one of my users complains she can no longer send PDFs, claim our mail
server 'blocks them and marks them as virus'
she says she emailed to her gmail account, as well, account on our server,
and, on our server it came with a text attachement 'ZW.txt' which says
'virus detected'
I'm guessing this
I'm guessing this ZW.txt is added by some equipment at their end ? before
they upload it to our server
seems case solved:
--
I found its what was the problem. ZW.txt I think maybe Zywall35(our
firewall). Everything working as well ZW.txt did not come again and
.pdf file can
On Wed, March 17, 2010 3:14 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
Advice (mouss and others) feed authenticated mail to amavisd on a
dedicated port is good, regardless of whether you need this separation
right away, or later.
(from mouss):
-o content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10586
Mark, Gary,
On Sat, March 27, 2010 12:32 pm, Mark Martinec wrote:
I already have delimiter set
# grep delimiter amavisd.conf
$recipient_delimiter = '+'; # undef disables address extensions
altogether
$addr_extension_spam is undef by default, so you also need:
$addr_extension_spam = 'spam';
And
On Sat, March 27, 2010 5:04 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Sat, March 27, 2010 12:32 pm, Mark Martinec wrote:
#grep local_domains_maps amavisd.conf
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain] ); # list of all local domains
so, I need to list all my domains like:
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain
I have postfixadmin 2.2.0, amavisd-new-2.6.4 (20090625), ClamAV, bdc,
CourierIMAP, virtual domains/users in MySQL, it all works well, thanks.
currently, all users spam goes to 'all_users_spam' mailbox.
I'd like to implement '+' subaddressing for user+spam.
reading a thread on postfix list, I
I use ClamAV as well as BDC console edition 7.1,
looking with 'top' whenever bdc scans, it seems to pull high CPU
is there simple simple way to compare 'effectiveness' of Clam versus BDC ?
what other av scanners do others use ?
--
Voytek
anyone using amavis-stats ?
I'm trying to setup amavis-stats 1.22 on centos/apache
data seems to be collecting, but, no graphs being created
I guess it fails trying to make a graph, but not sure how to figure this out
sbt.net.au/amavis-stats/
I get the main page with buttons, but, no graphs,
On Tue, March 16, 2010 5:08 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
No they are not valid according to RFC 5322 (ex RFC 2822).
Mail client should have encoded these characters according to RFC 2047.
Mark, Noel, thanks
yes, they're using a rather old mail client
WHAT IS AN INVALID CHARACTER IN A MAIL
On Wed, March 17, 2010 11:00 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
so, dumb question:
These are two mostly independent features: verification and signing.
The message [1] only says that verification is disabled. Turning on
DKIM verification does not require any keys or certificates on your side,
these
I see some email tagged as 'bad heade'r where the user has say Polish
ogonki charcters or Thai characters
both of these are valid emails, what's the best way to avoid such
charcters triggering bad header ? (or should I simply not test for bad
headers?)
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION
I have Postfix with SMTP AUTH with amavisd, it all works well (as long as
I don't touch it..)
(cross posted to postfix list as well)
I have now allowed some users to use SMTP AUTH, but, some of their mail
then gets evaluated as 'spam' by amavisd/spamassasin scores, amongst
these, 'dynamic ip'
I have a user site geographically remote to my mail server, I've told them
to use SMTP AUTH to be able to use the SMTP server, but, looking at the
mail header of email I see this[1];
doing mxtoolbox lookup I see the IP addresses are listed in several
blacklists[2];
one of the addresses is
On Thu, February 11, 2010 8:59 pm, Mark Martinec wrote:
Could it be that cpan install placed the module in a path
not visible to your perl?
Try: perl -le 'use IO::File; print IO::File-VERSION'
Versions of IO::File prior to IO-1.22 did not have a binmode method.
Mark, thanks again
# perl
On Thu, February 11, 2010 9:16 pm, Mark Martinec wrote:
Btw, if these mailboxes are directly viewable by users, then you are
misusing a quarantine feature of amavisd. Quarantine entries are not
per-recipient, so you'd be in trouble with multi-recipient messages. Also
there are privacy
I have several false-positives I need to release (old spam assasin 'date
in the past' rules, etc)
but I get:
# amavisd-release pHHuN15T1vpc
450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at (eval 95) line 343,
GEN202 line 4.
# amavisd -V
amavisd-new-2.6.4 (20090625)
---
Feb 11
On Thu, February 11, 2010 3:35 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
but I don't know what would be the best way to resolve it properly.
Actually the following might be a more universal solution,
relying on amavisd to decide whether it is a SQL or file-based quarantine,
based on its SQL settings:
---
On Thu, February 11, 2010 6:53 am, Voytek Eymont wrote:
oops, my 'spams' have been sent to spam mailbox, are not in Q...
what the best way to requeue them as 'original sender' ?
OK, this done the trick:
email.pl v0.1 usage:
email.pl file recipient_address [sender_address]
does anyone has
several of my users had recently quite a few 'inter-office' emails wrongly
diverted to 'spam user' mailbox:
us...@thisdom us...@thisdom
'thisdom' is hosted on the server, but, the users are remote to the
server, mail sent via several diferent isps
I've looked at the spam headers, quite a few had
On Thu, February 11, 2010 8:33 am, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/10/2010 3:06 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
add to your spamassassin/local.cf score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0
Wild guess is the new SA version installed to a different
location, and amavisd is still using the old version of SA.
Noel,
thanks
On Thu, February 11, 2010 6:53 am, Voytek Eymont wrote:
oops, my 'spams' have been sent to spam mailbox, are not in Q...
what the best way to requeue them as 'original sender' ?
can I copy actual mail files from /var/mail/vhost/s...@domain mailbox to
/var/virusmail, and, then use amavid
yesterday I was doing spamassasin update, just noticed in my mailq this:
---
3107CB446FB18582 Thu Feb 11 09:25:23
prvs=6500a7815=accountspaya...@xxx.com
(host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing,
id=32496-02, mime_decode-1 FAILED: Can't locate object method
I am getting mails caught in the deferred q with:
--
AFA05B44845 3085241 Thu Feb 11 10:07:31 s...@hotmail.com
(host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing,
id=21117-12, mime_decode-1 FAILED: Can't locate object method binmode
via package IO::File at
I'm trying to setup Dale Walsh's amavis-stats 0.1.22
what the proper way to set up access to /var/log/maillog, I'm getting
'permission denied'
-rw--- 1 root root 103472334 Nov 2 04:13 /var/log/maillog
# amavis-stats debug
Nov 2 23:33:38 Amavis-Stats[13230]: starting.
On Wed, October 29, 2008 12:57 pm, Gary V wrote:
thanks, Gary, Mike, Mark,
remember to run: spamassassin --lint after adding any new rules.
ooops, I think the rules might be OK, but, seems I have a problem
soemwhere else...:
any thoughts ?
-
# spamassassin --lint
Subroutine
(sorry, Gary, meant posting to the list)
On Wed, October 29, 2008 12:57 pm, Gary V wrote:
If you want the rules file, you could wget if from:
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavis-sanesecurity_v2.cf
remember to run: spamassassin --lint after adding any new rules.
Gary, Mike, Mark,
many
On Mon, October 27, 2008 10:14 am, Gary V wrote:
I think it makes for a cleaner and simpler setup to run as clamav (as
it appears you are doing), add the clamav user to the amavis group and
insure 'AllowSupplementaryGroups yes' is set.
Gary,
thanks again for help and suggestions
I've
On Fri, October 24, 2008 12:51 pm, Gary V wrote:
On 10/23/08, Voytek Eymont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typically you need to add the amavis user to the clamav group and insure:
AllowSupplementaryGroups yes
is in clamd.conf.
http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.unix.amavis-user
My clam setup failed quite a while ago, and, it's only now that I've fixed
it (or perhaps not)
even though clam wasn't running, I never disabled it from amavis
(generating continual 'fail' log entries)
now, I've started clam, stop/started amavis, and, see this:
what is it telling me?
Oct 23
On Sun, July 20, 2008 3:53 am, MrC wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
Well, this is a tough call. You're using a distro with a stability
policy, but CPAN is all about latest and greatest. So, if you need
stability, stay with your distros packages and just update for security
issues. If you want
On Sat, July 19, 2008 5:32 pm, MrC wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
use Scalar::Util qw(dualvar);
line. It is that module that is failing to be included. Since you've
updated via CPAN, you can update Scalar::Util as well.
In cpan:
force install Scalar::Util
OK
this will force update
On Sat, July 19, 2008 9:00 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
# service amavisd start
Starting Mail Virus Scanner (amavisd): [ OK ]
thanks !
now I noticed in mailq there are things with 'failed seek ... File::Temp'
I've reinstalled File::Temp, reloaded amavisd, flush
On Sun, July 20, 2008 3:25 am, MrC wrote:
Peter Huetmannsberger wrote:
If it works for others, that's
excellent. But if/when it fails, what's the next step for the OP ?
ask question on amavis list ???
g,dr
--
Voytek
On Sun, July 20, 2008 3:59 am, MrC wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
now I noticed in mailq there are things with 'failed seek ...
File::Temp'
I've reinstalled File::Temp, reloaded amavisd, flush and requed queue
reinstalled from what source ?
Mr C,
many thanks for all the help
I have amavisd on Centos 4x, it all (used to) work fine;
this morning I noticed amavisd not running, mail queuing up
# service amavisd start
Starting Mail Virus Scanner (amavisd): ERROR: MISSING REQUIRED BASIC MODULES:
Compress::Zlib
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/amavisd line
On Sat, July 19, 2008 2:37 pm, MrC wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
then it fails
what went wrong with my perl ?
I think this has occurred for you not too long ago. Have you looked
through the past threads here:
http://marc.info/?l=amavis-userw=2r=1s=%22Compress%3A%3AZlib%22q=b
What
I have users that need to send executables and the like via email,
currently, amavis rejects them with 'banned message', asking for encrypted
ZIPs (see below)
I edited /etc/amavis.conf as below, adding 'zip'
### BLOCK THE FOLLOWING, EXCEPT WITHIN UNIX ARCHIVES:
# ve 04/04/2008 added 'zip'
On Sat, April 5, 2008 11:28 pm, Gary V wrote:
On 4/5/08, Voytek Eymont wrote:
It was rejected because it's an .exe file. You might move it up, before
this:
### BLOCKED ANYWHERE
# qr'^UNDECIPHERABLE$', # is or contains any undecipherable components
qr'^\.(exe-ms|dll
On Sat, April 5, 2008 11:28 pm, Gary V wrote:
On 4/5/08, Voytek Eymont wrote:
Gary,
further to my earlier post, I'm still struggling to understand this, but,
now I've used section of config that Markus posted here few month ago, as
below, and, it seems to do what I need
I currently have spam and bad header sent to spam@ and badheaders@ mailboxes;
that works fine, but I need to get rid of accumulated spam after a few days;
what the best way to get rid of mails older than say 7 days from spam@
mailbox ?
I was thinking of running archive-mail utility against that
On Wed, March 19, 2008 4:07 am, MrC wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
...
===
2008-03-18 10:52:53 [27470] FuzzyOcr stopped, message got 9 points by
other FuzzyOcr tests (10.00910). 2008-03-18 11:01:04 [27470] FuzzyOcr
stopped, message got 9 points by other FuzzyOcr tests (10.01810
I have a user attempting to send newsletter over SMTP SASL AUTH that get
blocked as header below from spam quarantine:
what's my best way to avoid rejection ?
-
X-Quarantine-ID: IyJbtvja55Fh
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 7.585
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.585 tag=0.5
I just tried 'service reload' option but it didn't seem to work
I guess this is perhaps a fault with 'service' script ? rather than amavis
just reporting just in case
centos 4.x
# amavisd -V
amavisd-new-2.5.4 (20080312)
# service --version
service ver. 0.91
# uname -a
Linux 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL #1
On Sat, March 15, 2008 11:06 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
For FuzzyOcr it is optional, but you need to tell it that
you don't have it. There is a setting in FuzzyOcr.cf where you can list
what optional external programs you have. Comment out the ones that you do
not have, e.g.:
# Include
On Sat, March 15, 2008 11:06 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
so, I've installed the ready made executables from rpm... hower, I think
I'm still missing 'pam-something' and 'someother', they
seem to be in another RPM, that I aim to search for this weekend
If you mean pamthreshold, it is from the
On Fri, March 14, 2008 10:15 pm, Mark Martinec wrote:
It is called IO::File, not IO:File.
ooops...sorry..
thanks, Mark, now installed fine, hopefully the error will go away...
(and, I've fixed most of the fuzzyOCR stuff, as well)
--
Voytek
On Sat, March 15, 2008 12:46 am, William Yodlowsky wrote:
ooops...sorry..
thanks, Mark, now installed fine, hopefully the error will go away...
(and, I've fixed most of the fuzzyOCR stuff, as well)
Would you mind sharing what you've found with fuzzyocr? I have the same
problem and it
On Thu, March 13, 2008 5:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
peter, thanks
It looks like you are running RHEL4. WHy don't you just uninstall the
perl module like this:
rpm -e perl-Compress-Zlib
if it won't do that use:
rpm -e --nodeps perl-Compress-Zlib
so far so good
And then reinstall the
On Thu, March 13, 2008 1:44 pm, Clifton Royston wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:35:40PM +1100, Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Thu, March 13, 2008 12:55 pm, John Evans wrote:
cpan install Compress::Zlib
with the force option (which I don't remember the syntax for at the
moment.)
Clifton
On Thu, March 13, 2008 6:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make sure, you hava only one Zlib.pm in your perl folder.
i.e. something like this: (on my CentOS5)
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Compress
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Compress/Zlib.pm
On Thu, March 13, 2008 6:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make sure, you hava only one Zlib.pm in your perl folder.
i.e. something like this: (on my CentOS5)
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Compress
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Compress/Zlib.pm
On Fri, March 14, 2008 10:25 am, Voytek Eymont wrote:
thanks, MrC:
# perl -e 'use Compress::Zlib;'
Compress::Raw::Zlib defines neither package nor VERSION--version check
failed at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/Compress/Raw/Zlib.
thanks, MrC, I'm thinking I'm
my debug start says, inter alia:
can I just 'leave as is' till I figure out /fix /whatever ?
or, is there a deterimental aspect to this broken part ?
[18179] warn: FuzzyOcr: Cannot find executable for giftopnm
[18179] warn: FuzzyOcr: Cannot find executable for jpegtopnm
[18179] warn:
I have amavisd since long time ago,
today, I've altered some x-spam tag values in /etc/amavisd.conf;
when I tried to restart, I get this error:
how do I reinstall zlib ??
how it went missing...?
# service amavisd status
amavisd (pid 19876 19734 2671) is running...
amavis-milter is stopped
#
I noticed that in my log
Mar 14 13:50:42 bilby amavis[30865]: (30865-01) (!!)TROUBLE in check_mail:
mime_decode-1 FAILED: Can't locate object method binmode via package
IO::File at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/MIME/Body.pm line 437.
tried
cpan install IO:File
CPAN: Storable loaded ok
Going
I have amavisd since long time ago,
today, I've altered some x-spam tag values in /etc/amavisd.conf;
when I tried to restart, I get this error:
how do I reinstall zlib ??
how it went missing...?
# service amavisd status
amavisd (pid 19876 19734 2671) is running...
amavis-milter is stopped
#
On Thu, March 13, 2008 12:18 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
I've tried updating zlib as follows, but, no luck:
# rpm -Uvh perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.008-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm
Preparing...###
[100%]
1:perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib
On Thu, March 13, 2008 12:55 pm, John Evans wrote:
I'd use cpan as root and do this once in cpan:
install Compress::Zlib
If it asks for prerequesites to Compress::Zlib, allow cpan to install
it.
thanks, John, thanks, MrC
--
cpan install Scalar::Util
Scalar::Util is up to date.
but when I
what the best way to exempt legit mail outs from 'self rejection' ?
one of my users is preparing template for b/cast emails and, sample
template gets rejected:
---
A message from to:
-
was considered unsolicited bulk e-mail (UBE).
Our internal reference code for your message is
when I 1st setup Postfix, I've grabbed a whole swag of various antiUCE
checks from several Postfix howto sites, and, have used happily ever
since;
amongst them, I have a Postfix header subject check like:
# grep subseq header*
header_checks:/^Subject: .*/WARN
On Fri, November 16, 2007 5:29 am, Noel Jones wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
I used something similar a couple years ago with a WARN and
found it hit nearly equal amounts of ham and spam. So not an accurate
predictor of spam at that time at that time, and I quit using it.
SpamAssassin would
I'm trying to setup amavis to allow anything inside zips, but, seems I'm
overlloking something, as ZIPs still gets blocked:
--
BANNED CONTENTS ALERT
Our content checker found
banned name: multipart/mixed |
application/x-zip-compressed,.zip,twunk_32.zip |
.exe,.exe-ms,twunk_32.exe
On Sat, November 10, 2007 9:06 am, Markus Edholm wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
do you have this line?
# qr'^\.(exe-ms|dll)$', # banned file(1) types,
rudimentary
Marcus, thanks,
I have
### BLOCKED ANYWHERE
# qr'^UNDECIPHERABLE$', # is or contains any undecipherable
On Thu, November 8, 2007 10:46 pm, Marius Sturm wrote:
have a look at monit:
http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/
Marius,
thanks, that's exactly what I was after, I'll set crond with it
--
Voytek
-
This SF.net email is
On Thu, November 8, 2007 6:49 pm, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* RÄzvan Sandu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would it be possible to implement an amavisd-based filter (similar to
clamav) that would convert on the fly the Microsoft files (MIME
attachements to e-mails) to OpenDocument, leaving the body of
whilst in the past clamd has proven extremely reliable, in the last few
weeks I had clamd die maube on 3 ocassions for some reason (perhaps
related to the additional third party signature downloads getting
corrupted?);
so I was thinking of some sort of deamon monitor, if it dies to restart
it,
On Fri, November 9, 2007 12:05 am, Bill Landry wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
Are you testing third-party signature files before moving them into
production? There are several scripts available for downloading, testing,
and utilizing third-party signatures (see www.sanesecurity.com). My
On Fri, November 9, 2007 12:05 am, Bill Landry wrote:
Are you testing third-party signature files before moving them into
production? There are several scripts available for downloading, testing,
and utilizing third-party signatures (see www.sanesecurity.com). My
script can also be set to
On Tue, October 30, 2007 4:50 am, Gary V wrote:
On 10/29/07, Voytek wrote:
On Sat, October 20, 2007 2:45 am, Gary V wrote:
For spam, quarantine is triggered by kill_level, so, to prevent spam
from getting quarantined, you could set kill_level high (like ). For
example:
On Wed, October 31, 2007 2:17 am, Gary V wrote:
On 10/30/07, Voytek Eymont wrote:
Personally, I'm not convinced all mail with bad headers should be
treated as spam.
Gary, thanks
yes, I agree, this is just an 'interim' setup, to dump badh to INBOX.spam;
once I can do that, I might try
On Mon, October 29, 2007 9:20 pm, Mark Martinec wrote:
# groups clamav
clamav : clamav amavis
It's the other way around:
amavis:*:110:clamav
Oops, sorry, you showed the optput of 'groups' command,
not a line in /etc/groups. Seems you have it correctly. Perhaps you are
missing the
On Tue, October 30, 2007 11:16 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
Looks fine. I don't know why clamd can't read files in directory
/var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20071029T132434-15307/parts/ . Just in case
please check the protection of each directory in the path - all the
directories from /, /var, ... to the
I'm trying to install amavisd-new and clamav on a new Centos 4.x server,
they both seem to run OK, but, I see 'lstat() failed' in the maillog:
is that because clamd needs permissions to /var/amavis/tmp/ ?
I tried : chmod -R 0770 /var/amavis/tmp but it didn't help
# groups clamav
clamav :
On Sat, October 20, 2007 1:45 am, Gary V wrote:
On 10/19/07, Voytek wrote:
Gary, many thanks
To get amavisd-new to rewrite the address to user+spam, in amavisd.conf,
...
Once the address is rewritten, what software is used to get the mail
to a spam folder depends on what IMAP software you
On Fri, October 19, 2007 9:42 pm, Richard Bishop wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:18:24 +1000 (EST), Voytek Eymont
I'm now looking at 'enhancing' the system with providing per domain
or even per user controls and user 'self management tool'
I suggest you take a look at MailZu which
I have Postfix 2.4 /amavis 2.5.2 /mysql 4.1
/clam with virtual domains/users;
it all works very well, with 'one size fits all' approach;
with just badh/virus/spam/forbidden_lovers as only individual exceptions
I'm now looking at 'enhancing' the system with providing per domain
or even per user
On Mon, October 15, 2007 5:55 pm, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
I didn't know amavislogsumm, but I can see in the changelog that the
last version is dated on feb-2004. It seems an old and out-of-date
project. ¿Do you know amavis-logwatch [1]? It's devepelod by Mike Capella,
an active member of
I have postfix with amavisd, I just tried getting some result reports, get
as below;
I'm fairly certain 'it used to work'...
amavis is OK, spam goes to spam, just, nothing shows in reports
what did I stuff up ?
# amavisd -V
amavisd-new-2.5.0 (20070423)
# amavislogsumm --version
amavislogsumm
On Tue, December 12, 2006 5:33 pm, Johan Barelds wrote:
Hi all,
I am only using ClamAv at the moment for virus scanning.
Is there a good (free) virusscanner which can be used besides ClamAv to
create a second line of defense? Thanks for your suggestions!
I think BDC used to have, perhaps
On Wed, December 13, 2006 4:48 am, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, December 12, 2006 12:03, Voytek Eymont wrote:
it only depends on how much virus one commit to clamav, i use bitdefender
and f-prot, each time this 2 finds a virus not cougt by clamav i commit it
if all users do this from
On Sat, December 2, 2006 5:11 am, MrC wrote:
Gary's solutions have been good ones.
additional setup of postfix/amavis. If you're interested, I'll send you
the mime-encoding script and source to mini_sendmail.
MrC,
if you feel your scripts are idiot-proof, pls send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, November 30, 2006 2:16 pm, Gary V wrote:
Voytek wrote:
On Thu, November 30, 2006 12:45 pm, Gary V wrote:
is this the go: ? -
pickupfifo n - n 60 1 pickup -o
receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks -o content_filter=
Yes, you can
On Thu, November 30, 2006 12:45 pm, Gary V wrote:
Possibly bypass amavisd-new completely or use a policy bank to bypass
spam checks by overriding the content_filter for the pickup service. You
could even limit bypassing to a single recipient if desired. Here is an
example:
I have amavisd-new and postfix;
I use Postconf's spamreport to send blocked email reports to some users;
as of few weeks ago, *some* of my spam reports get canned as 'spam' and,
don't go very far.
what's my best solution to exempt or what should I do to allow spam
reports to be delivered ?
dumb Q:
where do I find meaning of various SA tags ?
I managed to find some on the
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html, but, can't find reference
to TVD_FW_GRAPHIC
Yes, score=7.719 tag=0.5 tag2=6.31 kill=6.31
tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24=2.767, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE=1.091,
On Tue, November 14, 2006 11:05 pm, Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:11:29PM +1100, Voytek Eymont wrote:
That comes from sa-update updates, I don't think all have reference.
Find
the updates from /var/lib/spamassassin where they normally go. If you
can't understand what
I have a user complain valid sender got rejected, mail log says:
Nov 3 14:19:17 koala amavis[26922]: (26922-03-3) SPAM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Yes,
score=6.941 tag=0.5 tag2=6.31 kill=6.31 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599,
EXTRA_MPART_TYPE=1.091, FUZZY_OCR=6.000, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
On Sun, October 22, 2006 11:58 pm, albi albinootje wrote:
On 10/22/06, techlist06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've decided to block .gif completely and advised my users to either use
.jpg or .png, or use something like http://imageshack.us or to wrap it
with gnupg
complete blocking of .gif
On Mon, October 23, 2006 12:27 am, albi albinootje wrote:
On 10/22/06, Voytek Eymont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, October 22, 2006 11:58 pm, albi albinootje wrote:
On 10/22/06, techlist06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how/where did you implement blocking ?
i've added gif to # banned
On Mon, October 23, 2006 7:37 am, mouss wrote:
albi albinootje wrote:
mm, i wasn't aware that postfix can possibly also block
gif-attachments, thanks for the reminder
Not that I encourage blocking gif, but you can use header_checks.
something like:
/^Content-Type:\s*image\/gif/
On Mon, October 2, 2006 4:03 am, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Version amavisd-new-2.4.3 has been released.
It seems to work here (no config change needed)
same here, shut down, copied over, restarted, seems OK
thanks
--
Voytek
somehow, whilst doing a Perl CPAN updates, my Perl got out of sync,
causing Amavis failure.
in the interim, I've diabled amavis from /etc/postfix/main.cf, so, my mail
works again
before I look at fixing my problems:
how do I get all the 'stuck' mail out:
#mailq
...
F0D99238A2E11257 Tue Jul
Oz gov. recently set up an initiative for combating/tracing UCE/UBE/spam,
where ppl can submit received spam for whatever action they'll take
so, I figured I would submit a bunch of NAB phisihing emails that amavis
just deposited to 'infected@' address
of course as soon as I sent them, they
On Wed, May 17, 2006 8:49 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
Your Perl 5.6.1 is quite old, I haven't tested recent versions of
amavisd-new with anything older than Perl 5.8.3. I believe you should
upgrade your Perl and associated modules before or with upgrading of
amavisd-new.
Mark,
thanks
I just
On Fri, May 19, 2006 1:58 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
can I simply edit top of amavisd to point it at the more recent Perl ?
Yes you can. But you would need to be extremely careful when
using existing (and installing new) Perl modules, as these may come from
(go to) one or the other of your
Hi,
I'm running amavisd-new-2.3.1 perl v5.6.1 postfix 2.1x on RH73
all is well, it's not a very large setup, rather basic setup
just looking on the amavisd-new site, I see we're up to 2.4.1
any compelling reasons to upgrade ?
what is the suggested u/g procedure ?
as always, many thanks to
96 matches
Mail list logo
