Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-03 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: I picked a 'virtual' tape size to match the capacity of a DVD-R: 4.3Gig, with the idea of migrating the fulls and the more major incrs to DVD-Rs for long-term archival. Ah! You should take a look at both the dvdrw device

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-03 Thread Robert Heller
At Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:11:57 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: I picked a 'virtual' tape size to match the capacity of a DVD-R: 4.3Gig, with the idea of migrating the fulls and the more major incrs to

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-03 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: Also I am pretty much stuck with 2.5.0, since that is what comes with CentOS... (I don't at this point want to 'experiment' with a bleeding edge self-built package, not for something like this.) Yikes, you may be *very*

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-03 Thread Robert Heller
At Sun, 3 Oct 2010 11:37:25 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: Also I am pretty much stuck with 2.5.0, since that is what comes with CentOS... (I don't at this point want to 'experiment' with a

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-03 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: One of the downsides of using a very *stable* Linux distro with long term stable support.  OTOH, it avoids the fun of re-installing everything every 6-12 months and then spending a couple of months getting all of the

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-03 Thread Robert Heller
At Sun, 3 Oct 2010 14:19:50 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: One of the downsides of using a very *stable* Linux distro with long term stable support.  OTOH, it avoids the fun of re-installing

Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Heller
Why does Amanda do multiple level 0 backups? I only want 1 (and only 1) level 0 backup (of any given disk) in the backup cycle (4 weeks / 28 days). The documentation for the bump* parameters is not clear (to me). I want Amanda to aggressively bump dump levels. I don't have enough virtual tapes

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:05:44AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: Why does Amanda do multiple level 0 backups? I only want 1 (and only 1) level 0 backup (of any given disk) in the backup cycle (4 weeks / 28 days). The documentation for the bump* parameters is not clear (to me). I want Amanda

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:15:29 -0400 amanda-users@amanda.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:05:44AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: Why does Amanda do multiple level 0 backups? I only want 1 (and only 1) level 0 backup (of any given disk) in the backup cycle (4 weeks / 28 days). The

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote: runtapes 2 # number of tapes to be used in a single run of amdump I hope very few dumps take more than one tape, like none :) To be clear on the planner's reasoning: it considers itself to have runtapes * tapetype:length kb

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:59:38 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote: runtapes 2 # number of tapes to be used in a single run of amdump I hope very few dumps take more than one tape, like none :) To be clear

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: So I would be better off setting runtapes to 1?  And then manually 'flushing' at the beginning of the cycle to deal with the larger fulls? Arg... This sort of thing is not really well explained in the man pages...

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:06:17 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: So I would be better off setting runtapes to 1?  And then manually 'flushing' at the beginning of the cycle to deal with the larger

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
Robert, I had another thought. You could set all your DLEs to be set to do incremental only. I forget whether this is strategy nofull or strategy incronly or ???. With this you may be able to set you runtapes to 1 and maybe use a larger tape size as you would not be archiving them to DVDs. You