Hi,
such efects have shown up in the past for samba-shares where (AFAIR)
the estimation phase took longer then the normal timeouts in amanda
would allow. I guess at the time amanda stoped working, the E$ share
has grown over the triger line for this problem.
There was a solution a few weeks/month
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:12:10PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> Bummer.
>
> > Is it possible to configure Amanda from scratch on a seperate server and
> > use the failed servers tapes to restore data?
>
> Absolutely.
>
> There are two possible scenarios here:
[ suggestions snip
I'd like to thank all those who have helped me in my quest to get amanda
going. I have successfully backed up a file system and restored some
files. Now the bigger part begins...the rest of the network...
=G=
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:13:55PM -0400, Galen Johnson wrote:
> Ok...this is really bugging me...is the config_dir supposed to be
> compiled into amgetconf? A preliminary look at the code seems to infer
> that it is as well as config. I'm having an issue with amgetconf
> (currently) in that i
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 at 6:12pm, Jose A Medina wrote
> Im still an Amanda Rookie so please bear with my ignorange in this matter
> Our internal amanda server had its main HDD just die.
Bummer.
> Is it possible to configure Amanda from scratch on a seperate server and
> use the failed servers tap
To Anyone:
Im still an Amanda Rookie so please bear with my ignorange in this matter
Our internal amanda server had its main HDD just die.
My question:
Is it possible to configure Amanda from scratch on a seperate server and
use the failed servers tapes to restore data?
If so what would be the
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 16:36, Quinn, Richard C. - Collinsville
IT wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>I think I've narrowed it down just a spell.
>Gene was helpfull with some advice regarding the "tapedev"
> variable in amanda.conf.
>Unfortunately that didn't seem to fix the issue, which I think MAY
> be
Ok...this is really bugging me...is the config_dir supposed to be
compiled into amgetconf? A preliminary look at the code seems to infer
that it is as well as config. I'm having an issue with amgetconf
(currently) in that it expects amanda.conf to be in whatever directory
it is run from or yo
Personally, my largest source of "delete-able" mail by far is this list.
That is not a comment upon its overall value, just that most of what I get
on a daily basis does not apply to me. Typically either I do not have the
configuration being inquired about (for example, we do not use tape
changer
Please, please, please, let's take discussion of what to do about spam
on amanda-users offline.
It does nobody any good to debate dealing with spam on the list and it's
unquestionably off-topic as much as the spam itself is. If it will
make people feel better, I'll setup an unmoderated open lis
ok...I've determined that the best change script to use (for me) is
chg-zd-mtx. Now, for some reason when I try to run the chg-zd-mtx -info
I get the error ' changerfile must be specified in
amanda.conf'...now, this file is defined in my amanda.conf file
(/home/amanda/config/daily/chg-zd-mtx.
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 14:29, Galen Johnson wrote:
>woohoo...I'm actually making progress...amcheck actually completed
>mostly without errors (mainly because I stupidly left the disklist
> at the default that came with amanda...silly...silly). I also
> forgot to label my tapes (I am current
Whenever people start doing this on a list I am on (obnoxiously post
off-topic messages) I take their addresses and use them when I am required
to supply registration information on a website. Of course, I _also_
check those nasty little check boxes like "Send me email announcements and
news".
I
[ On Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 13:09:36 (-0500), Frank Smith wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Spam's a sacrific, at least there's no viruses.
>
>
> Some general observations on this and previous related threads:
>
> Amanda is free software.
> The amanda-users mailing list is free.
> Someone (not me)
[ On Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 14:04:58 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Spam's a sacrific, at least there's no viruses.
>
> Its a fact of life these days, and one sets up filtering accordingly
> using whatever facilities are available on ones own platform.
There's no reason not
woohoo...I'm actually making progress...amcheck actually completed
mostly without errors (mainly because I stupidly left the disklist at
the default that came with amanda...silly...silly). I also forgot to
label my tapes (I am currently in the process of this). Now the
question...I have a 7
Some general observations on this and previous related threads:
Amanda is free software.
The amanda-users mailing list is free.
Someone (not me) administers the list and pays for it.
When someone gets something for free, they can suggest changes to the
person(s) responsible for providing it
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 13:15, Greg A. Woods wrote:
[...]
>Spam is not a sacrifice I'm willing to make to freely help out
> other users of any free software, nor even to get free help for
> software I use.
Sorry, you just pulled this old mans trigger.
Its a fact of life these days, and one
Title: SMSTR ptwryrhwgcvhpjjihbsnerjepygoemhvieqkv
Degerli SMSTR kullanicimiz
SMS programimiz çesitli aksakliklar sebebi ile kullanilamaz hale gelmistir. Bu
sebepten dolayi yeni bir program hazirlamak zorunda kaldik. Programi asagidaki linki
kullanarak indirebilirsiniz. Programi biz virü
Let's return to discussions of amanda.
No replies, agreements, or follow-ups needed.
--
Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
We have had amanda and Samba working for about a year now. Mysteriously
a couple of weeks ago, the Samba (and local drive) backups stopped
working. I can SMBOUNT the shares fine from the amanda server, but the
backups fail. The error from the nightly report is:
newbackup. //NETALERT/E$ lev
ENOUGH ALREADY...
Take this battle off list, please.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sherohman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hi
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:08:22PM +0100, Spicer, Kevin wrote:
> One possibility is
[ On Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 10:57:41 (+0200), Trevor Fraser wrote: ]
> Subject: Spam's a sacrific, at least there's no viruses.
>
> I've read through a few mails titled "Hi", and I wanted to encourage people to be a
>little tolerent. The concept of not having to be on the list to post to
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:38:03PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 09:14:54 (-0500), Dave Sherohman wrote: ]
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:46:37PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > > I beg to differ. List servers should be no more tolerant of accepting
> > > e-mai
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:08:22PM +0100, Spicer, Kevin wrote:
> One possibility is to allow anonymous users to post through a web page, but only
>list members to post via email. If a non-member attempts to post via email they
>should recieve a polite bounce referring them to the website.
Seem
Multiple people have mentioned similar ideas: procmail and a filter.
I just set up spamassassin (http://www.spamassassin.org/) a week or so
ago and it has correctly identified all spam to this list, and almost
all spam vs. non-spam I've received on the rest of my accounts, too.
It sets up very ni
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 11:55, Brian Jonnes wrote:
>On Tue 10 Sep 02 16:32, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> Either way, one backup will be 2 days worth of activity. I
>> follow Chris' scheme -- btw it is Monday to Saturday, not M-F.
>> So I (and Chris) would collect Sat+Sun on the Monday 2AM backup.
[ On Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 16:08:22 (+0100), Spicer, Kevin wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: hi
>
> One possibility is to allow anonymous users to post through a web
> page, but only list members to post via email. If a non-member
> attempts to post via email they should recieve a polite bounce
>
[ On Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 09:14:54 (-0500), Dave Sherohman wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: hi
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:46:37PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > I beg to differ. List servers should be no more tolerant of accepting
> > e-mail from known abusers, dial-up/DSL/cable addresses,
On Tue 10 Sep 02 16:32, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> Either way, one backup will be 2 days worth of activity. I follow Chris'
> scheme -- btw it is Monday to Saturday, not M-F. So I (and Chris) would
> collect Sat+Sun on the Monday 2AM backup. Your scheme would collect
> Sun+Mon on the Tuesday backup.
One possibility is to allow anonymous users to post through a web page, but only list
members to post via email. If a non-member attempts to post via email they should
recieve a polite bounce referring them to the website.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sherohman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:25:02AM +0200, Brian Jonnes wrote:
> On Mon 09 Sep 02 22:14, Chris Bourne wrote:
> > 0 14 * * 1-6/usr/sbin/amcheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] DailySet1
> > 0 1 * * 1-6/usr/sbin/amtape DailySet1 slot next
> > 0 2 * * 0/usr/sbin/amtape DailySet1 clean
> > 0 2 * * 1-6
There is such a thing as being overly paranoid...
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:46:37PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I beg to differ. List servers should be no more tolerant of accepting
> e-mail from known abusers, dial-up/DSL/cable addresses,
ITYM "ISP DHCP pools". A static IP address is a sta
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 07:50, Mozzi wrote:
>Hi all
>
>In the doc/README I have to enter the following line in inetd.conf
>amandaidx stream tcp nowait USER AMINDEXD_PATH amindexd
>
>How will I do it for xinetd ?
>I know it is a file in xinetd.d
>looking @ the basic structure of other files th
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 03:09, Brian Jonnes wrote:
>I'm assuming it is from the head of the tape; this was an amdump.
>
>..Brian
Oh, I was thinking that report came from the winderz box, my
mistake. Flush that theory... Back to a bad drive maybe???
>On Mon 09 Sep 02 20:43, Gene Heskett w
Hi all
In the doc/README I have to enter the following line in inetd.conf
amandaidx stream tcp nowait USER AMINDEXD_PATH amindexd
How will I do it for xinetd ?
I know it is a file in xinetd.d
looking @ the basic structure of other files there
{
type= INTERNAL UNLISTED
(Posted to both lists, because it might lead to some development)
On Monday, 9. September 2002 12:31, Hauke Fath wrote:
> Am 09.09.2002 um 9:51 Uhr +0200 schrub Amon Ott:
> >I am currently investigating how to backup SAP R/3 systems on Oracle /
Linux
> >with amanda. So far I have found no refere
On Mon 09 Sep 02 22:14, Chris Bourne wrote:
> 0 14 * * 1-6/usr/sbin/amcheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] DailySet1
> 0 1 * * 1-6/usr/sbin/amtape DailySet1 slot next
> 0 2 * * 0/usr/sbin/amtape DailySet1 clean
> 0 2 * * 1-6/usr/sbin/amdump DailySet1
Just one suggestion: You are running amchec
Hello all.
I've read through a few mails titled "Hi", and I
wanted to encourage people to be a little tolerent. The concept of not
having to be on the list to post to it helps far more people all over the world
than hinders a couple of irritated subscribers.
I'm not generally an except
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:04:33PM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
>
> amverify use ammt and amdd which understand the file: driver.
> They must be installed at the same place as your amverify program.
> 'make install' do it.
>
> If amverify dont' find them, it will use the system mt and dd p
On Monday, 9. September 2002 18:00, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:10:30AM -0400, Bort, Paul wrote:
> > There is a tar-wrapper script for people who don't have GNUTar or need to
do
> > something non-tar, like dumping a database. Search the amanda-users list
> > archives for it. I
I'm assuming it is from the head of the tape; this was an amdump.
..Brian
On Mon 09 Sep 02 20:43, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 09 September 2002 12:14, Brian Jonnes wrote:
> >On Mon 09 Sep 02 14:26, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Monday 09 September 2002 02:39, Brian Jonnes wrote:
> >> >Just a b
42 matches
Mail list logo
