On Friday, October 12, 2007 4:53 PM [EDT],
Aengus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These lines should replace lines 869-874 in the original tree.c:
else if (*(c + 1) == '.' (*(c + 2) == '2')) {
if (strstr(whole, ; x64;) != NULL)
*name = Windows:Windows XP64;
else
*name
Just throwing my 2p in.
We're starting to look for 64bit OS's now... I've been using one for over 8
years. The browsers I've run are both 32bit and 64bit but also I've had to use
different browser strings because of some websites refusal to work with
anything but IE.
The OS I use - Solaris,
further up the chain, the parameter 'whole' doesn't
contain the data.Chrishttp://camie.dyndns.org/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: analog-help@lists.meer.net Subject: Re:
[analog-help] Re: Ann: 6.0.3 Release Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:53:15 -0400
Chris Tilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, what
On Thursday 11 October 2007 18:54:46 Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
Perhaps some Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard developer here (anyone here
seeded?) could chime in on whether Dimitri's presumptions about
doubled RAM or disk usage apply or not?
Objection Your Honor! According to OED, presumption is taking upon
On a personal note on that comment, I would like to know who these people
are that are advising you to use Flash, because as a professional web
designer, I've yet to find anyone who does...
Flash is a tool, and unless you have specific need you plain should not use
it.
Oh and windows will not
-help] Re: Ann: 6.0.3 Release Aengus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Short of just satisfying your curiosity,
what purpose is achieved by knowing how many people use 64-bit browsers?
That's a serious question - is it actually useful information, or is it
just extraneous data? Well
Chris Tilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aengus,Exactly as I said to begin with.
Anyway, As a challenge I have attempted to build this both last night
and tonight using said 'more efficient method', and it doesn't
work.Having said that, I just tried your method 5 minutes ago and it
doesn't work
Aengus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you replace lines 868-874 in trees.c with these lines:
if (strstr(whole, ; x64;) != NULL)
*name = Windows:Windows XP64;
else
*name = Windows:Windows XP;
}
else if (*(c + 1) == '.' (*(c + 2) == '2'))
*name =
On Friday, October 12, 2007 4:53 PM [EDT],
Aengus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These lines should replace lines 869-874 in the original tree.c:
else if (*(c + 1) == '.' (*(c + 2) == '2')) {
if (strstr(whole, ; x64;) != NULL)
*name = Windows:Windows XP64;
else
*name =
Hi,
Well done Aengus, clearly you are a freaking genius or very similar and so
quick too!
Any chance you might upload the new executable somewhere, or else email it to
me (zipped) and I will up it in place of the old one? If not I will have a go
at compiling Analog myself, although it might
P.S. There ARE 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 and 2008...
+
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
|
Aengus,
Okay. I've fought my way through the code update and have recompiled Analog.
I see no evidence of 64-bit operating systems in my latest logfile, which I
know can't be right. I did the same with updating Chris' code and had the
same result. Is your update just for 64-bit BROWSERS
Paul Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aengus,
Okay. I've fought my way through the code update and have recompiled
Analog. I see no evidence of 64-bit operating systems in my latest
logfile, which I know can't be right. I did the same with updating
Chris' code and had the same result. Is
+
To: analog-help@lists.meer.net From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 9 Oct
2007 19:01:08 + Subject: [analog-help] Re: Ann: 6.0.3 Release Chris,
Here are details of my user agent, which I tested here:
http://whatsmyuseragent.com/ You might like to note the WOW64 bit!
Mozilla/4.0
Chris Tilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what is it you
specifically need? A CPU Report? orA 64-bit Browser use Report? or A
64-bit Operating System Report
And if a log analysis tool puports to accurately report a breakdown
between Win32 and Win64 users when that information simply doesn't
Chris Tilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My principal reservation...
Hi Chris,
Whether something is necessary or not doesn’t mean to say it isn’t a great
feature to have. As I say I have seen a 64-bit OS report in another log
analyser and it would be enough to get me (personally) to
Hello Aengus,
All 64-bit browsers for Windows are currently unusable, because web designers
have been encouraged for years to adopt Flash everywhere and as a 32-bit
application, the player won’t install or work on a 64-bit browser.
Paul Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Tilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My principal reservation...
Hi Chris,
Whether something is necessary or not doesn't mean to say it isn't a
great feature to have. As I say I have seen a 64-bit OS report in
another log analyser and it would be
Aengus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And if a log analysis tool puports to accurately report a breakdown
between Win32 and Win64 users when that information simply doesn't exist
in the logfiles, how much faith can you put in the rest of it's
statistics?
Good point. Well, if it can’t be done
On Thursday 11 October 2007 14:59:01 Paul Wade wrote:
...
A 64-bit Browser use Report?
Pretty much essential I would have thought. We have a start already...
You do realize that
first, 64-bit CPU designers made sure their CPUs can run legacy 32-bit code
as fast as native 64-bit code --
Dimitri Maziuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what exactly are you going to learn from 64-bit Browser use Report? --
Erm, how many people use 64-bit browsers?
I'm sorry I thought that was the purpose of a log analyser...
C'mon guys, if you could do it you would!
Paul Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dimitri Maziuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what exactly are you going to learn from 64-bit Browser use
Report? --
Erm, how many people use 64-bit browsers?
Short of just satisfying your curiosity, what purpose is achieved by
knowing how many people use
Aengus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Short of just satisfying your curiosity, what purpose is achieved by
knowing how many people use 64-bit browsers?
That's a serious question - is it actually useful information, or is it
just extraneous data?
Well, the purpose of using a 64-bit OS is like
Am 11.10.2007 um 23:12 schrieb Paul Wade:
Dimitri Maziuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what exactly are you going to learn from 64-bit Browser use
Report? --
Erm, how many people use 64-bit browsers?
I'm sorry I thought that was the purpose of a log analyser...
C'mon guys, if you could
At 07:47 a + 10/11/2007, Paul Wade didst inscribe upon an
electronic papyrus:
Meanwhile I'm having dreadful trouble with my relationships at the moment.
Can you help me with those too?
:0))
hahaha, at least you have relationships. ;)
At 09:11 p + 10/09/2007, Paul Wade didst
Am 11.10.2007 um 23:12 schrieb Paul Wade:
Dimitri Maziuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what exactly are you going to learn from 64-bit Browser use
Report? --
Erm, how many people use 64-bit browsers?
I know, I know! How to craft that TIFF or vulnerability of the month
exploit! 'cuz the
On Tuesday, October 09, 2007 3:53 PM [EDT],
Aengus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if (*c == '5') {
if (*(c + 1) == '.' (*(c + 2) == '0'))
*name = Windows:Windows 2000;
else if (*(c + 1) == '.' (*(c + 2) == '1')) {
if (strstr(whole, x64) != NULL)
*name = Windows:Windows XP64;
On Wednesday, October 10, 2007 9:24 PM [EDT],
Aengus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if (*c == '5') {
if (*(c + 1) == '.' (*(c + 2) == '0'))
*name = Windows:Windows 2000;
else if (*(c + 1) == '.' (*(c + 2) == '1')) {
if (strstr(whole, ; x64;) != NULL)
*name =
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 8 Oct
2007 21:26:13 + Subject: [analog-help] Re: Ann: 6.0.3 Release Chris,
Thanks for your response and explanations regarding Windows Server 2008.
Maybe this situation will change once Microsoft release the final, early
next year apparently. Obviously
Chris,
Here are details of my user agent, which I tested here:
http://whatsmyuseragent.com/
You might like to note the WOW64 bit!
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; SLCC1; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; Media Center PC 5.0)
Should do it I reckon...
Paul
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 9 Oct
2007 17:44:29 + Subject: [analog-help] Re: Ann: 6.0.3 Release Chris,
Blimey. Maybe M$ will make the Windows versions for Vista and Server 2008
different in the end, in the same way XP is 5.1 and Windows Server 2003 is
5.2, because the products share
Paul Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The data you've included looks like downloads of the updated Analog
from your site. As you'll see I didn't download using Vista x64, but
am running it on such as I said. I downloaded using a 32-bit OS on a
processor using the AMD64 architecture and you're
Paul Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While Firefox and Opera (both 32-bit) are as you suggest, much less
helpful.
That depends on what you are looking for - does win32/win64 really
matter if it's a 32-bit browser anyway.
Or to put it another way, if you modified Analog to list Windows XP32
Hey Aengus,
I think ideally both Firefox and Opera would be a little more informative
because it would be great to have an accurate OS report as well. But you're
right from my point of view (mainly design) I just need to know the browser
that my visitors are running, although there are subtle
Cool
+
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
| List archives:
Chris,
So far as I can tell, your update seems to work fine and is doing what I'd
like it to do under Vista Ultimate x64. Here is some initial feedback I hope
you will find useful...
1. It's great there is support for Windows NT now and also for Windows 7,
which I understand is scheduled for
: [analog-help] Re: Ann: 6.0.3 Release Chris,
So far as I can tell, your update seems to work fine and is doing what I'd
like it to do under Vista Ultimate x64. Here is some initial feedback I
hope you will find useful... 1. It's great there is support for Windows
NT now and also
Chris,
Thanks for your response and explanations regarding Windows Server 2008. Maybe
this situation will change once Microsoft release the final, early next year
apparently.
Obviously it's up to you how much work you do on this, but it's great you have
done something which is more than
38 matches
Mail list logo
