Hello,
I'm using Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL as my Mail Gateway platform.
I would like to disable spam and virus scan for but internal-to-internal
messages.
At the moment, I have the following setup:
$inet_socket_port = [10026];
$interface_policy{'10026'} = 'SENDERBYPASS';
$policy_bank{'SENDERB
Hello,
I have a number of networks from which it is possible to use my mail
gateway system (Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL) to relay email messages
(directly through a mail client or through another MTA that uses my mail
gateway system as smart host). The mail gateway system moreover is used
as MX reco
> > Hello,
>
> Use your mta. Just post to postfix list.
Thanks anyway,
but if read my email carefully, I can notice that I have already post my
question to the postfix list too..
:-)
rocsca
--
Open Source Business Co
Hello,
I have a number of networks from which is possible to use my mail
gateway system (Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL) to relay email messages
(directly through a mail client or through another MTA that uses my mail
gateway system as smart host). The mail gateway system moreover is used
as MX record
Infact,
>> I'm currentry using @lookup_sql_dsn for storing quarantine in DB.
>>
>> So I have tried to include both DSN in @lookup_sql_dsn array:
>>
>> @lookup_sql_dsn =
>> (
>> ['DBI:mysql:database=amavis;host=127.0.0.1;port=3306',
>> 'user1', 'apss1'],
>> ['DBI:mysql:database=postfix;ho
Hello,
> I need just one more clarification..
>
> > > (Is it right to unset "bypass_virus_checks_maps"?)
> > >
> > > Then I have added the following config line:
> > >
> > > @lookup_sql_dsn =
> > >( ['DBI:mysql:database=mail;host=127.0.0.1;port=3306', 'user',
> > > 'password'],);
> > > @stor
Mark,
I need just one more clarification..
> > (Is it right to unset "bypass_virus_checks_maps"?)
> >
> > Then I have added the following config line:
> >
> > @lookup_sql_dsn =
> >( ['DBI:mysql:database=mail;host=127.0.0.1;port=3306', 'user',
> > 'password'],);
> > @storage_sql_dsn = @lookup_
Mark,
> > I have assumed that I have I have to take away the
> > "bypass_virus_check_maps" setting from the policy below:
> >
> > $inet_socket_port = [10024,10026];
> >
> > $interface_policy{'10026'} = 'SENDERBYPASS';
> >
> > $policy_bank{'SENDERBYPASS'} = {
> > originating => 1,
> >
Mark,
First of all thank you for you great insight about the argument..
> > One thing that I can do after I have separated traffic originating
> > inside my network, from the other traffic passing through my mail
> > gateway, is to stop to analyse that traffic agaist viruses.
> >
> > Indeed, I th
Hello.
I would like to implement a policy that let to pass trough my mail
gateway all DSN destined to the domain 'domain.tld' managed by me.
I'm pretty sure on how to capture email destined to 'domain.tld' and
bypass soam and virus cheching.
Anyway is hard for me to infer how to catch DSN. I fee
> To preserve compatibility, an implied initialization is:
> $sql_clause{'sel_policy'} = \$sql_select_policy;
> so either set the $sql_select_policy (which will be passed on to
> $sql_clause{'sel_policy'} ), or assign to $sql_clause{'sel_policy'}
> directly and ignore $sql_select_policy.
>
> The
> A better approach would probably be to use SQL lookup instead of a
> statical hash-based lookup. The policy.bypass_virus_checks SQL field
> is equivanent to @bypass_virus_checks_maps (actually it's the other
> way around, the SQL lookup table is implicitly prepended to a
> lists of lookup tables
> > >> originating recip. is local
> > >> 0 0can't happen (open
relay)
> > >> 0 1inbound
> > >> 1 0outbound
> > >> 1 1internal-to-internal
> > >>
Mark,
> >> originating recip. is local
> >> 0 0can't happen (open relay)
> >> 0 1inbound
> >> 1 0outbound
> >> 1 1internal-to-internal
> >>
> >>
>> originating recip. is local
>> 0 0can't happen (open relay)
>> 0 1inbound
>> 1 0outbound
>> 1 1internal-to-internal
>>
>> # a global setting
>> smtpd_client_restrictions =
>> check_client_access
>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-check-client-filter-access.cf
>> ->check_recipient_access
>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-relay-filter-domain.cf
>>
>> After I have modified the query part of 'check_client_access'
>> restriction as
> < startup, so there are issues with sharing it that I could think of.
>
>> startup, so there are NO issues with sharing it that I could think of.
>
Thanks. Very clear and complete. At first sight, I prefer to include a
'not shared' config file.
rocsca
--
> >> Paradoxically, a simpler solution in your case is to use a more
> >> complex MTA+amavisd setup, letting MTA separate mail into
> originating
> >> (=locally submitted) and all the rest, and feeding each flow
> >> on a separate amavisd port.
> >>
> >> When code sections in current versions of am
>> Paradoxically, a simpler solution in your case is to use a more
>> complex MTA+amavisd setup, letting MTA separate mail into originating
>> (=locally submitted) and all the rest, and feeding each flow
>> on a separate amavisd port.
>>
>> When code sections in current versions of amavisd need to
Hello,
I have different SMTP gateways each one configurred exactly at the same
manner. The only difference is the hostname.
I would like to know if I could define "/etc/amavisd.conf" as an NFS share
somewhere and export it on each of my SMTP gateways. The aim is obviously
to change only one confi
> Paradoxically, a simpler solution in your case is to use a more
> complex MTA+amavisd setup, letting MTA separate mail into originating
> (=locally submitted) and all the rest, and feeding each flow
> on a separate amavisd port.
>
> When code sections in current versions of amavisd need to know
> > What is the best (and simple) way to avoid spam scan for all email
> > messages destined to a particular recipient?
>
> @bypass_spam_checks_maps = ({
> 'us...@example.com' => 1,
> 'us...@example.com' => 1,
> '.office.example.net' => 1,
> });
>
> @spam_lovers_maps = @bypass_spam_chec
Hello.
What is the best (and simple) way to avoid spam scan for all email
messages destined to a particular recipient?
Thanks,
rocsca
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The f
> in my amavisd-new configuration I have left the default setting for
> mynetwork parameters.
>
> # @mynetworks = qw( 127.0.0.0/8 [::1] [FE80::]/10 [FEC0::]/10
> # 10.0.0.0/8 172.16.0.0/12 192.168.0.0/16 );
>
> Well! I have a long list of network (and this changes often). I
> ma
Hello,
in my amavisd-new configuration I have left the default setting for
mynetwork parameters.
# @mynetworks = qw( 127.0.0.0/8 [::1] [FE80::]/10 [FEC0::]/10
# 10.0.0.0/8 172.16.0.0/12 192.168.0.0/16 );
Well! I have a long list of network (and this changes often). I maintain
i
> You have a few choices for this...
>
>
> - insure that your ram drive is big enough that it's unlikely
> to fill up, else don't use a ram drive.
How much you intend "big enough"?
I have:
/dev/shm262144 12352249792 5% /var/amavis/scan
> - do nothing. Postfix will s
> > It was probably filling up gradually and you didn't notice.
> > Or there was a repeated failure, and you weren't monitoring the log.
> >
> > > 2) Is there a safe way to reloading amavisd-new?
> >
> > One way to do it is to:
> > amavisd stop
> > rm -rf /var/amavis/scan
> > mkdir /var/amavi
> > I have scheduled a cronjob to update rulesets of spamassassin:
> > sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org --
> channel
> > updates.spamassassin.org && /usr/sbin/rcamavisd reload
> > I get the bad surprise that - after Amavisd-new reloading - the mail
> > gateway is stop
> > I have scheduled a cronjob to update rulesets of spamassassin:
> > sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org --
> channel
> > updates.spamassassin.org && /usr/sbin/rcamavisd reload
> > I get the bad surprise that - after Amavisd-new reloading - the mail
> > gateway is stop
> > I have scheduled a cronjob to update rulesets of spamassassin:
> > sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org --
> channel
> > updates.spamassassin.org && /usr/sbin/rcamavisd reload
> > I get the bad surprise that - after Amavisd-new reloading - the mail
> > gateway is stop
> > sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org --channel
> > updates.spamassassin.org && /usr/sbin/rcamavisd reload
>
> I do this same thing, except instead of doing a reload I do:
> /usr/sbin/rcamavisd restart
> I have not encountered the problems you mention.
Substantially, m
Hello.
I have scheduled a cronjob to update rulesets of spamassassin:
sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org --channel
updates.spamassassin.org && /usr/sbin/rcamavisd reload
I get the bad surprise that - after Amavisd-new reloading - the mail
gateway is stopped.
I have inve
> > > Just move it from @av_scanners to the @av_scanners_backup list
> > > and keep clamd as a primary virus scanner.
> >
> > I never have read the conf file completely... :-( Sorry..
> > Now I have:
> > @av_scanners = ( ...
> > @av_scanners_backup = ( ...
>
> > But from docs it seems to me that
> > The CPU has grown again.. I fear that I have to disable it!
>
> Just move it from @av_scanners to the @av_scanners_backup list
> and keep clamd as a primary virus scanner.
>
I never have read the conf file completely... :-( Sorry..
Now I have:
@av_scanners = (
### http://www.clamav.net/
>
https://secure.nai.com/apps/downloads/free_evaluations/default.asp?regi
> > > on=us&segment=small
> >
> > I will try and I'll let you know..
> >
>
> The CPU has grown again.. I fear that I have to disable it!
>
Or maybe is there a way to set 'uvscan' as secondary mail scanner and to
scan email
>
https://secure.nai.com/apps/downloads/free_evaluations/default.asp?regi
> > on=us&segment=small
>
> I will try and I'll let you know..
>
The CPU has grown again.. I fear that I have to disable it!
rocsca
-
This SF.Net em
> Frown indeed - that's ancient, and I believe EOL'd. See the trial
> version of 5.30 McAfee VirusScan Command Line Scanner for Linux
>
> here:
>
>
https://secure.nai.com/apps/downloads/free_evaluations/default.asp?regi
> on=us&segment=small
I will try and I'll let you know..
Many thanks,
roc
> > due to high load of my Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL boxes, I have had
to
> > disable the primary virus scanner (UVSCAN). I found that UVSCAN is
> very
>
> I have found that ClamAV detects as much or more than uvscan. Can you
> place uvscan as a backup scanner?
>
> > CPU expensive so I had no ot
Hello,
due to high load of my Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL boxes, I have had to
disable the primary virus scanner (UVSCAN). I found that UVSCAN is very
CPU expensive so I had no other choice other then disable it. So
Amavisd-new at the moment is using only CLAMAV. If it crash or stops
working for som
> > status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: conversation with
> > 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the initial server
> > greeting)
>
> Is postfix trying to open more connections to amavisd than
> there are amavisd child processes ($max_servers) running?
> Is this a pre-qu
Hello,
I'm using Amavisd-new+MySQL+Postfix platform.
I saw some message in maillog:
status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: conversation with
127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the initial server
greeting)
Moreovere I tried to lauch amavisd-nanny but I get:
# /usr/local/s
Thanks Mark,
> Rocsca,
>
> > I'm using SA with SQL support under Amavid-new. My DBMS is MySQL.
> > I 'm preparing one another Antispam server and I ve installed the
> > latest stable software available.
> > I ve dumped bayes DB (schema + data) from an already
> working machine
> > and I ve res
Hello,
I'm using SA with SQL support under Amavid-new. My DBMS is MySQL.
I 'm preparing one another Antispam server and I ve installed the latest
stable software available.
I ve dumped bayes DB (schema + data) from an already working machine and
I ve restore them on the new machine.
But when I
> > > Since the bottleneck is SA and not Postfix you should rather use
> > > load balancing for the internal forwarding to amavisd-new and
> > > distribute the load of content scanning to different machines.
> >
> > It could be a reasonable remark..
> >
> > > Set in master.cf of postfix for exa
> Since the bottleneck is SA and not Postfix you should rather
> use load balancing for the internal forwarding to amavisd-new
> and distribute the load of content scanning to different machines.
It could be a reasonable remark..
> Set in master.cf of postfix for example
> -o content_filter=a
> As you have found, it's very difficult to do anything other
> than very crude load management via DNS. Obviously you can
> make it a little bit better by keeping your DNS TTLs short,
> but it's a very blunt tool.
>
> The only load-balancing method that provides a more
> immediate and t
> Thanks Gary,
>
> you're explanation is very brief and fully explanatory.
>
> I surely will execute some measurement of SA efficiency by
> increasing log verbosity.
>
> In the mean time I find very embarassing some situations
> where I have a congtestioned SMTP gateway server and I can't
>
> >From what I understand from these posts:
> http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=117199107216689
> http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=118582818426445
> your active queue is overloaded. If this is the case, this
> often is a result of messages coming in faster than they are
> going out (quite of
Hello,
I submit you this few maillog rows:
Mar 19 12:25:38 av5 postfix/cleanup[16063]: C059E228463:
message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
main1spa.it>
Mar 19 12:25:38 av5 postfix/qmgr[20646]: C059E228463:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=3494, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Mar 19 13:00:56 av5 postfix/smtp[28218]:
Hello,
Since some days the number of SMTP connections rejected by my server is
increased (maybe doubled). It doesn't worry me. But there is a side
effect because even the number of false negative is increased.
For example, at the moment a spam message with this header is considered
clean by Amav
On my mail gateway, amavisd-new has deferred some message with the
following message:
Service shutting down, Can't write to mail file: Bad file descriptor at
(eval 62) line 626, chunk 69. (in reply to end of DATA command))
What it could be happened?
BTW, then the message was accepted and forwar
> Rocsca,
>
>> - After I finished my test, I have tried to return the the original
>> configuration. So I have dropped the '$inet_socket_bind = undef'
>> configuration line, and then I have restarted amavisd-new.
>> - Amavisd-new was correctly bound on local local port. But no connection
>> from
>> > > $inet_socket_bind = undef;
>
>> Anyway, if I switch again to the amavisd-new conf without "
>> $inet_socket_bind = undef", amavisd refuse connection from postfix:
>> dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: connect to
>> 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: Connection refused)
>>
>> w
> > > I have set:
> > > $inet_socket_port = [10024,10027,9998];
> $interface_policy{'9998'} =
> > > 'AM.PDP'; $policy_bank{'AM.PDP'} = {
> > > protocol => 'AM.PDP',
> > > inet_acl => [qw( 127.0.0.1 [::1] 10.166.231.245
> )], }; For
> > > MailZU installation purpouse, i need to a
> > I have set:
> > $inet_socket_port = [10024,10027,9998]; $interface_policy{'9998'} =
> > 'AM.PDP'; $policy_bank{'AM.PDP'} = {
> > protocol => 'AM.PDP',
> > inet_acl => [qw( 127.0.0.1 [::1] 10.166.231.245 )], }; For
> > MailZU installation purpouse, i need to access to
> Amavis
I have set:
$inet_socket_port = [10024,10027,9998];
.
.
.
$interface_policy{'9998'} = 'AM.PDP';
$policy_bank{'AM.PDP'} = {
protocol => 'AM.PDP',
inet_acl => [qw( 127.0.0.1 [::1] 10.166.231.245 )],
};
For MailZU installation purpouse, i need to access to Amavisd-new server
from
> > I have a frontend SMTP gateway that serves serveral domains. The
> > frontend spans trhough several server. Every server has the same
> > configuration/hardware. The platform of every server is
> > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new.
> >
> > I would like to enhanche my system implementing a shared qua
> > @lookup_sql_dsn
> > It is worth to use it? What I have to put in amavis SQL database.
>
> If static lookups meet your needs, there is no advantage to
> enable SQL-based lookups.
>
> The main advantage of SQL-based (or LDAP-based) lookups is
> that changes in a database take effect immediate
It is worth to use it? What I have to put in amavis SQL database.
Thanks,
rocsca
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse01207
Configuration error found:
$virus_quarantine_method = '@sql';
$spam_quarantine_method = '@sql';
$banned_quarantine_method = '@sql';
$bad_header_quarantine_method = '@sql';
instead of:
$virus_quarantine_method = 'sql:';
$spam_quarantine_method = 'sql:';
$banned_quarantine_method = 'sql:';
$bad
Mark,
> Rocco,
>
>> av4:~ # tail -f /var/log/amavis | grep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ...
>> Jan 17 17:26:42 av4 amavis[340]: (00340-02-38) lookup
>> (score_sender<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) => undef, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" does not
>> match
>> Jan 17 17:26:43 av4 amavis[340]: (00340-02-38) SPAM-KILL,
>> <[EMAIL
> Other than what I mentioned about sending test messages from trusted
> users (users in a policy bank that allows spam to pass for example),
> nothing comes to mind.
>
> I would prepare a spam message (gtube for example):
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/gtube.txt
>
> and send it from a hotm
>> But, when I not use SQL for quarantine I have not set no one of the
>> variable above as well
I have not set the variables *_to explicitily.
>> and filtering works. Why?
>>
>
> Define what you mean by filtering. Do you mean malware is sent to
> quarantine?
Exactly. Maybe I have used the inco
>> > > I have restarted. The messages are correctly stored in msgs
>> > table (it
>> > > has been written maddr,msgrcpt tables too). But no spam
>> > messages was
>> > > detected. Maybe do I have to fill the RO tables before to run
>> > > amavisd-new+SQL?
>> >
>> > Should be:
>> >
>> > $virus_quara
> > @storage_sql_dsn = (
> > ['DBI:mysql:database=***;host=10.166.231.245;port=3306',
> '***', '***']
> > ); $timestamp_fmt_mysql = 1; # if using MySQL *and*
> msgs.time_iso is
> > TIMESTAMP;
> > # defaults to 0, which is good for non-MySQL or if
> msgs.time_iso is
> > CHAR(16)
> > $virus_
Hello.
I'm starting to use SQL for storing quarantine.
I have set:
@storage_sql_dsn = (
['DBI:mysql:database=***;host=10.166.231.245;port=3306', '***', '***']
);
$timestamp_fmt_mysql = 1; # if using MySQL *and* msgs.time_iso is
TIMESTAMP;
# defaults to 0, which is good for non-MySQL or if m
Hello.
I have a frontend SMTP gateway that serves serveral domains. The
frontend spans trhough several server. Every server has the same
configuration/hardware. The platform of every server is
Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new.
I would like to enhanche my system implementing a shared quarantine
(hopefull
Hello.
I have a frontend SMTP gateway that serves serveral domains. The frontend
spans trhough several server. Every server has the same
configuration/hardware. The platform of every server is
Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new.
I would like to enhanche my system implementing a shared quarantine
(hopefull
> > > What is it that you are seing in X-Spam-Level?
> > > It should contain as many $sa_spam_level_char characters
> (or short
> > > strings) as the score value indicates, rounded to an integer.
> >
> > the content of root home dir:
> >
> > X-Spam-Level: Mail autoinst.xml bin ip.awk ip.sh patch-
> > Hello, for quarantined emails, I read that this header reports the
> > listing of a directory of my file system :-(.
> > Who decide the value for this header?
>
> What is it that you are seing in X-Spam-Level?
> It should contain as many $sa_spam_level_char characters (or
> short strings) as
Hello, for quarantined emails, I read that this header reports the
listing of a directory of my file system :-(.
Who decide the value for this header?
rocsca
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net
>> What is 'fail2ban'?
>
> Make Google your friend.
> http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
Nice.
But I need to inform a client of my network as soon as I block him.
>> I would like to know if there is something of ready to use..
>>
>> Otherwise, I'm thinking to use awk to get
> > from my amavid-new log I saw that a significant protion of spam is
> > generated inside my network. Here the command:
> >
> > # cat /var/log/amavis | grep -i "Blocked SPAM, LOCAL"
> >
> > I have configured Postfix so that it lookups an IP for
> client access
> > to my SMTP gataway. If loo
Hello,
from my amavid-new log I saw that a significant protion of spam is
generated inside my network. Here the command:
# cat /var/log/amavis | grep -i "Blocked SPAM, LOCAL"
I have configured Postfix so that it lookups an IP for client access to
my SMTP gataway. If lookup is succesfull, that I
> > I don't have understood why sometimes the zipped files with
> password
> > are blocked while other times the are passed.
> >
> > What is the logic?
>
> Check the log. At log level 1 search for 'p.path', which
> gives the reason for a banning decision. I think zip has a
> notion of password
OK I will enable log level = 1 and then I see what happens.
rocsca
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Mark Martinec
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:41 PM
> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Pass
I don't have understood why sometimes the zipped files with password are
blocked while other times the are passed.
What is the logic?
rocsca
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novel
> > I'm trying to figure out how can I do so that Amavisd-new avoid to
> > check emails from a particular sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to a
> particular
> > receiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, with a password protected zipped file
> > attached.
> >
> > Could someone give me an hint?
> >
> > rocsca
> >
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how can I do so that Amavisd-new avoid to check
emails from a particular sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to a particular
receiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, with a password protected zipped file
attached.
Could someone give me an hint?
rocsca
--
> >> OOPS, I blundered. You cannot bypass spam checks and still
> get spam
> >> tags. You should ONLY use spam_lover if you want mail spam tagged.
>
> > I tried to sent a spam to an address of the spam lover domain:
>
> > /usr/local/src/amavisd-new-2.4.4/test-messages # sendmail -i
> > [EMAIL
> If the domain is considered local and the message scores over
> spam_tag2_level it should get this tag. Each user in
> @example.com could still have a policy where where their
> spam_tag2_level is set.
>
> > rocsca
>
> Gary V
Still thanks,
rocsca
-
> If you were not using SQL (or every user in the @example.com
> domain had spam_lover = NULL and bypass_spam_checks = NULL) ,
> you could set:
Sorry for the confusion..
> @bypass_spam_checks_maps = ( [qw( .example.com )] );
> @spam_lovers_maps = ( [qw( .example.com )] );
Codld I get spam fo
> One possibility (depending on your setup). Create a policy
> where every configuration setting is NULL with the exception
> of spam_lover and bypass_spam_checks (you need to set both
> when bypassing). Something like this:
My setup is Amavisd-new+Postfix+MySQL
> INSERT INTO policy (id, polic
Hello,
I would like to not block the spam for some domain.
I saw a parameter $bypass_spam_checks_maps it seems the right suitable
for my case, but I would like to know how to use it storing domain name
in a file or SQL database and other better methods (if there any) for
my purpouse.
thanks,
r
> > And.. Is it possible to use separate directory for
> .spamassassin
> > files?
>
> Possible. SpamAssassin creates its temporary files in a
> directory pointed to by the environment variable TMPDIR if
> defined, or in /tmp otherwise. You probably have a setting
> like the following in a
> Mark your very clear.. bu I get:
>
> # patch < 0.patch
> patching file amavisd
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R?
> [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file amavisd.rej
> missing header for unified diff at line 16
> Save a patch to some file, e.g. 0.patch, then cd to a
> directory where amavisd is located, and apply the patch with
> a 'patch' command, feeding 0.patch on stdin to it, e.g.:
>
> cd /usr/local/sbin
> #have 0.patch ready in this directory
> patch < 0.patch
Mark your very clear.. bu I get:
> > If we are referring to:
> > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5444
> > these files should eventually get deleted automatically.
And.. Is it possible to use separate directory for .spamassassin
files?
rocsca
---
> I never suggested using a tmpfs for temporary files. Under a
> decent journalling or UFS file system I don't think any
> (small) savings are worth the risk of having a file system
> too small, or wasting unnecessary memory.
http://www.arschkrebs.de/postfix/amavisd_tmpfs.shtml
> If we are ref
> > I get these warning..
> >
> > WARNING: bad headers - Improper use of control character
> (char 0D hex):
> > Subject: Richiesta di Invio Schede Prodotto\r \n
>
> If this is coming from your clients, these really need to be
> fixed, using a bare CR within a header is an ugly offense.
> Allow
I get these warning..
WARNING: bad headers - Improper use of control character (char 0D hex):
Subject: Richiesta di Invio Schede Prodotto\r \n
I saw the amavisd.conf:
# for defanging bad headers only turn on certain minor contents
categories:
$defang_by_ccat{+CC_BADH.",3"} = 1; # NUL or CR cha
I get these warning..
WARNING: bad headers - Improper use of control character (char 0D hex):
Subject: Richiesta di Invio Schede Prodotto\r \n
I saw the amavisd.conf:
# for defanging bad headers only turn on certain minor contents
categories:
$defang_by_ccat{+CC_BADH.",3"} = 1; # NUL or CR cha
Hello,
I have problem with the directory tmp inside the home directory of the
user running amavisd-new (which use spamassassin).
That directory is configured as temporary dir for Amavisd-new. I mounted
on it a tmpfs file system. The size of the partition is the one
suggested for this job (to do
> You could use my script for resending ham and optionally
> whitelisting (whitelist_from_rcvd in local.cf) the senders of
> these ham messages.
Thanks Leon,
I will take take a look at you script.
Surely, I will be very worth for me..
rocsca
-
> Check amavisd.conf and see if you have a $unix_socketname configured.
> Make a note of the current setting if it exists. If it does
> not, then configure it.
>
> There is a program called amavisd-release. It comes with the
> source code. You may have to edit the $socketname in
> amavisd-relea
Hello,
I have a relay SMTP server system Amavisd-new+Postfix+MySQL-based.
I have configured spamassassin to quarantine spam message.
Now I would like to know a simple way to release a quarantined message
after, for example, I have verified that the message is a false
positive..
Could someone e
Hello,
I use SA storing data on MySQL databases.
I have seen the awl contains email address with the value 'none' in the
field 'IP'.
Why this field for some entriesis not correctly filled?
Thanks,
rocsca
-
Take Surveys. E
Thanks Gary V for you answers,
Could you suggest me something about this problem..
> > > I already have
> >
> > > innodb_data_file_path = /var/lib/mysql/ibdata1:500M:autoextend
> >
> > > which should be enough...
> >
> > I don't know enough about MySQL to know if it is or not.
> This does no
Hello,
> > How I have to do so that I can delete the same entry from native SA
> > database? (ie.: if I don't use the DB?)
>
> > rocsca
>
> See check_whitelist provided with the source code, or:
> http://www.deepnet.cx/~kdeugau/spamtools/trim_whitelist
>
> but this deletes *all* 'one off' entr
Thanks.
> >> AFAIK AWL grows forever. Something like this may help somewhat:
> >> DELETE FROM `awl` WHERE `count` = 1 AND `totscore` > 5;
>
> > Could You explain why you choose 5 as value threshold?
> > Thanks,
> > rocsca
>
> Somewhat arbitrary but SpamAssassin uses a target score of 5
> for th
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
