Matt Juszczak wrote:
lookup_ldap: 3861 (51%) (4 seconds) I personally don't use LDAP so I
have no idea how to improve this, or if this is as good as it gets.
But this is obviously where amavisd-new spends half its time.
Ahhh ... so we need a better pool of LDAP servers. Yeah, our LDAP
Gary,
Razor2 for use with amavisd-new. Mini HOWTO
Thanks, nice.
One general remark: it is better if the not-to-be-mucked-with files
such as razor-agent.conf are not owned by (nor live in a directory
owned by) vscan, just in case. It is safer to have them owned by root
and let them live perhaps
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:41:02AM +0200, Paolo Cravero as2594 wrote:
snip
I also hacked into amavisd script and commented out unnecessary LDAP
queries, that we will not need. I am now only checking for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Lines involved are 2207
to 2228 in my 2.3.1.
Chris,
even though the score is way up there.. not sure why
this is getting thru..
Check the logs. Perhaps recipient was declared spam_lover.
Are you showing a spam admin notification, or the output
of a separate spamassassin run? If the later, see
To save some SpamAssassin processing, and further differentiate these two
groups, I believe you could use the same table to also bypass spam checks:
@bypass_spam_checks_maps = ( read_hash($MYHOME/spam_lovers) );
True.
Even better is to have the @bypass_spam_checks_maps be the SAME list
(not
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:56:56AM +0200, Mark Martinec told us:
If I knew how much confusion the semantics of bypass_* vs. *_lovers
is causing, I would have provide only _lovers, and derive bypass_
automatically from it. Perhaps some day...
what if on a big mail server hosting
i no longer recieve an email notirying me
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects
Mark wrote:
Gary,
Razor2 for use with amavisd-new. Mini HOWTO
Thanks, nice.
One general remark: it is better if the not-to-be-mucked-with files
such as razor-agent.conf are not owned by (nor live in a directory
owned by) vscan, just in case. It is safer to have them owned by root
and
Paolo Cravero as2594 wrote:
Matt Juszczak wrote:
lookup_ldap: 3861 (51%) (4 seconds) I personally don't use LDAP so I
have no idea how to improve this, or if this is as good as it gets.
But this is obviously where amavisd-new spends half its time.
Ahhh ... so we need a better pool of LDAP
The amavisd-new-2.3.3 release is getting near.
Please find a pre-release at:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.3.3-pre2.tar.gz
The version 2.3.3 is a maintenance release over 2.3.2.
It fixes known problems and provides some optimizations,
especially in processing of the more
We have all virus notifications turned off ($warn* = 0). We have a
single client that wants to receive notifications when he has been sent
a virus. Is there a way to notify the recipient only if the recipient
is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIA
Dan Horne
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:12:44PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
You might try to make better indexes on the LDAP server before
upgrading the hardware.
Paul,
Yep, tried this yesterday :) that was the problem. Added another index
for mailRoutingAddress (I already had mailLocalAddress
Mark wrote:
The amavisd-new-2.3.3 release is getting near.
Please find a pre-release at:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.3.3-pre2.tar.gz
Requires Compress::Zlib version 1.35 or greater. Debian
libcompress-zlib-perl is still at 1.34, looks like I'll have to go
the CPAN
Gary,
# amavisd-new debug-sa
$myhostname must be a FQDN, please set it explicitly: sfm at
/usr/sbin/amavisd-new line 8992.
Since many (who upgrade and do not read RELEASE_NOTES) may get
this error, would it be good to tell them to set it in amavisd.conf?
Maybe something like:
Unable to
boricua wrote:
i no longer recieve an email notirying me
i meant notifying me of quarentine spam/virus
Maybe no one has sent you a virus or banned file today.
For virus and banned files, make sure you still have:
$virus_admin = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; # notifications recip.
Looking at a copy of
boricua wrote:
i can't believe the email below had 0 points?
if it finds a bad header chk does it skip spam/virus chk?
if so can i modify the order of chks
Spam checks are performed before header checks.
The logic is currently hard-wired into the program and can not be
influenced by
16 matches
Mail list logo
