On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:58:16PM -0500, Nick Jones wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]#./amtapetype -f /dev/nst0 -e 400g
> amtapetype: could not open /dev/nst0: Input/output error
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]#mtx -f /dev/nst0 inquiry
> cannot open SCSI device '/dev/nst0' - Input/output error
>
> I don
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]#./amtapetype -f /dev/nst0 -e 400g
amtapetype: could not open /dev/nst0: Input/output error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]#mtx -f /dev/nst0 inquiry
cannot open SCSI device '/dev/nst0' - Input/output error
I don't have mt. I figured mtx is a suitable replacement.
Not sure if it is
--On August 21, 2006 8:22:52 PM +1000 Craig Dewick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I might be getting hold of a StorEdge L9 with a DLT-8000 in it sometime
in the next few weeks. Is anyone using one of those arrays with Amanda?
Are there any gotcha's to watch out for? Any recommendations on the
'
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 at 5:28pm, Cyrille Bollu wrote
For the record my BOT system is made of:
1) 1 Dell Poweredge 2850 with 1 1.4TB RAID5 array made of 6 U320 SCSI
HD
What RAID controller? Have you benchmarked the array itself with
something like bonnie++ or tiobench?
2) 1 Dell Power
> >
> > What they definitely need to know is which tapes are to be pulled
off.
> > All the tapes in the changer will have a bar code label. Can
I instruct
> > Amanda to send an email with which tapes have been used for a
determined
> > backup (the full weekly off-site, in this case) so that the p
Hi Jon,
thank you for your answer. But you didn't answered
the more crucial question:
"Is there something else I have
to configure or is this an intended behaviour of Amanda?"
From your answers, I believe that it is an intended
behaviour of Amanda. But I don't think it should be.
As you pr
On 2006-08-21 16:45, Fabio Corazza wrote:
I'd rather go with 3 chunks each of 400GB (at least, the first two of
400GB and the third with the remaining). Or if this does not fit well
for Amanda, I can create multiple chunks of 200GB, but not less, since
this is the size of the virtual disks on the
On 2006-08-21 17:07, Cyrille Bollu wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 21/08/2006 16:45:18 :
[ ??? owner-amanda-users ??? I believe the quoting is wrong ]
>
> But if I stick with just one big GFS fs, I think I will have just one
> DLE and then Amanda will take care to span the tar volum
Oups I forgot to mention that the backup server is
also the only client (about 1TB of data split in about 30 DLE).
Hi
I've been struggling to get an amanda client running on an unslung linksys
NSLU box (wonderful little things).
Amanda client and server versions: 2.5.0p2 (also tried2.5.1b2)
Server Solaris: 9
client details: Linux 2.4.22-xfs #1 Thu Feb 3 22:51:32 CST
2005 armv5b unknown unknown GNU/Linux
un
Hi all,
I would like to proceed with my thread about server
tuning for BOT performance.
The goal is to summarize in one place what I did,
I'm doing, and will do, to improve my BOT system performance in the hope
that it will helps others one day.
Tape drives are becoming faster than ever (even f
[Sorry if this is a double; my initial one was sent from a non-list address.]
Hi, all -- I've got a bunch of virtual tapes that work in a round-robbin
fashion, and they're filling up to 100%. So, a few questions:
- Shouldn't Amanda be "smart" enough not to fill them (assuming filesizes
don't cha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 21/08/2006
16:45:18 :
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> [snip]
> > If go with amanda you definitely should do that GFS filesystem
as
> > multiple DLEs. If I got your data size correct, you have
about
> > 1 TB of GFS data plus 0.4 TB of misc OS data, about 1.4TB total.
>
> Thi
Jon LaBadie wrote:
[snip]
> If go with amanda you definitely should do that GFS filesystem as
> multiple DLEs. If I got your data size correct, you have about
> 1 TB of GFS data plus 0.4 TB of misc OS data, about 1.4TB total.
This in the case I will decide to split the actual filesystem into more
On Monday 21 August 2006 13:42, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> David,
>
> Could you try the attached patch? It should fix the driver crash.
Thanks! Think it has indeed fixed it: Have only managed to test one combo
(still got the performance+indexing issue, of course), but
a run with DLEs 2/2 :: w
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:23:13AM +0200, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
>
> >On 2006-08-21 09:48, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
> >> $ /usr/local/sbin/amcheck DailySet1
> >> Amanda Tape Server Host Check
> >> -
> >> WARNING: program /usr/local/libexec/planner: not setuid-
Kristian Rink wrote:
Hello all;
after getting last weeks issues fixed, downgrading amanda
(now 2.5.0-20060424) as well as tar (now 1.14-2.2), Thursday and Friday
incremental dumps worked out. However, weekend dump once again didn't
to as it is supposed to. I had an eye on the amanda processes al
David,
Could you try the attached patch?
It should fix the driver crash.
Jean-Louis
David Golden wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 16:18, David Golden wrote:
so switched nearly-2.5.1 to vanilla "bsd" with holding disk in order to
try another test with nearly-2.5.1 to try to eliminate tha
Hello all;
after getting last weeks issues fixed, downgrading amanda
(now 2.5.0-20060424) as well as tar (now 1.14-2.2), Thursday and Friday
incremental dumps worked out. However, weekend dump once again didn't
to as it is supposed to. I had an eye on the amanda processes all the
weekend and it _
On 2006-08-21 13:40, Natalia García Nebot wrote:
Ok! I've ignored the message from amcheck but when i try to execute su
amanda -c "amdump DiariaPrueba" in the directory /var/log/amanda i have
two debug files. I have a error message here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] amanda]# cat sendbackup.20060821132521
On 2006-08-21 12:58, Natalia García Nebot wrote:
Hi all! when i execute "su amanda -c "amcheck DiariaPrueba" i get this
message:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: aroprod: [could not access /home/natalia (/home/natalia):
Permission denied]
C
Hi all! when i execute "su amanda -c "amcheck DiariaPrueba" i get this
message:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: aroprod: [could not access /home/natalia (/home/natalia):
Permission denied]
Client check: 1 host checked in 10.011 seconds, 1 p
I might be getting hold of a StorEdge L9 with a DLT-8000 in it sometime in
the next few weeks. Is anyone using one of those arrays with Amanda? Are
there any gotcha's to watch out for? Any recommendations on the
'interfacing' software to go between Amanda and the array? Is 'mtx' still
the app
>On 2006-08-21 11:23, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
>>
>>> On 2006-08-21 09:48, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
$ /usr/local/sbin/amcheck DailySet1 Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
WARNING: program /usr/local/libexec/planner: not setuid-root
WARNING: p
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2006-08-21 11:23, David S�nchez Mart�n wrote:
> > The programs on cygwin shell seem correctly setuid to root (the user i've
> > created).
> >
> > Maybe is a permissions problem but i tried to change owner to SYSTEM
> > (Windows best equivalent to God..
On 2006-08-21 11:23, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
On 2006-08-21 09:48, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
$ /usr/local/sbin/amcheck DailySet1
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
WARNING: program /usr/local/libexec/planner: not setuid-root
WARNING: program /usr/local/libexec/du
>On 2006-08-21 09:48, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
>> $ /usr/local/sbin/amcheck DailySet1
>> Amanda Tape Server Host Check
>> -
>> WARNING: program /usr/local/libexec/planner: not setuid-root
>> WARNING: program /usr/local/libexec/dumper: not setuid-root
>> WARNING: pr
On 2006-08-21 10:03, Natalia García Nebot wrote:
Hi all! I have a doubt: Is it possible run a daemon for amanda (amandad)
on client instead of inetd or xinetd?
No, amandad relies on an external program to do that. In all the
Unix-variants I know there is at least inetd or xinetd provided.
J
On 2006-08-21 09:48, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
$ /usr/local/sbin/amcheck DailySet1
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
WARNING: program /usr/local/libexec/planner: not setuid-root
WARNING: program /usr/local/libexec/dumper: not setuid-root
WARNING: program /usr/local/sb
Hi all! I have a doubt: Is it possible run a daemon for amanda (amandad)
on client instead of inetd or xinetd?
Hi list:
I'm pretty new to amanda, but i'll try to explain myself :-)
I am trying to use amanda for backups using a Windows host for backups
(just to disk, no tape dev.)
I succesfully (aparently) compiled amanda server following the instructions
on: http://www.amanda.org/docs/howto-cygwin.ht
> /-- server2.localdomain /usr lev 0 STRANGE
> sendbackup: start [server2.localdomain:/usr level
0]
> sendbackup: info BACKUP=/sbin/dump
> sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/sbin/restore -f...
-
> sendbackup: info end
> ? device-mapper: version ioctl failed: Permission
denied
> | DUMP: Date of this
32 matches
Mail list logo