The biggest difference with the link in the BC-610s, is that the link is on a
pivot joint that is fixed on the center line of the loading coil. You can
rotate the link from vertical and in line with the turns, OR you can place it
perpendicular to the turns AND anywhere in between.
You CANNOT
Barrie,
Download a copy of the manual, TM 11-286.
This can be gotten from:
http://eshop1.chem.buffalo.edu/Beastly-610.html
This is WB2FCNs web site.
The area you want to look at in the TM starts around page 43.
In the Military versions of the HT-4, (BC-610s), there are what looks like HV
Bob:
I've got my HT4-B working FB, for many years.
I own a BC-939, but I've never attempted to use it.
I have the BC-614 speech amp, and this is what I've been using. The only
reason I'd like to have the HT5 is that it's what was originally used with
the rig.
My questions regarding the
Barrie,
There ARE different tube line-ups between the HT-5 and the BC-614.
From your description of the mounting for the shelf and socket for the
padder cap, there are obviously differences inside the BC-610 vs. the HT-4.
I'm curious as to what differences in meters there is. I have one for
Barrie,
There ARE different tube line-ups between the HT-5 and the BC-614.
I did not know that! Will have to do some research.
From your description of the mounting for the shelf and socket for the
padder cap, there are obviously differences inside the BC-610 vs. the
HT-4.
I went to
For anyone interested, there are some pretty good and descriptive
pictures of a BC-610 E model at
http://w5omr.shacknet.nu:81/~w5omr/hamstuff/AM-Stuff/BC-610/
---
73 = Best Regards,
-Geoff/W5OMR
Bob Wrote:
Of course I have not pursued a whip installation. It
would seem to be a useless endeavor as the 160, 80,
40, and 20 meter bands are normally of horizontal
polarization. I see no logic in operating in cross
polarization, and making communications more
difficult than necessary.
Hi
Well said Jim !! There is only one antenna that works well at any given
moment and that is the one that does (work well) if you are lucky.
73, Charlie, K0NG.
Quoting Jim Candela [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bob Wrote:
Of course I have not pursued a whip installation. It
would seem to be a useless
- Original Message -
From: Jim Candela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of AM Radio
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] BC-610 terminating impedance
Bob Wrote:
Now about that polarization issue you mentioned. I
This has been an interesting thread, and I learned some things about the
HT4-B/BC-610.
Relative to the polarization issue: I read a rather long article quite a
few years ago about a ham who was also an electronics professor at a
university in Italy, I believe.
He set up two separate
I may have missed something here amongst all the messages and I
really am not too familiar with the BC610 but I thought it had variable
loading with an adjustable 3-4 turn link. If so, it should be able to
load into a fairly wide range of loads. On my variable link rig I can
go down
The standard connection from the porcelain insulated connections to the
BC-939 is INDEED 50 ohm coaxial cable.
Those desiring to ELIMINATE TVI issues would NORMALLY install a Low-Pass
filter in-line between the BC-610 and the BC-939 which is already
internally wired with 50 ohm coaxial cable.
12 matches
Mail list logo
