Re: Permission problems with LVM

2005-01-21 Thread Hans van Zijst
Hi Gene, Gene Heskett wrote: First, the normal amanda install is to configure and make it as an unpriviledged user, like 'amanda'. This user 'amanda' should be made a member of the group 'disk' or some similar high ranking operator. When that make is done, then become root to do the install,

Re: Permission problems with LVM

2005-01-21 Thread Hans van Zijst
Hi Paul, Paul Bijnens wrote: I believe, LVM2, or lvm special files has nothing to do with using gnutar to backup. (The other way around: using dump with a non accessible lvm-special file would be a problem.) And gnutar actually *does* run with root-priviledges, at least, if installed correctly

Re: Permission problems with LVM

2005-01-21 Thread Hans van Zijst
Hmm, that messages wasn't supposed to be sent yet... Hans van Zijst wrote: I did, months ago. So it should be using the setuid runtar binary, but still it can't read stuff. Maybe the problem arises in an earlier stage, before the actual backup is done. When I run amcheck, it complains it can't

Permission problems with LVM

2005-01-19 Thread Hans van Zijst
Hi, After having spent several hours in vain searching the Internet for a hint, I hope someone here can help. I know it's not an Amanda specific problem, but I hope someone here has run into the same problem... I've used Amanda without problems for quite some time. Most machines here run LVM1

Re: Tape shouldn't be active anymore, but is.

2004-05-18 Thread Hans van Zijst
On Monday 17 May 2004 19:16, Alexander Jolk wrote: Hans van Zijst wrote: I don't seem to understand how to tell Amanda when to overwrite tapes. What I try to do is make regular backups from monday till thursday (I make a full dump every friday) and recycle those tapes after 2 weeks. So, I

Tape shouldn't be active anymore, but is.

2004-05-17 Thread Hans van Zijst
I don't seem to understand how to tell Amanda when to overwrite tapes. What I try to do is make regular backups from monday till thursday (I make a full dump every friday) and recycle those tapes after 2 weeks. So, I use 4 tapes every week and one cycle takes 2 weeks, which means I use 8 tapes

Tape shouldn't be active anymore, but is.

2004-05-17 Thread Hans van Zijst
I don't seem to understand how to tell Amanda when to overwrite tapes. What I try to do is make regular backups from monday till thursday (I make a full dump every friday) and recycle those tapes after 2 weeks. So, I use 4 tapes every week and one cycle takes 2 weeks, which means I use 8 tapes

Re: Help: could not connect to HOST

2004-05-05 Thread Hans van Zijst
and of the server, but no success. All my machines are powered by Slackware. Can you help me? Thanks, Armando Em Ter, 2004-05-04 às 08:05, Hans van Zijst escreveu: Hi Armando, Could be several things. First, are you sure your clients have amandad running? Check your inetd or xinetd

Re: Help: could not connect to HOST

2004-05-04 Thread Hans van Zijst
Hi Armando, Could be several things. First, are you sure your clients have amandad running? Check your inetd or xinetd configuration and test by telnetting to port 10080. If you can connect, amandad is running. If amandad is running and you still can't connect, there's probably a firewall

Re: newbie questions

2004-04-27 Thread Hans van Zijst
Hi Mogorva, First off, I'm not an Amanda expert either, so maybe I'm talking rubbish here. If so, I'm sure someone will correct me :) AFAIK you can't use the same tape for several consecutive backup sessions. Amanda uses its dumpcycle parameter to decide how long it will refuse to overwrite a

Incremental tape too low when using amrestore

2004-04-21 Thread Hans van Zijst
I tried a bare metal recovery yesterday, but without the success I had hoped for. I restored the latest level 0 dump and then tried to restore the incremental dump over it. First step worked like a charm, but as soon as I restored the incremental tape, I got the error: restore: Incremental

Re: Incremental tape too low when using amrestore

2004-04-21 Thread Hans van Zijst
: Hello Hans, As quoted from Hans van Zijst [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I tried a bare metal recovery yesterday, Why didn't you just use amrecover? It prompts you to insert the right tapes in the tape server as needed, without you having to figure it out yourself. Kind regards

Re: Incremental tape too low when using amrestore

2004-04-21 Thread Hans van Zijst
Paul, Every machine here runs Amanda 2.4.4p2. I'm sure the tapes that amadmin lists, are the correct ones: Dagtape-04 was made last thursday and on fridays I make a full dump, using another configuration. This monday and tuesday I went on with Dagelijks. I got exactly the same message

Re: Incremental tape too low when using amrestore

2004-04-21 Thread Hans van Zijst
, and there are no restoresymtables on it anywhere. Thanks for your help so far. Kind regards, Hans van Zijst On Wednesday 21 April 2004 14:06, Paul Bijnens wrote: AFAIK, this wouldn't have the effect of the message Incremental dump too low. Because dump dumps the diskblocks themselves

Tapesize

2004-04-09 Thread Hans van Zijst
It seems as if Amanda has a problem with my DLT drive. It's an HP DLT7000, an uncompressed tape has a capacity of 35GB, a compressed one up to 70GB. But when I do a full dump of all my machines on a time that one of them contains quite a lot of data (my own homegrown backup-images), I get this

Re: Amanda vs firewall

2004-03-23 Thread Hans van Zijst
On Monday 22 March 2004 18:56, Frank Smith wrote: Besides the --with-tcpportrange= option, you probably also need the --with-udpportrange= option as well, and open those udp ports on the firewall. See PORTS.USAGE in the docs directory. Thanks. I don't know exactly what my colleague changed

Amanda vs firewall

2004-03-22 Thread Hans van Zijst
I need some help configuring Amanda to backup a couple of hosts in our DMZ. Been trying to get it to work for quite some time, but it just won't work. Hosts in the trusted zone go like a charm, but no success on the DMZ hosts so far. For some reason our firewall doesn't seem to like Amanda,