kendy! One of the hunks I just attached patches the new
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
User panbk changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
User panbk changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
21 matches
Mail list logo